• No results found

CONVOLUTION THEOREM AND AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE OCTONIONIC FOURIER TRANSFORM DEFINITION

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "CONVOLUTION THEOREM AND AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE OCTONIONIC FOURIER TRANSFORM DEFINITION"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ISSN: 1311-1728 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-8060 (on-line version) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijam.v31i3.7

CONVOLUTION THEOREM AND AN ALTERNATIVE TO

THE OCTONIONIC FOURIER TRANSFORM DEFINITION

C.A.P. Martinez

1

, D.B. Costa

2

, A.L.M. Martinez

1,2,3

DAMAT, Federal Technological University of Paran´

a

CEP: 86300-000, Corn´elio Proc´

opio, PR, BRASIL

Abstract:

In this paper we present a construction of the Octonionic Fourier

Series and we introduce a version for the Octonionic Fourier Transform with

hy-percomplex exponentials, besides we discuss a possible way of defining the

con-volution product for octonionic functions and also theoretical results. Through

some examples, we illustrate the developed concepts for the octonionic

trans-form and the convolution product.

AMS Subject Classification:

39G99, 30E99

Key Words:

hypercomplex functions, octonions, octonionic Fourier

trans-form, convolution

1. Introduction and Motivation

Octonions are hypercomplex numbers and can be considered as non-associative

quaternions in some ways. They have been applied in larger physics [13], [15],

such as M theory, the strings and theories of alternative gravity. In this work,

in the future we intend to make a greater application of the hypercomplexes in

unified field theories, and motivated both by previous works by Eilenberg, Niven

[3], Deavours [14], Sinegre [1], and in recent results obtained by some of the

authors [10, 11, 12, 4, 6, 5], Boek, Gurlebeck [?], and Lam [2], we focused on the

construction of an extension of Algebra of the hypercomplex, more specifically

in the construction of the Fourier transform Octonions.

Received:

March 25, 2018

c

2018 Academic Publications

(2)

The quaternions were introduced in 1843 by Willian R. Hamilton, at the

same time John T. Graves, a friend of Hamilton, found an 8-dimensional algebra

whose property in non-associativity in a multiplication table is valid. Two

years later, in 1845, after some contributions on the subject by Arthur Cayley,

octonions were also called “Cayley numbers”.

In this context of the present work, and based on an earlier result (Pendeza

et al., op. cit. [7]), we present for octonions the concept of a periodic function

of 2

L

, which we will call the Fourier Octononic Series. We define an exponential

octagonal function and show a non-associative expansion of Moivre’s Theorem

and generalizations of the Euler formula. Finally, we obtain octonionic versions

of the Fourier Transform and present the convolution theorem.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the defined

Octo-nionic Fourier Series, based in [7]. Section 3 describes the construction the

Octonionic Fourier transform and presents the version of the convolution

theo-rem for octonionics. Final theo-remarks are given in Section 4.

2. Octonionic Fourier Series

The octonions are a somewhat nonassociativite extension of the quaternions.

They form the 8-dimensional normed division algebra on

R

.

The octonionic algebra, also called octaves denoted for

O

, is an alternative

division algebra.

The octonions set

O

is denoted by

O

=

{

a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h

} ∈ R

,

where,

(

a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h

) = (

a

, b

, c

, d

, e

, f

, g

, h

)

⇐⇒

a

=

a

, b

=

b

, c

=

c

, d

=

d

, e

=

e

, f

=

f

, g

=

g

, h

=

h

.

The octonions do not form a ring due the non-commutativity of the

multi-plication. Also do not form a group due a nonassociativide of multimulti-plication.

They form a

Moufang Loop, a Loop with identity element (Jacobson [8]).

Let us consider an octonionic number given by

o

=

a

+

b

i

+

c

j

+

d

k

+

e

l

+

f

li

+

g

lj

+

h

lk

.

(3)

Similarly to [6] we start our contribution in considering

f

a function defined

on interval [

L, L

],

L >

0, and outside of this interval set as

f

(

x

) =

f

(

x

+ 2

L

),

that is,

f

(

x

) is 2

L

periodical. If

f

and

f

are piecewise continuous then the

series of function given below,

a

0

2

+

X

n=1

h

a

n

cos

nπx

L

+

b

n

sin

nπx

L

i

,

(1)

is convergent and the limit is

f

e

(

x

) =

lim

a→x+

f

(

x

) + lim

a→x−

f

(

x

)

2

.

The coefficients of Fourier of

f

,

a

0

,

a

n

and

b

n

are given by:

a

0

=

1

L

Z

L

−L

f

(

x

)

dx,

a

n

=

1

L

Z

L

−L

f

(

x

) cos

nπx

L

dx,

(2)

and

b

n

=

1

L

Z

L

−L

f

(

x

) sin

nπx

L

dx.

(3)

The trigonometric series presented in (1) with this choice of coefficients is the

Fourier series of

f

.

Now, we will detail some properties considering octonions

o

∈ O

given by

o

=

u

1

+

u

2

i

+

u

3

j

+

u

4

k

+

u

5

l

+

u

6

li

+

u

7

lj

+

u

8

lk

=

u

1

+

u .

The extended equation of De Moivre for octonions is given by:

e

o

=

e

u1

(

cos

q

u

22

+

u

23

+

u

24

+

u

25

+

u

26

+

u

27

+

u

28

!

(4)

+

~

u

sin(

p

u

22

+

u

23

+

u

24

+

u

52

+

u

26

+

u

27

+

u

28

)

p

u

22

+

u

23

+

u

24

+

u

25

+

u

26

+

u

27

+

u

28

!)

.

Then, using (4) we can obtain:

e

iy

+

e

−iy

2

=

e

0

(cos

|

y

|

+

i

|yy|

sin

|

y

|

) +

e

0

(cos

| −

y

|

+

i

|−−yy|

sin

| −

y

|

)

2

.

Since cos(

y

) = cos(

y

) and sin(

y

) =

sin(

y

) we have that

e

iy

+

e

−iy

(4)

Following the same arguments we can get

cos

y

=

e

iy

+

e

−iy

2

=

e

jy

+

e

−jy

2

=

e

ky

+

e

−ky

2

=

e

ly

+

e

−ly

2

=

e

(li)y

+

e

−(li)y

2

=

e

(lj)y

+

e

−(lj)y

2

=

e

(lk)y

+

e

−(lk)y

2

,

(5)

and

sin

y

=

e

iy

e

−iy

2

i

=

e

jy

e

−jy

2

j

=

e

ky

e

−ky

2

k

=

e

ly

e

−ly

2

l

=

e

(li)y

e

−(li)y

2

li

=

e

(lj)y

e

−(lj)y

2

lj

=

e

(lk)y

e

−(lk)y

2

lk

.

(6)

From (5) and (6), we obtain,

cos

y

=

(

e

iy

+

e

jy

+

. . .

+

e

(lk)y

) + (

e

−iy

+

e

−jy

+

. . .

+

e

−(lk)y

)

14

,

sin

y

=

1

7

"

e

iy

e

−iy

2

i

+

e

jy

e

−jy

2

j

+

. . .

+

e

(lk)y

e

−(lk)y

2

lk

#

.

Consequently,

a

n

cos

nπx

L

+

b

n

sin

nπx

L

=

1

7

a

n

2

+

b

n

2

i

|

{z

}

c1

n

e

inπxL

+

an 2 − bn 2i

| {z }

c1 −n

e−inπx

L +. . .+

an

2 + bn

2(lk)

| {z }

c7

n

e(lk)Lnπx+

an

2 − bn

2(lk)

| {z }

c7 −n

e−(lkL)nπx      .

Following the reasoning presented in [7], we can get

X

n=1

h

ancos nπx

L

+bnsin nπx L i = 1 7 ∞ X

−∞,n6=0

h

c1neinπxL +c2 ne

jnπx L

+c3ne knπx

L +c4 ne

lnπx L + c5

ne linπx

L +c6 ne

ljnπx L +c7

ne lknπx

L i

.

(5)

e

f(x) =c0+1

7    ∞ X

−∞,n6=0

c1neinπxL +c2 ne

jnπx L +c3

ne knπx

L +c4 ne

lnπx

L (7)

+c5nelinπxL +c6 ne

ljnπx L +c7

ne lknπx

L o

,

where consideringc0=a20.

The series (7) is the octonionic Fourier series off.

3. The Octonionic Fourier Transform

In this section we will consider the definition of Octonionic Fourier Series (7) to deduce a model for Octonionic Fourier Transform. From equation (7), consider f defined in the interval (−L.L) withf and f′ are piecewise continuous. Denoting α

n = nπL, we

obtain

e

f(x) = 1 2L

Z L

−L

f(u)du+ 1 14L

X

−∞,n6=0

("Z L

−L

f(u)e−i(αnu)du #

eiαnx

+

"Z L

−L

f(u)e−j(αnu)du #

ejαnx+ "Z L

−L

f(u)e−k(αnu)du #

ekαnx

+

"Z L

−L

f(u)e−l(αnu)du #

elαnx+ "Z L

−L

f(u)e−li(αnu)du #

eliαnx

+

"Z L

−L

f(u)e−lj(αnu)du #

eljαnx+ "Z L

−L

f(u)e−lk(αnu)du #

elkαnx )

,

considering ∆α=αn+1−αn,

= ∆α 2π

Z L

−L

f(u)du+ 1 14π

X

−∞,n6=0

("Z L

−L

f(u)e−i(αnu)du #

eiαnx

+

"Z L

−L

f(u)e−j(αnu)du #

ejαnx+ "Z L

−L

f(u)e−k(αnu)du #

ekαnx

+

"Z L

−L

f(u)e−l(αnu)du #

elαnx+ "Z L

−L

f(u)e−li(αnu)du #

eliαnx

+

"Z L

−L

f(u)e−lj(αnu)du #

eljαnx+ "Z L

−L

f(u)e−lk(αnu)du #

elkαnx )

(6)

calculating the limit ∆α→0 and assuming R−∞∞ |f(u)|du <∞,

= lim

∆α→0

1 14π

X

−∞,n6=0

("Z L

−L

f(u)e−i(αnu)du #

eiαnx+...

+

"Z L

−L

f(u)e−lj(αnu)du #

eljαnx+ "Z L

−L

f(u)e−lk(αnu)du #

elkαnx )

∆α.

From the definition of the Riemann integral, we obtain

= 1 14π Z ∞ −∞ Z ∞ −∞

f(u)e−i(αu)du

eiαx+

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−j(αu)du

ejαx+

...+

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−lj(αu)du

eljαx +

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−lk(αu)du

elkαx

dα.

Or equivalently, we get

1 14π Z ∞ −∞ Z ∞ −∞

f(u)e−i(αu)du,

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−j(αu)du,

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−k(αu)du,

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−l(αu)du,

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−li(αu)du,

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−lj(αu)du,

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−lk(αu)du

(eiαx, ejαx, ekαx, elαx, eliαx, eljαx, elkαx)

dα, (8)

considering the notations

Ti = Fi(α) =

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−i(αu)du,

Tj = Fj(α) =

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−j(αu)du,

Tk = Fk(α) =

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−k(αu)du,

Tl = Fl(α) =

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−l(αu)du,

Tli = Fli(α) =

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−li(αu)du,

Tlj = Flj(α) =

Z ∞

−∞

f(u)e−lj(αu)du,

Tlk = Flk(α) =

Z ∞

−∞

(7)

the equation (8) can be written as

e

f(x) = 1 14π

Z ∞

−∞

h(Fi(α), Fj(α), Fk(α), Fl(α), Fli(α), Flj(α), Flk(α)),

(eiαx, ejαx, ekαx, elαx, eliαx, eljαx, elkαx)dα. (9)

We define Octonionic Fourier Transform as

FO(α) =TO{f(x)}= (Fi(α), Fj(α), Fk(α), Fl(α), Fli(α), Flj(α), Flk(α)).

The inverse transform is calculated by the equation

T−O1{FO(α)}=

1 14π

Z ∞

−∞

FO(α),(eiαx, ejαx, ekαx, elαx, eliαx, eljαx, elkαx)

dα.

Now we present below a numerical example for the Octonionic Fourier Transform calculation.

Example 1. Consider the function

f(x) =

1, for −π < x <0, −1, for 0< x < π.

Computing the Octonionic Fourier Transform we obtain

FO(α) = TO{f(x)}

= 2

icos(απ)−1 α , j

cos(απ)−1 α , k

cos(απ)−1

α ,

lcos(απ)−1 α , li

cos(απ)−1 α , lj

cos(απ)−1 α , lk

cos(απ)−1 α

.

3.1. Convolution Transformation

In general, the convolution is defined as a product between two functions (f and g) that produces a third function, which is typically seen as a modified version of the original functions, then we define the convolution product between two functions as follows.

Letf andgbe completely integrable functions, we define the convolution product as the function

(f∗g)(x) =

Z ∞

−∞

f(x−u)g(u)du=

Z ∞

−∞

(8)

Theorem 2. IfFO(α)andGO(α)are the Octonionic Fourier Transform off(x)

andg(x), respectively, then the convolution transform of each of the octonionic units is equal to the product of these corresponding transforms, that is,

Tδ{fg}=Fδ(α)Gδ(α), (11)

whereδ∈ {i, j, k, l, li, lj, lk}andFδ(α) =Tδ{f(x)} eGδ(α) =Tδ{g(x)}.

Proof. We will demonstrate for δ=i. So we have to:

Ti{f g}=

Z ∞

−∞

(f∗g)e−iαxdx=

Z ∞

−∞

Z ∞

−∞

f(x−u)g(u)du

e−iαxdx.

Consideringe−iαx=e−iαue−iα(x−u), obtain

Ti{f∗g}=

Z ∞

−∞

Z ∞

−∞

f(x−u)g(u)du

e−iαue−iα(x−u)dx.

By changing the order of integration, we get:

Ti{fg}=

Z ∞

−∞ g(u)

Z ∞

−∞

f(x−u)e−iα(x−u)dx

e−iαudu.

By the change of variable, we consider

x−u=v⇒x=u+v⇒dx=dv.

It follows that

Ti{fg} =

Z ∞

−∞ g(u)

Z ∞

−∞

f(v)e−iαvdv

| {z }

Fi(α)

e−iαudu,

= Fi(α) Z ∞

−∞

g(u)e−iαudu=Fi(α)Gi(α).

In order to determine the corresponding transform of the other units j, k, l, li, lj, lkis used in the same way.

Letu, v in Rn, then we define the element-by-element operation as follows:

u⊗v= (u1, ..., un)⊗(v1, ..., vn) = (u1v1, ..., unvn).

Theorem 3. IfFO(α)andGO(α)are the octonions Fourier transforms off(x)e

g(x), respectively, is the Fourier transform of the convolution off∗gcorresponding to the product⊗of these corresponding transforms, that is,

(9)

Proof. From the definition of the octonionic transform and the convolution we obtain

TO{f∗g}= (Ti{f ∗g},Tj{f∗g},Tk{f∗g},Tl{f∗g},

Tli{fg},Tlj{f g},Tlk{fg}),

= (Fi(α)Gi(α), Fj(α)Gj(α), Fk(α)Gk(α), Fl(α)Gl(α),

Fli(α)Gli(α), Flj(α)Glj(α), Flk(α)Glk(α)),

= (Fi, Fj, Fk, Fl, Fli, Flj, Flk)⊗(Gi, Gj, Gk, Gl, Gli, Glj, Glk),

=FO(α)⊗GO(α).

Example 4. The Dirac delta (see [8]) can be poorly thought as a function on the real line which is zero everywhere except at the origin, where it is infinite,

δ(x) =

(

+∞, x= 0 0, x6= 0

and which is also constrained to satisfy the identityZ

−∞

δ(x)dx= 1.

The delta function is a tempered distribution and, therefore, it has a well-defined Fourier transform,

Ti(δ(ξ)) =

Z ∞

−∞

e−2πixξδ(x)dx= 1.

Thus, calculating

FO(α) = TH(δ(ξ)),

= (Fi(α), Fj(α), Fk(α), Fl(α), Fli(α), Flj(α), Flk(α)),

= (1,1,1,1,1,1,1),

consequently we obtain

T−1

O (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) =

1 14π

Z ∞

−∞

(1, ...,1),(eiαx, ..., elkαx)dα,

= δ(ξ).

Thus from equation (12) we get

TO{f∗δ}=TO{f},

(10)

4. Conclusion Remarks

In order to generalize the Fourier transform to its octonionic form, first we described Fourier series and we introduced the hypercomplex model by considering results from [8, 9, 12], which are able to obtain a formulation for octonionic Fourier transform, which depends on an internal product. Furthermore, since not few models of Theoretical Physics may be analyzed through the geometry and algebra of hypercomplex, it will be our concern to concentrate the next steps in making all possible applications of our results in the context of unified physical theories for higher dimensional space-times.

References

[1] L. Sinegre, Quaternions and the motion of a solid body about a fixed point ac-cording to Hamilton, Rev.-Historie-Math., No 1 (1995), 83-109.

[2] T.Y. Lam,Handbook of Algebra, Vol. 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam (2003), 429-454.

[3] S. Eilenberg, I. Niven, The fundamental theorem of algebra for quaternioins,Bull. Amer. Math. Society,50(1944), 246-248.

[4] C.A. Pendeza, M.F. Borges, J.M. Machado, C. Oliveira, De Moivre extended equation for octonions and the power series, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics,45, No 2 (2008), 165-170.

[5] J. Mar˜ao, M.F. Borges, Liouville’s theorem and power series for quaternionic func-tions,International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 71, No 3 (2011), 383-384.

[6] C.A.P. Martinez, M.F. Borges, A.L.M. Martinez and E.V. Castelani, Fourier series for quaternions and the extension of the square of the error theorem,International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 25(2012), 559-570.

[7] C.A.P. Martinez, M.F. Borges, A.L.M. Martinez and E.V. Castelani, Square of the error octonionic theorem and hypercomplex Fourier series, Tendˆencias em Matem´atica Aplicada e Computacional,14 (2013), 483-495.

[8] N. Jacobson,Basic Algebra I, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1974.

[9] C.A.P. Martinez, A.L.M. Martinez, Alternative to the hypercomplex Fourier trans-form definition, International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 29, No 6 (2016), 717-725; DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v29i6.5.

[10] M.F. Borges and J.A. Mar˜ao, Geometrical wave equation and the Cauchy-like theorem for octonions, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics,

79(2012), 426-459.

(11)

[12] M.F. Borges and L.F. Benzatti, Quasi-conformal mappping in octonionic algebra: A grafical and analytical comparison,Far East J. of Mathematical Sciences, 33

(2009), 355-361.

[13] C. Castro, On the non-commutative and non-associative geometry of octonionic space-time, modified dispersion relations and gran unifications,J. of Mathematical Physics,48(2007), Art. 073517.

[14] C.A. Deavours, The quaternionic calculus, The American Mathematical Montly,

80 (1973), 995-1008.

References

Related documents

In Interest/Data packet forwarding phase, a consumer broadcasts an interest packet within its vicinity and selects a neighbor node as a best forwarder whose intersection

% The first half of the sampled values of x are the spectral components for % positive frequencies ranging from 0 to the Nyquist frequency 1/(2*dt) % The second half of the

For climate change mitigation purposes, the value of a carbon sink is in its physical existence, not in the protection of a legal fiction represented by a piece of paper, the piece

These patterns suggest that the finding of self-affine scaling behaviour in the test based on the FA(1) estimator might be attributable to returns having been drawn from

We present radio, optical/NIR, and X-ray observations of the afterglow of the short-duration GRB 130603B, and uncover a break in the radio and optical bands at ≈ 0.. GRB 130603B is

This second part of the shock id done by a homogeneous shock on the intermediate consumption taxes (rtfd and rtfi) of those sectors where agriculture is directly interconnected.

461 [5] The variability of tephra preservation across multiple sites within the study area 462 suggests that northern Scandinavian peatlands may be an unreliable source of

Approaches include selecting varieties which contain low levels of acrylamide precursors (free asparagine and reducing sugars); removing precursors before process- ing (Friedman