• No results found

Building Capacity Through Charge Nurses

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Building Capacity Through Charge Nurses"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Building Capacity Through Charge Nurses

Washington County Health System/ Meritus Medical Center

Program/Project Description.

WCHS/MMC examined quality and patient safety data (nursing care hours, nurse satisfaction, core measures, patient satisfaction, hospital acquired infection rates, etc) and determined we had opportunities to positively impact patient centered care and employee satisfaction. Goals: lower length of stay by improving patient flow; increase nursing capacity to deliver patient centered care through unit-based charge nurses; to enhance the paitent expeirence through improved patient safety and quality metrics.

Process.

A team formed to examine the quality and patient safety indicators; the team conducted a literature review of nurse staffing models; models were evaluated against the dual objectives of improved patient care and increasing nurse satisfaction. The implementation of a clinical-based resource person without an assisgnement 24/7/365 on each unit was determined to be the best 'fit' for WCHS/MMC.

Solution.

The team conducted a literature review on the charge nurse role: charge nurse job descriptions, charge nurse competencies, characteristics of effective charge nurses, charge nurse training, charge nurse devleopment. A three phase implemenation resulted: Charge Nurse Classroom Training; Charge Nursing Clinical Orientation/Preceptorship; Monthly Charge Nurse Roundtables

Measurable Outcomes.

As of September, 2010, the charge nurse role has been implemented on three units, with plans to expand to all inpatient units. Mixed method evaluations include staff surveys and charge nurse roundatbles. Phase One Evaluations were comprised of charge nurse evaluation sessions, staff nurse survey, and a manager focus group. Phase One evaluations from charge nurses revealed revealed staff resistance, role confusion, and the need for ‘real time’ role revision. Phase One feedback from staff nurses are positive; see attached for survey summary. Phase One findings from the clinical manager focus group indicate satisfaction with the role at the leadership level. Unanticipated gains reported (qualitative) by staff nurses and charge nurses include inter-unit coordination, charge nurse job satisfaction, and chaos management. NDNQI nursing care hours indicate an increase in nurse hours at the bedside since implementation of the charge nurse role. Phase Two evaluations in survey form will be distributed in February to all nursing staff. The annual Nursing Staff Satisfaction Survey will be implemented in April, 2011.

Sustainability.

Monthly charge nurse roundtables are scheduled to ensure ongoing role development/skill building sessions (ie. crucial conversations, crisis management, patient flow, service recovery). A charge nurse email distribution is used to provide for a consistent method of communication and a sense of group identify. 10 charge nurses attended a one day Charge Nurse training in Baltimore in October, 2010 and will faciliate a teach and learn for the larger group. The clinical manager focus group requested that the charge nurse group devise a list of charge nurse duties and prioritize this list to create consistency in the role; the charge nurses will address this in the November Roundtable. Several units have created their own monthly charge nurse meetings.

Role of Collaboration and Leadership.

The charge nurse role was the result of Nursing Leadership, Medical Staff Leadership, and Quality and Patient Safety coordinating to improve patient safety and to increase nursing satisfaction, nursing quality indicators, physician satisfaction, and patient satisfaction. Nursing leadership, nursing education, medical staff services, and quality worked with a core team of clinical nurses, clinical educators, and nurse managers to research and devise the charge nurse role. Nursing leadership teamed with quality, nursing education, and human resources and development to plan for training and implementation of the new charge nurses. Nursing leadership demonstrated support and commitment for this new role by direct involvment: the Chief Nursing Officer steps into the role of preceptor for the charge nurses for two 12 hour shifts on the unit several times a month.

Contact Person Ellen Rice

Title

Quality Manager

Email

[email protected]

(2)

Charge
Nurse
Survey
(N=23)


Likert
Scale
1
(strongly
disagree)
to
5
(strongly
agree)


Q3:
Charge
Nurses
w/out
an
assignment
have
made
a
difference
on
my
unit=
3.52


Q4:
Charge
nurses
without
an
assignment
have
made
a
difference
in
patient
care
on
my
unit=
3.68


Q5:
Charge
nurses
without
an
assignment
have
made
a
difference
in
patient
satisfaction
on
my
unit=


3.20


Q6:
I
actively
seek
the
assistance
of
the
charge
nurse=
3.75


Q7:
Charge
nurses
without
an
assignment
have
not
impacted
my
unit=
2.64


Q8:
Charge
nurses
without
an
assignment
have
enabled
me
to
complete
my
duties
during
my
scheduled


shift=
3.28


Q9:
Charge
nurses
without
an
assignment
have
impacted
the
quality
of
care
on
my
unit=
3.44


Q10:
Charge
nurses
without
an
assignment
have
made
a
difference
in
my
patient
care=
3.46


COMMENTS:


• Help
of
Charge
Nurse
can
improve
pt
errors,
decrease
pt
falls,
and
improve
pt
outcomes


• Staff
not
involved
in
choosing
Charge
Nurse
and
some
were
picked
that
staff
feels
are
not


leaders


• Charge
Nurse
works
when
CN
takes
initiative


• Want
Charge
Nurse
to
say
“I
will
help
you
with
this,”
not
ask


• Some
of
our
charge
nurses
make
a
difference,
keep
the
unit
flowing
smoothly,
while
a
few
have


used
their
time
to
side
and
do
committee
work,
talk
on
the
phone


• I
think
the
charge
nurse
position
is
a
good
thing
and
could
be
useful
to
my
unit
if
the
right


person
is
doing
the
job
and
has
the
proper
training
as
to
what
their
duties
are


• Some
charge
nurses
function
well
and
are
very
helpful,
others
take
advantage
and
do
a
lot
of


socializing
and
aren’t
helpful


• Assigned
too
many
patients,
charge
nurses
not
able
to
help
as
much
as
needed
due
to
all
his/her


responsibilities


• It
really
depends
on
who
the
charge
nurse
out
of
staffing
,
some
nurses
are
better
at
supporting


the
other

staff
then
others


• This
last
week
4
charge
nurses
trained,
there
was
a
huge
difference
between
the
two
sets,
…the


personalities
of
the
four
that
trained
vary
so
greatly.


• There
can
be
a
vast
difference
in
the
amount
of
assistance
you
receive
as
a
fellow
co‐worker


depending
on
who
is
charge
nurse
that
day;
I
still
think
some
of
their
roles/duties
need
to
be


defined


(3)

• Previously
acted
as
“resource”
nurse
on
unit
without
an
assignment,
I
am
not
a
charge
nurse
but


I
know
how
much
of
a
burden
lifted
to
not
have
patients‐
I
am
able
to
get
out
closer
to
“on


time”
since
we
have
a
charge
nurse
without
an
assignment


• Please
don’t
stop
this
position!


• Please
do
not
continue
to
add
to
their
duties,
let
them
have
time
to
be
a
resource
to
floor
staff


10/6/10


(4)

11/3/10
Clinical
Manager
Charge
Nurse
Focus
Group:
Where
are
we?


• Couldn’t
function
without
CN


• Flow
of
patients


• Has
the
units
big
picture


• Have
the
plan


• d/c
phone
calls
(difficult
to
accomplish)


• not
doing
safety
checks


• some
inconsistency
(all
units)


• throughput‐
main
focus


• brainstorming
about
DU/turning
team


• “leaders”
can
get
things
done
faster


• Some
get
too
tied
up,
can’t
say
no


• Some
nurses
take
advantage


• Divert
inappropriate
admissions


• Support
to
newer
nurses


• Point
person
for
the
CM
(3
units)


• Created
a
rift
between
some
staff
“why
was
I
not
chosen?”


• Need
to
empower
the
CN
to
take
a
stand


• Need
training
in
crucial
conversations


• Staff
now
committed
(after
initial
resistance)


• Care
management:
CN
coordination‐
LINK


• Unintended
effects
on
staffing
and
budget‐
negative


CM
want
CN
to
have:


• Defined
guidelines
for
roles
and
responsibilities


• Group
identity
to
enforce
consistency


• Training
in
Crucial
Conversations


(5)

ST

AFFI

NG


FO

R


O

U

T

C

O

M

E

S:


B

U

IL

D

ING


C

AP

AC

IT

Y


T

H

R

O

U

G

H


C

H

AR

G

E


NU

R

SE

S


S

o

lv

in

g


th

e


Q

u

a

lit

y


D

ile

m

n

a

O

pe

ra

ti

o

na

li

zi

ng


C

ha

rg

e


Nu

rs

e

s






C

ha

ll

e

ng

e

s:








U

n

a

nt

ic

ipa

te

d
G

a

ins

:


E

v

al

u

at

ion

:













L

o

n

g


T

e

rm


G

o

a

ls

:


S

ta

ff


r

e

si

sta

n

ce












I

n

te

r‐

uni

t


co

o

rdi

na

ti

o

n

1

st


p

h

a

se


s

ta

ff


s

u

rv

e

y
9

/1

0












D

e

cr

e

a

se


L

O

S

S

ta

ffi

n

g












C

h

a

rg

e


N

u

rs

e


s

a

ti

sf

a

ct

io

n

1

st


p

h

a

se


C

M


v

ia


f

o

cu

s


gr

o

u

p












D

e

cr

e

a

se


F

a

ll

s


Bu

d

g

e

t









D

e

cr

e

a

se


i

n


e

nd


o

f


shi

ft


‘

cr

unc

h

’


1

st


pha

se


C

N


v

ia


r

o

und

ta

bl

e


9

/1

0












D

e

cr

e

a

se


I

n

ci

d

e

n

ts

U

n

it


re

st

ru

ct

u

ri

n

g








C

h

a

o

s


M

a

n

a

g

e

m

e

n

t


2

nd


p

h

a

se


s

u

rv

e

ys


2

/1

1












D

e

cr

e

a

se


H

A

I


O

n

g

o

in

g


e

va

lu

a

tio

n

/r

e

vis

io

n






















I

m

p

ro

ve


p

a

ti

e

n

t
s

a

ti

sf

a

ct

io

n












I

m

p

ro

ve


n

u

rs

e


s

a

ti

sf

a

ct

io

n












I

m

p

ro

ve


M

D


s

a

ti

sf

a

ct

io

n












I

m

p

ro

ve


S

3


s

co

re

s













P

ro

v

id

e


e

xc

e

ll

e

n

ce


i

n


c

a

re

References

Related documents

Two studies reported on overall abuse (physical and emotional combined); one evaluated a brief session of advocacy for abused women attending an accident and emergency

Coppin State University MD State University of New York College at Plattsburgh NY Frostburg State University MD State University of New York College at Potsdam NY

Our Public Health program should consider incorporating academic service learning and community-based participatory research to promote student engagement in the

features – skills and abilities Examples of affordances based on research evidence Technology in practice – how technology is actually used Organizational goals

NB! Use rowing if the weather conditions allow training on water. If strong winter conditions and snow; use cross-country skiing as endurance training.. **) = Lightweight

It is revealed that RBs are likely to be high for a significant minority of graduates in all three countries, but that for prospective students in Indonesia and Vietnam the

All Artists are expected to dedicate their time and to engage with enthusiasm/ participation/contribution to all class-work and exercises.. Two unexcused absences will bring the

According to Dolce, three different masters for the young Titian: Sebastiano Mezzato, Gentile Bellini,.. Giovanni