• No results found

IST 301. Class Exercise: Simulating Business Processes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "IST 301. Class Exercise: Simulating Business Processes"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

IST 301

Class Exercise: Simulating Business Processes Learning Objectives:

− To use simulation to analyze and design business processes. − To implement scenario and sensitivity analysis

Consider an ice cream stand with only one server as follows:

Stand Queue Inter arrival times Customers Server System

Assume that the stand is open from 8am to 8pm without any interruption (12-hour working day). Customers arrive at the stand at random time intervals. Based on a study, the owner assessed that the time between two consecutive customer arrivals is 8 minutes on the average. The owner did another study and found out that it takes 7 minutes on the average with a standard deviation of 30 seconds to serve a customer.

The owner wishes to calculate the following performance measurements for the stand. 1. How long does a customer wait in the line on the average? (Average waiting time

in the queue)

2. On the average, how long does it take to serve a customer (cycle time=(The time that customer leaves the stand)-(the time that customer arrives at the stand) ? 3. On the average, what is number of customers waiting in the line? (Average queue

length)

4. What percent of the time the server is busy with serving customer and what percent of the time idle? (Resource utilization)

In this exercise, we will help the owner to answer questions above using simulation.

As-Is Process

The As-Is process model for the ice cream stand is given as follows: Process Diagram

Role=Server

Organizational Units=Ice cream stand

Process Calendar

(2)

Performance Indicators

As-Is Process To-Be Process 1 To-Be Process 2 Avg. Cycle Duration Avg. Process Duration % Utilization of Resources Avg Queue Length Max Queue Length Avg Waiting Duration in Queue To-Be Process 1

The simulation study showed that the As-Is process is unacceptable mainly due to long waiting lines and times. Therefore, the owner has decided to hire one more server. However, he/she wishes to learn how much improvements on the performance indicators can be achieved by hiring an additional server.

Queue Inter arrival times Customers Stand Server Server

Surprisingly, we have the same business process model.

Simulation Parameters:

In this case, there are two servers instead of one. You can enter this information in Resource Allocation Tab of the Simulation Setup Window.

(3)

To-Be Process 2

The owner wants to investigate possibility of job specialization. So, the job of serving customer is divided into two tasks, serving customers and processing payments. The owner expects that the total process times will be shorter due to specialization. The process model and estimated times are given in the following figure.

Role=Server, Cashier

Organizational Units=Ice cream stand

Scenario Analysis using simulation

To-Be process 2 seems to be a better alternative. However, the owner is not satisfied with the results and asks following questions:

• What if the customer arrival rate is increased? For example, if 12 customers arrive in an hour on the average ( 5 min inter arrival time) instead of current 7.5 customers ( 8 min inter arrival time)? Would be to-be process 2 still better? • What if a bus full of customers show up at the same time (30 customers). Which

alternative will perform better?

Performance Indicators (5 min inter arrival time) To-Be Process 1 To-Be Process 2 Avg. Cycle Duration Avg. Process Duration % Utilization of Resources Avg Queue Length Max Queue Length Avg Waiting Duration in Queue

Performance Indicators (30 customers arrive at the same time) To-Be Process 1 To-Be Process 2

Avg. Cycle Duration Avg. Process Duration % Utilization of Resources Avg Queue Length Max Queue Length Avg Waiting Duration in Queue

(4)

Sensitivity Analysis Using Simulation

The owner is still suspicious of the results. He/She thinks that serving time of 3.0 min per customer is an optimistic estimate for the server. He/She wants to learn the serving time of the server that will make To-be process 2 worse than To-be process 1.

To-Be Process 1 To-Be Process 2 (Server 3.5 min per customer) To-Be Process 2 (Server 4 min per customer) To-Be Process 2 (Server 5 min per customer) Avg. Cycle Duration Avg. Process Duration % Utilization of Resources Avg Queue Length Max Queue Length Avg Waiting Duration in Queue

As-Is Process To-Be Process 1 To-Be Process 2 Avg. Cycle Duration 68.69 12.33 10.32 Avg. Process Duration 68.69 12.33 10.32 % Utilization of Resources 97% 57% 41.24/49.79 Avg Queue Length 9 1 1/1 Max Queue Length 16 5 5/1 Avg Waiting Duration in Queue 30.98 3.75 2.55/.36

Performance Indicators Increased Customer Demand (5 min inter arrival time) To-Be Process 1 To-Be Process 2

Avg. Cycle Duration 22.75 16.94 Avg. Process Duration 22.75 16.94 % Utilization of Resources 84% 61.46/74.72 Avg Queue Length 4 3/1 Max Queue Length 15 15/1 Avg Waiting Duration in Queue 8.48 6.35/.28

Performance Indicators (a bus full of customers) To-Be Process 1 To-Be Process 2 Avg. Cycle Duration 54.27 13.33 Avg. Process Duration 54.27 13.33 % Utilization of Resources 99% 42.03/82.31 Avg Queue Length 14 1 Max Queue Length 28 4

(5)

To-Be Process 1 To-Be Process 2 (Server 3.5 min per customer) To-Be Process 2 (Server 4 min per customer) To-be Process 3 (Server 4 min per customer) Avg. Cycle Duration 12.33 11.53 14.55 22.27 Avg. Process Duration 12.33 11.53 14.55 22.27 % Utilization of Resources 57% 33.85/47.39 40.85/65.85 40.62/81.89 Avg Queue Length 1 1 2 2 Max Queue Length 5 7 5 8 Avg Waiting Duration in Queue 3.75 4.48 4.51 7.58

References

Related documents

1997-1998 Director of Master’s by research in Finance (Mphil-University de Grenoble) 1997-1998 Head of Research team in Finance (University de Grenoble). 

Making sacramental wine requires special attention and care, starting with qvevri washing and marani hygiene and ending with fermentation, aging and storage. During

Bayes rule, Dempster-Shafer rule and Full Bayes Updating rule imply consequentialism but do not imply dynamic consistency if the capacity is not necessarily additive.. CKL

Instrument approach navigation predicated upon the GNS 530’s GPS Receiver must be accomplished in accordance with approved instrument approach procedures that are retrieved from

• The unique horizontal wicking action increases absorption capacity, reducing odour and unsightly bulking..

We show sample image registration results for qualitative evaluation of the proposed method. Figure 4.6 and Fig.4.8 show image slices from two different patients having tumors

Residential/Commercial Design & Engineering Free 30 Min Phone Consultation for RASM members Free Two Business Day Turn Around on Reports. CAROTTI ENGINEERING Structural

TABLE V - Mean concentrations of curcuminoid pigments in pig ear skin (µg pigment/g skin) during in vitro skin permeation studies of different formulations containing curcumin