• No results found

Available electronically at

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Available electronically at"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Available for sale to the public from- U.S. Department of Commerce

National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Road

Alexandria, VA 22312 Phone: 800-553-6847 Fax: 703-605-6900 Email: orders@ntis.gov

Online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx

Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge

Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from-

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62

Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 Phone: 865.576.8401 Fax: 865.576.5728

(3)

DOE/NV--1507

ANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT

FY 2012

Radioactive Waste Shipments

to and from the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS)

August 2013

United States Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration

Nevada Field Office Las Vegas, Nevada

(4)
(5)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION………...7

2.0 SUMMARY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE SHIPMENTS AND VOLUMES DISPOSED………..………7

2.1 Waste Transporters (Motor Carriers) ………..9

2.2 Shipments ... ………..9

2.3 Transportation Routes ………11

2.4 Transportation Route Reporting….………....15

3.0 INCIDENT/ACCIDENT DATA………15

4.0 EVALUATION OF SHIPPING CAMPAIGNS………...16

5.0 REFERENCES……….…16

6.0 POINTS OF CONTACT………..16

7.0 ACRONYM LIST………..17

(6)
(7)

7

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report satisfies the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) commitment to prepare an annual summary report of radioactive waste shipments to and from the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Radioactive Waste Management Site (RWMS) at Area 5. This report summarizes the fiscal year (FY) 2012 low-level radioactive waste (LLW) and mixed low-level radioactive waste (MLLW) shipments. This report was prepared in accordance with Section 4.1.1 (Commitments) of the “Nevada Test Site Environmental Impact Statement, Mitigation Action Plan” (February 1997) specifications.

Tabular summaries are provided which include the following:  Sources of and carriers for LLW and MLLW shipments to and from the NNSS;

 Number and external volume of LLW and MLLW shipments;  Highway routes used by carriers; and

 Incident/accident data applicable to LLW and MLLW shipments.

In this report shipments are accounted for upon arrival at the NNSS, while disposal volumes are accounted for upon waste burial.

2.0 SUMMARY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE SHIPMENTS AND VOLUMES DISPOSED

Total LLW and MLLW Received from Off-site Generators

A total of 811,202 ft3 of LLW and MLLW was disposed at the NNSS by 24 approved radioactive waste generators in 1,007 shipments. These shipments were transported using 16 approved motor carriers (including government vehicles).

Total NNSS On-site LLW/MLLW

Two approved NNSS on-site radioactive waste generators disposed 9,986 ft3 of LLW/MLLW in 34 on-site transfers. Government vehicles were used for these transfers.

Table 1 provides a summary of inbound (off-site and on-site) and outbound shipments. Note that NNSS generators may ship waste offsite for treatment prior to returning to the NNSS for disposal. Table 2 provides a list of approved waste generators that shipped to/on the NNSS in FY 2012.

(8)

Table 1. NNSS Inbound, On-site and Outbound Shipments Summary Inbound Off-site Generators NNSS Generators Approved Carriers Shipments Volume ft3 LLW / MLLW (off-site) 23 1 16 1,007 811,202 LLW / MLLW (on-site) 0 2 1 34 9,986 Totals 1,041 821,188

Outbound NNSS Generator Approved

Carriers

Shipments Volume ft3

MLLW 1 1 2 1,006

Totals 2 1,006

Table 2. Approved Generators Shipping To/On the NNSS in FY 2012

APPROVED GENERATOR, STATE GENERATOR CODE

1 ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD AP 2 ADVANCED MIXED WASTE TREATMENT PROJECT, ID AM 3 ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY, IL AE 4 BABCOX & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICES Y-12, TN BW 5 BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, ID NE 6 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY, NY BR 7 DURATEK/ENERGYSOLUTIONS, TN DR 8 ENERGX ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY, IL EN 9 GENERAL ATOMICS, CA BG 10 IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY, ID IN 11 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY, CA LL 12 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY, NM LA 13 NATIONAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES LLC, NV DP 14 NAVARRO-INTERA LLC, NV IT 15 NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES, TN NF 16 OAK RIDGE RESERVATION, TN OR 17 PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT, KY PD 18 PANTEX PLANT, TX PX 19 PERMA-FIX (M&EC), TN, WA, CA PF 20 PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT, OH PO 21 SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES, NM SA 22 SAVANNAH RIVER SITE, SC SR 23 UT-BATTELLE / OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY,

TN OL 24 WASTREN ADVANTAGE INC., TN FW

(9)

9

2.1 Waste Transporters (Motor Carriers)

Motor carriers operate in compliance with Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), “Transportation,” and are selected by the waste generator. Generators often use more than one motor carrier to facilitate their shipments. Table 3 provides a list of the approved carriers used to transport LLW and MLLW shipments to the NNSS. Government trucks were used for on-site transfers of LLW and MLLW.

A total of 20 LLW shipments bound for the NNSS were transported via

intermodal (rail/highway) conveyance. These shipments were transported from Nuclear Fuel Services (Tennessee) via rail to a siding in Parker, Arizona where they were offloaded and transported via approved motor carrier to the NNSS.

Table 3. Approved Motor Carriers Used in FY 2012

APPROVED MOTOR CARRIER CARRIER CODE

1 AJ METLER MAJH

2 BUFFALO FUEL CORPORATION BUFI 3 CAST TRANSPORTATION COLO

4 FLUID TRANSPORTS FLAI 5 GOVERNMENT VEHICLE GT+ 6 HITTMAN TRANSPORT HITT 7 HUBBARD TRUCKING HTAL 8 INTERSTATE VENTURES ITSV 9 LANDSTAR LIGON LIGS 10 LANDSTAR RANGER LRGR 11 MP ENVIRONMENTAL MPES 12 R & R TRUCKING RRUK 13 RSB LOGISTICS RSBI 14 SAVAGE LOGISTICS SVGH 15 TRI-STATE MOTOR TRANSIT TSMT 16 VISIONARY SOLUTIONS VSOL

2.2 Shipments

Table 4 provides a summary of all LLW and MLLW off-site shipments and Table 5 provides a summary of on-site transfers of LLW and MLLW. Note in Table 4, Nevada generator National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec) transported two shipments of MLLW off-site for treatment that were returned from Texas to the NNSS for disposal.

(10)

Table 4. Off-site Shipments of LLW and MLLW Transported to the NNSS

Off-site Inbound Shipments Shipments by Quarter

Generator, State 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND,

MD 0 0 5 2 7

ADVANCED MIXED WASTE

TREATMENT PROJECT, ID 0 5 12 19 36

ARGONNE NATIONAL

LABORATORY, IL 4 4 2 3 13

BABCOX & WILCOX TECHNICAL

SERVICES Y-12, TN 38 30 21 30 119

BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE,

ID 4 12 9 12 37

BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL

LABORATORY, NY 0 2 3 3 8

DURATEK/ENERGYSOLUTIONS,

TN 49 49 9 6 113

ENERGX ARGONNE NATIONAL

LABORATORY, IL 12 0 0 0 12

GENERAL ATOMICS, CA 0 0 4 0 4

IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY,

ID 10 7 10 5 32

LAWRENCE LIVERMORE

NATIONAL LABORATORY, CA 4 4 46 15 69

LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL

LABORATORY, NM 13 0 3 7 23

NATIONAL SECURITY

TECHNOLOGIES, NV 2 1 7 0 10

NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES, TN 13 14 15 33 75

OAK RIDGE RESERVATION, TN 52 97 41 23 213 PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION

PLANT, KY 6 1 2 8 17

PANTEX PLANT, TX 0 2 1 1 4

PERMAFIX (M&EC), TN, WA, CA 21 29 30 17 97

PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS

DIFFUSION PLANT, OH 3 7 1 13 24

SANDIA NATIONAL

LABORATORIES, NM 3 0 1 7 11

SAVANNAH RIVER SITE, SC 0 0 0 20 20

UT-BATTELLE/OAK RIDGE

NATIONAL LABORATORY, TN 1 5 1 2 9

WASTREN ADVANTAGE INC., TN 5 6 1 4 16

WEST VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICES, NY 12 21 2 3 38 Total Shipments 252 296 226 233 1,007

(11)

11

Table 5. NNSS on-site Transfers of LLW and MLLW

On-site Transfers Shipments by Quarter

Generator, State 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total National Security Technologies, NV 10 6 2 15 33

Navarro-Intera, LLC, NV 0 0 0 1 1

Total 10 6 2 16 34

2.3 Transportation Routes

Twenty-four approved radioactive waste generators shipped LLW and MLLW to the NNSS for disposal in FY2012. Table 6 provides the specific transportation routes used by each generator and the number of shipments. Figures 1 and 2 provide graphical representation of the general cross country and regional transportation routes, respectively.

(12)

Table 6. Shipment Summary of Off-site, Inbound Regional Routes by Generator for FY2012

* 20 of the 75 shipments from NF were shipped via rail to Parker, AZ then transported via motor carrier to the NNSS.

DESCRIPTION AE AM AP BG BR BW DP DR EN FW IN LA LL NE NF* OL OR PD PF PO PX SA SR WV TOTAL I‐15, CA‐127, CA‐178, NV‐ 372, NV‐160, US‐95  81 53 134 I‐15, CA‐127, NV‐373, US‐95  4 1 13 18 I‐15, NV‐160, US‐95  1 1 I‐40, I‐15, NV‐160, US‐95  1 1 I‐40, US‐93, AZ‐68, NV‐163,  US‐95, NV‐164, I‐15, CA‐127,  NV‐373, US‐95  1 1 I‐40, US‐93, AZ‐68, NV‐163,  US‐95, NV‐164, I‐15, NV‐160,  US‐95  2 2 3 7 I‐40, US‐95, NV‐164, I‐15, CA‐ 127, CA‐178, NV‐372, NV‐ 160, US‐95  1 1 I‐40, US‐95, NV‐164, I‐15, CA‐ 127, NV‐373, US‐95  1 1 I‐40, US‐95, NV‐164, I‐15, US‐ 95 (non‐approved) 1 I‐40, US‐95, NV‐164, I‐15, NV‐ 160, US‐95  7 1 119 8 24 10 16 23 3 4 74 8 211 14 80 23 4 11 20 661 I‐80, US‐93‐ALT, US‐6, US‐95  12 32 4 5 3 13 1 16 38 124 US‐50, US‐6/50, US‐6, US‐95  1 2 1 4 US‐93, US‐6, US‐95  4 29 20 1 54 13 36 7 4 8 119 10 113 12 16 32 23 69 37 75* 9 213 17 97 24 4 11 20 38 1007

(13)
(14)
(15)

15

2.4 Transportation Route Reporting

As a result of obligations made by former DOE Secretary Richardson, NNSS inbound radioactive waste shipments through the Las Vegas I-15 and US-95 Interchange (Spaghetti Bowl) have essentially ceased since FY 2000.

The NNSA/NFO continues to engage in discussions with radioactive waste generators regarding avoiding the Las Vegas Metropolitan Area. The NNSS Waste Acceptance Criteria includes wording requiring generators to notify their carriers to avoid this area.

Due to the events of September 11, 2001, tractor trailers continue to be restricted from travel near the Hoover Dam. Radioactive waste transportation to the NNSS, regardless of U.S. Department of Transportation classification, shall avoid the O’Callaghan-Tillman Memorial Bridge (i.e., Hoover Dam Bypass Bridge).

There was one shipment transported through the Spaghetti Bowl in FY 2012. The generator was notified of the violation and a Corrective Action Request was issued. There were no shipments transported on the O’Callaghan-Tillman Memorial Bridge.

The NNSA/NFO also continues to prepare quarterly reports that disclose transporter routes. These reports may be found on the Internet at

http://www.nv.energy.gov/emprograms/transportationreports.aspx

3.0 INCIDENT/ACCIDENT DATA

There were no U.S. Department of Transportation reportable transportation incidents involving LLW or MLLW being transported to the NNSS. For the purpose of this report, an incident is defined as a traffic-related accident, a load shift, or a reported leaking/breached package which occurs during transportation of LLW or MLLW.

Radioactive waste generators are instructed to notify the NNSA/NFO Assistant Manager of Environmental Management whenever a discrepancy, non-compliance, or inadequate performance is identified; or if a transportation incident or emergency situation occurs.

NSTec, a contractor to the NNSA/NFO, controls NNSS radioactive waste receipt and disposal activities and is responsible for notifying appropriate personnel regarding any non-compliant or refused shipments. NSTec personnel also immediately notify generators of any shipping discrepancies.

(16)

4.0 EVALUATION OF SHIPPING CAMPAIGNS

No off-site or on-site shipment experienced a transportation incident, as defined in Section 3.0.

5.0 REFERENCES

Shipment information is recorded at the NNSS Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site by NSTec Waste Management Program personnel. These records provide detailed information on each LLW and MLLW shipment, including the date received, generator, number and package type, volume, weight, carrier, and final disposition. In addition, incident and accident information is collected from NSTec and NNSA/NFO correspondence and personal communications with NNSA/NFO managers, NSTec personnel, waste generators, and carrier personnel. Route information is collected from the NNSA/NFO quarterly routing reports generated by NNSA/NFO.

The following source documents are incorporated by reference:

 U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, “Mitigation Action Plan - Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada Test Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada” DOE/EIS 0243, Las Vegas, Nevada, February 1997.

 U.S. Department of Transportation Regulations, 49 CFR, “Transportation,”

Code of Federal Regulations, Office of the Federal Register, National

Archives and Records Administration, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2012.

6.0 POINTS OF CONTACT

Please contact the following personnel with questions regarding radioactive waste transportation, waste management, or NNSA/NFO operations.

Nohemi Brewer, Transportation Program Manager U.S. Department of Energy

National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office

Environmental Management Operations P.O. Box 98518

Las Vegas, NV 89193-8518 (702) 295-4800

(17)

17

7.0 ACRONYM LIST

ft3 Cubic Feet

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

DOE U.S. Department of Energy

FY Fiscal Year

LLW Low-Level Radioactive Waste

MLLW Mixed Low-Level Radioactive Waste

NNSA/NFO National Nuclear Security Administration, Nevada Field Office NSTec National Security Technologies, LLC

NNSS Nevada National Security Site

RWMS Radioactive Waste Management Site

8.0 DISTRIBUTION LIST

U.S. Department of Energy

National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office

Public Reading Facility c/o Nuclear Testing Archive P.O. Box 98521

Las Vegas, NV 89193-8521 U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62

References

Related documents

After familiarizing ourselves with the forex market, TradeStation, and EasyLanguage, we looked at the different market types (trending, directionless, and volatile), and the

Compare Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) Contract with Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) Put Option Premiums for Similar Coverage.. LRP & Put do NOT expire on the same

Thus, the application controlling the PS must connect to the input devices (GPS and ZNC) via serial ports in order to read data (NMEA and sensor messages) from them, and it

Ensemble hindcasts (by perturbing model parameters) and deterministic hindcasts (using the optimal para- meters set) were carried out and compared with the detrended long-term

favorable dalam jumlah yang seimbang. Dengan demikian pernyataan yang disajikan secara berimbang mengandung unsur positif dan negatif yang seolah-olah memihak atau tidak

Using course tools, in one semester she: (1) was offered $45,000 more at work, (2) got $90 back from checks the bank bounced in error, (3) got $100 from Continental Airlines

Similarly, regarding the previous cohort of workers, we show theoretically that the impatience effect may affect the impact of delaying retirement on the firing and the hiring rates

Although we focused on the relationships between the frontline employee’s own choices of display strategies (i.e., surface acting and deep acting) and their inner feelings