• No results found

Adverse Impact and Test Validation Book Series: Multiple Regression. Introduction. Comparison of Compensation using

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Adverse Impact and Test Validation Book Series: Multiple Regression. Introduction. Comparison of Compensation using"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Adverse Impact and Test

Validation Book Series:

Multiple Regression

Using Multiple Regression to Examine Compensation Practices

Introduction

• Reasons for Investigating Pay Equity:

– The Equal Pay Act of 1963

– Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

• Employers may wish to examine Compensation

between groups – Tools available:

oIndependent Samples t-Test (t-Test) oMultiple Regression (MR)

Comparison of Compensation using

t

-Test:

• Pros:

– Simple to conduct – Easy to understand • Cons:

– Doesn’t account for any legitimate reasons for differences in pay

(2)

Comparison of Compensation using MR:

• Cons:

– Requires much more data

– Requires deeper understanding of statistics/statistical analyses

• Pros:

– Includes explanatory variables

– Better reflects real-world compensation structure – Endorsed by OFCCP

Steps for Conducting MR Analyses

• Consider Purpose: Proactive or Reactive?

– Proactive:

oTypically Employer-initiated oData build is simpler – Reactive:

oTypically externally-initiated (Plaintiff or Government Agency) oData build must be thorough

Step 1 – Identify and Review Available Data

• Establish a solid understanding of the data

(3)

Step 1 – Identify and Review Available Data

• Standard variables to consider:

– Employee ID

– Job Grouping Information (e.g. Job Title, Job Group, other Similarly Situated Employee Group (SSEG) information)

– Race/Ethnicity – Gender

– Date of Last Degree Earned – Highest Degree Earned – Date of Birth – Time in Company

– Time in Current Position (Time in Job)

Step 1 – Identify and Review Available Data

• Standard variables to consider (con’t):

– Current compensation (Annual Salary or Hourly Wage) – Part-time vs. Full-time status

– Exempt vs. Non-exempt status – Job Title

– Grade Level or Salary Band – Employee Location

– Prior Experience data (many types) – Performance Ratings – Etc.

Step 1 – Identify and Review Available Data

• Select variables which best mirror on-the-ground

compensation decisions

– Are variables Categorical or Continuous? oE.g. Education: “Any Degree?” vs. “Highest Degree”

• Choose Variable Formats appropriately

– Text – Date – Number – Currency – Etc.

(4)

Step 2 – Create and Verify Variable

Coding

• Focal Group: – Females – Total Minority – Individual Minorities • Reference Groups: – Males – Whites

Step 2 – Create and Verify Variable

Coding

• Focal Group should be coded as “1”; Reference

Group should be coded as “0” – e.g. “Female”“1,” “Male”“0” – e.g. “Minority”“1,” “White”“0” – e.g. “African American”“1,” “White”“0”

Step 3 – Conduct Preliminary Data

Analysis

• Generate Correlation Matrix

–In SPSS

oClick: Analyze Correlate Bivariate… oIdentify variables

–In Excel

oData Analysis ToolPak: Select Correlation oIdentify range containing variables

(5)

Step 3 – Conduct Preliminary Data

Analysis

• Examine Correlation Matrix

– Is there a statistically significant correlation between Gender/Race and Compensation?

– What other variables are correlated with Compensation? – Are there any large correlations between any of the

explanatory variables? (This could lead to multicollinearity, discussed later)

Note: This is done without accounting for SSEG’s, and as such is informative rather than analytical.

Step 4 – Create Groups of Employees for

Analysis

• Size of Employee Groups plays a large role in Statistical Power (i.e., the ability to detect a statistically significant difference if it exists to be found)

– Larger Groups favor those who seek statistically significant differences (e.g. Plaintiffs, OFCCP, EEOC)

– Smaller Groups favor those who seek no statistically significant differences (e.g. Defendants, Employers)

Step 4 – Create Groups of Employees for

Analysis

• Groups should represent Employees that are similarly situatedwith respect to:

– Work performed

– Levels of responsibility required – Skills needed

(6)

Step 5 – Conduct MR Analysis

• Using Microsoft Excel

• Using SPSS

Step 5 – Conduct MR Analysis Using

Excel

• Verify the Analysis ToolPak is Installed

Step 5 – Conduct MR Analysis Using

Excel

• Prepare Data worksheet

– Dependent (Compensation) Variable in Column A – Independent variables in Columns B and on

– Grouping variable (Gender or Race) in the column following all explanatory variables

(7)

Step 5 – Conduct MR Analysis Using

Excel

• To bring up the Data Analysis Menu:

– For Excel 2007/2010, select the “Data” tab on the Ribbon, then click “Data Analysis” (at the right end of the ribbon) – For Excel 2003, click on the “Tools” menu, then the “Data

Analysis” menu option

• On the Data Analysis Menu, Select “Regression”

Step 5 – Conduct MR Analysis Using

Excel

• Select Range containing Compensation

information for “Input Y Range”

• Select Range containing explanatory information

up to Gender/Race for “Input X Range”

• Check the “Confidence Interval” Box • If the data has field names, also check the

“Labels” box

• Click “OK”

Step 5 – Conduct MR Analysis Using

Excel: Interpret Initial Results

• Under “Regression Statistics,” check the R-Square

value

• In the ANOVA section, check the “Significance F” value for Regression

• Evaluate the p-Values for the independent variables

(8)

Step 5 – Conduct MR Analysis Using

SPSS

• Run Analysis

– Regression Diagnostics and supplemental statistical procedures

Step 5 – Conduct MR Analysis Using

SPSS

• Interpret Initial Results

– Review the model summary – Review the ANOVA Report – Review the Coefficients Report – Multicollinearity

– The key to the interpretation

– Interaction Terms: When two variables create a third

Step 6 – Conduct a Cohort Analysis

• For all SSEG’s with an statistically significant

differences, investigate whether there is additional information which may also contribute to Compensation decisions.

• Examples include:

– Previous Salary – Prior Experience – Publishing History

References

Related documents

Funding: Black Butte Ranch pays full coost of the vanpool and hired VPSI to provide operation and administra- tive support.. VPSI provided (and continues to provide) the

Persistence and degradability: No data available Bioaccumulative potential: No data available Mobility in soil: No data available Other adverse effects: No data available. DOT:

Thirteen of the 18 participants were negatively affected by the use of corporal punishment in at least one of three ways: (a) after the implementation of corporal punishment,

А для того, щоб така системна організація інформаційного забезпечення управління існувала необхідно додержуватися наступних принципів:

As you may recall, last year Evanston voters approved a referendum question for electric aggregation and authorized the city to negotiate electricity supply rates for its residents

A successful use of this specialty discipline allows the user to seize and redirect energy attacks aimed at him (Beam weapons, electrical current, sonic waves, etc) so as to

Journal of Applied and Natural Science 11(1): 23- 34 (2019) ISSN : 0974-9411 (Print), 2231-5209 (Online) journals.ansfoundation.org Composition, richness and floristic

translation literariness. Skopos theory is regarded as a guiding principle in Yu Bufan’s translation process. Through analyzing translation methods with examples, it is found that