Chapter 15
Geologic Resources:
Mineral Resource
• Concentration of naturally occurring
material in or on the earth’s crust that can
be extracted and processed into useful
Nonrenewable resources
• Not renewed in our lifetime • Metallic minerals – Fe, Cu, Al
ore- rock containing enough metallic mineral to be mined profitably
• Nonmetallic minerals – Salt, clay, sand phosphates, soil
General Classification of Nonrenewable
Mineral Resources
• The U.S. Geological Survey classifies mineral resources into four major categories:
– Identified: known location, quantity, and quality or existence known based on direct evidence and measurements.
– Undiscovered: potential supplies that are
assumed to exist.
– Reserves: identified resources that can be
extracted profitably.
Getting More Minerals from the Ocean
• Hydrothermal
deposits form
when mineral-rich
superheated water
shoots out of vents
in solidified
Locating Mineral Resources
• Arial photos, satellites
• Aircraft with radiation measuring equipment (for uranium) and magnetometers (for iron)
• Deep well drilling • Seismic surveys
Types of Mining Techniques
• Minerals are removed through a variety of methods that vary widely in their costs, safety factors, and levels of environmental harm.
• A variety of methods are used based on mineral depth.
Surface Mining
• Mechanized equipment strips away the
overburden
(layer of soil and rock
overlying a mineral deposit) and discards it
as
spoils
• Accounts for 60% of coal in US
Surface Mining:
Open-pit Mining
• Machines dig
holes and
remove ores,
sand, gravel,
and stone.
• Toxic
groundwater
Open Pit Mining
•
http://www.montereyinstitute.org/courses/
Dredging
• Chain buckets,
Area Strip Mining
• Earth movers
strips away
overburden, and
giant shovels
removes mineral
deposit.
• Often leaves
highly erodible hills
of rubble called
Strip Mining
•
http://www.montereyinstitute.org/courses/
Contour Strip Mining
• Used on hilly or
mountainous
terrain.
• Unless the land is
restored, a wall of
dirt is left in front
of a highly
erodible bank
called a
Mountaintop Removal
• Machinery
removes the tops
of mountains to
expose coal.
Restoration of Surface Mined Land
• Achievable in all but arid and semiarid areas • Expensive and not done in many countries
• Surface mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977: requires mining companies to restore
Subsurface Mining
• Dig vertical shaft, blast subsurface
tunnels, use machinery to remove ore and
transport to top
• Disturbs less land than surface mining
• Produces less waste, but leaves much of
resource in ground
• More expensive and dangerous
• Dangers: collapse of roof & walls,
explosions of dust & natural gas
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF
USING MINERAL RESOURCES
• The extraction, processing, and use of
Effects
• Scarring, disruption of land surfaces • Collapse or subsidence of land
• Wind, water erosion of toxin-laced mining wastes • Acid mine drainage – produced when aerobic
bacT act on iron sulfide minerals in spoils,
contaminates water supply, damages aquatic life • Emission of toxic chems into atmosphere
Mining Impacts
• Metal ores are
smelted or treated
with (potentially
Ore Processing
•
http://www.montereyinstitute.org/courses/
Life cycle of Metal Resource
smelting
• Gangue – waste • Tailings – waste
material
• Smelting – separation of desired metal from ore
• Uses massive energy • Air, water pollution
SUPPLIES OF MINERAL
RESOURCES
• Never completely run out of a mineral
resource but economically deplete it.
•
Economic depletion
- Costs more to find,
SUPPLIES OF MINERAL
RESOURCES
• Depletion curves
for a renewable
resource using
three sets of
assumptions.
SUPPLIES OF MINERAL
RESOURCES
• New technologies can increase the mining of
low-grade ores at affordable prices, but
harmful environmental effects can limit this
approach.
• Most minerals in seawater and on the deep
ocean floor cost too much to extract, and
SUPPLIES OF MINERAL
RESOURCES
• The future supply of a resource depends on
its affordable supply and how rapidly that
supply is used.
USING MINERAL RESOURCES MORE
SUSTAINABLY
• Scientists and engineers are developing new types of materials as substitutes for many
metals. Silicon, ceramics, plastics
Solutions
Sustainable Use of Nonrenewable Minerals • Do not waste mineral resources.
• Recycle and reuse 60–80% of mineral resources.
• Include the harmful environmental costs of mining and processing minerals in the prices of items (full-cost pricing).
• Reduce subsidies for mining mineral resources.
• Increase subsidies for recycling, reuse, and
finding less environmentally harmful substitutes.
• Redesign manufacturing processes to use less mineral resources and to produce less pollution and waste.
• Have the mineral-based wastes of one manufacturing process become the raw materials for other processes.
• Sell services instead of things.
TYPES OF ENERGY
RESOURCES
• About 99% of the energy we use for heat
comes from the sun and the other 1%
comes mostly from burning fossil fuels.
– Solar energy indirectly supports wind power, hydropower, and biomass.
• About 76% of the commercial energy we
use comes from nonrenewable fossil fuels
(oil, natural gas, and coal) with the
• Cultural changes and technological
advances have greatly increased energy
use per person
Trends in Energy Resources
• Global use of coal has declined – most polluting and climate-disrupting fossil fuel.
• US- largest user followed by China
• Use of oil climbs (?low prices, abundance and ease of use) Many fluctuations – post Katrina
• Natural gas use increasing - ? Ample supplies. Cleanest and least climate disrupting of fossil fuels
• Nuclear power leveled off – may change soon
• Biomass- in developing countries (fuel wood and charcoal made from wood) Leads to unsustainable
US Trends
• Largest user 24% with 4.6% of world’s pop
• 92% US energy from nonrenewable resources • World and US dependence on nonrenewable
Developing Energy Policies for the Future
• How much is available long and short term • What is net energy yield
• Cost of development and use • Gov’t role
• Effect on national and global & economic security • Vulnerability to terrorism
Net Energy
• the amount of high-quality usable energy
available from a resource after subtracting
the energy needed to make it available.
• Expressed as ratio – the higher the ratio
the greater the net energy
Fig. 16-4, p. 358
Space Heating
Space Heating
Passive solar 5.8
Natural gas
Oil 4.5
Active solar 1.9 Coal gasification 1.5 Electric resistance heating (coal-fired plant) 0.4
0.4
Electric resistance heating (nuclear plant) 0.3
High-Temperature Industrial Heat
High-Temperature Industrial Heat
28.2 Surface-mined coal
Underground-mined coal 25.8
Natural gas 4.9
Oil 4.7
Coal gasification 1.5 Direct solar (highly concentrated by mirrors,
heliostats, or other devices) 0.9
Transportation
Transportation
Natural gas 4.9
Gasoline (refined crude oil) 4.1 Biofuel (ethyl alcohol) 1.9
Coal liquefaction 1.4 Oil shale 1.2 Electric resistance heating (natural-gas-fired plant)
Example: Compare passive solar to nuclear plant
• Passive solar – high net energy – very little energy expended
• Nuclear – low net energy – requires much
OIL
• Crude oil (petroleum) is a thick liquid
containing hydrocarbons that we extract from
underground deposits and separate into
products such as gasoline, heating oil and
asphalt.
– Only 35-50% can be economically recovered from a deposit.
– As prices rise, about 10-25% more can be
recovered from expensive secondary extraction techniques.
OIL
• Refining crude oil:
– Based on boiling
points, components are removed at
various layers in a giant distillation
column.
OIL
• Eleven OPEC (Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries) have 78% of the
world’s proven oil reserves and most of the
world’s unproven reserves.
• After global production peaks and begins a
slow decline, oil prices will rise and could
threaten the economies of countries that
Case Study: U.S. Oil Supplies
• The U.S. – the world’s largest oil user –
has only 2.9% of the world’s proven oil
reserves.
• U.S oil production peaked in 1974
(halfway production point).
Trade-Offs
Conventional Oil
Advantages Disadvantages Ample supply for
42–93 years Need to find
substitutes within 50 years
Low cost (with huge subsidies)
Artificially low price encourages waste and discourages search for alternatives
High net energy yield
Easily transported within and between countries
Air pollution when burned
Low land use
Releases CO2 when burned
Technology is well developed
Efficient distribution
system Moderate water
Heavy Oils from Oil Sand and Oil
Shale: Will Sticky Black Gold Save
Us?
• Heavy and tarlike oils from oil sand and oil
shale could supplement conventional oil, but
there are environmental problems.
– High sulfur content.
– Extracting and processing produces:
• Toxic sludge
• Uses and contaminates larges volumes of water
Oil Shales
• Oil shales
contain a solid
combustible
mixture of
Trade-Offs
Heavy Oils from Oil Shale and Oil Sand
Advantages Disadvantages
Moderate cost (oil sand)
High cost (oil shale)
Low net energy yield
Large potential supplies,
especially oil sands in
Canada Large amount of water needed for processing Easily transported within and between countries Severe land disruption Severe water pollution Efficient distribution system in place Air pollution when burned
CO2 emissions when burned Technology is
NATURAL GAS
• Natural gas, consisting mostly of methane, is often found above reservoirs of crude oil.
– When a natural gas-field is tapped, gasses are liquefied and removed as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).
NATURAL GAS
• Russia and Iran have almost half of the
world’s reserves of conventional gas, and
global reserves should last 62-125 years.
• Natural gas is versatile and clean-burning
fuel, but it releases the greenhouse gases
carbon dioxide (when burned) and
NATURAL GAS
• Some analysts see
natural gas as the
best fuel to help us
make the transition
to improved energy
efficiency and
greater use of
COAL
COAL
• Coal reserves in the United States,
Russia, and China could last hundreds to
over a thousand years.
– The U.S. has 27% of the world’s proven coal reserves, followed by Russia (17%), and
China (13%).
COAL
• Coal is the most
abundant fossil fuel, but compared to oil and natural gas it is not as versatile, has a high environmental
COAL
• Coal can be converted into synthetic
natural gas (SNG or syngas) and liquid
fuels (such as methanol or synthetic
gasoline) that burn cleaner than coal.
– Costs are high.
COAL
NUCLEAR ENERGY
• Isotopes of uranium and plutonium undergo controlled nuclear fission
• Fuel - uranium oxide consists of about 97%
nonfissionable uranium-238 and 3% fissionable uranium-235.
– Concentration of uranium-235 is increased through an enrichment process.
– Dangerous to mine and purify- workers exposed to radon (lung ca)
Nuclear Fission
• Atom such as uranium-235 or plutonium-239 is split by no and massive amounts of energy are
released in a controlled chain reaction
• Reaction is moderated to control heat and
energy by cooling solution (absorbs neutrons) and by control rods (made of B or Cd)
Light Water Reactors
Fig. 16-16, p. 372 Small amounts of
radioactive gases Uranium fuel input (reactor core) Control rods Containment shell Heat exchanger
Steam Turbine Generator
Waste heat Electric power Hot coolant Useful energy 25%–30% Hot water output Pump Pump
Coolant Pump Pump
Moderator Cool water input Waste heat Shielding Pressure vessel Coolant passage Water Condenser Periodic removal and
storage of radioactive wastes and spent fuel assemblies
Periodic removal and storage of radioactive liquid wastes
Nuclear Energy
•
http://www.montereyinstitute.org/courses/
Types of Reactors
1. PWR – pressurized water, >70% of reactors
• Water circulates around fuel rods to remove heat primary coolant
• Primary coolant flows through tube in steam generator and produces high energy steam (heat transfer)
• Energy turns turbine (kinetic energy to mechanical energy)
• Steam leaving turbine is condensed and pumped back to steam generator
• Reactors encased in thick-walled concrete and steel • Operating properly, releases less radioactivity than a
coal-fired power plant.
2. Boiling water reactor
• More dangerous design
• Boiling water from reactor core is used to drive the turbine generators
• Highly radioactive water and steam leave the containment building
3. Canadian deuterium reactors CANDU
• Use heavy water D2O as cooling agent and moderator
• Can use naturally found unconcentrated uranium, eliminates expense of enrichment
4. Graphite
• Used as moderator and structural material for reactor core
• Britain – MAGNOX – cooling accomplished by CO2
• Soviet Design – similar but low pressure cooing water circulates through core in small metal
tubes
Disasters with Graphite Reactors
• Involved fires in graphite cores
• Nuclear fuel melted and escaped into the
atmosphere
• 1956 in England
Safety Concerns
• Biggest danger is cooling water system failure • Nuclear fuel can overheat, and meltdown can
result that releases deadly radioactive material (Chernobyl)
• Misconception – nuclear power plants don’t explode
• 2002 inspectors found that leaking boric acid
Alternative Reactor Designs
• PBMR Pebble Bed Modular reactor
• Uses uranium in ceramic-coated pellets surrounded by helium as cooling gas
• Can reload pellets during operations
• Problems with fires in control buildings and turbine-generators
• Can create 10X more radioactive wastes than traditional
Breeder Reactors
• Produce own fuel rather than consume it converts uranium-238 into plutonium-239 • Safety problems
• Uses liquid sodium as coolant – explosive component if contacts water
• Immediate meltdown if coolant is lost • Excess Pu could be used for bombs
• 1986 France put breeder reactor into operation, but closed after 1 year when crack was
Nuclear Fuel Cycles
• Each part produces low-level and high level waste
• Low level must be stored for 100 – 500 years before decaying to safe levels (generally
consider 10 - ½ lives)
• Contaminated tools, clothing, building materials • Before 1970, put into steel drums and dumped
into ocean
High level Radioactive Waste
• Must be stored safely for 10,000 years (uranium) and 240,000 years (if plutonium is not removed) • Spent fuel rods, wastes from nuclear weapons
manufacturing
• Presently fuel assemblies stored in deep water pools on site at nuclear power plants (read page 371)
• As pools fill, assemblies are stored in large metal dry casks outside power plants
Yucca Mountain, Nevada
• 1987 high level radioactive waste repository • Waste to be stored deep underground
• Scheduled to open 2010, but Obama administration says “NO”
• Requirements for High Level radioactive waste repository:
No geologic faults (no earthquakes) Low groundwater table
Fig. 16-18, p. 373 Decommissioning of reactor Fuel assemblies Reactor Enrichment
of UF6 Fuel fabricationFuel fabrication
(conversion of enriched UF
(conversion of enriched UF66
to UO
to UO22 and fabrication of and fabrication of fuel assemblies)
fuel assemblies) Temporary storage of Temporary storage of
spent fuel assemblies
spent fuel assemblies
underwater or in dry
underwater or in dry
casks
casks Conversion of
U3O8 to UF6
Uranium-235 as UF
Uranium-235 as UF66
Plutonium-239 as PuO
Plutonium-239 as PuO22
Spent fuel Spent fuel reprocessing reprocessing Low-level radiation Low-level radiation
with long half-life
with long half-life
Geologic disposal of moderate & high-level radioactive wastes Open fuel cycle today
NUCLEAR
ENERGY
• In 1995, the World Bank said nuclear
power is too costly and risky.
• In 2006, it was found that several U.S.
Coal vs. Nuclear
Trade-Offs
Coal Nuclear
Ample supply Ample supply of uranium
High net energy yield Low net energy yield
Very high air pollution Low air pollution (mostly from fuel reprocessing)
High CO2 emissions Low CO2 emissions (mostly
from fuel reprocessing)
High land disruption from
surface mining Much lower land disruption
from surface mining
Low cost (with huge subsidies) High cost (even with huge subsidies)
What Happened to Nuclear Power?
• After more than 50 years of development and
enormous government subsidies, nuclear power has not lived up to its promise because:
– Multi billion-dollar construction costs.
– Higher operation costs and more malfunctions than expected.
– Poor management.
Case Study: The Chernobyl
Nuclear Power Plant Accident
• The world’s worst nuclear power plant
accident occurred in 1986 in Ukraine.
• The disaster was caused by poor reactor
design and human error.
• By 2000, 8,000 people had died from
radiation –related diseases
NUCLEAR ENERGY
• Terrorists could attack nuclear power plants,
especially poorly protected pools and casks that store spent nuclear fuel rods.
• Terrorists could wrap explosives around small amounts of radioactive materials that are fairly easy to get, detonate such bombs, and
Nuclear Fusion
• Nuclear fusion is a nuclear change in which two isotopes are forced together.
– No risk of meltdown or radioactive releases. – May also be used to breakdown toxic material. – Still in laboratory stages. Uses deuterium and
tritium – isotopes of hydrogen
– Requires more energy to accomplish than would produce