• No results found

Vol 2, No 8 (2011)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Vol 2, No 8 (2011)"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Available online through

www.ijma.info

FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR FIVE MAPPINGS IN METRIC SPACE

Rajesh Shrivastava

*

, Sarvesh Agrawal, Ramakant Bhardwaj and Dr. R. N. Yadava

**

Department of Mathematics, Truba Group of Institutions Bhopal, INDIA

*Prof. & Head, Department of Mathematics, Govt. Science & Commerce College Benajeer, Bhopal, INDIA **

Director, Patel Group of Engineering Institutions, ratibad, Bhopal INDIA *E-mail: [email protected]

(Received on: 23-07-11; Accepted on: 07-08-11)

--- ABSTRACT

I

n this paper we prove a common fixed point theorem taking five mappings satisfying a weakly commuting condition. Our result generalize the results of Fisher [2], Pathak [9], Rao and Rao [10], Saluja and Dehariya [12].

Key Words: Fixed point, Metric Space, Weakly commuting Mappings.

Subject Classification: 47H10, 54H25.

--- 2. INTRODUCTION & PRELIMINARIES:

There are many generalization of Banach Contraction Principle. Some of them are obtained by adding the terms Kannan[8], Fisher[2], Rhoades[11] generalized this principle in many ways. Jaggi [5], Jaggi and Das [6] extended this principle for rational expression. On the same way Bhardwaj et. al., Yadava et.al. also worked for rational expression. Initially Jungck [7] proved a common fixed point theorem for commuting mappings. This result was extended and generalized in various ways by many authors. On the way Sessa [13] gave the concept of weak commutativity.

In the present paper we prove a fixed point theorem for five mappings taking weakly commuting condition for certain mappings. Our result is motivated by Pathak[9], Rao and Rao[10], Saluja and Dehariya [12].

Definition 2.1[3, 4]: Let K be a non empty subset of a metric space (X, d),

T K

:

X and F K

:

CB X

( )

. The pair (F,T) is said to be weakly commuting if for every

x y

,

K with x

Fy and Ty

K

,

we have

(

,

)

(

,

)

d Tx FTy

=

d Ty Fy

Definition 2.2[4]: Let K be a non empty subset of a metric space (X, d),

T K

:

X and F K

:

CB X

( )

. The pair (F,T) is said to be point-wise R-weakly commuting on K if for given

x

K and Tx

K

,

there exists some R=R(x)>0 such that

(

,

)

(

,

)

.

d Ty FTx

R d Tx Fx

for each y

K

Fx

Definition 2.3: Let R, S, T, U and V are five mappings of a metric space (X, d). Then the pair (R S, T U) is called weakly commuting pair of two mappings with respect to V if

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

2.3.1 , ,

2.3.2 , ,

2.3.3 , ,

2.3.4 , ,

d SVRSV x TUV x d RSVSV x TUV x

d RSV x UVTUV x d RSV x TUVUV x

d VRSV x TUV x d RSVV x TUVV x

d RSV x VTUV x d RSV x TUVV x

≤ ≤ ≤

3. MAIN RESULT:

Theorem 3.1: Let R, S, T, U and V are five self mappings of complete metric space (X, d) satisfying the conditions: (A) The pair (R, S, T, U) is weakly commuting pair of two mappings with respect to V.

---

(2)

Page: 1279-1285

© 2011, IJMA. All Rights Reserved 1280

( )

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2 , , ,

1 , , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

, , , , , , , 0 2 1 .

d x T U V y d y R S V x B d R S V x T U V y

d x T U V y d y R S V x d x T U V y d x y d y T U V y d x R S V x d y T U V y d y R S V x d R S V x T U V y d x y d x y

fo r a ll x y X x y w h e r e a n d

α

β γ

δ η

α β γ δ η α β γ δ η

+ +

+ +

+ +

∈ ≠ ≥ + + + + <

Then R, S, T, U and V have a unique common fixed point in X. Proof: Let

x

0be an arbitrary point of X. We define a sequence

{ }

x

n

by x

=

x

2 ,n

y

=

x

2n−1

and RSV x

(

2 ,n

)

=

x

2n+1

,

TUV x

(

2n−1,

)

=

x

2n

(

)

(

(

)

(

)

)

(

)

(

)

(

(

)

)

(

)

(

)

(

(

)

)

(

(

)

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

(

)

)

(

(

)

)

(

(

)

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2

2 2 1 2 2 1

2 2 1 2 1 2

2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1

2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2

2 2 1 2 1 2 2

, ,

, ,

1 , , , ,

, , , ,

, ,

n n n n

n n n n

n n n n n n n n

n n n n n n n n

n n n n

d x x d RSV x TUV x

d x TUV x d x RSV x

d x TUV x d x RSV x d x TUV x d x x

d x RSV x d x TUV x d x TUV x d x RSV x

d RSV x TUV x d x x d x

α

β

γ

δ

η

+ − − − − − − − − − − − − − − = ≤ + + + +

+ +

(

)

2

1, 2

n− xn

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

)

2 2 2 1 2 1

2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1

2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1

2

2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2

,

,

1

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

n n n n

n n n n n n n n

n n n n n n n n

n n n n n n

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

α

β

γ

δ

η

− + − + − + − − − + + − −

+

+

+

+

+

+

By using inequalities, we obtain

(

)

(

) (

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

) (

)

(

)

(

) (

)

(

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

)

2

2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1

2

2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2

2

2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1

2

2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

n n n n n n n n n n n n

n n n n n n

n n n n n n n n n n

n n n n n n

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

β

γ

δ

η

β

γ

γ

δ

η

+ + − − − + + − − + − − − + + − −

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

(

) (

) (

) (

) (

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

) (

)

2

2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2

2 2 2 2

2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2

,

,

,

.

.

,

,

,

,

,

2

n n n n n n

n n n n n n n n

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

Since A M

G M then

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

β

γ

δ

γ

η

β

γ

δ

γ η

+ − − + + − −

+ +

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2

2 2 1 2 1 2

2 2

2 2 1 2 1 2

3

2

,

,

1

2

,

,

n n n n

n n n n

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

k d x

x

β

γ

δ

η

β

γ

δ

+ − + −

+

+

+

+ +

(

)

(

)

(

)

1 2

2 2 1 2 1 2

3

2

1, sin

2

1.

1

2

3.1.1

n

,

n n

,

n

where k

ce

d x

x

k

d x

x

β

γ

δ

η

α

β

γ

δ η

β

γ

δ

+ −

+

+

+

=

<

+

+

+

+

<

+ +

(3)

Page: 1279-1285

Similarly on taking

x

=

x

2n+1,

y

=

x

2n

and RSV x

(

2n+1,

)

=

x

2n+2

,

TUV x

(

2 ,n

)

=

x

2n+1

in condition (3.1) (B), we obtain

(

)

(

(

)

(

)

)

(

)

(

)

(

(

)

)

(

)

(

)

(

(

)

)

(

(

)

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

(

)

)

(

(

)

)

(

(

)

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2

2 1 2 2 2 1 2

2 1 2 2 2 1

2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1

2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1

2 1 2 2 1 2 2

,

,

,

,

1

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

n n n n

n n n n

n n n n n n n n

n n n n n n n n

n n n n n

d x

x

d RSV x

TUV x

d x

TUV x

d x

RSV x

d x

TUV x

d x

RSV x

d x

TUV x

d x

x

d x

RSV x

d x

TUV x

d x

TUV x

d x

RSV x

d RSV x

TUV x

d x

x

d x

α

β

γ

δ

η

+ + +

+ +

+ + + +

+ + +

+ + +

=

+

+

+

+

+

+

(

1

,

x

2n

)

2

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

)

2 1 2 1 2 2 2

2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1

2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2

2

2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1

,

,

1

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

n n n n

n n n n n n n n

n n n n n n n n

n n n n n n

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

α

β

γ

δ

η

+ + +

+ + + + + +

+ + + + +

+ + + +

+

+

+

+

+

+

(

) (

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

) (

)

(

)

2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2

2

2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1

, , , , ,

, , ,

n n n n n n n n n n

n n n n n n

d x x d x x d x x d x x d x x

d x x d x x d x x

β

γ

δ

η

+ + + + + + +

+ + + +

≤ + +

+ +

(

) (

) (

) (

) (

)

(

)

(

)

(

) (

)

(

)

(

)

2

2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2

2 2 2

2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2

2 2

2 2 2 1 2 2 1

,

,

,

,

,

,

2

3

2

,

,

1

2

n n n n n n

n n n n n n

n n n n

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

d x

x

β

γ

δ

γ η

β

γ

δ

γ η

β

γ

δ

η

β

γ

δ

+ + + +

+ + + +

+ + +

+ +

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

+ +

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2

2 2 2 1 2 2 1

1 2

2 2 2 1 2 2 1

,

,

(3.1.2)

,

,

3

2

1, sin

2

1.

1

2

n n n n

n n n n

d x

x

k d x

x

d x

x

k d x

x

where

k

ce

β

γ

δ

η

α

β

γ

δ η

β

γ

δ

+ + +

+ + +

+

+

+

=

<

+

+

+

+

<

+ +

Hence by (3.1.1) and (3.1.2), we have

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

2

1 1

2 2

2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2

2 1 1 2

2 2 2 1 0 1

,

,

,

,

,

,

0

.

n n n n n n

n

n n

d x

x

k d x

x

k

d x

x

In general

d x

x

k

d x x

as n

+ + + −

+

+ +

→ ∞

Thus

{ }

x

n is a D-Cauchy sequence in X. Since X is complete, there exists a point

,

lim

n

.

n

p

X such that

x

p

→∞

=

(4)

Page: 1279-1285

© 2011, IJMA. All Rights Reserved 1282

( )

(

)

(

( )

(

)

)

(

)

(

)

(

( )

)

(

)

(

)

(

( )

)

(

(

)

)

(

)

( )

(

)

(

(

)

)

(

(

)

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2

2 2 2 1

2 1 2 1

2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1

2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1

2

2 1 2 1 2 1

, ,

, ,

1 , , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

n n

n n

n n n n

n n n n n

n n n

d RSV p x d RSV p TUV x

d p TUV x d x RSV p

d p TUV x d x RSV p d p TUV x d p x

d p RSV p d x TUV x d x TUV x d x RSV p

d RSV p TUV x d p x d p x

α

β

γ

δ

η

+ +

+ +

+ + + +

+ + + + +

+ + +

=

+ +

+ +

+ +

(

)

(

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

)

(

) (

)

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2 2 1

2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1

2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1

2

2 2 2 1 2 1

,

,

1

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

n n

n n n n

n n n n n

n n n

d p x

d x

RSV p

d p x

d x

RSV p

d p x

d p x

d p RSV p d x

x

d x

x

d x

RSV p

d RSV p x

d x

p

d x

p

α

β

γ

δ

η

+ +

+ + + +

+ + + + +

+ + +

+

+

+

+

+

+

( )

(

)

(

)

(

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

)

(

) (

)

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

2

2

lim

,

,

,

,

1

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

making

it n

we have

d p p d p RSV p

d RSV p

p

d p p d p RSV p

d p p d p p

d p RSV p d p p

d p p d p RSV p

d RSV p

p d p p

d p p

α

β

γ

δ

η

→ ∞

+

+

+

+

+

+

( )

(

)

( )

(

)

( )

2

, 0

, 0

.

d RSV p p

d RSV p p

which is possible only when RSV p p

=

( )

.

Similarly TUV p = p

Now, we shall prove that p is the common fixed point of RSV and TUV. Let q be another common fixed Point of RSV and TUV, then by condition (3.1)(B), we have

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2

2

, ,

, ,

1 , , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

d p q d RSV p TUV q

d p TUV q d q RSV p

d p TUV q d q RSV p d p TUV q d p q

d p RSV p d q TUV q d q TUV q d q RSV p

d RSV p TUV q d p q d p q

α

β γ

δ η

=

+ +

+ +

+ +

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

)

2

,

,

1

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

d p q d q p

d p q d q p

d p q d q p

d p p d q q

d q q d q p

d p q d p q

d p q

α

β

γ

δ

η

+

+

+

+

+

+

(

)

2

(

) (

)

2

,

,

, sin

2

1.

d p q

d p q

which is possible only when p

q

ce

α δ η

α

β

γ

δ η

+

+

=

+

+

+

+

<

Now, we shall show that SV and UV have a common fixed point.

(5)

Page: 1279-1285

( )

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

2 2 2

2

, , ,

, ,

1 , , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

d SV p p d SV R SV p T U V p d R SV SV p T U V p

d SV p T U V p d p R SV SV p

d SV p T U V p d p R SV SV p d SV p T U V p d SV p p

d SV p R SV SV p d p T U V p d p T U V p d p R SV SV p

d R SV SV p T U V p d SV p p d SV p p

α

β γ

δ η

= ≤

+ +

+ +

+ +

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

2

,

,

1

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

d SV p

p d p SV p

d SV p

p d p SV p

d SV p

p d SV p

p

d SV p

SV p

d p p

d p p d p SV p

d SV p

p d SV p

p

d SV p

p

α

β

γ

δ

η

+

+

+

+

+

+

( )

(

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

2

2 2

2

2

,

, ,

1 2 ,

,

, sin 2 1.

d SV p p

d SV p p d SV p p

d SV p p

d SV p p

which is possible only when p SV p ce

α

δ

η

α

δ

η

α

β

γ

δ

η

≤ + +

+

≤ + +

= + + + + <

Similarly, on taking x=p, y=UV (p), and applying definition (2.3.2), we have

( )

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

2 2 2

2

, , ,

, ,

1 , , , ,

, ,

, ,

, , ,

d p UV p d RSV p U VTU V p d RSV p TUVUV p

d p TU VUV p d UV p RSV p

d p TUVU V p d UV p RSV p d p TUVUV p d p U V p

d p RSV p d UV p TUVUV p

d U V p TUVUV p d U V p RSV p

d RSV p TUVUV p d p UV p d p UV p

α

β

γ

δ η

= ≤

+ +

+

+

+ +

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

2

,

,

1

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

d UV p

p d p UV p

d UV p

p d p UV p

d UV p

p d UV p

p

d p p d UV p UV p

d UV p UV p

d UV p

p

d UV p

p d UV p

p

d UV p

p

α

β

γ

δ

η

+

+

+

+

+

+

( )

(

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

)

2

2 2

2

2

,

, ,

1 2 ,

,

d U V p p

d U V p p d U V p p

d U V p p

d U V p p

α δ η

α δ η

≤ + +

+

≤ + +

( )

, sin

2

1.

which is possible only when p

=

UV p

ce

α

+

β

+

γ

+

δ

+

η

<

Thus

(3.1.3) SV (p) =UV (p) =p.

(6)

Page: 1279-1285

© 2011, IJMA. All Rights Reserved 1284

( )

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

2 2 2

2

, , ,

, ,

1 , , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

d V p p d VRSV p TU V p d RSVV p TU VV p

d V p TU VV p d p RSVV p

d V p TU VV p d p RSVV p d V p TU VV p d V p p

d V p RSVV p d p TU VV p d p TU VV p d p RSVV p

d RSVV p TU VV p d V p p d V p p

α

β γ

δ η

= ≤

+ +

+ +

+ +

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

2

, ,

1 , , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

d V p p d p V p

d V p p d p V p d V p p d V p p

d p p d V p V p d p p d V p p

d V p p d V p p d V p p

α

β γ

δ η

+ +

+ +

+ +

( )

(

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

2

2 2

2

2

,

, ,

1 2 ,

,

, sin 2 1.

d V p p

d V p p d V p p

d V p p

d V p p

which is possible only when p V p ce

α δ η

α δ η

α β γ δ η

≤ + +

+

≤ + +

= + + + + <

Similarly, on taking x=p, y=U(p) and applying definition (2.3.4), we have p = U(p). Thus

(3.1.4) U (p) = V (p) = p. Hence by (3.1.3) and (3.1.4), we have SV (p) = UV (p) =U (p) =V (p) = S (p) =p. Also by the uniqueness of p,

RSV (p) =TUV (p) =R(p) =T(p) =p.

Therefore, R(p) =S(p) =T(p) =U(p) =V(p) =p. Hence p is a common fixed point of R, S, T, Uand V.

Uniqueness: Let w be another common fixed point of R, S, T, U and V. Then by condition (3.1) (B), we have

(

)

(

( )

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

)

( )

(

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

(

( )

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

2 2

2

, ,

, ,

1 , , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

d p w d RSV p TU V w

d p TU V w d w RSV p

d p TU V w d w RSV p d p TU V w d p w

d p RSV p d w TU V w d w TU V w d w RSV p

d RSV p TU V w d p w d p w

α

β γ

δ η

=

+ +

+ +

+ +

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

) (

)

(

)

2

, ,

1 , , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

d p w d w p

d p w d w p d p w d w p

d p p d w w d w w d w p

d p w d p w d p w

α

β γ

δ η

+ +

+ +

(7)

Page: 1279-1285

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

) (

)

2

2 2

2

2

,

,

,

1 2

,

,

d p w

d p w

d p w

d p w

d p w

α

δ

η

α

δ η

+

+

+

+

+

,sin

2

1.

which is possible only when p

=

w

ce

α

+

β

+

γ

+

δ η

+

<

This completes the proof of the theorem. 4. REFERENCE:

[1] Bhardwaj, R. K., Rajput,S. S., Yadava, R. N., “Application of fixed point theory in metric spaces,” Thai Journal of Mathematics, Vol.5, No. 2 (2007), 253-259.

[2] Fisher, B., “Common fixed point and constant mapping on metric space,” Math. Sem. Notes, Kobe Univ., 5 (1979), 319.

[3] Hadzic, O., “On coincidence points in Convex metric spaces,” Univ. u Novom Sadu Zb. Rad. Prirod-Mat. Fak. Ser. Mat., 19 (2) (1986), 233-240.

[4] Hadzic, O.and Gajic, Lj., “ Coincidence points for set-valued mappings in Convex metric spaces,” Univ. u Novom Sadu Zb. Rad. Prirod-Mat. Fak. Ser. Mat., 16 (1) (1986), 13-25

[5] Jaggi, D. S., “Some fixed point theorems”, I.J.P. Appl., 8(1977), 223-230.

[6] Jaggi, D. S. and Das, B. K., “An extension of Banach’s fixed point theorem through rational expression,” Bull. Cal. Math. Soc., 72(1980), 261-264.

[7] Jungck, G., “Commuting mappings and fixed points,” Amer. Math. Monthly, 83 (1976), 261-263. [8] Kannan, R., “Some generalization of the Banach contraction theorem,” Kobe, VIII, Vol.3, (1975), 1-11.

[9] Pathak, H. K., “A note on fixed point theorems of Rao and Rao,” Bull. of Cal. Math. Soc., 79 (1987), 267-273. [10] Rao,I.N.N. and Rao, K. P. R., “ Common fixed point theorem for three mappings,” Bull. of Cal. Math. Soc., 76 (1984), 228.

[11] Rhoades, B. E., “A comparison of various definitions of contractive mappings,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 226(1976), 257-290

[12] Saluja, A. S. and Dehariya, R. D., “Fixed point theorem for five weakly commuting mappings,” J. Nanabha, Vol. 36 (2006), 119-124.

[13] Sessa, S., “On a weak commutativity condition of mappings in fixed point consideration,” Publ. Inst. Math., 32 (46) (1982), 149-153.

[14] Yadava, R. N., Rajput, S. S., Bhardwaj, R. K., “Some fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces,” Acta Ciencia India, Vol. XXXIIIM, NO. 2 (2007), 461-466.

[15] Yadava, R.N., Rajput, S. S., Bhardwaj, R. K., “Some fixed point and common fixed point theorems in Banach spaces,” Acta Ciencia India, Vol. XXXIIIM, NO. 2 (2007), 453-460.

References

Related documents

GM07492A (Human lung fibroblasts), MCF-7 (human breast adenocarcinoma), MO59J (human glioblastoma) and HeLa (human cervical adenocarcinoma)... 1: Chemical structures of

Besides, given that there is lack of an operational definition for frailty and sarcopenia, it would be a worthwhile endeavor to investigate the com- bined or sequential use of

Contaminated fresh vegetables in central markets of Khartoum state may play a significant role in transmis- sion of intestinal parasitic infections to humans, and the water used

Molecular evidence using enzyme and RAPD markers for sympatric evolution in British species of Tetramesa..

A pilot evaluation of the long-term effect of combined therapy with intravenous iron sucrose and erythropoietin in elderly patients with advanced chronic heart failure

If the concentration is proportional to the probability of creating a polyalanine of length m in a repeat expansion of length n, the corresponding equation is borne out by