• No results found

The variational iteration method for fuzzy fractional differential equations with uncertainty

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "The variational iteration method for fuzzy fractional differential equations with uncertainty"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

The variational iteration method for fuzzy

fractional differential equations with

uncertainty

Ekhtiar Khodadadi

1*

and Ercan Çelik

2

*Correspondence:

[email protected]

1Islamic Azad University, Malekan

Branch, Malekan, Iran Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Abstract

In this paper the variational iteration method is used to solve the fractional differential equations with a fuzzy initial condition. We consider a differential equation of

fractional order with uncertainty and present the concept of solution. We compared the results with their exact solutions in order to demonstrate the validity and applicability of the method.

Keywords: fuzzy number; fuzzy initial value problems; Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative; Mittag-Leffler function; variational iteration method

1 Introduction

With the rapid development of linear and nonlinear science, many different methods such as the variational iteration method (VIM) [] were proposed to solve fuzzy differential equations.

Fuzzy initial value problems for fractional differential equations have been considered by some authors recently [, ]. To study some dynamical processes, it is necessary to take into account imprecision, randomness or uncertainty. The uncertainty can be modeled by incorporating it into the dynamical system and considering fuzzy differential equations. Some recent contributions on the theory of differential equations with uncertainty can be seen in [].

Letq∈(, ],T>  andEbe the set of fuzzy real numbers [, ]. We consider a differential equation with uncertainty of the type

Dqu(t) =ft,u(t), t∈(,T], ()

wheref : [,T]×R→Ris continuous. We will consider this equation with some adequate initial condition for a givenu∈E:

• Iff : [,T]×R→Randu∈R, then () reduces to a fractional differential equation.

• Ifq= , then () is just a first-order fuzzy differential equation.

Here we combine both types of differential equations, of fractional order and with un-certainty, to consider a new type of dynamical system: fuzzy differential equations of frac-tional order []. The objective of the present paper is to extend the application of the varia-tional iteration method, to provide approximate solutions for fuzzy initial value problems

(2)

of differential equations of fractional order, and to make comparison with that obtained by an exact fuzzy solution.

2 Preliminaries

In this section the most basic notations used in fuzzy calculus are introduced. We start with defining a fuzzy number.

Definition  A fuzzy number (or an interval)uin parametric form is a pair (u,u) of func-tionsu(r),u(r), ≤r≤, which satisfy the following requirements []:

. u(r)is a bounded non-decreasing left continuous function in(, ]and right continuous at.

. u(r)is a bounded non-decreasing left continuous function in(, ]and right continuous at.

. u(r)≤u(r),≤r≤.

Definition  The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order  <q<  of a continu-ous functionf :R+Ris given by

Dqf(t) = 

( –q)

d dt

t

(ts)–qf(s)ds,

provided the right-hand side is pointwisely defined onR+.

3 Fuzzy fractional differential equations with uncertainty

Consider the following fuzzy fractional differential equation:

Dqu(t) =ft,u(t), () where  <q<  andf : [,TEEis a continuous function on [,TE.

A fuzzy functionuC((,T],E)∩L((,T),E) is a solution of fuzzy fractional

differen-tial equation () ifDquis continuous on (,T]; and assume that there exitsμ>  such that

the nonlinearityf is of the form

Dqu(t) =μu(t) +gt,u(t), t∈(,T], () where

Dqu(t) = 

( –q)

d dt

t

(ts)–qu(s)ds,

is the usual Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of orderqof the functionu: (,T]→

Randg: [,TEEis continuous.

Also, we can associate the following initial condition to fuzzy fractional differential equation ():

lim

t→+t

–qu(t) =u ∈E.

Lemma

(i) If there existslimt→+t–qu(t) =v,then there also existslimt+t–qu(t) =(q)v.

(3)

Proof (i) If there existslimt→+t–qu(t) =v, then for eachε> , we can chooseδ=δ(ε)

such that

dt–qu(t),v< ε

(q)

for|t|<δ. SinceI–qt–q=(q), we have

dD–qu(t),(q)v=dD–qu(t),D–qtq–v

= 

( –q)d

t

(ts)–qu(s)ds,

t

(ts)–qsq–ds

≤ 

( –q)

t

(ts)–qsq–dsq–u(s),vds<ε

which proves (i). Assertion (ii) is obvious [].

Hence, we define a solution of this Eq. () as a functionu: [,T]→Esuch that

u(t) =u(q)tq–Eq,q

μtq+ t

(ts)q–Eq,q

μ(ts)qgs,u(s)ds,

whereEα,βis the classical Mittag-Leffler function

Eα,β(z) =

k=

zk

(αk+β) (α> ,β> ).

Example  Consider the fractional differential equation

Dqu(t) = , t∈(,T].

The general solution of this equation [] is

u(t) =ceq–, c∈R. Imposing the initial condition

lim

t→+t

–qu(t) =u ,

we then have

u(t) =utq–.

In the fuzzy case, the solution is also

u(t) =utq–.

Now, letμ>  and  <q≤ and consider the equation

(4)

The solution is given by the following expression:

u(t) =(q)tq–Eq,q

μtqu.

4 Analysis of the variational iteration method

We consider the fractional differential equation

Dqu(t) =μu(t) +gt,u(t), t∈(,T] ()

with the fuzzy initial condition

lim

t→+t

–qu(t) =u ,

wheret∈(, ],  <q≤, andu∈Eis a fuzzy triangular number,

[u]α=

u(t,α),u(t,α) forα∈(, ].

According to the variational iteration method [], we construct a correction functional for () which reads

un+(t;α) =un(t;α)tq–

+ 

(q)

t

(tξ)q–λ(ξ;α)

∂qun

∂ξq (ξ;α) –μun(ξ;α) –g

ξ,un(ξ;α),

un+(t;α) =un(t;α)tq–

+ 

(q)

t

(tξ)q–λ(ξ;α)

∂qu

n

∂ξq (ξ;α) –μun(ξ;α) –g

ξ,un(ξ;α)

,

whereλandλare general Lagrange multipliers, which can be identified optimally via the variational, andunandunare restricted variations that areδun=  andδun= .

Therefore, we first determine the Lagrange multipliersλandλthat will be identified via integration by parts. Respectively, the successive approximationsun+(t;α)≥ and

un+(t;α)≥ of the solutionsu(t;α) andu(t;α) will be readily obtained upon using the

Lagrange multiplier obtained by using any selective functionsu(t;α) andu(t;α).

Con-sequently, the solutions are obtained by taking the limits:

u(t;α) = lim

n→∞un(t;α), u(t;α) =nlim→∞un(t;α). ()

Example  Consider the crisp differential equation

Dqu(t) = –u(t) ()

with the fuzzy initial condition

lim

t→+t

(5)

wheret∈(, ],  <q≤, andu= (||)∈E is a fuzzy triangular number, [u]α=

[ +α,  –α] forα∈(, ]. If we put [u(t)]α= [uα(t),uα

(t)], then [Dqu(t)]α= [Dquα(t),Dquα

(t)]. We obtain the sys-tem

Dquα(t) = –(t), lim

t→+t –quα

(t) =  +α,

Dquα(t) = –(t), lim t→+t

–quα

(t) =  –α,

or

Dqy(t) =Ay(t), lim

t→+t

–qy(t) =c, ()

where

y(t) =

(t)

(t)

, A=

 –

– 

, c=

 +α

 –α

.

Using the same method as that in [], we obtain the solution of (). It is given by

y(t) =tq–Eq,q

Atqc=tq–Eq,q

Atq

 +α

 –α

,

where

Eq,q

Atq= ∞

k=

(Atq)k (q(k+ ))=

k=

(tq)k (q(k+ ))

 – –  k = ∞ n=

(tq)n (q(n+ ))

 – –  n + ∞ n=

(tq)n+ (q(n+ ))

 – –  n+ = ∞ n=

(tq)n (q(n+ ))

    + ∞ n=

(tq)n+ (q(n+ ))

 –

– 

.

Then we obtain

(t) =u(t;α) =

n=

t(n+)q–

(q(n+ ))( +α) – ∞

n=

t(n+)q–

(q(n+ ))( –α),

(t) =u(t;α) = ∞

n=

t(n+)q–

(q(n+ ))( –α) – ∞

n=

t(n+)q–

(q(n+ ))( +α).

It easy to see that [(t),uα

(t)] define theα-level intervals of a fuzzy number. So, [u(t)]α

are theα-level intervals of the fuzzy solution of ()-(), []. To apply the VIM, first we rewrite Eq. () in the form

(6)

where the notationsL[u(t)] =∂tqqu,L[u(t)] = qu

∂tq andN[u(t)] =u(t),N[u(t)] =u(t)

symbol-ize the linear and nonlinear terms, [], respectively. The correction functionals for Eqs. () read

un+(t;α) =un(t;α)tq–

+ 

(q)

t

(tξ)q–λ(ξ;α)

∂qun

∂ξq (ξ;α) +N

un(ξ;α) ,

un+(t;α) =un(t;α)tq–

+ 

(q)

t

(tξ)q–λ(ξ;α)

∂qun

∂ξq (ξ;α) +Nun(ξ;α) .

()

Taking the variation with respect to the independent variablesunandun, and noticing

thatδN[u()] = ,δN[u()] = ,

δun+(t;α) =δun(t;α)tq–+ 

(q)δ

t

(tξ)q–λ(ξ;α)

∂qun

∂ξq (ξ;α)

,

δun+(t;α) =δun(t;α)tq–+

(q)δ

t

(tξ)q–λ(ξ;α)

∂qu

n ∂ξq (ξ;α)

,

()

forq∈(, ], we obtain for Eq. () the following stationary conditions:  +λ(ξ;α)|t=ξ= ,  +λ(ξ;α)|t=ξ = ,

∂qλ(ξ;α)

∂ξq

t=ξ

= ,

qλ(ξ;α)

∂ξq t=ξ = . ()

The general Lagrange multipliers, therefore, can be identified

λ(ξ;α) = –, λ(ξ;α) = –. ()

As a result, we obtain the following iteration formula:

un+(t;α) =un(t;α)tq–– 

(q)

t

(tξ)q–

∂qun

∂ξq (ξ;α) +un(ξ;α)

,

un+(t;α) =un(t;α)tq–

(q)

t

(tξ)q–

∂qun

∂ξq (ξ;α) +un(ξ;α)

.

()

As a result, we obtain the following iterative formula:

u(t;α) =(q)tq–Eq,q

tq( +α),

u(t;α) =(q)tq–Eq,q

tq( –α),

u(t;α) =(q)tq–Eq,q

tqtq–Eq,q

tq+tq–Eq,q

tq ( +α),

u(t;α) =(q)

tq–Eq,q

tqtq–Eq,q

tq+tq–Eq,q

tq ( –α),

u(t;α) =(q)

tq–Eq,q

tqtq–Eq,q

tqEq,q–

tq+tq–Eq,q

(7)

+ (q– ) ∞

(–)k ((k+ )q)

t(k+)q–

((k+ )q– )–t

q–E q,q

tq

( +α),

u(t;α) =(q)

tq–Eq,q

tqtq–Eq,q

tqEq,q–

tq+tq–Eq,q

tq

+ (q– ) ∞

(–)k ((k+ )q)

t(k+)q–

((k+ )q– )–t

q–E q,q

tq

( –α),

.. .

and so on. Thenth approximate solution of the variational iteration method converges to the exact series solution []. So, we approximate the solutionsu(t;α) =limn→∞un(t;α),

u(t;α) =limn→∞un(t;α). 5 Conclusion

The results of the study reveal that the proposed method with fractional Riemann-Liouville derivatives is efficient, accurate, and convenient for solving the fuzzy fractional differential equations.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors carried out the proof and conceived of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author details

1Islamic Azad University, Malekan Branch, Malekan, Iran.2Department of Mathematics, Atatürk University Faculty of

Science, Erzurum, Turkey.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the referees for valuable comments and suggestions which improved the presentation of this manuscript. This study was supported by The Scientific Research Projects of Atatürk University.

Received: 1 October 2012 Accepted: 21 December 2012 Published: 18 January 2013

References

1. Jafari, H, Saeidy, M, Baleanu, D: The variational iteration method for solvingn-th order fuzzy differential equations. Cent. Eur. J. Phys.10(1), 76-85 (2012)

2. Arshad, S, Lupulescu, V: Fractional differential equation with the fuzzy initial condition. Electron. J. Differ. Equ.34, 1-8 (2011)

3. Agarwal, RP, Lakshmikanthama, V, Nieto, JJ: On the concept of solution for fractional differential equations with uncertainty. Nonlinear Anal.72, 2859-2862 (2010)

4. Lakshmikantham, V, Mohapatra, RN: Theory of Fuzzy Differential Equations and Inclusions. Taylor & Francis, London (2003)

5. Diamond, P, Kloeden, PE: Metric Spaces of Fuzzy Sets. World Scientific, Singapore (1994)

6. Arshad, S, Lupulescu, V: On the fractional differential equations with uncertainty. Nonlinear Anal.74, 3685-3693 (2011)

7. Kilbas, AA, Srivastava, HM, Trujillo, JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

8. Junsheng, D, Jianye, A, Xu, M: Solution of system of fractional differential equations by Adomian decomposition method. Appl. Math. J. Chin. Univ. Ser. B22, 7-12 (2007)

9. Jafari, H, Tajadodi, H: He’s variational iteration method for solving fractional Riccati differential equation. Int. J. Differ. Equ.2010, Article ID 764738 (2010)

doi:10.1186/1687-1812-2013-13

References

Related documents

Bioassay was performed against laboratory reared and field collected larvae of test insects to study the influence of gut bacteria on susceptibility of lepidopteran pests

Conclusions: We were able to identify that sugarcane bagasse modification under acid and basic pretreatments change the water accessibility to different sites of the sample,

implementation should be filled. Examples of such gaps are i) limited knowledge of the causes of neurological diseases, and thus hypotheses about the best biomarkers to

Under this factor, different elements, like, inequality, organizational dependency and job esteem (in negative sense) and employment alternative (in positive sense) can be seen

Compared with Northern Taiwan (which has the lowest PM 2.5 levels), living in North-Central, Central, and Southern Taiwan was associated with lower blood AHRR methylation levels

A finite element model of RBCs is created based on Young’s modulus and hardness data obtained from the experiment for both control and smokers samples, in order to

Winter food habits of the Common Palm Civet Paradoxurus hermaphroditus (Mammalia: Carnivora: Viverridae) in Patna Bird Sanctuary, India.. Creative Commons Attribution

Therefore the increased levels of the nitrite in the brain of FLX (20 mg/kg, i.p.) treated stressed mice compromised the antidepressant effect of FLX (20 mg/kg, i.p.) in