• No results found

Safe Operation of Welded Structure with Cracks at Elevated Temperature

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Safe Operation of Welded Structure with Cracks at Elevated Temperature"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Strojniški vestnik - Journal o f Mechanical Engineering 54(2008) 11,807-816 UDC 62-112.81:624.014

Paper received: 20.12.2007 Paper accepted: 25.09.2008

Safe Operation of Welded Structure with

Cracks at Elevated Temperature

M eri B u rz ić ’ - R a d ic a P ro k ić -C v e tk o v ić 2 - B ilja n a G ru jič 3 - Iv an a A ta n a s o v s k a 4 - Ž iv o s la v A d a m o v ič 5

1 In stitu te "G O Š A " , B e lg ra d e , S erb ia

2 F a c u lty o f M e c h a n ic a l E n g in e e rin g , B e lg ra d e , S erb ia 3 In n o v a tio n C e n tre , B e lg ra d e , S erb ia 4 In stitu te "K irilo S av ič ", B e lg ra d e , S erb ia 5 F a c u lty o f T e c h n ic a l E n g in e e rin g , Z re n ja n in , S e rb ia

The fatigue crack growth rate param eters and conditions fo r abrupt fracture o f thick jo in t in steel at room and operating temperature were analysed. Fatigue cracks generated fro m sharp weld defects are initial cracks that grow through either the w eld jo in t region or the base metal in accordance with Paris law. Service life o f a welded structure depends on position and orientation o f the existing sharp weld defect. Different pre-cracked specimens were used in this experimental investigation.

They were cut from the base and w eld metals and heat-affected zone. In comparison with the base metal, w eld jo in t region show ed higher crack growth rate at operating and room temperatures. Fatigue crack growth rate was higher at operating temperature irrespective o f the position. Reliability o f structure with initial longitudinal cracks positioned in the heat-affected zone was lower than with initial transversal cracks located in the weld metal.

© 20 0 8 Jo u rn al o f M e c h a n ic a l E n g in e e rin g . A ll rig h ts rese rv e d .

Keywords: welded structures, fatigue cracks, fracture toughness, proof test

0 IN T R O D U C T IO N

W e ld d e fe c ts a rise in m a n u fa c tu re o f w eld ed stru c tu re s. D u rin g n o rm a l o p e ra tio n o f such stru c tu re s, sh a rp d e fe c ts in w e ld jo in t reg io n act as sites fro m w h ic h fa tig u e c ra c k s fo rm a n d th en g ro w . C ra c k s o f c ritic a l siz e je o p a r d iz e stru ctu ra l in te g rity . D u e to th e c o m p le x n a tu re o f fu sio n w e ld in g an d h u m a n fa c to r, th e size, lo catio n , ty p e , a n d o rie n ta tio n o f d e fe c ts c a n n o t b e p re d ic te d . O n ly a th o ro u g h p o st- m a n u fa c tu re in sp e c tio n o f w e ld jo in ts p ro v id e s n e c e s sa ry in fo rm a tio n a b o u t th e a c tu a l w e ld d e fe c t p re s e n c e in w e ld e d stru ctu re s.

T h e m o s t je o p a r d iz in g ty p e o f sh a rp w e ld d efe cts are tw o -d im e n s io n a l d e fe c ts o rie n te d n o rm al to th e d ire c tio n o f flu c tu a tin g stress. T h e ir d irec t e ffe c ts o n th e s tre n g th o f w e ld jo in ts are tre a te d as th e e ffe c ts o f c ra c k s (c ra c k -lik e d efects). F ra c tu re m e c h a n ic s is u s e d to a s se ss th e se v erity o f m a c ro s c o p ic tw o -d im e n s io n a l d efe cts in re la tio n to d e s ig n lo a d in g . T h e re are so m e co m p lex fe a tu re s th a t m a k e th a e a p p lic a tio n o f fra ctu re m e c h a n ic s d iffic u lt su c h as re s id u a l stresses, in te ra c tio n o f c ra c k s w ith w e ld g eo m etry , m a te ria l p ro p e rtie s v a ria tio n s d u e to

d is s im ila r w e ld a n d b a s e m e ta ls a n d e s p e c ia lly m ic ro s tru c tu ra l h e te ro g e n e itie s o f w e ld jo in t re g io n re s u ltin g fro m th e w e ld in g th e rm a l cy c le s.

T e n s ile w e ld in g re sid u a l stre s se s a p p e a ra n c e a n d lo c al m a te ria l e m b rittle m e n t are fu n d a m e n ta l fo r v a rio u s c ra c k in g p h e n o m e n a o f

w e ld s [1], In te ra c tio n o f stre s se s d u rin g stru c tu re o p e ra tio n a n d e x is tin g cra ck s o fte n le ad s to u n e x p e c te d w e ld jo in t fra ctu re. A c tu a lly , cra ck s o rig in a tin g fro m sh a rp w e ld d e fe c ts g ro w d u rin g se rv ic e life o f w e ld e d stru ctu re s. T h e y h a v e to re m a in s m a lle r th a n th e c ritic a l c ra c k size, o th e rw is e , th e y w ill c a u se w e ld jo in t fra c tu re in b rittle o r q u a s i-b rittle m a n n er. D is in te g ra tio n o f a w e ld e d stru c tu re is v e ry lik e ly i f h ig h ly lo a d ed w e ld jo in t c o lla p s e s. A s u p e rio r re s is ta n c e o f w e ld jo in t a g a in s t th e fa tig u e c ra c k g ro w th is o f g re a t im p o rta n c e fo r lo n g e r s e rv ic e liv e s o f w e ld e d stru c tu re s.

T h e re s is ta n c e o f m e ta llic m a te ria ls to fa tig u e c ra c k g ro w th a n d b rittle fra c tu re d ep e n d s o n th e m ic ro stru c tu re . P ro p e rtie s o f th e b a s e m e ta l (B M ) m e e t re q u ire m e n ts in sta n d a rd s. T h e w e a k e s t lin k s are a lw a y s w e ld jo in ts c o n s is tin g o f h e a t-a ffe c te d z o n e (H A Z ) an d w e ld m e tal (W M ). M ic ro s tru c tu re o f b o th in a s -w e ld e d c o n d itio n

Corr. Author's Address: Institute "GOŠA", Belgrade, Serbia, [email protected]

(2)

re su lts fro m ch e m ic a l c o m p o sitio n a n d w e ld in g

th e rm al cycles.

M ic ro s tru c tu re a n d p ro p e rtie s o f w e ld jo in t re g io n can b e a n a ly se d in d e ta ils b y u sin g sa m p le s o f m a teria ls c u t fro m actu al w e ld jo in ts [2], A lte rn a tiv e is an an a ly sis p e rfo rm e d w ith sa m p le s o f m a teria ls w ith sim u la te d m ic ro stru ctu re. In th is ca se , th e rm al c o n d itio n s d u rin g w e ld in g h a v e to b e s im u la te d e ith e r on sa m p le s o f B M in o rd e r to p re p a re p a rtic u la r H A Z a re a s [3] o r o n sa m p le s o f sin g le -ru n W M in o rd e r to p re p a re p a rtic u la r m u lti-ru n W M are as [4], U s in g c o m b in a tio n o f b o th , i.e. sam ples from w eld jo in t and sam ples w ith sim ulated m icrostructure is an effective approach, too [5],

T h e ex p e rim e n ta l re su lts o f fra ctu re to u g h n e ss m e a su re m e n t a n d fa tig u e -c ra c k g ro w th rate m e a su re m e n t are sh o w n a n d d isc u sse d in th is p a p e r fro m th e le a k -b e fo re -b re a k c o n c e p t p o in t o f v iew . F ra c tu re p ro p e rtie s o f w e ld jo in t re g io n a n d n o n -a ffe c te d b a s e m e ta l w e re d e te rm in e d u sin g th e sp e c im e n s m a c h in e d fro m th e sa m p le s o f m a teria l cu t fro m a rea l w e ld e d plate.

1 E X P E R IM E N T A L S

1.1. Materials and Specimens

T h e steel u se d in th is study is A -3 8 7 G r. 11 C lass 1 ste e l d e s ig n e d fo r o p e ra tio n at e le v a te d te m p e ra tu re s. Its ch e m ic al co m p o sitio n an d b asic m ech a n ica l p ro p ertie s a t ro o m te m p eratu re are

sh o w n in T ab le 1 [6]. A 96 m m th ic k d o u b le -U

sh a p ed w e ld e d te st c o u p o n w a s a v a ila b le fo r the re se a rc h . R o o t p asses w ere d e p o site d by m etal m a n u a l arc w e ld in g (M M A ) w ith c o a te d ele c tro d e L IN C O L N Sl 19G (A W S : E 8 0 1 8 -B 2 ), th e re st o f th e w e ld -g ro o v e w a s fille d a t b o th sid e s by su b m e rg e d arc w e ld in g (S A W ) w ith w ire L IN C O L N L N S 150 a n d flu x L IN C O L N P 230. C h e m ic al c o m p o sitio n s o f b o th co n su m ab les are sh o w n in T ab le 2. B a sic m e ch a n ica l p ro p ertie s for all-w e ld m e tals a t ro o m te m p e ra tu re are sh o w n in T ab le 3 [6]. T h e W M is s tro n g e r th a n B M (o v e rm a tc h in g ).

W e ld in g te ch n o lo g y sp e cific atio n w as p rep a re d a c co rd in g to sta n d ard E N 2 8 8-3 [7], O p e ra tin g te m p eratu re is n o t sp e cifie d in this standard. It is n o t req u ired to test th e b e h a v io u r o f th e w eld jo in ts at th e o p era tin g tem p eratu re.

W e ld jo in t w ith sh a rp in itial w e ld d efe cts in th e W M a n d H A Z a re a s w a s e v a lu a te d in re s p e c t o f th e stru c tu re s a fe o p e ra tio n . T he sp e c im e n s f o r th e fra c tu re to u g h n e s s a s se ss m e n t a n d fa tig u e c ra c k g ro w th ra te m e a s u re m e n t w ere m a c h in e d fro m th e w e ld e d te st c o u p o n as sh o w n in F ig u re 1.

T h re e -p o in t b e n d s p e c im e n s (T P B ) w ere u s e d fo r fra c tu re to u g h n e ss te s tin g at ro o m te m p e ra tu re . T h e ir sh a p e an d d im e n sio n s are s h o w n in F ig u re 2. D u e to sp e c ific d e s ig n o f th e h ig h -te m p e ra tu re c h a m b e r, th e s p e c im e n s lo o k ed lik e c o m p a c t te n s ile sp e c im e n s (C T ) u s e d for fra c tu re to u g h n e s s te s tin g a t o p era tin g te m p e ra tu re . T h e ir sh a p e a n d d im e n sio n s are also s h o w n in F ig u re 2.

T a b le L Chemical composition and basic mechanical properties o f the steel

c

Si M n P S C r M o Y ie ld

stress

T e n sile

stren g th E lo n g a tio n

Im p ac t en e rg y

M a ss. °/ M P a %

j

0.15 0 .2 9 0.5 4 0 .0 2 2 0.011 0.93 0 .4 7 325 4 95 35

165

T ab le 2. Chemical composition o f fille r metals

F ille r m e ta l C Si M n P S C r M o

M a ss %

L IN C O L N Sl 19G 0 .08 0 .0 4 5 0.35 0 .0 2 5 0.0 2 5 1.10 0 .5 0 L IN C O L N L N S 150 0.11 0.18 0 .37 0 .0 2 0 0 .0 2 0 1.04 0 .47

T ab le 3. Mechanical properties o f all-weld metals

F ille r m e tal Y ie ld stress T e n sile stren g th E lo n g a tio n Im p a c t e n e rg y

M P a % J

L IN C O L N Sl 19G 505 6 40 23 > 9 5

(3)

B e n d in g s p e c im e n s (B ) w e re u se d fo r fa tig u e -c ra c k g ro w th -ra te m e a su re m e n t. T h e ir d im e n sio n s w e re 1 0 x 1 0 x 5 5 m m . T h e ty p e o f all sp e cim en s, th e ir p o sitio n , a n d o rie n ta tio n in th e te st c o u p o n in re la tio n to th e w e ld ax is is c le a rly in d ic a te d in F ig u re 1. T h e n o tc h e s a n d cra ck s w ere lo c a te d in th e B M , W M an d H A Z.

F ig. 1. View o f the welded test coupon with specimens sampling

T h e v a lu e s o f J -in te g ra l w e re c a lc u la te d from re g is te re d d e p e n d e n c e o f fo rc e v e rs u s lo ad - p o in t d is p la c e m e n t ju s t w h e n u n lo a d in g se q u en c e started . T h e d ia g ra m s J - A a w e re p lo tte d u sin g th o se v a lu e s a n d c o rre s p o n d in g c ra c k in c re m en ts. A t first, a re g re s s io n lin e w a s d ra w n in th e lin e a r se ctio n o f e a c h J - A a d ia g ra m . Jic-v alu e , c ritic a l J-in te g ra l, w a s o b ta in e d w ith in te rs e c tin g J - Aa d ia g ra m a n d a p a ra lle l lin e to re g re s s io n line. T h is line in te rse c ts x -a x is at Aa = 0 .15 m m . T h e

d ia g ra m s J - A a a t ro o m a n d o p e ra tin g te m p e ra tu re v a lid f o r th e B M a re s h o w n in F ig s. 3b and 4 b , th e d ia g ra m s v a lid fo r th e W M in F igs. 5b an d 6b, w h e re a s th e d ia g ra m s v a lid fo r th e F1AZ in F ig s. 7b a n d 8b. A v e ra g e v a lu e s o f

d e te rm in e d J lc-v a lu e s e x tra c te d fro m th o se d ia g ra m s are lis te d in T a b le 4 [10].

2 R E S U L T S

2.1. Fracture toughness

F ra c tu re to u g h n e s s w a s e x p e rim e n ta lly

d e te rm in e d a c c o rd in g to th e sta n d a rd s [8] a n d [9]. S in g le -s p e c im e n m e th o d w a s u sed . T h re e s p e c im e n s w e re n o tc h e d a n d p re c ra c k e d in th e B M , th re e in th e W M an d th re e in th e H A Z . T h e s p e c im e n s w e re lo a d e d a n d s u c c e s s iv e ly p a rtly u n lo a d ed at ro o m te m p e ra tu re an d at 5 4 0 °C . T h e re g is te re d slo p e b e tw e e n fo rc e, F, a n d cra ck m o u th o p e n in g d isp la c e m e n t, 8 (C M O D ), in th e c o u rs e o f s p e c im e n u n lo a d in g e n a b le d d e te rm in a tio n o f th e c ra c k siz e , a, an d e v e ry c ra c k in c re m e n t, A a, re sp e c tiv e ly . T h e e x a m p le s o f d ia g ra m s F - 8 p lo tte d a t ro o m a n d o p e ra tin g te m p e ra tu re v a lid fo r th e B M a re s h o w n in F igs. 3 a a n d 4 a, d ia g ra m s v a lid fo r th e W M in F ig s. 5a a n d 6a, w h e re a s d ia g ra m s v a lid fo r th e H A Z in F ig s. 7 a a n d 8a.

T h e v a lu e s o f J -in te g ra l w e re c a lc u la te d fro m re g is te re d d e p e n d e n c e o f fo rc e v e rs u s lo a d - p o in t d is p la c e m e n t ju s t w h e n u n lo a d in g se q u e n c e sta rte d . T h e d ia g ra m s J - A a w e re p lo tte d u sin g th o se v a lu e s a n d c o rre s p o n d in g c ra c k in c re m en ts. A t first, a re g re s s io n lin e w a s d ra w n in th e lin e a r s e c tio n o f ea c h J - A a d ia g ra m . Jjc-v alu e , c ritica l J -in te g ra l, w a s o b ta in e d w ith in te rse c tin g J - Aa d ia g ra m a n d a p a ra lle l lin e to re g re s s io n line. T h is

lin e in te rse c ts x -a x is a t Aa = 0.1 5 m m . T h e d ia g ra m s J - Aa at ro o m an d o p e ra tin g te m p e ra tu re v a lid fo r th e B M are s h o w n in F igs. 3 b a n d 4 b , th e d ia g ra m s v a lid fo r th e W M in F ig s. 5b a n d 6 b , w h e re a s th e d ia g ra m s v a lid fo r the H A Z in F igs. 7b a n d 8b.

(4)

A v e ra g e v a lu e s o f d e te rm in e d J lc-v a lu e s e x tra c te d

fro m th o s e d ia g ra m s are lis te d in T a b le 4 [10]. In re s p e c t o f fra c tu re to u g h n e ss th e h ig h e s t

q u a lity a re a o f tre a te d w e ld jo in t is W M w h e re a s th e lo w e s t H A Z . T e s tin g te m p e ra tu re d o e s n o t c h a n g e th is fact.

T a b le 4. Fracture toughness, JIc, plane-strain fracture toughness, KIc, threshold stress-intensity range and parameters o f fatigue crack growth rate C and m

A re a H O o J Ic, k J /m 2 K lc, M P a m '/2 A K th, M P a m '/2 C , n m /c y c le m

B M 63.5 120.9 6.8 4 ■ 1 ( f 3 2.1

W M 20 81.3 133.7 6.8 8 - 10'4 2.8

H A Z 51 .7 106.6 6.7 2 ■ i cr4 3,5

B M 4 3 .4 88 .4 5.9 1 ■10'3 3.0

W M 540 57 .2 101.6 6.2 5 ■10'4 3.5

H A Z 38 ,9 83.7 6.1 3 • i cr4 3.9

a) b )

F ig . 3. Diagrams F - ö and J- A a fo r the B M a t room temperature

a) b )

(5)

F

,

k

N

F

,

k

N

a) b)

F ig . 5. Diagrams F - S and J - A a fo r the W M at room temperature

a b

F ig . 6. Diagrams F - S (a) and J - Aa (b) fo r the W M at operating temperature

a b

(6)

F ig. 8. Diagrams F - ö (a) and J - / l a (b) fo r the H A Z at operating temperature

2.2. Fatigue-crack growth-rate parameters

F a tig u e -c ra c k g ro w th -ra te p a ra m e te rs w ere e x p e rim e n ta lly d e te rm in e d a c c o rd in g to th e sta n d a rd A S T M E 6 47 [11], C h a rp y -siz e sp e c im e n s w e re n o tc h e d to a d e p th o f 2 m m in th e W M an d H A Z a re a s an d in th e B M . T h e y w e re b e n d -lo a d e d in m o m e n t co n tro l at ro o m te m p e ra tu re an d at 5 4 0 °C o n a h ig h -fre q u e n c y re so n a n t p u lsa to r. R e sista n t fo il-g a u g e s w ere a tta c h e d on th e sp e cim en s in o rd e r to re g iste r c ra c k siz e ch a n g e s d u rin g o sc illa tin g lo a d in g (see F ig u re 9). In th e c o u rse o f su c c e ssiv e sm a ll c ra c k in c re m en ts, th e s tre s s-in te n sity fa c to r ra n g e , AK, w a s k e p t c o n stan t. S im u lta n e o u s c o rre c tio n s o f lo a d in g m o m e n t w e re p e rfo rm e d d u rin g fatig u e c ra c k g ro w th . F a tig u e c ra c k g ro w th ra te , d a /d N , w a s c a lc u la te d as a q u o tie n t o f c ra c k in c re m en t,

Aa, a n d n u m b e r o f c y c le s, N .

F ig . 9. Specimen with firm ly cem ented crack size gauge with indicated bend-loading

T h e fa tig u e c ra c k g ro w th ra te ra p id ly d ec reased w h e n A K w h e n a p p ro a c h in g th e th re s h o ld stress-

in te n sity fa c to r ra n g e , A K th. O n th e o th e r side, w h e n A K c a m e u p to K c-v a lu e fa tig u e c ra c k grew faster.

E x p e rim e n ta l d ia g ra m s d a /d N - AK re p re s e n te d in d o u b le -lo g a rith m ic sc a le at ro o m te m p e ra tu re v a lid fo r th e B M , W M , a n d H A Z are s h o w n in F ig u re 10a a n d th o se at o p era tin g te m p e ra tu re in F ig u re 10b.

T h e lin e a r p o rtio n o f re la tio n s h ip b etw e en th e fa tig u e c ra c k g ro w th ra te a n d stre s s-in te n sity fa c to r ra n g e is k n o w n as P a ris la w [12]:

s = c '<i K >- < "

w h e re c o n s ta n ts C a n d m are m a te ria l-d e p e n d e n t. F a tig u e -c ra c k g ro w th -ra te p a ra m ete rs e x tra c te d fro m d ia g ra m s a re lis te d in T ab le 4

[13].

3 E V A L U A T IO N O F T E S T R E S U L T S

I f m e c h a n ic a l p ro p e rtie s a re av ailab le, p la n e -s tra in fra c tu re to u g h n e s s , K ic, is in d ire ctly d e te rm in e d fro m th e Jic-v a lu e s. T h e fo llo w in g e x p re s s io n is u sed :

(2)

w h e re E is Y o u n g ’s m o d u lu s a n d y P o is s o n ’s n u m b e r.

E s tim a te d v a lu e o f E at te m p e ra tu re o f 5 4 0 °C is 8 2 % o f th e sa m e v a lu e a t room

(7)

ro o m te m p e ra tu re a n d 5 4 0 °C fo r th e c a lc u la tio n o f Kic-'values g iv e n in T a b le 4.

V a ria tio n s o f K lc in th e w e ld jo in t re g io n in c o m p a riso n w ith B M are e x tre m e ly sig n ific a n t. C ritica l c ra c k size, a c, w h e n w e ld jo in t fra c tu re s at a fix ed stress lev el is s tro n g ly K lc d e p e n d e n t. By a p p ly in g fo rm u la

K lc = ö - Y ( a ) A/7 t- a c (3)

C ritic a l c ra c k siz e is c a lc u la te d as

( v \2 a , = -1

71 K k

a ■ Y (a) (4)

w h ere Y (a) is sh a p e fa c to r an d a stress n o rm a l to the c ra c k p la n e.

W h en fa tig u e c ra c k g ro w s in a c c o rd a n c e w ith P aris la w , stre s s -in te n s ity fa c to r ra n g e is g re a te r th an th e th re sh o ld s tre s s-in te n sity fa c to r ra n g e ,

AK*-I f th e fa tig u e c ra c k g ro w th rate p a ra m e te rs C an d m are a v a ila b le , th e n u m b e r o f c y c le s to fra ctu re, N , w ill b e d e te rm in e d u sin g E q u a tio n 1. T he fo llo w in g e x p re ssio n h a s to b e so lv ed :

af j m N

}--- 5 _ = C - „ 7 . ( a ) - . J d N (5)

Y ( a ) - a 2 0

w h e re a s an d a f are in itial a n d fin al c ra c k size, re sp e c tiv e ly .

S h a p e fa c to r o f an in fin ite 9 6 -m m th ic k w all w ith d iffe re n t ty p e s a n d siz es o f c ra c k s are

[15]:

> S m all h a lf-e llip tic su rfa c e c ra c k w ith len g th - to -d e p th ra tio 2 .4 2 (F ig u re 1 la ): Y = 0 .7 3 4 > H a lf-e llip tic su rfa c e cra ck w ith le n g th -to -d e p th

ratio 2 .83 p e n e tra tin g h a l f o f th e w a ll-th ic k n e s s (F ig u re l i b ) : Y = 0 .8 6

> H a lf-e llip tic su rfa c e c ra c k w ith le n g th -to -d e p th ra tio 4 .2 a p p ro a c h in g o p p o s ite w all su rfa c e (F ig u re 11c): Y = 1.234

> T h ro u g h -th ic k n e s s c ra c k (F ig u re 1 Id ): Y = l .

4 D IS C U S S IO N W IT H C O N C L U S IO N

I f d u rin g c y c lic lo a d in g an e x is tin g cra ck , p re v io u s ly g e n e ra te d fro m a sh a rp w e ld d e fe c t, h a d g ro w n to th e siz e w h e n a n y w h e re a lo n g th e c ra c k c o n to u r s tre s s -in te n s ity fa c to r a tta in s p la n e stra in fra c tu re to u g h n e s s , K |C-v a lu e , an a b ru p t fra c tu re o f w e ld jo in t w o u ld o c c u r. T h is siz e is d e fin e d as th e c ritic a l c ra c k siz e. I f siz e o f fa tig u e c ra c k a tta in s th e c ritic a l c ra c k siz e , w e ld jo in t w ill fra c tu re . T h e re s u lt ca n b e a c a ta stro p h ic d is in te g ra tio n o f th e w h o le stru ctu re .

AK, M Pa m l/2

a)

AK, M Pa m ',!

(8)

®r

2ci 2ac

1«--- ►

!

i

i

——

---—►

:

2c,

:

i

ar t

'

1

1

* d

1

2c,

—- = 4.20

ai

Fig. 11. Four types o f fatigue cracks: sm all initial half-elliptic surface crack a-, (a), fin a l half-elliptic surface crack af (h), wall-penetrating crack when leakage starts a, (c), critical and non-critical

through-thickness cracks ac,C / (d)

A ssu m e th a t in itial in n e r su rfa c e c ra c k in th e w e ld jo in t a re a is a lre a d y a lo n g crack . F o r th e lin e a r-e la stic tre a tm e n t, th e d e p th o f th is cra ck , ao, h a s to b e m u c h g re a te r th a n th e p la s tic z o n e size, ry (F ig u re 11a).

a ; > 5 0 r y (6)

P la stic z o n e a h e a d o f th e c ra c k tip d e v e lo p s as th e re su lt o f in te ra c tio n b e tw e e n a c ra c k a n d stress. Its siz e d e p e n d s o n th e stress- in te n sity fac to r, K , m a te ria l y ie ld stress, R p, a n d stre s s-fie ld co n fig u ra tio n .

vRry

—— plane stress condition

. 271

— p lane strain condition

. 671:

(

7

)

O p e ra tin g stre s s o f th e stru c tu re d o e s n o t e x c e e d 100 M P a. In n er s u rfa c e c ra c k 5 m m -d e e p fu lfils th e c o n d itio n in E q u a tio n 6. C ra c k s o f th is siz e w e re fo u n d in th e stru c tu re d u rin g re g u la r in- se rv ic e in sp e c tio n s. T h e re fo re , th o s e c ra c k s g ro w in a c c o rd a n c e w ith P a ris law . P r o o f p re s s u re te st p e rfo rm e d a fte r in -s e rv ic e in sp e c tio n s le d to th e stress 10 0 % h ig h e r th a n m a x im u m o p e ra tin g stress.

It is g re a t a d v a n ta g e to o p e ra te a p re ssu re - p la n t d e s ig n e d b a s e d o n le a k -b e fo re -b re a k . F a tig u e -c ra c k p e n e tra tio n th ro u g h th e w a ll ca n b e m a n ife ste d e ith e r b y lo ss o f p re s s u re o r b y leak a g e. T h a n k s to th o s e o b v io u s in d ic a tio n s , an o p e ra to r is c a p a b le to p re v e n t fin a l fra c tu re o f th e p la n t b y s h u ttin g it d o w n . A b ru p t fra c tu re o f

p re s s u riz e d c o m p o n e n t c o u ld b e je o p a r d iz in g for h u m a n liv e s a n d en v iro n m e n t. B e sid e s, a p la n t d e s ig n e d in a c c o rd a n c e w ith le a k -b e fo re -b re a k c o n c e p t a llo w s p e rio d ic a l re p a irs o r re p la c e m e n t o f th e d a m a g e d c o m p o n e n t.

T h e p ro c e d u re is as fo llo w s:

1) C a lc u la tio n o f th e th ro u g h -th ic k n e s s c ra c k size w h ic h re su lts in fra c tu re , a c'hroush (su b s c rip t c d e n o te s c ritic a l siz e fo r fra ctu re).

2 ) C a lc u la tio n o f th e d e p th o f s u rfa c e c ra c k in an in fin ite th ic k w a ll w h ic h re su lts in fracture,

^surface 9 6 - m m t h i c k W a l l

3) C o m p a ris o n o f th e a csurface w ith th e w all th ic k n e s s t. I f a csurface < t, c ra c k w ill not p e n e tra te th e w a ll in a sta b le m a n n e r befo re fra ctu re.

4 ) I f acsmface > t, th e c ra c k w ill p e n e tra te th e w all. D e p th o f c ra c k a p p ro a c h in g th e o p p o site su rfa c e o f th e w a ll, a,, is t, w h e re a s its length 2cj = 4 .2 x a i (s u b s c rip t 1 d e n o te s th e siz e for le a k a g e to start).

5) T h e c ra c k p e n e tra tin g th e w a ll g ro w s fu rth e r a n d b e c o m e s a th ro u g h -th ic k n e s s c ra c k o f le n g th 2 a = 2 Clsurface.

6 ) I f th e c ritic a l c ra c k siz e a cthrough » c csurface, th e re is e n o u g h tim e to n o tic e p re s s u re lo ss or leakage.

(9)

w o u ld c e rta in ly p e n e tra te th e w a ll b e fo re fin al fractu re.

W h e n c ra c k w o u ld ap p ro a c h th e o p p o site w all su rfa c e , its h a lf-le n g th o n th e in n e r su rfa c e w o u ld b e Ci = 2 0 2 m m . T h is is n o t m u c h less th an critical th ro u g h -th ic k n e s s c ra c k siz e u n d e r n o rm al o p e ra tin g c o n d itio n in th e B M (2 4 9 m m ) and es p e c ia lly in th e H A Z (223 m m ). W ith o u t an y d o u b t, w e ld jo in t p ro p e rtie s o f th is p la n t sa tisfy th e le a k -b e fo re -b re a k co n c e p t, b u t its o p e ra tin g safety fa c to r is a b it q u e s tio n a b le .

C a lc u la te d c ritica l siz e s o f th e th ro u g h ­ th ic k n ess c ra c k in p ro o f-te s t c o n d itio n are listed in T a b le 5. T h e y are m u c h sm a lle r th a n th e h alf- len g th o f th e c ra c k p e n e tra tin g th e w all. T h e p o ssib ility th a t th e e x is tin g d ee p c ra c k c a n n o t be d e te c te d d u rin g in -se rv ic e in sp e c tio n a fte r w h ich p ro o f-te st s h o u ld b e p e rfo rm e d m a y n o t b e n e g lec ted . C ra c k siz e acthrough in p ro o f-te s t co n d itio n c o u ld b e c ru c ia l fo r fu rth e r safe o p era tio n o f th e p la n t.

F o r h ig h e r re lia b ility , it is b e n e fic ia l to lim it m a x im u m a llo w a b le c ra c k siz e rig o ro u s ly , for in sta n c e , le t th e c ra c k siz e b e o n ly o n e - h a lf o f the w a ll-th ic k n e s s . S tre s s -in te n s ity fa c to r w h ic h is the re s u lt o f th is c ra c k at p r o o f stre s s is K = 67

M P a. T h is lev el o f s tre s s-in te n sity is lo w e r th an th e p la n e -s tra in fra c tu re to u g h n e s s o f B M , W M , an d e v e n H A Z . I f d u rin g in -s e rv ic e in sp e c tio n s a ca refu l e ffo rt w e re m a d e to fin d all c ra c k s on in n e r su rfa c e , sa fe o p e ra tio n o f p la n t w o u ld be g u a ra n te e d .

W h ic h c ra c k s are m o re d a n g e ro u s in th e w e ld jo in t re g io n - lo n g itu d in a l c ra c k s in th e H A Z o r tra n sv e rsa l c ra c k s in th e W M ? T h e se c ra c k s are o fte n th e re s u lt o f h y d ro g e n a tta c k o n h a rd a re a s o f w e ld jo in ts .

In te rm s o f e x p e rim e n ta l d a ta lis te d in T a b le 4 , th e c ra c k s in the H A Z w ill g ro w fa ste r th a n th e c ra c k s in th e W M . In itial c ra c k s in th e H A Z c o u ld g ro w all th e tim e th ro u g h th e m a te ria l w ith th e w o rs t p ro p e rtie s. In itial c ra c k s in th e W M g ro w at first in th e W M , th e n g o a c ro ss H A Z , an d c o n tin u e o u ts id e th e w e ld jo in t in th e B M w h ic h p ro p e rtie s are su p e rio r. C o m p a ris o n o f th e n u m b e r o f c y c le s fo r a n in itial 5 m m -d e e p c ra c k to g ro w to 5 0 % o f th e fin a l c ra c k siz e (a = 2 4 m m ) at ro o m an d o p e ra tin g te m p e ra tu re s is s h o w n in T a b le 6. T h e b a s is is n e c e s s a ry n u m b e r o f c y c le s fo r c ra c k g ro w th in th e H A Z at o p e ra tin g te m p e ra tu re .

T ab le 5. Critical sizes o f part-thickness and through-thickness cracks in normal operating and p r o o f test conditions

A re a H o n

surface

a c Cl a cthrough “ cthrough

o p e ra tin g c o n d itio n p ro o f-te s t c o n d itio n

m m m m

B M

20

864 2 02 4 65 116

W M 1056 2 02 5 69 142

H A Z 671 2 0 2 3 62 90

B M

5 40

4 6 2 2 0 2 2 4 9 62

W M 6 10 2 0 2 3 29 82

H A Z 4 1 4 2 0 2 223 56

T ab le 6. Time n eededfor the crack growth to h a lf o f the fin a l crack size at operating temperature in relation to the time fo r growth in the weakest area o f the w eldjoint region, i.e. H AZ

A re a T, °C N /N o

o p e ra tin g c o n d itio n

B M 51.8

W M 20 8.8

H A Z 4.5

B M 3.8

W M 5 40 1.8

(10)

Q u o tie n ts N /N 0 listed in T a b le 6 are a d d itio n a l sa fe ty fa c to rs fo r th e sa fe s tru c tu re o p era tio n . T h e m o st d a n g e ro u s s itu a tio n is th e p re se n c e o f lo n g itu d in a l c ra c k s in th e H A Z , w h ic h g ro w th ro u g h th e H A Z u n d e r c y c lic lo a d in g at te m p e ra tu re o f 5 4 0 °C .

5 R E F E R E N C E S

[1] Z. B u rzić, S. S ed m a k , M . M a n jg o (2 0 0 1 ) T h e a p p lic a tio n o f fra c tu re m e c h a n ic s in w e ld e d jo in t p ro p e rtie s a s se ss m e n t, R IM 2 0 0 1 , B ih ać , pp. 4 5 1 -4 6 0 .

[2] N . G u b e lja k (1 9 9 9 ) F ra c tu re b e h a v io r o f sp e c im e n s w ith su rfa c e n o tc h tip in th e h ea t a ffe c te d z o n e (H A Z ) o f s tre n g th m is­ m a tc h e d w e ld e d jo in ts , In te rn a tio n a l jo u rn a l o f f r a c tu r e , 100 (2) pp. 155-167

[3] V . G lih a (2 0 0 5 ) T h e m ic ro stru c tu re a n d p ro p e rtie s o f m a te ria ls at th e fu sio n line, [12] M e ta llu rg y , 4 4 (1 ), pp. 13-18.

[4] D . R o jk o , V . G lih a (2 0 0 5 ) S im u la tio n s o f tra n s fo rm a tio n k in e tic s in a m u lti-p a s s w eld , M a te ria ls a n d m a n u fa c tu rin g p ro c e s s e s , 2 0 [13] (5 ), pp. 8 3 3 -8 4 9 .

[5] I. R a k , V . G lih a , M . K o ? a k (1 9 9 7 ) W e ld a b ility an d to u g h n e ss a s s e s s m e n t o f T i- m ic ro a llo y e d o ffsh o re steel. M e ta llu rg ic a l a n d m a te ria ls tra n sa c tio n s A , 2 8 , pp. 199- 2 06.

[6] M . B u rz ić , Z. B u rz ić , J. K u ra i (2 0 0 6 ) T h e p re d ic tio n o f re s id u a l life o f re a c to rs in R N P , C e rtL a b P a n č e v o .

[7] E N 2 8 8 -3 , (1 9 9 5 ) A p p ro v a l o f w e ld in g p ro c e d u re s fo r m e ta llic m a te ria ls -P a rt 3:

W e ld in g p ro c e d u re te sts fo r a rc w e ld in g o f ste e ls, Q u a lity a s s u ra n c e in w eld in g , B e lg ra d e .

[8] A S T M E l 152-91 (1 9 9 5 ) S ta n d a rd T est M e th o d fo r D e te rm in in g J - R C u rv e , A n n u al B o o k o f A S T M S ta n d a rd s, V o i. 0 4 .0 1 . pp. 724.

[9] B S 74 4 8 (1 9 9 1 ) F ra c tu re m e c h a n ic s to u g h n e s s te sts. P a rt 1. M e th o d for d e te rm in a tio n o f K ic c ritic a l C T O D an d c ritic a l J v a lu e s o f m e ta llic m a te ria ls , B S I. [10] M . B u rz ić (2 0 0 7 ) P h D T h e sis, U n iv e rs ity o f

N o v i S ad, D e p a rtm e n t o f T e c h n ic a l F acu lty , S erb ia.

[11] A S T M E 6 4 7 (1 9 9 5 ) S ta n d a rd T e s t M e th o d fo r C o n s ta n t-L o a d -A m p litu d e F a tig u e C rack G ro w th R a te s A b o v e 10'8 m /c y c le , A n n u al B o o k o f A S T M S ta n d a rd s V o i. 03. 0 1 , pp. 7 14.

P .C . P a ris, a n d F. E rd o g a n (1 9 8 2 ) A C ritical A n a ly s is o f C ra c k P ro p a g a tio n L aw s, T rans. A S M E , Jo u rn a l B a s ic E n g ., V o i. 85, N o. 4, p p . 528.

M . B u rz ić , Z. B u rz ić , J. K u ra i, D ž. G ačo (2 0 0 7 ) F a tig u e B e h a v io u r o f A llo y e d Steel fo r H ig h T e m p e ra tu re , F irs t S e rb ia n (2 6 th Y U ) C o n g re s s o n T h e o re tic a l a n d A p p lie d M e c h a n ic s , K o p a o n ik , S erb ia, p p . 1085-

1090.

[14] D IN 4 1 3 3 (1 9 9 1 ) S c h o rn s te in e a u s Stahl, B e rlin .

Figure

Table L Chemical composition and basic mechanical properties o f the steel
Fig. 1. View o f the welded test coupon
Table 4. Fracture toughness, JIc, plane-strain fracture toughness, KIc, threshold stress-intensity range and parameters o f fatigue crack growth rate C and m
Fig. 5. Diagrams F - S  and J - A a  fo r the WMat room temperature
+5

References

Related documents

The company organization is structured in such a way that top down corporate objectives and bottom up performance results are passed through the various business units, orbits

CIS will seek to standardize local, regional and state level boards and fields to share out as state positions (IMTs, EMTF, DDC, HSR, DC, SC) are centralized onto the LoneStar

Conventional turning (CT) of such hard alloys causes high cutting forces imposed by a tool on a work-piece, ultimately leading to high stresses, strains and temperatures in the

As a result, although the liquidity provision component is positive on average, it is much smaller and not significant, perhaps because of the possibility of trading against

The effect of mustard green extract at dose 0.5 mg/kg body weight on lowering blood glucose based on the mean difference is lower significantly compared to the normal

There is, therefore, every rea- son to predict that girls also show greater differences than boys in their use of any linguistic variable that is associated with social

SINGH & BANERJEE: VALUE ADDITION TO SOYBEAN WHEY 10 Fung W Y & Liong M T, Evaluation of proteolytic and ACE–inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus in soy whey growth

Note that Void shields or Power fields have no effect in close combat, all damage is worked out directly against the Titan itself..