Standard #4 Measurement and Analysis of Student Learning and Performance a. Program Outcomes for Supply Chain Management
List outcomes, by accredited program. Many of the program outcomes should be used as part of a student learning assessment plan and be measurable.
Graduates of this major will be able to... P r o g r a m
Outcome #1
…demonstrate a working knowledge of the tools and terminology associated with manufacturing and service organizations.
P r o g r a m Outcome #2
…demonstrate a working knowledge of distribution and logistics concepts, tools, and management practices.
P r o g r a m Outcome #3
…demonstrate a working knowledge of project management terminology and management techniques.
P r o g r a m Outcome #4
…demonstrate a working knowledge of quality management terminology, practices, and tools.
P r o g r a m Outcome #5
…demonstrate a working knowledge of purchasing and supplier relationship management terminology and practices.
Performance Results
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)
Performance Indicator Definition
1. Student Learning Results for program outcome #1 (SCM 388)
Demonstrated working knowledge of the tools and terminology associated with manufacturing and service organizations.
Define Measure Analyze Results Improve Control Performance and Measurement Defined Demonstrated working knowledge of the tools and terminology associated with manufacturing and service organizations as measured by a class average of >70% or better on exams What is your measurement instrument or process? Formative Internal Assessment was used. Midterm and Final examinations were used to assess student learning results. Evaluation is based on 2012-2013 academic year (Fall and Winter/Spring Results The following results were obtained. SCM 388 Fall 2012 overall average was 80%. SCM 388 Spring 2013 overall average was 74%. Analysis of Results Results of assessment indicate that the performance objective of >70% was met. While the fall 2012 results were higher than the spring 2013 results no significant changes were made to course. Statistically there was no difference Action Taken or Improvement made No significant changes were made during 2012-2013. Performance objective established was met. Improvement opportunities for 2013-2014 include the addition of more experiential based learning initiatives
semesters. between the performance indicators for the fall and spring semester (t=1.23; p<.22).
emphasizing key concepts.
Performance Results
Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)
Performance Indicator Definition
2. Student Learning Results for program outcome #2 (SCM 485) Define Measure
Demonstrated working knowledge of distribution and logistics concepts, tools, and management practices.
Analyze Improve Control Results Performance and Measurement Defined Demonstrated working knowledge of distribution and logistics concepts, tools, and management practices with a class average of >70% on exams What is your measurement instrument or process? Formative Internal Assessment was used. Midterm and Final examinations were used to assess student learning results. Evaluation is based on 2012-2013 academic year. Current Results The following results were obtained. SCM 485 Spring 2013 overall average was 87% for the Baseline. Analyze Results Results of assessment indicate that the performance objective of >70% was met. Action Taken or Improvement made No significant changes were made during 2012-2013. Performance objective established was met. Improvement opportunities for 2013-2014 include the addition of more experiential based learning initiatives emphasizing key concepts.
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Fall 2012 Spring 2013
SCM 485 Performance
Indicator
485Performance Results
Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)
Performance Indicator Definition
3. Student Learning Results for Program Outcome #3 (SCM 404)
Define Measure
Demonstrated working knowledge of project management terminology and management techniques.
Analyze Improve Control Results
Performance and Measurement Defined Demonstrated working knowledge of project management terminology and management techniques with a class average of >70% on exams What is your measurement instrument or process? Formative Internal Assessment was used. Midterm and Final examinations were used to assess student learning results. Evaluation is based on 2012-2013 academic year. Current Results The following results were obtained. SCM 404 Fall 2012 overall average was 78% for the Baseline. Analysis of Results Results of assessment indicate that the performance objective of >70% was met. Action Taken or Improvement made No significant changes were made during 2012-2013. Performance objective established was met. Improvement opportunities for 2013-2014 include the addition of more experiential based learning initiatives emphasizing key concepts.
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Fall 2012 Spring 2013
SCM 404 Performance
Indicator
404Performance Results
Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)
Performance Indicator Definition
4. Student Learning Results for Program Outcome #4 (SCM 405)
Define Measure
Demonstrated working knowledge of quality management terminology, practices, and tools.
Results Analyze Improve Control Performance and Measurement Defined Demonstrated working knowledge of quality management terminology, practices, and tools with a class average >70% on the Portfolio assignment. What is your measurement instrument or process? Formative internal assessment instrument was used. Portfolios were used to assess student learning results. Evaluation is based on Winter/Spring Semester 2010, 2011, and 2012. Current Results Assessment Results for 2010 was 94 %, 2011 was 95 %, and 2012 was 98 %. Analysis of Results Results of the Portfolio assessment indicated the performance objective of an overall class average >70% was met. Action Taken or Improvement made Improvements for 2013-2014 include a revision of the coursework to include more challenging curriculum. Current course utilizes cases from textbook. Future course will utilize Harvard Business Cases or equivalents. SCM 405 0 20 40 60 80 100 2010-‐11 2011-‐12 2012-‐13
Por6olio Assignment
Series1Performance Results
Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)
Performance Indicator Definition
5. Student Learning Results for program outcome #5 (SCM 481) Define Measure
Demonstrated working knowledge of purchasing and supplier relationship management terminology and practices.
Analyze Improve Control Results Performance Measure Demonstrated working knowledge of purchasing and supplier relationship management terminology and practices with a class average >70% on exams. What is your measurement instrument or process? Formative internal assessment instrument was used. Midterm and Final examinations were used to assess student learning results. Evaluation is based on Fall 2012 which serves as baseline evaluation Current Results Assessment Results for 2012 was 86% for the Baseline. Analysis of Results Results of the assessment indicate that the performance objective of an overall class average >70% was met. Action Taken or Improvement made Improvements for 2013-2014 include a revision of the coursework to include more challenging curriculum. Current course utilizes cases from textbook. Future course will utilize Harvard Business Cases or equivalents. 0 0.5 1 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
