• No results found

VA Software Background

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "VA Software Background"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

VA Software Background

VA Software Background

Publicly held since 1999 (Nasdaq: LNUX)Publicly held since 1999 (Nasdaq: LNUX)

Parent company of OSTGParent company of OSTG

Flagship product: SourceForge Enterprise Flagship product: SourceForge Enterprise Edition

Edition

Customers include Fortune 1000 firms in Customers include Fortune 1000 firms in financial services, communications,

financial services, communications, manufacturing, government & defense manufacturing, government & defense……

SourceForge technology also powers SourceForge technology also powers the efforts of the open

the efforts of the open-source -source community worldwide

community worldwide (SourceForge.net)

(SourceForge.net)

Over 1 Million+ SourceForge users Over 1 Million+ SourceForge users worldwide

(3)

Late 2001 Needs

Late 2001 Needs

..

..

Fremont, CA Chennai, India Ukraine Tokyo, Japan •

Bring new team swiftly up to speedBring new team swiftly up to speed

• Swift ramp upSwift ramp up •

• CoCo--developmentdevelopment •

• New team takes on all 3.x lead developmentNew team takes on all 3.x lead development •

• 3.x moves into sustaining engineering mode when 4.1 is released3.x moves into sustaining engineering mode when 4.1 is released •

• 3.x moves into maintenance mode when 4.2 is released3.x moves into maintenance mode when 4.2 is released •

Continued, efficient collaborative development with teams in Continued, efficient collaborative development with teams in Ukraine and Japan

Ukraine and Japan

Continued development of 3.x Continued development of 3.x product line

product line

Start development of 4.x productStart development of 4.x product

(4)

What We

What We

re

re

Developing

Developing

. &

. &

What We Use

What We Use

(5)

Key Offshore Requirements

Key Offshore Requirements

High quality and timeliness of workHigh quality and timeliness of work

Ease of knowledge transfer and retentionEase of knowledge transfer and retention

High flexibility regarding locale of project executionHigh flexibility regarding locale of project execution

Strong IP protectionStrong IP protection

Accurate & transparent project governance:Accurate & transparent project governance:

• Comprehensive audit trailComprehensive audit trail •

• High visibility and control of programsHigh visibility and control of programs •

Identify and obviate costs that reduce offshore savingsIdentify and obviate costs that reduce offshore savings

• Savings expectations as high as 80%Savings expectations as high as 80% •

(6)

Offshore Team: Build vs. Buy

Offshore Team: Build vs. Buy

BuyBuy

• Swift start up (+)Swift start up (+) •

• Minimal infrastructural complexity (+)Minimal infrastructural complexity (+) •

• Less control (Less control (--)) •

• Higher cost (Higher cost (--)) •

• Less risk, lower commitment (+)Less risk, lower commitment (+) •

• Flexibility to swiftly add staff (+)Flexibility to swiftly add staff (+) •

BuildBuild

• Longer to establish team and infrastructure (Longer to establish team and infrastructure (--)) •

• Greater control and lower cost in the long run (+)Greater control and lower cost in the long run (+)

Hybrid Model

Hybrid Model

Gain experience & prove it works

Establish your own entity, lower cost, increase control

(7)

Document Requirements Candidate Identification

Vendor Selection Trial Project

No cost to VA Software; Exercised both teams

RFP

Included contract term-sheet

Contract

Rate of staff turnover “Shadow Staff”

Price adjusts as team grows ……

Identify & Quantify Needs

Establishing the Relationship

Establishing the Relationship

Decision: buy not build Decision: buy not build

Swift processSwift process

• 12 weeks from go to close12 weeks from go to close •

Formal processFormal process

• Trial projectTrial project •

• RFPRFP •

Informal process –Informal process –

getting to know the team getting to know the team

Trial project was Trial project was veryvery enlightening

enlightening

(8)

Building The Relationship

Building The Relationship

TrainingTraining

• Formal & informalFormal & informal •

• Staff exchangeStaff exchange •

• ““Eat our own dog foodEat our own dog food”” •

ProcessProcess

• Defined within the development environmentDefined within the development environment •

• Lots of examples & guidance; Lots of feedbackLots of examples & guidance; Lots of feedback •

RelationshipRelationship

• Brief Indian team on status of VABrief Indian team on status of VA’’s businesss business •

• Teach Teach ““Push backPush back”” •

(9)

Costs

Costs

Software Engineer: $16 per hour / $30k p.a.Software Engineer: $16 per hour / $30k p.a.

Lead Engineer, Project Manager: $22 per hour / $42k p.a.Lead Engineer, Project Manager: $22 per hour / $42k p.a.

[Beware of 9[Beware of 9-hour workdays!]-hour workdays!]

Fully-Fully-loaded Software Engineer in Silicon Valley: $120k p.a.loaded Software Engineer in Silicon Valley: $120k p.a.

4 India-4 India-based engineers = 1 USbased engineers = 1 US--based engineerbased engineer

Travel to US:Travel to US:

• $1,500 transport per trip$1,500 transport per trip •

• $100 per diem $100 per diem •

Costs included network bandwidth & majority of offCosts included network bandwidth & majority of off-shore located -shore located hardware

(10)

Staffing Levels

Staffing Levels

(11)

Efficiency

Efficiency

New engineers took, on average, 40 working days to achieve full New engineers took, on average, 40 working days to achieve full efficiency

efficiency

Upon allocation, shadow staff were at full efficiency within 2 Upon allocation, shadow staff were at full efficiency within 2 –– 3 days3 days

Efficiency of IndiaEfficiency of India-based staff averaged 80% of that of US-based staff averaged 80% of that of US--based based staff

staff

Mutual efforts drove continuous quality improvementsMutual efforts drove continuous quality improvements

Location of senior resources makes a big difference:Location of senior resources makes a big difference:

• E.g. When designing a major product component, a Product DesigneE.g. When designing a major product component, a Product Designer/Manager was r/Manager was allocated locally in India.

allocated locally in India. •

Effective on-Effective on-shore leadership skills tended to transfer well to offshore leadership skills tended to transfer well to off- -shore staff

(12)

Efficiency

Efficiency

Initial tasks usually bug fixing –Initial tasks usually bug fixing – large, historic dataset made it easy large, historic dataset made it easy to measure efficiency

to measure efficiency

• Fix rate by severity & complexity of issue (function points, Fix rate by severity & complexity of issue (function points, LOCLOC’’ss etc)etc) •

(13)

Technology

Technology

Central, shared collaboration serverCentral, shared collaboration server

• Capture all eCapture all e--mail in discussion forumsmail in discussion forums •

• Document storage, versioning, review/approvalDocument storage, versioning, review/approval •

• Task management synchronized with MS ProjectTask management synchronized with MS Project •

• Source code change managementSource code change management •

• Bug and enhancement prioritization, assignment and trackingBug and enhancement prioritization, assignment and tracking •

Instant MessagingInstant Messaging

Shared whiteboard & desktop for jointShared whiteboard & desktop for joint-development sessions-development sessions

Voice over IP (VOIP)Voice over IP (VOIP)

Primary and backup broadband connectionPrimary and backup broadband connection

(14)

Lessons learned

Lessons learned

(1)(1)

Offshore development can be very cost effectiveOffshore development can be very cost effective

• But not on day 1; Focus on incremental improvementsBut not on day 1; Focus on incremental improvements •

Significantly increased planning and execution flexibilitySignificantly increased planning and execution flexibility

Communication is a key to successCommunication is a key to success

• Archives, change management and audit trails saved our lives!Archives, change management and audit trails saved our lives! •

• Great source of materials for reuse elsewhere in the companyGreat source of materials for reuse elsewhere in the company •

Management time was [initially] greater than we expectedManagement time was [initially] greater than we expected

• OnOn--site project manager from vendor made a big differencesite project manager from vendor made a big difference •

• BUT we removed this role when the relationship was establishedBUT we removed this role when the relationship was established •

(15)

Treat the offshore team as you would treat your own staffTreat the offshore team as you would treat your own staff

Identify risks and establish mitigation plans early in the Identify risks and establish mitigation plans early in the process

process

• Expect and plan for communications downtime: AutonomyExpect and plan for communications downtime: Autonomy •

• Example: Software Change Management system replicationExample: Software Change Management system replication •

Face-Face-time is valuable for relationship building and can be very time is valuable for relationship building and can be very cost effective

cost effective

– Example: Indian staff working in the US are paid at Indian rate Example: Indian staff working in the US are paid at Indian rate

– Incremental cost is travel and per diem Incremental cost is travel and per diem

Ever-Ever-growing knowledge base makes staff regrowing knowledge base makes staff re--assignment & assignment & project

project--locale reassignment easierlocale reassignment easier

Lessons learned

Lessons learned

(2)(2)

(16)

High value in common processes, practices & terminologyHigh value in common processes, practices & terminology

– Established at project start, and accumulated over timeEstablished at project start, and accumulated over time •

Regular process post-Regular process post-mortem and improvementsmortem and improvements

• Demand that offshore partner be very critical Demand that offshore partner be very critical

• Understanding that they are taught not to criticize the customerUnderstanding that they are taught not to criticize the customer

Our use of a collaborative environment for offshore Our use of a collaborative environment for offshore development has:

development has:

• Validated our own product (SourceForge) for offshore developmentValidated our own product (SourceForge) for offshore development •

• Helped us improve SourceForge for managing offshore projectsHelped us improve SourceForge for managing offshore projects •

• Allowed us to meet our cost and productivity objectives while reAllowed us to meet our cost and productivity objectives while retaining taining control and flexibility

control and flexibility

Lessons learned

Lessons learned

(3)(3)

(17)

Auto-Auto-assignment of bugs & enhancement requests keeps work assignment of bugs & enhancement requests keeps work moving 24 x 7

moving 24 x 7

Automatic ‘Automatic ‘MonitoringMonitoring’’ optimizes workflowoptimizes workflow

• ‘‘MonitoringMonitoring’’ = automatic notification of problem situations based on = automatic notification of problem situations based on technical & business defined set of rules

technical & business defined set of rules •

• Keeps your finger on the pulseKeeps your finger on the pulse •

• ““File and forgetFile and forget”” •

All staff run standard, preAll staff run standard, pre-defined reports-defined reports

• Always on the Always on the ““same pagesame page”” based on real-based on real-time datatime data •

• No No ““dead treesdead trees”” that are out of date and have been “that are out of date and have been “massagedmassaged””

Practical Experiences

Practical Experiences

(1)(1)

(18)

Centralized project management for very early visibility into Centralized project management for very early visibility into possible problems

possible problems

• Staff is rewarded for early identification of problemsStaff is rewarded for early identification of problems •

• Penalized for late identificationPenalized for late identification •

Friendly, Cross-Friendly, Cross-team competition is valuableteam competition is valuable

Watch out for weak middleWatch out for weak middle-management-management

• In some cases, rapid growth of business has caused junior staff In some cases, rapid growth of business has caused junior staff to be to be promoted faster than is appropriate.

promoted faster than is appropriate. •

Take advantage of non $-Take advantage of non $-cost opportunitiescost opportunities

• What noWhat no--cost/low cost ways can you help your offshore partnercost/low cost ways can you help your offshore partner

It

Its your product, your cost, your business, your risk: s your product, your cost, your business, your risk: Own it!Own it!

Practical Experiences

(19)

““Knowledge Threading”Knowledge Threading” is invaluable for Knowledge retention is invaluable for Knowledge retention and transfer

and transfer

Practical Experiences

Practical Experiences

(3)(3)

(20)

“…

“…the size of an organization is the size of an organization is determined by the cost of gathering information. determined by the cost of gathering information.””

Nobel-winning economist Ronald Coase:

Practical Experiences

Practical Experiences

(4)(4)

Single, real

Single, real--time time

“dashboarddashboard”” view view of all projects is of all projects is invaluable invaluable

(21)

Colin Bodell

References

Related documents

The purpose of this research is to increase the productivity in construction projects by using LEAN tools also improve time, cost, quality and safety in construction by the using

► Also, costs can be estimated anew (agile cost estimation) ► Very flexible and agile.. Uwe Aßmann, Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät Informatik. 14 17.2 Managing EOS

Managing a variety of schemes and projects in such a manner to ensure that an expeditious, efficient and cost effective service is provided to meet the needs and priorities of

The 2014 water bond has earmarked $2.7 billion for water storage projects that improve the state water system, serve public benefits, and are cost-effective.. Assuming that