• No results found

Appendix: Evaluating Cloud Services Using Methods of Supplier Selection

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Appendix: Evaluating Cloud Services Using Methods of Supplier Selection"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Appendix: Evaluating Cloud Services Using Methods of

Supplier Selection

Stefan Harnisch1 and Peter Buxmann1,

1 Technische Universität Darmstadt, Chair of Information Systems, Hochschulstraße 1, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany

{harnisch,buxmann}@is.tu-darmstadt.de

Table 1: Analyzed journals, ranking according to VHB Jourqual [17].

Journal

Rank-ing Accessed via

Hits (Rele-vant) Ebsco-Host WoK Operations Research A+ x 0 (0)

Production and Operations Management A x 5 (0)

OR Spectrum A x 1 (0)

European Journal of Operational Research A x 29 (10) Operations Management Research B Springerlink 1 (0) Mathematics of Operations Research B x 0 (0) Journal of Operations Management B x 6 (0)

Annals of Operations Research B x 2 (1)

International Journal of Production Economics B x 55 (26) International Journal of Production Research B x 66

(27) Journal of Supply Chain Management B x 13 (4) Computers and Operations Research B x 12 (3) International Journal of Physical Distribution and

Logistics Management B x 15 (2)

Journal of the Operational Research Society B x 8 (4)

Omega B x 10 (4)

Decision Support Systems B x 2 (0)

Long Range Planning B x 0 (0)

Sum 225

(2)

Table 2: Occurrence of identified methods

Method Count Percentage

Fuzzy set theory 24 20,9%

AHP 22 19,1%

DEA 12 10,4%

Other 9 7,8%

Linear programming 9 7,8%

Other mathematical programming methods 8 7,0%

Genetic algorithms 6 5,2%

Literature-based comparisons 5 4,3%

ANP 4 3,5%

Goal programming 4 3,5%

Activity based costing 3 2,6%

Grey relational analysis 3 2,6% Multivariate statistical analysis 2 1,7% Other statistical methods 2 1,7%

(3)

Table 3: Occurrence of identified methods

Source

Methods AHP ANP Grey Fuzzy Lin.

Progr.

Math.

Progr. ABC DEA Goal progr.

Gen-etic Review

Multi-variate Statistical Other #

Aissaoui et al. (2007) x 1

Akarte et al. (2001) x 1

Amid et al. (2006) x x 2

Amid et al. (2009) x 1

Amid et al. (2011) x 1

Araz & Ozkarahan (2007) x 1

Awasthi et al. (2009) x 1

Bottani & Rizzi (2008) x x 2

Büyüközkan (2012) x x 2

Cakravastia et al. (2002) x 1

Cao & Wang (2007) x 1

Chan (2003) x 1

Chan et al. (2008) x x 2

Chan et al. (2011) x 1

Che & Chiang (2012) x x 2

Che (2010) x 1

Che (2010) x x 2

Chen & Chen (2006) x 1

Chen & Wang (2009) x 1

Chen (2009) x 1

Chen et al. (2006) x 1

Chou et al. (2007) x 1

Current & Weber (1994) x 1

Degraeve & Roodhooft (1999) x 1

Degraeve et al. (2000) x 1

(4)

Source AHP ANP Grey Fuzzy Lin. Progr.

Math.

Progr. ABC DEA Goal progr.

Gen-etic Review

Multi-variate Statistical Other #

Dotoli & Falagario (2012) x 1

Faez et al. (2009) x x 2

Falagario et al. (2012) x 1

Farzipoor Saen (2009) x 1

Feng et al. (2011) x 1

Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu & Hui Lin Hai

(2005) x 1

Ge Wang et al. (2004) x x 2

Ghodsypour & O'Brien (1998) x x 2

Golmohammadi & Mellat-Parast (2012) x x 2

He et al. (2009) x x 2

Ho et al. (2010) x 1

Huang & Keskar (2007) x 1

Humphreys et al. (2006) x 1

Ishizaka et al. (2012) x 1

Jayaraman et al. (1999) x 1

Kaufmann et al. (2010) x 1

Kumar et al. (2006) x x 2

Kuo & Lin (2012) x x 2

Labib (2011) x x 2

Lam & Tang (2006) x 1

Lasch & Janker (2005) x 1

Lee (2009) x x 2

Li & Zabinsky (2011) x 1

Liao & Rittscher (2007) x x 2

Lin (2012) x x x 3

Mafakheri et al. (2011) x 1

Narasimhan et al. (2001) x 1

Ng (2008) x 1

Noorul Haq & Kannan (2006) x 1

Osman & Demirli (2010) x 1

(5)

Source AHP ANP Grey Fuzzy Lin. Progr.

Math.

Progr. ABC DEA Goal progr.

Gen-etic Review

Multi-variate Statistical Other #

Pitchipoo et al. (2012) x x 2

Rezaei & Davoodi (2012) x 1

Roodhooft & Fonings (1997) x 1

Sadeghieh et al. (2012) x x x 3 Saen (2007) x 1 Sen et al. (2010) x x 2 Sevkli et al. (2007) x x 2 Sucky (2007) x 1 Talluri et al. (2006) x 1

Tam & Tummala (2001) x 1

Tsai & Hung (2009) x x x 3

Tsai (2009) x 1

Ustun & Demirtas (2008) x x 2

Vahdani & Zandieh (2010) x 1

Wang et al. (2009) x x 2 Weber et al. (1991) x 1 Wu & Blackhurst (2009) x 1 Wu & Olson (2008) x 1 Wu et al. (2008) x 1 Wu et al. (2010) x x 2 Xia & Wu (2007) x x 2 Xu & Ding (2011) x x 2 Yu et al. (2012) x x 2 Zhang et al. (2012) x x x 3 Sum 22 4 3 24 9 9 3 12 4 6 5 2 2 10

AHP: Analytical Hierarchy Process ANP: Analytical Network Process Grey: Grey theory

Fuzzy: Fuzzy theory

Lin. Progr.: Linear Programming

Math. Progr.: Mathematical Programming ABC: Activity Based Costing

DEA: Data Envelopment Analysis Goal progr.: Goal Programming Genetic: Genetic Algorithms

Review: Literature-based comparison Multivariate: Multivariate statistics Statistical: (Other) statistical methods Other: Everything else

(6)

References in the appendix

1. Aissaoui, N., Haouari, M., Hassini, E.: Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: A review. Computers & Operations Research 34, 3516–3540 (2007)

2. Akarte, M.M., Surendra, N.V., Ravi, B., Rangaraj, N.: Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52, 511 (2001)

3. Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S.H., O’Brien, C.: Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 104, 394–407 (2006)

4. Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S.H., O’Brien, C.: A weighted max–min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 131, 139–145 (2011)

5. Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S.H., O’Brien, C.: A weighted additive fuzzy multiobjective model for the supplier selection problem under price breaks in a supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics 121, 323–332 (2009)

6. Araz, C., Ozkarahan, I.: Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure. International Journal of Production Economics 106, 585–606 (2007)

7. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S., Goyal, S.K., Proth, J.-M.: Supplier selection problem for a single manufacturing unit under stochastic demand. International Journal of Production Economics 117, 229–233 (2009)

8. Bottani, E., Rizzi, A.: An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection—An application oriented to lead-time reduction. International Journal of Production Economics 111, 763–781 (2008)

9. Büyüközkan, G.: An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation. International Journal of Production Research 50, 2892–2909 (2012)

10. Cakravastia, A., Toha, I.S., Nakamura, N.: A two-stage model for the design of supply chain networks. International Journal of Production Economics 80, 231 (2002)

11. Cao, Q., Wang, Q.: Optimizing vendor selection in a two-stage outsourcing process. Computers & Operations Research 34, 3757–3768 (2007)

12. Chan, F.T.S.: Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Production Research 41, 3549–3579 (2003)

13. Chan, F.T.S., Shukla, M., Tiwari, M.K., Shankar, R., Choy, K.L.: B2B multi-attribute e-procurement: an artificial immune system based goal programming approach. International Journal of Production Research 49, 321–341 (2011)

14. Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M.K., Lau, H.C.W., Choy, K.L.: Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research 46, 3825–3857 (2008)

15. Che, Z.H.: A genetic algorithm-based model for solving multi-period supplier selection problem with assembly sequence. International Journal of Production Research 48, 4355–4377 (2010)

16. Che, Z.H.: Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and particle swarm optimisation for balanced and defective supply chain problems considering WEEE/RoHS directives. International Journal of Production Research 48, 3355–3381 (2010)

17. Che, Z.H., Chiang, T.-A.: Designing a collaborative supply-chain plan using the analytic hierarchy process and genetic algorithm with cycle-time estimation. International Journal of Production Research 50, 4426–4443 (2012)

18. Chen, C.-T., Lin, C.-T., Huang, S.-F.: A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics 102, 289–301 (2006)

19. Chen, C.-M.: A fuzzy-based decision-support model for rebuy procurement. International Journal of Production Economics 122, 714–724 (2009)

20. Chen, K.S., Chen, K.L.: Supplier selection by testing the process incapability index. International Journal of Production Research 44, 589–600 (2006)

21. Chen, L.Y., Wang, T.-C.: Optimizing partners’ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR. International Journal of Production Economics 120, 233–242 (2009)

22. Chou, S.-Y., Shen, C.-Y., Chang, Y.-H.: Vendor selection in a modified re-buy situation using a strategy-aligned fuzzy approach. International Journal of Production Research 45, 3113–3133 (2007)

23. Current, J., Weber, C.: Application of facility location modeling constructs to vendor selection problems. European Journal of Operational Research 76, 387–392 (1994)

24. Degraeve, Z., Labro, E., Roodhooft, F.: An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective. European Journal of Operational Research 125, 34–58 (2000)

25. Degraeve, Z., Roodhooft, F.: Effectively Selecting Suppliers Using Total Cost of Ownership. Journal of Supply Chain Management 35, 5–10 (1999)

26. Demirtas, E.A., Üstün, Ö.: An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation. Omega 36, 76–90 (2008)

27. Dotoli, M., Falagario, M.: A hierarchical model for optimal supplier selection in multiple sourcing contexts. International Journal of Production Research 50, 2953–2967 (2012)

28. Faez, F., Ghodsypour, S.H., O’Brien, C.: Vendor selection and order allocation using an integrated fuzzy case-based reasoning and mathematical programming model. International Journal of Production Economics 121, 395–408 (2009) 29. Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., Costantino, N., Pietroforte, R.: Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public

procurement tenders. European Journal of Operational Research 218, 523–529 (2012)

30. Farzipoor Saen, R.: Supplier selection by the pair of nondiscretionary factors-imprecise data envelopment analysis models. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60, 1575–1582 (2009)

31. Feng, B., Fan, Z.-P., Li, Y.: A decision method for supplier selection in multi-service outsourcing. International Journal of Production Economics 132, 240–250 (2011)

(7)

32. Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu, Hui Lin Hai: The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics 97, 308–317 (2005)

33. Ge Wang, Huang, S.H., Dismukes, J.P.: Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. International Journal of Production Economics 91, 1–15 (2004)

34. Ghodsypour, S.H., O'Brien, C.: A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics 56/57, 199–212 (1998)

35. Golmohammadi, D., Mellat-Parast, M.: Developing a grey-based decision-making model for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics 137, 191–200 (2012)

36. He, S., Chaudhry, S.S., Lei, Z., Wang Baohua: Stochastic vendor selection problem: chance-constrained model and genetic algorithms. Annals of Operations Research 168, 169–179 (2009)

37. Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K.: Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 202, 16–24 (2010)

38. Huang, S.H., Keskar, H.: Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics 105, 510–523 (2007)

39. Humphreys, P., McCloskey, A., McIvor, R., Maguire, L., Glackin, C.: Employing dynamic fuzzy membership functions to assess environmental performance in the supplier selection process. International Journal of Production Research 44, 2379– 2419 (2006)

40. Ishizaka, A., Pearman, C., Nemery, P.: AHPSort: an AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research 50, 4767–4784 (2012)

41. Jayaraman, V., Srivastava, R., Benton, W.C.: Supplier Selection and Order Quantity Allocation: A Comprehensive Model. Journal of Supply Chain Management 35, 50–58 (1999)

42. Kaufmann, L., Carter, C.R., Buhrmann, C.: Debiasing the supplier selection decision: a taxonomy and conceptualization. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 40, 792–821 (2010)

43. Kumar, M., Vrat, P., Shankar, R.: A fuzzy programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 101, 273–285 (2006)

44. Kuo, R.J., Lin, Y.J.: Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Research 50, 2852–2863 (2012)

45. Labib, A.W.: A supplier selection model: a comparison of fuzzy logic and the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Research 49, 6287–6299 (2011)

46. Lam, S.W., Tang, L.C.: Multiobjective vendor allocation in multiechelon inventory systems: a spreadsheet model. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57, 561–578 (2006)

47. Lasch, R., Janker, C.G.: Supplier selection and controlling using multivariate analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 35, 409–425 (2005)

48. Lee, A.H.I.: A fuzzy AHP evaluation model for buyer-supplier relationships with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. International Journal of Production Research 47, 4255–4280 (2009)

49. Li, L., Zabinsky, Z.B.: Incorporating uncertainty into a supplier selection problem. International Journal of Production Economics 134, 344–356 (2011)

50. Liao, Z., Rittscher, J.: A multi-objective supplier selection model under stochastic demand conditions. International Journal of Production Economics 105, 150–159 (2007)

51. Lin, R.-H.: An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation. International Journal of Production Economics 138, 55–61 (2012)

52. Mafakheri, F., Breton, M., Ghoniem, A.: Supplier selection-order allocation: A two-stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach. International Journal of Production Economics 132, 52–57 (2011)

53. Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., Mendez, D.: Supplier Evaluation and Rationalization via Data Envelopment Analysis: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Supply Chain Management 37, 28–37 (2001)

54. Ng, W.L.: An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research 186, 1059–1067 (2008)

55. Noorul Haq, A., Kannan, G.: Design of an integrated supplier selection and multi-echelon distribution inventory model in a built-to-order supply chain environment. International Journal of Production Research 44, 1963–1985 (2006)

56. Osman, H., Demirli, K.: A bilinear goal programming model and a modified Benders decomposition algorithm for supply chain reconfiguration and supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics 124, 97–105 (2010)

57. Petroni, A., Braglia, M.: Vendor Selection Using Principal Componet Analysis. Journal of Supply Chain Management 36, 63– 69 (2000)

58. Pitchipoo, P., Venkumar, P., Rajakarunakaran, S.: A distinct decision model for the evaluation and selection of a supplier for a chemical processing industry. International Journal of Production Research 50, 4635–4648 (2012)

59. Rezaei, J., Davoodi, M.: A joint pricing, lot-sizing, and supplier selection model. International Journal of Production Research 50, 4524–4542 (2012)

60. Roodhooft, F., Fonings, J.: Vendor selection and evaluation An activity based costing approach. European Journal of Operational Research 96, 97–102 (1997)

61. Sadeghieh, A., Dehghanbaghi, M., Dabbaghi, A., Barak, S.: A genetic algorithm based grey goal programming (G ) approach for parts supplier evaluation and selection. International Journal of Production Research 50, 4612–4630 (2012)

62. Saen, R.F.: Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. European Journal of Operational Research 183, 741–747 (2007)

63. Sen, C.G., Sen, S., Baslıgil, H.: Pre-selection of suppliers through an integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and max-min methodology. International Journal of Production Research 48, 1603–1625 (2010)

64. Sevkli, M., Koh, S.C.L., Zaim, S., Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E.: An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: a case study of BEKO in Turkey. International Journal of Production Research 45, 1973–2003 (2007)

(8)

65. Sucky, E.: A model for dynamic strategic vendor selection. Computers & Operations Research 34, 3638–3651 (2007) 66. Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., Nair, A.: Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained DEA approach.

International Journal of Production Economics 100, 212–222 (2006)

67. Tam, M.C.Y., Tummala, V.M.R.: An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega 29, 171 (2001)

68. Tsai, W.C.: Fuzzy measures of supplier evaluation under lean concepts. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60, 105– 1011 (2009)

69. Tsai, W.-H., Hung, S.-J.: A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value-chain structure. International Journal of Production Research 47, 4991–5017 (2009)

70. Ustun, O., Demı˙rtas, E.A.: An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection. Omega 36, 509–521 (2008)

71. Vahdani, B., Zandieh, M.: Selecting suppliers using a new fuzzy multiple criteria decision model: the fuzzy balancing and ranking method. International Journal of Production Research 48, 5307–5326 (2010)

72. Wang, Y.-M., Chin, K.-S., Leung, J.P.-F.: A note on the application of the data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Research 47, 3121–3138 (2009)

73. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C.: Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research 50, 2–18 (1991)

74. Wu, C.-W., Shu, M.H., Pearn, W.L., Liu, K.H.: Bootstrap approach for supplier selection based on production yield. International Journal of Production Research 46, 5211–5230 (2008)

75. Wu, D., Olson, D.L.: A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation. International Journal of Production Research 46, 2313–2327 (2008)

76. Wu, D.D., Zhang, Y., Wu, D., Olson, D.L.: Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach. European Journal of Operational Research 200, 774–787 (2010)

77. Wu, T., Blackhurst, J.: Supplier evaluation and selection: an augmented DEA approach. International Journal of Production Research 47, 4593–4608 (2009)

78. Xia, W., Wu, Z.: Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega 35, 494–504 (2007) 79. Xu, J., Ding, C.: A class of chance constrained multiobjective linear programming with birandom coefficients and its

application to vendors selection. International Journal of Production Economics 131, 709–720 (2011)

80. Yu, M.-C., Goh, M., Lin, H.-C.: Fuzzy multi-objective vendor selection under lean procurement. European Journal of Operational Research 219, 305–311 (2012)

81. Zhang, X., Lee, C.K.M., Chen, S.: Supplier evaluation and selection: a hybrid model based on DEAHP and ABC. International Journal of Production Research 50, 1877–1889 (2012)

References

Related documents

The main MTA/MS (Message Transfer Agent / Message Storage) has been installed at the Ezeiza ACC. The Meeting was also informed about the type of protocol, software/hardware and

• The USGS-NASA Landsat Science Team (LST) defines Landsat data continuity as the collection, archival, and distribution of image data of the Earth’s continents and

Nelson (2008) reported that, in general, students and academics prefer e-books to printed books for research purposes but not for the classroom, thus suggesting that e-books

If high equipment availability is to be achieved, maintenance work should be accomplished while the equipment is in operation. Units should only be shut down to rectify a

Agencies are required to develop and implement Fleet Improvement Plans incorporating specific targets for reducing fuel consumption and emissions, with a view to meeting operational

Is the Manager informed of all quality issues and corrective-actions taken: YES / NO ……… Are all Dealers provided with mandatory pre-delivery audit check-lists: YES / NO ………

The proposed system is adopting blowfish which least complex among many cryptographic algorithms by using such algorithm we can achieve better security by using dynamic

Even in this case, you can contact the Disputes Office and the Trade Unions and, with the assistance of a CGIL representative, you can proceed with a careful assessment and