• No results found

Shared Services Canada and Cloud Computing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Shared Services Canada and Cloud Computing"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Shared Services Canada and Cloud

Computing

Architecture Framework Advisory Committee

Transformation, Service Strategy and Design February 21, 2013

(2)

Agenda

TIME TOPICS PRESENTER(S)

9:30 – 9:40 Opening Remarks B. Long, Chair

9:40 – 9:55 Recap: From Cloud Framework to Cloud

Service B. Long

9:55 – 10:30 Cloud Deployment Models P. Littlefield All

10:30 – 10:40 Health Break

10:40 –11:30 SSC’s Cloud Platforms: Discussion P. Littlefield All

11:30 – 12:20 Challenges In-depth B. Long

All

(3)

Recap on Cloud-Computing Discussions

December 17, 2012  GCCC architectures and cloud- computing models examined and discussed with AFAC members January 28, 2013  Revised GCCC architectures feedback incorporated  Discussion of three use cases

 Platform strategy discussed February 21, 2013  Focus on platforms  Discussion on decision criteria for private versus hybrid versus public cloud services March 2013  Revised GCCC platform endorsed by AFAC

(4)

Cloud Computing: Defining Shared Services

Canada’s Role

Internal private cloud and external cloud services should be defined by the same service architecture?

• SSC could be the

Cloud Broker and

could also be a Cloud Provider.

• Some private cloud services could be provided by SSC.

• This would be the “Community Cloud”. • The Cloud Broker

would ensure multi-vendor management. SaaS PaaS IaaS SaaS PaaS IaaS

Resource Abstraction and Control Layer Physical Resource Layer

Hardware Facility Cloud Service Management Service Layer Business Support Provisioning / Configuration Portability /Interoperability Cloud Provider Cloud Broker Service Intermediation Service Aggregation Service Arbitrage Security Audit Cloud Auditor Privacy Impact Audit Performance Audit Cloud Consumer Cloud Carrier

Cross Cutting Concerns: Security, Privacy, etc.

(5)

Cloud Deployment Models – Directions

Use Cases

(samples)

Private Cloud On-prem Private Cloud Off-prem Virtual Private Cloud Public Cloud

Collaboration tools and applications

Sensitive data and applications

Public-facing websites

GC internal websites and

applications

Public-facing transactional websites

and applications

Databases

GC internal Dev/Test websites and

(6)

Platform Technologies – Potential Directions

TBD

Linux on Z/OS Technologies whose disposition will be determined over the coming months

Grow

Linux on X/86 Windows Technologies where investments will be made, transformation will focus, and new business and workloads will be directed

Sunset

HP/UX AIX MCP Solaris Technologies which will be phased out over the course of the transformation; workloads will be migrated to “Grow” platforms

Sustain

Z/OS Technologies that will be maintained at current business volumes, with organic current business growth; no new business or workloads will be directed here

(7)

GROW

Platform Technologies – Use Cases

Use Cases

Windows Linux/x86 Z/OS

Web Hosting

Application Hosting

Enterprise Resource Planning

Document Management

Collaboration

Virtual Desktop / Thin Client

File Services

(8)

Challenges In-depth:

Cloud Interconnectivity

Challenge: Connecting

resources across clouds and customer premises

Description:

People, process and technology required for multi-CSP, internal IT service management (ITSM)

orchestration

Forward Agenda items:

• CSB architecture and standards • Internal ITSM architecture and

standards

Mitigations

• Cloud service broker architecture / standards • Internal ITIL / ITSM

architecture / standards • GC Identity, Credential,

Access Management (ICAM) • Security and privacy controls

(9)

Challenges In-depth:

Identity / Access Control

Challenge 2: Managing identity, federation and access control

Description:

Transformation, migration to Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and the ICAM strategy

Forward Agenda items:

• ICAM architecture and standards • GC directory architecture and

standards

Mitigations

• ICAM implementation schedule

• GC-wide directory strategy and architecture

• Migration from departmental-based security to role-departmental-based access control

(10)

Challenges In-depth:

Multi-tenant Client Isolation

Challenge 3: Isolating tenants in a multi-tenant environment

Description:

Security considerations for multi-tenancy implementations versus the scale economics of sharing

Forward Agenda items:

• ICAM architecture and standards • GC directory architecture and

standards

Mitigations

• Clear definition / documentation of the various multi-tenant deployment architectures

• Cross reference / certification against GC security controls • Document application

compatibility considerations and standards

(11)

Challenges In-depth:

Network Readiness

Challenge 4: Network latency and capacity considerations

Description:

Cloud introduces new challenges for the network – both the internal GCNet and the Internet Access strategy

Forward Agenda items:

• GCNet considerations for cloud • Internet access architecture and

design for cloud

Mitigations

• Understanding the suite of potential latency sensitive cloud applications

• Data centre and CSP location impact analysis

• Legal review: impact on contracts, terms and SLAs • Develop standards /

architecture that meets or exceeds GC security

(12)
(13)

First Name Last Name Company/Association Industry Representatives

AFAC Participants: Cloud Computing

First Name Last Name Company/Association Association Representatives

Avvey Peters Communitech

Evan Fox Corporate Executive Board

Jeff Lynt CABiNET

Kris Van Riper Corporate Executive Board

Linda Oliver ITAC

Steve Woodward CATA/Cloud Perspectives

Tim Lewis CITPA Observer

Industry Representatives

Lynn Sutherland Canadian Cloud Council

John Cousens Canadian Cloud Council

Mario Bernier Northern Micro

Peter Fu TeraMach

Chris Makkreel Salesforce

James Lambe Google

John Schouten Dell

Mark Godfrey NetApp

Mike Cardy OnX

Strahan McCarten Bell

Brian O'Higgins Invest Ottawa

Don Powell Enterprise Architect, CABiNET

Jean-Olivier Le Brun CGI

Corey Glynn IBM

Lloyd Switzer Telus

Mike Monteith ThoughtWire

Edward Cordeiro AT Labs Canada

Ron Babin Ryerson University

Sasha Lebovic Cisco

Stuart MacKay HP

Vadim Schvarts VMware

Wally Kowal Canadian Cloud Computing

Jamie Hart Microsoft

Dave Wharry Oracle

Sébastien Boire-Lavigne Sagemcom Canada

References

Related documents

Common Cloud Management Platform (CCMP) Operational Support Services (OSS) Cloud Services Infrastructure-as-a-Service Platform-as-a-Service Software-as-a-Service

Hence we focus our study in an epidemic model in a two-layer network, and we use an isolation parameter w to measure the effect of quarantining infected individuals from both layers

Cloud Enabled Data Center Cloud Platform Services Cloud Service Provider Business Solutions on Cloud. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): Cut IT expense

If you spend time with a girl but you’re not sure she would sleep with you, don’t waste your time and move on to meet new people.. On the other hand, if you feel a solid connection

Consistent with the work of Christmann (2012) and Silke (2008), this study reveals no direct link between family and the development of extreme ideals: both formers and their

Database Design: The System Development Life Cycle (SDLC), The Database Life Cycle (DBLC), Database Design Strategies, Transaction Management and Concurrency

Cloud Consumer Cloud Provider Cloud Service Management Cloud Carrier Cloud Auditor Cloud Consumer Provisioning/ Configuration Portability/ Interoperability Security Audit

How does cloud Service Provider Support affect cloud