• No results found

Determinants of the Laplacians on the n dimensional unit sphere Sn

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Determinants of the Laplacians on the n dimensional unit sphere Sn"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Determinants of the Laplacians on the

n

-dimensional unit sphere

S

n

Junesang Choi

*

*Correspondence:

[email protected] Department of Mathematics, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, 780-714, Korea

Abstract

During the last three decades, the problem of evaluation of the determinants of the Laplacians on Riemann manifolds has received considerable attention from many authors. The functional determinant for thek-dimensional unit sphereSkwith the standard metric has been computed in several ways. Here we aim at computing the determinants of the Laplacians onSk(k= 2n+ 1) by mainly using certain closed-form evaluations of the series involving zeta function.

MSC: Primary 11M35; 11M36; secondary 11M06; 33B15

Keywords: gamma function; psi- (or digamma) function; Riemann zeta function; Hurwitz zeta function; Selberg zeta function; zeta regularized product; determinants of Laplacians; series associated with the zeta functions

1 Introduction and preliminaries

During the last three decades, the problem of evaluation of the determinants of the Lapla-cians on Riemann manifolds has received considerable attention from many authors in-cluding (among others) D’Hoker and Phong [, ], Sarnak [], and Voros [], who com-puted the determinants of the Laplacians on compact Riemann surfaces of constant cur-vature in terms of special values of the Selberg zeta function. Although the first interest in the determinants of the Laplacians arose mainly for Riemann surfaces, it is also interesting and potentially useful to compute these determinants for classical Riemannian manifolds of higher dimensions, such as spheres. Here, we are particularly concerned with the evalu-ation of the functional determinant for thek-dimensional unit sphereSk(k= n+ ) with

the standard metric.

For this purpose we need the following definitions. Let{λn}be a sequence such that

 =λ<λλ· · ·λn· · ·; λn↑ ∞(n→ ∞); (.)

henceforth we consider only such nonnegative increasing sequences. Then we can show that

Z(s) := ∞

n= 

λs n

, (.)

which is known to converge absolutely in a half-plane(s) >σ for someσ∈R.

(2)

Definition (cf.Osgoodet al.[]) The determinant of the Laplacianon the compact manifoldMis defined to be

det:= λk=

λk, (.)

where{λk}is the sequence of eigenvalues of the LaplacianonM. The sequence{λk}

is known to satisfy the condition as in (.), but the product in (.) is always divergent; so, in order for the expression (.) to make sense, some sort of regularization procedure must be used (see,e.g., []). It is easily seen that, formally,eZ()is the product of nonzero eigenvalues of. This product does not converge, butZ(s) can be continued analytically to a neighborhood ofs= . Therefore, we can give ameaningfuldefinition:

det:=eZ(), (.)

which is called thefunctional determinant of the LaplacianonM.

Definition  Theorderμof the sequence{λk}is defined by

μ:=inf

α>  ∞

k= 

λαk <∞

. (.)

The analogous and shifted analogous Weierstrass canonical productsE(λ) andE(λ,a) of the sequence{λk}are defined, respectively, by

E(λ) := ∞

k=

 – λ

λk exp

λ λk

+ λ

λk +· · ·+ λ[μ]

[μ]λ[kμ] (.)

and

E(λ,a) := ∞

k=

 – λ

λk+a exp

λ λk+a

+· · ·+ λ

[μ]

[μ](λk+a)[μ]

, (.)

where [μ] denotes the greatest integer part in the orderμof the sequence{λk}.

There exists the following relationship betweenE(λ) andE(λ,a) (see Voros []):

E(λ,a) =exp [μ]

m=

Rm–(–a)

λm m!

E(λa)

E(–a) , (.)

where, for convenience,

R[μ](λa) :=

d[μ]+

[μ]+

–logE(λ,a). (.)

The shifted seriesZ(s,a) ofZ(s) in (.) byais given by

Z(s,a) := ∞

k=  (λk+a)s

(3)

Formally, indeed, we have

Z(, –λ) = – ∞

k=

log(λkλ),

which, if we define

D(λ) :=exp–Z(, –λ), (.)

immediately implies that

D(λ) = ∞

k=

(λkλ).

In fact, Voros [] gave the relationship betweenD(λ) andE(λ) as follows:

D(λ) =exp–Z()exp

– [μ]

m=

FPZ(m)λ

m m

·exp

– [μ]

m=

Cm m–

k= 

k

λm

m!

E(λ), (.)

where an empty sum is interpreted to be nil and thefinite partprescription is applied (as usual) as follows (cf.Voros [, p.]):

FPf(s) :=

⎧ ⎨ ⎩

f(s) ifsis not a pole,

lim→(f(s+) –Residue ) ifsis a simple pole

(.)

and

Z(–m) = (–)mm!Cm. (.)

Now consider the sequence of eigenvalues on the standard LaplaciannonSn. It is

known from the work of Vardi [] (see also Terras []) that the standard Laplacian n

(n∈N) has eigenvalues

μk:=k(k+n– ) (.)

with multiplicity

qn(k) :=

k+n n

k+n– 

n =

(k+n– )(k+n– )!

k!(n– )!

=k+n–  (n– )!

n–

j=

(k+j) (k∈N), (.)

(4)

sequence{λk}is written in the following simple and tractable form:

λk=μk+

n–  

 =

k+n–  

(.)

with the same multiplicity as in (.).

We will exclude the zero mode, that is, start the sequence atk=  for later use. Further-more, with a view to emphasizingnonSn, we choose the notationsZ

n(s),Zn(s,a),En(λ), En(λ,a), andDn(λ) instead ofZ(s),Z(s,a),E(λ),E(λ,a), andD(λ), respectively.

We readily observe from (.) that

Dn

n–  

=detn, (.)

wheredetndenotes thedeterminants of the LaplaciansonSn(n∈N).

Several authors (see Choi [], Kumagai [], Vardi [], and Voros []) used the theory of multiple gamma functions (see Barnes [–]) to compute the determinants of the Laplacians on then-dimensional unit sphere Sn(nN:={, , , . . .}). Quine and Choi

[] made use of zeta regularized products to computedetnand the determinant of

the conformal Laplacian,det(Sn+n(n– )/). Choi and Srivastava [, ], Choiet al.

[], and Choi [] made use of some closed-form evaluations of the series involving zeta function (see [, Chapter ]) for the computation of the determinants of the Laplacians onSn(n= , , , , , , , ). In the sequel, here, we aim at presenting a general explicit

formula for the determinants of the Laplacians onSk(k= n+ ;nN) by mainly using a

summation formula of the series involving zeta function.

2 The Stirling numberss(n,k)of the first kind

We begin by recalling the Stirling numberss(n,k) of the first kind defined by the generating functions (see,e.g., [, Section .]; see also [, Section .])

z(z– )· · ·(zn+ ) =

n

k=

s(n,k)zk (.)

and

log( +z)k=k! ∞

n=k s(n,k)z

n n!

|z|< . (.)

The following recurrence relations are satisfied bys(n,k):

s(n+ ,k) =s(n,k– ) –ns(n,k) (nk≥); (.)

k

j s(n,k) = nj

=kj

n

(5)

It is not difficult to see also that

s(n, ) =

⎧ ⎨ ⎩

 (n= ),

 (n∈N), s(n,n) = , s(n,k) =  (k>n),

s(n, ) = (–)n+(n– )!, s(n,n– ) = –

n

(.)

and

n

k=

s(n,k) =  n∈N\ {};

n

k=

(–)n+ks(n,k) =n!;

n

j=k

s(n+ ,j+ )njk=s(n,k).

(.)

The Pochhammer symbol (z)nis defined (forz∈C) by

(z)n: = ⎧ ⎨ ⎩

 (n= ),

z(z+ )· · ·(z+n– ) (n∈N)

=(z+n)

(z)

n∈N;z∈C\Z–, (.)

in terms of the gamma function, andZ–:={, –, –, . . .}.

From the definition (.) ofs(n,k), the Pochhammer symbol in (.) can be written in the form

(z)n=z(z+ )· · ·(z+n– ) = n

k=

(–)n+ks(n,k)zk, (.)

where (–)n+ks(n,k) denotes the number of permutations ofnsymbols, which has exactly

kcycles.

For potential use, we observe the following simple properties related to s(n,k) in the lemma below.

Lemma  For n∈N,let n

j=

s(n,j)zj

n

j=

(–)n+js(n,j)zj

:= n

=

C(n)z.

Then we have

C(n) = –

j=

(–)js(n,j)s(n,j) and C+(n) =  (∈N). (.)

Proof It is easy to see the first expression forC(n). For the second one, it is enough to see that the defined product is an even function ofz.

(6)

Lemma  The values of C(n)when(,n) = (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ),are computed as

fol-lows:

C() = –; C() = –; C() = ; C() = –; C() = ;

C() = –; C() = –; C() = ; C() = –; C() = .

3 Series associated with the zeta functions

A rather classical (over two centuries old) theorem of Christian Goldbach (-), which was stated in a letter dated  from Goldbach to Daniel Bernoulli (-), was revived in  by Shallit and Zikan [] as the following problem:

ω∈S

(ω– )–= , (.)

whereSdenotes the set of all nontrivial integerkth powers, that is,

S:=nk|n,k∈N\ {}. (.)

In terms of the Riemann zeta functionζ(s) defined by

ζ(s) :=

⎧ ⎨ ⎩

n=ns =––s

n=(n–)s ((s) > ),

 ––s

n= (–)n–

ns ((s) > ;s= ),

(.)

Goldbach’s theorem (.) assumes the elegant form (cf.Shallit and Zikan [, p.])

k=

ζ(k) – =  (.)

or, equivalently,

k=

(k)= , (.)

whereF(x) :=x– [x] denotes thefractionalpart ofx∈R. As a matter of fact, it is fairly straightforward to observe also that

k=

(–)kFζ(k)=

, (.)

k=

(k)=  and

k=

(k+ )= 

. (.)

TheHurwitz(orgeneralized)zeta functionζ(s,a) is defined by

ζ(s,a) := ∞

k=

(k+a)–s (s) > ;a∈C\Z–, (.)

whereZ–

(7)

the whole complexs-plane except for a simple pole only ats=  with their residue . For easy reference, we recall some properties ofζ(s) andζ(s,a) as in the following lemma.

Lemma  Each of the following identities holds true.

ζ(s) =ζ(s, ) =s– –ζ

s,

 =  +ζ(s, ), (.)

ζ(s,a) =ζ(s,n+a) +

n–

k=

(k+a)–s (n∈N), (.)

ζ(s) =ζ(s,n+ ) +

n

k=

ks (n∈N), (.)

ζ(–n,a) = –Bn+(a)

n+  (n∈N), (.)

where Bn(a)and Bn:=Bn()are the Bernoulli polynomials and numbers,respectively(see

[, Section .];see also[, p., Eq. ()]).It is said that s= –n(n∈N)are the trivial zeros ofζ(s):

ζ(–n) =  (n∈N). (.)

It is known that

ζ(n) = (–)n+(π) n

(n)!Bn (n∈N) (.)

and

ζ(–n) =

⎧ ⎨ ⎩

(–)n (n)!

(π)(n+ ) (n∈N),

–log(π) (n= ). (.)

Employing the various methods and techniques used in the vast literature on the subject of the closed-form evaluations series associated with the zeta functions, Srivastava and Choi (see [, Chapter ], [, Chapter ], and see also the related references therein) presented a rather extensive collection of closed-form sums of series involving the zeta functions. For the use in the next section, we recall two general formulas as in the following lemma (see [, p.]).

Lemma  The following identity holds true: ∞

=

ζ(,a)

+j t

+j=

j

m=

j m ζ

(–m,at) + (–)mζ(–m,a+t)tjm

j–

m=

ζ(–m,a)

jm t

j–m– ζ(–j,a) jN

;|t|<|a|

. (.)

(8)

Lemma  The following identity holds true:

Further specialized formulas of the identity in (.), for later use, are obtained as in Lemma  below.

Lemma  Each of the following formulas holds true: ∞

(9)

Here, by using (.) and the results in the previous sections, we are ready to compute the determinants of the Laplacians onSk(k= n+ ) as in the following theorem.

and Hmare harmonic numbers defined by

(10)

and

where,for convenience,

P(n,j) :=

of which the last series is expressed in a closed-form as given in Lemma.

Proof In view of (.), the sequence{μk}of eigenvalues on the standard Laplaciann+ onSn+ is given as follows:μ

k:=k(k+ n) with multiplicityqn+(k) as in (.). Here

we consider the shifted sequence{λk}of{μk}bynas a fundamental sequence. Then the

sequence{λk}is written in the following simple and tractable form:

λk=μk+n= (k+n) (.)

In order to expressZn+(s) in terms of certain known functions, we first consider the corresponding multiplicityqn+(k): From (.), we have

(11)

which, in view of Lemma  (see also (.)), is expressed as follows:

qn+(k) = (–)n

(n)!

n

=

C(n)(k+n). (.)

Now it is easy to see that

Zn+(s) := ∞

k=

qn+(k) (k+n)s=

(–)n

(n)!

n

=

C(n)ζ(s– ,n+ ), (.)

whereC(n) is given in (.).

Since the Hurwitz zeta functionζ(s,a) has only a simple pole ats=  with its residue , it is seen thatZn+(s) has simple poles ats=+ / (= , , . . . ,n) with their respective

residue (–)nC

(n)/(n)!. Therefore we find from the finite part prescription (.) that

FPZn+(m) =Zn+(m) (m= , , . . . ,n). (.)

It is seen that applying (.) to (.) proves (.). Employing (.), (.), (.), and (.) in (.), we obtain the expressions (.), (.), and (.).

In view of (.), (.), and (.), we obtain

En+

n=

k=

 – n

(k+n)

qn+(k)

·exp

qn+(k)

n (k+n) +

n

(k+n)+· · ·+

nn

n(k+n)n . (.)

Taking the logarithm of both sides in (.) and considering

log( –x) = – ∞

=

x

(–x< ), (.)

we obtain

logEn+

n= –

=n+

n

k=

qn+(k)

(k+n). (.)

Applying (.) to (.), we get (.). Lettingj=in the definition ofP(n,j) in (.) and dropping the prime on, we obtain

P(n,j) = ∞

=n+–j

ζ(,n+ )

+j n

+j

= –

nj

=

ζ(,n+ )

+j n

+j+

=

ζ(,n+ )

+j n

+j

(n,j∈N; jn),

(12)

By settingn= , , ,  in (.), we givedetn+as in the following corollary.

Corollary The determinants of the Laplacians onSk(k= , , , )are given as follows:

det=πexp

ζ() π

, (.)

det=

π

 exp

  +

ζ() π –

ζ() π

, (.)

det=

π

 exp

–,  +

ζ() π –

ζ() π +

ζ() π

, (.)

det= –

,

, –, ––, π

·exp

,,, , +

,ζ() ,π

–,ζ() ,π +

ζ() π–

ζ() π

. (.)

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express his gratitude for the referees’ helpful comments to have this paper in the present improved form. This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0011005).

Received: 10 April 2013 Accepted: 22 July 2013 Published: 7 August 2013 References

1. D’Hoker, E, Phong, DH: On determinant of Laplacians on Riemann surface. Commun. Math. Phys.104, 537-545 (1986) 2. D’Hoker, E, Phong, DH: Multiloop amplitudes for the bosonic Polyakov string. Nucl. Phys. B269, 204-234 (1986) 3. Sarnak, P: Determinants of Laplacians. Commun. Math. Phys.110, 113-120 (1987)

4. Voros, A: Special functions, spectral functions and the Selberg zeta function. Commun. Math. Phys.110, 439-465 (1987)

5. Osgood, B, Phillips, R, Sarnak, P: Extremals of determinants of Laplacians. J. Funct. Anal.80, 148-211 (1988) 6. Quine, JR, Heydari, SH, Song, RY: Zeta regularized products. Trans. Am. Math. Soc.338, 213-231 (1993) 7. Vardi, I: Determinants of Laplacians and multiple gamma functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal.19, 493-507 (1988) 8. Terras, A: Harmonic Analysis on Symmetric Spaces and Applications, vol. I. Springer, New York (1985) 9. Choi, J: Determinant of Laplacian onS3. Math. Jpn.40, 155-166 (1994)

10. Kumagai, H: The determinant of the Laplacian on then-sphere. Acta Arith.91, 199-208 (1999) 11. Barnes, EW: The theory of theG-function. Q. J. Math.31, 264-314 (1899)

12. Barnes, EW: Genesis of the double gamma function. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.31, 358-381 (1900)

13. Barnes, EW: The theory of the double gamma function. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A196, 265-388 (1901) 14. Barnes, EW: On the theory of the multiple gamma functions. Trans. Camb. Philos. Soc.19, 374-439 (1904)

15. Quine, JR, Choi, J: Zeta regularized products and functional determinants on spheres. Rocky Mt. J. Math.26, 719-729 (1996)

16. Choi, J, Srivastava, HM: An application of the theory of the double gamma function. Kyushu J. Math.53, 209-222 (1999)

17. Choi, J, Srivastava, HM: Certain classes of series associated with the zeta function and multiple gamma functions. J. Comput. Appl. Math.118, 87-109 (2000)

18. Choi, J, Cho, YJ, Srivastava, HM: Series involving the zeta function and multiple gamma functions. Appl. Math. Comput.159, 509-537 (2004)

19. Choi, J: Determinants of the Laplacians on then-dimensional unit sphereSn(n= 8, 9). Honam Math. J.33(3), 321-333

(2011)

20. Srivastava, HM, Choi, J: Series Associated with the Zeta and Related Functions. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2001) 21. Srivastava, HM, Choi, J: Zeta andq-Zeta Functions and Associated Series and Integrals. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012) 22. Shallit, JD, Zikan, K: A theorem of Goldbach. Am. Math. Mon.93, 402-403 (1986)

23. Choi, J, Srivastava, HM, Quine, JR: Some series involving the zeta function. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc.51, 383-393 (1995)

doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2013-236

Cite this article as:Choi:Determinants of the Laplacians on then-dimensional unit sphereSn.Advances in Difference

References

Related documents

Lee Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013 72 http //www advancesindifferenceequations com/content/2013/1/72 R ES EA RCH Open Access Stability of quadratic functional equations

Sintunavarat et al Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013 49 http //www advancesindifferenceequations com/content/2013/1/49 R ES EA RCH Open Access Urysohn integral equations

Zhao et al Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013 48 http //www advancesindifferenceequations com/content/2013/1/48 R ES EA RCH Open Access Existence results for fractional q

Ahmed Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013 117 http //www advancesindifferenceequations com/content/2013/1/117 R ES EA RCH Open Access Fractional neutral evolution equations

Y?lmaz and ?zarslan Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013 107 http //www advancesindifferenceequations com/content/2013/1/107 R ES EA RCH Open Access Differential equations for

C?erm?k Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013 155 http //www advancesindifferenceequations com/content/2013/1/155 R ES EA RCH Open Access Some qualitative properties of linear

Pak and Park Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013 153 http //www advancesindifferenceequations com/content/2013/1/153 R ES EA RCH Open Access Persistence of the incompressible

Boichuk et al Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013 186 http //www advancesindifferenceequations com/content/2013/1/186 R ES EA RCH Open Access Systems of singular