• No results found

Communicating Effectively about Taxes. October 2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Communicating Effectively about Taxes. October 2013"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Communicating Effectively about Taxes

October 2013
(2)

2

Talking about Taxes

Our goal is to…..

help more Americans to

understand that taxes are the way we all help to support the public structures, systems and services that are essential to our democracy and our

(3)

3

Default Thinking on

Taxes

(4)

The topic of taxes is highly charged in American discourse, and has

been since our founding. But today, it seems almost impossible to talk rationally and pragmatically about tax policy choices. Unraveling our rhetoric about taxes and creating a more reasoned appreciation of their role and purpose is an important aspect of changing attitudes toward government in general.

(5)

5

“Legitimacy and a steady source of revenue provide the

twin foundations of any enduring government.”

- Marjorie E. Kornhauser

Despite Americans’ long history of protest over taxation, it is equally clear that the public structures we depend on today would not exist without our tax system. And our collective future is in jeopardy if we don’t have adequate and reliable revenues and public support for them.

(6)

6

Taxes have

become

disconnected

from their

purposes.

Unfortunately, research shows that people do not generally think about all the things we rely on every day that taxes help to pay for. Even when they do recall them they take them for granted,

assuming they will always be there and that any discussion about taxes must be for something “extra” or wasteful.

(7)

7 The disconnect between taxes and what they pay for manifests itself in many ways. In this example, protestors are bemoaning taxes while

(8)

Unfortunately, most

Americans view taxes as “taken money.” They are “theft” by the government that prevents individuals from paying for their own personal needs. This default perception is constantly reinforced by

typical media coverage and the anti-tax rhetoric that bombards us every day.

(9)

9

“Consumer

Thinking”

Fuels a sense that taxes are subtractive. When people view

government as a vending

machine of services “bought,” the core questions are not civic ones

but rather “what’s in it for me?” and “what is it going to cost?”

(10)

10

Recommendations for

Changing the

(11)

First, reconnect taxes to their purposes by

focusing on the public structures they fund.

(12)

12

Reconnect Taxes to Purpose

The public structures that underpin our

communities

– such as schools, roads, clinics,

police and fire protection, and health inspections –

all depend on a system of budgets and taxes that

supports them adequately now and into the

future.

Taxes are an essential part of the equation;

how they are raised and the level of resources they

provide

will affect our quality of life now and into

the future.

(13)

13

Next, reset the context.

Debates about taxes are often lodged in zero-sum arguments about costs and benefits in the current moment. Reset the context by focusing on the role taxes play in helping us meet future goals and objectives and reminding us that previous

generations paid taxes to construct the many public benefits we enjoy today.

(14)

14

Example of resetting the context

“On Tax Day, millions of Americans will do what

generations before have done –

contribute to our country's

future.

Just as our parents and grandparents paid taxes to

build the schools, transportation systems, health clinics and

parks we benefit from today, our tax payments this year

continue this effective system of

forward exchange.”*

* See a description of the “forward exchange” concept at:

(15)

15

Too much of our

language about taxes

infers that they are a

burden from which we

should be seeking

relief. Even the term

“taxpayer” reduces our

role to check-writer.

Avoid terms like:

• Tax Burden

• Tax Relief

• Hard-earned tax dollars

• Taxpayer

(16)

16

Taxes are

Loads

to be shared

not

Burdens

to avoid

We all have to carry

our share of the

“load” when it

comes to paying for

the things we all

(17)

17

People struggle

with notions of tax “fairness”

Fairness is a basic American value, but when it comes to taxes

“fairness is in the eye of the beholder.” Moreover, people often think that the simplest proposals are the most fair, e.g. flat income taxes or consumption taxes. It is sometimes difficult for people to see how a “progressive” tax system – one that expects the most from those who have the most – is the best design.

(18)

18

Fairness = Not Taxing Me

As Russell B. Long famously

said,

Don't

tax you,

don't tax

me

, tax that fellow behind the

tree

!“

Relying

only

on arguments

about fairness may generate a

willingness to tax others (e.g.

the wealthy, corporations) but

it may not help change overall

attitudes about taxation.

(19)

19

Why

should the wealthy and

corporations pay “their fair share?”

Efforts to focus on

those who should pay

more – such as the

wealthy and

corporations

– still

need to make a

practical case for

“why.”

(20)

20

An example of “why” some should pay

more

The public systems that our taxes support are the foundation of our nation’s economy. Everyone – individuals and businesses alike –

needs to shoulder an appropriate share of these costs. Our nation was built on the notion that those who have benefitted the most from our country’s public investments should also pay the most for their

upkeep. For some time now this basic principle has been eroding away. Over recent decades the share of taxes paid by high income earners and large corporations has been reduced while middle class families have paid more and our public systems have declined. This great American tax shift is undermining the foundations our economy and our society.

(21)

We cannot just

tell a

morality

tale;

we also

need a story of a

tax system

that

is upside down

and needs to be

(22)

22

Tips for fairness conversations

Take a

practical, management stance

(what is the best

tax structure to run a modern society).

Make it about a

tax “structure”

or

“system”

that needs to

be changed not just “greedy people and corporations.”

Try using terms like

“upside down,”

or

“out of balance,”

instead of “unfair.”

Find ways to turn attention to the investments in

public

systems & structures that make wealth and economic

success possible.

(23)

23

Summary of Recommendations

• Connect taxes to their purposes

• Elevate civic thinking not consumerism

• Reset the context and perspective

• Avoid triggering bad tax frames

• Make a practical case for fairness

(24)

For more information about talking about taxes, we encourage you to visit www.publicworks.org.

References

Related documents

This paper describes our experiences using Active Learning in four first-year computer science and industrial engineering courses at the School of Engineering of the Universidad

12-13 Katherine Day 17 Margaret 13-15 Maria 13 Marion Parker Martha Woods Mary Alice 17 Roger Sherman Sarah Birdseye Simon Newcomb Sylvia 15 WiUiam Dwight WiUiston Clapp WOODS Hiram

In this study we assessed species richness, diversity and faunal composi- tion of ant assemblages in four plant physiognomies along a gradient of plant succes- sion: grassland,

Seeking a new recipe for managing grain procurement Executive overview Company objectives Resolution Business transformation Future plans.. Allied

Such a collegiate cul- ture, like honors cultures everywhere, is best achieved by open and trusting relationships of the students with each other and the instructor, discussions

The project also held a practitioners’ re-launch conference at the start of the new academic year (Term 4) to which all participating schools were invited to

includes an application to offer a full functional spreadsheet utility which helps you develop worksheets both for performing calculations for existing financial

However, the service provider does not have to pay service tax until he collects the value of service, from the service receiver towards the taxable services provided by virtue