• No results found

Vol 3, No 5 (2012)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Vol 3, No 5 (2012)"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

International Journal of Mathematical Archive-3(5), 2012,

2058-2064

Available online through

ISSN 2229 – 5046

ON HARMONIC UNIFORMLY STARLIKE FUNCTIONS WITH OTHER POINTS

DEFINED BY AN INTEGRAL OPERATOR

*Olatunji S. O.

Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso P. M. B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria

(Received on: 25-01-12; Revised & Accepted on: 04-05-12)

ABSTRACT

The authors apply integral operator on

+

=

2

(

)

)

(

k

k k

p

z

a

z

ω

ω

to define a certain class of harmonic functions. They obtained coefficient inequalities, extreme points and distortion bounds for the functions in this class.

Keywords: Harmonic function, uniformly harmonic starlike and integral operator.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 30C45.

1. INTRODUCTION

For an arbitrary fixed positive

ω

in U, we denote by

H

p

(

ω

)

the set of all harmonic multivalent functions

g

h

f

=

+

which are sense-preserving in the open unit disk

U

=

{

z

:

z

<

1

}

where h and g are of the form

2 2

( )

(

)

p k

(

) ,

k

( )

k

(

) ,

k k

1

.

k k

h z

= −

z

ω

+

=

a z

ω

g z

=

=

b z

ω

b

<

(1)

The Integral operator In was introduced by Salagean [7]. For fixed positive integer n and for

f

=

h

+

g

given by (1) we have

(i)

I

0

f

(

z

)

=

f

(

z

)

(ii)

I

f

z

If

z

z0

f

t

t

1

dt

1

)

(

)

(

)

(

=

=

(iii)

I

n

f

(

z

)

=

I

(

I

n−1

f

(

z

)),

n

N

=

1

,

2

,

3

...

and

f

A

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

z

I

h

z

I

g

z

f

I

n

=

n

+

n n

Recently, Oladipo and Breaz [6], Clunie and Sheil-Small [2], Ahuja and Jahangiri [1], El-Ashwah and Aouf [4], Cotirla [3], Guney and Sakar [5] extended the operator studied in [6] and good results were obtained.

Here

,

( , ) ( )

,

( ) ( 1)

,

( , ) ( )

n n n n

p p p

I

ω

λ

l f z

=

I

ω

h z

+ −

I

ω

λ

l g Z

(2) where

+ =





+

+

+

+

+

=

1

,

(

)

,

)

1

(

1

)

1

(

1

)

(

)

(

)

,

(

p k

k k

n p

n

p

a

z

and

l

k

l

p

z

z

h

l

I

ω

λ

λ

ω

λ

ω

,

1

1

(

1)

( , ) ( )

(

) ,

1.

1

(

1)

n

n k

p k k

k p

p

l

I

l g z

b z

b

k

l

ω

λ

λ

ω

λ

= +

+

− +

=

<

+

− +

(2)

*Olatunji S. O. / ON HARMONIC UNIFORMLY STARLIKE FUNCTIONS WITH OTHER POINTS…. / IJMA- 3(5), May-2012, 2058-2064 P. M. B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria

For

0

α

<

1

,

n

N

,

λ

0

,

l

0

,

s

0

,

θ

R

.

For the purpose of our result, the following definition shall be necessary.

Definition A: Let

R

sω,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

the family of harmonic function f of the form (2) such that

,

,

( , ) ( )

Re (1

)

.

( , ) ( )

n p

i i

n q p

I

l f z

se

se

I

l f z

ω

θ θ

ω

λ

α

λ

+

+

(3)

For particular cases s and q, especially for

s

=

0

,

p

=

1

,

λ

=

1

,

l

=

0

and

q

=

1

,

ω

=

0

, we can write

)

,

(

)

,

,

0

,

1

,

1

(

1 ,

0

n

R

n

R

α

=

α

which is the class studied by Cotirla in [3].

Definition B: Let denote the subclass

R

s,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

ω

consists of harmonic functions

f

n

=

h

+

g

n in

)

,

,

,

,

(

,

l

n

p

R

sωq

λ

α

so that h and gn are of the form

,

1

1

(

1)

( , ) ( )

(

)

(

) ,

1

(

1)

n

n p k

p k

k p

p

l

I

l h z

z

a

z

k

l

ω

λ

λ

ω

ω

λ

= +

+

− +

= −

+

− +

(4) and

,

1

1

(

1)

( , ) ( )

(

) ,

1.

1

(

1)

n

n k

p k k

k p

p

l

I

l g z

b

z

b

k

l

ω

λ

λ

ω

λ

= +

+

− +

=

<

+

− +

In this work, we investigate the coefficient bounds, extreme points, distortion bounds and the convexity properties of the functions are also obtained.

2. MAIN RESULT

We prove the following sufficient conditions for harmonic functions in

R

s,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

.

Theorem 1: Let

f

=

h

+

g

be such that h and g are given by (1). If

2 1

[

(1

)

(

)]

[

(1

) ( 1)

(

)]

1.

1

1

n n q n q n q

k k

k k

s

s

s

s

a

b

γ

γ

α

γ

γ

α

α

α

+ +

∞ ∞

= =

+ −

+

+ − −

+

+

(5)

where





+

+

+

+

=

l

k

l

p

)

1

(

1

)

1

(

1

λ

λ

γ

then

f

R

s qω,

( , , , , ).

λ α

l

n p

Proof: Suppose that (5) holds. Using the fact that

Re

ω

ρ

if and only if

1

ρ

+

ω

1

ρ

+

ω

, it suffices to show that

(1

α

)

I

ωn q+

( , ) ( )

λ

l f z

+

I

ωn q+

( , ) ( )(1

λ

l f z

+

se

iθ

)

se I

iθ ωn q+

( , ) ( )

λ

l f z

(1

α

)

I

ωn q+

( , ) ( )

λ

l f z

I

ωn q+

( , ) ( )(1

λ

l f z

se

iθ

)

se I

iθ ωn q+

( , ) ( )

λ

l f z

0,

− −

+

+

(3)

substituting for

I

ωn

(

λ

,

l

)

f

(

z

)

and

I

ωn+q

(

λ

,

l

)

f

(

z

)

in (6) yields









+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+









+

+

+

+

+

+

=

+ ∞

= +

=

+ +

= +

1 2

1 2

)

(

)

1

(

1

)

1

(

1

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

1

)

1

(

1

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

k

k k

q n n

k

k q n p

i

k

k k

q n q

n k

k q n p

i

z

b

l

k

l

p

a

z

se

z

b

l

k

l

p

a

z

se

ω

λ

λ

γ

ω

ω

λ

λ

γ

ω

α

θ θ

2 1

1 1

(1

) (

)

( 1)

(

)

(1

) (

)

( 1)

(

)

i p n q n q n q k

k k

k k p

i p n q n n q k

k k

k k p

se

z

a

b z

se

z

a

b z

θ

θ

α

ω

γ

γ

ω

ω

γ

γ

ω

∞ ∞

+ + +

= = +

∞ ∞

+ +

= = +

− −

+

+ −

+ +

+

+ −

2

1

(2

)(

)

(1

(1

))

(

)

( 1)

(1

( 1)

(1

)) (

)

p n i q i k

k k

n n i q q i k k

k

z

se

se

a z

se

se

b z

θ θ

θ θ

α

ω

γ

γ

α

ω

γ

γ

α

ω

= ∞

=

+

+

+

− −

=

+ −

+

+ −

− −

= ∞

=

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

1 2

)

(

))

_

1

(

)

1

(

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

))

1

(

1

(

)

(

k

k k

i q

q i

n n k

k k

i q

i n

p

z

b

se

se

z

a

se

se

z

ω

α

γ

γ

ω

α

γ

γ

ω

α

θ θ

θ θ

k k

k q

q n

k k

k q

n p

z

b

s

s

z

a

s

s

z

)

2

[

1

)

(

)]

(

)

2

[

1

)

(

1

)

(

)]

(

)

(

)

1

(

2

1 2

ω

α

γ

γ

ω

α

γ

γ

ω

α

+

+

+

+

= ∞

=

2 1

[1 ) ( )] [1 ) ( 1) ( )]

21 () ( ) ` ( ) 2 ( ) .

1 1

n q n q q

p k p k p

k k

k k

s s s s

z

γ

γ α

a z

γ

γ α

b z

α

ω

ω

ω

α

α

∞ ∞

− −

= =

 + − + + − − + 

= − − − − − −

− −

This last expression is non-negative by hypothesis, and so the proof is complete.

The functions

,

2 1

1 1

( , ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) .

[ (1 ) ( )] [ (1 ) (1 ) ( )]

n p k k

s q n n q k n q n q k

k k

I l f z z x z y z

r r r r

α α

λ ω ω ω

γ γ α γ γ α

∞ ∞

+ +

= =

− −

= − + − + −

+ − + + − − +

(7)

shows that the coefficient bound given by (5) is sharp where

n

N

,

r

0

,

q

N

,

λ

0

,

l

0

and

.

1

1

2

=

+

= ∞

= k

k k

k

y

x

Theorem 2: Let

f

n

=

h

+

g

n be given by (4). Then

f

n

R

sω,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

. If and only if

2 2

[

(1

)

(

)]

[

(1

) ( 1)

(

)]

1,

1

1

n n q n q n q

k k

k k

s

s

s

s

a

b

γ

γ

α

γ

γ

α

α

α

+ +

∞ ∞

= =

+ −

+

+

+ − −

+

(8)

where





+

+

+

+

=

l

k

l

p

)

1

(

1

)

1

(

1

λ

λ

(4)

*Olatunji S. O. / ON HARMONIC UNIFORMLY STARLIKE FUNCTIONS WITH OTHER POINTS…. / IJMA- 3(5), May-2012, 2058-2064

Proof: Since

R

sω,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

R

sω,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

we only need to prove the ‘only if’ part of the theorem. For function fn of the form (4), we note that condition

α

λ

λ

θ ω ω θ

+

+ i

n q n n n i

se

z

f

l

I

z

f

l

I

se

)

(

)

,

(

)

(

)

,

(

)

1

(

Re

is equivalent to

+

+

+ +

)

(

)

,

(

)

)(

(

)

,

(

)

(

)

,

(

)

1

(

Re

z

f

l

I

se

z

f

l

I

z

f

l

I

se

n q n i n q n n n i

λ

α

λ

λ

ω θ ω ω θ

[

]

[

]





+

+

+



+

+

+

=

∞ = + − + ∞ = + ∞ = + − + ∞ = + ∞ = + − + ∞ = + ∞ = − ∞ = 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

Re

k k k q n q n k k k q n p k k k q n q n k k k q n p i k k k q n q n k k k q n p k k k n n k k k n p i

z

b

z

a

z

z

b

z

a

z

se

z

b

z

a

z

z

a

z

a

z

se

ω

γ

ω

γ

ω

ω

γ

ω

γ

ω

α

ω

γ

ω

γ

ω

ω

γ

ω

γ

ω

θ θ

[

]

[

]





+

+

+

+



+

+

+

=

∞ = + − + ∞ = + ∞ = + − ∞ = + − + ∞ = + ∞ = + 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

)(

1

(

Re

k k k q n q n k k k q n p k k k i q n q i n n k k k q n q n k k k q n p k k k i q n i n p

z

b

z

a

z

z

b

se

se

z

b

z

a

z

z

a

se

se

z

ω

γ

ω

γ

ω

ω

α

γ

γ

ω

γ

ω

γ

ω

ω

α

γ

γ

ω

α

θ θ θ θ 2 2 1 2 1

( ) 2 1

( ) 2

2 1

2

(1

)

(1

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

( 1)

(

)

Re

( 1)

(1

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

( 1)

p

n i n q i k p k

k

n q k p n q n q k

k k

k k

z n n i n q i k k

z k

n q k p n q n k

k

se

se

a

z

a

z

b

z

se

se

b

z

a

z

θ θ

ω θ θ

ω

α

γ

γ

α

ω

γ

ω

γ

ω

γ

γ

α

ω

γ

ω

γ

+ = ∞ + + −+ = = ∞ − − + − = ∞ + + − + =

+

+

+ −



=

+

+

+

+ −

1

0.

(

)

q k k

k

b

z

ω

∞ =

 ≥

(9)

Upon choosing the value of

(

z

ω

)

on the positive real axis and using

Re(

e

iθ

)

e

iθ

=

1

where

1

)

(

)

(

0

z

ω

=

r

+

d

<

, the above inequalities reduces to

2

2 1

2 1

(1

)

(1

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

( 1)

(

)

n n q k p k

k

n q k p n q n q k p

k k

k k

s

s

a

r

d

a

z

b

r

d

α

γ

γ

α

γ

ω

γ

+ = ∞ + + −+ = =

+ −

+

+

=

+ −

+

2 2 1

(1

)

(

)

(

)

0.

1

(

)

( 1)

(

)

n i n q i k p k

k

n q k p q n q k p

k k

k k

se

se

b

r

d

a

r

d

b

r

d

θ θ

γ

γ

α

γ

γ

+ = ∞ + + = =

+

+

+

+

− −

+

(10) If the condition (8) does not hold, then the numerator (10) is negative for sufficiently close to 1.

Thus there exist

z

0

ω

=

r

0

+

d

in (0, 1) for which the quotient in (10) is negative. This contradicts the condition

(5)

Convex hull of

R

sω,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

).

Theorem 3: Let fn be given by (2) if and only if

[

]

=

+

=

1

)

(

)

(

)

(

k

nk k k

k

n

z

X

h

z

Y

g

z

f

where

,...)

3

,

2

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

1

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

=

+

+

=

=

+

z

k

s

s

z

z

h

z

z

h

k

q n n

p k

p

ω

α

γ

γ

α

ω

ω

and





+

+

+

+

=

l

k

l

p

)

1

(

1

)

1

(

1

λ

λ

γ

,...)

3

,

2

,

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

1

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

1

,

=

+

+

+

=

+

k

z

s

s

z

z

g

nk p n

γ

n

γ

n q

α

ω

k

α

ω

1

1

(

1)

0,

0,

(

) 1.

1

(

1)

k k k k k

p

l

X

Y

X

Y

k

l

λ

γ

λ

∞ =

+

− +

=

+

=

+

− +

In particular, the extreme points of

R

sω,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

)

are hk and gn,k.

Proof: For function fn of the form (2), we have

[

]

=

+

=

1

)

(

)

(

)

(

k

nk k k

k

n

z

X

h

z

Y

g

z

f

[

]

2 1

1

(

)

(

)

(1

)

(

)

p k

k k n n q k

k k

X

Y

z

X

z

s

s

α

ω

ω

γ

γ

α

∞ ∞

+ =

=

+

=

+ −

+

1

1 ,

1

( 1)

(

)

(1

)

(

)

n k

k n n q

k

Y z

s

s

α

ω

γ

γ

α

∞ −

+ =

+ −

+ −

+

Then

2 1

1

1 2

(1

)

(

)

1

(1

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(1

)

(

)

1

(1

)

(

)

1

1.

n n q n n q

k k

k k

n n q n n q

k k

k k k k

s

s

s

s

X z

Y z

s

s

s

s

X

Y

X

γ

γ

α

α

ω

γ

γ

α

α

ω

α

γ

γ

α

α

γ

γ

α

+ +

∞ ∞

+ +

= =

∞ ∞

= =

+ −

+

+

+ −

+

+ −

+

+ −

+

=

+

= −

and so

f

n

R

s,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

ω

.

Conversely, suppose

f

n

R

s,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

ω

. Letting

=

=

+

=

1 2

1

1

,

k k k k

Y

X

X

...)

3

,

2

(

1

)

(

)

1

(

=

+

+

=

s

+

s

a

k

X

k

q n n

k

α

α

γ

γ

and

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

+

s

q n+q

+

s

n

γ

α

(6)

*Olatunji S. O. / ON HARMONIC UNIFORMLY STARLIKE FUNCTIONS WITH OTHER POINTS…. / IJMA- 3(5), May-2012, 2058-2064

We obtained the required representation, since

1

1 1

( )

(

)

p

(

)

k

( 1)

n

(

)

k

n k k

k k

f z

z

ω

a

z

ω

b

z

ω

∞ ∞

= =

= −

+ −

1

2 1

2 1

2 1 2 1

1

1

(

)

(

)

( 1)

(

)

(1

)

(

)

(1

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

( )]

(

)

( )]

1

(

)

( )

( )

[

( )

p k n k

k k

n n q n n q

k k

p p p

k k nk k

k k

p

k k k k k nk

k k k k

k k k

z

X

z

Y z

s

s

s

s

z

z

h z X

z

g

z Y

X

Y

z

X h z

Y g

z

X h z

Y

α

α

ω

ω

ω

γ

γ

α

γ

γ

α

ω

ω

ω

ω

∞ ∞

+ +

= =

∞ ∞

= =

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

= = = =

= −

+ −

+ −

+

+ −

+

= −

= −

+

=

+

2

( )].

k

gnk z

=

Distortion bounds for functions in

R

s,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

ω

is our next result.

Theorem 4: Let

f

n

R

s,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

ω

. Then for

z

ω

= + <

r

d

1,

we have

2 1

1

(

)

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

1

)

)(

1

(

)

(

b

r

d

s

s

s

s

s

s

d

r

b

z

f

n n q

q q

n n

p

n

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+ +

α

γ

γ

α

α

γ

γ

α

and

2 1

1

(

)

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

1

)

)(

1

(

)

(

b

r

d

s

s

s

s

s

s

d

r

b

z

f

n n q

q q

n n

p

n

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+ +

α

γ

γ

α

α

γ

γ

α

where q is a an odd positive integer.

Proof: We prove the right hand inequality. Let

f

n

R

s,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

ω

. Taking the absolute value of fn,… we obtain

1

2

( )

(1

)(

)

p

(

)(

)

k

n k k

k

f z

b

r

d

a

b

r

d

=

≤ +

+

+

+

+

2 1

2

(1

)(

)

p

(

k k

)(

)

k

b

r

d

a

b

r

d

=

≤ +

+

+

+

+

2

1 1

2

1

(1

)

(

)

(1

)(

)

(

)(

)

(1

)

(

)

1

n n q p

k n n q

k

s

s

b

r

d

a

b

r

d

s

s

α

γ

γ

α

γ

γ

α

α

+ ∞

+

=

+ −

+

≤ +

+

+

+

+

+ −

+

=

+ +

+  +

  

 

+ −

+ + −

+ −

+ −

+ −

+ − +

+ + ≤

2

2

1 ( )

1

) ( ) 1 ( 1

) ( )

1 ( )

( ) 1 (

1 )

)( 1 (

k

k q

n n

k q

n n

q n n

p

d r b s s

a s s

s s

d r b

α

α

γ

γ

α

α

γ

γ

α

γ

γ

α

2 1

1

2 1

1

) ( ) ( )

1 (

) ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) ( )

1 (

1 )

)( 1 (

) ( 1

) ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( 1 ) ( )

1 (

1 )

)( 1 (

d r b s s

s s

s s

d r b

d r b s s

s s

d r b

q n n

q q

n n

p

q q

n n

p

+    

 

+ −

+

+ − − + − + −

+ − +

+ + ≤

+    

 

+ − − + − + −

+ − +

+ + ≤

+ +

+

α

γ

γ

α

α

γ

γ

α

α

α

α

γ

γ

α

(7)

Convex combination for the function

R

sω,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

:

Theorem 5: The family

R

ωs,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

is closed under convex combination.

Proof: For i=1, 2,…, suppose that

f

ni

R

ωs,q

(

λ

,

l

,

α

,

n

,

p

)

, where

= ∞

=

+

=

1 2

1

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

k

k i

k k

n k

i k p

i

n

z

z

a

z

b

z

f

ω

ω

ω

then by Theorem 2,

=

+ ∞

=

+

+

+

+

+

+

1 2

)

(

2

1

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

1

)

(

)

1

(

k

i k q

n q n

k

i k q

n n

x

b

s

s

a

s

s

α

α

γ

γ

α

α

γ

γ

for

=

=

1

1

,

0

1

i

t

i

t

i , the

convex combination of

f

ni may be written as

1

1 2 1 2 1

( )

(

)

(

)

( 1)

(

) .

i p i k n i k

i n i k i k

i k i k i

t f

z

z

ω

t a

z

ω

t b

z

ω

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

= = = = =

= −

+ −

∑ ∑

∑ ∑

Then by (x)

=

= +

=

= +

+

+

+

+

+

1 1

2 1

1

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

1

)

(

)

1

(

k i

i k i q

n q n

k i

i k i q

n n

b

t

s

s

a

t

s

s

α

α

γ

γ

α

α

γ

γ

2

2

1

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

1

)

(

)

1

(

1 1

2 1

=

+

+

+

+

+

= ∞

=

+ ∞

=

+ ∞

= i

i k

i k q

n q n

k

i k q

n n

i

i

b

t

s

s

a

s

s

t

α

α

γ

γ

α

α

γ

γ

and therefore ` ,

1

( )

( , , , , ).

i

i n s q

i

t f

z

R

l

n p

ω

λ α

=

REFERENCES

[1] Om. P. Ahuja and J. M. Jahangiri: Multivalent harmonic starlike functions, Ann. Univ. Marie Cruie-Sklodowska Sect. A, LV 1(2001), 1-13.

[2] J. Clunie and T. Sheil-Small: Harmonic univalent functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A. I. Math. 9(1984), 3-25. [3] L. I. Cotrla: Harmonic univalent functions defined by an integral operator, Acta Universitatis Apulensis,

17(2009), 95-105.

[4] R. M. El-Ashwah and M. K. Aouf: Differential subordination and super ordination for certain subclasses of analytic functions involving an extended integral operator.

[5] H. Ozlem Guney and F. Muge Sakar: On Harmonic uniformly starlike functions defined by an integral operator, Acta Universitatis Apulensis, 28(2011), 293-301.

[6] A. T. Oladipo and D. Breaz: On a new class of harmonic multivalent functions defined by extended integral operator. (Submitted).

[7] G. S. Salagean: Subclass of univalent functions, Lecture notes in Math. Springer-Verlag, 1013 (1983), 362-372.

References

Related documents

Microsoft Word thesis 18 3 3 doc Planning of Mega Projects Influence of Execution Planning on Project Performance Author T Slootman Planning of Mega Projects Influence of Execution

this end on the matters of rehabilitation, general amnesty and other related is- sues and activities. 1) An agreement as signed between the government and the tribal refugee

Alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin (TB), total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) levels were

Determination of in vitro Antifungal Activity: All the compounds were evaluated for their in-vitro antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger, Candida albicans,

Recombinant inbred lines in cluster VI had medium number of panicle plant-1, longest panicle length, largest number of total grains plant -1 , medium 1000 seed

The fraction of parasites with positive Mitotracker staining was determined using 143B/260 host cells after HDQ treatment with and without the addition of oligomycin.. Oligomy-

Among the other chitin pathway mutants tested (Table 3), the ace2 ⌬ mutant produced dark pigment at levels comparable to those of the control strain, while melanization was reduced

Infectious Mononucleosis and Reye's Syndrome: A Fatal Case with Studies