• No results found

APPROXIMATING COMMON ELEMENTS OF THE SET OF AMENABLE SEMIGROUP AND VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY AND INFINITE FAMILY OF NON-EXPANSIVE MAPPINGS AND GENERALIZED MIXED EQUILIBRIUM PROBLEMS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "APPROXIMATING COMMON ELEMENTS OF THE SET OF AMENABLE SEMIGROUP AND VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY AND INFINITE FAMILY OF NON-EXPANSIVE MAPPINGS AND GENERALIZED MIXED EQUILIBRIUM PROBLEMS"

Copied!
23
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

28

APPROXIMATING COMMON ELEMENTS OF THE SET OF AMENABLE SEMIGROUP AND VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY AND

INFINITE FAMILY OF NON-EXPANSIVE MAPPINGS AND GENERALIZED MIXED EQUILIBRIUM PROBLEMS

Qiang LI1,* & Jun LI2

Department of Mathematics and Information, China West Normal University, Sichuan

637009

, P. R. China;

Corresponding Author E-mail address: [email protected] (Qiang LI) ABSTRACT

In this paper, we introduce a new iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of fixed point of an infinite family of non-expansive mappings and left amenable semigroup, the set of solution of generalized mixed equilibrium problem and the set of solutions of the variational inequalities for solving inverse strongly monotone mappings in Hilbert spaces by using a hybrid steepest descent methods. Then strong convergence of the scheme to a common element of the three sets is proved. Our results improve and generalize some well-known results in the literature.

Key-words: common fixed point; non-expansive mapping; amenable semigroup; generalized mixed equilibrium problem; variational inequality; hybrid steepest descent method.

MR(2010) Subject Classification 47H09; 47H10; 47H20

1. INTRODUCTION

Let

H

be a real Hilbert space whose inner product and norm are denoted by

 , 

and

 

, respectively. When

}

{ x

n is a sequence in

H

, we denote strong convergence of

{ x

n

}

to

xH

by

x

n

x

and weak convergence by

x

n

† x

.

Let

 : CR

be a real-valued function and be

A : CH

a nonlinear mapping. Suppose

F : CC

into

R

is an equilibrium bi-function. That is,

F ( u , u ) = 0,  uC

. The generalized mixed equilibrium problem is to find

xC

such that

. 0,

, ) ( ) ( ) ,

( x y y x Ax y x y C

F           

(1.1)

We shall denote the set of solutions of this mixed equilibrium problem by

GMEP

. Thus

}.

0, ,

) ( ) ( ) , ( : {

:= x C F x y y x Ax y x y C

GMEP

   

 

   

If

 = 0

,

A = 0

, then problem (1.1) reduces to equilibrium problem, which is to find

x

C

such that

. 0,

) ,

( x y y C

F

  

(1.2)

If

 = 0

, then problem (1.1) reduces to generalized equilibrium problem, which is to find

x

C

such that

. 0,

, )

,

( x y Ax y x y C

F

 

   

(1.3)

If

A = 0

, then problem (1.1) reduces to mixed equilibrium problem, which is to find

x

C

such that

. 0,

) ( ) ( ) ,

( x y y x y C

F

   

  

(1.4)

If

F ( x

, y ) =  Ax

, yx

, then the problem (1.3) is reduced to the variational inequality problem of finding

C

x

such that

. 0,

, y x y C

Ax     

(1.5)

The set of solutions of (1.5) is denoted by

VI ( C , A )

. Many problems in applied sciences, such as monotone inclusion problems, saddle point problems, optimization problems, variational inequality problems, Nash equilibrium problems, and equilibrium problems as special cases. Some methods have been proposed to solve

) , ( C A

VI

,

EP (F )

and

SEP ( F

i

)

; see, for example [1,2] and references therein.

(2)

29

Definition 1.1. Let

A : CH

be nonlinear mappings. Then

A

is called (1)monotone if

AxAy , xy   0,  x , yC

;

(2)

 

inverse strongly monotone if there exists a constant

 > 0

such that

; , ,

, x y Ax Ay

2

x y C

Ay

Ax       

  P P

(3)

-strictly pseudo-contractive if there exists a constant

  (0,1)

such that

; , , ) ( )

(

2

2

2

x y I A x I A y x y C

Ay

Ax  P  P  P  P    P  

P 

(4)For the variational inequality, the following is true:

0;

>

), (

= )

,

( C A u P uA

VI

u  

C

(5)Let

A

be an inverse strongly monotone mapping of

C

into

H

, and let

N

C

(v )

be the normal cone to

C

at

v

, that is

N

C

( v ) = { wH :  vu , w   0}

for all

uC

, and define

 

. ,

, ), ( )

= ( )

( v C

C v v N v v B

Q

C

Then

Q

is the maximal monotone and

0  Q ( v )

if and only if

xVI ( C , B ).

In 2001, Yamada [3]introduced the following iterative scheme called the hybrid steepest descent method :

0, ,

1

=   

Sx BSx n

x

n n

n

n (1.6)

where

x

1

= xH

,

{ 

n

}  (0,1)

, let

B : HH

be a strongly monotone and Lipschitz continuous mapping and

is a positive real number. He proved that the sequence

{ x

n

}

generated by (1.6) converges strongly to the unique solution of the

F ( S )  VI ( C , B ).

In 2007, Plubtieng and Punpaeng [5] considered the iteration process generated by

0, ,

) 1 (

) (1

) (

=

,

1 0

0

H x

f xx    sT s x ds n

x

sn n

n n n n

n n n

n

   

(1.7)

where

{ 

n

}, { 

n

}  (0,1)

with

n

 

n

< 1

and

{ t

n

}

is a positive real divergent sequence. They proved, under certain appropriate conditions on

{ 

n

}

, that

{ x

n

}

converges strongly to a common fixed point of one-parameter non-expansive semigroup

 = { T ( s ) : s  0}

.

Very recently,Jitpeera et al.[5],introduced the iterative scheme based on viscosity and Ces ¨¤ ro mean

1.8 0, 1 ,

) 1 )

((1 )

(

=

), (

) (1

=

, 0,

1 , ) ( ) ( ) , (

0

=

1

 

 

T y n

A n I

x y

rf x

Bu u

P u

y

C y x

u u r y u y y u

n i n

i n

n n

n n n n

n n n C n n

n n

n n n n

n n

where

B : CH

a

 

inverse strongly monotone,

 : CR  {  }

is a proper lower semi-continuous and convex function,

T

i

: CC

is a non-expansive mapping for all

i = 1,2,3,  , n

,

{ 

n

}

,

{ 

n

}

,

{ 

n

}  (0,1)

,

) (0,2 }

{ 

n

 

, and

{ r

n

}  (0,  )

satisfy the following conditions (i)

lim

n

n

= 0

and

n=1

n

= 

;

(ii)

lim

n

n

= 0

;

(iii)

0 < liminf

n

n

 limsup

n

n

< 1

;

(3)

30 (iv)

n

 [ e , g ]  (0,2  )

,

lim

n

| 

n1

 

n

|= 0

; (v)

liminf

n

r

n

> 0

and

lim

n

| r

n1

r

n

|= 0

.

They show that if

 := 

ni=1

Fix ( T

i

)  VI ( C , B )  MEP (  ,  )

is nonempty, then the sequence

x

n converges strongly to the

z = P

( IArf )( z )

which is the unique solution of the variational inequality

. 0,

, )

(       

rf A z x z y

In this paper, motivated and inspired by Yamada.

[3]

, Plubtieng and Punpaeng [5], we introduce a new iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of fixed point of an infinite family of non-expansive mappings and left amenable semigroup, the set of solution of generalized mixed equilibrium problem and the set of solutions of the variational inequalities for solving inverse strongly monotone mappings in Hilbert spaces by using a hybrid steepest descent methods. Then strong convergence of the scheme to a common element of the three sets is proved. Our results improve and generalize some well-known results in the literature.

2. PRELIMINARIES LEMMA

2.1 ([6]) Let

S

be a semigroup and

C

be a nonempty closed convex subset of a reflexive Banach space

E

. Let

} : {

= T

t

x tS

be a non-expansive semigroup on

H

such that

{ T

t

x : tS }

is bounded for some

xC

, let

X

be a subspace of

B (S )

such that

1  X

and the mapping

t   T

t

x , y

is an element of

X

for each

C

x

and

y

E

, and

is a mean on

X

. If we write

T

x

instead of

T

t

xd(t )

, then the followings hold . (i)

T

is non-expansive mapping from

C

into

C

;

(ii)

T

x = x

for each

xFix (  )

;

(iii)

T

xc o { T

t

x : tS }

for each

xC

.

Lemma 2.2 ([7]) Let

H

be a real Hilbert spaces, there hold the following identities:

(i)for each

xH

and

x

C

,

x

= P

C

x   xx

, yx

  0

for all

yC

; (ii)

P

C

: HC

is non-expansive,that is,

P

C

xP

C

y    xy

for all

x , yH

;

(iii)

P

C is firmly non-expansive,that is,

P

C

xP

C

y

2

  P

C

xP

C

y , xy

for all

x , yH

; (iv)

tx  (1  t ) y

2

= tx

2

 (1  t )  y

2

t (1  t )  xy

2

,  t  [0,1]

, for all

x , yH

;

(v)

xy

2

  x

2

 2  y , xy

.

Lemma 2.3 ([7]) Each Hilbert space

H

satisfies Opial's condition, that is, for any sequence

{ x

n

}  H

with

x

x

n

†

, the inequality

liminf ,

liminf  x x  <  x

n

y

n n n

hold for each

yH

with

yx

.

Lemma 2.4 ([7]) Let

H

be a Hilbert space, let

C

be a nonempty closed convex subset of

H

. Let

 > 0

and let

H

C

B : 

be an

 

inverse strongly monotone. If

0 <  < 2 

, then

I   B

is a non-expansive mapping of

C

into

H

.

Lemma 2.5 ([8]) Let

{ x

n

}

and

{ y

n

}

be bounded sequences in a Banach space

E

and let

{ 

n

}

be a sequence in

[0,1]

with

0 < liminf

n

n

 limsup

n

n

< 1

. Suppose

x

n1

= 

n

x

n

 (1  

n

) y

n for all integers

 0

n

and

(4)

31

0.

) (

limsup

1

 

1

 

n n

 

n n

n

x x y y

Then,

lim

n

y

n

x

n

 = 0

.

Lemma 2.6 ([9]) Let

{ a

n

}

be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers such that

0.

, )

1

 (1   

b a b c n

a

n n n n n

where

{ b

n

}

and

{ c

n

}

are sequences of real numbers satisfying the following conditions

(i)

(0,1), = ;

0

=

 

n n

n

b

b

(ii)either

limsup

n

c

n

 0

or

n=0

| b

n

c

n

|<

. Then,

lim

n

a

n

= 0

.

Lemma 2.7 ([10]) Assume

A

be a strongly positive linear bounded operator on

H

with coefficient

 > 0

and

<

1

0   A

. Then

I   A   1   

.

Throughout this article, we assume that a bi-function

F : CCR

satisfies the following conditions:

(A1)

F ( x , x ) = 0

for all

xC

;

(A2)

F

is monotone, i.e.,

F ( x , y )  F ( y , x )  0

for all

x , yC

; (A3)for each

x , y , zC

,

lim

t0

F ( tz  (1  t ) x , y )  F ( x , y )

; (A4)for each

xC

,

y  F ( x , y )

is convex and lower semi-continuous.

(B1)for each

xH

and

r > 0

there exist a bounded subset

D

x

C

and

y

x

C

such that for any

0,

<

1 , ) ( ) ( ) ,

(     yz zx

z r y

y z

F

x

x

x

(B2)

C

is a bounded set.

Lemma 2.8 ([11]) Assume that

F : CCR

satisfies

A (1)  A (4)

and let

 : CR

be a proper lower semi-continuous and convex function. Assume that either

(B 1)

or

(B 2)

holds. For

xH

and

r > 0

, define a

mapping

T

F

C R

rn( ,)

: 

as follows:

}.

0, 1 ,

) ( ) ( ) , ( : {

= )

)

(

,

(

y z z x y K

z r y y

z F C z x T

F

rn

            

for all

zC

. Then, the following hold:

(1)for each

xC

, (F,)

 

rn

T

;

(2) (F,)

rn

T

is single-valued;

(3) (F,)

rn

T

is firmly non-expansive, i.e., for any

x

,

yC

,

;

)

,

, ( ) , ( 2 ) , ( ) ,

(

xT y   T xT y xy

T

F

rn F

rn F

rn F

rn

(4)

F ( T

(F, )

) = GMEP ( F );

rn

(5)

GMEP (F )

is closed and convex.

Lemma 2.9 ([12]) Let

T : CH

be a k-strict pseudo-contraction. Define

S : CH

by

Tx x

Sx =   (1   )

for each

xC

. Then, as

  [k ,1)

,

S

is a non-expansive mapping such that

) (

= ) ( S F T

F

.

(5)

32

Lemma 2.10 ([13]) Let

H

be a Hilbert space, let

C

be a nonempty closed convex subset of

H

. Suppose that

H C

T : 

is non-expansive, then, the mapping

IT

is demiclosed at zero.

Lemma 2.11 ([14]) Let

H

be a real Hilbert space space.For

q

which solves the variational inequality

0 ,

)

(    

rfF q p q

,

f

H,

pF (T )

, the following statement is true :

,

= ) (

0 ,

)

( rfF q pq    P IFrf q q

 

where

 := 

n=1

F ( T

n

)  F ( S )  VI ( C , B )  GMEP  

.

Let

T

1

, T

2

, 

be an infinite family of mappings of

C

into itself and let

1

, 

2

, 

be a sequence of real numbers such that

0  

i

< 1

for every

iN

. For any

nN

, define a mapping

W

n of C into C as follows:

. ) (1

=

=

, ) (1

=

, ) (1

=

, ) (1

=

, ) (1

=

, ) (1

= ,

=

1 ,2

1 1 ,1

2 2,3

2 ,2

1 ,

1 1 1

,

1 , ,

1 ,

1 1 1

,

1 , ,

1 ,

I U

T U

W

I U

T U

I U

T U

I U

T U

I U

T U

I U

T U

I U

n n

n

n n

k k

n k k k

n

k k

n k k k

n

n n

n n n n

n

n n

n n n n

n n n

Such a mapping

W

n is called the

W

mapping generated by

T

1

, T

2

,  , T

n and

1

, 

2

,  , 

n

.

Lemma 2.12 ([15,16]) Let

C

be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space

H .

Let

T

1

, T

2

, 

be an infinite family of mappings of

C

into itself such that

n=1

F ( T

n

)  

, let

1

, 

2

, 

be real numbers such that

1

<

0  

n

b

for every

n  1

. Then,

(1)for every

xC

and

kN

, the limit

lim

n

U

n,k

x

exists;

(2) the mapping

W

of

C

into itself as follows:

. lim ,

lim =

= W x U

,1

x x C

Wx

n

n n n

is a non-expansive mapping satisfying

F ( W ) = 

n=1

F ( T

n

)

, which is called the

W

mapping generated by

T

n

T

T

1

,

2

,  ,

and

1

, 

2

,  , 

n

;

(3)

F ( W

n

) = 

n=1

F ( T

n

)

, for each

n  1

;

(4)If

E

is any bounded subset of

C

, then

lim sup P Wx W

n

x P = 0.

E n x

3. MAIN RESULTS THEOREM

3.1 Let

C

be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space space

H

,

A : CH

be an

 

inverse

strongly monotone,

B : CH

be an

 

inverse strongly monotone,

f

be a contraction of

C

into itself with coefficient

  (0,1)

,

A

is a strongly positive linear bounded operator on

H

with coefficient

 > 0

and

 < 

<

0

. Let

{ F

k

, k = 1,2,  , M }

be a finite family of bi-functions from

CC

to

R

which satisfy

(4) (1) A

A

,

 : CR  {  }

be a proper lower semi-continuous and convex function with assumption

(6)

33

(1)

B

or

B (2)

, and

{ T

i

}

i=1 an infinite family of non-expansive mapping of

C

into itself.

S

a semigroup and

} : {

= T

t

x tS

be a non-expansive semigroup from

C

into

C

such that

Fix (  ) = 

tS

Fix ( T

t

)  

. Let

X

be a left invariant subspace of

B (S )

such that

1  X

, and the function

t   T

t

x , y

is an element of

X

for each

xC

and

yH

,

{ 

n

}

a left regular sequence of means on

X

such that

lim

n

 

n1

 

n

 = 0

. Assume that

 := 

n=1

F ( T

n

)  F ( S )  VI ( C , B )  GMEP  

.If the sequences

{ x

n

}

,

{ y

n

}

and

{ u

n

}

are generated iteratively by

x

1

C

and

 

 

) (

) )

((1 ) (

=

) (

=

) (

) (1

=

1 ) , (

n n n n n n C n

n n n n n n

n n n F rn n

n n n C n n n n

u BW u

W P T A I

x u

rf x

y r y T u

Bx x

P x

y

where

{ 

n

}

and

{ 

n

}

are two sequences in

(0,1)

. Assume that the following restrictions are satisfied (C1)

0 < liminf

n

n

 limsup

n

n

< 1

;

(C2)

lim

n

n

= 0

and

n=1

n

= 

;

(C3)

{ 

n

}, { 

n

}  [ c , d ]  (0,2  )

and

liminf

n

| 

n1

 

n

|= liminf

n

| 

n1

 

n

|= 0

; (C4)

{ 

n

}  [0, b ]

for some

b  (0,1)

and

lim

n

| 

n1

 

n

|= 0

;

(C5)

0 < r

n

< 2 

and

lim

n

| r

n1

r

n

|= 0

,

where

b

,

c

,

d

are real numbers. Then the sequence

{ x

n

}

,

{ y

n

}

and

{ u

n

}

converges strongly to a point

q  

, which is the unique solution of the variational inequality

. 0,

, )

(       

  A rf q p q p

(3.2)

Equivalently, we have

q = P

( I   Arf )( q )

.

Proof We shall divide the proof into several steps.

Seting

v

n

= P

C

( x

n

 

n

Bx

n

)

,

e

n

= P

C

( W

n

u

n

 

n

BW

n

u

n

)

.

Step 1. We show that the mapping

P

( I   Frf )

has a unique fixed point.

Since

f

be a contraction of

C

into itself with coefficient

  (0,1)

. Then, we have

. , , )) (

(1

=

) (1

) ( ) (

) )(

( ( ) ))(

( ( ) ))(

( ( ) ))(

( (

C y x y x r

y x y

x r

y x A I y f x f r

y A I rf x A I rf y

A I rf P x A I rf P



Since

0 < 1  (    r  ) < 1

, it follows that

P

( I   Frf )

is a contraction of

C

into itself. Therefore, by the Banach Contraction Mapping Principle, has a unique fixed point, say

qC

that is,

).

)(

(

= P I A rf q

q

  

Step 2.We claim that if

{ x

n

}

is a bounded sequence in

C

, then

lim 

1 n

 = 0

n n n

T

n

eT

e

and

n n

n

BW

W  

is non-expansive.

These two assertion are proved in

[15, step 3]

and

[16, step 2]

.

Step 3. We show that the sequence

{ x

n

}

,

{ y

n

}

,

{ e

n

}

and

{ u

n

}

are bounded.

(7)

34 In fact, let

x

 

, then

x

= P

C

( x

 

n

Bx

)

.

Since

I  

n

B

is a non-expansive mapping (Lemma 2.4), we obtain

.

) (

) (

=

) (

) (

) (

) (

=

x x

x B I x B I

Bx x

Bx x

Bx x

P Bx x

P x

v

n

n n

n

n n

n n

n C

n n n C n

(3.3)

.

=

) (1

) (1

x x

x x x

x

x v x

x x

y

n

n n n

n

n n n

n n

(3.4)

1).

, 2

<

(

) 2 (

) ) (

) (

) (

) (

=

) (

=

2

2 2

2

2 )

, ( )

, (

2 )

, ( 2

n r

x y

x y r

r x y

x r I y r I

x r x T y r y T

x y r y T x

u

n n

n n

n n

n n

n

n F

rn n n n F rn

n n n F rn n

(3.5)

Let

e

n

= P

C

( W

n

u

n

 

n

BW

n

u

n

)

, we can prove that

.

) (

) (

=

) (

) (

) (

) (

=

x x

x u

x BW W

u BW W

x BW x

W u

BW u

W

x BW x

W P u BW u

W P x

e

n n

n n n n n n n

n n n n

n n n n

n n n C n n n n n C n

(3.6)

which yields that

) }.

( ) , (

{

) ) (

(

) ) ) (

) (

(1

=

) (1

) (

) (1

) (

) (1

) ( )

( ) (

) (1 )

(

) )(

) ((1 ) (

) )

( (

=

1

 

 

r Ax x

x rf x max

Ax x

r rf x r

x r

x x x

x Ax

x rf x

x r

x x x

x Ax

x rf x

u r

x e x

x Ax

x rf x

f u f r

x e T A I

x x Ax

u rf

x e T A I

x x Ax

u rf

x x

n

n n

n

n n n n

n n

n n

n n n n

n n

n n

n n n n

n n

n n

n n n

n n

n n

n

n n n

n n

n n

n n

 

 

 

 



By induction,

. ) }

( ) , (

{

1

n N

r Ax x

x rf x max x

x

n

 

 

 

 

(3.7)

and we obtain

{ x

n

}

is bounded. So are

{ y

n

}

,

{ u

n

}

,

{ e

n

}

,

{ v

n

}

,

{ BW

n

u

n

}

,

{Bxn }

and

{ f ( u

n

)}

.

Step 4.We show that

lim

n

x

n1

x

n

 = 0

,

lim

n

u

n1

u

n

 = 0

,

lim

n

e

n1

e

n

 = 0

and

References

Related documents

Cytokine ligation results in dimeriza− tion of plasma membrane receptors, activation of JAK kinases, and phos− phorylation of receptor cytoplasmic domain tyrosine residues..

To test this possibility, we combined embryological and molecular approaches in chick embryos to show that, at gastrula stage, adenohypophyseal precursors are clustered in the

10·13 Many patients who had remained childless have been treated successfully and the treatment is safe for both male and female patients.. In this report,

The experiments presented in Section 5 show the relation between the amount of pairs of records used for training and the results obtained in the end of the process of generation

2 Ratio of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and unbound plasma atabecestat (JNJ-54861911) concentration in Caucasian patients with preclinical Alzheimer ’ s disease (AD) and patients with

Within the domain of philosophy, information should not have two definitions with different mean- ings, namely, definition in the sense of ontology and definition in a sense of a