Dr. Zhenhe (Song) Song
[email protected]
GHD Pty Ltd
Civil Engineering Analysis and Modelling (CIVL3140)
Part 1
Geomechanics (Plaxis)
Dr. Zhenhe Song
[email protected]
Part 2
Hydraulics (Fluent)
A/Prof. Tongming Zhou (Unit coordinator)
[email protected]
Part 3
Structures (Multiframe)
Mr. Philip Christensen
[email protected]
All the students to set up PLAXIS Version 9
software before tutorial.
If you get your laptop this year, you may have
PLAXIS 2010, you need to reinstall Plaxis V9
Please try to run PLAXIS in your laptop and make
sure it works well.
Please ask help from the IT support if you have
any problems to open PLAXIS.
IT Support: Keith Russell [email protected]
2x2hrs sessions per week
First 2hrs: Lecture (Theory)
Second 2hrs: Tutorials (Practice)
4 weeks in total
6% Weekly Practice; 14% Assignment
40% Exam (combined)
This note has incorporated the note from previous
teaching by
Prof. Yuxia Hu
The development of tutorial questions by
Dr. Long
Yu
Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: theory,
David
M. Potts, Lidija Zdravkovi
Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: application,
David M. Potts, Lidija Zdravkovi
Guidelines for the use of advanced numerical analysis,
David Potts,
Kennet Axelsson, Lars Grande, Helmut Schweiger and Michael
Long
Modelling and FEM in Geotechnical Engineering
Stability
Loading on Structure
Footing;
Retaining Wall and Deep Excavation;
Piles and Bridge Abutment;
Embankment, Dams and Seawalls;
Tunnel;
Stockpile;
Dynamic (Seismic Analysis)
Soils are neither elastic, nor homogeneous.
Soils around the world vary.
Same soil with different saturations and
consolidations behaves differently.
Soil properties are difficult to measure.
In situ vs laboratory testing …
13
Geotechnical engineering is complex. It is not
because you’re using the FEM that it becomes
simpler;
The quality of a tool is important, yet the quality of
a result (mainly) depends on the user’s
understanding of both the problem and the tool;
The design process involves considerably more
than analysis.
Traditional methods of analysis often use
techniques that based on assumptions that over
simplify the problem at hand.
These methods lack the ability to account for all of
the factors and variables the design engineer
faces and may severely limit the accuracy of the
solution.
Equilibrium (stress)
Compatibility (strain)
Constitutive
Relationship
(stress-strain)
Boundary Condition
Solution of Geotechnical Problems Numerical “Exact” or Closed Form Empirical, Based on Experience Limit Analysis Discrete Element Finite Element Finite Difference Boundary Element Finite/ Boundary Element 17 Limit Equilibrium
Method of Analysis Solution Requirements Design Information Stress Equilibrium Compatibility Constitutive behaviour Stability Displacements Limit equilibrium (P) X Rigid plastic X Slip-line method (P) X Rigid plastic X Limit Analysis -Lower Bound -Upper Bound X X Perfectly plastic X X Displacement finite element Any P– partially satisfied 18
Receive Design Prescriptions
(from a client)
Obtain Soil Properties
(Site investigations and lab testing)
Model Geotechnical Problem
Detailed Design Report
19
http://www.cofs.uwa.edu.au/Researh/centrifugeprojects.html
http://www.pbase.com/image/41209293
Geotechnical model
Numerical modelling
Plain strain or axisymmetric
Footing (B/2)
CL
Discretisation (mesh):Divide the model field (soil and/or
structure) into parts (nodes and elements)
Displacement Approximation: Over each part (element),
displacement is expressed as function of nodal values
Element Equation: Use an approximate variational principle (e.g.
minimum potential energy) to derive an element equation
KU
E=P
E23
Global Equation: Then assemble the parts of element equation
to form a global equation
KU=P
Boundary Condition: Formulate boundary conditions and modify
global equations. Loads affect P, displacement affect U
Solutions: Solve displacement values at nodes and then stress
and strain can be evaluated
Footing (B/2) Element x x x Node
Gauss point (integration point)
x
CL
25
Element Type Degree of Freedom
per Element
Plane Strain Axisymmetric
Integration rule Gauss point Constraints per Element Ratio Degrees of Freedom Constraints Suitable Integration rule Gauss point Constraints per Element Ratio of Degrees of Freedom Constraints Suitable 3-noded constant Strain triangle 1 1-point 1 1 Y 3-point 3 1/3 N 6-noded linear Strain triangle 4 3-point 3 4/3 Y 6-point 6 2/3 N 10-noded quadratic Strain triangle 9 6-point 6 3/2 Y 12-point 10 9/10 N 15-noded cubic Strain triangle 16 12-point 10 8/5 Y 16-point 15 16/15 Y 4-noded quadrilateral 2 2x2 3 2/3 N 3x3 5 2/5 N 8-noded quadrilateral 6 3x3 6 1 Y 3x3 9 2/3 N 12-noded quadrilateral 10 4x4 10 1 Y 4x4 13 10/13 N 17-noded quadrilateral 16 5x5 14 8/7 Y 5x5 19 16/19 N
26 x y u v 1 2 3 Function: u(x,y) = a1 + a2x + a3y v(x,y) = b1 + b2x + b3y (x1, y1) u1, v1 (x3, y3) u3, v3 (x2, y2) u2, v2 u1 = u(x1, y1) = a1 + a2x1 + a3y1 u2 = u(x2, y2) = a1 + a2x2 + a3y2 u3 = u(x3, y3) = a1 + a2x3 + a3y3 3 2 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 2 1
1
1
1
a
a
a
y
x
y
x
y
x
u
u
u
u = ?
Solve for a1, a2, a327
2A
)
x
y(x
)
y
x(y
)
y
x
y
(x
2A
)
x
y(x
)
y
x(y
)
y
x
y
(x
2A
)
x
y(x
)
y
x(y
)
y
x
y
(x
N
N
N
N
1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 3 2 1N
0
N
0
N
0
0
N
0
N
0
N
v
u
U
v
u
v
u
v
u
Function of (x,y) Function of (x,y)6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N v u U v u v u v u v u v u v u 28 x y u v 1 2 3 (x1, y1) u1, v1 (x3, y3) u3, v3 (x2, y2) u2, v2
u = ?
6 5 4 (x6, y6) u6, v6 (x5, y5) u5, v5 (x4, y4) u4, v4 Function: u(x,y) = a1 + a2x + a3y + a4x2 + a 5xy + a6y2 v(x,y) = b1 + b2x + b3y + b4x2 + b 5xy + b6y2 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 6 6 6 2 6 6 6 2 5 5 5 2 5 5 5 2 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a a a a a a y y x x y x y y x x y x y y x x y x y y x x y x y y x x y x y y x x y x u u u u u uStrain within an element: Displacement: u(x,y) = a1 + a2x + a3y + a4x2 + a 5xy + a6y2 v(x,y) = b1 + b2x + b3y + b4x2 + b 5xy + b6y2 Strain: 29 u v 1 2 3 6 5 4
y
a
x
a
a
x
u
5 4 2 xx2
y
b
x
b
y
v
6 5 3 yyb
2
y b a x b a a b x y y u ) 2 ( ) 2 ( ) ( 2 3 5 4 6 5 xye
U
B
e
30
Constitutive Relation
Stress and strain can be written in vector form and then expressed as
D
31 1 2 3 6 5 4 P1x P1Y
Body forces and surface tractions applied to the element may be generalized into a set of forces acting at the nodes
Based on an appropriate variational
principle (e.g. minimum potential energy) to derive element equations:
e
e
P
U
e
K
wherev
DBd
B
K
e TIn order to get [Ke], integration (gaussian
integration) must be performed for each element. Basically, the integral of the function is replaced by weighted sum of the function at a number of
32
The stiffness for the complete mesh is evaluated by combining the individual element stiffness matrixes assembly)
This produces a square matrix K of dimension equal to the number of degree-of-freedom in the mesh
The global vector of nodal forces P is obtained in a similar way by assembling the element nodal force vectors
The assembled stiffness matrix and force vector are related by:
P
U
33 1 44 1 34 1 33 1 24 1 23 1 22 1 14 1 13 1 12 1 11 1 33 1 43 1 44 1 24 1 23 1 22 1 14 1 13 1 12 1 11 K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K 2 66 2 56 2 55 2 46 2 45 2 44 1 44 2 36 2 35 2 34 1 34 2 33 1 33 1 24 1 23 1 22 1 14 1 13 1 12 1 11 2 55 2 65 2 66 2 45 2 46 2 44 2 35 2 36 2 34 2 33 K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K
Find symmetrical features, central
line can be a roller boundary.
(CL)
(1)
Soil domain needs to be large
enough to avoid boundary effect.
(10x(B/2), 10x(B/2))
The bottom boundary can be fixed
boundary.
(2)
The side boundary can be roller
boundary.
(3)
Top boundary is normally a free
boundary.
(4)
34 CL Footing (B/2) 10x(B/2) 10x(B/2) 1 2 3 4Element size
:
the smaller, the more accurate
Element type
:
the higher order, the more accurate
Boundary conditions
:
domain size, realistic
Constitutive model
:
complexity
economy
Soil parameters
:
realistic, measurable
Understanding of the real problem
numerical
model
Less elements to reduce computation time
Smaller elements to increase accuracy
36
Optimum Mesh
Combination of coarse and fine mesh
37