September 13-16, 2009
Waikoloa, HI
Bi
i
ti T
th I
l
t b
Biomimetic Tooth Implants by
Electron Beam Melting
Electron Beam Melting
Mari Koike, DDS, PhD1; Gilbert Chahine2; Radovan
Kovacevic, PhD2; Toru Okabe, PhD1
1 Department of Biomaterials Science, Baylor College of Dentistry, Texas A&M
Health Science Center 3302 Gaston Avenue Dallas Texas 75246 USA Health Science Center, 3302 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA
Present Status of Dental Implants
p
• Research and development continues in dental sciences.
• Successful rehabilitation of many dental clinical
it ti i lit
situations is now a reality
• 69% of adults ages 35 to 44 have lost at least one t t th
permanent tooth
• 26% of adults have lost all of their permanent teeth by age 74
Present Status of Dental Implants
(cont.)
O ti f ti t i i t t th
• Option for patients missing permanent teeth:
– Removable dentures and fixed bridges
– Dental implants (long-term replacements placed in the jawbone) – Dental implants (long-term replacements placed in the jawbone)
• In 2004, nearly 800,000 dental implants were done in the U.S.
U.S.
• In 2002, $150 million of implants were sold to North American dentists
Present Status of Dental Implants
(cont.)
• Mostly generic in formy g • Fabricated by machining
• Extra-low interstitial Ti-6Al-4V is used when enhanced ductility and toughness are required • Require enhanced ductility and toughness
• Titanium alloys successfully used
– They represent the best compromise between
bi h i l t th bi tibilit d t ti l f biomechanical strength, biocompatibility, and potential for relative motion
Generic Dental Implants
p
Crown (C)
( )
Transmucosal
Abutment (B)
( )
Implant
Fixture (A)
Complications in Implant Components
• Fatigue failure of the screw due to
Di t f th ( ll th th t )
– Diameter of the screw (smaller than other components) – Fracture
Screw loosening – Screw loosening – Fatigue
• Screw loosening is reported in 38% of prostheses • Screw loosening is reported in 38% of prostheses
• Some fracture by fatigue, in vivo, at the abutment screw and prosthesis screw
Radiograph of ITI implant with
g
p
p
abutment screw fatigue fracture
One-piece Implants
p
p
• Fabricated in one piece, with the root-form
implant and abutment together
• Benefit - potentially serve better intraorally
Benefit potentially serve better intraorally.
• New, innovative technology of electron
Presentation Topics
p
• Electron beam melting (EBM) equipment
• Electron beam melting (EBM) equipment
• Trial fabrication of biomimetic, root-form
i
l
t
implants
• Mechanical properties
• Capability of the EBM process to produce
lattice or mesh structures
Filament Coils Coils Electron Focus coils Electron beam Gun Chamber Deflection coil Electron beam Powder Specimen Fabrication Rake Hopper •Powder Tooth implant Chamber Building Table
CT Tomography/CAD Model
(Powder)
Thin Powder Layer
M lti
Pre-Heating
New Powder Layer
(Powder)
Melting
New Powder Layer
(Powder)
(Repeating Process)
Sequence of manufacturing customized dental implant Preparation MRI or CT scanning for insertion Patient C t i d 3D Data Converting to CAD Customized Implant 3D Data Rapid f t i Customized Dental manufacturing Dental implant designing Electron Beam Melting (EBM)
Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V ELI
p
Specimens Made by EBM
D bb ll tt
• Dumbbell pattern
– Gauge length: 20 mm Diameter: 3 0 mm
– Diameter: 3.0 mm
• Ti-6AL-4V ELI powder (Arcam AB®)
A ti l i 40
– Average particle size: 40 μm
• Yield strength, tensile strength and elongation
1200 20 Yi ld S h
Mechanical properties
1000 16 18 Yield Strength Tensile Strength Elongation 600 800 h (MPa ) 10 12 14 ion ( % ) 400 600 St re n g th 6 8 10 E longat i 200 2 4 6Vickers Hardness
400 350 400 ) 250 300 d n e ss ( V H ) 150 200 c ke rs Ha rd 50 100 Vi c 0EBM cast wrought
Tensile Strength:
Polished vs Non Polished
Polished vs. Non-Polished
Microstructures
Microstructures
Ti6Al4V ELI cast
50 μm
•CP Ti picture
Ti6Al4V ELI cast
50 μm
•CP Ti picture
Ti6Al4V ELI EBM
CP Ti cast
Histopathological Results
p
g
Commercial implant
EBM implant Commercial implant
(SLA implant) 1 week
EBM implant 8 weeks
CT Scanning Center
Dentist A
Patient 1 Patient 1 Patient 1
Patient 3 Patient 2
Patient 2 Dentist B Dentist C
Patient 3 Patient 3 Patient 3
Center of Rapid Manufacturing of dental Implants Center of Rapid Manufacturing of dental Implants
Tooth A 1 Tooth B,1 Tooth B,2 Tooth B,3 Tooth A,1 Tooth A,2 Tooth A,3 ,
Summary
y
• The EBM process is capable of manufacturing a new design of dental implants:
– Made of one component – Mimics the patient’s tooth
Can have a lattice structure implemented on its – Can have a lattice structure implemented on its
surface
• Potential advantages:
– Reduce pre-insertion procedures – Faster healing time
Control stiffness and surface texture to promote – Control stiffness and surface texture to promote
Summary (cont.)
• Tensile testing shows
– Polished specimens have mechanical properties
bl t th f ht Ti 6Al 4V
comparable to those of wrought Ti-6Al-4V
– As-fabricated specimens have poor ductility and reduced strengthg
• Microstructural observation of specimens show
– Fine α- and β- microstructure (indicates fast cooling rate)
C l th ll l t th di ti f b ild
– Columnar growth parallel to the direction of build up • Challenges remaining
– Investigate fatigue behavior and corrosion resistanceInvestigate fatigue behavior and corrosion resistance – Find ways to improve surface characteristics
Acknowledgement
g
This project was partially supported by Army Research Grant No. W911NF-07-2-0056.