4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
Clinical Research Billing Basics
&
How to Develop a Coverage Analysis
Julie Colasacco & Michael C. Roach
Presented at
Virginia Commonwealth University
August 29, 2013
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
Goals
•
Raise Awareness
Important Terms & Acronyms
•
Clinical Research Billing – CRB
•
Medicare Clinical Trial Policy – CTP
•
Qualifying Clinical Trial – QCT
Overview
1.
Regulatory risks of clinical research billing non-compliance
2.
The importance of a Coverage Analysis (CA) for compliance
3.
An overview of Medicare rules for billing during clinical research studies
4.
The “basics” of billing for research team members
5.
How the budget structure influences what can be billed to insurance
6.
How the language of the Informed Consent Form influences what can be
billed to insurance
7.
What does Medicare mean by a “qualifying clinical trial”?
8.
What does Medicare mean by “routine costs”?
9.
The importance of the research coordinator in ensuring clinical research
billing is compliant
10.
Tips on protocol design for investigator-initiated studies to improve
budgeting and billing
11.
The role of the study calendar in clinical research billing
Overview
13.
Pause for Questions
14.
Introduction to the Coverage Analysis: Purposes
15.
Review of forms needed
16.
Development of a Coverage Analysis
•
Step 1: Draft a grid
•
Step 2: Review ICF
•
Step 3: Review CTA/Budget
•
Step 4: QCT Analysis
•
Step 5: Which are “routine costs”?
•
Step 6: How to document reasoning
•
Step 7: Coding the CA
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
1. Regulatory risks of clinical
research billing non-compliance
Risks Associated With Non-Compliance
•
CRB risks can be grouped:
1.
Billing for services that are already paid by the sponsor (double
billing)
2.
Billing for services promised free in the informed consent
3.
Billing for services that are for research-purposes only
4.
Billing for services that are part of a non-qualifying clinical trial
5.
Billing Medicare Advantage Plan when claim should be directed
Challenges
Cause of most research billing non-compliance:
•
Breakdown in coordination
Important information to coordinate
•
What research studies are being conducted at the facility?
•
Which patients are enrolled in a research study?
•
Which services should be charged to payors
and which charged to study account?
•
Sponsor, grant, internal account
•
Informed consent language
•
Clinical trial agreement language
•
Protocol Language
Coordination
•
Who impacts research billing?
•
Principal Investigator
•
Clinical Research Coordinator – vital communication coordinator
•
IRB process
•
Budget negotiators
•
Clinical Trial Agreement negotiators
•
Grant administration
•
Information Technology
•
Health Information Management
•
Registration/Scheduling
•
Medical center billing and coding
•
Physician professional fee billing and coding
•
Study fund managers
•
Managed care contract negotiators
•
….and others!
Current Research Regulatory
Environment
$0.0
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0
$6.0
$7.0
$8.0
Yale
Mayo Clinic
Rush University
Northwestern University
Tenet Healthcare (Norris Cancer Ctr)
Cases of improper clinical trials billing
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200 Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
2. The importance of a
Coverage Analysis (CA)
What is a Coverage Analysis?
•
Systematic review of research related documents to
determine the Medicare billing status of both the study
itself and the items and services provided to the
research subjects that are required by the study
•
A tool to coordinate information for purposes of:
•
Budgeting
•
Billing
What a Coverage Analysis is not
•
Guarantee of coverage in all cases
•
Substitute for the pre-authorization process
•
Based on individual investigators’ decisions or billing practices
•
Substitute for the practice of medicine or physician judgment
•
Treatment plan
Hypothetical CA: a way to coordinate information
Code
Infusion
1
Infusion
2
2 weeks
12 weeks 24 weeks Comment
Physical
Exam
99201-
99215
RC
RC
RC
RC
EKG
93000
RC
RC
RC
Drug 123
J0123
SB
SB
Infusion
96400
RC
RC
Urinalysis
81000
NB
NB
Ultrasound 93990
ICF
Patient
Diary
N/A
NB
NB
NB
NB
RC=Routine Care
SB=Sponsor Billed
ICF=Free in Informed Consent
NB=Not billable to Medicare
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
3. An overview of Medicare rules
for billing during clinical
True or False?
•
Medicare pays for standard of care during
research studies.
•
False: Medicare pays for
“routine costs” during
“qualifying clinical trials”
True or False?
“My friend in California says this service is covered
when she provides it, so it’s covered for us, too.”
Maybe:
Medicare Administrative Contractors (“MACs”) can
issue local coverage determinations (“LCDs”) that limit
coverage in their area
.
If your friend has a different MAC, you may not be able
to bill a service that she can.
Possible for your friend to have a different MAC even if
she works at a facility down the street from you
True or False?
“We have billed for this service hundreds of
times and the claim is always paid by Medicare,
so it must be covered.”
False: You cannot assume that just because
Medicare has been paying for a service that it
is a covered service
True or False?
“You are making clinical decisions when you
decide something is not billable to Medicare.”
False. Decisions about whether a service is
covered is not a clinical decision. It is a
decision based on an analysis of the billing
rules and coverage determinations made by
CMS and Medical Directors at MACs.
Medicare’s CRB Framework
Medicare requires a five-part process for clinical research services coverage:
1.
Does the study “qualify” for coverage?
2.
What items and services are “routine costs”?
3.
Do Medicare rules allow coverage of specific “routine costs” within a research
study?
4.
What is paid for by the sponsor?
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
4. The “basics” of billing
for research team
Billing Basics
•
Before getting into the details of CRB, it is
important to step back and understand:
•
The billing system in the U.S.
•
The structure of the Medicare Program
•
Medicare is a driver of reimbursement across
many payors, particularly for CRB
•
Understanding some of the basics helps with budgeting,
putting the CRB rules in context, and improves claims
management
Structure of Medicare reimbursement for
an outpatient service
Service
Technical
component
Professional
component
Medicare pays a technical component and professional component for
all Part B services. Who receives which component depends upon the
Service provided in a physician office setting
Service
Technical
component
Professional
component
Medicare pays
physician both
components in
one payment
Service provided in a hospital outpatient setting
Service
Technical
component
Professional
component
Medicare pays
hospital
Medicare pays
physician
The Legal Structure of Medicare
•
To understand Medicare research billing rules,
it is important to step back and understand the
legal structure of Medicare
•
Statutory basis for Medicare coverage follows
this principle:
•
Medicare covers items and services that are
“reasonable and necessary to diagnose or treat illness
or injury”
The Hierarchy of Medicare Rules
The Statute
National – CMS
•
National Coverage Determinations (“NCDs”)
•
www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/overview-and-quick-search.aspx
•
Manuals (e.g., Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Medicare Claims
Processing Manual)
Local - MACs
•
Local Coverage Determinations (“LCDs”)
•
Medical Director “articles”
•
Medical Director “rulings”
“Reasonable & Necessary Rule”
Medicare Contractors Have Wide Discretion
Example: CyberKnife
No national uniform policy; regional decision
“Geography Has Role in Medicare Cancer
Coverage,” NYT December 16, 2008
“[G]eography may play as big a role as medicine in determining which
men diagnosed with prostate cancer are eligible for CyberKnife. As it
turns out, Medicare pays for the treatments in 33 states — but not in 17
others.”
“Our guidance to them is that if there’s no evidence it works, they shouldn’t
pay for it,” said Dr. Steve Phurrough, Medicare’s coverage director in
Washington. “The CyberKnife is a good example of a technology where you
can review the evidence and come to different conclusions.”
Implications of hospital vs. physician
billing in CRB process
•
The “answer” in the CA will be the same for hospital billing
and physician billing – but how the charges are presented on
the claim forms will look very differently
•
Hospital billing and physician billing should usually match
during a research study – with respect to when services are
charged to the study account and when the item or service is
billed normally
•
Payment for hospital services versus physician services
varies immensely
•
Budgeting must take into account both the hospital charge
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
5. How the budget
structure influences what
can be billed to insurance
Medicare’s CRB Framework
Medicare requires a five-part process for clinical research services
coverage:
1.
Does the study “qualify” for coverage?
2.
What items and services are “routine costs”?
3.
Do Medicare rules allow coverage of specific “routine costs” within a
research study?
4.
What is paid for by the sponsor?
First things first:
What is a clinical trial agreement?
A clinical trial agreement (CTA) sets out the obligations of
parties involved in a research study
The CTA sets out:
what services are to be performed
“who does what”
“who owns what”
how much money will be paid for which services
“extra” regulatory obligations the parties will take on
the “rules of the road” between the parties
Why is the CTA important for the
research billing process?
•
Whatever is paid for by the sponsor in the CTA cannot
be billed to the subject or the subject’s insurer
•
If the CTA is not clear on what is being paid for by the
sponsor, the document may be misinterpreted both by
the sponsor and by regulators in the event of an audit
•
The information in the CTA on what the sponsor is
paying for must be communicated to the billing process
•
Institutions may suffer unintended consequences based
Non-industry contracts
•
The concepts in this presentation apply equally to contracts
for funding support with non-industry sponsors
•
Most CRB compliance risks can occur without respect to
whether the sponsor is industry, government, or a private
foundation
•
Negotiators of government contracts should coordinate with
the individuals who negotiate the budget and be cognizant of
their impact on the CRB process
•
Offices within organizations that deal with government
What and where is the “study
budget”?
•
The study budget for industry-sponsored studies is
typically an appendix or exhibit to the CTA and serves as
the compensation detail
•
The study budget and the main body of the contract are
part of the same document – they will be interpreted
together
Operational issues that could impact the
CRB process
Many clinical trial agreements have been
negotiated in “parts”
•
One person negotiates the main body
•
Another person negotiates the “budget”/compensation
•
Protocol is incorporated but may not be reviewed carefully by
either person, particularly if there is no formal MCA process in
place
Fundamental principle of Clinical Trial Agreements
– Singularity:
•
A CTA is one contract with many parts
•
Interpreted as a single legal document
Bringing a CRB perspective early to
a CTA
•
Best practice CRB processes analyze both the main body of the
CTA and the “study budget” exhibit from a billing perspective
•
Goal: Clarity in the final documents
•
If sponsor is paying for all services, then the CTA and study budget
should be clear and that should be reflected in a Medicare Coverage
Analysis (MCA) or other communication tool to inform the CRB process
•
If sponsor is only paying for some of the protocol services, then the
study budget should be clear as to which services are being paid for so
there is no confusion in developing the MCA
•
Ambiguities in the CTA and study budget will usually be interpreted by
Main body of the CTA:
Case studies of language
Examples of clauses (risky language):
•
“Payment for Study services are set out in Exhibit B. Such
compensation constitutes payment for all of the Institution’s costs for
conducting Study services.”
•
“Sponsor agrees to pay Institution in accordance with Exhibit B.
Institution agrees not to bill any third-party payer for services
required by the Study.”
•
“Exhibit A sets out the payment schedule to Institution for Study
services. Unscheduled imaging services shall be invoiced to
sponsor at $350 per service.”
Main body of the CTA:
Case studies of language
Examples of clauses (neutral language):
•
“
During the term of the Study, Sponsor agrees to provide financial support
for the Study in accordance with the budget set out in Exhibit A.”
•
“Payment to Institution for items provided and services performed by
Institution during the Study are set out in Exhibit A.”
•
Negotiations will not always be able to produce completely neutral language
in the main body of the CTA; if the main body contains discussion of
specifics of the financials, then be precise and ensure that the main body of
the CTA and the study budget language do not contradict each other
Structure of Financial Provisions:
Compensation Exhibit/“Study Budget”
There is no standard approach to the Compensation Exhibit – each
sponsor tends to have its own format
Some structures utilized:
•
Payments for “research service” at milestones
•
Note: Is “research service” defined? Be clear which services are
considered research services
•
Spreadsheet with payments based on schedule of events
Structure of Financial Provisions:
Compensation Exhibit/“Study Budget”
•
Consider adopting a consistent approach for the compensation
exhibits: the more detail on which services are being paid for, the
better
•
The MCA can serve as a tool for budgeting and lends itself to be
used as the compensation exhibit
•
Negotiating Suggestion: Watch out for footnotes! Avoid footnotes in
Operational issues that could impact the
CRB process
Many clinical trial agreements have been negotiated in
“parts”
•
One person negotiates the main body
•
Another person negotiates the “budget”/compensation
•
Protocol is incorporated but may not be reviewed carefully by
either person, particularly if there is no formal MCA process in
place
Fundamental principle of Clinical Trial Agreements –
Singularity:
•
A CTA is one contract with many parts
•
Interpreted as a single legal document
Tips on protocol design for
investigator-initiated
studies to improve
budgeting and billing
The design of the study impacts billing
3 Items to think about in protocols:
1. Loose use of the term “research”
•
If the service is being used for research purposed
and clinical care, then discuss the clinical care
•
When a protocol only talks about the research
aspects of a service, an auditor could ignore the
clinical usefulness of the services
The design of the study impacts billing
3 Items to think about in protocols:
2. Stating a potential benefit
•
If protocol or informed consent form states that the
subject will receive no benefit from the study, then no
services will be billable
•
Describe in the protocol and the informed consent
any potential benefit (though do not guarantee
©2013 Aegis Compliance & Ethics Center, LLP
The design of the study impacts billing
3 Items to think about in protocols:
3. What are the objectives in a Phase 1 study?
•
Is it necessary in the study to state principal and
secondary objectives of the study? Or can all
objectives be stated without rank?
•
Some Medicare Contractors and auditors have
denied coverage to Phase 1 studies when
measurement of therapeutic outcome is not a primary
objective or a clearly articulated objective
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
6. How the language of the
Informed Consent Form
influences what can be
billed to insurance
Medicare’s CRB Framework
Medicare requires a five-part process for clinical research
services coverage:
1.
Does the study “qualify” for coverage?
2.
What items and services are “routine costs”?
3.
Do Medicare rules allow coverage of specific “routine costs”
within a research study?
4.
What is paid for by the sponsor?
Role of the Informed Consent Form
Interpreting the ICF
•
ICF interpreted for MCA from the perspective of the subject
•
Plain meaning of the words used in the informed consent
•
Promises made to subject regarding what is free must be kept
•
If two sentences in Costs section could reasonably be
interpreted in a way that they contradict each other, then
re-word
Research Informed Consent:
Context
OHRP & FDA Rules:
45 CFR 46.116 & 21 CFR 50.20: “The information that is
given to the subject or the representative shall be in language
understandable to the subject or the representative.”
Goal: Language in 6
th
to 8
th
grade reading level
Government reviews and audits of ICF:
Interpreted from the perspective of the subject
The ICF means what it says: assumes plain meaning of the
ICF & Added Costs Section
Regulation:
45 CFR 46.116(b)(3) & 21 CFR 50.25(b)(3) require the ICF
include, when appropriate, “any additional costs to the subject
that may result from participation in the research”
If the “added costs” section of the informed consent form states that an
item or service will not be charged to the patient, then the provider
cannot bill for that service
Note: The regulation does not require that the ICF list the services that
are or are not charged, rather it requires the ICF to list the “additional
costs” the patient will incur as a result of participating in the study
(many routine costs are not costs resulting from participation)
Problematic Added Costs Language
“You or your insurer will have no costs for participating in this research
study.”
(Subject/insurer may not be billed for any protocol-required items or
services, nor for complications/injuries or other costs associated with
participation)
“Your routine medical care will be billed in the usual way. However, you
will not be charged for any study visits or services.”
(
Inconsistent terms within the same document)
“You will be responsible for the costs of any services you would have
received if you did not enroll in this research study. However, you will
not be billed for any lab services or imaging services.”
Added Costs Section Contemplating
the CRB Process
Language which keeps the ICF “neutral”:
“You will be responsible for the costs of services required by the research
study that are routine to treat your condition. You will not be responsible for
the costs of services that are required only because you are enrolled in the
research study.”
Language which specifically identifies services that will not be billed (if
IRB desires specifics)
“You will be responsible for costs for care you would have received if you
were not enrolled in this research. However, you will not be responsible for
the costs of the CT scan conducted at the start of each drug cycle.”
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
Medicare CRB Rules:
In a Nutshell
Medicare covers “routine costs” in a “qualifying
clinical trial” but note that all other Medicare
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
7. What does Medicare
mean by a “qualifying
“Qualifying” Status
Research study must meet CMS’ “qualifying clinical trial”
criteria for any items and services in the study to be
confidently covered.
•
Government and Drug Trials: CMS Clinical Trial Policy (NCD
310.1)
•
Device Studies: Device study coverage rules from regulations
and Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
•
42 CFR Part 405, Subpart B (42 CFR 405.201 et seq.)
•
Ch. 14 of the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
Qualifying Clinical Trials ("QCTs")
Part 1 – “Deemed Studies”
These studies are “deemed” to have 7 characteristics CMS wants
to see in a study it will cover
1.
Studies funded by NIH, CDC, AHRQ, CMS, DOD, and VA
2.
Studies supported by centers or cooperative groups funded by
NIH, CDC, AHRQ, CMS, DOD, and VA;
3.
Studies being conducted under an IND application; or
4.
IND exempt studies under 21 CFR 312.2(b)(1)
Qualifying Clinical Trials (“QCTs”)
Part 2 – “Necessary Requirements”
1.
The study must investigate an item or service that
Medicare pays for (falls in a benefit category)
2.
The study must enroll patients with diagnosed disease
Benefit Category Test
•
NCD 310.1 lists 72 benefit categories
Diseased Subjects Test
Medicare only covers items and services that are
reasonable and necessary to “diagnose or treat” illness or
injury (with limited exceptions)
•
Requirement comes from Medicare statutory principles
CA documents the subjects’ diagnosis
CTP: “Trials of diagnostic interventions may enroll healthy
patients in order to have a proper control group.”
Therapeutic Intent Test
For the time being, application of therapeutic intent criterion
is deferred to local Medicare Contractors
Principally an issue for Phase I drug studies
•
Can be vast differences from one Medicare
contractor to another
Therapeutic Intent
There are two discussions of therapeutic intent in the CTP:
•
“
The trial must not be designed exclusively to test
toxicity or disease pathophysiology. It must have
therapeutic intent.”
•
“The principal purpose of the trial is to test whether the
intervention potentially improves the participants'
Qualifying Clinical Trial Test - Recap
It is really a four part test:
•
Is the trial one of the “deemed” studies?
•
Does the trial assess something in a Medicare Benefit
Category?
•
Does the trial enroll people with diagnosed disease?
•
Does the trial have therapeutic intent?
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200 Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
“Qualifying”/Approved
Device Trials
Device Trials
Always check with your Medicare
Administrative Contractor is Palmetto for
the Richmond Virginia area for their
Category A Experimental Devices
Generally not covered
•
However, Medicare may cover routine costs, if the
device is used for a life-threatening condition.
•
Medicare contractor decides
Category B Non-Experimental Devices
These devices can be covered under Medicare.
•
FDA approved IDE study protocols restrict
investigational devices shipment to a limited number of
clinical sites for testing on a specific number of patients.
•
Medicare coverage is based on the device continuing to
Clinical Trials Billing
Medicare may cover procedures using devices with an IDE
that have been categorized as non-experimental
/investigational (Category B)
Medicare only covers those procedures if:
•
They involve a device the FDA has determined is
non-experimental/investigational (Category B), and
•
The device is furnished in accordance with
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
8. What does Medicare
mean by “routine
“Routine Costs” from the Medicare CTP
“Items or services that are typically provided absent a clinical trial (e.g.,
conventional care);
[Note: Not the same as “standard of care”]
“Items or services required solely for the provision of the investigational
item or service (e.g., administration of a noncovered chemotherapeutic
agent), the clinically appropriate monitoring of the effects of the item or
service, or the prevention of complications; and
“Items or services needed for reasonable and necessary care arising
from the provision of an investigational item or service--in particular, for
the diagnosis or treatment of complications.”
Routine Costs – Short Version
1.
Detection, prevention, or monitoring of complications;
2.
Administration of investigational item; or
Detecting, preventing, or monitoring
complications
Identify nexus between the item or service and a
known potential side effect of the item or service
•
What are the potential side effects of the drug?
•
What are the potential complications of use of the
Detecting, preventing, or monitoring
complications
Places in which CAs identify potential side effects
•
Protocol
•
Informed Consent
•
Product Label
•
Drug compendium discussion
•
AHFS-DI– American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information
•
NCCN – National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drugs & Biologics
Compendium
•
Thompson Micromedex DrugDex
Administration of Investigational Item
What is required to administer the investigational
item?
•
Surgery?
•
Infusion?
Note: must be something that would be covered
outside of study if similar therapy or procedure
occurs.
Conventional Care
CAs should identify objective practice
guidelines
1.
Professional association guidelines (e.g., National
Comprehensive Cancer Network/NCCN)
2.
Peer-reviewed literature
3.
Significant textbooks
4.
Disease-based associations
5.
NIH recommendations
Conventional Care: Example
NCCN Practice Guidelines for Cancer of the Oropharynx: follow-up
Physical exam –
Year 1: every 1-3 months
Year 2: every 2-4 months
Years 3-5: every 4-6 months
> 5 Years: every 6-12 months
Additional
Note: “All Other Medicare Rules
Apply”
Coverage is available if Medicare covers the
“routine cost” outside of clinical trial
MCA applies normal Medicare rules on top of any
item or service identified as a “routine cost”
Other Medicare Rules
Example: Rule against coverage of
self-administered drugs (Medicare Benefits Policy
Manual, Ch. 15, Sec. 50.5)
•
Exception examples:
•
anti-emetics;
Routine Costs vs. Standard of Care
Just because the physician normally performs a service at
a given frequency for similar patients not on trial does not
mean the service qualifies as a routine cost
E.g., PSA exams for prostate cancer patients
•
Study calls for monthly PSA
•
Physician typically does monthly PSA and argues they are
therefore “conventional care” and consequently “routine costs”
•
NCCN guidelines call for every 3 months
•
No other objective evidence produced by physician to support
Routine Costs vs. Standard of Care
EKG performed 3 days after each infusion of
cardio-toxic drug during trial
•
Routine cost: detecting and monitoring known
side effects
Also performed at annual follow-up visits for life
Is EKG at follow-up a routine cost?
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
9. The importance of the
research coordinator in
ensuring clinical
research billing is
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
10. Tips on protocol
design for
investigator-initiated studies to
improve budgeting and
billing
The design of the study impacts billing
3 Items to think about in protocols:
1. Loose use of the term “research”
•
If the service is being used for research purposed
and clinical care, then discuss the clinical care
•
When a protocol only talks about the research
aspects of a service, an auditor could ignore the
clinical usefulness of the services
The design of the study impacts billing
3 Items to think about in protocols:
2. Stating a potential benefit
•
If protocol or informed consent form states that the
subject will receive no benefit from the study, then no
services will be billable
•
Describe in the protocol and the informed consent
any potential benefit (though do not guarantee
©2013 Aegis Compliance & Ethics Center, LLP
The design of the study impacts billing
3 Items to think about in protocols:
3. What are the objectives in a Phase 1 study?
•
Is it necessary in the study to state principal and
secondary objectives of the study? Or can all
objectives be stated without rank?
•
Some Medicare Contractors and auditors have
denied coverage to Phase 1 studies when
measurement of therapeutic outcome is not a primary
objective or a clearly articulated objective
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
11. The role of the study
calendar in clinical
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
Study Calendars
•
Study calendars help orient
reviewers to where the subject is in
the study
•
The study calendar helps to sync
the schedule of events with the CA
•
Example: A charge for a CBC on
Hypothetical CA
Code
Baseline
C1 W1
C1W2
C1W3
C1W4
C2W1
C2W2
Physical
Exam
99214
S
P
P
S
P
P
CMP
S
P
P
S
P
P
CBC
S
P
P
S
P
P
Blood
Draw
S
P
P
S
P
P
DEXA
scan
S
P
Study
Drug
S
S
S
S
Admini
stration
P
P
P
P
Collecting Protocol Event Dates
John
Smith
ICF:
8/14/12
Code
Baseline
C1 W1
C1W2
C1W3
C1W4
C2W1
C2W2
Physical
Exam
8/16/12
9/2/12
9/9/12
9/16/12
10/6/12
10/13/12
CMP
8/16/12
9/1/12
9/9/12
9/16/12
10/6/12
10/13/12
CBC
8/16/12
9/1/12
9/9/12
9/16/12
10/6/12
10/13/12
Blood
Draw
8/16/12
9/1/12
9/9/12
9/16/12
10/6/12
10/13/12
DEXA
scan
8/18/12
9/21/12
Study
Drug
9/2/12
9/9/12
10/6/12
10/13/12
Admini
stration
9/2/12
9/9/12
10/6/12
10/13/12
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
12. Improving
communications during
the research study
Reality…
•
This isn’t going to happen overnight
•
Try piloting ideas for CRB claims management
•
Do not be afraid to re-think plan after results of piloting
•
Personal Observation: We have yet to see a CRB
The importance of databases
•
Sharing information and communication is a
critical feature of managing clinical research
billing
•
Databases and an information platform are
The importance of databases
What information to collect?
•
Study identification
•
IRB status
•
Subject enrollment
•
Study calendars
•
Coverage Analyses
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200 Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
Workshop Discussion
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200 Chicago, IL 60613
14. Introduction to the
Coverage Analysis:
Purposes
Screening
C1W1
C1W2
C1W3
C1W4
C2
W1
C2
W2
C2
W3
C2
W4
After
Discontinuation
Phys
Exam
99201-99215
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ECG
93000
X
X
Echo
cardiogram
93000-93014
X
X
X
Chest
CT or MRI
71250-71270,
71550-71552
X
X
X
Abdominal CT
or MRI
74150-74170,
74181-74183
X
X
Pelvis CT or
MRI
72192-72194,
72195-72197
X
X
Bone Scan
78300-78306
X
X
CBC w/diff
85025
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ComprehensiveMetabolic
Panel
80053
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Study Drug
J9999
X
X
X
X
Screening
C1W1
C1W2
C1W3
C1W4
C2
W1
C2
W2
C2
W3
C2
W4
After
Discontinuation
Phys
Exam
99201-99215
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
NB
ECG
93000
P
NB
Echo
cardiogram
93000-93014
P
S
NB
Chest
CT or MRI
71250-71270,
71550-71552
P
P
NB
Abdominal CT
or MRI
74150-74170,
74181-74183
P
NB
Pelvis CT or
MRI
72192-72194,
72195-72197
P
NB
Bone Scan
78300-78306
P
NB
CBC w/diff
85025
P
P
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
NB
ComprehensiveMetabolic
Panel
80053
P
P
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
NB
Study Drug
J9999
S
S
P
S
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200 Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
15. Review of forms
needed
First Question
Basic Documents Needed
•
Protocol
•
CTA/Budget – Funding Document
•
Informed Consent Form
•
IND Status – drug study
General Order of Steps for Developing an CA:
Proposed Study :
1. Develop grid
2. Perform QCT analysis
3. Identify items and services “hard-wired” free into protocol
4. Determine items and services that are routine costs
5. Determine if routine costs are covered by Medicare
6. Check proposed contract to determine if offered budget covers items and
services that are not billable
7. Negotiate contract/budget
8.
Finalize “added costs” section of informed consent
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194
Sections 16
Development of a Coverage Analysis
Step 1: Draft a grid
Step 2: Review ICF
Step 3: Review CTA/Budget
Step 4: QCT Analysis
Step 5: Which are “routine costs”?
Step 6: Document reasoning
General Order of Steps for Developing an
CA: Active Study
1.
Develop grid
2.
What items and services are promised free in the informed consent?
3.
What items and services are paid for by the sponsor?
4.
Qualifying clinical trial (QCT) analysis
5.
Determine items and services that are routine costs
6.
Determine if routine costs are covered by Medicare
7.
Apply Medicare rules to the routine costs
Document the QCT Analysis Process
Question
Yes
No
Comment
Deemed study?
Item or service falls
within a benefit
category?
Enrolls subject with
diagnosed disease?
Study designed with
therapeutic intent?
Qualifying Clinical
Trial?
Document the QCT Analysis Process
Question
Yes
No
Comment
Deemed study?
X
IND # 55,512
Item or service falls
within a benefit
category?
X
Drugs & Biologicals
Enrolls subject with
diagnosed disease?
X
Crohn’s Disease – Include direct quote
from protocol and reference page
number
Study designed with
therapeutic intent?
X
“To determine the efficacy of [study
drug] in minimizing occurrences of
abdominal pain over 24 week period.”
Qualifying Clinical
Recall: Device Trial Qualifying
Status
Device Trial Coverage: Coverage deferred to Medicare Contractor approval or
local rules
Category A IDE: covered when studying a life-threatening condition
Category B IDE: generally covered
PMA: generally covered with approval and may not always need approval
Note: Carotid Artery Stent PMAs must be approved by the Medicare Contractor
Misc Situations:
Labeled Use: generally covered because the study is likely not
“investigating” the device, but collecting outcomes data
Document Device Trial Qualifying
Question
If the device has an IDE what
category is it?
Comments
Does the device
have an IDE?
Yes
Category A
Category B
No
Question
If the device is FDA approved is it
being studies on-label or
off-label?
Comments
Is the device
approved by the
FDA?
Yes
On-Label
Off-Label
No
Coverage Eligibility Summary
Question
Yes No Supporting Explanation
Is the study
eligible for
coverage?
“Routine Cost”
Short version approach to “routine costs” used in MCAs:
1.
Detection or prevention of complications
2.
Conventional care
3.
Administration of investigational item
If study documents are not clear: will each subject enrolled
in the study need the item or service for the patient’s
clinical management?
Which of the events are justified for billing under
the coverage rules as “routine costs”?
Code
Infusion 1
Infusion 2
2 weeks
12 weeks
24 weeks
Physical
Exam
99201-
99215
RC
RC
RC
RC
EKG
93000
RC
RC
RC
Drug 123
J9999
SB
SB
Infusion
96400
RC
RC
Urinalysis
81000
NB
NB
Ultrasound
93990
ICF
Patient Diary
N/A
NB
NB
NB
NB
RC=Routine Care
SB=Sponsor Billed
ICF=Free in Informed Consent
NB=Not billable to Medicare
Document Reasoning
EKG: “The EKG in this study is conventional
care. Practice Guidelines for treatment of XYZ
Condition recommend EKG at this frequency.
[Cite Guidelines].”
Document Reasoning
EKG: “The EKG in this study is to detect
complications. The study drug has known
cardiotoxic effects. Protocol, p. 65.”
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613
Research Coding
Principal matters:
•
V70.7 diagnosis code
•
Q0/Q1 modifiers
•
Condition Code 30 (research setting)
Where to find the rules
Medicare Claims Processing Manual
Chapter 32, Section 69.6
“Requirements for Billing Routine Costs in Clinical
Trials”
Note: references to these research coding rules
are scattered throughout Medicare rules and
commentary, but the Claims Processing Manual
ClinicalTrials.gov number
When a study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (a
website managed by the NIH), it is assigned an 8
digit number
Providers may report the clinicaltrials.gov number on
the claim form, but this is strictly voluntary today.
New guidelines go into effect January 1, 2014
CMS conducts monthly aggregations of claims using
the clinicaltrials.gov code
V70.7
“Examination of participant in clinical trial.”
Used as the secondary diagnosis for all claims with
research-related items and services.
Note: If used as the primary diagnosis, then the claim
will be rejected.
Used for inpatient and hospital outpatient claims and
physician billing.
Q0/Q1
Modifiers placed after CPT code on:
Hospital outpatient claims
Physician billing claims
Not used in inpatient hospital claims
Not used for services on claims which are not
related to the research study
Q0/Q1
Q0 – “Investigational clinical service provided in a
clinical research study that is in an approved clinical
research study.”
Q1 - “Routine clinical service provided in a clinical
research study that is in an approved clinical
Q0
“Investigational clinical services are defined as those items
and services that are being investigated as an objective
within the study. Investigational clinical services may
include items or services that are approved, unapproved, or
otherwise covered (or not covered) under Medicare.”
Examples:
•
Study drugs that are billable
•
Category B devices
•
Investigational devices with Medicare approval
•
Laboratory tests which are identified in the objectives as
Q1
“Routine clinical services are defined as those items and services that
are covered for Medicare beneficiaries outside of the clinical research
study; are used for the direct patient management within the study;
and, do not meet the definition of investigational clinical services.
Routine clinical services may include items or services required solely
for the provision of the investigational clinical services (e.g.,
administration of a chemotherapeutic agent); clinically appropriate
monitoring, whether or not required by the investigational clinical
service (e.g., blood tests to measure tumor markers); and items or
services required for the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of research
related adverse events (e.g., blood levels of various parameters to
Condition Code 30
•
Used on the claim form whenever a V70.7 is
used
A note on the medical record
Section 69.3 of Ch. 32 also contains the following:
“The billing provider must include in the beneficiary's
medical record the following information:
trial name,
sponsor, and
sponsor-assigned protocol number.
This information does not need to be submitted with
the claim but must be provided if requested for
Add-on that applies to all:
Identifying treatment of complications
Note that in some studies, the sponsor will pay for unscheduled events
and treatment of complications.
A system needs to be devised to identify these
Suggestion:
•
Flag studies in database which pay for treatment of complications
or unscheduled events
•
Batch ED census and bump against subject database for the
flagged studies
•
Hold charges for any matched
Useful for
Effective CRB Claims Management
Database of research studies
Database of research subjects
CAs/tool
4147 N Ravenswood Ave Ste. 200
Chicago, IL 60613 888.739.8194