• No results found

US Strategy Weekly Volatility

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "US Strategy Weekly Volatility"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Gail M. Dudack, CMT ● Chief Investment Strategist ● [email protected] ● 212-320-2045 July 21, 2021

For important disclosures and analyst certification please refer to the last page of this report.

DJIA: 34511.99 SPX: 4323.06 NASDAQ: 14498.88

US Strategy Weekly

Volatility

The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 549.95 points, or 1.62% on Tuesday after falling 725.81 points, or 2.1%, on Monday. This surge in volatility drove the VIX index (VIX - $19.73) over 25 earlier this week which was a concern to many investors, perhaps because many call the VIX the “fear index.” We are not surprised if the level of fear is increasing among investors given the spread of the Delta virus, the rich level of equity valuations and the potential of a change in monetary policy. However, the VIX is not a good short-term indicator in our opinion.

It is actually most useful at the end of a bear market when fear is at its highest. VIX readings between 45 and 85 have marked recent bear market lows. This being true, a high VIX reading, particularly above 80, can denote a buying opportunity. See page 6. In comparison the recent readings of 25 are mild and are not a worry. Keep in mind that fear is emotional and often unpredictable, and this may be the message in the VIX’s rise – more volatility ahead. It has been our view that the second half of 2021 will be more volatile and is likely to include a correction of 10% or more.

In terms of technical indicators, we are more concerned about breadth data and specifically volume in advancing stocks. The last time the 25-day up/down volume oscillator showed strong and consistent buying pressure was when it recorded a single day in overbought territory on April 29. Prior to that there was a modest five consecutive trading days in overbought territory between February 4 and February 10. The February readings were a confirmation of the record highs made at that time. But since mid-February, there has not been any volume confirmation of recent highs. Currently, the 25-day up/down volume oscillator is at negative 2.19 after recording a negative 3.49 reading earlier this week. Monday’s drop to negative 3.49 was the first oversold reading since March-April 2020, or during the depths of the global pandemic.

In short, since early February, our 25-day up down volume oscillator has been showing us that as the indices were moving to new record highs, volume in advancing stocks was declining and volume in declining stocks was increasing. This is a sign of waning demand and/or investors selling into strength. The longer this non- confirmation of new highs continues, the greater the downside risk to the broader market. From this perspective, the recent selloff was expected and should be considered healthy.

Nevertheless, after any brief oversold reading, a bull market should rise to new highs and have an accompanying overbought reading. This demonstrates solid buying pressure. If not, and if a rally fails to generate a new overbought reading, it would be a signal that the major trend is weakening or changing. If a subsequent decline in the indices generates a second oversold reading without an intervening overbought reading, it would indicate that the major cycle has shifted from bullish to bearish. In sum, these are the scenarios that concern us. These are the patterns we will be monitoring in coming weeks.

In June, major inflation benchmarks were rising at hefty year-over-year rates: CPI 5.3%, PPI 9.4%, GDP deflator 2.0% (March), import prices index 11.2%, and import prices excluding petroleum 6.8%. And core benchmarks were CPI 4.5%, PPI 3.6%, and core PCE deflator 3.4%. In short, inflation is widespread, and as high, or higher, than it was in 2008 and it is not apt to end soon. This pressures current monetary policy.

Plus, easy monetary policy tends to fuel inflation and the real fed funds rate is already at an all-time low.

Most importantly, stock prices have not performed well during periods of high inflation. In fact, the chart on

page 3 shows that high inflation and stocks prices tend to be inversely correlated. Also noticeable in this

chart is that high inflation tends to precede recessions. All in all, it is not surprising that fear is rising.

(2)

, 2013 2 In June, major inflation benchmarks were rising at the following rates on a year-over-year basis: CPI 5.3%, PPI 9.4%, GDP deflator 2.0%

(March), import prices index 11.2%, and import prices excluding petroleum 6.8%. Core benchmarks rose as follows: CPI 4.5%, PPI 3.6%, and core PCE deflator 3.4%. In short, inflation is widespread, and as high, or higher, than it was in 2008.

-20%

-18%

-16%

-14%

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

22%

24%

Major Inflation Measures

Quarterly Data YOY%

CPI

Import Prices

Import Prices Ex Petroleum PPI - Finished Goods NSA GDP Price Deflator Index

Source: Dudack Research Group; Bureau of Economic Analysis; Bureau of Labor Statistics; quarterly data 4% Line

2% Line

-8%

-7%

-6%

-5%

-4%

-3%

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

11%

12%

13%

14%

15%

16%

17%

18%

19%

20%

Core Indices: CPI, PPI & PCE

Core CPI YOY%

Core PPI YOY%

Core PCE Deflator YOY%

Source: Dudack Research Group; Bureau of Labor Statistics

(3)

, 2013 3 Easy monetary policy tends to fuel inflation and the real fed funds rate is currently at an all-time low. More importantly, stock prices have not performed well during periods of high inflation. In fact, the bottom chart shows that high inflation and stocks prices tend to be inversely correlated. Note also that high inflation tends to precede recessions.

-7.0 -6.5 -6.0 -5.5 -5.0 -4.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Real Fed Funds Rate

Percent Fed Funds less PCE

Fed Funds less CPI Real PCE Average Real CPI Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Federal Reserve; Bureau of Labor Statistics; BEA

10 100 1000 10000

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

11%

12%

13%

14%

15%

Major Inflation Measures

Quarterly Data YOY%

CPI CPI Core GDP Deflator PCE Price Deflator SPX YOY%

Source: Dudack Research Group; Bureau of Economic Analysis; Bureau of Labor Statistics; quarterly data 4% Line

(4)

, 2013 4

Retail sales grew 0.6% in June, defying expectations that a drop in auto sales would push total sales down. The decline in auto dealer sales reduced top-line growth by 0.7% and excluding auto sales, retail sales rose 1.3%. Retail sales should expand in July after child credit checks are distributed to families.

$0

$25,000

$50,000

$75,000

$100,000

$125,000

$150,000

$175,000

$200,000

$225,000

$250,000

$275,000

$300,000

$325,000

$350,000

$375,000

$400,000

$425,000

$450,000

$475,000

$500,000

$525,000

$550,000

$575,000

$600,000

$625,000

$650,000

$675,000

Retail Sales YOY%

Seasonally Adjusted - $ Millions

Total Retail Sales

Retail Sales ex. Motor Vehicles & Parts Source: Dudack Research Group; US Census

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

Retail Sales YOY%

Seasonally Adjusted

Total Retail Sales SA (YOY%)

Retail Sales ex. Motor Vehicle & Parts SA (YOY%)

Source: Dudack Research Group; US Census

(5)

, 2013 5 The current IBES and S&P estimates are $192.51 and $189.83 for 2021, up $0.86 and $2.22, respectively. For 2022, the forecasts are $214.17 and $211.18, up $0.20, and $0.01, respectively. The 2021 increases indicate that there is good momentum at the beginning of second quarter earnings season.

$110.00

$115.00

$120.00

$125.00

$130.00

$135.00

$140.00

$145.00

$150.00

$155.00

$160.00

$165.00

$170.00

$175.00

$180.00

$185.00

$190.00

$195.00

$200.00

$205.00

$210.00

$215.00

$220.00

SP500 Operating Earnings Forecasts for 2021

Weekly Consensus Bottoms-Up Estimates

Refinitiv/IBES DRG Forecast S&P/Dow Jones Source: Dudack Research Group; S&P Dow Jones; Refinitiv

$110.00

$115.00

$120.00

$125.00

$130.00

$135.00

$140.00

$145.00

$150.00

$155.00

$160.00

$165.00

$170.00

$175.00

$180.00

$185.00

$190.00

$195.00

$200.00

$205.00

$210.00

$215.00

$220.00

SP500 Operating Earnings Forecasts for 2022

Weekly Consensus Bottoms-Up Estimates

Refinitiv/IBES DRG Forecast S&P/Dow Jones

Source: Dudack Research Group; S&P Dow Jones; Refinitiv

$95

$100

$105

$110

$115

$120

$125

$130

$135

$140

$145

$150

$155

$160

$165

$170

$175

$180

$185

$190

$195

$200

$205

$210

$215

$220

$225

Consensus Calendarized EPS Estimates

S&P Dow Jones and Refinitiv Bottoms-Up SP500 Consensus Operating Earnings

Source: Dudack Research Group; S&P Dow Jones; Refinitiv S&P/Dow Jones Estimates in Black

Refinitiv Estimates in Blue

2016

2017

2018 2019

2020 2021 2022

(6)

, 2013 6

Some investors were concerned about the rise in the VIX this week, perhaps because the VIX is a measure of volatility and volatility tends to rise in bear markets. Not surprisingly, many call the VIX the “fear index” which may help explain this week’s concern. We are not surprised that the level of fear is increasing given the spread of the Delta virus, high equity valuations and the potential of a monetary policy change. However, the VIX is most useful at the end of a bear market when fear is highest. In this regard, VIX readings between 45 and 85 have marked bear market lows. Recent readings of 25 are mild in comparison.

5 Year Chart

20 Year Chart

Source: Refinitiv

(7)

, 2013 7

The last time the 25-day up/down volume oscillator showed strong buying pressure was when it recorded a single day in overbought territory on April 29. Prior to that there was a minimal five consecutive trading days in overbought territory between February 4 and February 10. The February readings confirmed the record highs made in the broad indices at that time. But since then, there has not been any confirmation of recent highs. Currently, the 25-day up/down volume oscillator is negative 2.19 after recording a negative 3.49 reading earlier this week. Monday’s drop to negative 3.49 was the first oversold reading since March-April 2020, or during the pandemic.

This means that since early February, our 25-day up down volume oscillator has been showing that as the indices were moving to new record highs, volume in advancing stocks was declining and volume in declining stocks was increasing. This is a sign of waning demand and of investors selling into strength.

The longer this volume non-confirmation of new highs continues the greater the downside risk to the broader market.

In short, the recent selloff was expected and should be considered healthy. However, subsequent to an oversold reading, a bull market would rise to new highs and have an accompanying overbought reading. If not, and if a rally fails to generate a new overbought reading, it would be a signal that the major trend is weakening or shifting. If a future pullback generates an oversold reading without an intervening overbought reading, it would confirm that the major cycle has shifted from bullish to bearish.

-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 4200 4400 4600 4800

SPX and 25-Day Volume Oscillator

NYSE Volume (Bil) - right SPX - left

10-day average Volume (Bil) - right 25-day Up/Down Volume Oscillator - right

Oversold < -3.0

Overbought>3.0

Source: Dudack Research Group; Refinitiv

(8)

, 2013 8 The 10-day average of daily new highs hit 589 on May 10, a record high and beating the 10-day new high average of 526 on March 18 and the 489 record of January 22, 2000. Note: the 2000 advance peaked in March. The 10-day average of daily new highs was 195 this week. Daily new lows (64) are below 100 that defines a bear market, yet above the 10 or less that signals an extreme. The A/D line made a confirming record high on July 2, 2021.

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100 3300 3500 3700 3900 4100 4300 4500

SP500

Source: Dudack Research Group; Refinitiv

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240

NYSE Volume 10-Day MA

Tens of Millions Shares

Source: Dudack Research Group; Thomson Reuters

50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700 725 750 775

NYSE Cumulative Advance/Decline Line

with 200-Day Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Thomson Reuters

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

NYSE 52-Week New Highs and New Lows

10-Day Moving Average

New Highs New Lows Source: Dudack Research Group; Refinitiv

(9)

, 2013 9 AAII bullish sentiment for July 14 fell 4.0 points to 36.2% and bearishness rose 2.3 to 26.8%. This week the sentiment ratios were all at normal levels. The 8-week Bull/Bear spread is neutral for the eighth consecutive week. The ISE Sentiment index shifted from favorable to neutral on June 1, 2020.

-90%

-80%

-70%

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

110%

120%

130%

140%

150%

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 4200 4400 4600

4800

AAII Bull/Bear Spread

S&P Composite

Bull/Bears Spread (8-week Avg.)

Source: Dudack Research Group; American Association of Individual Investors;Refiniti v Negative

Positive

60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260

ISE Sentiment Index

All Securities: Call/Put Volume

4 Day Average 26 Day Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; International Securities Exchange; 26 day standard deviation lines Negative > 144

Positive < 88

(10)

, 2013 10

S

ECTOR

R

ELATIVE

P

ERFORMANCE

RELATIVE OVER

/

UNDER

/

PERFORMANCE TO

S&P 500

0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.62 0.64

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Technology* Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research; reconstituted as of September 29, 2018's close 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Staples Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research

0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.46

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Energy Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research

0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Financials Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research

0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Utilities Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average Bands

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research

0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Consumer Discretionary* Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research; reconstituted as of September 29, 2018's close

0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Healthcare Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research

0.050 0.055 0.060 0.065 0.070 0.075 0.080 0.085 0.090 0.095 0.100 0.105 0.110 0.115 0.120 0.125 0.130 0.135 0.140

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Communication Services* Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research; *replaced Telecommunications sector as of September 29, 2018

0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

REITS Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average Bands

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research

0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industrials Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research

0.105 0.110 0.115 0.120 0.125 0.130 0.135 0.140 0.145 0.150 0.155 0.160 0.165 0.170 0.175 0.180 0.185 0.190 0.195 0.200

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Material Sector relative to SPX

with 20-Week Moving Average

Source: Dudack Research Group; Intrinsic Research

SP500 Sector % Change

S&P REITS 24.8%

S&P ENERGY 24.2%

S&P FINANCIAL 19.0%

S&P COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 18.5%

S&P INFORMATION TECH 13.6%

S&P 500 13.4%

S&P INDUSTRIALS 12.5%

S&P HEALTH CARE 12.0%

S&P MATERIALS 9.3%

S&P CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY 9.0%

S&P CONSUMER STAPLES 5.1%

S&P UTILITIES 3.9%

Source: Dudack Research Group; Refinitiv; Monday closes 2021 Performance - Ranked

(11)

, 2013 11

G

LOBAL

M

ARKETS

- R

ANKED BY

2021 T

RADING

P

ERFORMANCE

Index/EFT Symbol Price 5-Day% 20-Day% QTD% YTD%

SPDR S&P Retail ETF XRT 94.59 -1.9% 3.0% -2.7% 47.1%

United States Oil Fund, LP USO 46.51 -9.1% -3.8% -6.8% 40.9% Outperformed SP500

Oil Future CLc1 67.42 -10.4% -5.9% -8.2% 39.0% Underperformed SP500

Energy Select Sector SPDR XLE 47.59 -9.1% -9.2% -11.7% 25.6%

SPDR Hom ebuilders ETF XHB 72.19 0.5% 2.9% -1.4% 25.2%

iShares US Real Es tate ETF IYR 106.27 1.6% 4.8% 4.2% 24.1%

Financial Select Sector SPDR XLF 35.98 -1.9% 2.1% -1.9% 22.0%

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF EWT 63.69 -1.2% 1.8% -0.4% 20.0%

iShares Rus s ell 2000 Value ETF IWN 157.51 -1.9% -2.8% -5.0% 19.6%

PowerShares Water Res ources Portfolio PHO 55.01 0.9% 6.4% 2.8% 18.4%

iShares MSCI Aus tria Capped ETF EWO 23.48 -1.8% -2.8% -2.0% 18.4%

iShares MSCI Canada ETF EWC 36.07 -2.9% -2.2% -3.2% 17.0%

iShares DJ US Oil Eqpt & Services ETF IEZ 13.07 -11.1% -13.6% -14.7% 16.3%

SPDR S&P Bank ETF KBE 48.53 -2.6% -2.8% -5.4% 16.0%

Indus trial Select Sector SPDR XLI 102.57 -0.1% 3.0% 0.2% 15.8%

Technology Select Sector SPDR XLK 150.43 -1.0% 5.9% 1.9% 15.7%

SP500 .SPX 4323.06 -1.1% 3.8% 0.6% 15.1%

iShares Rus s ell 1000 Value ETF IWD 157.13 -1.2% 1.8% -0.9% 14.9%

iShares Rus s ell 1000 ETF IWB 243.20 -0.9% 3.7% 0.5% 14.8%

iShares Rus s ell 1000 Growth ETF IWF 276.36 -0.7% 5.3% 1.8% 14.6%

NASDAQ 100 NDX 14728.21 -1.0% 4.8% 1.2% 14.3%

Health Care Select Sect SPDR XLV 128.82 0.0% 4.1% 2.3% 13.6%

SPDR DJIA ETF DIA 345.08 -1.1% 3.6% 0.0% 12.8%

DJIA .DJI 34511.99 -1.1% 3.7% 0.0% 12.8%

Nas daq Com pos ite Index Tracking Stock ONEQ.O 56.38 -1.2% 3.4% 0.1% 12.4%

Cons um er Dis cretionary Select Sector SPDR XLY 179.22 -1.3% 4.1% 0.4% 11.5%

iShares Rus s ell 2000 ETF IWM 218.30 -1.8% -1.7% -4.8% 11.3%

Materials Select Sector SPDR XLB 80.25 -2.7% -0.6% -2.5% 10.9%

iShares MSCI India ETF INDA.K 44.10 -0.2% 0.3% -0.3% 9.6%

iShares US Telecom m ETF IYZ 33.11 -0.8% 1.1% -0.3% 9.6%

iShares MSCI Mexico Capped ETF EWW 46.87 -0.2% 0.1% -2.3% 9.0%

iShares Nas daq Biotechnology ETF IBB.O 164.08 2.0% 3.3% 0.3% 8.3%

iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF EWU 31.61 -4.4% -2.4% -3.3% 7.9%

iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF EWH 26.45 -1.3% -1.0% -1.0% 7.3%

Gold Future GCc1 2098.10 0.2% 1.0% 0.6% 7.0%

iShares MSCI Singapore ETF EWS 22.83 -1.9% -0.4% -1.8% 6.3%

iShares MSCI Germ any ETF EWG 33.73 -3.2% -1.9% -2.5% 6.2%

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF EFA 77.46 -2.5% -1.3% -1.8% 6.2%

iShares MSCI Aus tralia ETF EWA 25.37 -2.2% -2.5% -2.3% 5.9%

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF VEU 61.80 -2.2% -2.4% -2.5% 5.9%

SPDR S&P Sem iconductor ETF XSD 179.84 -3.8% 0.3% -6.5% 5.3%

Shanghai Com pos ite .SSEC 3536.79 -0.8% 0.2% -1.4% 5.2%

Cons um er Staples Select Sector SPDR XLP 70.85 1.2% 3.0% 1.3% 5.0%

iShares MSCI South Korea Capped ETF EWY 89.94 -0.8% -1.3% -3.5% 4.5%

Utilities Select Sector SPDR XLU 65.50 1.8% 2.2% 3.6% 4.5%

iShares Rus s ell 2000 Growth ETF IWO 296.62 -1.9% -0.7% -4.8% 3.5%

iShares MSCI Brazil Capped ETF EWZ 38.17 -3.2% -4.9% -5.8% 3.0%

iShares MSCI Em erg Mkts ETF EEM 52.86 -1.5% -2.5% -4.2% 2.3%

SPDR Com m unication Services ETF XLC 56.15 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Silver Future SIc1 18.54 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

iShares MSCI Japan ETF EWJ 67.05 -2.0% -0.3% -0.7% -0.8%

iShares MSCI BRIC ETF BKF 51.81 -1.7% -3.3% -5.3% -0.8%

iShares iBoxx $ Inves t Grade Corp Bond LQD 135.75 1.1% 1.0% 1.0% -1.7%

iShares 20+ Year Treas Bond ETF TLT 150.00 3.3% 2.9% 3.9% -4.9%

SPDR Gold Trus t GLD 169.39 0.1% 2.7% 2.3% -5.0%

iShares Silver Trus t SLV 24.07 -4.0% -3.2% -4.4% -5.8%

iShares China Large Cap ETF FXI 43.59 -2.0% -4.3% -5.9% -6.1%

iShares MSCI Malays ia ETF EWM 24.83 -0.5% -5.7% -2.8% -13.8%

Source: Dudack Res earch Group; Thom s on Reuters Priced as of close July 20, 2021 Blue shading represents non-US and yellow shading represents commodities

(12)

, 2013 12

US Asset Allocation

Benchmark DRG % Recommendation

Equities 60% 70% Overweight

Treasury Bonds 30% 20% Underweight

Cash 10% 10% Neutral

100% 100%

Source: Dudack Research Group; raised equity and lowered cash 5% on November 9, 2016

DRG Earnings and Economic Forecasts

S&P 500 Price

S&P Reported

EPS

S&P Operating

EPS

DRG Operating EPS

Forecast

DRG EPS YOY %

Refinitiv Consensus Bottom-Up $

EPS**

Refinitiv Consensus Bottom-Up EPS

YOY%

S&P Op PE

Ratio S&P Divd Yield

GDP Annual

Rate

GDP Profits post-tax w/ IVA

& CC YOY %

2004 1211.92 $58.55 $67.68 $67.68 23.8% $67.10 20.9% 17.9X 1.8% 2.9% $977.30 20.3%

2005 1248.29 $69.93 $76.45 $76.45 13.0% $76.28 13.7% 16.3X 1.8% 3.8% $1,065.30 9.0%

2006 1418.30 $81.51 $87.72 $87.72 14.7% $88.18 15.6% 16.2X 1.8% 3.5% $1,173.10 10.1%

2007 1468.36 $66.18 $82.54 $82.54 -5.9% $85.12 -3.5% 17.8X 1.8% 2.9% $1,083.50 -7.6%

2008 903.25 $14.88 $49.51 $49.51 -40.0% $65.47 -23.1% 18.2X 2.5% 1.9% $976.00 -9.9%

2009 1115.10 $50.97 $56.86 $56.86 14.8% $60.80 -7.1% 19.6X 2.6% -0.1% $1,029.70 -9.8%

2010 1257.64 $77.35 $83.77 $83.77 47.3% $85.28 40.3% 15.0X 1.9% -2.5% $1,182.60 14.8%

2011 1257.60 $86.95 $96.44 $96.44 15.1% $97.82 14.7% 13.0X 2.0% 2.6% $1,456.20 23.1%

2012 1426.19 $86.51 $96.82 $96.82 0.4% $103.80 6.1% 14.7X 2.1% 1.6% $1,528.70 5.0%

2013 1848.36 $100.20 $107.30 $107.30 10.8% $109.68 5.7% 17.2X 2.0% 2.2% $1,662.50 8.8%

2014 2127.83 $102.31 $113.01 $113.01 5.3% $118.78 8.3% 18.8X 2.2% 1.8% $1,647.90 -0.9%

2015 2043.94 $86.53 $100.45 $100.45 -11.1% $118.20 -0.5% 20.3X 2.1% 2.5% $1,712.90 3.9%

2016 2238.83 $94.55 $106.26 $96.82 -3.6% $118.10 -0.1% 21.1X 1.9% 3.1% $1,664.90 -2.8%

2017 2673.61 $109.88 $124.51 $124.51 28.6% $132.00 11.8% 21.5X 1.8% 1.7% $1,633.90 -1.9%

2018 2506.85 $132.39 $151.60 $151.60 21.8% $161.93 22.7% 16.5X 1.9% 2.3% $1,686.50 3.2%

2019 3230.78 $139.47 $157.12 $157.12 3.6% $162.93 0.6% 20.6X 2.3% 2.2% $1,960.10 16.2%

2020 3756.07 $94.14 $122.38 $122.38 -22.1% $139.72 -14.2% 30.7X 1.9% -3.5% $1,951.80 -0.4%

2021E ~~~~~~~ $179.81 $189.83 $190.00 55.3% $192.51 37.8% 22.6X NA NA NA NA

2022E $198.50 $211.18 $211.00 11.1% $214.17 11.3% 20.5X NA NA NA NA

.

2015 1Q 2108.88 $21.81 $25.81 $25.81 -5.5% $28.60 1.5% 18.9 2.0% 3.2% $1,713.10 9.5%

2015 2Q 2166.05 $22.80 $26.14 $26.14 -10.9% $30.09 0.1% 20.0 2.0% 3.0% $1,683.70 -1.7%

2015 3Q 1920.03 $23.22 $25.44 $25.44 -14.1% $29.99 -0.2% 18.4 2.2% 1.3% $1,673.20 -6.7%

2015 4Q 2043.94 $18.70 $23.06 $23.06 -13.8% $29.52 -3.3% 20.3 2.1% 0.1% $1,589.70 -10.8%

2016 1Q 2059.74 $21.72 $23.97 $23.97 -7.1% $26.96 -5.7% 20.9 2.1% 2.0% $1,649.00 -3.7%

2016 2Q 2098.86 $23.28 $25.70 $25.70 -1.7% $29.61 -1.6% 21.4 2.1% 1.9% $1,624.30 -3.5%

2016 3Q 2168.27 $25.39 $28.69 $28.69 12.8% $31.21 4.1% 21.4 2.1% 2.2% $1,621.30 -3.1%

2016 4Q 2238.83 $24.16 $27.90 $27.90 21.0% $31.30 6.0% 21.1 2.0% 2.0% $1,641.00 3.2%

2017 1Q 2362.72 $27.46 $28.82 $28.82 20.2% $30.90 14.6% 21.3 2.0% 2.3% $1,672.50 1.4%

2017 2Q 2423.41 $27.01 $30.51 $30.51 18.7% $32.58 10.0% 20.9 1.9% 2.2% $1,693.90 4.3%

2017 3Q 2519.36 $28.45 $31.33 $31.33 9.2% $33.45 7.2% 21.2 1.9% 3.2% $1,683.70 3.8%

2017 4Q 2673.61 $26.96 $33.85 $33.85 21.3% $36.02 15.1% 21.5 1.8% 3.5% $1,696.00 3.4%

2018 1Q 2640.87 $33.02 $36.54 $36.54 26.8% $38.07 23.2% 20.0 1.9% 2.5% $1,844.70 10.3%

2018 2Q 2718.37 $34.05 $38.65 $38.65 26.7% $41.00 25.8% 19.4 1.9% 3.5% $1,833.80 8.3%

2018 3Q 2913.98 $36.36 $41.38 $41.38 32.1% $42.66 27.5% 19.4 1.8% 2.9% $1,873.90 11.3%

2018 4Q 2506.85 $28.96 $35.03 $35.03 3.5% $41.18 14.3% 16.5 2.1% 1.1% $1,867.10 10.1%

2019 1Q 2834.40 $35.02 $37.99 $37.99 4.0% $39.15 2.8% 18.5 1.9% 3.1% $1,791.40 -2.9%

2019 2Q 2941.76 $34.93 $40.14 $40.14 3.9% $41.31 0.8% 19.0 1.9% 2.0% $1,857.50 1.3%

2019 3Q 2976.74 $33.99 $39.81 $39.81 -3.8% $42.14 -1.2% 19.5 1.9% 2.6% $1,963.40 4.8%

2019 4Q 3230.78 $35.53 $39.18 $39.18 11.8% $41.98 1.9% 20.6 1.8% 2.4% $1,998.90 7.1%

2020 1Q 2584.59 $11.88 $19.50 $19.50 -48.7% $33.13 -15.4% 18.6 2.3% -5.0% $1,779.50 -0.7%

2020 2Q 3100.29 $17.83 $26.79 $26.79 -33.3% $27.98 -32.3% 24.7 1.9% -31.4% $1,589.40 -14.4%

2020 3Q 3363.00 $32.98 $37.90 $37.90 -4.8% $38.69 -8.2% 27.3 1.7% 33.4% $2,018.50 2.8%

2020 4Q 3756.07 $31.45 $38.19 $38.19 -2.5% $42.58 1.4% 30.7 1.6% 4.3% $1,951.40 -2.4%

2021 1Q 3972.89 $45.95 $47.41 $47.62 144.2% $49.13 48.3% 26.4 1.6% 6.4% $1,983.80 11.5%

2021 2QE 4297.50 $43.35 $46.08 $44.00 64.2% $46.44 66.0% 25.3 NA NA NA NA

2021 3QE* 4323.06 $44.27 $47.06 $48.25 27.3% $47.80 23.5% 24.2 NA NA NA NA

2021 4QE $46.24 $49.28 $50.13 31.3% $49.99 17.4% 22.8 NA NA NA NA

2022 1QE $46.87 $50.04 $52.86 11.0% $50.54 2.9% 22.5 NA NA NA NA

2022 2QE $48.23 $51.20 $48.94 11.2% $51.74 11.4% 21.9 NA NA NA NA

2022 3QE $50.61 $53.89 $53.56 11.0% $54.57 14.2% 21.1 NA NA NA NA

2022 4QE $52.78 $56.05 $55.64 11.0% $57.02 14.1% 20.5 NA NA NA NA

Source: Dudack Research Group; S&P Dow Jones; Refinitiv Consensus estimates; **Refinitiv quarters may not sum to CY *7/20/2021

(13)

, 2013 13

Regulation AC Analyst Certification

I, Gail Dudack, hereby certify that all the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views about the subject company or companies and its or their securities. I also certify that no part of my compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly related to the specific views contained in this report.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

RATINGS DEFINITIONS:

Sectors/Industries:

“Overweight”: Overweight relative to S&P Index weighting

“Neutral”: Neutral relative to S&P Index weighting

“Underweight”: Underweight relative to S&P Index weighting

Other Disclosures

This report has been written without regard for the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient, and should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment. The report is published solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. The securities described herein may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. The report is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as being accurate, nor is it a complete statement or summary of the securities, markets or developments referred to in the report. Any opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice and Dudack Research Group division of Wellington Shields & Co. LLC. (DRG/Wellington) is under no obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. Options, derivative products, and futures are not suitable for all investors, and trading in these instruments is considered risky. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, and yield from securities, if any, may fluctuate as a security’s price or value changes. Accordingly, an investor may receive back less than originally invested. Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or income of any security or related instrument mentioned in this report.

DRG/Wellington relies on information barriers, such as “Chinese Walls,” to control the flow of information from one or more areas of DRG/Wellington into other areas, units, divisions, groups, or affiliates. DRG/Wellington accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of all or any part of this report.

The content of this report is aimed solely at institutional investors and investment professionals. To the extent communicated in the U.K., this report is intended for distribution only to (and is directed only at) investment professionals and high net worth companies and other businesses of the type set out in Articles 19 and 49 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2001. This report is not directed at any other U.K. persons and should not be acted upon by any other U.K. person. Moreover, the content of this report has not been approved by an authorized person in accordance with the rules of the U.K. Financial Services Authority, approval of which is required (unless an exemption applies) by Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Additional information will be made available upon request.

©2021. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or distributed in any manner without the written permission of Dudack Research Group division of Wellington Shields & Co. LLC. The Company specifically prohibits the re-distribution of this report, via the internet or otherwise, and accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect.

Dudack Research Group a division of Wellington Shields & Co. LLC.

Main Office:

Wellington Shields & Co. LLC 140 Broadway

New York, NY 10005 212-320-3511

Research Sales: 212-320-2046 Florida office:

549 Lake Road

Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082 212-320-2045

Prices as of the close of July 20, 2021

References

Related documents

The Institution of Honorary Supervisors in the System of Public Education of the Russian Empire in the First Half of the 19th Century (The Case of the Kharkov Educational

The influence of the native Kalmyk language level in high school students on the development of creative musical abilities was studied based on the

We have identified the dependence of the level of development of methodological reflection on the level of development of skills to solve the TLI at the end of

This indicates that high school students are more sensitive (5.5 times) to the positive impact of family education strategies in the development of self-regulation

No significant difference was found in terms of gender for those styles except avoidant decion making styles and visual learning modalitiy both for parametric and

11,3 % of respondents experienced negative emotions when contemplating creative visual works with national characteristics, explaining the oversaturation of the perception

Fifth, testing of the invariant of the EVC model of the content of primary foreign-language education, namely, the data of Tables 2–7 and the diagram in Figure 1 show

(2) there have not been created conditions in the higher education system of Russia for the implementation of students’ academic rights in accordance with the principles and