PLANT
Vol.
38No.
5PHlYSIOLOGY
September
1963
Analytical Study
of
Umbelliferone
and
Scopoletin
Synthesis
in
Sweet Potato Roots Infected
by Ceratocystis fimbriata
T.
Minamikawa
3,T. Akazawa
3,and I. Uritani
Laboratory of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Anjo, Aichi, Japan
Introduction
It has been reported by several workers (3, 4,5,
6, 8) that coumarins are produced in plant tissues in response to pathogenic infection and it has been hypothesized that they are concerned with disease resistance. In
1953,
Uritani and Hoshiya (9) re-ported that sweet potato roots infected by the black rot fungus,CeratocYstis
fimlbriata,
producedumbelli-ferone (7-hydroxv coumarin) and scopoletin
(6-methoxy-7-hydroxycoumarin) along with some other phenolic substances such as chlorogenic,
isochloro-genic,
and caffeic acids (10). They felt that the 2 coumarin compounds may act in the prevention of fungus penetration into the host tissue. The tvpical metabolic change in black-rotted sweet potato root is the production of polyphenols, such as chlorogenicacid, in the healthy tissue adjacent to the infected tissue and of
furanoterpenoids,
such as ipomea-marone, in the infected tissue (2). A comparison of the patterns of synthesis of coumarin compounds with polyphenols and furanoterpenoids would appearto be worthwhile to better understand the nature of the host-parasite relationship. The biosynthesis of coumarin compounds is also of biochemical interest because the carbohydrate metabolism of the diseased host tissue might presumably be altered to form such aromatic compounds having a possible role in the host resistance.
Materials
and Methods
Fungus Inoculation and Preparation of
Samtple:
Sweet potato (Ipomea batatas) roots harvested at the Toyohashi Farm of the Aichi Agricultural Ex-periment Station in October, 1961, were stored at'Received Jan. 3, 1963.
2This paper constitutes Part 35 of the
phytopatho-logical chemistry of sweet potato with black rot. 3Present address: The International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, The Philippines.
100
until used. In most experiments. roots of Norin No. 1, a typical resistantvariety,
were used. Norin No. 10 and Norin No. 4, resistant and suscep-tible varieties respectively, wereemployed
forcom-parison. The basic procedures of the fungus inocu-lation of root tissues and the subsequent
handling
were as reported previously (2). Individual rootswere cut into 1.5 to 2.0 cm thick slices which were
inoculated with a spore suspension of C.
fimnbriata.
Uninoculated control slices of equal size fromcor-responding parts of the same r3ots were used. Both samples were then incubated at 280. At 24-hour intervals, diseased and control tissues were harvested
for the chemical analysis of the coumarin compounds. In the analysis of Norin No. 1, 10 discs
measuring
10 mm in diameter were first cut out with a corkborer; then 5 slices of 1.0 mm thickness were ob-tained from each disc with a hand
microtome, by
cutting from the surface to the innerportions
of the discs. In experiments using Norin No. 10 and No. 4, 3 layers (0.5 mm in thickness) were harvested fromthe surface of each disc.Corresponding layers
from 10 discs were combined and subjected toanaly-sis. The averaged fresh weight of the 10 layers
when combinedwas0.95 gfor Norin No. 1 and 0.48 g for Norin No. 10 and 4. The weights did not
fluc-tuate much throughout the experimental
perioxl
of4 to 9 days following fungus infection.
Analysis of
Coumlarins:
The plant samples werefirst homogenized with 5 ml of 95% methanol in a
Potter-Elvehjem glass homogenizer and then gently
boiled in a hot water bath for 30 minutes. After
cooling the mixture was filtered and concentrated in
a Rinco rotary flash evaporator. The concentrated
material was dissolved in a small volume of methanol
and was quantitatively applied to a thin layer silica gel chromatoplate
(6-8
cm X 15 cm), preparedac-cording tothe method of Kirchner et al. (7) as
modi-fied by Akazawa and Wada (1,2). The chromato-plate was developed in ethyl-acetate/n-hexane
(50:50
v/v) containing 2% acetic acid as solvent. Afterdlevelopnillent,
2 well seplarated nlajor fluorescentbands w-ere (letected un(ler a UN" lamnp and their RF values were comparable with those of pure
sam-ples of unmbelliferone an(d scopoletin. The fornier
-wvas (leel) blue (RF:0.63 ) andl the latter greenish blue (
R,.:
0.32 ). Eaclh zone w-as illarke(l b1 a pencil and scratche(d ith aslpatula
froni tIleplate,
elutedl by liot nIethanol, and the eluate was concen-trate(l in a rotary flasll evaporator. The blank zonescorresponl(linlg to the position of umlbelliferone and scopoletinl were treate(l in the sanlle ilanliler, an(Il the
resultilng eluates serve(l as coIltrols. The concen-trate(l miaterial was further purified by
paper
chro-matography. Toyo-filter paper No. 51 was used Nitil 5 ajacetic aci(l as solxent. TheRF
values ofunilbelliferoile and
scopoletin
(letected 1w UIV lampwere 0.57 aildl 0.44, respectively. Each fluorescent zone was cut out an(d extracte(l (luantitatively witll a nlixture of 0.2Mr
sodiumii
carbhonate (pH 10.0) andetallanol (1: 1 v/v). Under these con(litions the
fluorescenice w-as perfectly stable for at least 24
liours. Siilce the UV
spectra
of the eluates thusobtaine(i xwere found to be practically identical with
those of the pure sanmples ofuillbelliferone and
scopo-letini tile quantitative
estimiiation
of unibelliferoneainli
scopoletin
was carl-ie(l out)vy ineasuring
thefluorescelnce intensitv of an
alppropriatel
(lilute(I eluate by a Sliilla(lzu fluorometereqiuipl)e(l
with filterFl-P,.
Quinine sulfate (10.0uAg/nml
of 0.1 NH.SO4) was used as a stan(lard fluorescent
sub-stance. The fluorescence intensity of the control
sanllIple
was practically negligible (about 0.9 %). Calibration curlVesxvere nmadewith pureulllbelliferone aIndscopoletinl
under alkaline con(litions aindw\ere
use(i for the calculation of theamnount
of eacilconm-pound in the tissue extracts. The recovery of these coumarins was deternline(l as follows: a known anmount of each pure
comipound
wvas
added to slices ofthe noniIlfected fresh root tissue andl the couillarinsxvere extracted and analyze(l for ill exactly the sanme imlanner as dlescribeci albove. Recoveries froml such a proceclure proved to be satisfactory. as slilowIl in
table 1.
Breakdo7un of
Couio(irin(
C)oinpounds by the Fuin-guts: A spore suspensionl of C. fimitbriatta xvas addedto 50 l1 of culture me(lia [potato extract (250 g/liter
x-ater- ) colltaining 2 d(, sucrose an(l 0.4C, casein
Table I
Recoveries of
Unmbellifernce
antd ScopoletiniThe values represent the average of duplicate analyses.
Experinleilt Compound added 1 Umbelliferone Scopoletin 2 Umbelliferone Scopoletin
hydrolx
sate] (11) in a Sakaguchi-flask,andl
thecul-ture
wtas
shaken for 2days
at 280. A flaskwxhiclh
ha(l not been inoculate(d w%ith the fungus served ascontrol. After 2
days
10 mg each ofumlbelliferone
an(dscopoletin (lissolvedl
in 5 ml of 10'/%
ethalnol
were aseptically addledl to all the flasks. Five nml of 10 () etlianol were a(l(le(l to another culture flask sillmultaneously to (leterilline the effect of
ethalnol
on the fungal growtth. After shaking for another
4 days at
280,
thecontents of each flask werebrought
up to 100 nml wvith methanol. The mlycelia werere-nIovedl by filtrationi. An aliquot of the filtrate was.
quanltitatively
applied
to asilicca gel
cllronlatol)late
follow-ed by paper
chronlatograplly
for tileaiCalvXsis
of counllarin conmpoun(ds. Cultures were
carriedl
outin (luplicate.
Results
Ju,,,e Cour-se Alnalasis of (c01Jola-(ri11 .vnwtliesis: Tlle amllounts of botlh uillbelliferoile (fig 1) ani(l
sco-E E ,III IIV V C 3 6
TIME- DAYS AFTER FUNGUS INOCULATION
TIME- DAYS AFTER FUNGUS INOCULATION
FIG. 1. Time course of umbelliferone synthesis in Norin No. 1. (I) to (V) correspond to the layers (1
mm thick) starting from the inoculated surface to the Re- Re- innermost layer; e.g., (I) : outside layer of inoculated
covered covery sample, (II) : adjacent inner layer etc. (c): outside
Ag ,ug
c/
layer of uninoculated controlsample.
Arrow(t)
de-notes tissue samples infected by fungus more than half
3.02 2.50 82.9 anarea. (fig 1-A).
1.51 1.30 85.8 FIG. 2. Time course of scopoletin syntiesis in Norim
35.1 25.8 85.2 No. 1. (I), (II), (III), (IV), (V), and (c) the sanme as for figure 1.
poletin (fig 2) in the 5 layers (1 mm in thickness) from diseased and control tissues of Norin No. 1 were analyzed continually throughout the infection
period. The time course of synthesis in the outside layer (I in figs 1 and 2) is particularly noteworthy. The synthesis of umbelliferone started only 12 hours
after fungus inoculation and continued until the 4th
day. Afterwards, quite a sharp decline started which levelled off after the 6th day of infection. In thecase of scopoletin synthesis, there was a lagphase
of about 1 day, and then a steady increase was
ob-served. The maximum period of scopoletin forma-tion occurred on the 4th
day,
similar to that ofumbelliferone, and after this period, a decrease was observed. The reason for the unexpected increase
of the scopoletin after the 7th (lay was not clear (I in fig 2). In both cases a marked synthesis of the
conmpounds seenmed to parallel the progress of fungus penetration into the host tissue. The amount of umbelliferone in the outside layer on the 4th day was about twice the amount of scopoletin. The rate of umbelliferone synthesis in the inner tissue was less marked as compared to the outside layer. The 2nd and 3rd layers gave a somewhat similar pattern (II and III in fig 1). In these 2 layers, a
measur-able increase was not observed until the 4th
lay,
and
synthesis
reached maximum on the 6th to the3
7th day and levelled off afterwards. This fact may
indicate the inward movement of the site of umbelli-ferone synthesis in the diseased tissue after about the 4th day. The amount of umbelliferone in the next
inner layers (IV and V in fig 1) was very little,
though therewas also some increaseatthe end of the 9th day. The synthesis of scopoletin in the inner layers showed a pattern different from that of
um-belliferone; namely, it increased linearly until reach-ing its maximum, and the movement of the site of synthesis into the inner parts was also quite notice-able. The amount of scopoletin in the innermost region was small. The formation of the 2 coumarin compounds in the outside layer of the uninoculated control tissue was detected, but there was little
syn-thesized in comparison to that fornmed in the infected
root. Furthermore, in both the freshly cut and the inner parts of the control tissues, the formation was
negligible. Themaximum amount of the 2 coumarin compounds in the outside layer of the dliseased tissue was about 27-fold (umbelliferone) and 20-fold (sco-poletin) over that in the same region of the unin-fected control tissue.
Comiparative
Analysis
in Different Varieties:The synthesis of the two major coumarins was in-vestigated in Norin No. 10, resistant, and Norin No. 4, susceptible varieties, and the results are shown in
4
I 2 3 4
TIME-DAYS AFTER FUNGUS INOCULATION
TIME- DAYS AFTER FUNGUS INOCULATION
FIG. 3. Synthesis of umbelliferone in Norin No. 10 and No. 4. (I), (II), and (III) correspond to the layers
(0.5 mm thick) starting from the inoculated surface, respectively. (c) is the first layer of the uninoculated control. FIG. 4. Synthesis of scopoletin in Norin No. 10 and No. 4. (I), (II), (III), and (c): the same as for
figure 3.
figures 3 (umibelliferone) andcl 4 (scopoletin). The
synthesis of umlbelliferone in the outside layer of
Norin 10 was
surprisingly
high and continued rapid-lr without a lag phase until the 3rd to the 4th day. The pattern ofsynthesis
in the 2nd an(d 3rd layersseemle(d to be somiiewhat simliilar to that of the outside
layer
though the amountwas nmuch less. Inthe caseof Norin No. 4, synthesis continued until the 2nd
(lay, though the magnitu(le was evidently snmaller than that of Norin No. 10, and stopped abruptly after this perio(l. Apparently, movemiient of the site of the coumarin synthesis dloes not occur in this
variety. As in the varietv Norin No. 1, the
forma-tion of umlbelliferonie in the noninfected cut tissue
was slight in both Norim No. 10 andl Norin No. 4
throughout the incubationi period. Thus, it can be
calculate(d that about a 45-fold increase of
umbelli-ferone was induced in the outsidle
lay)er
of Norin No. 10 and about 14-fol(d increase in that of Norin 4 over that in the uninifecte(d contrel tissue (luring 4(lays infection perio(l. In the case of
scopoletin.
thesynthesis curve showed a steadlv increase until 1 to 2
days
after infection in both varieties, similar tothe results obtainedl in Norim No. 1. In Norin No. 10,a mlarkedl synthesis was observedl afterthis period,
whereas in Norim No. 4, the svrnthesis apparently
stoppe(l. The ratio of the
scopoletin
content in the outsi(le layer to that of noninfectedl control tissueoni the 4th (lay was about 27 in Normii No. 10, but only 3.5 in the case of No. 4.
Fuingal Breakdowin of
titbelliferotic
ani(dSco-polctini:
During the culture period of 2 (lays. thefungus grew vigorously aln(l the mle(lia becamle turbidl
with mycelia. After another 4 days of shaking the
licquid mie(lia becamiie dlensely black, irrespective of
the addition of counmariln conmpounds. Added
um-l)elliferone or scopoletin did not seem to retarci the
fungal growth at a concenitration of about 200 mg
per liter. The control
experiment
showedl
that thefungus
prodluced
neithel- umlbelliferone nor scopoletin in li(qui(d culture medlia and none of the fluorescentmlaterial was formle(l. It is striking that the fungus
legradle(d a imieasurable amiount of scopoletin and uim-belliferone as showrn in table II, an(d the imiagnitudle
of scopoletin breakdown was nmore renmarkalle tlhain
that of umbelliferone. It was shown that 90 % of
the added scopoletin was broken clown (luring the
same period. Interconversion of the 2 cDunmariln
compounds was not observed and the level of
cou-marins added to the media didl not (lecrease in the absence of the fungus.
Discussion
In our previous study (2) it has been established that, in addition to the formation of coumarin
com-poundls. large amnounts of polyphenols and
ipomea-marone are prodluced in sweet potato roots in response
to the black rot infection. Thus, 3 types of
com-pounds
aretypical
mletabolites
of this disease ofsweet potato. The present
stu(ly
indicates, however,that the synthesis of 2 major counmarin
compounds,
umbelliferone an(d scopoletin, occurs on a much smaller scale than that of other 2types
ofcompounds. Furthernmore, the bound( fornms of such coumarin com-poundls have been foun(d to be negligibly low (Mina-mikada. Akazawa, and Uritani, unpubl. data). Hence, froml thepathological
view point, it is rather hard to beliexve that these coumiairin conipoundlsmight have a
potent
antipathogenic function in the lisease(d sweet potato root.Syntlhesis of coumiiarin compounds, in particular that of umlbelliferone, occurs miiost
actively
in theout-si(le
layer
of the fungus-infected tissues, and thispicture is
very
nmuch similar to that of ipomeaiiiaronesynthesis. although there is a lag phase of abnut 1 (lay in the latter case (2). Furtlhernmore, it shoul l be notedl that there is an apparently close
parallel
between the amiount of post-infection coumiiarinpro-(luction and the (legree of host resistance against
the pathogen; a similar relationship was observed in the case of ipinmeamarone synthesis. Thus, the
pattern of synthesis of these coumarins after infec-tion seemiis to be (lifferent fromii that of polyphenolic
colilpounId(s, e.g. clhlor-ogenic aci(l. This was indee(l
verified wvhen the ratio of the amlounlt of chlorogenic acicd in the inner layer to that of the outer inoculate(d
laver w-asfound( to be very mutch higher than the
cor-Table II
Fitfl(Jal BrIrakdozwi of
l
1i1)CllifeioJlc (1)i(d ScopoeltilThe figures represenit total amount present in the media.
Compound added Umbelliferone Umbelliferone Scopoletin Scopoletin Inoculation + Added Umbelliferone mg 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 Found Scopoletin U,mbelliferone mg mg 11.1 11.4 8.0 8.5 .. 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 Scopoletin mg .. 11.4 11.8 0.9 1.2
responding ratios of ipomeamarone or either
cou-marins, indicating a different site for polyphenol
synthesis.
The liquid culture experiment showed a rather
marked breakdown of coumarincompounds. Though
this type of observation might not be
directly
relatedto the events occurring in the host-parasite complex.,
the breakdown of these compounds in the later stage
of infection may possibly be interpreted as due to
fungusaction. We cannot, of course,
deny
the possi-ble action of certain enzymes in the host tissue asbeing responsible for the coumarin destruction.
Summary
A chromatographic metho(d was developed for the quantitative estimation of umbelliferone and
scopoletin in sweet potato (Ipomlea batatas) root tissues infected by the black rot fungus, Ceratocystis fimbriata. In the variety Norin No. 1, a miarked synthesis of umbelliferone occurred 12 hours after
inoculation, whereas scopoletin synthesis started after
a lag phase of 1 day. The amount of umbelliferone
at its maximum stage was about twice as much as that of scopoletin. The formation of these couimiarin compounds was very low in the uninoculated cut tissues, and thus, counmarin synthesis is believ-ed to occur after infection.
The
synthesis
of the 2 coumiiarins wasconmpared
in 2 varieties, Norin No. 10, resistant andI NorimiNo. 4,
susceptible.
Coumarinsynthesis
was miore conspicuous in the resistant root variety ascom-pared to the less mnarked synthesis in the susceptible
one.
The black rot fungus was foundl to (legrade
uni-belliferone and scopoletin during
4-day
incubation period in liquid culture. Scopoletin was degradedmore easily (about 90%) than unmbelliferone (about 20 %). Neither transformations betweein these
cou-marins nor endogenous formation by the fungus alone was detected.
Literature
Cited
1. AKAZAWA, T. AND K. WADA. 1960. Quantitative estimation of ipomeamarone by chromatostrip technique. Agr. Biol. Chem. 25: 30-3.
2. AKAZAWA, T. AND K. WADA. 1961. Analytical
study of ipomeamarone and chlorogenic acid
alter-ations in sweet potato roots infected by Ceratocystis
fimbriata. Plant Physiol. 36: 139-44.
3. ANDREAE, W. A. 1948. The isolation of blue fluo-rescent compound scopoletin, from green mountain potato tubers, infected with leaf roll virus. Can. J. Res. 26C: 31-4.
4. BEST, R. J. 1944. Studies onl a fluorescent sub-stance present in plants. II. Isolation of the sub-stance in a pure state anid its identification as
6-methoxy-7-hydroxy 1: 2 benzopyrone. Aust. J.
Exptl. Biol. Med. Sci. 22: 251-55.
5. FUCHS, W. H. 1956. Ein Beitrag zur patholog-ischen Physiologie. Angew. Bot. 30: 141-46.
6. HUGHES, J. C. AND T. SWAIN. 1960. Scopoletin production in potato tubers infected with
Phyto-phthora intfestanis. Phytopathology. 50: 389-401.
7. KIRCHNER, J. G., J. M. MILLER, AND G. J. KELLER. 1951. Separation and identification of some ter-penes by a new chromatographic technique. Anal. Chem. 23: 420-25.
8. TA'MARI, K. AND J. KAJI. 1959. Biochemical studies on the blast disease of rice plant. Part
XII. The isolation of coumarin from the blast disease rice plant. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 33:
178-80.
9. URITANI, I. AND HOSHIYA. 1953. Phytophatho-logical chemistry of the black-rotted sweet potato.
Part VI. Isolation of coumarin substances from sweet potato and their physiclogy. J. Agr. Chemn. Soc. Japan 27: 161-64.
10. URITANI, I. AND M1. MIYANO. 1955. Derivatives of caffeic acid in sweet potato attacked by black rot. Nature 175: 812.
11. URITANTI, I. AND M. A. STAHMIANN. 1961.
Pecto-lytic enzymes of Ceratocwstis fizbriata. Phyto-pathology. 51: 277-85.