• No results found

Rossmore, OSV 0002404, 01 May 2018

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Rossmore, OSV 0002404, 01 May 2018"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Page 1 of 14

Report of an inspection of a

Designated Centre for Disabilities

(Adults)

Name of designated

centre:

Rossmore

Name of provider:

St Michael's House

Address of centre:

Dublin 6w

(2)

Page 2 of 14

About the designated centre

The following information has been submitted by the registered provider and describes the service they provide.

Rossmore provides full-time residential support to male and female adults. Rossmore is based on the social care model and aims to support residents to live as

independently as possible. This service is located in a residential area, and within walking distance of local amenities such as shops and leisure facilities. The centre is close to public transport which enables residents to access additional facilities in their local community. The centre comprises one large two-storey dwelling. Residents have access to a communal sitting room, kitchen/dining room, utility room with laundry facilities and another small sitting room. In addition, there is two communal bathrooms provided, located on the ground floor and first floor of the centre. There were gardens to the front and rear of the centre, which residents had access to. The staff team are assigned throughout day based on the assessed needs of residents'. In addition, at night, an over-night staff is available to provide assistance to residents if required.

The following information outlines some additional data on this centre.

Current registration end

date:

01/10/2018

Number of residents on the

date of inspection:

(3)

Page 3 of 14

How we inspect

To prepare for this inspection the inspector or inspectors reviewed all information about this centre. This included any previous inspection findings, registration information, information submitted by the provider or person in charge and other unsolicited information since the last inspection.

As part of our inspection, where possible, we:

 speak with residents and the people who visit them to find out their experience of the service,

 talk with staff and management to find out how they plan, deliver and monitor

the care and support services that are provided to people who live in the centre,

 observe practice and daily life to see if it reflects what people tell us,

 review documents to see if appropriate records are kept and that they reflect practice and what people tell us.

In order to summarise our inspection findings and to describe how well a service is doing, we group and report on the regulations under two dimensions of:

1. Capacity and capability of the service:

This section describes the leadership and management of the centre and how effective it is in ensuring that a good quality and safe service is being provided. It outlines how people who work in the centre are recruited and trained and whether there are appropriate systems and processes in place to underpin the safe delivery and oversight of the service.

2. Quality and safety of the service:

This section describes the care and support people receive and if it was of a good quality and ensured people were safe. It includes information about the care and supports available for people and the environment in which they live.

(4)

Page 4 of 14

This inspection was carried out during the following times:

Date

Times of

Inspection

Inspector

Role

01 May 2018 09:15hrs to

(5)

Page 5 of 14

Views of people who use the service

The inspector met with six residents who used this service. Residents, who spoke with the inspector, stated they were happy with the service and care provided. They also confirmed that they had good access to the local community and enjoyed living in the centre. Residents were also offered choice with their day services and some were supported to enjoy a home based programme. All residents appeared

comfortable and relaxed in the company of each other and with staff, throughout the inspection.

Feedback forms were received by the inspector and these confirmed the satisfaction with the service at this time.

Capacity and capability

Overall, governance and management arrangements ensured that a good quality and safe service was provided for residents living at this centre.

The provider ensured that the service was subject to ongoing monitoring, review and development. This had resulted in an improved standard of care, support and safety being provided to residents living at the centre. For example, residents were provided individualised daily programmes where required, which reflected a person centred approach. Six-monthly audits of the centre’s practices were being carried out by the management team and staff carried out regular audits of areas such as, medication management and residents' finances. Records showed that the provider had identified areas of non-compliance, however, no clear plan or time frames were in place to clearly address the identified risks in a report dated March 2017.

The person in charge was based in the centre and worked closely with staff. She was, therefore, well known to the residents and was very familiar with their up-to-date care and support needs. There were suitable cover arrangements in place to ensure that staff were adequately supported when the person in charge was off duty.

(6)

Page 6 of 14

residents.

The management team ensured that safe and effective recruitment practices were in place so that staff had the required skills, experience and competencies to carry out their roles and responsibilities. They ensured that all staff had undergone Garda Síochána vetting as a primary safeguarding measure for ensuring that residents were safe and protected from abuse.

Rosters, and discussions with staff, showed that there were sufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff to support residents’ assessed needs and especially their daily activities programme. The inspector observed, and staff confirmed,

that staffing arrangements ensured that residents were able to take part in activities of their choice in the centre and the local community.

The provider had measures in place to review and evaluate risks, and for the recording and reviewing of adverse incidents and complaints. There had been a low level of accidents, incidents and complaints and there had been no serious accidents involving residents.

Regulation 14: Persons in charge

The role of the person in charge was full time and the person who filled this role had the required qualifications and experience. The person in charge was very

knowledgeable regarding the individual needs of each resident.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 15: Staffing

Planned staffing rosters had been developed and these were accurate at the time of inspection. Staffing levels and skill-mixes provided, reflected the assessed needs of all residents in the centre.

Judgment: Compliant

(7)

Page 7 of 14

Staff who worked in the centre had received training in all mandatory courses as required by the organisation. In addition, a training needs analysis had also been completed to identify specialised training required in the service.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 19: Directory of residents

The person in charge had maintained a directory of all residents in the centre and this contained the information required by the regulations. It also reflected any nights when residents did not reside in the centre.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 22: Insurance

The provider had ensured and maintained up-to-date insurance for the centre as required by the regulations.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 23: Governance and management

Governance and management arrangements in place had ensured that there was a high standard of care provided in the centre. This was regularly monitored and residents were supported in-line with their assessed needs. The provider had completed all actions identified from the last inspection; however, they had no plan in place to complete issues identified in a fire risk report completed in March 2017.

Judgment: Substantially compliant

Regulation 24: Admissions and contract for the provision of services

(8)

Page 8 of 14

Judgment: Substantially compliant

Regulation 3: Statement of purpose

There was a statement of purpose that described the service being provided to residents and met most of the requirements of the regulations. However, further improvement was required as it did not clearly state some of the information required be regulations. The provider reviewed the statement of purpose on an annual basis.

Judgment: Substantially compliant

Regulation 31: Notification of incidents

The provider had arrangements in place to ensure that notifiable events under regulations were submitted to the Chief Inspector.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 34: Complaints procedure

Residents were aware of their right to make a complaint and the provider had arrangements in place to ensure that all complaints were recorded and investigated in-line with the organisational policy

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 4: Written policies and procedures

All policies required by Schedule 5 of the regulations were available to guide staff. However, the guidance provided in the recruitment policy did not clearly inform staff about vetting procedures that were required, in-line with national policy.

(9)

Page 9 of 14

Quality and safety

The inspector found that support arrangements in place at the centre ensured that residents were both protected from harm and supported in accordance with their assessed needs. Support arrangements at the centre also assisted residents to develop greater independence through a range of interventions which supported individuals to take positive risks in their day-to-day lives. Residents told the inspector that they felt safe at the centre and got on well with the staff who supported them.

The provider had ensured that some measures were in place to protect residents and staff from the risk of fire. These included up to date servicing of fire fighting extinguishers, the central heating boiler and the fire alarm system. Staff also carried out a range of fire safety checks. The fire evacuation procedure was displayed, staff had received formal fire safety training and effective fire evacuation drills involving residents and staff were carried out. Further improvement was required throughout the centre as identified in a fire report completed in March 2017. This report listed a range of fire measures that required improvement, which included: self closing devices on all doors, fire rated glass where required, gaps were noted on several doors and emergency lighting required improvement. However, the provider had not identified a time frame for completion of all work required and there was no clear plan in place at the time of inspection. Residents were engaging and completing fire drills and also had evacuation plans in place to ensure staff knew how to support all residents in the event of a fire.

The management team had taken measures to safeguard residents from being harmed or suffering abuse. There was a policy and all staff had received training in safeguarding. This ensured that they had the knowledge and skills to treat each resident with respect and dignity and to recognise the signs of abuse and or neglect.

Residents accessed a range of activities during the day both at the centre and in the local community which reflected their assessed needs. Residents told the inspector about holidays and activities they enjoyed during the week as well as the day service placements they attended. Residents also told the inspector that they were able to independently get to work, but if they required staff support this was readily available . Where residents were less independent than their peers, appropriate supports were put in place by staff to ensure their needs were met. Residents also told the inspector that they enjoyed social activities such as going to the

visiting family and having a drink in local pubs and restaurants. At the time of the inspection, several residents were also planning holidays in Ireland and aboard. Furthermore, the person in charge also ensured that the aging needs were

supported as assessed and residents had choice to actively retire in the centre. As a result individualised programmes were in place which reflected the assessed needs of residents.

(10)

Page 10 of 14

regarding appropriate storage, had been suitably addressed by the person in charge. Staff were observed to complete weekly audits of the medication stored in the centre. On review of the medication files, the inspector found that they were through and comprehensive, however, no assessments were completed to identify residents ability to self medicate.

The design and layout of the centre ensured that it was fully accessible and residents told the inspector that they liked living at the centre. Residents had personalised their bedrooms which reflected their personal choice. There were adequate storage facilities in place for their personal possessions. Overall, the inspector found that the centre was in a good state of repair and decoration throughout.

Regulation 13: General welfare and development

Residents were supported to participate in a range of activities which reflected their assessed needs, interests and personal goals. The provider ensured that support was provided in-line with residents' personal plans. This also promoted

their independence at the centre and accessing their local community.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 17: Premises

(11)

Page 11 of 14

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 18: Food and nutrition

Residents' nutritional needs were well met. Residents chose, and took part, in

shopping for their own food. Suitable foods were provided to suit any special dietary needs of residents.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 20: Information for residents

The person in charge and provider had ensured that all information as required by the regulations were available in the designated centre at the time if inspection.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 26: Risk management procedures

Risk management arrangements ensured that risks were identified, monitored and regularly reviewed and reflected staff practices and knowledge. Personal emergency evacuation plans had been developed for each resident, which provided sufficient guidance on how to ensure resident safety.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 27: Protection against infection

There were measures in place to protect residents from the spread of infection. These included an up-to-date infection control policy, and effective cleaning systems and procedures for food safety management.

Judgment: Compliant

(12)

Page 12 of 14

While the person in charge had ensured that measures were in place to assist and support residents with fire precautions. Further improvement was required as significant work was evident throughout the centre. This included: fire

doors, intumescent seals, self closures, fire glass and emergency lighting. The provider was aware of all required works but had no clear plan in place at the time of inspection. The provider had a report completed in 2017 identifying all the required fire safety measures needed, however, none of these had been addressed and no clear plan was in place to complete this work.

Judgment: Not compliant

Regulation 29: Medicines and pharmaceutical services

There were safe medication management practices in the centre and there was an up-to-date policy to guide staff. Residents' medication was securely stored at the centre and staff who administered medication had received training in safe administration of medication. Issues identified in the last inspection had been completed satisfactorily. However, self assessments for administration of medications, had not been completed for all residents in the centre.

Judgment: Substantially compliant

Regulation 5: Individual assessment and personal plan

All residents' had personal plans developed and included their assessed needs. Annual personal planning meetings, which included the resident and their

representatives, were held as scheduled. Residents' personal goals were agreed at these meetings and reviewed as scheduled. These plans were also provided in a user-friendly format.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 6: Health care

The health needs of residents were assessed and they had good access to a range of healthcare services. This included, general practitioners, healthcare professionals and consultants. Plans of care for good health were developed for residents and reflected their assessed needs.

(13)

Page 13 of 14

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 7: Positive behavioural support

The provider had measures in place to support all residents with behaviours that challenge. Behaviour support plans had been developed where required with input from a psychologist or behaviour support specialist. Plans were implemented and the occurrences of incidents arising from behaviours that challenge were minimal at the time of inspection. All staff had completed training in relation to management of behaviours that challenge.

Judgment: Compliant

Regulation 8: Protection

Arrangements were in place to ensure that all residents were safeguarded from harm or abuse in the centre. All staff had received training in-line with national and local policies. All staff had received training in safeguarding and there was an up-to-date policy in place to guide staff. The management team were clear about what constituted abuse and demonstrated proactive measures that would be taken in response to a suspicion of abuse.

(14)

Page 14 of 14

Appendix 1 - Full list of regulations considered under each dimension

Regulation Title

Judgment

Capacity and capability

Regulation 14: Persons in charge Compliant

Regulation 15: Staffing Compliant

Regulation 16: Training and staff development Compliant Regulation 19: Directory of residents Compliant

Regulation 22: Insurance Compliant

Regulation 23: Governance and management Substantially compliant Regulation 24: Admissions and contract for the provision of

services Substantially compliant

Regulation 3: Statement of purpose Substantially compliant Regulation 31: Notification of incidents Compliant Regulation 34: Complaints procedure Compliant Regulation 4: Written policies and procedures Substantially

compliant

Quality and safety

Regulation 13: General welfare and development Compliant

Regulation 17: Premises Compliant

Regulation 18: Food and nutrition Compliant Regulation 20: Information for residents Compliant Regulation 26: Risk management procedures Compliant Regulation 27: Protection against infection Compliant Regulation 28: Fire precautions Not compliant Regulation 29: Medicines and pharmaceutical services Substantially

compliant Regulation 5: Individual assessment and personal plan Compliant

Regulation 6: Health care Compliant

Regulation 7: Positive behavioural support Compliant

Regulation 8: Protection Compliant

(15)

Page 1 of 7

Compliance Plan for Rossmore OSV-0002404

Inspection ID: MON-0023738

Date of inspection: 01/05/2018

Introduction and instruction

This document sets out the regulations where it has been assessed that the provider or person in charge are not compliant with the Health Act 2007 (Care and Support of Residents in Designated Centres for Persons (Children And Adults) With Disabilities) Regulations 2013, Health Act 2007 (Registration of Designated Centres for Persons (Children and Adults with Disabilities) Regulations 2013 and the National Standards for Residential Services for Children and Adults with Disabilities.

This document is divided into two sections:

Section 1 is the compliance plan. It outlines which regulations the provider or person in charge must take action on to comply. In this section the provider or person in charge must consider the overall regulation when responding and not just the individual non compliances as listed section 2.

Section 2 is the list of all regulations where it has been assessed the provider or person in charge is not compliant. Each regulation is risk assessed as to the impact of the non-compliance on the safety, health and welfare of residents using the service.

A finding of:

Substantially compliant - A judgment of substantially compliant means that the provider or person in charge has generally met the requirements of the regulation but some action is required to be fully compliant. This finding will have a risk rating of yellow which is low risk.

Not compliant - A judgment of not compliant means the provider or person

(16)

Page 2 of 7

Section 1

The provider and or the person in charge is required to set out what action they have taken or intend to take to comply with the regulation in order to bring the centre back into compliance. The plan should be SMART in nature. Specific to that regulation, Measurable so that they can monitor progress, Achievable and Realistic, and Time bound. The response must consider the details and risk rating of each regulation set out in section 2 when making the response. It is the provider’s responsibility to ensure they implement the actions within the timeframe.

Compliance plan provider’s response:

Regulation Heading Judgment

Regulation 23: Governance and

management Substantially Compliant

Outline how you are going to come into compliance with Regulation 23: Governance and management:

The registered provider has a plan in place for the completion of the works required as identified in the fire risk report. Plan as follows

1. Self closing doors installation to be completed by 31st December 2018.

2. Cold smoke seals replace intumescent strip with combined intumescent strip/cold smoke seals by 30th September 2018.

3. Review of doors to dining and sitting room to ensure fire resistant glazing in place and upgrade where needed to be completed by 30th September 2018.

4. Emergency Lighting issue identified in report was addressed and completed in 2017.

5. Fire Alarm detection in hot press to be installed by 31st December 2018.

Regulation 24: Admissions and

contract for the provision of services Substantially Compliant

Outline how you are going to come into compliance with Regulation 24: Admissions and contract for the provision of services:

(17)

Page 3 of 7

Regulation 3: Statement of purpose Substantially Compliant

Outline how you are going to come into compliance with Regulation 3: Statement of purpose:

The PIC reviewed the Statement of purpose and it contains the information required as set out in Schedule 1 (copy of same attached).

Regulation 4: Written policies and

procedures Substantially Compliant

Outline how you are going to come into compliance with Regulation 4: Written policies and procedures:

The registered provider is in the process of updating the recruitment policy in line with the national policy on vetting procedures. This will be completed by 30th November 2018.

Regulation 28: Fire precautions Not Compliant

Outline how you are going to come into compliance with Regulation 28: Fire precautions: The registered provider has a plan in place to address the fire safety measures as

identified in Fire risk report completed in March 2017. Plan as follows

1. Self closing doors installation to be completed by 31st December 2018.

2. Cold smoke seals replace intumescent strip with combined intumescent strip/cold smoke seals by 30th September 2018.

3. Review of doors to dining and sitting room to ensure fire resistant glazing in place and upgrade where needed to be completed by 30th September 2018.

4. Emergency Lighting issue identified in report was addressed and completed in 2017.

5. Fire Alarm detection in hot press to be installed by 31st December 2018.

Regulation 29: Medicines and

(18)

Page 4 of 7

Outline how you are going to come into compliance with Regulation 29: Medicines and pharmaceutical services:

(19)

Page 5 of 7

Section 2:

Regulations to be complied with

The provider or person in charge must consider the details and risk rating of the following regulations when completing the compliance plan in section 1. Where a regulation has been risk rated red (high risk) the inspector has set out the date by which the provider or person in charge must comply. Where a regulation has been risk rated yellow (low risk) or orange (moderate risk) the provider must include a date (DD Month YY) of when they will be compliant.

The registered provider or person in charge has failed to comply with the following regulation(s).

Regulation Regulatory

requirement Judgment Risk rating Date to be complied with

Regulation

23(1)(c) The registered provider shall ensure that management systems are in place in the designated centre to ensure that the service provided is safe, appropriate to residents’ needs, consistent and effectively monitored. Substantially

Compliant Yellow 1. 31/12/2018 2. 30/09/2018 3. 30/09/2018 4. completed 2017

5. 31/12/2018

Regulation 24(3) The registered provider shall, on admission, agree in writing with each resident, their representative where the resident is not capable of giving consent, the terms on which that resident shall reside in the designated centre.

Substantially

Compliant Yellow 31/05/2018

Regulation 28(1) The registered provider shall ensure that

effective fire safety

(20)

Page 6 of 7

management systems are in place.

2017

5. 31/12/2018

Regulation

28(2)(a) The registered provider shall take adequate

precautions

against the risk of fire in the

designated centre, and, in that

regard, provide suitable fire fighting equipment, building services, bedding and furnishings.

Not Compliant Orange 1. 31/12/2018 2. 30/09/2018 3. 30/09/2018 4. completed 2017 5. 31/12/2018 Regulation

28(2)(c) The registered provider shall provide adequate means of escape, including

emergency lighting.

Not Compliant Orange 4. completed 2017

Regulation

28(3)(a) The registered provider shall make adequate arrangements for detecting,

containing and extinguishing fires.

Not Compliant Orange 1. 31/12/2018 2. 30/09/2018 3. 30/09/2018 4. completed 2017

5. 31/12/2018

Regulation 29(5) The person in charge shall ensure that following a risk assessment and assessment of capacity, each resident is

encouraged to take responsibility for his or her own medication, in accordance with his or her wishes and preferences and in line with his or her age and the

Substantially

(21)

Page 7 of 7

nature of his or her disability. Regulation 03(1) The registered

provider shall prepare in writing a statement of purpose containing the information set out in Schedule 1.

Substantially

Compliant Yellow 31/05/2018

Regulation 04(3) The registered provider shall review the policies and procedures referred to in paragraph (1) as often as the chief inspector may require but in any event at intervals not exceeding 3 years and, where necessary, review and update them in accordance with best practice.

Substantially

References

Related documents

Despite a complete lack of activity of fluconazole against all of the fila- mentous fungal isolates when it was tested alone, synergy was observed with MGCD290 for 60% of

coronary flow either by the administrationi of coronary vasodilators or by increasing coronary perfusion pres- sure, was noted while the ventricle contracted iso- volumically at a

Continued distal movement of tubular fluid after the administration of ethacrynic acid during ureteral occlusion would have resulted in the admixture of tubu- lar fluid from the site

Combined VNTR loci with higher variability are useful markers for resolving closely related isolates, whereas combined loci with lower vari- ability are suitable for establishing

Data analysis showed a statistically significant inverse correlation between relative telomere length and TERT expression at mRNA level (R = –0.24; P = 0.02;

Based on the SYBR green primer sets and TaqMan probes designed as described above, we developed qPCR assays with the dual objectives of developing a sensitive assay that could

The assay targets a partial sequence of the Blastocystis small ribosomal subunit (SSU) rRNA gene, allowing subtyping (ST) of Blastocystis isolates by direct sequencing of

First, the proportion of nosocomial cases within all cases (based on the cutoff of onset of norovirus illness ⬎ 4 days after admission) was calculated for the genotype categories