SOPHY
SITY
1961
CHEMISTRY
OEPT'i. LIBR. 'tHESIS --'---·~
1
A D D 1 ) 3)4)
5) 1) 2) 3) 1) 2)c
s.
..
s Contribut
• • • • • • 4 • • • ~ •
" "
..
..
ssure
.
..
..
..
..
" "..
..
""
..
"
• "
A
0 R
D 1) 2) 3)
4)
5) 6) 1 ) 2) 3) l+) 5) 1) 2) 3)4)
5) 6)7}
8) 9) 1) R LlG AV R a) b) c) d)..
..
..
..
" "..
.. ..
..
..
..
..
..
"
D.V Hammett.,o;
"
.
.
~.
.
.
.
. .
.
. .
. .
..
II"
..
" "
..
..
..
..
"..
..
".. ..
..
..
..
..
"Rate C
a.
..
• • • •
•
• • "..
..
..
o ..
..
.
..
2) a
"
..
..
"
..
..
"..
..
118a) J:::,.V• values ..
..
..
..
..
..
•..
.. ..
..
..
• 118b) A
.
-·
..
..
•..
•
..
..
" '"
..
..
1e) "'
..
" .....
..
..
..
..
0..
" ,. 1
c
"..
1/...
" "
..
..
..
" "..
1e)
..
.. ..
..
over a 1
benzene
UNIVERSITY OF
I
on
'
.
'
measure can
cases.,
by
resolmnce a
a
resona:ace
;o·
6' (1)(1) can
(
(2)
of'~'P~
%?[- (
Ll.~G= (•.DAV*")/2, T 6
;6 L\
v;
tJ
b.V;
is4
,.T .. 6 )}
(4)
a var
on
a
e
heirolytic
ase 1) ..
e
Fo~ a
more
a
case
f
Oases 2
5
5
e::.v*
b
s to
an
Case 3,
--~
S-.Rol~
- C-X + Y - ----7Ro ..
-c
H~
~ -', 2.- H - ',
~-2
13 on
1
:non-11
rr EUl1TntUll1 and
v,rere
is some
1
)
13
PRESSURE
PIPE
FIG
II
I
THRUST
4 1-SCREW
BOMB
---»--HEAD
B
I
~--~---·--- y ---:>: A
L---l: _____ -- .
.vx
··---I\BOMB
CAY IT Y
, A
[image:21.597.75.559.68.744.2]Nt c fiR nn1..: IN/Ri!
o·o22" cro:t.
ST¢<c-l. 61/U<uv'Cf.
[image:24.597.40.555.58.775.2].5 Ct'{~ 1..1
FIGI12
FIG
.:SIL..V'<IC~ sr~:.c~ WFtsut::llf;
3
FIG
ll
4
SMALL ORIFICE
814 SOCKET----+
CELL
PLATINUM ELECTRODES
NICHROME WIRE
~----TEFLON BAG
c
VARIABLE CONDENSER
FIG
II
5
OSCILLATOR
A
B
CONDUCTIVITY CELL.
[image:26.597.38.557.63.745.2]1
11,111 .. 1 1
1
as area a,.
K/c ( 2)
ons )
)
"
'(
K v2 0 0 + . 1
-
(4)
1
(5)
(7)
'A'
cant f
1
an t
..
A on
cone
'A
1:f'
'A'
'A'
" ot; ::;:: 11-"A'I
'
I2 8
1~
1 ~3 ::;::1-~3
t:t
( )
:1,/~,
)1 500 1000 1500
1 t~ 1. 1.1 1c~1 1.1 1.
001 1 1 .. ·t.101 1.1 1.171 1.1 1 ..
o.
1 1.054 1. 1 .. 1 ·J,.1 1 . .1 1, 71 1. 1 .. 1.1 1·1 1 • .1 1. 7
o.
1 1;. 1 .. 1 .. 1 1..1 1 .. 1 1. 6mean 1 1 .. 1 .. 1.1 1.1 1 1 .. 7
Ao
:0::: 16)1 1 2500
0.,001 1 1.037 1. 1,. 1. 1. 1.
0.0015 1 1 .. 1 1·078 1. 1. 1 ..
1 1 .. 037 1. 1 .. 1, 1. 1
rae an 1 1. 1• 1. 1.~
1 1
none (115 .. 0) 1. 1. 1 .. 1 ..
i .. 2) 1 1 .. 1., 1 3 1 ..
(1 2) 1. 1 .. 1 .. 1.,01}.8 1 .. 040
(1 1 .. 041 1 .. 1 .. 01+9 1 ..
044
1 ..(11 4) 1 .. 1 .. 1. 1., 1" 1 ..
(1 9) 1" 1 .. 1 .. 1 .. 1 .. 1 ..
( 108 .. 4) 1 .. 1 .. 01;.1 1 .. 1" 050 1 .. 1 ..
)
'Ao
1 1none ( 107 .. t}) 1 .. 1 1 ..
(1 "7) 1 1" Oit.7 1 ...
(1 ) 1.,01~1 1 .. 1 "
(1 7) 1,. 1., 1 ..
(1
4)
1 .. 1 .. 1 ..(1 ) 'i .. 1. 1"
(1 2) 1 .. 1 .. 054 1 ..
(1 9) 1 .. Olt.2 1 .. 1 ..
p ) 1 1
1
n
u
)
1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
11 14
1
1
1
3
!t.35 .. 10
1
1 1
7 ...
"' 2
'i 1" 3'1
1 1 1
6 ·:r '")'">'Cl
~ '- u
30
e
) /1 "A'
¥;
1 1
II 1
II 1 1
1 1
" 1
" 1
1
1 tl-1 048 152
" 1
, 1 1
II 1 1
1
1
1
1
"
II 1 1 971
" 1 1
77
1
1 747
" '1
1
1 1
1 1 1
1
1 1
II 1
1
u n u H
"
n II ,, 1/ ,, PlbM,) 1 1 1 1 1000 1 3000 1 1 i 1 1/1
It;
1
9571 9.
1 63
o ..
414431"' 10
9571 870
1
)
:::1'
)(:
1
14
H
1.
1 1.
H 1 1
1 .. 1 It
1 .. 1
H 1
tJ.19 6
11' 1
It
1
H 1
1
n ·1
tt 1
1
1 .. 1
It
II 1
1 ..
1 1 ..
1 ..
n 1
1 ..
)
:A
I 2p
3":t
0 ..
974
4 ..
7n
415
u 1 l,j..,
tf 1 1
It
1
It 1
021
1 78
o.
076._
414
tt
1
24419 ..
780 4 ..
H 1500 30
774
u 1 40
H 1
l.J ...
'11 1 970
9 ..
4 ..
011 .. 1 61 .. 04L} L~ .. 516
u
970 4,.416
it 1000
11
tf
1
n 2000
n H 8 974 !! 974
tt ·t
4 ..
313H
1 1
H 1
1
9
.,
II
,.
f l
.,
P ( 6a.v-s) 1
1
1 1
)
1
1
1 13
1
411
4 ..
74
4
9714 410
9710 14- ..
0
4.
o ..
4 .. 11
4 ..
013c
A It~
4.
14,.
9. u 1
7 ..
u
n 1.
1
VI 1
41
!~LJ.It
ff 101 ..
000 1
..
u 1000
77 .. 09
L~1n
n
760
400 1
0,..9604
Lh3141!' 1
n 2000
47
n
111 1 51 ..
1 71.
"
"It
1 .. 1
't-.r:~
1 .. 1 83 .. 379 .. 0 .. 9545 1 .. 158
936
It 1 11
41
o ..
1 .. 794 3 .. 746
tt 2000 1 30
o ..
It 3000 1 460 .. 67
o ..
577 446
1, . 1 8!+. 379 .. 47 0.9549 1 .. 131
n 1000 111 .. 415 ..
o ..
1 .. 749 757
H 2000 1 70
o ..
2.II 3000 1
53 9538
1 .. 1 80.14 379 .. 1+7
o.
95lt9 1 .. 058"
1000 1 l~1o ..
n 2000 1 .. 70 l,iJ-42 ..
o.
II 3000 1 ~ !~1
Oono.
3 P ) :;}
0-'2-
o40 -;;I j;
2.184 1 55.-34
..
0., 0,.6610 4.1n 1000 75.31 418.
o.
1. 13 .. 974
n 57 445 ..
o.
1 .. 580 801u 3
1 .. 1 4 .. 184
If 1000 1 41 1 .. 056
976
n 2000 1 1-+46 .. 00
o.
3 .. 802n 3000 154 ..
o ..
110 1 0.9594
It 1000
o ..
n 2000 1 0.9571 1 .. 590
n 3000 1 46lh 24
o.
6511 .. 1 70 .. 0.;. 0 .. 6730 Lt ... 172
if 1000
l+ 1 30
o ..
1 .. 080 3eIf 1
1 "
If 3000 1 JJ,l~ ... 49
641~
2 1 9571
u 1000 81 .. 0,. 1.,080
u 1
o.
1 .. 601 3 .. 796H 3000 1
o ..
2 .. 2791 1 43 .. 3!~ 91 0.4410
,, 1 67 417.,80
o.
7164
" 41+4 .. L~9 1 ..
p ) ;j'
r;
1 1
1
ll
1
3000 1 :2 8
1 ·1.,,
o.
l~39L~II
1 93 1+17 ..
o ..
7170 4 .. 14L~!I 2000
n 3000 1 0
1 .. 1
1
2000 f37 3
n 3000 11 62 B10
8 1
" 1-tl.t-01 lt..
·t 1J•17 °5
~-.. , ""' :/ 0 .. 71
2000 444.,74 1 .. 074
1 1 2
1. 0 1 377.57 0., 0 .. '7750 t\. .. 11"1
n 1 L~14 ... 1:) 3 .. 0
II 2000 1 L!l+O .. 62
01!1 1
tl 3000 1
.. 28
1 .. 1
!I 1 4Ht .. 13
1 3 .. 7'19
)
-;;'
'6
-1:.)..1 .. 1 51
o.
lt-..1121000 41L~ .. 15
o,
1 05 L~.0 .. 58 1 .. 816
n 1
"18
1. 1 1 Ol.t.
H 1 l~.l.j.O., 51
1 .. 1
1 .. 1
H ·t 1
11
1
1
..
1 .. 1 7405 lh 1
1 1" 180
1 .. 1
!! 1
97 .. 93
41
1 ~ 154.1
41
1., 713II 1
6Ht.
1
o ..
It 1
1 .. 19•1
1 ..
p )
?'
'6;
o4
1,. 1 •
o.
h .. 11 94. 419 .. 1 .. 191 9
!t 11 .. !~3
0 .. 9571 1,.
II
141+-15
..
o •
3 5091 7454 Lj ... 1
"
1000 419 .. 1 .. 1H 2000
11
o.
95 1+46 .. 1 .. 7B7 948 It1
c e) -;j
41
'l:l::l... o41 .. 4 1 87
o.
6o ..
4.219!t 1
77
lt20,o ..
009tf 115.,L~O 1 8
n 1 095
litt ion, Por
f::Hli' e , as
solut
of an unc
s
OI~
was
a litt
20
..
measurements e, ar•e in
a
some-..
7
2 2 3
425
1 1
3 2 1 1
2 1 1
4 ..
110 1on one t
i .. e ..
t
8
( )
r
r ss;o
(1 1 .. 039 :1 013 014
7
3 1. 013 014
1 1 .. 3 1+
1 1 .. 3 014
1. 013 i~
4 5 0
8 ( )
b)
s) [->
s;
n..
1 8
1 9
0 9
1+17 010 9
esonance
0
p 1
0 1
( )
6.V ..
5
9 ion
6V =
II' or 6V1
the same T
11 .. 09 9 ..
H
1
1000
can
(See
s
ion 5)6V 1,
one
'
a/oP
(ln K)by
2 1 47 8.84
1 1
11.77 1 16 11.
2500 3 0 .. 558
terms
the
s ar•e
2 3
56 1
reasonance
6V
(
ze:rw
D. b. V is
e ..
(by on
1,esonanee
a b.V versus <Y"
not
i :more
resonance-s comruon are
, in
a
more
resonance
1 on D.V/cr
more
or
one., over all,
it i of'
one
t its resonance d ( 1. e. O""R ) is
i ·· 1-+-+--1--1-+1-~ I +-+-t-t-1'-.+-+4- e-~ 1-1 ift++1t+++1t+++ -1-1+++
1 +-4H-++--·t++-1-l-+---l--.;..-f~+-l-++-t-t---l
~I -'··
i--1-=r
i--- f-· f- --H-t--+-~-l----if-l--+-1--H++~-+-H--H-t-+-1-1-+-++c...f-++-t--t-++-•-t-Hi--+-f---.J.. ---I· 1- +-·1-1-f-·+-+~HI-+-+- -l-H-+ +-++-+-+-++++-l~l--1-l-+--1-+-+-+-t-1'-·l++-1-l-+-++~f.-ji-++-l--H-+ - --'-+--: · 1- --I i- --· r- H++t+t+1 - · -'-· '- -+t+-t-1-t-+-+·+--1-+-t++-1-+-+--1-+~-1-+-++-1--t-H-+-+-..; '--,-·--l !-- 1 -- 1-· -f-+++--t-t-+++-1-+-+++l-++++--l-+-+-H-+-t+-H+I-+-+-t-+-1-++-t++-++!-+++--hH---1 f-- I - r- '-ri-+-H+-!-1--+-±+-1'-+·H-f--H-++-1-1-i---~1 -J--f.-ji
i.L ,_ -~ 5." _ -+-t-+++-'<::>-+1-+· _ -r-c cb i :_ i ---1---1--+-o~+ -f~ 1
t+-t-t-+H+1+t+-H--tlnt-+-+-t++-++-11-+-+++i-1 4-++.c-H
·-It is to on 3,
that, as P
s) 1 1000
-~v 11 .. 9 ..
'
6floP
=
6~V/2,.as 6. 6 V o~I6P
A[:j_ V zero seen
s
c
10
1500 2000
9 .. 12
a
s an
t
H
co
KNH6Ct
KNHl.NHO
I#
>
H N H3.>
10
H
(A)
It 1 ar sm
s
X X y y
0
+ y- k, )(
k., k. )
0
+
x-
-ca.)
(B)
( )
ca.ses,
s, 1
resonance
a are
resonance
resonance
was
(C)
on
( 1)
,
near en~llV*
sum
(2)
1
s ..
Bome
resonance
OS courset
a
FIG
ill
I
- - - - ·-
- -
--
- - --
--
- - - _. - --
--Br
Br
Br
A
CN
I
n
. - - -
- - - -
~----Br
Br
BrOocH,
N02.
N
y
Br
Br
Br
Br
N02. N02.
Yli
X
- - - : - - -
---:---Br
Br
Br
0
CHOXI
~-~ - - ~ - -- - -
-
- - - --
--
--
- --
- - - --
- - --
- --
- --
--Br
Br
[image:83.597.26.582.73.803.2]s
AD,
..
s of
corres-the reactivities a es
course it was
L
1
1
was
b)
new
s
YH!' 1
c) R O::rl a
a:t•e D 1
d)
)
s
8-was 1•un
just
was
T were
a
..
g)
s can
c
..
,.H., was
1
M P .. 1 ( 127°) ..
-
A commercP., 112 .. 5
-
11)
..was
"
vacuum-"
e to remove
was
0
77 ..
)
to a
=
1,.84;).
)
)
..5
-vacuum
5
CH3 CH~ CH?.
Nqo~
NOz. NqoNO.,_ N01.0
N07.>
lh-
-~)
I~
--7>
I~
(i)
'
0 ( 0) :1!
( )
N07. NH7. Br
!I .. 1
ac
7.,5
- 171°
( ) was
(
)
( 5 ( 1 .. 5
(5
(iii) 2,
some
( ) was
4.
were
15 5
corres-H Ac
\ /
N NHAc
N Hi.
~
H, _ _HA_c_~>
ll_)
Ac2.06
CH_3 - - - - ? >
/./ Br-2.
>
OCH~
HCI
)
0c
H3 _ _ H_N_0-"'2.=---;i!>)y
CuCNBr
(i)
( 17
CN
A C H 3
y
Br
Br
) waa
{
)
(7370) was
(iv)
)
"
NH?.
ooc~
Br
( 1) ion
HN02.
>
Cu.CN
CN
AocH~
v
Br
( )
H
( )
t"'tS raue if:i.ltrate
c
H 0 Nr:1
}o .52 2-.54 20 ..
64
44
3
..
6 01+(
one
to
(i)
with
( 10 was
excess
sol , dilute
e solution, er•
alcohol, which the pure (
as (15
(ii) 4-Ethyl-3,
5-(44 a 1
to a
, to remove excess
A
( )
(
)
""""~M..!J<;; ... ,,.,...,. by
" ' " '1''\T>I<>T> \,;>1Uf.UnJ.J.._,iA was UU<!<LU •. >z:> on
)
65 12
lt 5
96
19
excess
15
( 80';()
1
(
two
0
1 1
at
X 1
6
-4
a 5 ..
1°/760
rmn .. , wasuse ..
to allow the
R
enes
s
t
to
a
non-, on
use
Here R is
t
on
=
1 ) .. 1 x1
(3)
..
s were
FIG
III
2
[image:105.602.49.562.56.772.2]
:non-
t
(1M .. ) that
were carr
( cone
91
ot:
p I( ( ) R (
)
1 5 11
1 1016
1
1
1 11
, _L -1--+-+ 1-+-+-f.++ .1 ~
i-
L' . .j __ j_~-+j --i-- -!.' -L-l-1--J -+-.J-.+--1-+++++-+-I+H-i--t-t-t!--lll_l _ -r--f-- t-1 +-·t-1-,+-+- -+ 1- --1-
-1.-L ~+--1--1~++1-1-+--t+-t-:---H- -!-- - i--l-1--L-H-l--:l--+++-+--+--H t- .!---+---+--'•-+-+-+~+- - t - t--
+-r=t=i-
f-- :- __ r- 1-· ···--+~---1---·H--+-1-+-+-++t++i++---+t-_t,..++---H+r·r-t-lH-t'
-r-r-t-Hitt:t+f--1--- -r-r-t-Hitt:t+f--1--- -I---+~i----f--+-1-+--t-+-t--t-j
,__,
I
-1
)~·-
h-t--j:I+
!-'- --I
b-+-ieltL +
ease
)
)
p ) 1 1
/11'1/J, 1 1 "171
/Jp/4, 1
no
1500
1.
1 ..
A 0
2000
1 .. 1
1 .• 1
c
3000
1~
1 ..
(I ,. ).
were to
A
c
(
was so
c
7.. 1
1 04
..
(
d
0
"'
..
46 ..
)II
6 ..
6 ..
or
)
a
manner
N
11 .. 11 ..
1
excess
(2 ) was
'
(
.. P,.
N 11.
'
ethanol to (1 50%) ..
:-(concentrations dissolving the accurately
was filled
piston could
was filtered
for
c
1)-benzophenone)
1
into the barrel, thus fine e was then
r
c
81 ..
48
81 .. 47... 10-2
::> X
(
excess reaction
'
n
7 .. 00 7 ..
and the two cell were
the whole operation could
any
to
the bomb
insulation
initial
one hour was init
in a
The cell 1
bomb.. After the hydraulic
hours were
N
5.
5 .. 28
up by
1
10, 000 ohrns. some
so that one
the
time ..
(10,000- 500 ohms) within a
(on
reed
was
the
in
as zero ..
e
c~:.u3e.
for the
(t~) P .. t7)
the All
the
product, at
mean
for the
1
er needle, througll a • .,.,..,.,.-~-·"""'''"•
ance even
Vias still a
rate
was stax•ted
minimum this
)
of one sec
500
was d( 1;1t )/dt
of'
ion
could
in
dx/d( 1/R) was by
the plot ( 1/R)
mean ( 1/R)
were
tion
Run II Or
Oono ..
Cone ..
was still
The above was compound had reacted.
III
Cone ..
ax/d(1/R)
=
1 ..d(1/R )/dt =
o:f'
over the
=
o.
k:::: 2 ..
1
the
the o:f' rneasu1•ernent is
when 20% the original
bromo-=
1.,067 X 1=
o.
k
=
/mole/min ..of
(a T (
c
1 0 R A=
k =:I)
1;Rx1o3
1 ..
1 .. .5106
1 .. 5152
1 .. 1 .. 1 ..
( 1/R)
) ove:r• t
)
d:x:/d( 1;1,{)
1 .. 1919 X 1
t
R 650
t is
d( 1/R )/dt
=
~
..
$ are
1/Rx1 1. 1 .. 1 .. 104 "
1 .. 5480
1 ..
105
In ( (4))
the dx/d(1/R).,
, the
may error
as were mea "~ ... ~1'1-,
eould
d(1/R )/dt in
0., R
2 are
.. Only k
k are
)
1 63
6.99
1000 10 .. 10 .. 54
1500 15 .. 15 -1 01
2000 20.60
•
30 .. 21
3000 L~O .. 41 .. 20
p )
1
3.
614-
191000 7 .. 24 7 .. 20
1 1 80
1
3000
106
~onstants, k, (in
I
:for
piperidine in
are given,
thewere 300 k
3.74
6 .. 43 6 .. 63
10 .. 43 10 ..
14 .. 1 02
21 .. 62
..
81 •
40 ..
40 ..54
4 .. 84
4.99
7.12 7 .. 19
10 .. 40 1
1 !~0 1
15 20 ..
15
P(bars)
1 08 04 2.10 2..-07
500 2.45
2.51
54 2,.501000
3.
311500
4 ..
18 4 .. 184 ..
18 l+-182000 5 .. 61 61 6.3
5.
2500 7-05
14
7 .. Hi 7 .. 123000 8., 75 8,.70
P(bars) Mean
1 1. 00 1 .. 99
500 1;{.. 87
4 ..
971000
80
6 .. 62i 11. 11 .. 11.,l:t.-O 11 .. 3!~
1 16.,03 1 14,6 16 ..
2500 12
01
4.8
30 ..
47
l?(ba:r-s)
1 0.,76
o ..
0.,73 0 ..71
o.
1 .. 1. 1 .. 31 1 ..
1000 10 16
14
1500
5.18 5. 21 21
7 .. 7 .. 46
108
P(bare)
1 1.24
1.24
1.- 1.500 2.1~2 !~2 2 .. 44 2~Lt-3
1000 L~ .. 18 4.20
4 ..
18 l,~. 191500
7.
6.81
6.76
6 ..10.09 10 .. 11 10.,15 1 12
2500 1 71 1 78 13. 1 72
3000 1 19 .. 52 19.
P(bars) Mean
1 00 1.89 04 2.18 2 .. 02
500 6.18
6.
6.19
6 ..1000 19 .. 64 19.58 19.38 19.
1500
30
52 .. 4850 ..
77
53. 51 ..2000 109 102 102 104
P(bars)
1
{1.56
1 .. 70 1 ..37
1 .. 57 1 .. 44 1.61 1 .. 54
500
1000
3.69
3 ..1500 4.86 09
2000
7-79
8.15 7 .. 977 .. 97
2500
15.97
16. 16 ..91
16 .. 401
P(bars)
1
i
o.
537
0.578
0,.6120.573
0.581
0 .. 557500 1 ~o; 1 .. 1,. 08 1,.08 1.06
1000 74 1 .. 74
17
1 ..87
1 .. 881500
~
45
61 84 90 .3.-094lt.
54 3 .. 842000
{4.47
4 .. 33 4.90 4-491.4; •• 62 lh 1.3
2.500
;.
; .. 87
3000
7-51
7.64
7 .. 44 ( .. 53P(bars)
1 21 2.70 42
94
3 .. 07500
4 ..
58 ! .... 75 4 .. 744.69
1000 6,.86
6 ..
6,.90 6.901500 9-73 10 .. 03
9 ..
g ..2000 13.64
13.
1 13 .. 452500 18 .. 81 1 30 1 55
3000 22 .. 82 47
24 ..
03)
p
1
4 ..
4 ..
17
214.
500
7.46
7 ..
7.48
1000 1
60
10., 1 10 ..1 {1
~13
..1 1 1
2000 19 .. 1
18 ..
30 .. 29 ..
.go
110
~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - The results at
a trno SJ>her ic
011
s,.
Br0 0
CN N~I IV
<9
0.374
19.9The most
dinitrobenzene (VII).,
approximately the sarne
constants, it
stud1.ecl
ivit at
Br
Br Br0
NO,_ NO;t
0 0
COCH3
COC<..Hs-VII XII
20.,2
0.307
0.,423(
)
are highly activa.t
:F'rom the
1
both substituent dinitro
ive of the because, on
"additivity constantan , :2:..
o-the
IV or VII, but is more
(XII)
ive than
This is
is
case, as
c--a
for
on
and so
In connect with
noting that the uncertainty
the common
{XI) ..
cr-
forthe
in
'
ing methyl the
Thus
·than
less
I ..
,
is worthabout an extension of the
ic Stlbsti tution
effect, which is portion comes into play only at
112
3 all the ier
to findings at
occasionally to in
x•esults v1hieh pressure, and
s of the
3
Oompotmd nne leo- solvent Temp. . R
(1./mole/sec.) ence
J!-Brorno- piper benzene
99° 64 .. 5x1o-7
54nitrobenzene dine
D-Bromo-
"
n n1.98x1o-
7
ubenzoni tr ile
acetophenone H u II
o ..
86x1o·7 nJ2-Dhloro ... H It 100°
16 .. 8x10-7
·J05nitrobenzene
J-Dhloro .... 2- !l u n
6x1o-7
Hnitrotoluene
5...Chloro-2- If H 1t
14. 3x1o-7
flnitroanisole
0.-Chloro- tl H It
779x1o-7
Itnitrobenzene
u H If
772xio-7
Hnitro toluene
3-Chloro-1. .. - II t1 2630x1o·7 tl
nitroanisole
]2-Fluoro- J.j.9 ..
5'
2 ..37x1
102nitrobenzene
3,
initro- u u It-3
th 19x1
o
Hfluorobenzene
§-Bromonitrobenzene
(hrs.-1
1
reflux 1590x10- ·
57
.3-Br•omo-4-ni trotoluene ( 106°) n1400x1o·.3
H4-l1romo ... 3-nitrotoluene tl It H n
n u u
o.
7x1
c:r
3 Hu u n 0,.2x1o-3 H
u n n 79x1o-3 n
Br-0
eN
I
3.74
at
of this
Br
OcH~
CN
II
5!~
for the
20.68 It may be seen that the methyl group
(in II) has little effect on the I what 11 ttle :it
features are the ones; the m-rn"'T. an
electronic electron-donor by comparison with
ef'fect small.. This accord with
the assumption that any steric of the cyano group is insignificant ..
supports methyl group on
sterie
effectshould absent in III. Now III reacts than I
II and a reason must in el .,. ... ,,. ... s.. There are two possible
group ( ~ +T) is an electron-wi thdraweJ? and
be that the cross-conjugation illustrated below would activat the eyano group and therefore act as a rat factor.
)
Br
~~a·
y
.,.'cH
rr
~
-Clearly ia
results
the
105
on to support
present finclings. a of' ohloronitrobellzenes
ituents in their 't"eactions with
in 100°. Relevant are
Table 3 , 3-Chloro ...
4-nitro-toluene. and 3-0hloro-4-nitFoanisole. this of
aetivat nitl?o reaction
site the situation more
tuted conrpounds. However, a st
the
effect, reaction dealt with is
steric
f'iable to
obtained
of the reac·&ion site may
to
ectronic effects, s
compoun.ds are clearly in line with those :found in The
as
and s
57
is agreement wtth theseen
~-~~~--- ... this series, unlike A, st
interaction bet'Vveen substituents should. be
Comparison be made within B IV
, and be drawn between the
B the of A~ is series
:f'rom steric
6CH3
NOl.
v
0.730
Br-0
OCH~N02.
[image:137.595.64.521.601.783.2]115
one,
on site, bttt t't'<o<>c'nA
the activat inhibition
of mesome:t"ism.,. It is gene:r•ally
t'lll:'n a nit:ro group about its ring-nitrogen
torce methyl g:x·oup out of the plane of
(
the ring-carbon bond. It may
111. e than tllat this is a result
ions, some
A
on is
( above) ot'
nitro (
On present results
relative
importance ofdi
are
to than it is to
by
seen
to
accountnoted the
VII
02
are:-102 studied the
VIII 0.,1 methanol 116
A
No¥Noa.
C~HsIX
0 .. 573ic results with this compound with that the compound. is rather
work little difference
I was ob two sets results are
ivity
group
the fluoride ion with a metho:xide ion
aou.lrl
reactivity smaller by a
groups may the
but they are <"''T>I!'>nn, the resonance
is
but,
of 13
a
two however, may factor 117
,
ivating a a combination ofeffects is much more
'fhus, (see Table 3)
is five times as
likely
to
vityof than VIII .. is
one also,. Both
in ion of' the
ive in
~~[k~""j'"" Ping
In add it. ion
that of the hypera:onjugat its
on reaction site~ is
it that is to
deaetivat
convenient to
inductive
than a ,m-methyl "
a k
the an
discussed are
in :I>eaeti ...
(IJ()
this
a
rate group should
ethyl
and this should
reactive
IX as eompax•ed with VIII ..
effect the ethyl , both on the nitro
than that of in in
and in
it is mo:l'e
, is that
a at
and
in stabilizat
polar
this factor is of no
the
more
aol vat ion. in between
en" than between VIII
eonelusion as to importance
effect, above, at
2
T
formation of act
the
vary fol'
Compound
.,.. LlV 1
- e:;v:li!
=
2 • .303 RT d/d.P(1og k),8 ce/mole
VII ..
I
31.8 21.8 1 8 42.1
is no
III
VI VII
2
37.9 69.1
by
116
bigger
groups
VII should
is and
hold.
*
seen that D. V 1
the
), obtained
-69 .. 1
XI
119
ivity
that in a in
an substituent
( ~ positive), an
contraction of
that the tuent, the
1.6
v*
1.
s7
by
was
that quinolines
even more so in the
s
electr
O H .•. H.L.J...U. be
*
in b.V
to
:polar• react
the
dissociation the introduction
, to charge
(Hrunmond' a
entirely due to a the transition
postulate, P., t:>s) ..
may
one
a major one ; it
ion substituent
in ivated cornplex..
1 mainly, by
..
this Thusto the conclusion of' subst
be illustratecl
,
k, the ion
1:~ it
at
120
with the t•apreading
ot
charge effeot11 ..•
The values 6 V arerate constant with
of simplicity, in
from the
{see equat
e of change
). For variation
discussion, the
•
rate constant with pressure than 6.V values with the factors in mind, of the
(A, B, 0 and D) is in turn; mean k values and
k_p/k1
'l'ables
at the various pressures are collected the
and kp/k1 are plott in 8 - 11 ..
TABLE .5
Br Br Br
0
QH3
OocH~
CN CN CN
I II I I I
P(bars) kx.1
o
6 ~/k1 1tx106
kp/k1 kx106
1),/k1
1 3 .. 7Lt- 1 3 .. 54 1 20 .. 68 1
500
6 .. 63
1 .. 77 1-t-.. 99 1 .. 41 24 .. 99 1 .. 211000 10.,62 2 ..
84
7 .. 19 2 .. 03 33.12 1.601500 15 .. 02 4 .. 01 10 .. 63
,;.oo
41 .. 80 2,.022000 21.29 .5.69
15 .. 53
4.38 56 .. 19 2.722500 29.85 7 .. 97 20 .. 15
5.69
71.15
3 .. 44
3000 40,.62 10,.85 25.70
7 ..
26
86 .. 984.21
(I) 5·bromo-2-oyanotoluene (II)atmospheric pJL'essuJ?e., Therefore, from the above discussion , the variation with pressure of e constants should comparable.. From Table 5
[image:144.595.71.550.135.632.2]some
reaction
rate constant~ varying the solvent in
the
group,. Solvat
the polarity the solvent is
at a given vary
1
the
tle steric the
increases,
:in the in test
earr out ..
lti/k1 values, manner.
III Table
5,
and ing that the from that for I, itin direction the
b
with
involves
; the
scussed on P .. ti'J ..
essure
I<;_p/k
1 , the too small to befactors that inhibit o-:f' second
cross-conju.gat B atrnospherie .,.,..-,r..,.,.,,..,ivelf
to
to be er
the results
on these
it resonan.ee ..
ion as d.i of'
It 'Nas noted.,
for eyano , that the methoxy
methyl this
to oscillating about a m.ean position, an
would its amplitude
ot
oscillation the incidence of
configuration. This
aoti vating ... .,.~'~~'""'..,.. the cya.no group
the reaction \Vith
possible explanat
to compound I.. This; then
A cho iee betvreen the two
bilities is difficult to
somewhat more contrived.
~--~~~~
-
6
belowtor this
the compounds are plotted
TABLE 6 Br
the second one
the relevant data
and the ~/k
1
values for Fig. 9 ..Br
Br
122
in
0
0
CH30
OCH3.NO~
:rv
P(ba.rs)
kx1d+
~/k1
kx1o4
1
1.99
1 730;oo
97
00 1.331000
6.
2.141500 11 .. 70
2000 1 34 21 20
2500 31 11 .. 21
53
47 15.31 10 .. 79
It can
( is "'""""""'
(Table 5).. From
a.t ions (P. 119) the of
NOa NO;t
v
Ikpk1
kx104 kp/k11 1. 1
1.83 1 .. 94
ih19 3 ..
5.;.01
6.
507.12 1 12 8 .. 11
10 .. 1
72
11 .. 001lt .. 78 1
57
15 .. 69that k at one bar than that for
constant with
[image:147.595.69.524.113.750.2]variation
must be
Sol vat because of
is
group·
area over
whichtor
IVcharge
1
tor
r ..
nitro
( oxygen in nitro
o;vano~ The solvation
greater this ease.
as compared
of
one nitrogen in
V1ould therefore be
a second be
ity considered.
by the increasing to
become more benzene in a to
that above the methoxy gl'oup.
withdrawing ability the nitro g':roup would.
as pressure is increased.
s
impossiblethe eyano group, it account~
comparatively
tor IV th~tn for I.
rate se with
Turning now to compounds V and it is of
, for
to
compare F 9 with 8.. It can seen that variat
with l' of the constants of all compoun<ls
series B are almost rate constants at spheric
vary significantly , while relative
vary a littl are compared
f'ouncl for that
the
faetora 'W ...
B and in series must be vv:r""'"'·"" for .... s f'aetor
mu.st not only explain rate , wrtieh
greater for V provide an explanation
for similar VI
important
between
124
the methyl ~~oup in V or the methoxy group in VI.
The rate constants at atmospheric pressure that the
ni tl"O group in V is forced out of the plane of the benzene
ring (see ea:t>l cliscussion).. !f' the effect of pressure is
progressively to force the nitro group back into the plane of'
the benzene ring\!' the aeeeler•at ef'fect on the rate of V as
compared with II and V as compared with IV may accounted
When VI is it will be reme.mbered that it has
been previously that the met.hoxy group is effectively
bigger than the methyl group~ and therefore the nitro
grou11 out of plane more than does the methyl group. If' this is
so, then the u:rlatteningu effect of pressure liltely to be more effective with VI tha11. with V and the urate increase"
sequence of' B is tentatively accounted f'or.
Now an alternative explanation offerecl for series A f'or
the relatively small increase in rate constant with pressure for compound I I I as compared with compounds I and II, was an
increase in cross-conjugation between the metho:xy gr•oup and the
cyano group. This factor was also one of two possibilities introduced to explain the greater reactivity of VI at
atmos-pheric pressure. (P ,.tiS). now ever, this factor were a major
one, the nitro group could not be displaced far from the plane
of the benzene ring., Furthe:t'"'more, an inel"'ease in pressure would increase eross-eonjn.gation effect and decrease the activating ability o:r the nitro g-.eoup.. s, however, not
the ease and it concluded that the
cross-conjugation :factor, at one bar and so under pressure~ is not
a major one.. Thus it is now that at one bar the
methoxy group has slightly greater effective, aterie deactivating influence than the methyl g:t'~OUp and hence that the rate
as to
eourse predicted
thus in Table
are plotted in F 10.
Br
0
N 01- NOz.
VII
) k.x104 kp/k1
1 02 1
6 ..
31+
14
1 19 .. 53 9 ..
1 51 .. 69 6
~ 104 ~
seen that the
than for
OOlTIPG)Uilld VII it
.~;·~~:.o.u, ~
paper 1 06 ,of tbe d
for
ion
, it woulc:t
results, ion. The
kr:/k1 values
7
VIII
kx104 0 .. 154
0 .. 258
0.368
0 .. 5070 .. 797
1 ..
64
11
1 ..
2 ..
3 .. 17
3.03 19 .. 70
1
of product
the:re may some
However, in :fact
complex, ~u:~e
:to data are th1:•ee compounds
Br
A
NO~
NO~
C2.Hsd+
kp/k10 ..
573
11 .. 061 1 ..
84
1.,88 3.
3 ..
09
5.394.49
7-87 10 ..
7 ..
114
:posit
ring.,
by the introduct in molecule,.
acid, already out of the significantly further out
of' a nitro into
5-COOH
H0CI
NO~
out of plane attribute to buttress-ing of bulky nitro on hydrogen in the
6-position. A similar s been observed
m-dinitro-where nitro groups are out of 107 ..
swne effect
posit to one another are g~ite
11/i th be forced
incn:"ease
are two aetivat
the ion
say, COi11pou:nd
pressure the
sure groups o.f VII a
Since there
i tuents in compound VII the fx~om
spread over a nmeh wider area than increased solvation brought about
more
a the
to
ion site than a J!""'nitro substituent, combined
s of two in
127
Turning no'~;t to compound VIII (see Fig.., 10) , the
at a:ppear to be reasonable explanation. However,
the kinetics of 0 are
as
determined ( i. a .. "the assumed is actual reaction k values),
a tentative explanation may be offered.., The e;x:plana.tion~ ieh is eurnbel"sorne and put :forward with little confidence,
is a.s follows.. the of increase of rate
ant at 1500 - 2000 bars some new effect. not
1500 It be post·u.1ated the u.::r•ucuJ,.,..
red:uction, brought about
in pressure,
may cause tlle nitro groups to be forced into plane the
the methyl group be someviha.t out of
1500 .-. 2000 bars. This would ue1:>m1
of somewhat change in
the
nkp,/k
1 vreaction rate
the initial
pu
curve
one of
compound VIII ..
for VIII for
less
should be
the
IX,
than for
effect
The opposite situation must be sought.
hyperconjugative effect
ible one appears to lie in , for
important.
reaction rates one
bar, was
woulrl tend
form of'
gl"eater early
An in
stabi1ize the more
polar,
more hyperconjugat gt"'ou:p, e. the(
2
ive
for the ethyl
for methyl is
curve
for
as
and this wou1d account the
..,.u. ... nu.~. in F 1 0
tor
compound VIII, asThe effects are in in
methyl gt"oup foreed
the hype:~?conjugative effect be
of plane, readilY behaviour
or
to reaction explanation for
VIII, although superficially sat
'-'~u 1
~Ji
_L~~~1--i~Lf_
--
-~--I 0
~~-+-+~++-~---1-!-~ 1--
-1-I -1-I
· - - 1-[__-r
! - '-·
=·
~J+li
! -
!
-L~l
-+
r -, I
r~--
~ jl. I ftt~T·.
I '!"~==~=·
-- !
-I - - +t1~
!-f-- -1- - -
·
--~ . . . . - · - ·-. · ----~
~H>nr•T•~ing evidence
on similar
P(
1
1
below in series
other
XI
) k.x1o6
3 .. 07
4 ..
69 6 .. 909 ..
13.45 18 .. 55
24 .. 03
8 (see also
more
clearly
, for is not form a
1
are probably best in son
ituted
TABLE 8
kp/k1
1
1 "53
6-04
7 .. 83
I and IV ..
BrO/'
-
'r-o~
0
-06 k:p/k1
1
7.
1.77
10"' 1+6
1 17
1+.48
7 .. 07
I.t-1 ..
9.71
R-Dromoacetophenone, having the rate o:f' the
e behaviour are
of increase
on u at eric
seen from a model
by the
not
constant can of solvat
carbonyl
operative
This
ei'i'ects on
as such ..
It
[image:155.595.71.461.304.548.2]129
smaller increase in rate constant for this compound.
The plot of'
k_p/k
1 for )2-bromobenzo;phenone XII shows a"diaeontinuityu similar to that observecl for cotnpound VIII .. li'or this compound it must that the reactivity is
on the orientation. of the carbonyl group with both benzene rings, and that system is sterically hindered from attaining a ion. It may be that pressure tends to increase coplanarity with greatest success above 1500
bars~ around which pressure the 11discontinuity1
t oacu.ra. It would be of intet•eE~t to whether the
1
1 Ham:raett, ical Organic stryn, ill
Co. 1 New York, 1940, Chaptel"' 7.
Ellis, , Rutherford, Fischer and , J. Ohem ..
Phys .. , ,
176, {1959).
2
3
4
Evans and Polanyi, F Soc.,
.ll,
875~ ( 19 ),ametn.n, ":Physico-chemical s ,
Butterworth's ifie Publications, London, 1
5
6
Reference
4,
P.177 ..
Gurney, "Ionic Processes in
New York, 1 P,. 1
7
~~
Brower, , ~T.A.,c.sJ.A.c. ,
.. , .JlQ, §1, , , (1958) .. (19 ).,8 , J. :Phya. Chem .. , , 977, ( 1925) ..
9 , J,.A.o,.s. t , 2068, (1926) ..
; z. ' j 2 , 1 , (1913 .. ) ..
ana. z. .§1t, ( 1913) ..
10
c
11 and Gill, ~T. Phys.. , 740, ( 1954) .. 12 Korber,
z ..
phys .. Chem., , 212, (1909) ..1 3 ]'ink , Ann. , , 481 , ( 1 8 8 5 ) ..
14.
z
jl ' 151, (1 ) ..15 R er 7 ..
ill
, P .. 1
Co.,,
16 Bogoj 1
g:z
'I 457' ( 1 ) ~17
18 ll'anjung, Z.
19 Brander
20 21
21, ( 1
23
c
, 673'1 ( 1894) ..
, C omrn., Phys.
' , 353, ( 1929 ).
'
(8),F Soc.,,
.2.1,
1684, (19 ). tlaznanLn, Trans .. "'t ; 1475, ( 1953)", (1 )
'
.. 8., , ( 1960) , ' 2L~ 7.
.30 31
32
36
stein, Fischer,'
a, Phys .. R
131
in, 191
, 1960,
a, University of :r-rew z'"'""'"""..._.., ... , 1958.
, ;u,
'
(1953),Inat,,
11 , (1
) •
, Chapter Ohernistryu,
946.
Methods
' 359 , ( 19 25 ) .. ·""'" ... '""'"'", .2§, 166, (1923).
ov.L.Lv.t-·1 M. .. Thesis, University Zealand, 1955 ..
Ref'erenee
4,
104 ..R
4,
P. 1Hnd
Solutiom:;n 1
• "The Chemistry Ilileetrolyte
e:i:nholo. ing Co'll', York, 1950.
37
~l
Dippy ' J ..
c "
1 ( 19 36 ) ' 644 ..,
c.a .. ,
(1934~, 161.,.r .. c .. s..
(193L~11 1888.Lewis,
c,.s ...
~ 1 ), 3l~3. 38 40 41 42 47 50 d) e)ei', Rev ..
'
Roberts, S.~.m1""v"''""
.3290~ ( 1
, Garbi
c.. '
(19 ), 1Chern .. ,
,
lt-20, (1).
'
19'1 t { 1 )'
f (1951)",
Ree,. Chim ..'
l~oble, T and
z
,
J .. A ..o .. s .. ,
t Chem .. R
'
,
273,
(1 ).,Appl ..
,
j, 171, (1)
..
(1
).
'
.r ..
.c.
'
.1.2,
'I 6020, (1