• No results found

Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Report"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Report

Tests Performed on a Federal Signal Corp.

Amplifier, Model GENII-RA Radiometrics Document RP-9351

Test Standards:

CENELEC EN 55032: 2015 CENELEC EN 55035: 2017 IEC 61000-4-2: 2008

IEC 61000-4-3: 2006 +A1:2007 +A2:2010 IEC 61000-4-4: 2012

IEC 61000-4-5: 2014 IEC 61000-4-6: 2013

IEC 61000-4-11: 2004+A1:2017 FCC Part 15 CFR Title 47: 2020 ICES-003: 2019 (Canada)

CENELEC EN 61000-3-2: 2014 & CENELEC EN 61000-3-3: 2013 2014/30/EU EMC Directive

Tests Performed For: Test Facility:

Federal Signal Corp.

2645 Federal Signal Dr.

University Park, IL 60484-3167

Radiometrics Midwest Corporation 12 Devonwood Avenue

Romeoville, IL 60446-1349 (815) 293-0772

Test Completion Date:

December 2, 2020 RP-9351 Revisions:

Rev. Issue Date Revised By

0 January 6, 2021

(2)

Table of Contents

1.0 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA ... 3

2.0 TEST SUMMARY AND RESULTS ... 3

3.0 TEST SPECIFICATIONS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ... 4

4.0 RADIOMETRICS’ TEST FACILITIES ... 5

5.0 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS ... 6

5.1 EUT Description ... 6

5.2 Tested System Configuration ... 8

5.3 Operating Conditions of EUT ... 8

5.4 EUT Modifications ... 9

6.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR IMMUNITY TESTS ... 9

6.1 Minimum Performance Level ... 9

7.0 DEVIATIONS FROM THE TEST SPECIFICATIONS ... 9

8.0 EXCLUSIONS FROM THE TEST SPECIFICATIONS ... 9

9.0 TEST PROCEDURES ... 10

9.1 RF Emissions Measurement Procedures ... 10

9.1.1 Radiated Emission Measurement Procedures ... 10

9.1.2 Conducted Emission Measurement Procedures ... 11

9.1.3 Harmonics and Flicker Test Procedures ... 12

9.2 Immunity Test Procedures ... 12

9.2.1 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test Procedures ... 12

9.2.2 Radiated RF Immunity Test Procedures ... 13

9.2.3 Electrical Fast Transients Test Procedures ... 15

9.2.4 Surge Voltage Immunity Test Procedures ... 16

9.2.5 Conducted RF Immunity Test Procedures ... 18

9.2.6 Voltage Dips and Interruptions Test Procedures ... 18

10.0 CERTIFICATION ... 18

11.0 TEST EQUIPMENT TABLE ... 18

11.1 Test Software ... 19

12.0 TEST SETUP DOCUMENTATION ... 20

13.0 DETAILED TEST RESULTS ... 38

13.1 Immunity Test Results ... 38

13.1.1 Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Immunity Results ... 38

13.1.2 Radiated RF Immunity Test Results ... 39

13.1.3 Electrical Fast Transients Immunity Results ... 40

13.1.4 Surge Immunity Results ... 41

13.1.5 Conducted RF Immunity Results ... 42

13.1.6 Voltage Dips and Interruptions Immunity Results... 42

13.2 Emissions Test Results ... 43

13.2.1 Measurement Instrumentation Uncertainty ... 43

13.2.2 Radiated Emissions Test Results ... 43

13.2.3 Conducted Emissions Test Results ... 45

13.2.4 Harmonics and Flicker Test Results ... 48

14.0 REVISION HISTORY ... 52 This report must not be reproduced (except in full) without the written approval of Radiometrics Midwest Corporation. The Results in this report apply only to the equipment tested.

(3)

1.0 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA Equipment Under Test:

A Federal Signal Corp., Amplifier Model: GENII-RA

Serial Number: RMC-1

This will be referred to as the EUT in this Report

Date EUT Received at Radiometrics: Test Date(s):

September 25, 2020 September 25 thru December 1, 2020

Test Report Written and Authorized By: EUT Checked By:

01/06/2021 Date Joseph Strzelecki

Senior EMC Engineer NARTE EMC-000877-NE

Larry DeeWaard Federal Signal Corp.

Dave B. Jarvis Radiometrics

The above personnel certifies: (1) The EUT had no loss of performance beyond the manufacture’s performance level during the immunity tests. (2) A functional test was performed on the EUT after the immunity tests and no damage was sustained.

Radiometrics’ Test Personnel: Test Partially Witnessed By:

Joseph Strzelecki Senior EMC Engineer Chris E. D’Alessio EMC Technician Dave B. Jarvis EMC Technician

Larry DeeWaard Federal Signal Corp.

2.0 TEST SUMMARY AND RESULTS

The EUT (Equipment Under Test) is a Federal Signal Corp. Amplifier, Model GENII-RA. The detailed test results are presented in a separate section. The following is a summary of the test results.

This report shows the results of the Amplifier. The amplifier was fully tested and found to be compliant.

The amplifier is part of system with a controller. The results of the controller are presented in Radiometrics document RP-9352.

Emissions Tests Results

Environmental Phenomena Frequency Range Standards Test Level Test Result Conducted Emissions, AC Mains 0.15-30 MHz EN 55032

FCC Part 15 ICES-003

Class A Pass

RF Radiated Emissions 30-1000 MHz Class A Pass

Conducted Emissions Ethernet 0.15-30 MHz EN 55032 Class A Pass

Harmonic Current Emissions 0-2 kHz EN 61000-3-2 A Pass

Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker N/A EN 61000-3-3 N/A Pass

(4)

Immunity Tests Results Port Tested

Environmental

Phenomena Test Level Standard

Performance

Criteria Met Test Result

Enclosure ESD 8 kV Air 4 kV Contact 61000-4-2 A Pass

Enclosure RF EM Field 10 V/m; 80-1000 MHz 3 V/m 1000-6000 MHz

61000-4-3 A Pass

AC Power Fast Transients 2.0 kV 5/50 nSec 61000-4-4 A Pass

Power Fast Transients 0.5 kV 5/50 nSec 61000-4-4 A Pass

Signal Lines Fast Transients 1.0 kV 5/50 nSec 61000-4-4 A Pass

Power Surges 1 kV Diff.; 2kV Comm. 61000-4-5 A Pass

Power/Signal RF Conducted 3 V; 0.15-80 MHz 61000-4-6 A Pass

Note 2

Enclosure Magnetic Field N/A 61000-4-8 N/A Note 1

AC Power Voltage Dips and Interruptions

0% 10 mSec.

40% 100 mSec.

70% 500 mSec.

0% 20 mSec.

0% 5 Seconds

61000-4-11 61000-4-11 61000-4-11 61000-4-11 61000-4-11

A A A A B

Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Note 1: Not Required since there are no magnetically sensitive components in the EUT.

Note 2: For the 61000-4-6 test, the test level did not drop below 3 Vrms. This was to show compliance to other standards. The EN 55035 specification drops the required level above 10 MHz.

IEC 17025 Decision Rule:

The declaration of pass or fail is based on the specifications listed above. The declaration of pass or fail did not consider measurement uncertainty.

CE Product-family Test Specifications and Results

Document Date Title Test Results

CENELEC EN 55032

2015 Electromagnetic Compatibility of Multimedia Equipment - Emissions Requirements (CISPR 32)

Complied with All Applicable Tests CENELEC

EN 55035

2017 Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment – Immunity requirements (CISPR 35)

Complied with All Applicable Tests

3.0 TEST SPECIFICATIONS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS

Document Date Title

CENELEC EN 55032

2015 Electromagnetic Compatibility of Multimedia Equipment - Emissions Requirements (CISPR 32)

CENELEC EN 61000-3-2

2014 Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 3: Limits - Section 2: Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current up to and including 16 A per phase)

CENELEC EN 61000-3-3

2013 Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 3: Limits - Section 3:

Limitation of voltage fluctuations and flicker in low-voltage supply systems for equipment with rated current up to and including 16 A FCC

CFR Title 47

2020 Code of Federal Regulations Title 47, Chapter 1, Federal

Communications Commission, Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices ICES-003

Issue 6

2019 Information Technology Equipment (ITE) — Limits and methods of measurement

(5)

Document Date Title ANSI

C63.4-2014

2014 Methods of Measurement of Radio Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz IEC

CISPR 16

2019 Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods; Methods of measurement of disturbance and immunity;

IEC 61000-4-2 2008 Electromagnetic compatibility. Testing and measurement techniques.

Electrostatic discharge immunity test. Basic EMC publication IEC 61000-4-3 2006+

A1:2007, +A2:2010

Electromagnetic compatibility. Testing and measurement techniques.

Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test

IEC 61000-4-4 2012 Electromagnetic compatibility. Testing and measurement techniques.

Electrical fast transient/burst immunity test. Basic EMC publication IEC 61000-4-5 2014 Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Testing and measurement

techniques. Surge immunity test

IEC 61000-4-6 2013 Electromagnetic compatibility. Testing and measurement techniques.

Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by radio-frequency fields IEC 61000-4-11 2004+

A1:2017

Electromagnetic compatibility. Testing and measurement techniques.

Voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations immunity tests

4.0 RADIOMETRICS’ TEST FACILITIES

The results of these tests were obtained at Radiometrics Midwest Corp. in Romeoville, Illinois, USA.

Radiometrics is accredited by A2LA (American Association for Laboratory Accreditation) to conform to ISO/IEC 17025: 2017 "General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories".

Radiometrics’ Lab Code is 121191 and Certification Number is 1495.01. A full list of Radiometrics

capabilities can be accessed on our web site (www.radiomet.com). Radiometrics accreditation status can be verified at A2LA’s web site (www.a2la.org/scopepdf/1495-01.pdf).

The following is a list of shielded enclosures located in Romeoville, Illinois used during the tests:

Chamber A: Is an anechoic chamber that measures 24’ L X 12’ W X 12’ H. The walls and ceiling are fully lined with ferrite absorber tiles. The floor has a 10’ x 10’ section of ferrite absorber tiles located in the center. Panashield of Rowayton, Connecticut manufactured the chamber. The

enclosure is NAMAS certified.

Chamber B: Is a shielded enclosure that measures 20’ L X 12’ W X 8’ H. Erik A. Lindgren & Associates of Chicago, Illinois manufactured the enclosure.

Chamber D: Is a fully anechoic chamber that measures 22’ L X 10’ W X 10’ H. The walls, ceiling and floor are fully lined with ferrite absorber tiles. Braden Shielding Systems of Tulsa, Oklahoma manufactured the chamber.

Chamber E: Is a custom-made anechoic chamber that measures 52’ L X 30’ W X 18’ H. The walls and ceiling are fully lined with RF absorber. Pro-shield of Collinsville, Oklahoma manufactured the chamber.

Test Station F: Is an area that measures approximately 10’ D X 12’ W X 10’ H. The floor and back wall are metal shielded. This area is used for conducted emissions measurements.

Each chamber has a brass-plated, steel ground rod attached via a 6-inch copper braid ground rod. Each test location is equipped with a low-pass power line filter.

(6)

A complete list of the test equipment is provided herein. The calibration due dates are indicated on the equipment list. The equipment is calibrated in accordance with ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 with traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The FCC test site Registration Number is 90897.

The FCC has accepted these sites as test site number 31040/SIT 1300F2. Industry Canada has accepted these sites and assigned Radiometrics a code of 3124A-1.

5.0 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS 5.1 EUT Description

The EUT is a DSP-based audio amplifier. It is intended for public address and general alarm systems. The EUT was in good working condition during the test, with no known defects.

The EUT is connected to a GENII-RC controller box. The controller box processes control inputs from various sources, monitors system faults, generates audio via integrated DSP, and activates broadcasts on connected amplifiers.

The EUT was grounded by the 3rd wire of AC Plug during the tests. The EUT is a Production sample. PCB part number images are below.

(7)
(8)

EUT Circuit Boards EUT Circuit Board Description Part Number

Processor Board 092019700250

Power Board 092018300090

5.2 Tested System Configuration

The system was configured for testing in a typical fashion. The EUT was placed on an 80-cm high, nonconductive test stand. The peripherals were placed on an 80-cm high, nonconductive test stand. The I/O cables and peripherals were unmodified, commercially available products. The excess lengths of the cables were bundled near the center of the cable with the bundles 30 to 40 cm in length. The testing was performed in conditions as close as possible to installed conditions. Wiring was consistent with

manufacturer's recommendations. Support and simulation equipment were remotely located during testing.

Support equipment was not subjected to the test requirements.

Test Setup Configuration List

Item Description Type* Manufacturer Model Number Serial Number

1 Audio amplifier E Federal Signal Corp. GENII-RA RMC-1

2 Controller S Federal Signal Corp. GENII-RA RMC-2

3 Variable Load Box S Federal Signal Corp None RMC-3

4 Digital Input Expansion Board

S Federal Signal Corp P-16DIN-G RMC-4

* Type: E = EUT, S = Support Equipment (not part of tested system);

The following cables were connected to the EUT during the tests.

List of Cables Connected to the Amplifier

QTY Length (m) Cable Description Shielded?

1 1.8 AC Cord to Amplifier No

5 2.0 Beacon and fault Relays, Audio Input, and standby audio At least one of each type of port was populated with wires;

22 gauge unterminated wires were used

No

2 2.0 Audio cables from Amplifier to Load Box No

1 5.0 Ethernet cable from Amplifier to Controller No

1 1.8 RJ11 cable from Amplifier to the expansion board No

5.3 Operating Conditions of EUT

The EUT was in a normal operating mode during the tests. The controller was in constant communication with the external card and amplifier to ensure everything is functioning properly. All circuits were activated during the tests.

A Digital Input expansion board (P-16DIN-G) with a switch was connected to the amplifier. The switch was wired into one of the input channels on the P-16DIN-G board. This was to allow external devices to trigger events. The system was tested with the expansion board continously activating a broadcast tone of 1 kHz.

The audio output was connected to a variable load box.

Mode Description

Active A dedicated controller is in communication with the amplifier.

(9)

5.4 EUT Modifications

The following modifications were made to the EUT in order to comply with the requirements listed in this report: A Fair-Rite products Corp, Part number 0431164281, ferrite was added to the Audio output leads.

6.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR IMMUNITY TESTS

The apparatus shall not become dangerous or unsafe as a result of the application of the required tests.

The performance criteria is classified as follows:

Performance Criterion A: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended. No degradation of

performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer when the apparatus is used as intended. In some cases, the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance.

Performance Criterion B: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended after the test. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer when the apparatus is used as intended. In some cases, the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance. During the test, degradation of performance is, however, allowed. No change of actual operating state or stored data is allowed.

Performance Criterion C: Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the function is self recoverable or can be restored by the operation of the controls.

6.1 Minimum Performance Level

The minimum performance level as specified by the Federal Signal Corp. as follows: Both audio output channels must stay above 90 VAC and outputs must stay at 100V +- 10%. If an output level dropout occurs, the EUT must recover on its own within 10 seconds.

Criterion EUT specific acceptable performance for each Criterion

A The EUT must stay within tolerance during and after the exposure to the immunity signals. It shall remain fully functional during and after the tests.

B The EUT may show a degradation of performance but must return to normal after the exposure to the immunity signals with no user intervention.

C The EUT may show a degradation of performance or loss of function provided it can be restored by the normal operation of the controls, after the exposure to the immunity signals.

7.0 DEVIATIONS FROM THE TEST SPECIFICATIONS There were no deviations from the test specifications.

8.0 EXCLUSIONS FROM THE TEST SPECIFICATIONS There were no exclusions from the test specifications.

References

Related documents

Quality: We measure quality (Q in our formal model) by observing the average number of citations received by a scientist for all the papers he or she published in a given

This study reveals some significant points: (1) The pattern of interaction between the family of former terrorists convict and surrounding communities can be

How the study was conducted The researchers used a 3-D global atmospheric download to predict how the radioactive material download move over earth and a health-effects model to see

How Many Breeding Females are Needed to Produce 40 Male Homozygotes per Week Using a Heterozygous Female x Heterozygous Male Breeding Scheme With 15% Non-Productive Breeders.

As a charity that provides support directly to those who are homeless and on the edge, STAK is committed to... STAK has also seen an increased demand for its

As a conceptual description of the system’s functionality Initially STL file’s data is convert to a relational table then algorithms that realized with SQL Stored Procedure

Table 1 is for estimating wastewater infiltration into soil for septic tank effluent with BOD >30 mg/L or low organic strength wastewater of BOD <30 mg/L and hydraulic

We hy- pothesized that the RD group would show significant losses in terms of phonological processing, phonological awareness, reading fluency, vocabulary, and reading