Final Presentation. Warsaw, 19 January 2011

(1)

Final Presentation

on 'Conducting a survey and an analysis of remunerations in the

civil service as compared to remunerations in other public

administration offices and in other sectors of the economy’

Warsaw, 19 January 2011

The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Social Fund within the framework of the Human Capital Operational Programme (Priority 5, Measure 5.1, Sub-Measure

(2)

This is the Final Report for the project called 'Conducting a survey and

an analysis of remuneration in the civil service as compared to

remuneration in other public administration offices and in other

sectors of the economy’

delivered following a commission by the Chancellery of the Prime Minister under the agreement No DSC/166/10 ID 112/DSC/10;

financed from the project budget ‘Job evaluation and changes in the remuneration system of the

government administration’, co-financed the European Union from the European Social Fund within the framework of the Human Capital Operational Programme (Priority 5, Measure 5.1, Sub-Measure

5.1.1);

a source of valuable information on developing remuneration policy in the civil service;

1587 pages (including 1520 pages of statistical data for 29 functional regions and 57 areas of employment) it presents results of statistical analysis of data on both financial remuneration (i.e. total salary, base salary, regular supplements, bonuses and awards and other components of financial remuneration)

and non-financial remuneration (additional allowances not included in the salary and training expenses) — received by employees on selected positions in the civil service, in other offices of public administration and in private sector of the economy;

the following entities were covered by the survey:

62 — non-business entities (organisations being a part of the civil service and other organisations of the public administration)

31 — business entities (companies); the project presents results for 91 positions;

the list of organisations included in the survey was consulted with and accepted by representatives of the Chancellery of the Prime Minister

(3)

Project Schedule

Schedule of conducting a survey and an analysis of remunerations in the civil service as compared to remunerations in other public administration offices and other sectors of the economy

Stages/actions completed

[cze] = Jun [lip] = Jul [sie] = Aug [wrz] = Sep [paź] = Oct [lis] = Nov [gru] = Dec

Copyright by HRM partners S.A.

|

₃

The project’s duration Stage 1 – drawing up a list of positions and entities Stage 2 – Final Report’s Structure Stage 3 – Database Stage 4 – Sourcing data, conducting a comparative

analysis Stage 5 – Survey close-out Final Report Approval Final Presentation

(4)

Methodology applied

MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS SUPPORT

M5 General M4 Integrating P5 Experienced Expert M3 Senior P4 Expert M2 Linear P3 Independent M1 Supervising T4 Leading P2 Junior T3 Experienced P1 Novice T2 Junior T1 Novice MANAGERIAL POSITIONS SPECIALIST

POSITIONS SUPPORT POSITIONS

DIRECTORS/MANAGERS INDEPENDENT AND SUPPORT POSITIONS

According to the adopted

methodology, the positions

were divided into:

Managerial, where employees achieve goals through managing people and assets they were entrusted with (listed in the M table, which includes five levels of competence labelled from M1 to M5)

Independent, where employees are assessed on the basis of individual work results:

Specialist (listed in the P table, which includes five levels of competence labelled

from P1 to P5);

Support (listed in T table — with four levels of competence, labelled from T1 to T4)

In the civil service:

managerial positions — these include

senior positions in the civil service and middle management positions; they can also include coordinating positions, if they are a part of the managing level in an organisation

specialist positions — these include

coordinating, independent or specialist positions within the civil service

support positions — these include

support positions in the civil service.

(5)

Sample data

93 organisations:

48 civil service organisations

14 organisations from other sectors of public administration

31 business entities

38,364 employees

9,581 employed in the civil service

3,359 employed in other sectors of public administration

25,424 employed in business entities

(6)

Organisations included in the survey

1. ABB 2. Agora

3. ArcelorMittal Poland

4. National Archive in Poznań

5. National Archive in Warsaw 6. Bank Gospodarki Ż_ywnoś_ciowej

7. Bank Pekao 8. BRE Bank 9. Budimex

10. Head Office of the National Health Fund (NFZ) 11. Dalkia

12. Energomontaż-Północ 13. Ernst & Young

14. Fiat Auto Poland 15. Generali Group

16. General Directorate of National Roads and Motorways (GDDKiA)

17. Chief Inspectorate for Environmental Protection 18. Chief Veterinary Inspectorate in Warsaw

19. Central Office of Measures 20. Central Statistical Office (GUS) 21. PZU Group

22. Hellmann

23. Hewitt Associates 24. Hewlett-Packard 25. ING Financial Services

26. Inter Cars

27. Tax Chamber in Gdańsk 28. Tax Chamber in Katowice 29. Tax Chamber in Poznań

30. Tax Chamber in Warsaw 31. Chancellery of the Senate

32. Regional Police Headquarters in Gdańsk 33. Regional Police Headquarters in Cracow 34. Kompania Piwowarska

35. Łódź_{Voivodeship Office}

36. Office of the Marshal for Małopolska 37. Małopolskie Voivodeship Office 38. Masovian Voivodeship Office 39. Ministry of Finance

40. Ministry of Economy

41. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development 42. Ministry of the Interior and Administration 43. Ministry of Justice

44. Nestlé Polska

45. National Health Fund Branch in Katowice 46. Nowa Era

47. Regional Office of Measures in Gdańsk 48. Regional Office of Measures in Katowice 49. Orange

50. PHOENIX Pharma Polska

(7)

Organisations included in the survey

51. The First Tax Office in Gdynia 52. PKO Bank Polski

53. Polimex-Mostostal

54. Pomeranian Voivodeship Office in Gdańsk 55. PRESSPUBLICA

56. District Prosecutor’s Office in Cracow 57. Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa

58. Raben

59. Regional Court in Warsaw 60. Silesian Voivodeship Office 61. Telekomunikacja Polska

62. Office of Electronic Communications in Warsaw 63. Tax Inspection Office in Gdańsk

64. Tax Inspection Office in Poznań

65. Tax Inspection Office in Warsaw 66. Office of the Marshall in Łódź

67. Office of the Marshall in Poznań

68. Tax Office for Łódź-Widzew 69. Tax Office in Sosnowiec 70. Statistical Office in Katowice 71. Statistical Office in Poznań

72. Statistical Office in Warsaw 73. Public Procurement Office 74. Wielkopolskie Voivodeship Office

75. Voivodeship Sanitary and Epidemiological Station in Poznań

76. Voivodeship Sanitary and Epidemiological Station in Cracow 77. Voivodeship Pharmaceutical Inspectorate in Łódź

78. Voivodeship Pharmaceutical Inspectorate in Poznań

79. Voivodeship Pharmaceutical Inspectorate in Warsaw 80. Voivodeship Construction Supervision Inspectorate in Warsaw

81. Voivodeship InspectorateforEnvironmental Protection in Cracow

82. Voivodeship Inspectorate for Environmental Protection in Poznań

83. Voivodeship Inspectorate of Road Transport in Gdań_sk

84. Voivodeship Inspectorate of Road Transport in Katowice

85. Voivodeship Veterinary Inspectorate in Gdańsk 86. Voivodeship Veterinary Inspectorate in Katowice 87. Voivodeship Veterinary Inspectorate in Łódź

88. Wrigley Poland

89. Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne

90. Headquarters of the Social Insurance Institution (ZUS) 91. Social Insurance Institution Division in Gdań_sk

92. Social Insurance Institution Division in Cracow 93. Social Insurance Institution Division in Łódź

(8)

Conclusions of

the Survey

(9)

pyright by HRM partners S.A

Salaries' competitiveness analysis — whole sample

Base salaries (CS/total) CS median _{total median}

120% 100% 80% 60% 85% 87% 85% 70% 81% 75% _73% 49% 75% 66% 58% 54% 75% 40% 31% 20% 0% T1 T2 T3 T4 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

Total salaries (CS/total) CS median _{total median}

120% 100% 80% 104% _101% 91% 74% 95% 87% 82% 78% 89% 80% 74% 68% 77% 60% 40% 41% 20% 0% T1 T2 T3 T4 P1 Co P2 P3 P4 P5 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

|

9

(10)

pyright by HRM partners S.A

Analysis of competitiveness of base salaries

Base salaries (CS/other public admin.) CS median _{other public admin. median}

140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 116% 104% 95% 80% 83% 90% 81% 63% 95% 89% 94% 111% 96% 40% 20% 0% T1 T2 T3 T4 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

Base salaries (CS/business entities) CS median _{business entities median}

120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 83% 85% 78% 56% 79% 71% 55% 39% 26% 71% 54% 44% 35% 25% 0% T1 T2 T3 Co T4 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

|

10

(11)

Copyright by HRM partners S.A

|

₁

Analysis of competitiveness of total salaries

total salaries (CS/other public admin.) CS median _{other public admin. median} 140% 120% 100% 80% 12 2% 113% 100% 81% 92% 97% 96% 93% 93% 99% 99% 99% 113% 60% 40% 20% 0% T1 T2 T3 T4 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

total salaries (CS/business entities) CS median business entities median 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 105% 100% 87% 63% 95% 84% 70% 65% 35% 86% 69% 57% 42% 33% 20% 0% T1 T2 T3 T4 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 1

Final Presentation. Warsaw, 19 January 2011