• No results found

Array Based Identification of Species of the Genera Abiotrophia, Enterococcus, Granulicatella, and Streptococcus

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Array Based Identification of Species of the Genera Abiotrophia, Enterococcus, Granulicatella, and Streptococcus"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

0095-1137/06/$08.00

0

doi:10.1128/JCM.01712-06

Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Array-Based Identification of Species of the Genera

Abiotrophia

,

Enterococcus

,

Granulicatella

, and

Streptococcus

Sheng Kai Tung,

1

Lee Jene Teng,

2

Mario Vaneechoutte,

3

Hung Mo Chen,

4

and Tsung Chain Chang

1

*

Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, School of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan,

Taiwan, Republic of China

1

; School of Medical Technology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei,

Taiwan, Republic of China

2

; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology,

Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

3

; and Division of Clinical Microbiology,

Department of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan,

Taiwan, Republic of China

4

Received 18 August 2006/Returned for modification 25 September 2006/Accepted 13 October 2006

Some species of enterococci and streptococci are difficult to differentiate by phenotypic traits. The feasibility

of using an oligonucleotide array for identification of 11 viridans group streptococci was previously established.

The aim of this study was to expand the array to identify species of

Abiotrophia

(1 species),

Enterococcus

(18

species),

Granulicatella

(3 species), and

Streptococcus

(31 species and 6 subspecies). The method consisted of

PCR amplification of the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer (ITS) regions, followed by hybridization of the

digoxigenin-labeled PCR products to a panel of oligonucleotide probes (16- to 30-mers) immobilized on a nylon

membrane. Probes could be divided into three categories: species specific, group specific, and supplemental

probes. All probes were designed either from the ITS regions or from the 3

ends of the 16S rRNA genes. A

collection of 312 target strains (162 reference strains and 150 clinical isolates) and 73 nontarget strains was

identified by the array. Most clinical isolates were isolated from blood cultures or deep abscesses, and only

those strains having excellent species identification with the Rapid ID 32 STREP system (bioMe

´rieux Vitek,

Taipei, Taiwan) were used for array testing. The test sensitivity and specificity of the array were 100% (312/312)

and 98.6% (72/73), respectively. The whole procedure of array hybridization took about 8 h, starting from

isolated colonies, and the hybridization patterns could be read by the naked eye. The oligonucleotide array is

accurate for identification of the above microorganisms and could be used as a reliable alternative to

phenotypic identification methods.

Enterococci, nutritionally variant streptococci, most of

which have been allocated to the genera

Abiotrophia

and

Granulicatella

, and streptococci are gram-positive and

cata-lase-negative bacteria. Although many species of the above

genera are commensals of the human body, some of them

cause local or systemic infections, including subacute

endocar-ditis, bacteremia, meningitis, pneumonia, soft-tissue infections,

and eye infections (15, 22, 41, 49). Sherman (46) proposed a

scheme for dividing the streptococci into four categories: the

pyogenic division, the viridans division, the lactic division, and

the enterococci. No single system of phenotypic identification

suffices for the differentiation of this heterogeneous group of

organisms. Instead, classification depends on a combination of

features, including patterns of hemolysis on blood agar plates,

antigenic composition, growth characteristics, and biochemical

reactions (15, 41). Accurate identification of these bacteria

would be useful for understanding the pathogenesis of

infec-tions and the epidemiology of the increasing antibiotic

resis-tance among some of these microorganisms (50).

In clinical laboratories, phenotypic test kits, such as the

Rapid ID 32 STREP system (bioMe

´rieux Vitek, Taipei,

Tai-wan), the API 20 STREP system (bioMe

´rieux Vitek), or the

Vitek GPI card (bioMe

´rieux Vitek), are commonly used for

identification of enterococci, streptococci, and related bacteria

(16, 23, 28). The inherent problem of the culture-based

iden-tification of these microorganisms is the large number of

spe-cies relative to the limited number of biochemical traits, the

poor reproducibility of some tests (4, 41), the variability of

some traits within species (6, 24, 41), and the lack of sufficient

phenotypic data on more recently described species. The last

problem applies to species such as

Streptococcus australis

,

Streptococcus cristatus

,

Streptococcus infantarius

subspecies

in-fantarius

,

Streptococcus infantis

,

Streptococcus gallolyticus

, and

Streptococcus lutetiensis

(38, 44).

A variety of molecular methods have been developed for

identification of strains of enterococci, viridans group

strepto-cocci, and streptococci to the species level. The targets used for

molecular diagnosis include genes encoding rRNA (6, 10, 26,

27), the beta subunit of RNA polymerase (

rpoB

) (14), the

D

-alanine:

D

-alanine ligase (18), the RNA subunit of RNase P

(

rnpB

) (25), the elongation factor (

tuf

) (36), the

manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase (

sodA

) (37, 38), the heat

shock proteins (

groESL

) (51), and the tRNA gene intergenic

spacer (2, 3, 12). Recently, nonhemolytic streptococci were

successfully identified by phylogenetic sequence analysis of

four housekeeping genes (

ddl

,

gdh

,

rpoB

, and

sodA

) (24).

Cor-rect identification of catalase-negative gram-positive cocci is to

some extent achievable by sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical

Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, School of Medicine, National

Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan,

Re-public of China. Phone: 886-6-2353535, ext. 5790. Fax: 886-6-2363956.

E-mail: [email protected].

† Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm

.asm.org/.

Published ahead of print on 25 October 2006.

4414

on May 16, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(2)

(6, 27). However, there are two problems with this approach.

First, the method does not allow differentiation of

Streptococ-cus mitis

,

Streptococcus oralis

, and

Streptococcus pneumoniae

because of significant sequence conservation of the 16S rRNA

genes in this group of bacteria (6, 24). Second, many sequences

in the public databases are mislabeled, either because of

in-correct identification on the source strain or because of

non-recorded revised classification of the strain subsequent to

de-position of the sequence (24).

[image:2.585.48.538.83.619.2]

The 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer (ITS) has been

TABLE 1. Reference strains and clinical isolates used in this study

Species Reference strain(s)a No. of

clinical isolates

Total no. of strains

Enterococcus

E. avium BCRC 10801T, CCUG 34661, 44888 4 7

E. casseliflavus ATCC 12755, 12817, CCUG 18657T 7 10

E. cecorum ATCC 43198T

, BAA150, CCUG 38939 0 3

E. columbae CCUG 27894T 0 1

E. dispar CCUG 33309T, 37857 0 2

E. durans ATCC 19432T, CCUG 46232, 37858, 44816, LMG 16886 1 6 E. faecalis ATCC 19433T

, 27332 13 15

E. faecium ATCC 19434T, CCUG 37851, 46070 11 14

E. flavescens CCUG 30567T, 30568, 30569 0 3

E. gallinarum ATCC 49573T, CCUG 29831, 34517 6 9

E. gilvus CCUG 45553T

, LMG 13600 0 2

E. hirae ATCC 8043T, BCRC 11547, 12496 3 6

E. mundtii ATCC 43186T, LMG 12308 0 2

E. pallens CCUG 45554T 0 1

E. pseudoavium CCUG 33310T

, 44888 0 2

E. raffinosus CCUG 29292T, 37864, 37865 0 3

E. saccharolyticus CCUG 33311T, NCIMB 702609 0 2

E. villorum CCUG 45025T, LMG 19177 0 2

Streptococcus

S. agalactiae ATCC 13813T 13 14

S. alactolyticus BCRC 14738T, CCUG 41502, 41503 0 3

S. anginosus ATCC 33397T, 700231 5 7

S. australis CCUG 45919T

, 45974, 45975 0 3

S. bovis ATCC 33317T, CCUG 4214 0 2

S. canis BCRC 14753T, CCUG 27660 0 2

S. constellatus ATCC 27513T, 27823 5 7

S. cristatus CCUG 33481T

, 30424, 35233 0 3

S. downei BCRC 14752T 0 1

S. dysgalactiaesubsp.equisimilis ATCC 9542, 35666, CCUG 27483, 27479 7 11 S. equisubsp. zooepidemicus BCRC 14756T, 15414, CCUG 43890 0 3 S. gallolyticussubsp. gallolyticus ATCC 43143T

, CCUG 35224, 46101, 46667 5b

9 S. gallolyticussubsp. macedonicus CCUG 39970T, 33369, 43003 0 3 S. gallolyticussubsp. pasteurianus ATCC 43144T, CCUG 19454, 35885, 46034, 46150 7b 12

S. gordonii ATCC 35105T, 49818 1 3

S. infantariussubsp.infantarius ATCC BAA102T

, CCUG 43820, 43821, 44960, 47548 0 5

S. infantis CCUG 39817T, 39818, 39821 0 3

S. iniae BCRC 14744T, CCUG 27623 0 2

S. intermedius ATCC 27335T 3 4

S. lutetiensis CCUG 43822T

, 38926, 43823 0 3

S. mitis ATCC 49456T, 15910, 15914 5 8

S. mutans BCRC 15255, 15256, CCUG 35254 5 8

S. oralis ATCC 35037T, 9811, 15914, 55229, 700233, 700234 6 12 S. parasanguinis ATCC 15912T

, 15909 4 6

S. parauberis LMG 12174 0 1

S. pneumoniae ATCC 33400T, 6301, 27336, 49619 9 13

S. porcinus BCRC 14751T, CCUG 7982, 41363 0 3

S. pyogenes ATCC 14289T

, 12344 8 10

S. ratti CCUG 27641T, 27642, BCRC 15255, 15256 0 4

S. salivarius ATCC 7073T, 13419, 25975, CCUG 32749B 6 10

S. sanguinis ATCC 10556T, 49295, 49296 3 6

S. sobrinus BCRC 14757T

, CCUG 21019, 35254 0 3

S. suis BCRC 14757T, CCUG 42755, 42756 0 3

S. thermophilus BCRC 13869T, ATCC 15910, CCUG 35458 0 3

S. uberis ATCC 19436T, 13386, 700407 1 4

S. urinalis CCUG 41590T

, 41825 0 2

S. vestibularis CCUG 24893T, 32749 0 2

Nutritionally variant streptococci

Abiotrophia defectiva ATCC 49176T, CCUG 27805 5 7

Granulicatella

G. adiacens ATCC 49175T, CCUG 27811, 44406, 44407, 44408 7 12

G. balaenopterae CCUG 37380T 0 1

G. elegans CCUG 38949T, 13462, 26024, 27554 0 4

Total 150 312

aATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.; BCRC, Bioresources Collection and Research Center, Taiwan; CCUG, Culture Collection of the University of Go¨teborg, Sweden; LMG, Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, Belgium; NCIMB, The National Collection of Industrial, Marine and Food Bacteria, United Kingdom. A total of 162 reference strains were used.

bThree biotypes (I, II.1, and II.2) are recognized by the Rapid ID 32 STREP system.S. bovisbiotypes I and II.2 were renamedS. gallolyticussubsp.gallolyticusand S. gallolyticussubsp.pasteurianus, respectively (44).

on May 16, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(3)

suggested as a good candidate for bacterial identification and

strain typing (8, 19, 21, 40). The ITS region is found to have a

high degree of sequence and length variation at both the genus

and species levels (21, 30, 55). Recently, DNA array

technol-ogy was found to be a useful tool to identify (or detect) a wide

variety of microorganisms (7, 17, 29, 34, 43, 53, 54). In our

previous study, the feasibility of using an oligonucleotide array

to identify 11 species of viridans group streptococci was

estab-lished (9). This study aimed to expand the results of the array

technique to cover a more comprehensive spectrum including

53 species and 6 subspecies of

Abiotrophia

,

Enterococcus

,

Granulicatella

, and

Streptococcus

.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.A collection of 312 target strains (162 reference strains and 150 clinical isolates) was analyzed (Table 1). Reference strains were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.), the Biore-sources Collection and Research Center (BCRC, Hsinchu, Taiwan), and the Culture Collection of the University of Go¨teborg (CCUG, Go¨teborg, Sweden). Clinical isolates were obtained from the National Taiwan University Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan), the National Cheng Kung University Medical Center (Tainan, Taiwan), and the Ghent University Hospital (Ghent, Belgium). Most clinical isolates were isolated from blood cultures or deep abscesses and identified to the species level with the Rapid ID 32 STREP system. To avoid ambiguous identities of clinical isolates, only those strains having excellent species identification ac-cording to the criteria of the Rapid ID 32 STREP system were used for array testing. In addition, species names of clinical isolates of viridans group strepto-cocci were verified by ITS sequence analysis as previously described (8). In addition, a total of 73 nontarget strains (belonging to 51 species other than the species covered by the DNA array) were used for a specificity test of the array (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). All strains were cultured on sheep blood agar, incubated at 35°C for 24 to 48 h, and then used for DNA extraction. Strains ofAbiotrophiaandGranulicatellawere cultured on chocolate agar.

DNA preparation.The boiling method was used to extract DNA from bacteria (31). Briefly, one to several colonies of pure cultures were suspended in 50␮l of sterilized water, heated at 100°C for 15 min in a heating block, and centrifuged in a microcentrofuge (6,000⫻g; 10 min). The supernatant containing bacterial DNA was stored at⫺20°C for further use.

Database of oligonucleotide probes.A total of 88 oligonucleotide probes (16-to 30-mers) (Table 2) were used (16-to construct an oligonucleotide database (16-to identify the bacteria listed in Table 1. Most probes were designed from the ITS regions, except for five that were based on the sequences of the 3⬘ends of 16S rRNA genes. Reference sequences extracted from GenBank (Table 1) were confirmed by at least one sequence of another reference strain of the same species in the database. If an ITS sequence was determined in this study and used for probe design, the sequence was also confirmed by using the ITS sequence of a second reference strain of the same species, except for a few species that had only one strain in our collection (Table 1).

Alignments of the ITS sequences of different species were performed by using the PrettyBox algorithm of the Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group package (version 10.3; Accelrys Inc., San Diego, Calif.), and areas displaying sequence divergence among species were used for probe synthesis. The designed probes were checked for internal repeats, self-biding, secondary structure, and GC content by using the software Vector NTI (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) and screened against the databases of the National Center for Biotech-nology Information for homology with other bacterial sequences using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool). Fifteen, ten, or five additional bases of thymine were added to the 3⬘(or 5⬘) ends of probes that hadTmvalues less than 37°C, 45°C, or 50°C, respectively (7) (Table 2). Some probes used for identifi-cation of viridans group streptococci were reported previously (9); however, many probes were newly designed or modified to identify several additional species in this group and to meet the change of hybridization stringency used in this study (Table 2).

One probe or multiple probes were designed to identify a single species, depending on the availability of divergent sequences in the ITS regions (Table 2). The 88 probes could be divided into 3 categories: species specific, group specific (i.e., a probe shared by several species), and supplemental probe (i.e., a probe used to differentiate between genetically related streptococci). Supplemental probes were either designed from the ITS regions or from the 3⬘ends of the 16S

rRNA genes. A probe based on a conserved sequence (5⬘-GTCGTAACAAGG TAGCCGTA-3⬘) at the 3⬘end of the 16S rRNA gene (GenBank accession no. AB023575) was used as a positive control probe. In addition, the digoxigenin-labeled reverse primer 6R (5⬘-dig-GGGTTYCCCCRTTCRGAAAT-3⬘; Y⫽C or T, and R⫽A or G), used to amplify the ITS region, was spotted on the array and used as a position marker after hybridization (Fig. 1 and 2).

Fabrication of oligonucleotide arrays.The array (0.9 by 1.1 cm) contained 117 dots (9⫻13 dots), including 88 dots for species (or subspecies) identification, 1 dot for a positive control (probe code PC), 8 dots for negative controls (probe code NC, tracking dye only), and 20 dots (probe code M) for position markers (Fig. 1). The oligonucleotide probes were diluted 1:1 (final concentration, 10

␮M) with a tracking dye solution, drawn into wells of 96-well microtiter plates, and spotted onto positively charged nylon membranes (Roche, Mannheim, Ger-many) as described previously (9). The arrays were fabricated with an automatic arrayer (SR-A300; Ezspot, Taipei, Taiwan) by using a solid pin (diameter, 400

␮m). Probes on the array were divided by position markers into four areas. Probes in the upper left, upper right, and lower left corner were used for identification of species of nutritionally variant streptococci, enterococci, and streptococci, respectively. The lower right corner contained supplemental probes that helped group-specific probes to differentiate some genetically related strep-tococci (Fig. 1).

Amplification of the ITS regions for hybridization.The bacterium-specific universal primers 13 BF (5⬘-GTGAATACGTTCCCGGGCCT-3⬘) and 6R (5⬘ dig-GGGTTYCCCCRTTCRGAAAT3⬘) (Y⫽C or T, and R⫽A or G) (39) were used to amplify a DNA fragment that encompassed a small portion of the 16S rRNA gene, the ITS, and a small portion of the 23S rRNA gene. The reverse primer 6R was labeled with a digoxigenin molecule at its 5⬘end. PCR was carried out as described previously (9), except that digoxigen11-dUTP was not in-cluded in the PCR mixture.

Hybridization procedures.Unless otherwise indicated, the hybridization pro-cedures were carried out at room temperature in an oven with a shaking speed of 60 rpm. All reagents except buffers were included in the DIG nucleic acid detection kit (Roche). Each array was prehybridized for 2 h with 1 ml of hybrid-ization solution (5⫻SSC [1⫻SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate], 1% [wt/vol] blocking reagent, 0.1%N-laurylsarcosine, 0.02% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) in an individual well of a 12-well cell culture plate. The digoxi-genin-labeled PCR product amplified from an isolate was heated on a 100°C heating block for 5 min and immediately cooled in an ice bath. Ten microliters of the denatured PCR product of the test organism was diluted with 0.5 ml of hybridization solution and added to each well. Hybridization was carried out at 45°C for 90 min. The array was then given three washes (5 min each) in 1 ml of washing buffer (2⫻SSC, 0.1% SDS) and one wash (1 min) in 1 ml of a second washing buffer (0.5⫻SSC, 0.1% SDS). The array was then blocked with 1% blocking solution supplied in the DIG nucleic acid detection kit (Roche), incu-bated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated sheep antidigoxigenin antibodies and then with the substrates of alkaline phosphatase as described previously (9). The hybridized chip was air-dried, and the image of the hybridization pattern was processed by a high-resolution scanner (Powerlook 3000; Umax, Taipei, Taiwan). The hybridized spot (diameter, 400␮m), displaying a blue color on a white nylon membrane, could be easily recognized by the naked eye.

Identification of strains by array hybridization.A strain was identified as one of the species (or subspecies) listed in Table 1 when the probe (or all probes) specified for that species was hybridized (Table 2). Unless otherwise specified, hybridization signals produced by supplemental probes located in the lower right corner of the array were ignored. Some species were identified by their unique hybridization patterns, produced by group-specific or group-specific and supple-mental probes, as indicated in Table 2. Supplesupple-mental probes were used to differentiate several genetically related streptococci; they had no use for identi-fication of enterococci and nutritionally variant streptococci.

Discrepant analysis.When a strain produced discrepant identification by the array, the near-complete-length 16S rRNA gene of the strain was amplified by PCR and sequenced for species clarification. To amplify the near-complete-length 16S rRNA gene by PCR, the primer pair of 8FPL (5⬘-GTTTGATCCTG GCTCAG-3⬘) and 1492RPL (5⬘-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3⬘) was used (39). PCR products were purified by a PCR-M Clean Up kit (Viogene, Taipei, Taiwan) and sequenced in both directions by using the above two primers and an additional primer, 1055r (5⬘-CACGAGCTGACGACAGCCAT-3⬘) with the BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Taipei, Taiwan) and the ABI 377 sequencing system (Applied Biosystems). The determined sequences were compared to known sequences of 16S rRNA genes in the data-bases of the National Center for Biotechnology Information using the BLASTN algorithm. The following criteria were used for identification of a strain to the genus or species level by 16S rRNA gene sequencing: (i) when the comparison of

on May 16, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(4)
[image:4.585.42.542.80.716.2]

TABLE 2. Oligonucleotide probes used in this study

Microorganism

Probe

Code Sequence (5⬘–3⬘)a Length

(bp) Tm(°C) Location

b GenBank

accession no.

Enterococcus

E. avium Eav TACAGAAACAATTTTAAACAA(T) 21 40.3 140–160 AY351315 E. casseliflavus/E. flavescens Ecasc GAGTTGAAATGTTAAAAGAG(T) 20 38.4 128–147 DQ204549 E. cecorum Ecec1 TGCTTTATTATTTAAAAGATCTGA(T) 24 45.7 246–269 DQ217843

Ecec2 ATATTGAAAAGTAATACAAAAAAAC(T) 25 44.2 182–206 DQ217843

E. columbae Ecol1 GAAGAGAAACATCAATTAATAAACCG(T) 26 52.1 92–117 DQ204548

Ecol2 ACAGGWTTTGCTTTTGTTCA(T) 20 47.4 22–41 DQ204548

E. dispar Edi1 CTGGATACTTGAAGAAAAGAATCAAA(T) 26 52.5 91–116 DQ204544

Edi2 TCTTGAGTAAGCTTCTATC(T) 19 35.3 172–190 DQ204544

Edi3 GAAGAACTGCTCAAAACCAGACC(T) 23 53.8 195–217 DQ204544

E. durans Edu1 TGACATTAGAGGATACTCTCAAGAGAAT(T) 28 52.6 93–120 X87178z

Edu2 TAATTGAAGAGTCAGGTTATGACTTTGACA(T) 30 57.1 68–97 X87178

E. faecium Efm1 TTTTATGAGACGATCGAT(T) 18 39.3 204–221 AY351321

Efm2 TCTTGATCTAACTTCTAT(T) 18 28.6 287–304 AY351321

E. faecalis Efs1 TATTTATTGATTAACCTTCT(T) 20 35.8 164–183 AY351322

Efs2 AAGAAGTGATCAAGACCCA(T) 19 43.6 192–210 AY351322

E. gallinarum Egal GAGTGGACAAGTTAAAGA(T) 18 35.5 125–142 DQ204550 E. gilvus Egi1 GAAACAAAATGTTAAACAAAC(T) 21 41.6 112–132 DQ204551 E. hirae Ehi1 TTTGTTTTTCACTTTG(T) 18 37.1 28–45 X87184

Ehi2 CTCAAAGATATATTTTTG(T) 20 36.0 65–84 X87184

E. mundtii Emut (T)TACACACGTTTGTCGATACTT 21 44.9 21–41 DQ204542 E. pallens Epal1 (T)GTGACAGCAATGTTGCCTAGCG 22 57.2 16–37 DQ204541

Epal2 TACAGAAAATAAACAAACAAAC(T) 22 41.8 122–143 DQ204541

Epal3 GAAGAGAAGATCAAGAACCAACC(T) 23 50.6 218–240 DQ204541

E. pseudoavium Eps1 TCGCTCATGAAAGTTAGTAAG(T) 21 44.5 199–209 DQ204540

Eps2 ATTACTAACGGAAATGATCG(T) 20 48.2 182–201 DQ204540

E. raffinosus Era CAGAAACACATTTTTTTAAA(T) 20 40.3 112–131 DQ204533 E. saccharolyticus Esac TTCTTGATAAAACTTCT(T) 17 29.5 168–184 DQ204538 E. villorums Evi1 GGATAGAAATTCATTTTTCTACGCA(T) 25 53.1 92–116 DQ204537

Evi2 TTTAGTTGGTTTTGATATGAGAC(T) 23 45.4 117–139 DQ204537

Streptococcus

S. agalactiae Saga (T)GGAAACCTGCCATTTGCGTCTT 22 59.0 9–30 AY347539 S. anginosus Sang1d

AGAATCCTACTGAACTTAATAAAGAAGTGA(T) 30 53.0 137–166 AY347541

Sang2 AACCGTCTCTTACTATCCTAA(T) 21 42.2 269–289 AY347541

S. australis Sau1 (T)ATCACCAAGGATGAACATT 19 43.3 137–155 DQ204552 S. alactolyticus Sala (T)GGTCAATAAGACCAAA 16 33.1 251–266 AY353082

Salbec

ACGTTTGGAGTATTGTT(T) 17 35.7 19–35 AY347544

S. bovis Salbec

ACGTTTGGAGTATTGTT(T) 17 35.7 19–35 AY347544

Sbecc CCACGATTCAAGAAATTGAATTGT(T) 24 54.1 183–206 AY347544

S. canis Scan (T)CTGTAAGTATTAAAGAGTTTTTTCTA 26 44.1 237–262 DQ204523 S. constellatus Scon1d

ATCTAGGATGCAAAGAAATGAGA(T) 23 49.5 132–154 AY347545

Scon2 TTGTTCAACTAGATAAGATAGGATA(T) 25 44.5 158–182 AY347545

S. cristatus Scri GGATAGTGGAAACTATTCTAAAC(T) 23 43.8 258–280 DQ204522 S. downei Sdow1 TTCTTAGGGCAGTCATCTAAATCACAA(T) 27 56.6 73–99 DQ204520

Sdow2 TTAGCCAAAGTGGTTAATAGAAGTAC(T) 26 50.1 120–145 DQ204520

S. dysgalactiaesubsp.equisimilis Sdyeq (T)TGTGAATAATCAAGAGTT 18 32.9 239–256 DQ204519 S. equisubsp. zooepidemicus Sequi AACGCTGTGATAACGAGTTTAAA(T) 23 50.7 573–595 DQ204517 S. gallolyticussubsp. gallolyticus Sgalgmc (T)ACGTTTGGGAAGTCTTG 17 41.9 20–36 DQ204512

S16STe,f

AGGTGGGATAGATGATT(T) 17 36.9 17–33 DQ204553

S. gallolyticussubsp. macedonicus Sgalgmc

(T)ACGTTTGGGAAGTCTTG 17 41.9 20–36 DQ204512

S16SCe,f AGGTGGGATAGATGATT(T) 17 36.9 16–32 DQ204555

S. gallolyticussubsp. pasteurianus Sgalp (T)AAGATTCAAAGTGATTGTC 19 37.8 138–156 DQ204506 S. gordonii Sgor1d

GAAGTTCCAAACTAGTCCATTG(T) 22 47.6 136–157 AY353081

Sgor2 AATGCACGATGGAGTC(T) 16 39.5 15–30 AY353081

S. infantariussubsp.infantarius Sinfcolc ACGTTTGGGTATTGTTTA(T)AT 18 39.9 19–36 DQ204502

Sinfsalc ATGAGTTAGGTCGAAAGGCC(T) 20 50.0 246–265 DQ204499

S. infantis Smgc

TAAGGAACTGCACATTGGTC(T) 20 47.4 8–27 AY347551

Sinf1e,f

AGGTAACCATTTGGAGCCAG(T) 20 50.8 1419–1438 AY485603

S. iniae Sini1 TCCATAGACAAGGAAGTCTCTAAA(T) 25 49.7 369–393 DQ204504

Sini2 ACAAGGAAGTCTCTAAAATACGTGAAG(T) 28 50.4 295–322 DQ204504

S. intermedius Sinte1d

AGGATATGGAATTCACCTTTAGTTG(T) 25 52.0 132–156 AY347549

Sinte2d

TTTAGTTGATGATATCCTAAAGTAG(T) 25 44.4 149–173 AY347549

S. mitis Smgc TAAGGAACTGCACATTGGTC(T) 20 47.4 8–27 AY347551

Smgmo1e,f AGGTAACCTTTTAGGAGCCA(T) 19 47.7 1436–1454 AF003930

Smgmp1e

TAGTATTAATAAGAGTTTAT(T) 20 27.9 208–227 AY347550

S. lutetiensis Sbecc

CCACGATTCAAGAAATTGAATTGT(T) 24 54.1 183–206 AY347544

Sinfcolc ACGTTTGGGTATTGTTTA(T) 18 39.9 19–36 DQ204502

S. mutans Smut1 (T)GGATAGGTTAAGTATCCTAGAGATGG 26 50.5 269–294 AE014133

Smut2 GAATAGCTAGTAAAAGCCCTATAGC(T) 25 49.4 308–332 AE014133

S. oralis Smgc

TAAGGAACTGCACATTGGTC(T) 20 47.4 8–27 AY347551

Smgmo1e,f AGGTAACCTTTTAGGAGCCA(T) 19 47.7 1436–1454 AF003930

Smgor1e TAGTATTAAAAGAGTTTAT(T) 19 27.7 207–225 AY347551

S. parasanguinis Sparasan TTTAGGTCGCAAGACCA(T) 17 43.8 226–242 AY351320 S. parauberis Sparaub GGTCTTATTAAAGTAATGAG(T) 20 35.4 48–67 AF255656 S. pneumoniae Smgc TAAGGAACTGCACATTGGTC(T) 20 47.4 8–27 AY347551

Smgmp1e TAGTATTAATAAGAGTTTAT(T) 20 27.9 208–227 AY347550

Smgp1e,f

AGGTAACCGTAAGGAGCCA(T) 20 48.9 1436–1455 AF003930

Continued on following page

on May 16, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(5)

the determined sequence with a best-scoring reference sequence of a classified species yielded an identity ofⱖ99%, the unknown isolate was assigned to that species; and (ii) when the identity was⬍99% andⱖ95%, the unknown isolate was assigned to the corresponding genus (6).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.Sequences of accession numbers with a prefix of “DQ” in Table 2 were determined in this study and have been submitted to GenBank.

RESULTS

Construction of oligonucleotide probe database.

A total of

88 probes (Table 2) were used to construct an oligonucleotide

database, which was then used for fabrication of the array

shown in Fig. 1. Among the 88 probes, 70 were species specific,

8 were group specific, and 10 were supplemental probes. A

group-specific probe (such as the probes Ecas and Salbe) could

hybridize with the PCR products of two or more species due to

high sequence similarities among these species (Table 2).

Sup-plemental probes were designed from the ITS or the 16S

rRNA gene regions that were coamplified by PCR during ITS

amplification and were used to differentiate genetically related

species of streptococci.

An individual species was identified by one to four probes,

depending on the availability of divergent sequences in the ITS

region. For example,

Enterococcus avium

was identified by a

single probe (Eav), while a strain was identified as

Enterococ-cus dispar

if all three probes (Edi1, Edi2, and Edi3) were

simultaneously hybridized (Table 2). Some species were

iden-tified by a combination of group-specific probes. For example,

Streptococcus bovis

was identified by its hybridization to two

group-specific probes, Salbe and Sbec (Table 2; Fig. 2).

Al-though

Streptococcus alactolyticus

also hybridized to the probe

Salbe and

S. lutetiensis

hybridized to the probe Sbec, neither

species could simultaneously hybridize with both probes.

Fur-thermore, some species were identified by their unique

pat-terns of hybridization to group-specific and supplemental

probes. For example, both

S. gallolyticus

subsp.

gallolyticus

and

S. gallolyticus

subsp.

macedonicus

hybridized with the

group-specific probe Sgalgm and were differentiated by hybridization

to two supplemental probes, S16SC and S16ST.

S. gallolyticus

subsp.

gallolyticus

produced positive hybridization with the

probe S16ST, whereas

S. gallolyticus

subsp.

macedonicus

was

positive with the probe S16SC (Table 2; Fig. 2). Another

ex-ample was

S. miti

s and

S. oralis

; both species hybridized to

the group-specific probe Smg and the supplemental probe

Smgmo1. The two species were distinguished by hybridization

of

S. mitis

to an additional supplemental probe, Smgmp1, and

[image:5.585.47.544.80.381.2]

S. oralis

to another supplemental probe, Smgor1 (Table 2; Fig.

TABLE 2—

Continued

Microorganism

Probe

Code Sequence (5⬘–3⬘)a Length

(bp) Tm(°C) Location

b GenBank

accession no.

S. porcinus Spor GTCTTATTTAAGTTATGAGAAC(T) 22 37.3 48–69 DQ204498 S. pyogenes Spyo (T)CTAAACTTAATACAAGTGAAGT 22 37.9 141–162 AY347560 S. ratti Srat1 ATACAAAGAGATGTTCGGAAGAGGACA(T) 27 57.6 266–292 DQ204497

Srat2 CGGAAGAGGACAATTTTGTATTCTAGT(T) 27 54.8 314–340 DQ204497

S. salivarius Sinfsa1c

ATGAGTTAGGTCGAAAGGCC(T) 20 50.0 246–265 DQ204499

Ssalc

(T)GGAATGTACTTGAGTTTCTTATT 23 44.0 13–35 AY347561

S16STe,f AGGTGGGATAGATGATT(T) 17 36.9 17–33 DQ204553

S. sanguinis Ssand GACACACGGAATGCACTTGA(T) 20 51.5 17–36 AY347565 S. sobrinus Ssob (T)TAGGACGGCCATCTT 16 39.5 76–91 DQ204560 S. suis Ssui (T)GGAAACCTGTACGTCAGTCTT 21 47.6 11–31 DQ204558 S. thermophilus Sinfsa1c ATGAGTTAGGTCGAAAGGCC(T) 20 50.0 246–265 DQ204499

Ssalc (T)GGAATGTACTTGAGTTTCTTATT 23 44.0 13–35 AY347561

S16SCe,f

AGGTGGGACAGATGATT(T) 17 40.2 16–32 DQ204555

Stve

GTCGAAAGGCCAAAATA(T) 17 42.9 256–272 U32965

S. uberis Sube1d GGATACAGTTCAACTGAACTTAATA(T) 25 46.7 150–174 AY347538

Sube2d CATTGTATCTTAGTATAGTCCATTG(T) 25 45.0 186–210 AY347538

S. urinalis Sur1 (T)ATGGAAACGATTGGTCGTCT 20 50.9 9–28 DQ204552

Sur2 TCTAGGATAGTCCATTGACAATTG(T) 24 49.8 139–162 DQ204552

S. vestibularis Sinfsa1c ATGAGTTAGGTCGAAAGGCC(T) 20 50.0 246–265 DQ204499

Ssalc (T)GGAATGTACTTGAGTTTCTTATT 23 44.0 13–35 AY347561

S16STe,f

AGGTGGGATAGATGATT(T) 17 36.9 17–33 DQ204553

Stve

GTCGAAAGGCCAAAATA(T) 17 42.9 256–272 U32965

Nutritionally variant streptococci

Abiotrophia defectiva Ade AAATAGCGCGAAAGTATCATGCATCAA(T) 27 60 198–224 AY351327 Granulicatella

G. adiacens Gad TATCACAACAAATAACCAATTAA(T) 23 44.6 219–241 AY353083 G. balaenopterae Gbal1 ATAACGGAACCTACCAAGTTCACTTCT(T) 27 56.2 11–37 DQ204534

Gbal2 TGAGAGATTAATTCTCTCTAGACTTTGATC(T) 30 53.2 49–78 DQ204534

Gbal3 GCAAACGCGAATCATATTGAGACTTAA(T) 27 58.8 177–203 DQ204534

G. elegans Gele1 GAGGTTAACTCTCAACTCGACCTTTGAAAA 30 60.5 76–105 DQ204535

Gele2 TTTAACAAGAAGCAACGCGACCATA 25 58.9 176–200 DQ204535

Positive control PCg (T)GTCGTAACAAGGTAGCCGTA 20 47.3 1474–1493 AB023575

a

(T), additional bases of thymine were added to the 5⬘or 3⬘end of the probe. IfTmwasⱕ37°C, 15 thymine bases were added; ifTmwasⱕ45°C, 10 thymine bases were added; and ifTmwasⱖ45°C, 5 thymine bases were added to the probe.

b

The location of the probe is indicated by the nucleotide number of the ITS sequence, except where otherwise indicated. c

Group-specifics probes. d

Probe sequences already published (9). e

Supplemental probes. f

Probes designed from the 16S rRNA genes. g

The positive control probe was designed from a conserved region at the 3⬘end of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene.

on May 16, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(6)

2). Species that required group-specific and supplemental

probes for identification are indicated in Table 2.

Identification of reference strains by the oligonucleotide

array.

Of 162 target reference strains tested, 154 hybridized to

their respective oligonucleotide probes and were correctly

identified. The hybridization patterns of 53 species and 6

sub-species, a majority of them being type strains, on the arrays are

alphabetically shown in Fig. 2. Reference strains of the

differ-ent taxa in the

S. bovis

complex, i.e.,

S. bovis

,

S. gallolyticus

subsp.

gallolyticus

,

S. gallolyticus

subsp.

macedonicus

, and

S.

gallolyticus

subsp.

pasteurianus

, were successfully differentiated

by the array. Species that have high sequence similarities in

their 16S rRNA genes were also accurately identified by the

present method. These species were

S. mitis

and

S.

pneu-moniae

,

Streptococcus gordonii

and

S. mitis

,

Enterococcus

du-rans

and

Enterococcus faecium

, and

Enterococcus gallinarum

and

Enterococcus casseliflavus

(27, 35).

Eight reference strains (4.9%), including one enterococcal

and seven streptococcal species, produced discrepant

identifi-cation by the array. Determination of the 16S rRNA gene

sequences of these strains showed that six of the eight strains

had been given wrong species names (Table 3).

Enterococcus

pseudoavium

CCUG 44888 was identified as

E. avium

by array

hybridization. A BLAST search revealed that the 16S rRNA

gene sequence of the strain CCUG 44888 had identities of 99.1

and 98.8% with GenBank reference sequences of

E. avium

and

E. pseudoavium

, respectively (Table 3). Therefore,

E.

pseudoa-vium

CCUG 44888 should be a strain of

E. avium

, as identified

by the array and confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Similarly,

Streptococcus mutans

BCRC 15255,

S. mutans

BCRC

15256,

Streptococcus sobrinus

CCUG 35254,

Streptococcus

uberis

ATCC 13386, and

Streptococcus vestibularis

CCUG

32749 were found to be misidentifications of

Streptococcus ratti

,

S. ratti

,

Streptococcus mutans

,

Streptococcus parauberis

, and

Streptococcus salivarius

, respectively, as revealed by array

hy-bridization and further confirmed by their 16S rRNA gene

sequences (Table 3).

S. cristatus

CCUG 35233 and

S. mitis

ATCC 15914 were identified only to the genus level (

Strepto-coccus

) by sequencing of the 16S rRNA genes (Table 3), since

the identities between the query sequences and the

best-scor-ing reference sequences in the public databases were only 98%.

However, a BLAST search of the ITS sequences of

S. cristatus

CCUG 35233 and

S. mitis

ATCC 15914 against GenBank

re-vealed that the both best-scoring sequences were from

S. oralis

,

with sequence identities of 99.6% and 99.1%, respectively. To

further clarify the identities of strains CCUG 35233 and ATCC

15914, the manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase genes

(

sodA

) of both strains were amplified (38) and sequenced. A

BLAST search of the

sodA

sequences of strains CCUG 35233

and ATCC 15914 revealed that the best-scoring reference

se-quences were

S. oralis

(GenBank accession no. Z99195;

se-quence identity, 96%) and

S. oralis

(GenBank accession

AB200066; sequence identity, 96%), respectively. Since the

hybridization results for strains CCUG 35233 and ATCC

15914 were supported by sequence analysis of the ITS region

and

sodA

gene, the two strains were considered to be correctly

identified as

S. oralis

by the array. Since all eight discordant

reference strains were proved to be correctly identified by

array hybridization, the test sensitivity of the array for

refer-ence strains was 100% (162/162).

Identification of clinical isolates by the oligonucleotide

ar-ray.

Of 150 target clinical isolates tested,

E. avium

2510 and

E.

durans

790 yielded discrepant identifications by array

hybrid-ization (Table 3).

E. avium

2510 and

E. durans

790 were

iden-tified as, respectively,

Enterococcus raffinosus

and

Enterococcus

hirae

by the array, and this identification was confirmed by

sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA genes. Since these two

discordant isolates were proved to be correctly identified by

hybridization, the test sensitivity of the array for clinical

lates was 100% (150/150). If reference strains and clinical

iso-lates were considered together, an overall sensitivity of 100%

(312/312) was obtained by the present method.

Hybridization of nontarget strains to the oligonucleotide

array.

Of 73 nontarget strains (51 species) tested by the array

(see Table S1 in the supplemental material), one strain (

Vibrio

alginolyticus

BCRC 12829) hybridized to the probe Saga and

was misidentified as

Streptococcus agalactiae

(Fig. 2). The

re-maining 72 strains did not produce any hybridization signals

with probes on the array, except for the positive control probe.

Therefore, the test specificity of the array was 98.6% (72/73).

DISCUSSION

In this study, an oligonucleotide array was developed to

identify 53 species and six subspecies of the genera

Abiotro-phia

,

Enterococcus

,

Granulicatella

, and

Streptococcus

. A

[image:6.585.43.286.67.298.2]

sensi-tivity of 100% (312/312) and a specificity of 98.6% (72/73) were

obtained by the array. The present method used a standardized

FIG. 1. Layout of oligonucleotide probes on the array (0.9 by 1.1

cm). The probe “PC” (A9) (a positive control) was designed from a

conserved region at the 3

end of the 16S rRNA gene. Probes coded

“NC” were negative controls (tracking dye only). Probes coded “M”

were digoxigenin-labeled primer 6R and were used as position

mark-ers. Probes in the upper left, upper right, and lower left corners were

used to identify species of nutritionally variant streptococci,

entero-cocci, and streptoentero-cocci, respectively. Probes in the lower right corner

were supplemental probes. The corresponding sequences of all probes

are listed in Table 2.

on May 16, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(7)

protocol encompassing DNA extraction, PCR amplification of

the ITS regions, and hybridization of the PCR products to the

array. The hybridized spot (400

m in diameter), displaying a

blue color on a white nylon membrane, could be easily

recog-nized by the naked eye. The whole procedure can be finished

within approximately 8 h, starting from isolated colonies. The

present method might be useful for conditions that necessitate

identification of enterococci, streptococci, and related bacteria

to the species (and subspecies) level.

In this study, an individual species was identified by either

one or multiple probes, depending on the availability of

diver-gent sequences in the ITS region. The advantage of using

multiple probes is the increase in specificity, since the chance

for a cross-reacting strain to hybridize to all probes designed

for a species is very low. However, the use of multiple probes

to identify a species may potentially decrease sensitivity, due to

the possibility of mutations that occur at the regions used for

probe design. The successful design of different probes,

includ-ing group-specific and supplemental probes, was based on the

known sequences in regions of the ITS and the 3

ends of 16S

rRNA genes. Multiple sequence alignment (interspecies and

intraspecies) plays an essential role in finding out the regions

that could be used for probe design.

Routine procedures based on phenotypic tests do not allow

unequivocal identification of some streptococci. Hoshino et al.

(24) examined a collection of 115 strains of nonhemolytic

streptococci isolated from bacteremic patients and 33

refer-ence strains by using 2 commercial kits (rapid ID 32 STREP

and STREPTOGRAM [Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka,

Ja-pan]). The correct identification rates for strains by both

com-mercial kits were below 50% but varied significantly between

species. The most significant problems were observed with

S.

mitis

and

S. oralis

and 11

Streptococcus

species described since

1991. They concluded that phenotypic characterization is of

limited value for identification of many species of

nonhemo-lytic streptococci and is not a valid approach at the present

time. Recently, Bosshard et al. (6) tested 171 strains of aerobic

catalase-negative gram-positive cocci with the API 20 STREP

system and found that less than 60% of isolates could be

identified to the species or genus level. To solve the problems

of phenotypic identification, the feasibility of using an

oligo-nucleotide array for species identification was investigated

here and favorable results were obtained. The array technology

has been used to identify a spectrum of microorganisms,

in-cluding

Mycobacterium

(17, 34, 43), bacteria in positive blood

cultures (7), bacteria from cervical swab specimens (32),

on May 16, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(8)

Campylobacter

(53),

Listeria

(54), and food-borne bacterial

pathogens (29).

Clinical isolates used in this study were identified by the

Rapid ID 32 STREP system. To avoid as much as possible

discrepant identification results, thus avoiding sequence

anal-ysis of the 16S rRNA gene as much as possible, only those

[image:8.585.45.283.69.425.2]

strains having excellent species identification (i.e., percent

identification of

99.9%) according to the criteria of the ID 32

STREP system were used for array testing. Strains with good

identification (percent identification of

90%) or acceptable

identification (percent identification of

80%) were not

in-cluded in this study, since Bosshard et al. (6) observed that

[image:8.585.42.546.557.692.2]

FIG. 2. Hybridization results for species of enterococci (18

spe-cies), streptococci (31 species and 6 subspespe-cies), and nutritionally

variant streptococci (4 species). All strains, except two, were type

strains and were alphabetically arranged according to their species

names. The corresponding probes hybridized on the arrays are

indi-cated in Fig. 1, and the corresponding sequences of the hybridized

probes are shown in Table 2. The hybridized probe on the uppermost

right corner on each array was the positive control. Hybridization

signals produced by supplemental probes (located at the lower right

corner) were used to differentiate genetically related species of

strep-tococci and had no use in identification of enterococci and nutritionally

variant streptococci.

TABLE 3. Strains that produced discrepant identification by array hybridization and results of discrepant analysis

Strain Species name

received

Species identification by:

Result of discrepant analysis Array

hybridization 16S rRNA gene sequence (%) a

CCUG 44888

E. pseudoavium

E. avium

E. avium

(99.1),

E. pseudoavium

(98.8)

E. avium

CCUG 35233

S. cristatus

S. oralis

S. oralis

(98),

S. mitis

(98)

S. oralis

b

ATCC 15914

S. mitis

S. oralis

S. oralis

(98),

S. mitis

(98),

S. pneumoniae

(98)

S. oralis

b

BCRC 15255

S. mutans

S. ratti

S. ratti

(99),

S. mutansc

(92)

S. ratti

BCRC 15256

S. mutans

S. ratti

S. ratti

(99),

S. mutans

(92)

S. ratti

CCUG 35254

S. sobrinus

S. mutans

S. mutans

(99),

S. sobrinus

(90)

S. mutans

ATCC 13386

S. uberis

S. parauberis

S. parauberis

(99),

S. uberis

(92)

S. parauberis

CCUG 32749

S. vestibularis

S. salivarius

S. salivarius

(99.7),

S. vestibularis

(99.1)

S. salivarius

2510

c

E. avium

E. raffinosus

E. raffinosus

(100),

E. avium

(99)

E. raffinosus

790

c

E. durans

E. hirae

E. hirae

(99),

E. durans

(98)

E. hirae

aValues in parentheses are percentages of 16S rRNA gene sequence identities of the test strains with sequences in GenBank.

bCCUG 35233 and ATCC 15914 were found to beS. oralisby sequence analysis of the ITS region (8) and the manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) (38).

cClinical isolates.

on May 16, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(9)

such identifications were unreliable. In addition, clinical

iso-lates of viridans group streptococcus were verified by ITS

se-quence analysis before hybridization (8). The primary

screen-ing and verification of clinical isolates may partially explain

why only 2 out of 150 isolates yielded discrepant identifications

by array hybridization. This screening largely limited the

num-bers of strains and species that could be tested in this study.

Moreover, the database of the Rapid ID 32 STREP system

does not include many recently described species listed in

Table 1, such as

S. australis

,

S. cristatus

,

S. infantarius

subspe-cies

infantarius

,

S. infantis

,

S. gallolyticus

, and others.

There-fore, clinical isolates of these recently described species were

not available for array testing. The accuracy of the array for

identification of species listed in Table 1 could be regarded as

being mainly based on testing of reference strains.

Pairwise comparison of two given streptococcal species

re-vealed a lower level of sequence similarity between their ITS

sequences than between their 16S rRNA gene sequences (8,

27). These results indicate that the ITS region might constitute

a more discriminative target sequence than the 16S rRNA

gene for differentiating closely related species. By 16S rRNA

gene sequencing, Bosshard et al. (6) found that as much as

19% of isolates of aerobic catalase-negative gram-positive

cocci could be identified only to the genus level. The ITS

region has been suggested as a suitable target for bacterial

identification by some investigators (20, 40, 47). A major

dis-advantage of this approach is the limited number of ITS

se-quences in public databases. However, the numbers of ITS

sequences in public databases have increased in recent years.

In 2006, software was developed to analyze bacterial ITS

se-quences (11).

Although most probes used in this study were designed from

the ITS regions, advantage was taken to utilize divergent

re-gions at the 3

ends of the 16S rRNA genes that were

coam-plified with the ITS regions by PCR. The following sets of type

strains display high ITS sequence identities:

E. casseliflavus

and

Enterococcus flavescens

(99.6%); the three subspecies (subsp

.

gallolyticus

, subsp

. macedonicus

, and subsp

. pasteurianus

) of

S.

gallolyticus

(94 to 99.6%);

S. infantis

and

S. pneumoniae

(96%);

S. infantis

and

S. mitis

(96%);

S. mitis

and

S. pneumoniae

(99%); and

S. salivarius

,

Streptococcus thermophilus

, and

S.

vestibularis

(98 to 99%) (our unpublished data). For this

rea-son, a combination of group-specific and supplemental probes

was used to differentiate these closely related species. An

ex-treme example was the differentiation of the three members in

the salivarius group (

S. salivarius

,

S. thermophilus

, and

S.

ves-tibularis

). All three species hybridized to two group-specific

probes, Sinfsa1 and Ssal, and unequivocal identification of the

three species was based on their differential hybridizations to

three supplemental probes, S16SC, S16ST, and Stv (Table 2;

Fig. 2), creating a unique hybridization pattern for each of the

three species.

S. pneumoniae

,

S. oralis

, and

S. mitis

are related species and

difficult to be differentiated by sequencing of the 16S rRNA

gene (6, 27). Phylogenetic trees constructed by using the genes

encoding 16S rRNA (5, 27),

sodA

(37, 38),

groESL

(51), and

the ITS region (8) grouped

S. mitis

and

S. pneumoniae

to-gether. The interspecies similarities of the ITS sequences

be-tween

S. mitis

and

S. pneumoniae

could be higher than

in-traspecies similarities of both species (8). In our previous

study, strains of

S. pneumoniae

cross-hybridized to probes used

to identify

S. mitis

(9). However, differentiation of

S. mitis

and

S. pneumoniae

was achieved here by their differential

hybrid-ization to two supplemental probes, Smgmo1 and Smgp1

(Ta-ble 2; Fig. 2).

S. mitis

produced positive hybridization with the

probe Smgmo1, while

S. pneumoniae

was positive with another

probe, Smgp1.

E. casseliflavus

and

E. flavescens

shared a group-specific

probe, Ecas, and could not be differentiated from each other

by array hybridization (Table 2; Fig. 2). Strains of

E.

casselifla-vus

and

E. flavescens

are motile, intrinsically vancomycin

resis-tant (possessing the

van

C genotype), and able to produce

pig-ments (49).

E. casseliflavus

and

E. flavescens

also could not be

distinguished from each other by using the tRNA intergenic

spacer PCR technique (2). The two species are most probably

synonymous, as is also apparent from several other studies

(13, 48).

The

S. bovis

complex comprises a heterogeneous group of

bacteria that belong to group D of the Lancefield classification.

Phenotypic characterization leads to a further subdivision of

S.

bovis

strains based on their biotype. Biotype I comprises

man-nitol-positive strains, whereas biotype II comprises

mannitol-negative strains (45).

S. bovis

biotype I is responsible for

hu-man endocarditis associated with colonic cancer (33, 52), and

this was highly correlated with an underlying colonic neoplasm

compared with bacteremia due to

S. bovis

biotype II (42).

Therefore, careful identification of streptococcal bacteremic

isolates as

S. bovis

biotype I provides clinically important

in-formation. Recently,

S. gallolyticus

of the

S. bovis

complex was

proposed to contain three subspecies:

S. gallolyticus

subsp.

gallolyticus

(

S. bovis

biotype I),

S. gallolyticus

subsp.

macedoni-cus

, and

S. gallolyticus

subsp.

pasteurianus

(

S. bovis

biotype II)

(44). Members of the

S. bovis

complex were successfully

iden-tified to the species or subspecies level in this study.

The

T

m

values of probes used in this study varied to a large

degree (from 27.7 to 60.5°C), and many probes had

T

m

values

lower than the hybridization temperature (45°C) (Table 2).

Although some probes produced relatively weak hybridization,

clear signals were obtained for almost all species tested (Fig.

2). This might be partially due to the use of relatively

low-stringency washing buffer (2

SSC–0.1% SDS) after

hybrid-ization. Volokhov et al. (54) also reported the successful use of

probes having

T

m

values significantly lower than the

hybridiza-tion temperature for identificahybridiza-tion of

Listeria

species. It has

been found that the addition of low numbers of 3

thymine

bases can improve the hybridization signal of oligonucleotide

probes that failed to show detectable hybridization to target

DNA or gave weak hybridization signals. Although the

mech-anisms of the effect of adding low numbers of thymine bases

are not clear, it was proposed that this could increase the

binding of probes to the nylon membrane and thus the

hybrid-ization intensity (1, 7).

In conclusion, species identification of

Abiotrophia

,

Entero-coccus

,

Granulicatella

, and

Streptococcus

by the present array is

highly reliable. With the exception of beta-hemolytic

strepto-cocci, the method could be used as an accurate alternative to

the conventional methods if adequate species identification is

of concern.

on May 16, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

Figure

TABLE 1. Reference strains and clinical isolates used in this study
TABLE 2. Oligonucleotide probes used in this study
TABLE 2—Continued
FIG. 1. Layout of oligonucleotide probes on the array (0.9 by 1.1cm). The probe “PC” (A9) (a positive control) was designed from a
+2

References

Related documents

crease the company’s reputation, meanwhile, founding that the proportion of senior women in different depart- ments made different impact on the company's reputation, meaning

La palabra eficiencia proviene del latín efficientia que en español quiere decir, acción, fuerza, producción. Eficiencia tiene varios significados:.. *) En economía, la

Derivation of analytical expressions for the steady state, transport limited current to microrings in the dark is a challenging problem because the diffusion equation must be

Observational study applying HyaCorp endogel in 125 gynecological laparoscopic surgeries for adhe- sion reduction: Laparoscopic Total and subtotal hys- terectomies(LTH,

Rule mining in spatio-temporal data - Drawbacks of existing Dependency Analysis algorithms are, while incorporating local search in high-dimensional spatio-

Even higher accuracies, however, were achieved by all techniques when using the data parsed in a different way (subtracting values), and the 60% glass- ceiling

The physiotherapists described a range of learning experiences from their project participation, including instrumental learning (the concrete application of knowledge to

US foreign assistance, also known as “foreign aid” or simply “aid,” is a US government (USG) system that uses American tax dollars to influence and develop other