• No results found

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW FOR MOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPERS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW FOR MOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPERS"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

FOR

MOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPERS

Chapter 1

(2)

Chapter I. Introduction – Mobile IP Landscape

Most agree that smartphone related technologies will remain a high growth area for the foreseeable future. Driving this boom is the convergence of various technologies that matured within a relatively small window of time. Unimaginable just a few years back, mobile technology is now able to seamlessly integrate high speed data, Wi-Fi, SMS, email, digital photography, high resolution displays, movies and music, touch screens, voice recognition, a mobile

application marketplace, and much more into a convenient handheld appliance. The resulting feature-rich mobile devices have unlimited appeal and an

apparently limitless number of applications.

To keep up with demand, mobile device makers and the mobile app

developers are pumping new models and Apps into the marketplace at a dizzying rate. Everyday we hear truly staggering statistics, such as:

“Mobile App downloads are being measured in the billions,”

“It has been estimated that more than 700,000 Android based devices are sold every day and analyst have predicted that the number will reach 2.5 million devices per day,”

“Apple profits for Q4 of 2011 double thanks to 37 million IPhone sales,” “Mobile App developer salaries are expected to increase 9.1% in 2012.” The technology advancements associated with mobile devices is

something not experienced since the introduction of the personal computer (PC) in the 1970’s and 1980’s. However, unlike the PC revolution of a few decades ago, developers of smartphone related technologies must deal with a much more complex and demanding universe of intellectual property issues. Recall that many of the features that APPLE® first gave us, including the mouse, were developed at a XEROX® research facility and left virtually unprotected from an intellectual property standpoint. Software technologies such as operating systems, word processing programs and spreadsheet programs were largely protected only by copyright. At the time, the ability to patent software was uncertain, and considered by many in the industry to be bad policy, if not unethical.

Clearly, those days are largely gone. All of the large mobile technology stakeholders have invested significant money and efforts in establishing

intellectual property rights for their technological innovations, both in hardware and software. The contrasting IP landscape between mobile computing and personal computing is evident from the following two graphs that show 10-year

(3)

patent activity for (1) smartphone related technologies between 2002 and 2011; and (2) personal computer related technologies between 1976 and 1985.

As can be seen in Graph 1, thousands of smartphone related patents have been filed and issued over the past decade. In 2011 alone, there were over 1100 new applications published and almost 800 patents issued.

Smartphone Patent Index

170 229 385 392 450 791 527 718 829 1070 134 143 539 735 768 333 945 1146 967 354 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year N u mb e r of Pa te nts

Granted Patents Patent Applications

© 2012 Hoffman W arnick LLC. Chart may be reproduced without written permission exactly as shown including logo.

Graph 1: Patent activity for mobile computing technologies

Compare this with the relatively small number of patents issued for personal computer related technologies between 1976 and 1985, as shown in Graph 2. (Note that in the US, patent applications were not published during the period shown in Graph 2.) While extracting patent data for these two

(4)

intellectual property plays for the emergence of mobile technologies far exceeds that experienced during a similar time period for personal computer technologies.

Personal Computer Patent Index

6 4 9 3 14 5 22 56 17 8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 Year N u m be r of Is s ue d P a te n ts

Issued Patents Pertaining to Personal Computers

© 2012 Hoffman Warnick LLC. Chart may be reproduced without written permission exactly as shown including logo.

Graph 2: Patent activity for personal computer technologies

Given the current IP climate, it is certainly not surprising that the different stakeholders are engaged in significant legal battles with each other. At the very highest level are those companies that make the devices and the operating

systems, Samsung, Apple, Nokia, RIM, Google, Microsoft, HTC, Motorola, LG, etc., etc. Throw in a bunch of additional companies that happen to own significant patent rights for smartphone related technologies, e.g., Kodak, Digitude,

Graphics Properties Holdings, and what you have is a worldwide patent litigation firestorm. With billions of dollars and the future of mobile device technology at stake, it makes sense that these players are aggressively utilizing intellectual property laws to carve out as much of the technology landscape as possible.

At a different level are the Mobile App developers, who are devising and releasing Mobile Apps as quick as they can find people to write them. With

(5)

hundreds of thousands of Apps already in the marketplace, it’s hard to envision Apps disappearing anytime in the near future. Questions nonetheless remain as to what the future holds for Mobile Apps. Will every business eventually require an App as a marketing channel? How will the industry deal with the fact that so many Apps get downloaded and then go virtually unused? Will the platform in which Apps are delivered evolve? Who will be the next Microsoft or Google? Clearly, over the next several years, winners and losers at both the device and App levels will be decided.

Although impossible to predict exactly how things will evolve, it remains a good bet that intellectual property will play a significant role in the evolution of mobile device technology. Accordingly, Hoffman Warnick has compiled this E-Book to provide some basic intellectual property law guidance for mobile technology developers, and particularly mobile App developers.

If at any time you would like more information regarding how we can help you navigate Intellectual property issues, please visit our Mobile App Law Group website at www.MobileAppLaw.com. You can also give us a call at 866-539-1395 or email us at [email protected].

References

Related documents

Abbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; HCV, hepatitis C virus; IBBSS, integrated bio-behavioral surveillance surveys; IQR, interquartile range; MENA, Middle East and North

Although we certainly would not describe these markets—either before these policies or after—as purely competitive, they still have many of the benefits of competitive markets. It

As discussed in Section 2, one main challenge of our platform is to support multiple data representations according to scientist requirements. Current platforms [16] use traditional

In this paper, we present an approach to implementing XBRL semantics using off-the-shelf Semantic Web technologies and specifically SPIN 3 , ) to semantically model

In the case of negative externalities, a larger number of firms provides the MSSP with more incentives to reduce the security investment to address the overinvestment issue for

The chess-board can be considered as the extension of a diagram formed by four squares, alternatively black and white, and constitutes in itself a mandala of Shiva, God in his

Through the integration of students from the University of Wyoming and local volunteers, including the property owners, the Gipson site investigations proved to be a

We then study the welfare e®ect of privatization interpreted as partial strategic delegation of the public ¯rm to a private manager with pro¯t concern.. It is shown that