• No results found

Charter Schools: Current Requirements and Future Developments

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Charter Schools: Current Requirements and Future Developments"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Charter Schools:

Current Requirements and Future Developments

Presented by:

Lori Sattenspiel, OSBA Legislative & Public Affairs Specialist Morgan Smith, OSBA Attorney

(2)
(3)

Charter Schools:

Current Requirements and Future developments Summer Board 2011

Presented by:

Lori Sattenspiel, Legislative & Public Affairs Specialist Morgan Smith, Attorney

Oregon School Boards Association

‡Introduction

‡National and State Charter landscape

‡Oregon’s law, including key recent changes

‡Application process

‡Basic operations of Charter Schools

‡Evaluation and monitoring

‡Charter renewal

‡Charter termination

‡Virtual Charters and looking forward

Agenda

‡Public School operated by groups outside of the traditional district-operated system

‡Funded with state school fund dollars

‡Accountable for results by state and federal law and terms of charter

‡Diverse students, programs, operational/legal arrangements

What is a Charter School?

(4)

Oregon School Boards Assocation 2

‡Defining a “Virtual” charter school vs. one that uses online courses

‡Original Charter laws did not envision this form of education

‡Recently grown in popularity requiring legislative action

‡SB 767 (2009) and now HB 994 (2011) have created workgroups to address issues

Virtual Public Charter Schools

‡In 2010, Over 1.7 million students will attend 5,450 public charter schools across the U.S.

‡60% are minority students over 50% are eligible for free and reduced lunch

‡Public charter schools comprise 3.5% of all public schools (based on student population) in the U.S.

National Overview

‡2010-2011

‡110 (estimated) Charter schools in one third of Oregon school districts

‡Approximately 18,000 students enrolled statewide

‡6 Virtual Charter Schools serving approximately 4,600 students

Oregon’s Charter Schools

(5)

‡Enacted in 1999

‡Oregon Revised Statute Chapter 338

‡Any person or group may proposed/develop

‡The school must be an Oregon non-profit and (in the process to be) a federal tax-exempt

corporation

‡Cannot convert an existing tuition based private school

‡Proposals and Charter contracts approved by school districts and now colleges

Oregon’s Charter Law

‡Must be non-sectarian and tuition-free

‡Minimum 25 student enrollment

‡Open, non-discriminatory admissions, lottery

‡In District student served first

‡Up to one-half of teachers/administrators may be non-licensed; all must be highly qualified

‡New changes for virtual schools, all must be licensed

‡Funded through districts at a % of ADMw

Oregon’s Charter Law (cont’d)

‡SB 767 (2009):

‡“Virtual Public Charter schools” added as a new type of Charter school

‡Adds extra requirements for their operation

‡For-profit entities cannot employ Charter School employees

Recent Amendments

(6)

Oregon School Boards Assocation 4

‡HB 3660 (2010):

‡State Board must proposed governance model for VPCS

‡HB 3645 (2011)

‡Allows institutions of higher education to sponsor charter schools

‡HB 3362 (2011)

‡Allows for cooperative sponsorship of charter schools between districts

Recent Amendments (cont’d)

‡HB 2299 (2011)

‡Sets up notification procedures for enrollment in charter schools, and un-enrollment

‡Sponsoring District of charter schools now responsible for implementing IEPs of students in the charter

‡And they also now receive the funding

Recent Amendments (cont’d)

‡HB 2301 (2011)

‡Institutes the 3% rule for virtual charter schools

‡Districts do not have to release more than 3% of their students to be in a virtual charter school

‡HB 3417 (2011)

‡Charter financial system must be compatible with that of the sponsoring district

Recent Amendments (cont’d)

(7)

Application Process

Application

• Charter group develops and submits to the District an application with all the information required by law.

Public Meeting

• The Board holds a hearing allowing public input on the proposed charter school within 60 days of receiving the application

Evaluation

• The District Board evaluates the application based on prescribed criteria in the law, and within 30 days of the public meeting they must….

Approval/Denial

• If the Board approves the application, they negotiate a Charter Agreement

• If the Application is denied, notice of denial is sent with suggestions for improvement, which may then be resubmitted within 20 days of receipt

‡ORS § 338.055

‡Demonstrated sustainable support within the community

‡Financial stability and financial management plan

‡Capability to provide comprehensive instruction to students, including Low achieving students

‡How good the application is

‡Whether the charter would adversely impact the District

‡Several others as well…

Application Evaluation Criteria

‡The Charter agreement is a contract between the District Board and the Charter School

‡Sets out the basics of their relationship and the rights and obligations of both parties

The Charter

(8)

Oregon School Boards Assocation 6

School Board &

Administration

High

School Middle

School Elementary School

Charter School

Charter Structure

Charter Contract

‡Free from many requirements under state education law

‡Funded at a percentage of ADMw

‡Open enrollment

‡Limits on online education

‡Students become residents of sponsoring Districts

‡Responsible for transportation

Charter Operations

‡The law mandates little in oversight, but what is required:

‡Review school’s annual report and annual audit

‡With a balance sheet from the Charter school and a statement of all transactions affecting the Charter

‡Annual site visit to determine compliance affecting the Charter

Monitoring and Evaluation

(9)

‡Despite the absence of legal oversight requirements:

‡Use the charter contract as a road map to oversight

‡The District and Charter should have an open collaboration

‡The charter contract should include realistic, measurable performance outcomes

‡New law requires more fiscal oversight specifically

‡Proactively include charter staff in district activities (i.e., professional development)

Monitoring and Evaluation (cont’d)

‡Initial charter – no more than 5 years

‡First renewal – must be the same period of time as the initial charter

‡Subsequent renewal – at least 5 years, but not more than 10 years

‡Avoid sporadic extensions

Charter Contract Length

Request for Renewal

• Within 180 days of the expiration of the current contract

Public Meeting

• Within 45 days from receiving the request, the District holds a meeting to allow input from the public

Renew/Non- Renew

• Within 10 days from the meeting, the District decides to renew or not, and officially notifies the Charter in 20 days

Enter New Charter

• If the Board decides to renew the Charter School, they negotiate a new Charter

Renewal Process

(10)

Oregon School Boards Assocation 8

‡Upon 60 days notice of termination, the sponsor can terminate for a failure to:

‡Meet charter terms, student achievement requirements or legal requirements

‡Maintain insurance and financial stability plan as required by law

‡Sponsor can terminate immediately for health and safety reasons

Charter Termination

‡Set out Virtual Public Charter Schools (VPCS as a separate form of Charter

‡VPCS is a charter that offers online courses and does not primarily serve students in a physical location

‡VPCS must have:

‡Heighted academic achievement plans

‡95% TSPC licensed teachers

‡Plans for student/teacher contact time

‡Plans for access to the curriculum

‡3% enrollment rule

Recent Adjustments for Virtual/Online Charters

‡General Charter rules apply to all charters

‡Sponsored by and received funding through Districts

‡Regular Ed: 80% ADM for K-8 and 95% for 9-12

‡No funding for:

‡Transportation, capital funds, federal title funds, School Improvement Funds

‡Some can be shared though

Funding and Finances

(11)

Contact us:

OSBA, 800-578-67022

Lori Sattenspiel, Legislative & Public Affairs Department, [email protected] Morgan Smith, Legal Labor & Employment Services, [email protected]

Questions?

References

Related documents

Similarly, for each generic prescription claim, we subtract that individual’s generic cost from an imputed branded cost, which is the average branded cost paid by individuals with

A rough comparison of paper versus electronic was made using information from the Kenya trial, comparing the unit costs of implementing the national assessment on paper (sample size

Extrapolating from our recent novel stereotype formation findings we will now review evidence which supports the possibility that a continuous cycle of stereotype formation and

These investigations include depth of mining, thickness of a mined coal seam, existence of multiple mining levels, and remaining coal pillars information that was subsequently used

SIN 132-8 gSA PRICE LIST ...8 TERMS AND CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO MAINTENANCE, REPAIR SERVICE FOR GOVERNMENT- OWNED GENERAL PURPOSE COMMERCIAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT

2012 I : European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 1691-701

McCune_PittCon Company Confidential Copyright © 2000 Eli Lilly and Company • trace samples and link results (current analysis ). • find samples (future searching and

This paper investigated the small sample properties of several methods for estimating risk premium parameters in the Fama-French three factor asset pricing model.. The simulation