• No results found

2013 PLUS Medical PL Symposium Credentialing in the World of ACOs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "2013 PLUS Medical PL Symposium Credentialing in the World of ACOs"

Copied!
44
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Chicago – April 10-11, 2013

2013 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

(2)

Credentialing in the World of ACOs

MODERATOR:

Fay A. Rozovsky, JD, MPH, DFASHRM, President, The Rozovsky Group, Inc. PANELISTS:

Patricia Hughes, RN, MSN, CPHRM, Vice President, Healthcare Risk

Management, OneBeacon Professional Insurance

William J. McDonough, PhD, ARM, Managing Principal,

(3)

$1,735 $1,855 $1,981 $2,113 $2,241 $2,379 $2,510 $2,624 $2,770 $2,931 $3,111 $3,313 $3,541 $3,790 $4,062 $4,353 15.8% 15.9% 15.9% 16.0% 16.2% 16.6% 17.6% 17.7% 17.9% 18.0% 18.2% 18.5% 18.9% 19.3% 19.8% 20.3% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0% 20.0% 21.0% $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Health Expenditures (billions)

National Health Expenditures as a Percent of Gross Domestic Product

CMS Projections for National Healthcare Spending CY 2003 - 2018

(Amount in Billions)

So urce: Cen ters fo r Med icaid & Med icare Services - NHE Pro jections 2008-2018, Forecast Summary and Selected Tables

Why is this on our AGENDA? Healthcare Spending Growth

(4)

The Shared Savings

Program Fundamentals

(5)

Shared Savings Program ACO Defined

A

legal entity

that is

recognized and authorized

under applicable State, Federal, or Tribal law

, is

identified by a Taxpayer Identification Number

(

TIN

), and is formed by one or more ACO

participant(s) that is(are) defined at 425.102(a)

and may also include any other ACO participants

described at 425.102(b).

(6)

SSP – ACO Core Elements

Must be a Legal Entity

Must have a Governing Body

With Leadership & Management

Enough Primary Care Providers

Minimum number of 5000

Medicare beneficiaries

Follow Required Processes COI – Conflict of Interest Rules

(7)

Aside from Caring for Medicare Patients

Meet Compliance and Quality Performance

Standards

Has the Ability to REPAY Shared Losses to CMS Receive + Distribute Shared Savings Make Required Quality Reports Medicare Beneficiaries (Patients) are assigned to the ACO by CMS

(8)

Other Core Components for SSP - ACOs

No Beneficiary Cherry-Picking Allowed

Provider Selection Process

Marketing Material

Beneficiary Assignments & Inducements

Data Gathering, Data Use Agreement, & “Opt Out”

Quality Performance Measures

DATA Retention

(9)

The Required ACO Processes

Internal reporting infrastructure.

 Follow experience of care survey

obligations from a certified vendor.

Evaluate population needs &

diversity.

 Written standards for

beneficiaries to access medical record information.

Significant diagnoses with

high impact on quality.

 Discharge & transfer to

specialist or specialty care.

Care plan individualized.

 Shared decision-making.

Understandable clinical details

for beneficiaries.

 ACO board member: at least

(10)

More on the Required Processes

Promote Use of Evidence-Based Medicine ACO Beneficiary Engagement

Use BOTH Quality and Cost Metrics

Provide Coordinated Beneficiary Care

Develop and Follow ACO Compliance

(11)

Three Year Agreement with CMS

Delineate the ACO participants and their

Medicare-enrolled Tax Information Numbers (TINs).

 Describes how the ACO plans to use

shared-savings.

Describes how the ACO will distribute shared

savings among providers and supplies.

(12)

The Contractual Obligation

“The ACO must agree, as a condition of

participating in the program and receiving any

shared savings payment, that

an individual with

the authority to legally bind the ACO will certify

the accuracy, completeness, and truthfulness of

any data or information requested by or

submitted to CMS, including, but not limited to,

the application form, etc.”

(13)

The “Others” Enforcing SSP - ACOs

State Law

Federal criminal law False Claims Act

Anti-Kickback Statute

Civil Monetary Penalties law Physician Self-Referral law Antitrust law

OIG

FTC

IRS

DOJ

(14)

The “Providers” in SSP - ACOs

Physician

Nurse Practitioner

Physician Assistant

Clinical Nurse Specialist

Other practitioners recognized by Medicare

(15)

ACO & Providers Screening

“An ACO whose screening reveals a history of program integrity issues and/or affiliations with individuals or entities (including ACO participants and ACO providers/suppliers) that have a

history of program integrity issues may be subject to rejection of their Shared Savings Program applications or the imposition of additional safeguards or assurances against program integrity risks.”

(16)

The SSP –ACO Provider Selection Process-I

(b) Screening of ACO applicants.

“(1) ACOs, ACO participants, and ACO providers/suppliers will be reviewed during the Shared Savings Program application process and periodically thereafter with regard to their program integrity history, including any history of Medicare program

exclusions or other sanctions and affiliations with individuals or entities that have a history of program integrity issues.”

425.304 Other program requirements.

(17)

The SSP-ACO Provider Selection Process-II

“(2) ACOs, ACO participants, or ACO providers/suppliers whose screening reveals a history of program integrity issues or

affiliations with individuals or entities that have a history of

program integrity issues may be subject to denial of their Shared Savings Program applications or the imposition of additional

safeguards or assurances against program integrity risks.” 425.304 Other program requirements.

(b) Screening of ACO applicants.

(18)

The CMS Agreement & Provider Selection

425.204 Content of the application. (c) Eligibility.

“(i) Documents (for example, participation agreements, employment contracts, and operating policies) sufficient to describe

the…ACO providers’/ rights and obligations in and

representation by the ACO, including how the opportunity to receive shared savings or other financial arrangements will encourage…ACO providers/suppliers to adhere to the quality assurance and improvement program and evidenced-based clinical guidelines.”

(19)

The CMS Agreement & Provider Selection - II

425.204 Content of the application. (c) Eligibility.

“(ii) …descriptions of the remedial processes and

penalties (including the potential for expulsion) that will apply if an… ACO provider/supplier fails to comply with and implement these processes.”

(20)

Credentialing NOT in the ACO Law

NOTICE No mention of the term “credentialing” in the law or regulation. Was it an oversight?

Does it mean that “selection” is all that is needed?

Will provider contracting suffice?

Should ACOs use “borrowed” credentialing from

member facilities?

(21)

The Risk Exposures: The Case

for ACO Credentialing

(22)

Traditional Credentialing Risk Exposure-I

Negligent Selection

In ACO “Speak”

Corporate Liability of

(23)

Traditional Credentialing Risk Exposure-II

ACO Director and Officer Liability Risk Exposure “Wrongful” Economic Credentialing by ACO

(24)

What About the ACOs Liability Exposure?

Provider Group members unavailable Medicare – Medicaid Debarment List

“Only” credentialed ACO group for

cardiothoracic surgery – disabled, called up to active service, etc.

How does the ACO maintain CMS contract?

ACO compliance plan says “ZERO

tolerance” for debarred care providers.

But what about continuity of beneficiary care? CMS contract?

(25)

And What About the Loss Column?

Geriatric Practice pushes the ACO into the loss column. High beneficiary satisfaction scores.

Good clinical outcomes.

“This is terrible! Just look at the utilization costs here. At the rate they are going this geriatric medical group is going to push us into a huge shared loss. We have no other recourse. Get rid of them-fast.”

(26)

The ERM Credentialing

Perspective for ACOs

(27)

Why ACO ERM Credentialing

Human Capital Operations Hazards Legal/Regulatory Financial Reputation

(28)

ERM in Perspective

A business decision-making process

instituted and

supported by the board of directors, executive

administration, and clinical leadership.

Goal: Reduce

uncertainty and process variability,

promote patient safety and to

maximize asset

preservation.

Adapted from Enterprise Risk Management Handbook for Healthcare Entities, Second Edition. R. Carroll, Editor in Chief. AHLA 2013.

(29)

ERM Style ACO Credentialing

Human Capital

Education

Licensure & DEA status

Boards/Fellowships

Clinical competencies

Quality

Clinical outcomes

Language skills

Technology skills

(30)

ERM Style ACO Credentialing

Operations

Credentialing Process

Outcome measures oversight

Integrity checking oversight

Licensure updates

Medical Malpractice insurance

updates

Health check updates

Certification updates

(31)

ERM Style ACO Credentialing

Hazards

Patient complaints/litigation

Regulatory complaints

Litigation

DEA Action

State licensure action

Medicare sanctions - program integrity

issues

Medicare debarment

(32)

ERM Style ACO Credentialing

Legal/Regulatory Non-compliance by credentialed provider

ACO Data Use Agreement – HIPAA violation by credentialed provider or group

Conflict-of-interest violation Negligent credentialing claim Corporate liability claim

Enterprise liability claim

Wrongful economic credentialing claim

Shared Loss – credentialed provider-related

(33)

ERM Style ACO Credentialing

Financial Shared Losses Preparation:

Surety Bonds

 Line of credit for Medicare  Escrow Funds

 Reinsurance

Litigation–cost of defense/judgment costs

Business Interruption – Replacing the debarred, credentialed provider

(34)

ERM ACO Credentialing

Reputation “That care provider was a fake. They

should have known it.”

“Medicare Fraud Alleged Against Prominent Physician and Care Organization.”

“Doctor Claims He was Turfed Out by

ACO for Telling the Truth about Lax Care for Medicare Beneficiaries.”

(35)

Practical Considerations

Who Will Manage

ACO Credentialing?

What Data Will Be Used in

ACO Credentialing?

How should the ACO respond if a care

provider losses

credentials at a member hospital?

Should an ACO provide a due process approach in

credentialing & corrective action?

(36)

What Risk Transfer or

Retention Models Should

We Consider?

(37)

ACO Risk Analysis

What are our RISKS with an ACO?

Do we understand these RISKS?

Do we have the capacity to retain ACO risk?

Captives, RRGs, other self-insurance vehicles

Do we need to transfer the risk?

New RISK = New Policies?

Monitoring RISK across the ACO continuum -

(38)

Accountable Care as a Care and Risk Integrator

Specialty Care Primary Care Ambulatory Hospital and ED Skilled Nursing Nursing Home Home Health Patients 38

(39)

What are the Risks?

ACO

Care Management Brand Med Mal D&O Credentialing Reputation Network Design Clinical Protocols Regulatory

(40)
(41)

The “Insurance” Conundrum – the Perfect Storm

Coverages

Professional Liability, Medical Malpractice Exposures including vicarious

liability

Directors and Officers (Management Risk)

Managed Care Errors and Omissions (Back to the Future, acting like a HMO) Fiduciary and Crime

Provider Excess, Catastrophic Medical Reinsurance (Excess of Medical Loss

protection)

Regulatory Coverage

(42)

Coverage/Insurance Considerations

• Understand your (ACO) Risk Profile

• Stress test your current policies

• Develop claim scenarios as educational tools for

leadership

• What about Medicaid ACOs? Do they have specific needs

in terms of insurance?

• What about the trend toward state-based ACOs and

Exchanges like Massachusetts? Are there state-specific

insurance requirements for the ACO, the providers and the

partnering entities?

(43)

Conclusion

• ACOs are not a fad.

• Different models will continue to evolve.

• Credentialing the care providers will involve more

than quality.

• Integrity and economic credentialing

will be part of

the picture.

• Follow an

Enterprise Risk Management

approach to

address

ACO credentialing and risk retention or

(44)

THANK YOU!

References

Related documents

• ACOs participating in Medicare Shared Savings Program • Experience of ACO formed by community health centers • Consideration of ACO model to serve Medicaid patient population

Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC© 5 Medicare ACOs ACO Medicare Contractor Hospital IPA Group practice Data processing Data Shared savings Shared savings Data/DUA Regular

• Organizations may participate in a Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO (MSSP ACO) or a Pioneer ACO • CMMI expects to partner with 30 Pioneer ACOs, but. could

Under the proposed rule, providers would not be allowed to participate in an ACO under the Medicare Shared Savings Program if, at the same time, it were to participate in (1)

managing changes to the list of ACO participants and ACO providers/ suppliers; (3) clarifications and updates to application requirements; (4) eligibility requirements related to

Under the proposed rule, providers would not be allowed to participate in an ACO under the Medicare Shared Savings Program if, at the same time, it were to participate in (1)

Quarterly ACO Data Sharing Cycle SHP ACO Beneficiary SQL Database ACO Beneficiary Listing Worksheet CMS Medicare Shared Savings Program SHP ACO Beneficiary SQL

Given ACOs must meet minimum quality standards and thresholds in order to receive any shared bonus, we urge CMS to reward those ACO providers that exceed certain threshold levels.