Date: 08/04/2020 To,
The Member Secretary, Expert Appraisal Committee, (Industrial Project-II)
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Indira Paryavaran Bhavan,
Jor Bagh Road, New Delhi-110 003
Subject: Submission of Queries for Environmental Clearance application of M/s. Orgo Chem (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. Located at Plot No. 719, Road No. 7, Sachin GIDC, Taluka - Chorasi, District - Surat, Gujarat, INDIA.
Reference: EC Application on dated 21st March 2020 Proposal No.: IA/GJ/IND2/124974/2019 File No.: IA-J-11011/339/2019-IA-II(I) Dear Sir,
We, Orgo Chem (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. did online application for persual of Environmental Clearance for our proposed new project of Synthetic Organic Chemical (Dye Intermediates and Specialty Chemicals) proposed at Plot No. 719, Road No. 7, Sachin GIDC, Taluka - Chorasi, District - Surat, Gujarat, INDIA on dated 21st March 2020. Query was raised by MS on dated 24th March 2020 and with reference to the same you are requested to find the attached reply of queries. We request you to kindly consider the same and consider our proposal for further proceedings. Thanking you.
Enclosures:
Enclosure 1: Reply of Queries
Additional Attachments in Enclosures:
Annexure 1: Compliance of MoEF Circular for CPA (Critically Polluted Area) and SPA (SeverelyPolluted Area) dated 31st October 2019.
Annexure 2: Treatabillity Study Report Annexure 3: Plant Layout
Annexure 4: Land Possession Documents Annexure 5: Notification of Sachin GIDC Annexure 6: Revised ToR Complainces Annexure 7: Revised Form-2
Enslosure 1: Reply of Queries
Sr. No. Query Reply
1
S. no. 23.1 of form 2 (CPA) mentioned However PP has not submitted the Report as per the Ministry’s office memorandum 31st October, 2019 regarding projects located in Critically Polluted Area
Project site is proposed at Plot No. 719, Road No. 7, Sachin GIDC, Taluka - Chorasi, District - Surat, Gujarat which is located in Critically Polluted Area as Notified in Office Memorandum of MoEF dated 31st October, 2019, F. No.22-23/2018-IA.III (Pt).
Compliance of Compliance of Mechanism for Environmental Management ofCritically Polluted Area (CPA) was also attached as Additional Attachment in EC Application and here as Annexure 1. Unit has proposed to implement complete ZLD system for effluent. No effluent will be discharged outside plant premises. Unit has proposed to use natural gas as a fuel with 30 m stack height. As conditioned 40% of the total area is proposed for the green belt development. Condition wise compliance is attached in Annexure 1.
2
Effluent treatment mechanism with plan for Zero Liquid Discharge needs to be submitted.
Unit has already proposed ZLD (Zero liquid Discharge) for the proposed project. Total wastewater generation shall be 34.5 KL/Day (30 KL/Day Industrial + 4.5 KL/Day Domestic). Entire Industrial effluentwill be treated into in-house MEE plant followed by biological treatment and RO plant. RO permeate water shall be reusedback within plant premises and RO reject water shall be again sent back to MEE plant. Domestic wastewater shall be disposed through septic tank/Soak pit system. Details of water consumption and wastewater generation along with process description of effluent treatment plant (ZLD) are given below.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND WASTEWATER GENERATION
Description Water Consumption Wastewater generation
KL/Day KL/Day
Total Industrial 37 30
Process 13.5 13.5
Boiler 10 5
Cooling 9 7
Washing 3 3
Scrubber 1.5 1.5
Domestic 5 4.5
Gardening 3 0
Process Description of Effluent Treatment Plant
Effluent generated during manufacturing process and other utility operations shall be sent to inhouse MEE plant followed by biological plant and RO plant. Permeate water from RO plantshall be recycle and reused back within plant premises and RO reject water shall be againsent back to MEE plant.
Captive MEE:
For Captive MEE facility, effluent first will be collected in collection tank. Such two collection tanks are provided. In each collection tank before sending effluent for further treatment, Limesolution / caustic lye is added for neutralization. Once one batch of collection tank isneutralized effluent is fed to inlet of settling tank. Here precipitated mass is allowed to settleunder gravity. Clear supernatant is collected in MEE feed tank. Sludge from settling tank is dewatered through filter press.
Effluent from MEE feed tank is transferred to multiple effect evaporation system. Hereeffluent is evaporated in forced circulation multiple effect evaporator byconcentrating it from 1% solid content to 30% solid content. Concentrated mass is further subjected to evaporation in ATFD / Pusher centrifuge system where salt is recovered at thebottom. Evaporated mass obtained as condensate from MEE system is collected in condensate storage tank. It is expected that evaporated mass will have very less concentration of low volatiles though condensate can have COD/BOD in range of 1500 / 500 mg/lit which needs further polishing treatment for reuse in process.
Condensate such obtained is subjected to biological treatment using Activated Sludge Processin aeration tank. Aeration Tank mixed liquor is fed to secondary settling tank for separation of biomass. Clean liquor is then collected in treated waste water storage tank. Biomass is recycled back to aeration tank. At regular interval biomass is wasted as side stream and subjected to dewatering along with primary sludge.
Treated wastewater after aeration tank is subjected to treatment through RO plant for providing polishing treatment. Since TDS level of condensate is expected to be in range of 500-1000 mg/l, RO recovery of more than 90% is achieved in RO plant. RO reject is fed back to MEE feed tank for treatment. RO Permeate is recycled back to plant for reuse mainly as utility water in cooling tower and boiler application.
It is also to note that, lab scale treatability study was carried out for the finalization of treatment scheme of the effluent and based on that only, the ETP scheme has been proposed. Stagewise charactristics of the effluent is given in the table below.
CHAPRACTERISTICS OF WASTEWATER
Parame
ter Unit
Concentr ated Stream Characte
ristics
Effluent Characteri stics After
MEE Treatment
Reduct ion (%)
Effluent Characteri stics After Biological Treatment
Reduct ion (%)
Effluent Characteri stics After
RO Treatment
Reduct ion (%)
pH - 2.5 6.6 - 7.1 - 7.2 -
COD mg/l 34561 3456 90 691 80 <100 80
BOD mg/l 11234 640 94.3 160 75 <30 70
TDS mg/l 44895 449 99 450 - <50 90
Suspend
ed Solid mg/l 986 - - <20 - - -
Effluent flow: 30 KL/Day + 4 KL/Day from RO reject Capacity of ETP: 35 KL/Day
LIST OF EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT UNITS (CONCENTRATED STREAM) Sr.
No. Equipments Nos. of Units Brief Specification 1 Collection Tank 2 Type: Circular Capacity: 25 m3
RCC Tile line
2 Dosing Tank (pH CorrectionSystem) 2 Capacity: 500 Litres MOC: HDPE circular tank
3 Neutralization Tank 2 Type: Rectangular tank Capacity: 25 m3 RCC Tile line
4 Stripper 1
Feed rate: 2 KL/hr (based on 20 hrs operation)
Heating medium: Dry saturated steam at 5 kg/cm2(g)
Steam Temperature: as per saturated steam condition
MOC of major parts All HT tubes: Ti (Grade 2) Tube sheet: SS316
Bottom Dish End, Liquid piping, liquid vapor separator
(Where liquid is in contact): SS316 Vapor contact part: SS304
5 MEE with ATFD 1
Cap: 3 m3/hr Treatment Scheme:
1. Tripple stage forced circulation 2. Tripple stage evaporator followed by ATFD/Centrifuge
for removal of salts Utility:
Steam at 5 kg/cm2g Cooling water at 32 deg C MOC of major parts: All tubes: SS316 L Ti/Ti Vapor line: SS316L Shell side: SS316L Circulation Line: SS316L Inlet parameter:
Sr.
No. Equipments Nos. of Units Brief Specification
pH:7-8 (On line pH correction to be provided)
Inlet Salts: 15-20 % by wt
6 Biological treatment 1
Aeration Tank: Cap: 2 m3/hr Retention time: 18 Hr
RCC Circular tank with epoxy paint Secondary Lamella:
Cap: 2m3/hr MOC: MS Lined
7 Intermittent storage tank 1
Type: RCC Circular tank Diameter: 6 m
Height: 1.5 m + 0.5 m free board Volume: 56.52 m3
MOC : RCC with Epoxy lining
8 Dual Sand Filter 1 Capacity: 2 m3/hr
9 RO Plant 1
Capacity: Feed 34 m3/day
Feed Flow rate: 2 m3/hr based on 20 hours/day operation
Inlet Parameter PH: 7 to 7.5 COD: < 250 mg/lit TDS: < 1000 mg/lit
Suspended solids: 70 mg/lit Design Parameter
Pre-treatment: RO plant with spiral tube module, then pre-treatment should consist of PSF, MF and UF for bringing down SS and Turbidity at the inlet of RO Plant.
Acid Dosing, SMBS and Antiscalent dosing shall be provided in RO Plant. Recovery: 85 %
Salt Rejection: 90-92 %
10 Treated water storage tank 1
Type: RCC Circular tank Diameter: 6 m
Height: 1.5 m + 0.5 m free board Volume: 56.52 m3
Sr. No. Query Reply
3
Proposed Green belt development program along-with time line and budgetary allocation needs to be provided (40 % Green belt as per Ministry’s office memorandum 31st October, 2019)
Total area of the project site is 2010 m2 (0.201 hac.). Out which 805 m2 area shall be used for green belt development which is 40 % of the total area.Plant layout is attached as Annexure 3.
However, it is to inform you that,due to some technical error while doing online application, we were not able to change the detailson portal regarding total plot area.The actual area of the project site is 0.201 hac. (2010 m2) which is mentioned in EIA report. Moreover, land possession documents are also attached as Annexure 4.
Also Plant layout and land area break up is given as under:
LAND AREA BREAK-UP Sr.
No. Description Area (m2) % of Land Use
1 Manufacturing Area-1 135.5 6.7
2 Manufacturing Area-2 144.4 7.2
3 Raw Material Storage Area-1 43.2 2.1
4 Raw Material Storage Area-2 48.6 2.4
5 Hazardous Waste Storage Area 40.5 2.0
6 Final Product 49.9 2.5
7 ETP Area 43.2 2.1
8 Utility Area 30.6 1.5
9 Office Area 66.3 3.3
10 Parking Area 20.8 1.0
11 Security 9.0 0.4
12 Green Belt 805 40.0
13 Roads & Other Area 573 28.5
Green Belt Development Plan and Budgetary Allcation
Unit has proposed to develop green belt in 805 m2 area which is 40 % of the total plot area. The tress shall be planted in three tiers pattern so as to ensure that the entire area getscovered and ensure effective pollution abatement. For this, management shall ensurethat plantation of trees shall include mixture of lower, higher and middle canopy structure,which shall be mixed appropriately / proportionately / uniformly.
Indigenous species with fast growth are only selected or form the base of selection asGreen Belt can come in view as fast as possible.
The plantation shall also include fruit bearing trees/ species which shall be uniformlydistributed which shall act as dwelling place for Varity of birds and other fauna and forma breeding ground for them.
Care shall be taken to plant ample trees along the road side, boundary wall as well aswithin the plant premises. It shall enable proper balance of atmosphere both outside thecampus by absorbing noise and gaseous pollutants of the road side movement of vehiclesand also absorption of noise and emissions within the premises of the plant.
The non-structural actions shall be initiated with inception of commissioning stage andshall be implemented & practiced as routine throughout the project life.
As per the present project activities, it is recommended to raise the following plant species. Thesespecies can be also available near the forest department nurseries.
PLANTATION NEAR WASTE LANDS / RESERVE FORESTED AREAS / ROAD SIDE
Botanical name of Trees No. Importance planting Zone/ Suggested Direction Trees
Ficusbenghalensis
10 Shade, foodfor birds Buffer zoneFicusracemosa
10 Edible fruits Buffer zonePeltophorumpterocarpum
20 Shade Buffer zoneSamaniasaman
100 Avenue tree Buffer zoneCassia fistula
50 Avenue tree Buffer zoneDelonixregia
20 Avenue tree Buffer zoneCalophylluminophyllum
50 Shade, Medicinal Buffer zoneCasuarina equisetifolia
100 Pulp andconstructionmaterial Core zoneCallistemon citrinus
50 Ornamentaltree Core zoneCocos nucifera
20 Fruits Buffer zoneDendrocalamusstrictus
10 Bamboo Buffer zoneSyzygiumcumini
10 Fruits Buffer zoneTamarindusindica
10 Shade, fruits Buffer zoneTecomastans
20 Shade Buffer zoneTectonagrandis
100 Shade, Wood Buffer zoneTerminalia bellirica
50 Fruits, Shade Buffer zoneTermineliachebula
20 Fruits, Shade Buffer zoneBotanical name of Trees No. Importance planting Zone/ Suggested Direction
Thespeciapopulnea
10 Shade Buffer zoneThevetianeriifolia
10 Shade Buffer zoneTremaorientalis
20 Shade Buffer zoneVitex negundo
100 Shade Buffer zoneWrightiatinctoria
50 Shade Buffer zonePhyllanthus emblica
20 Fruits Buffer zonePithecellobium dulce
20 Fruits Buffer zonePlumeria alba
20 Shade Buffer zoneLIST OF TREES RECOMMENDED FOR PLNTATION WITHIN PLANT PREMISES Sr. No. Botanical Name Site No Space Each Area (m2)
A B D E F G H=E*G
1 Polyalthia longifolia (Sonn.) A1 15 3x3 9 135 2 Azadirachta indica A.Juss A1 4 5x5 25 100 3 Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de A1 15 1x1 1 15 4 Terminalia catappa L A1 10 5x5 25 250 5 Thespesia populnea (L.) A1 3 3x3 9 27 6 Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth A2 3 2x2 4 12
7 Vitex negundo L A2 3 2x2 4 12
8 Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre A2 10 3x3 9 90 9 Cascabela thevetia (L.) A2 4 2x2 4 16 10 Melaleuca citrina (Curtis) A2 3 2x2 4 12 11 Nerium odoratum Lam A3,B 3 2x2 4 12 12 Bauhinia purpurea L A3 10 2x2 4 40
13 Caryota urens L. B 4 2x2 4 16
14 Roystonea regia (Kunth) O.F.Cook B 4 2x2 4 16
15 Plumeria alba L C 3 2x2 4 12
16 Ixora coccinea L C 10 2x2 4 40
Total 104 805
Preferred site of planting codes: A1: Tall trees towards boundary wall
A2: Medium sized trees next row to A1 species A3: Small trees next row to A2 species
B: Near entrance gate and paths
PROPOSED FINANCIAL BUDGET FOR THE GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT (RS IN LAKHS)
Sr.
No. Component Year First Second Year Third Year Fourth Year Fifth Year Total
1 Plant Seeds/Saplings 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10.0
2 Pits and Watering 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.0
3 Regular Maintenance 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.0
4 Transportation 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.0
Grand Total 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0
Sr. No. Query Reply
4
PP mentioned in-adequate incremental value for PM10 & PM2.5. Air Quality Impact Prediction mentioned (18.1 of form 2) is inadequate kindly correct it.
Assessment of incremental ground level concentration of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX and NH3 is provided below using software AERMODCloud Version 18.1 (Build: 36) developed by M/S. Envitrans Consultancy Services. AERMODCloud is an integrated graphical userinterface of AERMOD, ISCST3, AERMAP and AERMET.
Details of predicted emission from proposed stack are given in following table.
Sr.
No. Parameters Operating Unit
Source of Emission
Stack Attached To Process Vent Attached To Boiler
(Stack 01)
Thermopack Unit
(Stack 02) D.G.Set
Reactor (Stack 03)
1 Stack height m 33 12 20
2 Diameter m 0.3 0.1
3 temperature Flue gas K 423 353 323
4 Air Pollution Control Equipment
As Natural Gas is Proposed as a Fuel 33 M Stack Height
Shall be Provided
12 m Stack Height Two Stage Ammonia Scrubber
5 Flue Gas Velocity m/sec 9.06 - 7
6 Flow Rate Nm3/Hr 1623.90 - 182.50
7 Concentration Emission
PM10 mg/m3 80* -
PM2.5 mg/m3 40* -
NOX mg/m3 75.2* -
NH3 mg/m3 - - 140*
8 Emission Rate
PM10 g/sec 0.03609 -
PM2.5 g/sec 0.01804 -
SO2 g/sec 0.09446 -
NOX g/sec 0.03395 -
NH3 g/sec - - 0.00710
(* Permissible Limits for Critically Polluted Area)
MODEL ISOPLETHS AND MAXIMUM INCREMENTAL GROUND LEVEL CONCENTRATIONS
Isopleths plots for the parameters – PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOX, NH3 for proposed scenario are given in below figures.
FIGURE 1 – ISOLPLETHS PLOT FOR PM10
Interpretation: Maximum incremental Ground Level Concentration for PM10 is 0.08 μg/m3 at X: 278035 m and Y: 2334129 m at 600 m distance in East direction from source of emissionas shown in above Figure 1.
FIGURE 2 – ISOPLETHS PLOT FOR PM2.5
Interpretation: Maximum incremental Ground Level Concentration for PM2.5 is 0.03 μg/m3 at X: 278135 m and Y: 2334129 m at 700 m distance in East direction from source of emission as shown in above Figure 2.
FIGURE 3 – ISOPLETHS PLOT FOR SO2
Interpretation: Maximum incremental Ground Level Concentration for SO2 is 0.13 μg/m3 at X: 278135 m and Y: 2334129 m as at 700 m distance in East direction from source ofemission shown in above Figure 3.
FIGURE 4 – ISOPLETHS PLOT FOR NOX
Interpretation: Maximum incremental Ground Level Concentration for NOX is 0.05 μg/m3 at X: 278135 m and Y: 2334129 m at 700 m distance in East direction from source of emissionas shown in above Figure 4.
FIGURE 5 – ISOPLETHS PLOT FOR NH3
Interpretation: Maximum incremental Ground Level Concentration for NH3 is 0.06 μg/m3 at X: 277635 m and Y: 2334129 m at 200 m distance in East direction from source of emission as shown in above Figure 5.
MAXIMUM INCREMENTAL GROUND EVEL CONCENRATION
Sr. No. Parameters Maximum GLC (μg/m3) Distance and Direction
1 PM10 0.08 700 m in E
2 PM2.5 0.03 700 m in E
3 SO2 0.13 700 m in E
4 NOX 0.05 700 m in E
5 NH3 0.06 200 m in E
Sr. No. Query Reply
5 In form 2 w.r.t. exemption of PH, copy of notified industrial are document needs to be uploaded.
Proposed new project is proposed at Plot No. 719, Road No. 7, Sachin GIDC, Taluka - Chorasi, District - Surat, Gujarat which is located in Notified Industrial Estate (Sachin GIDC). Thus, Public Hearing is not applicable. Notification documents for Notified Industrial Estate is attached as Annexure 5.
6
Details of Raw material and its linkage and its mitigation measure during transportation needs to be submitted (13.1 of form 2).
Details of Raw materials and its linkage along with mitigation measusres during transportation are mentioned below.
Sr.
No. Name of Raw Material Physical State Consumption (MT/Year) Suggested Source Storage Transportation Mode of BP °C MP °C
1 Acetic Acid Liquid 104.8 Pioneer Chemicals, Surat Tanks Road 118.1 16.6
2 Ammonia Liquid 3736.6 Ganesh Traders, Surat Tanks Road - -
3 Benzoic Acid Solid 822.2 Imported from abroad HDPE Bags Road 249.2 122.4
4 Benzoyl Chloride Liquid 423.5 Open Market, Sachin Tanks Road 198 -1
5 Dilute Nitric Acid Liquid 4206 Shivam Products, Ankleshwar Tanks Road 82.6 (-41.6) 6 Dilute Sulphuric Acid Liquid 832.6 Niken Traders, Pandesara Tanks Road 119 10.49 7 Hydrochloric Acid Liquid 11024.2 A B Chemicals, Vapi Harsidhi Chemicals,
Vadodara Tanks Road 108.58 (-62.2)
8 Iron Powder Solid 6860.6
Texchem Industries, Ahemedabad Thacker Pulverizing
Co., Rajkot
HDPE
Bags Road 3000 1535
9 Meta Phenylene Diamine 4 Sulfonic Acid (MPDSA) Solid 300 Imported from abroad HDPE Bags Road 284 62
10 Methanol Liquid 205.7 Open Market, Sachin Tanks Road 64.7 -97.8
11 NaOH (Caustic Lye) Liquid 205.9
A B Chemicals, Vapi Shivam Products,
Ankleshwar Tanks Road
1388 323
12 Nitric Acid Liquid 2422.7 Shivam Products, Ankleshwar Tanks Road 121 (-41.6)
Sr.
No. Name of Raw Material Physical State Consumption (MT/Year) Suggested Source Storage Transportation Mode of BP °C MP °C 14 Ortho Di Chloro Benzene (ODCB) Liquid 2800.8 Intermediates, Panoli
Panoli
Tanks Road 180 (-17.6)
15 Ortho Nitro Chloro Benzene Para Sulfonic Acid (ONCBPSA) Solid 727.2 Shri Arihant Dye-Chem, Sachin HDPE Bags Road NA NA 16 p- Nitrobenzoyl chloride (PNBC) Solid 840
Transpek Industries,
Vadodara
HDPE
Bags Road 202 70
17 p- Nitrobenzoyl chloride (PNBC) Solid 840 Jainik Industries, Ahemedabad HDPE Bags Road 205 74 18 Toluene Ortho Sulphonic Acid Para Nitro
(PNTOSA) Solid 840
Imported from
abroad HDPE Bags Waterways 500 92 19 p-Nitro Toluene (PNT) Liquid 727.2 Aarti Industries Ltd., Vapi Tanks Road 240 53 20 p-Nitrobenzoic acid (PNBA) Solid 840 Enterprises Ltd., Chemcrux
Ankleshwar
HDPE
Bags Road 270 221
21 Polycyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate (PCT) Solid 1522.9 Imported from abroad HDPE Bags Waterways NA 285 22 p-Phenylenediamine (PPD) Solid 476.5 Imported from abroad HDPE Bags Waterways 267 146
23 Soda Ash Solid 4972.8 Ramesh Trading Co., Surat HDPE Bags Road 1600 851
24 Sodium Methoxide Liquid 36 Open Market, Sachin Tanks Road 5 93
25 Sulphuric Acid Liquid 120 Niken Chemicals, Pandesara Tanks Road 270 (-35)
Sr.
No. Name of Raw Material Physical State Consumption (MT/Year) Suggested Source Storage Transportation Mode of BP °C MP °C 27 2- Chloro 5- Nitro Benzene Sulfonic Acid (PNCBOSA) Solid 300 Open Market, Sachin HDPE Bags Road NA NA 28 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid (APMS) Solid 270 Open Market, Sachin HDPE Bags Road NA NA 29 2-Chloro-5-Nitrobenzoic Acid Solid 105.2
Chemcrux Enterprises Ltd.,
Ankleshwar
HDPE
Bags Road NA 142
30 2-Methyl-2,4-pentanediol (MPD) Liquid 176.5 Open Market, Sachin Tanks Road 197 -40 31 2-Methyl-6-nitrobenzoic anhydride (MNBA) Solid 840
Chemcrux Enterprises Ltd.,
Ankleshwar
HDPE
Bags Road NA 108
32 3,5-Dinitrobenzoic Acid (DNBA) Solid 412.6 Ankur Chemicals, Rajasthan HDPE Bags Road NA 206
33 3-Nitro Benzoic Acid Solid 412.6
Shree Chemopharma,
Ankleshwar
HDPE
MITIGATION MEASURES DURING TRANSPORTATION
It is proposed to use plastic cover sheet while transporting raw materials. All safety & control measures shall be provided to prevent spill, leakand accident during transportation.
Safety Precautions during Transportation of Raw Materials by Road
Training shall be given to driver and cleaner regarding the safe driving, hazards of chemicals, emergency handling, and use of Self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) sets.
TREM card shall be kept with Tanker/Lorry. SCBA set shall be kept with Tanker/Lorry.
Fire extinguishers shall be kept with Tanker/Lorry.
Flame arrestor shall be provided to Tanker/Lorry exhaust.
Hazard Identification symbol and emergency telephone number shall be displayed as per HAZCHEM CODE.
Appropriate PPEs are kept with Tanker/Lorry. In case of leak or spill:
Source of leakage shall be checked.
Damaged containers or spilled material shall not attended without wearing appropriate protective clothing.
Leak shall be stopped, if possible to do so without risk.
Combustibles (wood, paper, oil, etc.) shall be kept away from spilled material. Safety Precautions during Unloading of Chemicals from Tanker/Truck
Priority shall be given to Tanker/truck to immediately enter the storage premises at site and shall not be kept waiting near the gate or the main road.
Security person checks License, TREM CARD, Fire extinguisher condition; SCBA set condition, Antidote Kit, required PPEs as per Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) laid down.
Following precautions are taken during unloading:
Wheel stopper shall be provided to Tanker/Lorry at unloading platform. Static Earthing shall be provided to road tanker.
Tanker unloading procedure shall be followed according to check list and implemented strictly.
Flexible SS hose connection shall be done at Tanker/Lorry outlet line. Only day time unloading shall be permitted.
Safety Precautions during Chemical Trasfer from Storage Areas to Process Plant Double mechanical seal type FLP type pump shall be provided.
Flame arrestor with breather valve shall be provided on vent line. Lightening arrestor is provided on the top of tallest structure.
Over flow system shall be provided for additional safety and it is connected to main storage tank.
NRV’s shall be provided on pump discharge line.
Double Jumper clip shall be provided to all solvent handling pipelines.
WAYS TO MINIMIZE THE MANUAL HANDLING OF THE HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS 1. Fork liftswill be used for unloading chemical barrels/carboys, their movements within
plant, handling carboys, bulk chemical bags, etc.
2. Cranes, hoists, pallet trucks, conveyors, etc. are used as per the requirement, to eliminate manual handling.
3. Lifting tools & tackles are used, wherever required. 4. SOPs, work instructions are prepared and followed.
5. Trainings are provided to relevant staff, operators, workers for the risk associated with manual handling of hazardous chemicals, ways to overcome those risk, etc.
Sr. No. Query Reply 7
TOR compliance is not adequate in EIA/EMP report and need to revise as per the terms of reference granted for the project, and shall conform to Appendix III of the EIA Notification, 2006.
Noted. Revised ToR compliance has been attached to EIA/EMP report. Same is attached in Annexure 6.
8
In form 2 Sr. No. 33, the benefit of project mentioned by PP, “Amendment in EC of Mineral Addition & Amendment in EC Production & EC Transfer for Quartz, Feldspar and Granite mining project of M/s. Shri Shyam Minerals is situated at near village - Ratanpura, Tehsil – Masuda, District – Ajmer, Rajasthan is of utmost importance to the area for interest of mineral development and improves the socio-economic conditions of the local habitants. The operation of the proposed project of Quartz, Feldspar and Granite mining will pass on various social and economic ben“. Consultant has copied and paste the details for some other project and even do not consider to recheck before submitting the documents in parivesh portal.
Benefits due to project activities are mentioned as under:
Social:
Proposed proect will generate direct/indirect employments to the local/near by area/villages. CER activities will improve the quality of nearby villagers as their need will be fulfilled.
Financial:
As products will also be exported to other countries, there will be benefit to the country due to taxation.
No. of Employments to be generated: 45
(7 Skilled, 10 Semi-skilled and 28 un-skilled)
Sir, it is to inform that, technical error is happening during online submission of proposal. Due to technical error, while uloading EIA/EMP report we were not able to change some details. Online portal was not allowing to modify the same.
9
In view of the above, PP/Consultant are requested to revise the application for grant of EC and accordingly revise the Form 2 along with EIA/EMP Report. The EIA/EMP Report shall match with the information as filled in Form 2. On examination it is observed that the Consultant has not adequately submitted the application as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006. Consultant has to read the documents before uploading the information in Form 2/EIA/EMP report.
With above changed, application has been revised. Revised Form-2 with updated details are mentioned in Annexure 7.
Also EIA report has been revised considering the above changes and uploaded online.
Annexure 1
Compliance of MoEF Circular for CPA
(Critically Polluted Area) and SPA (Severely
Compliance of Mechanism for Environmental Management of Critically Polluted Area (CPA) and Severally Polluted Area (SPA) Reference: OM F. No. 22-23/2018-IA.III (Pt.) dated: 31st October, 2019 Environm
ent Mitigation Measures Compliance
Air Stipulation of Conditions Such as:
i. Stack emission levels should be stringent than the existing standards in terms of the identified critical pollutants.
Noted and shall be complied. Unit has proposed to provide adequate Air Pollution Control Measures for flue gas and process gas emission to achieve the norms as mentioned and revised in CPA.
Flue gas emission and its proposed air pollution control measures are mentioned below:
⚫ Unit has proposed to use natural gas as a fuel for Boiler (2 MT/Hr) and Thermopack (200 U). Unit will provide 33 m common stack for Boiler & Thermopack as natural gas is proposed as fuel.
⚫ LDO shall be used for D.G. Set having capacity of 125 KVA. However, it will be used only during the emergency power cutoff.
Process gas emission and its proposed air pollution control measures are mentioned below.
⚫ Two stage ammonia scrubbers shall be provided to control emission of VOCs and NH3. More details are provided in EIA report Chapter – 2.
large/medium red category industries (air polluting) and connected to SPCB and CPCB server.
System will be installed and connected with GPCB/CPCB Server.
iii. Effective fugitive emission control measures should be imposed in the process, transportation, packaging etc.
Complied.
Unit has proposed to use natural gas a fuel for boiler (2 MT/Hr) and Thermopack (200 U).
iv. Transportation of materials by rail/conveyor belt, wherever feasible.
Unit will prefer the transportation of the materials through rail whenever it is possible. Manual handling will be utilized in minimum activities. v. Encourage use of cleaner fuels (pet
coke/ furnace oils/ LSHS may be avoided.)
Noted. Unit has proposed to use natural gas a fuel. LDO will be used in DG Set and which shall be used only during emergency power cutoff. vi. Best Available Technology may be
used. For example, usage of EAF/SAF/IF in place of cupola furnace. Usage of supercritical technology in place of sub-critical technology.
Unit will comply the condition and use best available technology to increase yield and minimize quantity of waste. Unit has also explored the technology of continuous reactor process in place of batch process for their some of the products to maximize the yield and minimize the pollution.
vii. Increase of Green belt cover by 40% of the total land area beyond the permissible requirement of 33%, wherever feasible.
Complied. Unit has proposed to develop 40 % green belt within the plant premises. However, there is existing structure available at the project site. Unit will modify it according to the need.
viii. Stipulation of greenbelt outside the project premises such as avenue plantation, plantation in vacant areas, social forestry, etc.
Unit has proposed to develop 40 % green belt within the plant premises. Total area of the project site is 2010 m2. And area proposed for the green belt development is 805 m2. ix. Assessment of carrying capacity of
transportation load on roads inside the industrial premises. If roads required to be widened, shall be prescribed as a condition.
Project location is in well-established GIDC of Sachin having adequate infrastructure facilities. Unit has also proposed to provide 4 m wide road within the plant area.
i. Reuse/Recycle of treated wastewater, wherever feasible.
Unit has proposed ZLD system for wastewater management. Entire effluent generated from industrial activity shall be send to inhouse MEE plant followed by biological treatment and RO plant. RO permeate water shall be reused within plant premises itself. And RO reject water shall be again sent back to MEE plant.
ii. Continuous Monitoring of effluent quality/ quantity in large and medium red category industries (water polluting).
Noted and unit will comply the condition as per standards.
Unit will install flow meters as inlet and out of ETP. Regular monitoring will be carried out to check the quality of effluent. Unit will provide COD, pH sensor at final outlet for continuous analysis.
iii. A detailed water harvesting plan may be submitted by the project proponent.
Water Harvesting plan is provided in EIA report Chapter – 2.
iv. Zero Liquid Discharge wherever techno-economically feasible.
Unit has proposed Zero Liquid Discharge for wastewater management.
Total water requirement is 45 KL/Day. Out of which unit will recycle and reuse 23 KL/Day water through MEE plant followed by biological treatment and RO plant. Thus, fresh water demand shall be reduced to 22 KL/Day.
Domestic wastewater shall be disposed through septic tank/soak pit system.
v. In case, domestic waste water generation is more than 10 KLD, Industry may install STP.
Domestic waste water generation shall be 4.5 KLD and shall disposed through septic tank/soak pit.
Land Stipulation of Conditions Such as:
i. Increase of Green belt cover by 40% of the total land area beyond the permissible requirement of
Unit has proposed to develop 40 % green belt within the plant premises. Total area of the project site is 2010
33%, wherever feasible. m2. And area proposed for the green belt development is 805 m2. ii. Stipulation of greenbelt outside the
project premises such as avenue plantation, plantation in vacant areas, social forestry, etc.
Unit has proposed to develop 40 % green belt within the plant premises. Total area of the project site is 2010 m2. And area proposed for the green belt development is 805 m2. iii. Dumping of waste (fly ash, slag,
red mud, etc.) may be permitted only at designated locations approved by SPCBs/CPCBs.
Unit will send Hazardous waste to approved TSDF site only.
All the waste will be disposed of as per Solid and hazardous waste management.
More details are provided in EIA report Chapter – 2.
iv. More stringent norms for management of hazardous waste. The waste generated should be preferably utilized in co-processing.
Noted.
The details for management of hazardous waste are provided in EIA report Chapter – 2.
Other Condition (Additional)
Stipulation of Conditions Such as:
i. Monitoring of compliance of EC conditions may be submitted with third party audit every year.
Noted. Unit shall Comply the condition.
ii. The % of CER may be at least 1.5 times the slabs given in OM dated 01.05.2018 for SPA and 2 times for CPA in case of Environment Clearance.
The unit has proposed to spend nearly
₹
37,00,000/-
Budget (4 % of the total cost₹
9.25 Crores) for social development programs under CER activities for the next 5 years. More details are provided in EIA report Chapter – 8.Annexure 2
ENPRO Enviro Tech and Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Treatability Study Report for M/s. Orgo Chem (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. INTRODUCTION
Orgo Chem (Guj) Pvt. Ltd. is proposing to set up a new manufacturing unit of dye intermediate and specialty chemical products @ 170.5 MT/Month at Block No. 719, Road No. 7, Sachin GIDC, Surat, Gujarat. Unit has purchased entire plot with existing infrastructure having constructed building and other utilities. Total generated industrial waste water 30 KL/Day shall be treated in proposed MEE plant. Industrial effluent shall be sent to inhouse MEE plant followed by biological treatment and RO plant. RO permeate water shall be reused within plant premises itself and RO reject water shall be again sent back to MEE plant.
1) Concentrated effluent stream – 30 KL/Day
A detailed treatability study is carried out to identify optimum dosing of various treatment chemicals.
1. FOR CONCENTRATED EFFLUENT STREAM
Effluent generated during manufacturing process and other utility operations shall be sent to inhouse MEE plant followed by biological plant and RO plant. Permeate water from RO plant shall be recycle and reused back within plant premises and RO reject water shall be again sent back to MEE plant.
Characteristic of composite sample is given below:
TABLE 1 – EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (CONCENTRATED STREAM)
No. Parameter Composite Sample
(Considering Worst Case Scenario)
1 pH 2.5
2 COD, mg/l 34561
3 BOD, mg/l 11234
4 Total Dissolved Solids, mg/l 44895
5 Suspended Solids, mg/l 986
LABORATORY TREATABILITY STUDIES
Laboratory scale pilot study was carried out on the composite effluent having characteristics as mentioned in Table 4. A summarized result of study is reported in this section.
Distillation
Initially sample was neutralized using caustic for further distillation treatment. Lab scale analysis was done for distillation process.
Initially 500 ml of sample was treated through distillation at control temperature in the range from 50 ℃ to 80 ℃.
Further to this, the same flask was further heated at 105 ℃ and distillate was collected and analysed to check the parameters of the sample. Summary of the result is tabulated herewith in Table 2.
ENPRO Enviro Tech and Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Treatability Study Report for M/s. Orgo Chem (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd.
TABLE 2 – SUMMARY OF DISTILLATION PROCESS
Parameters Run 1 Run 2
Volume of sample, ml 500 500
TDS (mg/lit)
Influent (KL) 44895 44895
Effluent (KL) 1347 449
% removal 97 99
BOD (mg/lit)
Influent (KL) 11234 11234
Effluent (KL) 1011 640
% removal 91 94.3
COD (mg/lit)
Influent (KL) 34561 34561
Effluent (KL) 5081 3456
% removal 85.3 90
OBSERVATION:
Based on laboratory scale pilot plant study, following observations can be made,
1. Analysis of effluent sample from individual industries and composite sample suggest following ranges:
a. pH – < 4
b. COD – 30000-35000 mg/l c. BOD – 75000-8750 mg/l d. TDS – 40000-45000 mg/l e. SS – 100-1000 mg/l
2. Initially neutralization was done to get pH in the range from 6.5 to 8.5 and further distillation was provided. After distillation at lab scale, it is observed that, Total dissolved solids level is reduced upto 99%, COD level is reduced up to 90 % and BOD level is reduced up to 94.3 %.
Annexure 3
Plant Layout
STATEMENT OF AREAS
S.N
DESCRIPTION
AREA (sq.m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 144.4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 SECURITY 9.0 2010 TOTAL SITE AREA
% OF LAND USE
MANUFACTURING AREA-1 135.5 6.7
7.2 43.2
RAW MATERIAL STORAGE AREA-1 2.1
48.6
HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE AREA 2.0
2.4 40.5
FINAL PRODUCT 49.9 2.5
UTILITY AREA 30.6 1.5
28.5 573
GREEN BELT 805 40.0
0.4
PARKING AREA 20.8 1.0
ROADS & OTHER AREA
100.00
SECURITY
3 m x 3 m
GATE
PARKING AREA
7.7 m x 2.7 m
MANUFACTURING AREA - 1
13.5m x 10m
OFFICE AREA
8.5 m x 7.8 m
MANUFACTURING AREA - 2
19 m x 7.6 m
UTILITY
AREA
9.3 m x
3.3 m
ETP
AREA
13.1 m x
3.3 m
RAW MATERIAL
STORAGE AREA-1
9 m x 4.8 m
RAW MATERIAL
AREA-2
10.8 m x 4.5 m
HAZ. WASTE
STORAGE AREA
9.0 m x 4.5 m
FINAL PRODUCT
STORAGE AREA
11.1 m x 4.5 m
4 m WIDE ROAD
4
m
W
ID
E
R
O
A
D
4
m
W
ID
E
R
O
A
D
4
m
W
ID
E
R
O
A
D
MANUFACTURING AREA-2RAW MATERIAL STORAGE AREA-2
ETP AREA 43.2 2.1
OFFICE AREA 66.3 3.3
GATE
RAIN WATER
HARVESTING
Annexure 4
Annexure 5
Date: 08/04/2020
To,
The Member Secretary, Expert Appraisal Committee, (Industrial Projects - II),
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Indira Paryavaran Bhavan,
Jor Bagh Road, New Delhi - 110 003
Subject: Public hearing is exempted for Orgo Chem (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. located at Plot No. 719,
Road No. 7, Sachin GIDC, Surat, Gujarat. Dear Sir,
With reference to above subject, proposed new project location for Orgo Chem (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. is in Notified Industrial estate, Sachin GIDC. Due to the same public hearing is not applicable for this project.
Thanking You.
Enclosure:
Annexure 6
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
1 Executive Summary Orgo Chem (Guj) Pvt. Ltd. is proposing to set up a new manufacturing unit of dye intermediate and specialty chemical products @ 170.5 MT/Month at Plot No. 719, Road No. 7, Sachin GIDC, Surat, Gujarat.
Proposed project shall be located in 2010 m2 area. In which, 805 m2 (40 % of the total plot area) shall be allotted to green belt development.
Total water requirement for the proposed project is 45 KL/Day which shall be sourced from Sachin GIDC. Total wastewater generation shall be 34.5 KL/Day. Unit will recycle and reuse 23 KL/Day water from MEE plant.
Total power requirement shall be 200 KVA which shall be sourced from DGVCL.
Total employment generation due to proposed project shall be 45.
Capital cost for the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) will be Rs. 288 Lakhs.
Recurring cost for the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) will be 146.1 Lakhs.
Funds for the Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER) will be Rs. 37 Lakhs. Total capital cost of the project is Rs. 9.25 Crores.
2 Introduction
I. Details of the EIA Consultant including
NABET accreditation EIA Consultant Name:
ENPRO Enviro Tech and Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
NABET/EIA/1922/RA 0122 valid till 12th January, 2022
Approved Sectors and Category:
1. Metallurgical industries (ferrous & non-ferrous) - Cat. A
2. Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dye & dye intermediates; bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug formulations; synthetic rubber; basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates) - Cat. A
3. Common hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities (TSDFs) - Cat. A
4. Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETPs) - Cat. B
5. Common Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility (CMSWMF) - Cat. B
6. Bio Medical Waste Treatment Facilities - Cat. B
7. Chlor alkali Industry - Cat. B
8. Isolated Storage and Handling of hazardous chemicals - Cat. B
9. Cement Plants – Cat A 10.Power Plants – Cat. A
Contact Details:
Email id: [email protected]
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
Address: 306, Royal Park, Nr. Deepa
Complex, Adajan Road, Surat, Gujarat – 395 009
II. Information about the project
proponent Orgo Chem (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. is promoted by Mr. Paras Mehta who is having more than 25 years of experience in the field of chemical industry especially in Dye intermediate products. The promoter is already having a unit of dye intermediate products in Sachin GIDC which is under operation for more than two decades.
List of directors for the proposed project is given in Section 1.4 on page no. 1.2 in chapter 1.
III. Importance and benefits of the project The global and local market for dye intermediates has been witnessing significant growth due to rising demand from end-user industries. Based on this requirement, the company proposes to install a new plant which will benefit the country and region. Also, based on informal survey of the market with their existing customers and various traders, company has found that there is a big potential for the range of the proposed products which will directly help to grow the market of Indian products worldwide.
More details are given in Section 1.5.1 on page no. 1.4 in chapter 1.
3 Project Description
I. Cost of project and time of completion. Total cost for the proposed project is Rs. 9.25 Crores. CA Certificate is attached as Annexure V. Proposed Project activities are likely to start after getting Environmental Clearance from EAC, Delhi and NOC/CTE from GPCB.
Proposed schedule for approval and implementation is given in Section 2.5 on page no. 2.11 in chapter 2.
II. Products with proposed project. Production capacity of the proposed project will be 170.5 MT/Month.
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
List of proposed products with their manufacturing capacity per month is given in Table 2.3 in Section 2.4 on page no. 2.4 in chapter 2.
III. If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and whether adequate land is available for expansion,
reference of earlier EC if any.
Proposed project is new project.
However, Company has purchased a land with existing construction available within plot and they have proposed to modify the same as per requirement.
IV. List of raw materials required and their source along with mode of transportation.
List of raw material required with quantity and their source along with mode of transportation is given in Table 2.8 on page no. 2.19 in Section 2.6.1 in chapter 2.
V. Other chemicals and materials required
with quantities and storage capacities Other chemicals required for dosing in effluent treatment plant will be sourced from local market and will be stored in raw material storage area. Unit has proposed to provide 71.8 m2 area for raw material storage.
VI. Details of Emission, effluents,
hazardous waste generation and their management.
Air Pollution:
Unit has proposed to install Boiler having capacity of 2 MT/Hr and Thermopack having capacity of 200 U. Unit has proposed natural gas as a fuel for both utilities. Common stack with 33 m shall be provided to Boiler and Thermopack.
D.G. Set having capacity of 125 KVA shall be kept for emergency power back up. LDO (600 Liters/Day) will be used as a fuel for D.G. Set.
Details for the same are given in Section 2.7 on page no. 2.22 in chapter 2.
Wastewater Management:
Unit has proposed ZLD system for wastewater management.
Total water requirement for the proposed project is 45 KL/Day (37 KL/Day for
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
Industrial + 5 KL/Day for Domestic + 3 KL/Day for Gardening).
Total wastewater generation is 34.5 KL/Day (30 KL/Day + 4.5 KL/Day Domestic).
Entire industrial wastewater (30 KL/Day) shall be send to stripper followed by MEE plant, biological treatment and RO plant. 23 KL/Day RO permeate water shall be reused within the plant premises itself and RO reject water shall be again sent back to MEE plant. This way, fresh water demand for the proposed project shall be reduced to 22 KL/Day from 45 KL/Day.
Domestic wastewater (4.5 KL/Day) shall be disposed through septic tank / soak pit system.
Details for the same are given in section on page no. 2.23 in chapter 2.
Hazardous waste management
Hazardous waste shall be disposed of to TSDF site / recyclable waste shall be sent to authorized recycler as per Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.
Details for the same are given in section on page no. 2.32 in chapter 2.
VII. Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram, man-power requirement (regular and contract)
Water Requirement:
Total water requirement for the proposed project is 45 KL/Day (37 KL/Day for Industrial + 5 KL/Day for Domestic + 3 KL/Day for Gardening).
Details for the same are given in section 2.8 on page no. 2.23 in chapter 2.
Water balance diagram is presented as Figure 2.2 on page no. 2.25 in chapter 2.
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
Power Requirement:
Total power requirement for proposed project will be 200 KVA and shall be sourced from Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited (DGVCL). To meet the emergency power requirement for critical operations for ensuring safety, 01 D.G. Set having capacity 125 KVA will be kept as standby power back up.
Details of the same are given in Section 2.4.1.3 on page no. 2.8 in chapter 2.
VIII. Process description along with major equipments and machineries, process flow sheet (quantitative) from raw material to products to be provided
Details of manufacturing process along with chemical reaction and mass balance is given in Annexure I.
Details of major equipments are given in Table 2.5 in section 2.4.1.5 on page no. 2.9 in chapter 2.
Unit will install Boiler (2 MT/Hr), Thermopack (200 U) and D.G. Set (Stand By) (125 KVA). There shall be installation of RO plant, Stripper, MEE plant, biological treatment units in ETP.
IX. Hazard identification and details of
proposed safety systems. Details of hazardous identification are given in Section 7.2 on page no. 7.6 in chapter 7. Qualitative Risk Assessment has been carried out for the proposed project. In this, risk has been analyzed using methodology called HIRA-Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment. In HIRA, major manual activities carried out by plant personnel as well as contract labors have been considered.
Qualitative risk assessment is given in section 7.2.1 on page no. 7.6 in chapter 7. X. Expansion/modernization proposals:
Copy of all the Environmental
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
thereto obtained for the project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure. A certified copy of the latest Monitoring Report of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests as per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions stipulated in all the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be provided. In addition, status of compliance of Consent to Operate for the ongoing existing operation of the project from
SPCB shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report.
In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance, reasons for not taking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and/or EIA Notification 2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to Establish/No Objection Certificate and Consent to Operate (in case of units operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE and CTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be submitted. Further, compliance report to the conditions of consents from the SPCB shall be submitted.
Not applicable as proposed project is new project.
4 Site Details
I. Location of the project site covering village, Taluka/Tehsil, District and State, Justification for selecting the site, whether other sites were considered.
Proposed project shall be located at Plot no. 719, Road No. 7, Sachin GIDC, Surat, Gujarat.
Nearest town: Sachin (approx. 3 km) District: Surat
Nearest water body: Mindhola River (approx. 5.45 km (S))
Nearest High way: National Highway No. 53 (Old NH 6) (approx. 1.08 km (NE))
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
Nearest railway station: Sachin railway station (approx. 2.45 km (SE))
Nearest airport: Surat airport (approx. 12.76 km (NW))
Note: Above distances are aerial distances.
More details are provided in Section 2.3 on page no. 2.1 in chapter 2.
Justification for selecting the site:
The main reason behind selection of this site is availability of existing construction facility in the well-established in Sachin GIDC. So, there is no alternative site was examined for the proposed project.
More details are provided in section 5.1 on page no. 5.1 in chapter 5.
II. A toposheet of the study area of radius of 10 km and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet. (including all eco-sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places)
A toposheet of the study area of radius of 10 km and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet is presented in Map 3.2 on page no. 3.37 in chapter 3.
III. Details w.r.t. option analysis for
selection of site Details about analysis of alternative site are given in section 5.1 on page no. 5.1 in chapter 5.
IV. Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all
four corners of the site. Geographical location of the project site: Latitude: 21°5'41.00"N
Longitude: 72°51'27.00"E Coordinates of the boundary:
Point Latitude Longitude
A 21° 5'42.11"N 72°51'25.19"E B 21° 5'41.69"N 72°51'27.56"E C 21° 5'40.70"N 72°51'27.38"E D 21° 5'41.05"N 72°51'25.07"E -
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
Boundary is given in section 2.3.2 in on page no. 2.3 in chapter 2.
V. Google map-Earth downloaded of the
project site. Specific location of the project site on google earth is given as Map 2.2 on page no. 2.3 in chapter 2.
VI. Layout maps indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an Industrial area/Estate/Complex, layout of Industrial Area indicating location of unit within the Industrial area/Estate.
Total plot area of the project site is 2010 m2. Company has purchased a land with existing construction available within plot and they have proposed to modify the same as per requirement.
Area proposed for Green belt development is 805 m2 (40 m2 of the total plot area)
Manufacturing area shall be located in 279.9 m2, Raw material storage area shall be located in 71.8 m2, hazardous waste storage area shall be located in 40.5 m2, final product storage area shall be located in 49.9 m2, ETP/MEE area shall be located in 43.2 m2, remaining area will covered utility area, office area, security, parking etc. Plant layout is presented in Figure 2.2 and Annexure III. Area break up is presented in Table 2.4 on page no. 2.8 in chapter 2. VII. Photographs of the proposed
and existing (if applicable) plant site. If existing, show photographs of plantation/greenbelt, in particular.
Photographs of the project site are showing in Figure 2.1 on page no. 2.6 in chapter 2. VIII. Landuse break-up of total land of the
project site (identified and acquired), government/private - agricultural, forest, wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc shall be included. (not required for industrial area)
Mostly area is covered with fallow land 33 %, water bodies are located in 10 %, mud area is located in 19 %, plantation is located in 4%.
Land use break up is presented in Table 3.14 in section 3.7.5.4 on page no. 3.54 in chapter 3.
IX. A list of major industries with name and type within study area (10km radius) shall be incorporated. Land use details of the study area
Project site is proposed within notified industrial area of Sachin GIDC, District: Surat. Sachin GIDC consist of approximately 65 textile processing industries, approximately 45 different chemical manufacturing units and many numbers of textile weaving units. Most of the industries
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
located within Sachin GIDC are small and medium scale industries.
Land use break up for the study area is presented in Table 3.14 in section 3.7.5.4 on page no. 3.54 in chapter 3.
X. Geological features and Geo- hydrological status of the study area shall be included.
Geographically, the Surat district belongs to the western coastlands of the Deccan peninsula. The area is mainly characterized by the alluvial plains comprising the flood plains of the Tapi and Mindhola rivers.
Geology
The geological formations encountered in the Surat district are of Quaternary alluvium, Tertiary limestone and sandstone, and Deccan Trap basalt.
Details of the same are given in section 3.9.5 on page no. 3.68 in chapter 3.
Hydrology
The major aquifers in the study area are mainly formed by alluvium and Tertiary formations. The common ground water abstraction structures are dug wells, dug- cum-bore wells and tube wells. The yields mainly depend on the recharge conditions. The depths of the wells in alluvium generally range from 3.0 to 20.0 and some even 25.0 m. Some of the dug wells have in-well bores down to >30 m. Depths to water levels in the area range from 0.5 to 15 m bgl about 90% wells shows water levels less than 10m bgl.
More details regarding the same is given in section 3.9.6 on page no. 3.70 in chapter 3. XI. Details of Drainage of the project upto
5 km radius of study area. If the site is within 1 km radius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency
The area is regionally dissected by perennial and intermittent rivers, streams and streamlets, and forming part of either Tapi or Mindhola River Systems comprising the flood plains deposits. The drainage pattern
Sr.
No. Standard Terms of References Compliances
based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of the project site and maximum Flood Level of the river shall also be provided. (mega green field
projects)
in general is sub- dendritic. Both the rivers merge west of the study area before culminating into the Arabian Sea. The Tapi is the major river which passes through the central parts of the district and flows towards the west. The river is perennial in nature.
More details area given in section 3.9.4 on page no. 3.67 in chapter 3.
XII. Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition process and expected time of complete possession of the land.
Orgo Chem (Guj) Pvt. Ltd. has purchased a land from M/s. Siddhnath Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. This was manufacturing different type of yarns and threads. However, units has shut down its facility and sell the plot having total area of 2010 m2 with existing building constructed on 1300 m2 area to Orgo Chem (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. Land documents mentioning the same is enclosed as Annexure II.
XIII. R&R details in respect of land in line with state Government policy.
R&R is not applicable as proposed project site is located in Notified Industrial Area (Sachin GIDC).
5 Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable):
I. Permission and approval for the use of forest land (forestry clearance), if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Department. (if applicable)
Not applicable as proposed project site is located in notified industrial area (sachin GIDC). So, no forest or wildlife clearance is required as, wildlife sanctuary and national parks are not found within 10 km radius from the project site.
II. Landuse map based on High resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineating the forestland (in case of projects involving forest land more than
40 ha)
Not applicable as there is no forest land is located within 10 km radius of the project site.
III. Status of Application submitted for obtaining the stage I forestry clearance along with latest status shall be submitted.
Not applicable as there is no forest land is located within study area.
IV. The projects to be located within 10 km of the National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project
Not applicable.
No National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild
