TIPP
Usage
Leonard Krassner, MD
Fran t! D3artinent o( iatrics, Yale (Jniveslty School of Medicine, N Haven, CI
ABSTRACT. In recent years, physicians have become more concerned about the prevention of childhood sod-dents. Developed to help physicians teach parents how
to avoid unintentional injury, The Injury Prevention Program (TIPP) is significant because anticipatory
guid-ance has now been recognized as being as much a part of
routine health supervision as the history and physical
eaminatjon. The American Academy of Pediatrics’
pol-icy statement enclosed with each TIPP package states
five goals that deal with major causes of childhood
mor-tality; three can be achieved with a single purchase or
action-buying a smoke alarm, buying a bottle of ipecac,
and turning down hot water temperathre. TIPP com-prises three elements A parent questionnaire (the Fram-ingbam safety survey) is used to identify at-risk behavior.
Safety sheets to be handed out at the next visit reinforce
the information provided by the physician in his or her discussion of the questionnaire results. A model
counsel-ing schedule suggests how to incorporate the
question-naire and safety sheets into an effective office program.
By gradually phasing TIPP into an office practice,
phy-sicians can become familiar with TIPP materials and
integrate it in a controlled manner. The AAP COmmittee
on Accident and Poison Prevention is studying measures
to increase the usefulness of TIPP. Pediatrics
l9M;74(suppl):976-980 patient education, The Injury
Prevention Program (TIPP), anticipatory guidance, Frwningham safety survey.
In the past several years, there has been a
sig-nificant change in the medical profession’s attitude
toward the prevention ofchildhood accidents.
Prac-titioners who previously focused their attention
almost exclusively on the consequences of
trau-matic events have broadened their concern to
en-compass causative elements that can lead to serious injury and death.
Led by such diverse groups as the American
Read before the Symposium on Pediatric Patient Education:
Challenge for the SOs, Dallas, Nov 29-30, 1983.
Reprint requests to (LK.) 116 Sherman Aye, New Haven, CT
06511.
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 1984 by the
American Academy ofPediatrics.
Academy of Pediatrics and its Committee on
Acci-dent and Poison Prevention, the Physicians for
Automotive Safety, National Safety Council, and
various agencies of the federal government, a loose
coalition has evolved to deal with the tragic problem
of accidental injury and death.
It would seem reasonable to expect that the
mag-nitude ofthe unintentional injury problem, whether
measured in terms of morbidity and mortality,
eco-nomic costs, or human suffering, would lead to a
vigorous national response. For reasons stifi
diffi-cult to understand, however, no coordinated
re-sponse has evolved to end this needless loss of life.
One possible explanation for the medical
profes-sion’s lack of interest in the problem is the almost
complete absence of accident prevention in the
curricula of the vast majority of the nation’s
medi-cal schools. Students receive their degrees without
ever seeing academicians, their most important role
models, recognize the importance of anticipatory
guidance for the prevention of injury by giving it a
permanent place in the curriculum. It was a
“logi-cal” assumption, therefore, that “real doctors”
corn-mitted their professional efforts to treating disease
and that prevention was the province of health
educators, the media, and the National Safety Council.
Another cultural factor has been our society’s
inclination to label unintentional death and injury
as “accidents.” And because accidents are the result
of “bad luck” or an “act of God,” it would be both
presumptuous and a waste of effort to attempt to
study them.
A more recent view, however, has been that it is
difficult to study a so-called accident and not be
able to identify a number of factors that could have
significantly modified or eliminated the uninten-tional trauma that resulted.
BACKGROUND
One of the first indications that organized
SUPPLEMENT 977
prevention came with the AAP’s national program,
“First Ride/A Safe Ride.” The goal of this effort
was to have, by 1983, 75% of newborns born in the
United States going home from the hospital in
approved infant seat restraints.
At the same time that the Academy was dealing
with automobile safety, the DHHS was working on
a program called the “Injury Prevention Project.”
Its purpose was to conceive and develop a variety
of approaches that could be used by both
govern-mental agencies and private practitioners in injury
prevention. During the fmal phases of this project,
it was decided to invite the AAP Committee on
Accident and Poison Prevention to discuss whether
any of the Injury Prevention Project’s efforts might
be suitable for incorporation into an already
estab-lished or anticipated program.
During this meeting, three items were determined
to be applicable to pediatric practice: a set of three
age-appropriate questionnaires (the Framngham
safety survey); a set of four developmentally
ori-ented handouts dealing with the major causes of
childhood injury; and a model counseling schedule
for incorporating the sheets and questionnaire into
an organized, reproducible, and effective office
pro-gram.
The joint meeting then produced a policy
state-ment (Table 1) that was presented to and approved
by the Academy’s Executive Board. Thus, The
In-jury Prevention Program (“TIPP”) was conceived.
TIPP
The significance of the Executive Board’s
state-ment was not that it introduced new concepts in
the management of unintentional injury. The
sig-nificance was that anticipatory guidance for injury
prevention was now as much a part of routine
TABLE 1. Policy Statement on Injury Prevention
Ap-proved by the Executive Board of the American Academy of Pediatrics
All children should grow up in a safe environment
Anticipatory guidance for injury prevention should be
an integral part of the medical care provided for all
infants and children
All physicians caring for children should advise parents
to acquire for their children’s safety: 1. Currently approved child car restraints
2. Smoke detectors in the home that would protect the
child’s sleeping area
3. Safe hot water temperatures at the tap
4. Window and stairway guards/gates to prevent falls
5. A 30-mL (1-oz) bottle of syrup of ipecac.
In addition, all physicians caring for children should counsel parents in age-appropriate, season-appropriate,
and locality-appropriate prevention strategies that
re-duce common serious injuries. Medical records should
reflect this counsel.
health supervision as the history and physical
ex-amination. Physicians were now mandated to teach,
and patients not only could expect but were entitled
to learn from their pediatrician what they should
do to avoid unintentional injury.
The five goals stated in the policy statement were
highlighted because all deal with major causes of
morbidity and mortality and three of the five goals
can be achieved by a single purchase or action.
Purchasing a smoke alarm, purchasing a bottle of
ipecac, and turning down hot water temperatures
are all maneuvers that effectively reduce the chance
of injury.
Designing the first stage of the program to focus
on the first 4 years of life makes use of the unique
relationship physicians share with parents of young
children. Capitalizing on the pediatrician’s ability
to modify parental behavior, the program aims to
establish patterns early in life that will carry over
as the child grows older.
The most important step in incorporating TJPP
into a practice is to acknowledge that anticipatory
guidance is an essential part of pediatric practice
and that you want to make it part of your office
routine. The next step, and this is essential to a
successful effort, is to educate your office staff as
to why it is important that parents be made aware
of their responsibility in accident prevention. Once
this is done, you can deal with the mechanics of
incorporating TIPP into your health supervision
routine with minimal disruption to your usual office
format.
FRAMINGHAM SAFETY SURVEY
The Framingham safety survey consists of three
sheets of questions that concentrate on the major
causes of morbidity and mortality during the first
4 years of life. Attached to each color-coded sheet
is a specially treated second sheet which transfers
from the top sheet only those responses that
mdi-cate some at-risk behavior (Figure).
The three questionnaires, colored blue, yellow,
and green, are designed to cover a broad range of
safety-related topics and are oriented for ages, 2,
15, and 24 months. The appropriate form is
pre-sented to the parent once the infant is in the
examining room and before the physician arrives.
The nurse explains to the parent that the survey is
not a test but rather a new program to promote
injury prevention.
Use of the questionnaire offers an interesting
variation to the “active doctor-passive patient” type
of teaching. Here the patient (parent) must take a
more active role and is asked to think about
poten-tial problem situations and how to deal with them.
Experience during development of the
at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 7, 2020
www.aappublications.org/news
PARENT COPY AND PHYSICIANS
SCREENING COPY OF
ThE FRAMINGHAM SAFETY SURVEYS
FIRST
PAGE-FOR PARENTAL RESPONSES
FRAMIPIGHAM SAFETY SURVEY
TFflt wLi
b
-, , 2 I97’ , , Appropriate responses are not
transferred
to the second page.\
‘
“At risk” responses are
transferred
and \‘ %
require discussion.
S
SECOND PAGE- \
FOR PHYSICIAN SCREENING \
k .‘
:
S Si!c!/
Pm\1- ‘4 s,’s$
%,
,. I
.,-w,
2 ,
Figure. Framingham safety survey.
naires has shown that it takes a parent about three
minutes to fill out the form and the physician (once
he is familiar with the materials) about the same
length of time to go over the at-risk answers.
Al-though most pediatricians will already have the
necessary body of knowledge to discuss the areas
covered by the survey, it has become apparent that
some expository material covering all the elements
of the program is needed. To fill this need, a short
brochure discussing the components of the program
is being prepared. It will accompany each order of
TIPP materials and will also be available on request
from the Academy.
During the discussion in the office, points will
arise that can be most effectively communicated by
the use of appropriate written material. Some of
these, such as the management of choking, can be
copied from the Academy’s first-aid chart.
Single-sheet discussions on safe bicycling, fire
emergen-cies, babysitting tips, etc, are also available from
the Academy’s publication office.
At the close of the discussion, a helpful way to
reinforce what has been discussed is to circle the
at-risk answers on the top sheet and allow the
parent to take the top sheet home for review. The
second sheet is filed in the patient’s chart as a
record of the discussion.
An appropriate notation on the immunization
sheet or some similar place on the patient’s chart
makes it easy for the office staff to determine which
patients have received the appropriate material.
When first starting to use the TIPP materials, it
is important that the nursing staff integrate it in a
controlled manner. In the early stages, the focus
should be on the older children who don’t come
into the office often. Because the frequency of
routine visits decreases progressively after the first
birthday, the focus should be on reaching as many
2- to 3-year-old childre and 15-month-old infants
as possible during the period that the program is
being introduced into the practice. This phasing-in
process smoothes that short period necessary to
become familiar with the TIPP materials.
Once the physician is assured that the presence
of a questionnaire attached to the chart of the next
TABLE 2. Tips on Incorporating The Injury
Preven-tion Program (TIPP) into Office Practice
1. The use of a clipboard with a pen attached makes it
easier for the parent to fill out the questionnaire.
2. Have your nurse emphasize to parents that they
must cross out their answers. If a circle is used, the
special paper may read all answers and not just those at risk.
3. Instruct parents to write only on the top sheet
(some look at the second sheet and think the carbon
is not working).
4. Incorporate with the questionnaire any handouts
that you have previously used for home review.
5. From such sources as the AAP first-aid chart, copy
pertinent sections such as what to do for choking. Distribute these items when an at-risk situation is
present.
6. Periodic reminders to your nursing staff will
under-score your aim to incorporate TIPP as a permanent
addition to your practice.
7. Don’t just hand out a TIPP safety sheet. Discuss
why the child is different at a particular age level
and why the parents must rethink protective
mea-sures. Demonstrate your concern.
8. During the initial use of TIPP and until you are familiar with the questionnaire, it is suggested that
you not try to incorporate it into the entire practice
at once. Space “TIPP patients” out.
9. When introducing the program, give first priority to
the 2-to 4-year-olds who come for health
supervi-sion visits less frequently.
10. Decide on a method of recording on the chart folder
sheet the parts of the program that have been given
TABLE 3. Early Childhood Safety Counseling Schedule for Well-Child Visits
Age Minimal Safety COunseling
Introduce Reinforce Materials
2 mo
4
mo6 mo
9mo
lyr
15 mo
18 mo
2yr
3yr
4yr Specific to need
SUPPLEMENT 979
patient will not disrupt the schedule, he or she is
ready to introduce TIPP to all appropriate age
groups. Depending on the make-up of the practice,
it may take more than 6 months to introduce the
age-appropriate materials to each patient.
SAFETY SHEETS
TIPP’s second component is a series of four
sheets on child safety. Three of these sheets are
color-coded to correspond to the questionnaires:
blue for the visit at age 2 months, yellow for the
visit at age 15 months, and green for the visit at
age 24 months. The fourth sheet, not matching a
survey sheet, is colored tan and is directed toward
the 6- to 12-month age group. The material covered
in these sheets is confined to the six leading causes
of morbidity and mortality in the early years of life:
motor vehicle accidents, choking, falls, drowning,
fires, and poisonings.
Most educators are convinced that the simple act
of distributing an information sheet will not
effec-tively change human behavior. Experience with
TIPP has done nothing to modify this concept. A
handout with no professional input is, in all
prob-ability, a waste of effort. Patients being treated by
physicians in private practice generally respond to
advice that they feel reflects the significant
con-cerns of their doctor. Thus, age-specific, seasonally
oriented, economically appropriate advice
pre-sented verbally and reinforced by the use of
effec-tive written material has proven an effective
method of patient teaching.
The safety sheets, although they may be used
alone, are intended as boosters to the “primary
sensitization” of the questionnaires. At the health
supervision visit following the use of the
question-naire, the safety sheet ofthe matching color is given
to the parent. At this time, emphasis should be
Prenatal/ Infant car seat
newborn Smoke detector
Crib safety 2to4wk Falls
Burns-hot liquids
Choking
Poison
Burns-hot surface
Water safety Toddler car seat
Specific to
need-Optional
Falls-play equipment,
tricycles
Automobile-pedestrian
Infant car seat Infant car seat Falls
Infant car seat Falls
Burns-hot liquids
Falls
Burns-hot liquids
Poison Falls Burns
Poison
Falls Burns
Poison
Falls
Burns
Automobile-retraints Poison
Burns
Automobile-restraints, pedestrain Falls Burns
Automobile-restraints,
pedestrian
Falls-play equipment Burns
Questionnaire 1
Safety sheet 0-6 mo
Safety sheet 0-6 mo
Safety sheet 7-12 mo
Ipecac syrup Poison center sticker
Safety sheet 1-2 yr
Safety sheet 1-2 yr
Questionnaire 2
Safety sheet 1-2 yr
Questionnaire 3
Safety sheet 2-4 yr
Safety sheet 2-4 yr
at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 7, 2020
www.aappublications.org/news
placed on the concept that a child will often be able to perform some motor function tomorrow that is
impossible today. In many cases, accidents can be
prevented, but parents must anticipate normal
de-velopmental progression and take appropriate pre-ventive action.
Each safety sheet deals, from different
develop-mental levels, focusing on the six major causes of
childhood mortality. The sheets emphasize how the
child’s improving motor abilities, from rolling over
to riding a tricycle, mean that parents must be alert
to the changing potential for injury that can take
place in the home. Objects that can be a positive
factor in the environment at one developmental
level, can become a significant hazard with the
development of basic locomotive abilities.
Through actual office experience, there has
evolved a series of practical points that facilitate
incorporation of TIPP into an office practice (Table 2).
COUNSELING SCHEDULE
The third part of the TIPP program is the
sug-gested counseling schedule (Table 3). Starting at
the prenatal visit, the physician can help parents
prepare for the baby’s arrival by advising purchase
of an approved child safety seat and installation of
smoke detectors as well as discussing crib safety.
During subsequent visits, various topics are
dis-cussed so that they are brought to the fore before
their developmental need. Thus, a discussion of
falls is scheduled before the baby rolls over, choking
is discussed before the baby can grasp and place
things in its mouth, and a forward-facing
automo-bile safety seat is discussed before the infant mode
is outgrown.
Like all parts of the program, the use of the
schedule will require modification to suit the needs
of each individual practice and practitioner. The
parts of the program that are used and/or
empha-sized will depend on the particular interests and
concerns of the physician involved.
PLANS FOR ThE FUTURE
In reviewing the factors that would increase the
usefulness of TIPP, the AAP Committee on
Acci-dent and Poison Prevention has determined several
areas to be developed. They include construction of
a teaching package that can be used as an
introduc-tion to accident prevention in medical student and
house staff teaching-, production of a videotape that
could teach effective usage of TIPP and could be
shown at national, state, and local meetings; and
translation of the TIPP materials into Spanish.
These additions to the program will facilitate the
introduction of TIPP to the three basic levels of
medicine: students, house staff, and practitioners.
Observers of the national medical scene have
noted that the next great increase in life expectancy
will result not from major medical breakthroughs,
but rather from changes in life-style. Because
pre-ventable injuries are the major factor in number of
productive years and lives lost, it is appropriate
that pediatricians focus their attention on
institut-ing these changes in life-style at a critical time of
1984;74;976
Pediatrics
Leonard Krassner
TIPP Usage
Services
Updated Information &
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/74/5/976
including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Permissions & Licensing
http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml
entirety can be found online at:
Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its
Reprints
http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml
Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 7, 2020
www.aappublications.org/news