• No results found

Appendix A 2014 Financial Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Appendix A 2014 Financial Report"

Copied!
123
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

INTRODUCTION

Our Financial Review is provided to assist readers in understanding the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of Pfizer Inc. (the Company). It should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The discussion in this Financial Review contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, such as those discussed in Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the “Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results”, “Our Operating Environment” and “Our Strategy” sections of this Financial Review.

The Financial Review is organized as follows:

This section provides information about the following: our business; our 2014 performance; our operating environment; our strategy; our business development initiatives, such as acquisitions, dispositions, licensing and collaborations; and our financial guidance for 2015.

This section discusses those accounting policies and estimates that we consider important in

understanding our consolidated financial statements. For additional discussion of our accounting policies, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant

Accounting Policies.

This section consists of the following sub-sections:

This sub-section provides an analysis of our revenues and products for the three years ended December 31, 2014, including an overview of our important biopharmaceutical product developments.

This sub-section provides a discussion about our costs and expenses.

This sub-section provides a discussion of items impacting our tax provisions.

This sub-section provides an analysis of the financial statement impact of our discontinued operations.

This sub-section provides a discussion of an alternative view of performance used by management.

This section provides a discussion of the performance of each of our operating segments. . . .

This section provides a discussion of changes in certain components of other comprehensive income.

This section provides a discussion of changes in certain balance sheet accounts.

This section provides an analysis of our consolidated cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2014.

This section provides an analysis of selected measures of our liquidity and of our capital resources as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, as well as a discussion of our outstanding debt and other commitments that existed as of December 31, 2014. Included in the discussion of outstanding debt is a discussion of the amount of financial capacity available to help fund Pfizer’s future activities.

This section discusses accounting standards that we have recently adopted, as well as those that recently have been issued, but not yet adopted.

This section provides a description of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements presented in this Financial Review relating to, among other things, our anticipated operating and financial performance, business plans and prospects, in-line products and product candidates, strategic reviews, capital allocation, plans relating to share repurchases and dividends and business development plans. Such forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations about future events, which are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Also included in this section are discussions of Financial Risk Management and Legal Proceedings and Contingencies, including tax matters.

Certain amounts in our Financial Review may not add due to rounding. All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts.

Overview of Our Performance, Operating Environment, Strategy and Outlook . . . Beginning on page 2

Significant Accounting Policies and Application of Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions . . . Beginning on page 12

Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income . . . Beginning on page 16 Revenues and Product Developments . . . Beginning on page 20

Costs and Expenses . . . Beginning on page 26 Provision for Taxes on Income . . . Beginning on page 28 Discontinued Operations . . . Beginning on page 29 Adjusted Income . . . Beginning on page 29 Analysis of Operating Segment Information . . . Beginning on page 36 Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income . . . Beginning on page 41 Analysis of the Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . Beginning on page 42 Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . Beginning on page 43

Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources . . . Beginning on page 45

New Accounting Standards . . . Beginning on page 49

(3)

OVERVIEW OF OUR PERFORMANCE, OPERATING ENVIRONMENT, STRATEGY AND OUTLOOK

Our Business

We apply science and our global resources to bring therapies to people that extend and significantly improve their lives through the discovery, development and manufacture of healthcare products. Our global portfolio includes medicines and vaccines, as well as many of the world’s best-known consumer healthcare products. We work across developed and emerging markets to advance wellness, prevention, treatments and cures that challenge the most feared diseases of our time. We collaborate with healthcare providers, governments and local communities to support and expand access to reliable, affordable healthcare around the world. Our revenues are derived from the sale of our products and, to a much lesser extent, from alliance agreements, under which we co-promote products discovered by other companies (Alliance revenues). The majority of our revenues come from the manufacture and sale of biopharmaceutical products. The biopharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and highly regulated. As a result, we face a number of industry-specific factors and challenges which can significantly impact our results. These factors include, among others: the loss or expiration of intellectual property rights and the expiration of co-promotion and licensing rights, healthcare legislation, pipeline productivity, the regulatory environment and pricing and access pressures, and competition among branded products. We also face challenges as a result of the global economic environment. For additional information about these factors and challenges, see the “Our Operating Environment” section of this Financial Review.

The financial information included in our consolidated financial statements for our subsidiaries operating outside the United States (U.S.) is as of and for the year ended November 30 for each year presented.

References to developed markets in this Financial Review include the U.S., Western Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia, Scandinavia, South Korea, Finland and New Zealand; and references to Emerging Markets in this Financial Review include the rest of the world, including, among other countries, China, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, India and Turkey.

On February 5, 2015, we announced that we have entered into a definitive merger agreement under which we agreed to acquire Hospira, Inc. (Hospira), the world’s leading provider of injectable drugs and infusion technologies and a global leader in biosimilars, for $90 per share in cash, for a total enterprise value of approximately $17 billion. We expect to finance the transaction through a combination of existing cash and new debt, with approximately two-thirds of the value financed from cash and one-third from debt. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals in several jurisdictions and the approval of Hospira's shareholders, and is expected to close in the second half of 2015.

On June 24, 2013, we completed the full disposition of our Animal Health business, Zoetis Inc.(Zoetis), and recognized a gain of approximately $10.3 billion, net of tax, in Gain on disposal of discontinued operations––net of tax in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2013. The operating results of this business through June 24, 2013, the date of disposal, are reported as Income from discontinued operations––net of tax in our consolidated statements of income.

On November 30, 2012, we completed the sale of our Nutrition business to Nestlé and recognized a gain of approximately $4.8 billion, net of tax, in Gain on disposal of discontinued operations––net of tax in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2012. The operating results of this business through November 30, 2012, the date of disposal, are reported as Income from discontinued operations––net of tax in our consolidated statements of income.

For additional information about our divestitures, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2D. Acquisitions, Licensing

Agreements, Collaborative Arrangements, Divestitures, and Equity-Method Investments: Divestitures and see the “Our Business Development Initiatives”, “Discontinued Operations” and “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” sections of this Financial Review.

Our 2014 Performance

Revenues––2014

Revenues in 2014 were $49.6 billion, a decrease of 4% compared to 2013, which reflects an operational decrease of $1.1 billion, or 2%, and the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange of $912 million, or 2%. See the "Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––

Revenues––Overview" section below for more information, including a discussion of key drivers of our revenue performance. Income from Continuing Operations––2014

Income from continuing operations in 2014 was $9.1 billion, compared to $11.4 billion in 2013, primarily reflecting, among other items, in addition to the lower revenues described above:

• higher research and development expenses (up $1.7 billion) (see also the “Costs and Expenses––Research and Development (R&D) Expenses” section of this Financial Review);

• the non-recurrence in 2014 of the patent litigation settlement income of $1.3 billion in 2013 (see also the “Costs and Expenses––Other (Income)/Deductions–Net” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 4. Other (Income)/ Deductions––Net);

• higher legal charges (up $958 million) (see the “Costs and Expenses––Other (Income)/Deductions––Net” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions––Net); and

(4)

• the non-recurrence in 2014 of the gain associated with the transfer of certain product rights to our joint venture with Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (Hisun) in China in 2013 ($459 million) (see also the “Our Business Development Initiatives” and “Costs and Expenses––Other (Income)/Deductions––Net” sections of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2E. Acquisitions, Licensing Agreements, Collaborative Arrangements, Divestitures, and Equity-Method Investments: Equity-Method Investments, and Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions––Net),

partially offset by:

• a lower effective tax rate (down 1.9 percentage points to 25.5%) (see also the “Provision for Taxes on Income” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 5. Tax Matters);

• lower restructuring charges and certain acquisition-related costs (down $932 million) (see also the “Costs and Expenses––Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives);

• higher royalty-related income (up $479 million) (see also the “Costs and Expenses––Other (Income)/Deductions––Net” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions––Net);

• lower asset impairments (down $409 million) (see also the “Costs and Expenses––Other (Income)/Deductions––Net” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions––Net);

• an estimated loss recorded in 2013 associated with an option to acquire the remaining interest in Laboratório Teuto Brasileiro S.A. (Teuto) of approximately $223 million and income recorded in 2014 of approximately $55 million, reflecting a decline in the estimated loss from the aforementioned option (see also the “Costs and Expenses––Other (Income)/Deductions––Net” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 4. Other (Income)/Deductions––Net); and

• lower selling, informational and administrative expenses (see the “Costs and Expenses––Selling, Informational and Administrative (SI&A) Expenses" section of this Financial Review) .

See also the “Discontinued Operations” section of this MD&A.

Our Operating Environment

Industry-Specific Challenges

Intellectual Property Rights and Collaboration/Licensing Rights

The loss or expiration of intellectual property rights and the expiration of co-promotion and licensing rights can have a significant adverse effect on our revenues. Many of our products have multiple patents that expire at varying dates, thereby strengthening our overall patent protection. However, once patent protection has expired or has been lost prior to the expiration date as a result of a legal challenge, we lose exclusivity on these products, and generic pharmaceutical manufacturers generally produce similar products and sell them for a lower price. The date at which generic competition commences may be different from the date that the patent or regulatory exclusivity expires. However, when generic competition does commence, the resulting price competition can substantially decrease our revenues for the impacted products, often in a very short period of time.

Our biotechnology products, including BeneFIX, ReFacto, Xyntha and Enbrel (we market Enbrel outside the U.S. and Canada), may face competition in the future from biosimilars (also referred to as follow-on biologics). If competitors are able to obtain marketing approval for biosimilars that reference our biotechnology products, our products may become subject to competition from these biosimilars, with attendant competitive pressure, and price reductions could follow. Expiration or successful challenge of applicable patent rights could trigger this competition, assuming any relevant exclusivity period has expired. However, biosimilar manufacturing is complex, and biosimilars are not generic versions of the reference products. Therefore, at least initially upon approval of a biosimilar competitor, biosimilar competition with respect to biologics may not be as significant as generic competition with respect to small molecule drugs.

We have lost exclusivity for a number of our products in certain markets and have lost collaboration rights with respect to a number of our alliance products in certain markets, and we expect certain products and alliance products to face significantly increased generic competition over the next few years.

(5)

Specifically:

Recent Losses and Expected Losses of Product Exclusivity

The following table provides information about certain of our products recently experiencing, or expected to experience in 2015, patent expirations or loss of regulatory exclusivity, showing, by product, the key dates or expected key dates, the markets impacted and the revenues associated with those products in those markets:

(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Product Revenues in Markets Impacted

Products Key Dates(a) Markets Impacted Year Ended December 31,

2014 2013 2012

Xalatan and Xalacom January 2012 Major European markets $ 127 $ 161 $ 275

Aricept February 2012 Major European markets 28 47 139

Geodon March 2012 U.S. 24 84 214

Revatio tablet September 2012 U.S. 51 67 312

Detrol IR and Detrol LA(b) September 2012

January 2014 Major European marketsU.S. 87 428 605

Lyrica February 2013 Canada 32 101 206

Viagra June 2013 (Europe)

May 2014 (Japan/Australia) Major European marketsJapan and Australia 146 354 472

Rapamune January 2014 U.S. 202 201 185

Inspra(c) March 2014 Major European markets 160 150 131

Lyrica(d) July 2014 Major European markets 1,634 1,458 1,319

Celebrex(e) November 2014 (Europe)

December 2014 (U.S.) Major European marketsU.S. 1,872 2,084 1,906

Zyvox(f) First half of 2015 U.S. 680 688 665

Enbrel August 2015 (Europe)

September 2015 (Japan) Major European marketsJapan 2,832 2,776 2,727

(a) Unless stated otherwise, "Key Dates" indicate patent-based expiration dates.

(b) In January 2014, generic versions of Detrol LA became available in the U.S. pursuant to a settlement agreement.

(c) In March 2014, regulatory exclusivity for Inspra expired in most major European markets, allowing generic companies to submit applications for marketing authorizations for their generic products.

(d) In July 2014, regulatory exclusivity for Lyrica expired in the EU, allowing generic companies to submit applications for marketing authorizations for their generic products.

(e) In December 2014, generic versions of Celebrex became available pursuant to settlement agreements licensing the reissue patent to several of the generic manufacturers involved in the ongoing litigation with respect to Celebrex.

(f) Pursuant to terms of a settlement agreement, certain formulations of Zyvox became subject to generic competition in the U.S. in January 2015. We expect certain other formulations of Zyvox will become subject to generic competition in the U.S. in the first half of 2015.

Recent and Expected Losses of Collaboration Rights

The following table provides information about certain of our alliance revenue products that have experienced or that are expected to experience losses of collaboration rights, showing, by product, the date of the loss of the collaboration rights, the markets impacted and the alliance revenues associated with those products in those markets:

(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Alliance Revenues in Markets Impacted

Products Collaboration RightsDate of Loss of Markets Impacted Year Ended December 31,

2014 2013 2012

Spiriva(a) April 2014 (U.S.), between

2012 and 2016 (Japan, certain European countries, Australia, Canada and South Korea)

U.S., Japan, certain European countries, Australia, Canada and South Korea

$ 168 $ 659 $ 1,143

Aricept(b) December 2012 (Japan),

July 2013 (U.S.) Japan and U.S. 47

Enbrel(c) October 2013 U.S. and Canada 3 1,400 1,500

Rebif(d) End of 2015 U.S. 415 401 399

(a)

Spiriva—Our collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim for Spiriva expires on a country-by-country basis between 2012 and 2016. On April 29, 2014, our alliance in the U.S. came to an end.

(b)

Aricept—Our rights to Aricept in Japan returned to Eisai Co., Ltd. in December 2012. Date shown for U.S. is the date the Aricept 23mg tablet lost exclusivity in the U.S., which was July 2013. 2012 alliance revenues for Aricept have not been approved for disclosure by Eisai Co., Ltd. and therefore are not reflected in the table above.

(c)Enbrel—The U.S. and Canada co-promotion term of our collaboration agreement with Amgen Inc. for Enbrel expired on October 31, 2013. While we are entitled

to royalties for 36 months thereafter, those royalties have been and are expected to continue to be significantly less than our share of Enbrel profits from U.S. and Canada sales prior to the expiration. In addition, while our share of the profits from this co-promotion agreement previously was included in Revenues, our royalties after October 31, 2013 are and will be included in Other (income)/deductions––net, in our consolidated statements of income. Outside the U.S. and Canada, we continue to have the exclusive rights to market Enbrel.

(6)

In addition, we expect to lose exclusivity for various other products in various markets over the next few years. For additional information, see the “Patents and Other Intellectual Property Rights” section in Part I, Item 1, “Business”, of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our financial results in 2014 and our 2015 financial guidance, respectively, reflect the impact and projected impact of the loss of exclusivity of various products and the expiration of certain alliance product contract rights discussed above. For additional information about our 2015 financial guidance, see the “Our Financial Guidance for 2015” section of this Financial Review.

We will continue to aggressively defend our patent rights whenever we deem appropriate. For more detailed information about our significant products, see the discussion in the “Revenues––Major Biopharmaceutical Products” and “Revenues––Selected Product Descriptions” sections of this Financial Review. For a discussion of certain recent developments with respect to patent litigation, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 17A1. Commitments and Contingencies: Legal Proceedings––Patent Litigation.

Regulatory Environment/Pricing and Access––U.S. Healthcare Legislation

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (together, the U.S. Healthcare Legislation, and also known as the Affordable Care Act or ACA), was enacted in the U.S. For additional information, see the “Government Regulation and Price Constraints” section in Part I, Item 1, "Business", of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Impacts on our 2014 Results

We recorded the following amounts in 2014 as a result of the U.S. Healthcare Legislation:

• $631 million recorded as a reduction to Revenues, related to the higher, extended and expanded rebate provisions and the Medicare “coverage gap” discount provision; and

• $362 million recorded in Selling, informational and administrative expenses, related to the fee payable to the federal government. 2014 includes a $215 million charge to account for an additional year of the non-tax deductible Branded Prescription Drug Fee in accordance with final regulations issued in the third quarter of 2014 by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The charge in 2014 also reflected a favorable true-up associated with the final 2013 invoice received from the federal government, which reflected a lower share than that of the initial 2013 invoice.

The final regulations did not change the payment schedule for the Branded Prescription Drug Fee; accordingly there was no cash flow impact in 2014 from the $215 million charge.

Impacts on our 2013 Results

We recorded the following amounts in 2013 as a result of the U.S. Healthcare Legislation:

• $458 million recorded as a reduction to Revenues, related to the higher, extended and expanded rebate provisions and the Medicare “coverage gap” discount provision; and

• $280 million recorded in Selling, informational and administrative expenses, related to the fee payable to the federal government. Impacts on our 2012 Results

We recorded the following amounts in 2012 as a result of the U.S. Healthcare Legislation:

• $593 million recorded as a reduction to Revenues, related to the higher, extended and expanded rebate provisions and the Medicare “coverage gap” discount provision; and

• $336 million recorded in Selling, informational and administrative expenses, related to the fee payable to the federal government. Other Impacts

• Expansion of Healthcare Coverage— The ACA included a coverage expansion that took effect in 2014. For additional information on the coverage expansion under the ACA and its impact on Pfizer's revenues, see the “Government Regulation and Price Constraints—In the United States—Healthcare Reform” section in Part I, Item 1 "Business", of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

• Biotechnology Products—The U.S. Healthcare Legislation also created a framework for the approval of biosimilars (also known as follow-on biologics) following the expiratifollow-on of 12 years of exclusivity for the innovator biologic, with a potential six-mfollow-onth pediatric extensifollow-on. For additional information on the biosimilar approval pathway, the FDA's guidance documents and competition from biosimilar manufacturers, see the "Patents and Intellectual Property—Biotechnology Products“ and "Government Regulation and Price Constraints—In the United States—Biosimilars” sections in Part I, Item 1 "Business", of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(7)

Regulatory Environment/Pricing and Access––Government and Other Payer Group Pressures

Governments, managed care organizations and other payer groups continue to seek increasing discounts on our products through a variety of means, such as leveraging their purchasing power, implementing price controls, and demanding price cuts (directly or by rebate actions). We are exposed to negative pricing pressures in various markets around the world. The U.S. has highly competitive insurance markets. Europe, Japan, China, Canada, South Korea and some other international markets have governments that provide healthcare at low direct cost to consumers and regulate pharmaceutical prices or patient reimbursement levels to control costs for the government-sponsored healthcare system, and have government-mandated reductions in prices and access restrictions for certain biopharmaceutical products to control costs in those markets, particularly under recent global economic pressures. Also, health insurers and benefit plans continue to limit access to certain of our medicines by imposing formulary restrictions in favor of the increased use of generics. In prior years, Presidential advisory groups tasked with reducing healthcare spending have recommended legislative changes that would allow the U.S. government to directly negotiate prices with pharmaceutical manufacturers on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries, which we expect would restrict access to and reimbursement for our products.

Specifically, in the U.S., the following government activities have potential impacts on our financial results:

• Sustainable Growth Rate Replacement—The Medicare physician payment formula known as the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) is routinely overridden by Congressional action because it would lead to dramatic decreases in physician payment. The current legislative relief expires in March 2015. Congress issued a bi-partisan proposal to repeal the SGR and replace it with a new payment model. This form of SGR replacement is estimated by the Congressional Budget Office to cost the federal government approximately $144 billion over 10 years. The source of those funds has yet to be determined, but could include additional taxes on and/or rebate requirements applicable to the pharmaceutical industry, including Pfizer.

• Deficit Reduction—Any significant spending reductions affecting Medicare, Medicaid or other publicly funded or subsidized health programs that may be implemented, and/or any significant additional taxes or fees that may be imposed on us, as part of any broad deficit-reduction effort could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

The ACA, which expanded the role of the U.S. government as a healthcare payer, is accelerating changes in the U.S. healthcare marketplace, and the potential for additional pricing and access pressures continues to be significant. Many of these developments may impact drug utilization, in particular branded drug utilization. Some employers, seeking to avoid the tax on high-cost health insurance in the ACA to be imposed in 2018, are already scaling back healthcare benefits. Some health plans and pharmacy benefit managers are seeking greater pricing predictability from pharmaceutical manufacturers in contractual negotiations. Other health plans and pharmacy benefit managers are

increasing their focus on spending on specialty medicines by implementing co-insurance in place of a flat co-payment. Because co-insurance passes on a percentage of a drug’s cost to the patient, this shift has the potential to significantly increase patient out-of-pocket costs. Overall, there is increasing pressure on U.S. providers to deliver healthcare at a lower cost and to ensure that those expenditures deliver demonstrated value in terms of health outcomes. Longer term, we are seeing a shift in focus away from fee-for-service payments towards outcomes-based payments and risk-sharing arrangements that reward providers for cost reductions. These new payment models can, at times, lead to lower prices for, and restricted access to, new medicines. At the same time, these models can also expand utilization by encouraging physicians to screen, diagnose and focus on outcomes.

In response to the evolving U.S. and global healthcare spending landscape, we are continuing to work with health authorities, health technology assessment and quality measurement bodies and major U.S. payers throughout the product-development process to better understand how these entities value our compounds and products. Further, we are seeking to develop stronger internal capabilities focused on demonstrating the value of the medicines that we discover or develop, register and manufacture, by recognizing patterns of usage of our medicines and competitor medicines along with patterns of healthcare costs.

Regulatory Environment––Pipeline Productivity

The discovery and development of safe, effective new products, as well as the development of additional uses for existing products, are necessary for the continued strength of our businesses. We have encountered increasing regulatory scrutiny of drug safety and efficacy, even as we continue to gather safety and other data on our products, before and after the products have been launched. Our product lines must be replenished over time in order to offset revenue losses when products lose their exclusivity, as well as to provide for earnings growth. We devote considerable resources to R&D activities. These activities involve a high degree of risk and may take many years, and with respect to any specific R&D project, there can be no assurance that the development of any particular product candidate or new indication for an in-line product will achieve desired clinical endpoints and safety profile, will be approved by regulators or will be successful commercially. We continue to strengthen our global R&D organization and pursue strategies intended to improve innovation and overall productivity in R&D to achieve a sustainable pipeline that will deliver value in the near term and over time.

During the development of a product, we conduct clinical trials to provide data on the drug’s safety and efficacy to support the evaluation of its overall benefit-risk profile for a particular patient population. In addition, after a product has been approved and launched, we continue to monitor its safety as long as it is available to patients, and post-marketing trials may be conducted, including trials requested by regulators and trials that we do voluntarily to gain additional medical knowledge. For the entire life of the product, we collect safety data and report potential problems to the FDA and other regulatory authorities. The FDA and regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions may evaluate potential safety concerns related to a product or a class of products and take regulatory actions in response, such as updating a product’s labeling, restricting the use of a product, communicating new safety information to the public, or, in rare cases, removing a product from the market.

(8)

Competition Among Branded Products

Many of our prescription pharmaceutical products face competition in the form of branded or generic drugs that treat similar diseases or indications. For additional information, see the “Competition" section in Part I, Item 1, “Business”, of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Global Economic Environment

In addition to industry-specific factors discussed above, we, like other businesses, are exposed to the economic cycle, which impacts our biopharmaceutical operations globally.

• We believe that patients, who are experiencing increases in co-pays and restrictions on access to medicines as payers seek to control costs, sometimes switch to generic products, delay treatments, skip doses or use less effective treatments. We are exposed to negative pricing pressure in various markets around the world. The U.S. has highly competitive insurance markets, and Europe, Japan, China, Canada, South Korea and a number of other international markets have government-mandated reductions in prices and access restrictions for certain biopharmaceutical products to control costs for the government-sponsored healthcare system, particularly under recent global pressures. Furthermore, some government agencies and third-party payers use health technology assessments in ways that, at times, lead to restricted access to and lower prices for new medicines.

• We continue to monitor developments regarding government and government agency receivables in several European markets where economic conditions remain challenging and uncertain. For further information about our Accounts Receivable, see the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this Financial Review.

• Significant portions of our revenues and earnings, as well as our substantial international net assets, are exposed to changes in foreign exchange rates. We seek to manage our foreign exchange risk in part through operational means, including managing same-currency revenues in relation to same-currency costs and same-currency assets in relation to same-currency liabilities. Depending on market conditions, foreign exchange risk also is managed through the use of derivative financial instruments and foreign currency debt. As we operate in multiple foreign currencies, including the euro, the Japanese yen, the Chinese renminbi, the U.K. pound, the Canadian dollar and approximately 100 other currencies, changes in those currencies relative to the U.S. dollar will impact our revenues and expenses. If the U.S. dollar were to weaken against another currency, assuming all other variables remained constant, our revenues would increase, having a positive impact on earnings, and our overall expenses would increase, having a negative impact on earnings. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar were to strengthen against another currency, assuming all other variables remained constant, our revenues would decrease, having a negative impact on earnings, and our overall expenses would decrease, having a positive impact on earnings. Therefore, significant changes in foreign exchange rates can impact our results and our financial guidance.

The impact of possible currency devaluations in countries experiencing high inflation rates or significant exchange fluctuations, including Venezuela, can impact our results and financial guidance. For further information about our exposure to foreign currency risk, see the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this Financial Review.

Despite the challenging financial markets, Pfizer maintains a strong financial position. Due to our significant operating cash flows, financial assets, access to capital markets and available lines of credit and revolving credit agreements, we continue to believe that we have, and will maintain, the ability to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. Our long-term debt is rated high quality by both Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and Moody’s Investors Service. As market conditions change, we continue to monitor our liquidity position. We have taken and will continue to take a conservative approach to our financial investments. Both short-term and long-term investments consist primarily of high-quality, highly liquid, well-diversified, available-for-sale debt securities. For further discussion about our financial condition, see the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this Financial Review.

These and other industry-wide factors that may affect our businesses should be considered along with information presented in the “Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results” section of this Financial Review and in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Strategy

We believe that our medicines provide significant value for both healthcare providers and patients, not only from the improved treatment of diseases but also from a reduction in other healthcare costs, such as emergency room or hospitalization costs, as well as improvements in health, wellness and productivity. We continue to actively engage in dialogues about the value of our products and how we can best work with patients, physicians and payers to prevent and treat disease and improve outcomes. We continue to work within the current legal and pricing structures, as well as continue to review our pricing arrangements and contracting methods with payers, to maximize access to patients and minimize any adverse impact on our revenues. We remain firmly committed to fulfilling our company's purpose of innovating to bring therapies to patients that significantly improve their lives. By doing so, we expect to create value for the patients we serve and for our shareholders. Commercial Operations

At the beginning of our fiscal year 2014, we began managing our commercial operations through a new global commercial structure consisting of two distinct businesses: an Innovative Products business and an Established Products business. The Innovative Products business is composed of two operating segments, each of which is led by a single manager––the Global Innovative Pharmaceutical segment (GIP) and the Global Vaccines, Oncology and Consumer Healthcare segment (VOC). The Established Products business consists of the Global Established Pharmaceutical segment (GEP), which is led by a single manager. Each operating segment has responsibility for its commercial activities and for certain in-process research and development (IPR&D) projects for new investigational products and additional indications for in-line products that generally have achieved proof of concept. Each business has a geographic footprint across developed and emerging markets.

(9)

Some additional information about each product grouping follows:

• Global Innovative Pharmaceutical segment––GIP is focused on developing, registering and commercializing novel, value-creating medicines that significantly improve patients’ lives. These therapeutic areas include inflammation, cardiovascular/metabolic, neuroscience and pain, rare diseases and women’s/men’s health and include leading brands, such as Xeljanz, Eliquis and Lyrica (U.S. and Japan). GIP has a pipeline of medicines in inflammation, cardiovascular/metabolic disease, neuroscience and pain, and rare diseases.

• Global Vaccines, Oncology and Consumer Healthcare segment––VOC focuses on the development and commercialization of vaccines and products for oncology and consumer healthcare. Consumer Healthcare manufactures and markets several well known, over-the-counter (OTC) products. Each of the three businesses in VOC operates as a separate, global business with distinct specialization in terms of the science and market approach necessary to deliver value to consumers and patients.

• Global Established Pharmaceutical segment––GEP includes the brands that have lost market exclusivity and, generally, the mature, patent-protected products that are expected to lose exclusivity through 2015 in most major markets and, to a much smaller extent, generic pharmaceuticals. Additionally, GEP includes our sterile injectable products and biosimilar development portfolio.

We expect that the GIP and VOC biopharmaceutical portfolios of innovative, largely patent-protected, in-line products will be sustained by ongoing investments to develop promising assets and targeted business development in areas of focus to ensure a pipeline of highly-differentiated product candidates in areas of unmet medical need. The assets managed by these groups are science-driven, highly differentiated and generally require a high-level of engagement with healthcare providers and consumers.

GEP is expected to generate strong consistent cash flow by providing patients around the world with access to effective, lower-cost, high-value treatments. GEP leverages our biologic development, regulatory and manufacturing expertise to seek to advance its biosimilar development portfolio. GEP may also engage in targeted business development to further enable its commercial strategies.

Prior-period information has been restated to conform to the current management structure. For additional information about our operating structure, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 18. Segment, Geographic and Other Revenue Information: Segment Information.

For additional information about the 2014 performance of each of our operating segments, see the “Analysis of Operating Segment Information” section of this Financial Review.

Research Operations

We continue to strengthen our global R&D organization and pursue strategies intended to improve innovation and overall productivity in R&D to achieve a sustainable pipeline that will deliver value in the near term and over time. Our R&D priorities include delivering a pipeline of differentiated therapies with the greatest scientific and commercial promise, innovating new capabilities that can position Pfizer for long-term leadership and creating new models for biomedical collaboration that will expedite the pace of innovation and productivity. To that end, our research primarily focuses on six high-priority areas that have a mix of small molecules and large molecules––immunology and inflammation; cardiovascular and metabolic diseases; oncology; vaccines; neuroscience and pain; and rare diseases. Another area of focus is biosimilars. While a significant portion of R&D is done internally, we continue to seek to expand our pipeline by entering into agreements with other companies to develop, license or acquire promising compounds, technologies or capabilities. Collaboration, alliance and license agreements and acquisitions allow us to capitalize on these compounds to expand our pipeline of potential future products. In addition, collaborations and alliances allow us to share risk and to access external scientific and technological expertise.

For additional information about R&D by operating segment, see the “Analysis of Operating Segment Information” section of this Financial Review. For additional information about our pending new drug applications and supplemental filings, see the “Analysis of the Consolidated Statements of Income––Product Developments” section of this Financial Review. For additional information about recent transactions and strategic investments that we believe have the potential to advance our pipeline and maximize the value of our in-line products, see the “Our Business Development Initiatives” section of this Financial Review.

Business Development

We continue to build on our broad portfolio of businesses and to expand our R&D pipeline through various business development

transactions. For additional information about recent transactions and strategic investments that we believe have the potential to advance our pipeline, enhance our product portfolio and maximize the value of our in-line products, see the “Our Business Development Initiatives” section of this Financial Review.

Intellectual Property Rights

We continue to aggressively defend our patent rights against increasingly aggressive infringement whenever appropriate, and we will continue to support efforts that strengthen worldwide recognition of patent rights while taking necessary steps to ensure appropriate patient access. In addition, we will continue to employ innovative approaches designed to prevent counterfeit pharmaceuticals from entering the supply chain and to achieve greater control over the distribution of our products, and we will continue to participate in the generics market for our products, whenever appropriate, once they lose exclusivity. For additional information about our current efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 17A1. Commitments and Contingencies: Legal Proceedings––Patent Litigation.

(10)

Capital Allocation and Expense Management

We seek to maintain a strong balance sheet and robust liquidity so that we continue to have the financial resources necessary to take advantage of prudent commercial, research and business development opportunities and to directly enhance shareholder value through dividends and share repurchases. For additional information about our financial condition, liquidity, capital resources, share repurchases and dividends, see the “Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this Financial Review.

We remain focused on achieving an appropriate cost structure for the Company. For additional information about our cost-reduction and productivity initiatives, see the “Costs and Expenses––Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.

On October 23, 2014, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a new $11 billion share-purchase plan. Also, on

December 15, 2014, our Board of Directors declared a first-quarter 2015 dividend of $0.28 per share, an increase from the $0.26 per-share quarterly dividend paid during 2014.

On February 9, 2015, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement with Goldman, Sachs & Co. to repurchase $5 billion of our common stock. This agreement was entered into pursuant to our previously announced share repurchase authorization. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 19. Subsequent Events.

Our Business Development Initiatives

We are committed to capitalizing on growth opportunities by advancing our own pipeline and maximizing the value of our in-line products, as well as through various forms of business development, which can include alliances, licenses, joint ventures, dispositions and acquisitions. We view our business development activity as an enabler of our strategies, and we seek to generate earnings growth and enhance shareholder value by pursuing a disciplined, strategic and financial approach to evaluating business development opportunities. We are especially interested in opportunities in our high-priority therapeutic areas—immunology and inflammation; cardiovascular and metabolic diseases; oncology; vaccines; neuroscience and pain; and rare diseases––and in emerging markets and established products, including biosimilars. We assess our businesses and assets as part of our regular, ongoing portfolio review process and also continue to consider business

development activities for our businesses. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 2. Acquisitions, Licensing Agreements, Collaborative Arrangements, Divestitures, and Equity-Method Investments.

The more significant recent transactions and events are described below.

• Agreement to Acquire Hospira, Inc. (Hospira)––On February 5, 2015, we announced that we have entered into a definitive merger agreement under which we agreed to acquire Hospira, the world’s leading provider of injectable drugs and infusion technologies and a global leader in biosimilars, for $90 per share in cash, for a total enterprise value of approximately $17 billion. We expect to finance the transaction through a combination of existing cash and new debt, with approximately two-thirds of the value financed from cash and one-third from debt. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals in several jurisdictions and the approval of Hospira's shareholders, and is expected to close in the second half of 2015.

• Collaboration with OPKO Health, Inc. (OPKO)––On December 13, 2014, we entered into a collaborative agreement with OPKO to develop and commercialize OPKO’s long-acting human growth hormone (hGH-CTP) for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults and children, as well as for the treatment of growth failure in children born small for gestational age (SGA) who fail to show catch-up growth by two years of age. hGH-CTP has the potential to reduce the required dosing frequency of human growth hormone to a single weekly injection from the current standard of one injection per day. The transaction closed on January 28, 2015, upon termination of the Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period. In February 2015, we made an upfront payment of $295 million to OPKO and OPKO is eligible to receive up to an additional $275 million upon the achievement of certain regulatory milestones. We have received the exclusive license to commercialize hGH-CTP worldwide. In addition, OPKO is eligible to receive initial tiered royalty payments associated with the

commercialization of hGH-CTP for Adult GHD, which is subject to regulatory approval. Upon the launch of hGH-CTP for Pediatric GHD, which is subject to regulatory approval, the royalties will transition to tiered gross profit sharing for both hGH-CTP and our product, Genotropin. OPKO will lead the clinical activities and will be responsible for funding the development programs for the key indications, which includes Adult and Pediatric GHD and Pediatric SGA. We will be responsible for all development costs for additional indications as well as all post-marketing studies. In addition, we will fund the commercialization activities for all indications and lead the manufacturing activities covered by the global development plan.

• Acquisition of Marketed Vaccines Business of Baxter International Inc. (Baxter)––On December 1, 2014 (which falls in the first fiscal quarter of 2015 for our international operations), we completed the acquisition of Baxter's portfolio of marketed vaccines for $635 million. The portfolio that was acquired consists of NeisVac-C and FSME-IMMUN/TicoVac. NeisVac-C is a vaccine that helps protect against meningitis caused by group C meningococcal meningitis and FSME-IMMUN/TicoVac is a vaccine that helps protect against tick-borne encephalitis. We also acquired a portion of Baxter’s facility in Orth, Austria, where these vaccines are manufactured.

• Collaboration with Merck KGaA––On November 17, 2014, we entered into a collaborative agreement with Merck KGaA, to jointly develop and commercialize avelumab, an investigational anti-PD-L1 antibody currently in development as a potential treatment for multiple types of cancer. We and Merck KGaA will explore the therapeutic potential of this novel anti-PD-L1 antibody as a single agent as well as in various combinations with our and Merck KGaA’s broad portfolio of approved and investigational oncology therapies. Both companies will collaborate on up to 20 high priority immuno-oncology clinical development programs expected to commence in 2015. These clinical development programs include up to six trials (Phase 2 or 3) that could be pivotal for potential product registrations. We and Merck KGaA will also combine resources and expertise to advance Pfizer’s anti-PD-1 antibody into Phase 1 trials. Under the terms of the agreement, we made an upfront payment of $850 million to Merck KGaA and Merck KGaA is eligible to receive regulatory and commercial milestone payments of up to approximately $2.0 billion. Both companies will jointly fund all development and commercialization costs, and split

(11)

equally any profits generated from selling any anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 products from this collaboration. Also, as part of the agreement, we gave Merck KGaA certain co-promotion rights for Xalkori in the U.S. and several other key markets. In 2014, we recorded $1.2 billion of Research and development expenses associated with this collaborative arrangement, composed of the $850 million upfront cash payment as well as an additional amount of $309 million, reflecting the estimated fair value of the co-promotion rights given to Merck KGaA. • Acquisition of InnoPharma, Inc. (InnoPharma)––On September 24, 2014, we completed our acquisition of InnoPharma, a privately-held

pharmaceutical development company, for an upfront cash payment of $225 million and contingent consideration of up to $135 million. • License from Cellectis SA (Cellectis)––On June 18, 2014, we entered into a global arrangement with Cellectis to develop Chimeric Antigen

Receptor T-cell immunotherapies in the field of oncology directed at select cellular surface antigen targets. In August 2014, we made an upfront payment of $80 million to Cellectis, which was recorded in Research and development expenses. We will also fund research and development costs associated with 15 Pfizer-selected targets and, for the benefit of Cellectis, a portion of the research and development costs associated with four Cellectis-selected targets within the arrangement. Cellectis is eligible to receive development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments of up to $185 million per product that results from the Pfizer-selected targets. Cellectis is also eligible to receive tiered royalties on net sales of any products that are commercialized by Pfizer.

• Investment in ViiV Healthcare Limited (ViiV)––On January 21, 2014, the European Commission approved Tivicay (dolutegravir), a product for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, developed by ViiV, an equity-method investee. This approval, in accordance with the agreement between GlaxoSmithKline plc and Pfizer, triggered a reduction in our equity interest in ViiV from 12.6% to 11.7% and an increase in GlaxoSmithKline plc’s equity interest in ViiV from 77.4% to 78.3%, effective April 1, 2014. As a result, in 2014, we recognized a loss of approximately $30 million in Other (income)/deductions––net. We continue to account for our investment in ViiV under the equity method due to the significant influence that we continue to have through our board representation and minority veto rights.

• Collaboration with Eli Lilly & Company (Lilly)––In October 2013, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Lilly to jointly develop and globally commercialize Pfizer's tanezumab, which provides that Pfizer and Lilly will equally share product-development expenses as well as potential revenues and certain product-related costs. The tanezumab program currently is subject to a partial clinical hold by the FDA pending review of additional nonclinical data. Under the agreement with Lilly, we are eligible to receive certain payments from Lilly upon the achievement of specified clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones, including an upfront payment of $200 million that is contingent upon the parties continuing in the collaboration after receipt of the FDA’s response to the submission of the nonclinical data. Both Pfizer and Lilly have the right to terminate the agreement under certain conditions.

• Divestiture of Zoetis––On June 24, 2013, we completed the full disposition of Zoetis. The full disposition was completed through a series of steps, including, in the first quarter of 2013, the formation of Zoetis and an initial public offering (IPO) of an approximate 19.8% interest in Zoetis and, in the second quarter of 2013, an exchange offer for the remaining 80.2% interest.

• Collaboration with Merck & Co., Inc. (Merck)––On April 29, 2013, we announced that we entered into a worldwide (except Japan) collaboration agreement with Merck for the development and commercialization of Pfizer's ertugliflozin (PF-04971729), an investigational oral sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitor currently in Phase 3 development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

• Investment in Hisun Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Company Limited (Hisun Pfizer)––On September 6, 2012, we and Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (Hisun), a leading pharmaceutical company in China, formed a new company, Hisun Pfizer, to develop, manufacture, market and sell pharmaceutical products, primarily branded generic products, predominately in China. In the first quarter of 2013, we and Hisun contributed certain assets to Hisun Pfizer. Hisun Pfizer is 49% owned by Pfizer and 51% owned by Hisun. Our contributions constituted a business, as defined by U.S. GAAP, and in 2013, we recognized a pre-tax gain of approximately $459 million in Other (income)/deductions––net.

• License of Nexium OTC Rights––In August 2012, we entered into an agreement with AstraZeneca PLC (AstraZeneca) for the exclusive, global, over-the-counter (OTC) rights for Nexium, a leading prescription drug approved to treat the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In connection with this Consumer Healthcare licensing agreement, we made an upfront payment of $250 million to AstraZeneca, which was recorded in Research and development expenses in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2012. On May 27, 2014, we launched Nexium 24HR in the U.S., and on July 11, 2014, we paid AstraZeneca a related $200 million product launch milestone payment; and on August 1, 2014, we launched Nexium Control in Europe, and on September 15, 2014, we paid AstraZeneca a related $50 million product launch milestone payment. These post-approval milestone payments were recorded in Identifiable intangible assets, less accumulated amortization in the consolidated balance sheet and will be amortized over the estimated useful life of the Nexium brand. AstraZeneca is eligible to receive additional milestone payments of up to $300 million, based on product launches outside the U.S. and level of worldwide sales as well as royalty payments, based on worldwide sales.

• Divestiture of Nutrition Business––On November 30, 2012, we completed the sale of our Nutrition business to Nestlé for $11.85 billion in cash.

• Acquisition of NextWave Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (NextWave)––On November 27, 2012, we completed our acquisition of NextWave, a privately-held, specialty pharmaceutical company. As a result of the acquisition, we hold exclusive North American rights to Quillivant XR™ (methylphenidate hydrochloride), the first once-daily liquid medication approved in the U.S. for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

• Acquisition of Alacer Corp. (Alacer)––On February 26, 2012, we completed our acquisition of Alacer, a company that manufactured, marketed and distributed Emergen-C, a line of effervescent, powdered drink mix vitamin supplements.

(12)

Our Financial Guidance for 2015

The following table provides our financial guidance for full year 2015(a), (b):

Reported revenues $44.5 to $46.5 billion

Adjusted cost of sales as a percentage of reported revenues 18.5% to 19.5% Adjusted selling, informational and administrative expenses $12.8 to $13.8 billion

Adjusted research and development expenses $6.9 to $7.4 billion

Adjusted other (income)/deductions Approximately ($500 million) of income

Effective tax rate on adjusted income Approximately 25.0%

Reported diluted Earnings per Share (EPS) $1.37 to $1.52

Adjusted diluted EPS $2.00 to $2.10

The following table provides a reconciliation of 2015 Adjusted income and Adjusted diluted EPS guidance to the 2015 Reported net income attributable to Pfizer Inc. and Reported diluted EPS attributable to Pfizer Inc. common shareholders guidance:

Full-Year 2015 Guidance(a), (b)

(BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) Net Income Diluted EPS

Adjusted income/diluted EPS guidance $12.4 - $13.0 $2.00 - $2.10

Purchase accounting impacts of transactions completed as of December 31, 2014 (2.5) (0.41)

Restructuring and implementation costs (0.8) - (1.1) (0.13) - (0.18)

Business and legal entity alignment costs (0.3) (0.04)

Reported net income attributable to Pfizer Inc./diluted EPS guidance $8.5 - $9.4 $1.37 - $1.52

(a) The 2015 financial guidance reflects the following:

• Our guidance for reported revenues reflects the anticipated negative impact of $3.5 billion due to recent and expected product losses of exclusivity as well as $2.8 billion as a result of recent adverse changes in essentially all foreign exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar compared to foreign exchange rates from 2014, partially offset by anticipated revenue growth from certain other products.

• Guidance for adjusted R&D expensesreflects the $295 million upfront payment made to OPKO in February 2015. See “Our Business Development Initiatives” above.

• Our reported and adjusted diluted EPS guidance reflects: (i) a $0.17 unfavorable impact as a result of adverse changes in foreign exchange rates from 2014; (ii) a $0.03 reduction for the upfront payment associated with the transaction with OPKO; (iii) planned share repurchases totaling approximately $6 billion in 2015, including $1 billion of our shares repurchased through February 27, 2015 and our $5 billion accelerated share repurchase program announced on February 9, 2015; and (iv) assumed diluted weighted-average shares outstanding of approximately 6.2 billion shares, which is inclusive of these share repurchase transactions.

• Does not assume the completion of any business-development transactions not completed as of December 31, 2014, including any one-time upfront payments associated with such transactions, except for the $295 million upfront payment made to OPKO in February 2015. Our 2015 financial guidance does not reflect any impact from our proposed acquisition of Hospira. We expect that transaction to close during the second half of 2015.

• Excludes the potential effects of the resolution of litigation-related matters.

• Exchange rates assumed are as of mid-January 2015. Excludes the impact of a potential devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar or any other currency. • Guidance for the effective tax rate on adjusted income does not assume renewal of the U.S. research and development (R&D) tax credit. The renewal of the

U.S. R&D tax credit is not anticipated to have a material impact on the effective tax rate on adjusted income.

(b) For an understanding of Adjusted income and its components and Adjusted diluted EPS (all of which are non-GAAP financial measures), see the “Adjusted

Income” section of this Financial Review.

For additional information about our actual and anticipated costs and cost savings associated with our cost-reduction initiatives and our new global commercial structure, see the “Costs and Expenses––Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives” section of this Financial Review and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 3. Restructuring Charges and Other Costs Associated with Acquisitions and Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives.

Our 2015 financial guidance is subject to a number of factors and uncertainties—as described in the “Our Operating Environment”, “Our Strategy” and “Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results” sections of this Financial Review and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(13)

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING

ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS

For a description of our significant accounting policies, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies. Of these policies, the following are considered critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements as they require the application of the most subjective and the most complex judgments: (i) Acquisitions (Note 1D); (ii) Fair Value (Note 1E); (iii) Revenues (Note 1G); (iv) Asset Impairments (Note 1K); (v) Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans (Note 1P); and (vi) Contingencies, including Tax Contingencies (Note 1O) and Legal and Environmental Contingencies (Note 1Q).

Following is a discussion about the critical accounting estimates and assumptions impacting our consolidated financial statements. See also Estimates and Assumptions (Note 1C) for a discussion about the risks associated with estimates and assumptions.

Acquisitions and Fair Value

For a discussion about the application of Fair Value to our recent acquisitions, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 2A. Acquisitions, Licensing Agreements, Collaborative Arrangements, Divestitures, and Equity-Method Investments: Acquisitions.

For a discussion about the application of Fair Value to our investments, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7A. Financial Instruments: Selected Financial Assets and Liabilities.

For a discussion about the application of Fair Value to our benefit plan assets, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 11D. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans and Defined Contribution Plans: Plan Assets.

For a discussion about the application of Fair Value to our asset impairment reviews, see “Asset Impairment Reviews” below.

Revenues

Our gross product revenues are subject to a variety of deductions, that are generally estimated and recorded in the same period that the revenues are recognized, and primarily represent rebates, chargebacks and sales allowances to government agencies, wholesalers/ distributors and managed care organizations with respect to our pharmaceutical products.

Those deductions represent estimates of rebates and discounts related to gross sales for the reporting period and, as such, knowledge and judgment of market conditions and practice are required when estimating the impact of these revenue deductions on gross sales for a reporting period. Historically, our adjustments of estimates, to reflect actual results or updated expectations, have not been material to our overall business. On a quarterly basis, our adjustments of estimates to reflect actual results generally have been less than 1% of

biopharmaceutical revenues, and have resulted in either a net increase or a net decrease in revenues. Product-specific rebates, however, can have a significant impact on year-over-year individual product growth trends. If any of our ratios, factors, assessments, experiences or judgments are not indicative or accurate predictors of our future experience, our results could be materially affected. The sensitivity of our estimates can vary by program, type of customer and geographic location. However, estimates associated with U.S. Medicare, Medicaid and performance-based contract rebates are most at risk for material adjustment because of the extensive time delay between the recording of the accrual and its ultimate settlement, an interval that can generally range up to one year. Because of this time lag, in any given quarter, our adjustments to actual can incorporate revisions of several prior quarters.

Asset Impairment Reviews

We review all of our long-lived assets for impairment indicators throughout the year. We perform impairment testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill at least annually and for all other long-lived assets whenever impairment indicators are present. When necessary, we record charges for impairments of long-lived assets for the amount by which the fair value is less than the carrying value of these assets. Our impairment review processes are described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements––Note 1K. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Amortization of Intangible Assets, Depreciation and Certain Long-Lived Assets. Examples of events or circumstances that may be indicative of impairment include:

• A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of the asset. For example, a successful challenge of our patent rights would likely result in generic competition earlier than expected.

• A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used. For example, restrictions imposed by the FDA or other regulatory authorities could affect our ability to manufacture or sell a product.

• A projection or forecast that indicates losses or reduced profits associated with an asset. This could result, for example, from a change in a government reimbursement program that results in an inability to sustain projected product revenues and profitability. This also could result from the introduction of a competitor’s product that results in a significant loss of market share or the inability to achieve the previously projected revenue growth, as well as the lack of acceptance of a product by patients, physicians and payers. For in-process research and development (IPR&D) projects, this could result from, among other things, a change in outlook based on clinical trial data, a delay in the projected launch date or additional expenditures to commercialize the product.

References

Related documents

We speculate that the Late Jurassic was a time of transition from (1) a mid-Paleozoic – Middle Jurassic interval of mainly but not exclusively strike-slip and episodic docking

Baker, Ruth, "Government Efforts and Personal Opinion Explain the Medicalization of Pregnancy and Childbirth Through Time in Lower Mustang, Nepal" (2014). Independent

2 This article investigates the cyclical properties of the three main components of working capital— inventories (raw materials, work- in-process, and …nished goods), cash

The objective of this step is to formalize our knowledge about the processes involved in the current system using graphical representation, i.e., Data Flow Diagrams

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first rigorous attempt to quantify the risk of APOs with access to improved sanitation and practice using a population-based cohort,

My evaluation was based solely upon studies of a Bone Clones® replica. My opinions are based solely upon the material presented

Figure 1 - Concordances between genotypes selected, based on Kappa coefficient, via direct selection for each environment (E1 to E10) and indirect selection via , harmonic mean

(2013). Reprinted from Bulletin of Volcanology, Magma discharge variations during the 2011 eruptions of Shinmoe-dake volcano, Japan, revealed by geodetic and satellite observations,