• No results found

Safety Management in Nuclear Technology

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Safety Management in Nuclear Technology"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Safety Management

in Nuclear Technology

Symposium

October 16 – 17, 2014,

Munich, Germany

TÜV SÜD Akademie GmbH TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH

(2)

About the Symposium

Safety management has been a explicit subject in the field of nuclear technology since 2002. TÜV SÜD’s symposiums on “Safety management in nuclear technology” have from the outset offered a forum for institutions and people who participate in operating safe, secure nuclear power plants to discuss their experiences with safety management.

The legal background conditions have changed, so new challenges for safety management systems during

post-operational and dismantling phases have been added to the usual efforts to make continuous improvements to safety management systems in plants that are operational. Both aspects will be considered during the Symposium.

The objective of the Symposium is to

support the continuous improvement process for safety management systems while plants are operational

increase familiarity with current trends and new approaches and tools

reflect international experience with using safety manage-ment systems

pinpoint and discuss new challenges, approaches, and tools for using safety management systems during the post- operational phase and decommissioning and dismantling work

The Symposium is intended

for specialists and managers at

Nuclear power plants and operating companies

Other nuclear facilities

Nuclear permitting and regulatory bodies

Expert organizations

Technical and academic institutions

who are involved in developing, introducing, using, evaluating, or assessing safety management systems in nuclear technology. The Symposium is also aimed at professionals from industry, government agencies, and other institutions with similar responsibilities.

Conference languages

German and English (simultaneous translation)

€ 750,– plus current VAT (if applicable)

The registration fee includes conference documentation, lunch and drinks during breaks as well as the evening event.

Conference venue

TÜV SÜD · Auditorium Chiemsee

Westendstraße 199 · 80686 Munich, Germany You will receive travel and hotel information with the confirmation of your registration.

(3)

Agenda on October 16, 2014

9:45 a.m. Welcoming address

Dr. Reinhard Kohl, TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH, Munich, Germany

Introduction

Hans-Joachim Rauh, TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH, Munich, Germany

robust organizations

10:00 a.m. Keynote address: Safety management from a resilience engineering perspective: Introducing Safety-II in daily operations*

Erik Hollnagel, Ph.D. Professor, University of Southern Denmark, Chief Consultant, Region of Southern Denmark

11:00 a.m. Coffee break

11:30 a.m. Promoting organizational resilience – Lessons learned from emergency response exercises

Josephine Rehr, Mandy Richter, Bert Matzig, Tom-Oliver Solisch, ESN Sicherheit und Zertifizierung GmbH, Schwentinental, Germany

new developments in national/international rules and regulations

12:10 p.m. From management system for facilities and activities to leadership and management for safety*

Pierre Gest, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria

12:50 a.m. Lunch

13:50 p.m. Development of international standards for quality / Documentation in the area of nuclear technology by ISO

Dr. Gerhard Roos, office of the KTA-GS (Nuclear Safety Standards Commission) at the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Salzgitter, Germany

implementation and supervision of safety manage-ment in plants

2:30 p.m. Management system – Efficient tool for maintaining safety and profitability when operating nuclear power plants

Dr. Erwin Fischer, Dr. Willibald Kohlpaintner, Jürgen Schwarzin, E.ON Kernkraft GmbH, Hannover, Germany

3:10 p.m. Coffee break

3:40 p.m. The Finnish approach on safety management and the safety management system for nuclear power*

Ann-Mari Sunabacka-Starck, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), Helsinki, Finland

4:20 p.m. Ongoing assessment of the safety management system and further development of the set of independent indicators

Dr. Babette Fahlbruch, TÜV NORD Systems GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin; Dr. Hubertus von Raczeck, Ministry of the Energy Transformation, Agriculture, the Environment, and Rural Areas of the German state of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany

5:30 p.m. End of first conference day 7:00 p.m. Evening event

(4)

Agenda on October 17, 2014

Using safety management during post-operation, decommissioning, and demolition phases

8:30 a.m. Safety management for decommissioning and demolition – Experience, changes, and challenges

Stephan Seitz, TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH, Munich; Dr. Ulrich G. Schnabel, Fraunhofer IAO, Stuttgart, Germany

9:10 a.m. Clear responsibilities and structures for dismantling nuclear power plants: Challenges of EU co financed demolition of nuclear power plants in eastern Europe] Veronika Ustohalova, Gerhard Schmidt, Öko-Institut e.V., Darmstadt, Germany

9:50 a.m. Coffee break

10:05 a.m. Maintaining motivation and safety awareness in a shut down power plant: Motivation workshops for production employees in nuclear power plants]

Rainer Miller, MTO Safety GmbH, Berlin; Oliver Wendt, Kernkraftwerk Krümmel GmbH & Co. oHG, Geesthacht, Germany

Tools to improve safety culture and human actions

10:45 a.m. Assessing safety of nuclear organisations with a DISC safety culture framework*

Pia Oedewald, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

11:25 a.m. Veal sausage & pretzels

12:25 p.m. Improving safety culture – VGB-SBS method for assessing and improving safety culture / professional action

Olaf Blumenau, Kernkraftwerk Gundremmingen GmbH; Frank Heinrich, E.ON Kernkraft GmbH, Hannover, Germany

1:05 p.m. Do you make mistakes? Professional action can protect against mistakes: Fundamentals and practical implementation in plants and dismantling based on the example of ongoing training at the Isar Nuclear Power Plants

Peter Kreuzer, E.ON Kernkraft GmbH, Isar Nuclear Power Plants, Essenbach, Germany; Kai Dexheimer, DEXCON Consulting GmbH, Neuhausen am Rhein-fall, Switzerland

1:45 p.m. Improving the use of human performance tools based on practical training methods

Bert Poeten, Ulrich Drosten, GfS Gesellschaft für Simulatorschulung mbH, Essen

2:25 p.m. Outlook and closing remarks

(5)

201701-SiManaKern-GB-fl8-105x210-w-14-07-11 | Photografic material: KSG/GfS und E.ON Kernkraft

registration and information

TÜV SÜD Akademie GmbH International Conferences Sabine Lieckfeldt Westendstraße 160 80339 Munich, Germany Phone +49 89 5791-1122 Fax +49 89 5155-2468 [email protected]

All information about our conferences and conventions – quickly and easily with your smartphone.

www.tuev-sued.de/tagungen [email protected]

References

Related documents

The Impact of Strategic HRM Practices on Employee’s Job Satisfaction: The Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership. International Journal of Social,

Weiss, Scaling Analysis of Deformation field within Granular Materials: Application to Strain Localization, AGU Fall Meeting , 5-9 December 2011...

In forward flight, the effects of trim condition, advance ratio, lift offset, and separated wake on the hub loads, inflow distribution and aeroelastic stability are examined..

It seems that both ways are executed in a domestic fish industry, because on the one hand a considerable production and staff potential is distributed in coastal voivodeships,

It is reasonably clear that the intellect in Aristotle's psychology and intentionality in Brentano share similar relationships to their respective subjects and similar roles in their

At the same time, he used elements that derived from the reflections discussed so far: from Aristotle, for example, the argument that a causal chain could never be infinite, as well

In those instances where RSA may provide advisory services for client assets maintained within a client’s 401(k) or similar employer sponsored plan and/or insurance products,

premium...” (MIA-T Ex. 18.) It was also determinedthat, “{s]ince State Farm did not include this mid-term additional premium charge effective March 24, 2009 in its October 10,