• No results found

Standardization of Clinical Processes with LEAN for 4 Eye Surgeons: Finding Unity in the Eye of the Storm

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Standardization of Clinical Processes with LEAN for 4 Eye Surgeons: Finding Unity in the Eye of the Storm"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Standardization of Clinical Processes

with LEAN for 4 Eye Surgeons:

Finding Unity in the Eye of the Storm

Julia R. Spankowski and Gregory J. Stacey

Lean Six Sigma Black Belts / Froedtert Health

(2)

Froedtert Health

Academic medical

hospital partnered with

the Medical College of

Wisconsin

3 Hospitals

Over 20 clinics and

surgery centers

Nationally ranked

Southeastern Wisconsin

is the primary coverage

area

(3)

Approach:

A3 Problem Solving

Define the

Problem

1

Understand

Current

State

2

Complete

Target

Setting

3

Root Cause

Analysis

4

Determine

Solution

Approach

5

Rapid

Experiments

6

Develop a

Completion

Plan

7

Confirm

Results

8

Reflect on

Insights

9

(4)

Problem Definition

In the past year there were 4

errors that either resulted in a

wrong lens implant and/or

patient safety issues in the

cataract process from errors

that were discovered by staff

or patient follow-up.

(5)

Cataract video

(6)

Current State

Temporary Containment

New process for documenting

lens changes

OR schedule documentation

Implementation of a 2

nd

timeout

for lens changes in the operating

room

(7)

Current State

Key Observation

4 providers + 4 processes = Greater opportunity

for patient safety errors

(8)

Target State

No patient safety errors

Single standardized process with specific

criteria for exception processes

(9)

Team Development Stages

22-23 Oct 2015 2015 Joint Technical Communities Conference 9

• Team acquaints • Ground rules

established • Members are like

strangers

Forming

• Clarity of purpose • Members feel like

individuals • Conflicts start

Storming

• Feel like a team • Goals can be met

through compromise • Clear roles

Norming

• Clear vision and purpose

• Members are open and trusting • Flexibility is key Performing • Task completion • Good feelings • Recognition of team Adjourning

(10)

Change Management Scenario

Background

4 Providers each believing their process is the best

Team is in storming phase

Unclear on who is making them change

First time solving problem as a team

Providers have their own practice no direct authority

Question

What approach would you have taken to move the team past

the “Storming Phase”?

(11)

Change Management Scenario

Our Approach

Clearly defined sponsor and champion

Sign off on Charter

(Formal Leadership commitment not received on the A3)

»

Head of Cataract Surgery, Chair of Dept., VP of Quality

Sponsor Report-outs

»

Sharing expectations and check-in

Remained neutral and let them get out concerns

Facilitators- Did not give directives, wanted team to realize

they needed to work together to fix process

(12)

Root Cause Analysis

Staff available to

do A’s and K’s

during patient

visit otherwise

map alternative

Should there be

same day lens

selection?

Multiple Handoffs

1

2

3

4

6

(13)

Determine Solution Approach

(14)
(15)

22-23 Oct 2015 2015 Joint Technical Communities Conference 15

(16)
(17)

22-23 Oct 2015 2015 Joint Technical Communities Conference 17

Conduct a 30-60-90

Day Review

M etric

C urrent

State

F uture State

30 day

4/ 10/ 15

60 day

5/ 08/ 15

90 day

6/ 10/ 15

Wrong Lens Implants

3 in recent year

0 per year

0

0

0

Tech availability for IOLs

Not measured

95%

100%

100%

99%

Reduction in Wasted IOLS in OR

2.25 per month

1 per month

0

0

2

Near Misses in OR

0 per year

0

0

0

(18)

Change Management Scenario

Background

In the Confirmed Results process checks, it was observed

one provider specifically was not consistently following the

new standard process.

This provider is an amazing and high volume surgeon.

Question

How would you handle this at the 30, 60, 90 day checkpoints

to make sure this does not continue?

(19)

Change Management Scenario

Our Approach

– Our Approach

• 30 day give process more time

• 60 day sent out friendly email reminder pointing out specific

offenses

• 90 day one on one, working to set up Cataract Team

meeting/huddle frequency

(20)

Key Insights

What went well?

 Staff is now working better as a cohesive team

 Structured PDCA methodology

What helped?

 Using an outside resource (LSS Black Belts) to challenge the team

What didn’t go well?

 Difficulty moving past preconceived notions

Lessons Learned

 Allowing the team time to storm was critical in

Reflect on

(21)

Thank you!

References

Related documents

The TWA 8h means of road tanker drivers’ (Studies IVb and V), depot workers’ and deck men’s (Study VI) exposure to gasoline components in work without a vapor recovery system..

During this visit, the expert group interviewed a large number of relevant people, including children and parents who experienced the practices first hand, but

compute the Wald estimate by dividing the estimated effect of treatment by 0.68 (i.e. multiplying by 1.47); as we show, the results of the reduced form and first stage are

First, based on the teachers the average error and standard d preferred output and the syste type-1 fuzzy logic systems (on we present only a sample of th show that the type-2

A researcher from the Harm Reduction study mentioned that the board was somewhat small for the participants of this study, because of their age and time injecting: "Small to

Second, adopting a model developed by Donegan and Stampe (1983; 2004), in which rhythmic alignment is viewed as the primary linguistic engine of typological drift, I

This research is may, perhaps, one of the initial attempts to consider the role of halalan tayyiban principle as one of the vital ways to comply with how food cart business

These policy and technology recommendations can help public agencies reduce the frequency of pavement utility cuts, and thereby reduce the rate at which the local and