• No results found

Opening a negotiation: language

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Opening a negotiation: language"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Opening a negotiation: language

Greetings

Introductions, if necessary

Small talk, in most cases

Getting comfortable, if necessary (drinks, sitting down…)

Transition to negotiation (setting agenda)

 Establishing positions

(establishing good lines of communication)

(2)
(3)

Interactional Style – what is it?

A person’s habitual, often subconscious, patterns of acting and speaking in

interaction with other people

(4)

More indirect style More direct style

Possible miscommunication:

Feels confused, impatient

Feels offended, pushed

Interactional style dimensions

(5)

•Wider culture

•Community norms

•Family norms

•Individual personality

•Education, school and work

•Immediate context/situation

•Mood, health…

Interactional style is influenced by:

(6)

Let’s try another dimension of style…

Find one partner

One person in the pair sit with your back to this screen (so you can’t see it). You will be talking about a recent trip you took (for vacation or work) for 3 minutes.

Other person: While your partner is talking,

MAKE LESS EYE CONTACT than is usual for you. Otherwise, try to act normally.

(7)

Less eye contact More eye contact

Possible miscommunication:

Feels other doesn’t care

Feels other is aggressive

Interactional style dimensions

(8)

Possible miscommunication:

Talks all the time, trying to fill the awkward silences

Rarely talks; ‘can’t get a word in edgewise’

Interactional style dimensions

Fewer, shorter pauses Frequent overlap of talk

More, longer pauses Rare overlap of talk

(9)

Information should be volunteered

Ask questions to get information

Possible miscommunication:

Asks all the questions, Waits for questions,

feels other doesn’t care about him/her

Waits for other to

volunteer information;

feels interrogated

Interactional style dimensions

(10)

Less pitch variation Wide pitch

variation

Possible miscommunication:

Thinks other is boring, disinterested

Thinks other is overly emotional, excitable

Interactional style dimensions

(11)

Less use of gesture, body movement

Frequent use of gesture, body movement

Possible miscommunication:

Feels other is

disinterested, uninspired

Feels other is overly excitable,

unprofessional

Interactional style dimensions

(12)

Softer voice Louder voice

Possible miscommunication:

Feels other is timid, shy, or possibly weak

Feels other is

aggressive, annoying

Interactional style dimensions

(13)

Infrequent

‘backchannels’

Frequent

‘backchannels’

Possible miscommunication:

Feels other is disinterested, or doesn’t understand

Feels other is interrupting, disruptive

Interactional style dimensions

(14)

Speaks only after thinking

Speaks as part of thinking

Possible miscommunication:

Thinks other is too

cautious, conservative, not a quick thinker

Thinks other is too

impulsive, not careful, not trustworthy

Interactional style dimensions

(15)

What can be done?

Some options:

Be aware of possible style differences

Don’t assume you know the others’ styles

Stay observant in the interaction rather than judgmental

Try to identify style differences if they occur.

Try to adjust your style somewhat

Occasionally check in with the others – are they comfortable with the interaction?

Talk explicitly about style differences – name the problem

(16)

Be aware of possible style differences

Before you begin a negotiation (or any interaction with a new person), be aware that that person may have different patterns of negotiating than you do.

These patterns may be consciously employed, or subconsciously employed, or some mix of each.

They may be intended to have a negative effect on you, or they may be intended to have a positive

effect (though the actual effect may not match the intended effect!). Just being aware of the

(17)

Don’t make assumptions about the others’

styles

Before you begin a negotiation, find out as much as you can about the other parties involved, as we

discussed regarding preparation. Making possible predictions about their behavior is helpful, but

don’t make assumptions about them or their

styles based on cultural background, for example.

You may be wrong and caught unawares.

(18)

Stay observant in the interaction rather than judgmental

During the negotiation, remain aware of the process as well as the content of the negotiation. What

patterns of interaction are emerging in the

negotiation? Who is talking, not talking, what is the body language of everyone involved, etc. Ask yourself, how do I feel about what is happening, and what can I do about it that will be productive to this process?

(19)

Try to identify specific style differences if they occur

Once you identify differences, they may not affect you as negatively.

For example, if you find yourself being interrupted often, notice this, and think about it. The person may be intending to disrupt you, or may simply have a style that allows and expects interruption.

Instead of getting angry and/or withdrawing from the interaction, stay calm and focused and make sure you return to your own points after you are interrupted.

(20)

Try to adjust your own style somewhat

For example, if you find yourself being interrupted a lot, another option is to try calmly but firmly

holding the floor when you are interrupted (i.e.

don’t stop talking), instead of instantly

relinquishing the floor. Likewise, if they are talking a lot, you can try politely interrupting them: “Excuse me, may I just say something here…”. Avoid becoming increasingly quiet

(21)

Occasionally check in with the others – are they comfortable with the interaction?

(This is particularly important if you are trying to establish or maintain a longer-term relationship).

If you suspect that your style may be dominating

their style (because they are getting quiet, looking frustrated, etc.), you can explicitly ask them some questions. E.g.,‘Are you feeling comfortable with this decision? How do you feel about these terms?

Have you had enough chance to discuss your concerns?’

(22)

Talk explicitly about what is happening – name the problem

For example, if you find yourself being interrupted a lot, try saying, ‘Excuse me, sorry to interrupt, but I feel like I’m having a hard time getting a word in. Could I take a few minutes to explain my

perspective on this?’ If they are interrupting with no intention of disrupting you, then you have just helped to raise their awareness of what is

happening. If they indeed are interrupting you to disrupt you, you have just politely asserted your

References

Related documents

For Level I requirements #1 and #2 we choose to use the Xerox/NASA Docushare system called NX. This augmented COTS toolset provides state-of-the-art configuration

Year of implementation: 2003 - 2004 Construction cost: 60.000.000 Euro Progress: Design approved.. Tunnel of the route n° E78 so called

“The Efficiency of Competitive Equilibria in Insurance Markets with Asymmetric Information” (with Arthur Snow), Journal of Public Economics, March 1985, pp. “Vertical Integration

The research question that drove the inquiry was; ‘How does meaningful teacher and student involvement as collaborative inquirers into service learning model a pedagogy for

In the figure a block ‘A’ of mass ‘m’ is attached at one end of a light spring and the other end of the spring.. is connected to another block ‘B’ of mass 2m through a

(ii) 3.5% of the new balance shown on your billing statement (excluding any balance in connection with a special promotional purchase with a unique payment calculation); or (iii)

• Declaration of function optional when a function declared with argument that data type only should be used in calling and definition.  Function should return a

The completion of the Ph.D.’s Ten Years Later study, a national study of the career paths of doctoral degree recipients, has allowed us to provide detailed information about the