• No results found

Subject Description Form

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Subject Description Form"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Subject Description Form

Subject Code

APSS5760

Subject Title

Evolution in Family Therapy: Structural & Systemic Approaches

Credit Value

3

Level

5

Pre-requisite /

Co-requisite/

Exclusion

Nil

Assessment Methods

100% Continuous Assessment Individual Assessment Group Assessment 1. Reading & Quiz 20% 0%

2. Case Report / Portfolio 50% 0% 3. Group presentation & Case

Powerpoint Report 0% 30%

Objectives

The main purpose of this course is to facilitate students to develop a system perspective in understanding marriage and family therapy. Students are expected to critically examine the role of the changing epistemological paradigms in the evolution of marriage and family therapy approaches. Students will be introduced to the major concepts of general system theory that shape the development of various family therapy approaches. Students will be guided to compare and contrast the differences in the philosophical, theoretical and practice assumptions underlying the three major family therapy approaches: Bowen family systems therapy, Structural family therapy and Milan systemic approaches. The emphasis of the learning is on developing a systemic orientation to family practice instead of mastering exclusively on therapeutic techniques of these family therapy approaches.

Intended Learning

Outcomes

Upon completion of the subject, students will be able to:

a. Examine the influences of modern and post-modern perspectives in marriage and family therapy.

b. Understand the historical evolution and development of systems theory, including first and second-order cybernetics, and their impact on the emergence of various family therapy approaches.

c. Understand the philosophical premises, theoretical assumptions, practice principles, and ethical principles underlying the three o major family therapy approaches, Structural, Bowen family systems, and Milan systemic family therapy approaches.

d. Examine the research basis for supporting their practice of these three family therapy approaches.

e. Creatively integrate the three family therapy approaches with different family problems and issues in the context of Hong Kong;

f. Begin to develop their own personal style of family therapy in light of the family therapy approaches studied.

(2)

Subject Synopsis/

Indicative Syllabus

1. Overview the difference between individual and family therapy 2. Historical development for family therapy

3. General system theory 4. Family life cycle

5. The application of systemic epistemological paradigm in Bowen family systems therapy

6. The application of systemic epistemological paradigm in Structural family therapy 7. The application of systemic epistemological paradigm in Milan systemic family

therapy

8. Family system assessment and family system interventions

Teaching/Learning

Methodology

The main pedagogical approach for this subject is based on the action learning approach. Through attending the lectures and reading of the relevant materials, students will develop a conceptual understanding on the subject. They will be expected to actively experiment the newly learned concepts with actual cases. Their experimentation will be presented to the whole class so as to get feedback from other fellow students and teacher. Based on the feedback, they will make further experimentation with the newly acquired knowledge for family therapy practice. The subject will also incorporate a variety of experientially-based pedagogical methods to facilitate the students’ learning, including case studies, role-play, videos of real-life cases, and individual and group presentation and reflection.

Assessment Methods

in Alignment with

Intended Learning

Outcomes

Specific assessment methods/tasks % weighting

Intended subject learning outcomes to be assessed (Please tick as appropriate)

a b c d e f 1. Reading & Quiz 20% 

1. Case Portfolio 50%       2. Group presentation

& Case Powerpoint Report

30%

     

Total 100 %

Explanation of the appropriateness of the assessment methods in assessing the intended learning outcomes:

Course requirement:

1. Reading and Quiz (20%) 2. Case Portfolio (50%)

Students are expected to read the assigned readings for the quizzes. Students will submit a case portfolio consisting of three case reports on three different family cases. Each case report will not exceed 10 double-spaced pages. Students are expected to analyze the family from the perspectives of the Structural, Bowen family systems, and Milan systemic family approaches. Each report should include a genogram or a family map of the family, and the analysis of the problems facing the family and treatment direction..

(3)

3. Group presentation & Case Powerpoint Report (30%)

The class will be divided into small groups. Each group will present one family case. Students will have to analyze the family case according to one of the three family therapy approaches. The presentations emphasize on a systemic analysis on the problem and design of appropriate treatment plans to be administrated to the family. Students will submit a brief powerpoint report of the presentation.

Student Study

Effort Expected

Class contact:

 Lecture 27 Hrs.

 Seminar 12 Hrs.

Other student study effort:

 Preparation for case presentation 15 Hrs.  Reading on required books & articles 30 Hrs.

 Assignment 30 Hrs.

Total student study effort 114 Hrs.

Medium of

Instruction

English supplemented with Chinese

Medium of

Assessment

English

Reading List and

References Textbook

Nichols, M. P. (2012). Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods (10th ed.). Boston,

MA: Pearson.

References Essential

Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., Hoffman, L., & Penn, P. (1987). Milan systemic family

therapy: Conversations in theory and practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Hoffman, L. (1981). Foundations of family therapy: A conceptual framework for

systems change. New York, NY: Basis Books.

Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen

theory. New York, NY: Norton.

McGoldrick, M., & Gerson, R. (1985). Genograms in family assessment. New York, NY: Norton.

Minuchin, S. (1974). Families & family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

(4)

Minuchin, S., & Fishman, C. H.. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Family Systems Perspective

Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (2012). Family therapy: A systemic integration. (8th

ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Broderick, C. B. (1993). Understanding family process: Basics of family systems

theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Dallos, R., & Draper, R. (2010). An introduction to family therapy: Systemic theory

and practice. (2nd ed.). Maidenhead; NY: Open University Press.

Gladding, S. T. (2014). Family therapy: History, theory and practice. (6th ed.). Boston

MA: Pearson.

Hanna, S. M. (2007). The practice of family therapy: Key elements across models. Belmont, CA : Thomson

Nichols, M. P. (2010). The Essentials of family therapy. (5th ed.). Boston, MA:

Pearson.

Wynne, L. C., McDaniel, S. H., & Weber, T. T. (Eds.). (1986). Systems consultation:

A new perspective for family therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press Structural Family Therapy

Minuchin, S. (1974). Families & family Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Minuchin, S., & Fishman, C. H. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Minuchin, S., Nichols, M. P., & Lee, W. Y. (2007). A four-step model for assessing families and couples: From symptom to psyche. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Bowen Family Systems Therapy

Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.

Brown, F. H. (Ed.). (1991). Reweaving the family tapestry: A

multigenerational approach to families. New York, NY: Norton & Company.

Framo, J. L. (1992). Family-of-origin therapy: An intergenerational approach. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.

Kramer, J. R. (1985). Family interfaces: Transgenerational Patterns, New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.

Kerr, M. E. & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen

theory. New York, NY: Norton.

(5)

NY: Norton.

Roberto, L. G. (1992). Transgenerational family therapies. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Titelman, P. (ed.). (1998). Clinical applications of Bowen family systems theory. New York, NY: Haworth Press.

屈偉豪 (2007) 。家庭成長歷程,2nd ed. 飛躍國際網絡。 屈偉豪 (1999) 。情牽兩代心 (錄音帶),卓越出版社。

Milan Systemic Family Therapy

Bennun, I. (1986). Evaluating family therapy: A comparison of the Milan and problem solving approaches, Journal of Family Therapy, 8(3), 225 - 242.

Boscolo, L., & Bertrando, P. (1996). Systemic therapy with individuals. London, England: Karnac Books.

Burbatti, G. L., Castoldi, I., & Maggi, L. (1993). Systemic psychotherapy with

families, couples, and individuals. London, England: Jason Aronson.

Campbell, D., Draper, R., Huffington, C. (1991). Second thoughts on the theory and

practice of the milan approach to family therapy. London, England: Karnac Books.

[On line book: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=14477407]

Campbell, D. (1999). Family Therapy and Beyond: Where is the Milan Systemic Approach Today? Child Psychology & Psychiatry Review, 4(2), 76 - 84.

Campbell, D. (2003). The mutiny and the bounty: The place of Milan ideas today.

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 24(1), 15-25.

Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesizing, circularity and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26(4), 405-413.

Haley, J. (1984). Ordeal therapy. Sanfrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Palazzoli, M. S., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1994). Paradox and

counterparadox. London, England: Jason Aronson.

Penn, P. (1982). Circular questioning. Family Process, 21(2), 267-280.

Lawson, D. M., & Prevatt, F. F. (1999). Casebook in family therapy. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Selvinii, M. P., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing – circularity – Neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family

Process, 19(1), 3 -12.

Tomm, K. (1987). Interventive interviewing: Part I. Strategizing as a fourth guideline for the therapist, Family Process, 26(1), 3-13.

Tomm, K. (1987). Interventive interviewing: Part II. Reflexive questioning as a means to enable self-healing, Family Process, 26(2), 167-183.

(6)

Suggested Reading

Carter, B. & McGoldrick, M.. (Ed.). (1989). The changing family life cycle: A

framework for family therapy (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Goldenberg, I. & Goldenberg, H. (2008). Family therapy: An overview. (8th ed.). Brooks/Cole.

Piercy, F. P., Sprenkle, D. H. & Associates. (1986). Family therapy sourcebook. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Brock, G. W., & Barnard, C. P. (2008). Procedures in marriage and family therapy.

References

Related documents

The Anfora series, designed for LZF by Miguel Herranz, comprises a suspension lamp available in three different versions, as well as a table lamp or a floor lamp.. The

Lamp test This function is used on some FACP’s to check the condition of the light emitting diodes (LEDs) on the FACP. Remote Annunciator panel: A remote annunciator panel

The approach of Taguchi method is applied for the optimization of selected process parameters such as the mold temperature, melt temperature, packing pressure, packing

Thereby, if for efficiency-driven countries, G.D.P., inflation rate, trade, labour productivity and costs are important determinants of competitiveness, for innovation-driven

The loci that have higher allele count frequencies for the highest possible allele count of eight remain SE33, D1S1656, and Penta E as seen for the two- and

[r]

Bias analysis is similar to the case of differential amplifier with current-source active load. No reason to put a cascode current

Uraibi on his thesis entitled “ Dynamic Robust Bootstrap Algorithm for Linear Regression Model Selection using Least Trimmed Squares (LTS)” in accordance with Universities