• No results found

2012 Winston & Strawn LLP

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "2012 Winston & Strawn LLP"

Copied!
36
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Top 5 Negotiation Points for

Software, SaaS, and Outsourcing Agreements

Brought to you by Winston & Strawn’s

(3)

Today’s eLunch Presenters

Glynna Christian Intellectual Property New York [email protected] Becky Troutman Intellectual Property San Francisco [email protected] Brian Fergemann

Advertising, Marketing, and Entertainment

Chicago

(4)

Top 5 Negotiation Points

Defining your goals and measurable performance

requirements

Conducting due diligence

Determining the pricing model

Identifying key issues and potential resolutions

Exiting the relationship

(5)

Sourcing Strategy – Adding Value

Any project must have a clearly articulated value

proposition to the business

Value is measured in more than bottom-line results

Enabling the company to work at peak performance while

respecting its culture and values

Leveraging service providers’ capabilities

Maximizing value for both the company and the service

provider

(6)

Defining Your Goals and

Performance Criteria

There should be a business need that can be solved

by sourcing

To understand the scope of that business need, the

company must examine its needs, such as:

Areas within the business that have divergent interests

Technical, implementation, and project management

requirements

Project budget

then

translate those needs into measurable

requirements

(7)

Business Case – Why?

Provide background

Explain the business need and potential solution

Common examples – too many legacy applications, will not sustain future business requirements, proprietary software and process not conforming to industry standards, technology-driven rather than process-driven

Quantify the impact of transformation

Obtain approval to move forward

(8)

Business Case – What is it?

Documentation of current technology or process “as is”

Review and consideration of the desired “to be” state

Gap analysis between “as is” and “to be”

Cost analysis of getting to “to be” and cost of not changing

the process

 Establish a baseline for cost management and future benefit tracking  Estimate the costs, benefits, and other financial metrics of the

potential solution

Establish measurable success criteria (

e.g.

, cost, added value

considerations, or both)

(9)

Specifying the Business Requirements

Detailed requirements and defined deliverables

 Capable of being measured, and  The results analyzed and reported

Any process flows to be changed or implemented?

Data issues

 Any new data to be collected or converted?

 Who will have access to data and how will it be used, stored, and

transmitted?

Implementation planning

 Will the services be phased in? Will a pilot test be conducted?

Integration planning – what is the potential impact on other

(10)

Performance Requirements

Service Level Agreements (SLAs)

 Mechanism for ensuring quality service

 Measures the vendor’s performance of certain requirements  Objective and measurable

 Review SLAs against published standards

 Avoid too many SLAs – prioritize by impact if the SLA is not met  Service Level Credits

 Vendor pays credits for failure to meet performance  Should credits be sole and exclusive remedy?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

 Measurements that indicate success for the project

(11)

Due Diligence – Who is your partner?

Corporate structure

Location – red flag!

Where will services be performed?

Where will data be transferred, processed, or stored?

Key subcontractors

Reputation, lawsuits, investigations

Financial stability

(12)

Due Diligence – What is provided?

Intellectual property

patents

trademarks/brands

copyrights

trade secrets, confidential information, data

Software, database, Software as a Service

Other Services

(13)

Due Diligence – Intellectual Property

Is the IP registered in the relevant jurisdictions?

Does the vendor own or have the right to sublicense

IP and services in all relevant jurisdictions?

Are there any restrictions on the vendor’s ownership

or license rights in any jurisdiction?

(14)

Due Diligence – Other Issues

Policies and procedures for protecting confidential

information

Data security measures, ISO certifications

Disaster recovery plans

Insurance

(15)
(16)

Pricing Models – SaaS

For software or pay-as-you-go services, you should know:

 How you will use the software, system, or services  # of users who must access the software or services  Transaction volumes for each application

 Transaction costs for each application

 Growth rates for revenue, costs, volumes, and users

Consumption-based pricing models

 Per-user

 Per-transaction

 Percentage-of-revenue  Fixed-fee model

(17)

Pricing Models – Outsourcing

Usually a monthly or annual service charge

 Incremental fee based on consumption  Fee based on the number of users

 Fixed price and price caps  Time and materials

 Cost-plus

Alternative models

 Gain-sharing

 Incentive-sharing  Shared risk-reward  Revenue-sharing

(18)

Pricing Models – Outsourcing cont’d

Gain-sharing

 Based on the value delivered by vendor

 Gains are difficult to agree upon and measure  Reluctance to fund without guaranteed payback

Incentive-based

 Earn-back or bonus payments made to the vendor for achieving

performance levels above SLAs

(19)

Pricing Models – Outsourcing cont’d

Shared risk-reward

 Jointly funded development of new products, solutions or services  Vendor shares in rewards for a period of time

 Difficult to measure results or quantify rewards  Issues around ownership, investments

Revenue-sharing

 Vendor shares in your revenues from activities supported by the

(20)

Negotiating the Best Price

Seek competitive bids

 “Best practice” is an RFP process focused on accomplishing the value

proposition outlined in the business case

 Risks in a sub-standard RFP

 Gaps in internal business processes

 Increasing costs and partially met expectations due to:  Disorganized, non-customized RFP process

 Inadequate planning and understanding of solution complexities  Poorly structured contract not based on outcomes

 Poorly defined metrics and success criteria

 Vendor deficiencies in delivering against expectations

Obtain comparative pricing

(21)

Key Issues – Intellectual Property

Scope of license/access rights

 Who needs to have use rights?  What use rights are required?

 What restrictions are imposed, and are third-party materials licensed

under additional terms?

 Does vendor need license to customer IP?

Ownership of developed IP – red flag!

 “Work for hire”  Joint ownership

(22)

Key Issues – Confidentiality

Scope:

 Mutual?

 How is “confidential information” defined?  Is data privacy and security addressed?

What are the restrictions?

 Disclosure, use, reverse engineering  Employees, contractors, representatives

(23)

Key Issues – Confidentiality

What are the exceptions?

 Written authorization

 Made public through no fault of recipient  Provided by third party without restriction  Independently developed

 Compelled disclosure

 Disclosure to potential investors or buyers under a confidentiality

obligation

(24)

Key Issues – Warranties

Ownership

Noninfringement

Performance of software/SaaS

Performance of services

Third-party software

Malware

Open source software

(25)

Key Issues – Indemnity Scope

Allocation of risk

 What can go wrong that results in a third-party claim?  Who should be responsible for the claim?

Scope: Defend, indemnify, and hold harmless

Who is indemnified?

 Officers, directors, employees, contractors, agents  Affiliates, customers

(26)

Key Issues – Indemnity Scope

Requirements

 Prompt notice

 Sole control over defense and settlement

 No acts/omissions that affect defense or settlement  All amounts paid

Selection of counsel

(27)

Key Issues – Indemnity

Infringement

 Exceptions

 Self-help remedies

Bad acts

 Breach of warranty, breach of agreement  Acts, omissions

 Violation of law

 Fraud, gross negligence, willful misconduct

(28)

Key Issues – Indemnity

Sample Vendor-Favorable Indemnity:

X.1 Infringement Claims. If an action is brought against Licensee

claiming that the Software infringes any United States patent, copyright or trade secret rights of a third party, Licensor shall defend Licensee at Licensor’s expense and shall pay the damages and costs finally awarded against Licensee in the action, but only if (a) Licensee notifies Licensor promptly upon learning that the claim might be asserted, (b) Licensor has sole control over the defense of the claim and any negotiation for its settlement or compromise, and (c) Licensee takes no action that, in

Licensor’s judgment, materially impairs Licensor’s defense of the claim. This indemnity 1 will not apply if and to the extent that the infringement claim results from a correction or modification of the Software not

(29)

Key Issues – Liability Cap

Does the cap apply to both parties?

 What is the cap?

 Fees/multiple of fees paid during a certain period  Flat cap

Are there exceptions?

 Indemnity

 Breach of confidentiality/privacy

(30)

Key Issues – Disclaimer of Damages

Does the disclaimer apply to both parties?

What is disclaimed?

 Consequential & incidental damages  Indirect, special, punitive damages  All damages/all liability – red flag!

Are there exceptions?

 Indemnity

 Breach of confidentiality/privacy

(31)

Key Issues – Disclaimer of Damages

Sample Vendor-Favorable Damages Disclaimer:

LIMITED LIABILITY. THE MAXIMUM LIABILITY OF LICENSOR AND ITS

AFFILIATED ENTITIES AND ITS AND THEIR LICENSORS AND SUPPLIERS TO LICENSEE FOR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID TO LICENSOR BY LICENSEE DURING THE THREE (3)

MONTH PERIOD PRIOR TO THE DATE A CLAIM ARISES. UNDER NO

CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL LICENSOR (OR ITS AFFILIATED ENTITIES OR ITS OR THEIR LICENSORS AND SUPPLIERS) BE LIABLE TO LICENSEE OR TO ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, HOWEVER CAUSED, INCLUDING,

WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOSS OF PROFITS AND COSTS OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS.

(32)

Key Issues – Assignment

Can each party assign to a third party?

Is a change of control an assignment?

Common limitations on assignment

 Prior written consent

 Consent not unreasonably withheld

 Exceptions for affiliates, merger, asset sale  Assignee agrees to be bound

(33)

Exiting the Relationship

Termination for convenience

 Customer should have the right after a specified period of time for

vendor to recover sunk costs

 Customer may have to pay early termination charge  Vendor should NOT have right to T for C

Termination for breach

 Generally limit vendor’s right to terminate only for material

non-payment of undisputed amounts

 Consider termination rights for vendor breaches that may cause

significant impact to the customer

Examples: “Safety and soundness” of financial institutions, data breaches

(34)
(35)
(36)

References

Related documents

8.1 Except for the liability regarding infringement of intellectual property rights as set forth in Article 7, the Licensor shall in no event be liable to the Licensee under this

2.5 With respect to the license granted to LICENSEE pursuant to Section 2, LICENSOR grants to LICENSEE the rights to sublicense the Software in Source Code to a Subcontractor,

Customer shall defend, at its sole expense, any third party Claim against DEVELOPER alleging: (1) that Customer’s Content infringes the intellectual property rights, contract

13.3.2 If the party seeking Arbitration is the Licensee, such proposal shall be addressed to the Licensor and the Licensor shall, within fifteen days from the

If the Licensee's use of the Licensed Software is enjoined, the Licensor shall promptly, at its own expense, place the Licensee in a position where it is able to use the System

Licensee shall defend and hold Tobii and its officers, directors, employees and agents harmless from (i) any claim by a third party that an Application infringes

Licensor shall defend with counsel acceptable to USA, indemnify and hold Licensee, its Affiliates, assignees and each of its and their managing directors, partners,

Licensor's sole liability for any breach of this warranty shall be to refund up to one month’s hosting fees (if paid by Licensee). Only if Licensee informs Licensor of