• No results found

Common Ground Alliance Damage Information Reporting Tool

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Common Ground Alliance Damage Information Reporting Tool"

Copied!
40
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

www.cga-dirt.com

Common

 

Ground

 

Alliance

Damage

 

Information

 

Reporting

 

Tool

 

May

 

6,

 

2010

Kentucky

 

PSC/PHMSA

 

Pipeline

 

Safety

 

(2)

Overview

Common

 

Ground

 

Alliance

DIRT:

  

What

 

is

 

it?

 

Why

 

should

 

I

 

submit?

  

How

 

do

 

I

 

submit?

(3)

Common

 

Ground

 

Alliance

1999:

 

Under

 

direction

 

of

 

Congress,

 

U.S.

 

DOT

 

sponsored

 

Common

 

Ground

 

Study

– 160 government and industry representatives

– Consensus process

Final

 

report

 

identified

 

existing

 

best

 

practices

 

and

 

emerging

 

technologies

Formation

 

of

 

CGA

 

in

 

2000

 

driven

 

by

 

need

 

for

 

continuing

 

efforts

 

to

 

improve

 

damage

 

(4)

Common

 

Ground

 

Alliance

 

today

Common

 

Ground

 

Alliance

 

today

• Membership Structure: Volunteer organization

– Individual Members – Almost 1,400

– Member Organizations – 165

– Sponsors – 40

• Organizational Structure:

– Board of Directors

– Working Committees (populated by membership)

• Best Practices Committee

• Data Reporting & Evaluation Committee • Research & Development Committee

• Educational Programs & Marketing Membership Committee • Affiliated One‐Call Systems Education Committee

• Regional CGA Committee – Staff

(5)

Common

 

Ground

 

Alliance

Common

 

Ground

 

Alliance

• Awarded additional funding through cooperative  agreement with the Pipeline & Hazardous Materials  Safety Administration (PHMSA)– Funding contributes  to:

• Educational Campaigns – 811, Agriculture, Locate 

Accurately, children’s educational video

• Data Information & Reporting Tool (DIRT)

• Publication of Best Practices

• Expansion of Regional Partner Program

• CGA has assisted OPS with successfully closing 10  number of outstanding National Transportation  Safety Board recommendations. 

(6)
(7)

*Photos – Dig Safely Oregon Excavation damage:

understanding the problem and addressing the issue - need for data…DIRT

(8)

DIRT

What

 

is

 

it?

DIRT (Damage Information Reporting Tool) is a secure, web

application used for collecting and reporting underground damage information.

• Based on original the Common Ground Study • Appendix C of the current Best Practice

Key consideration in development of tool: Ease of use

Anonymity/confidentiality

Standardization of information collected

(9)
(10)

DIRT

 

Registration

• Accept the Terms & 

Conditions

• Email and Password

• Security Question – Animal – Color – Birth date • Contact info • Identify Company  affiliation – Choose existing  company

– Enter a new company

• Additional Users

(11)
(12)

Getting

 

Started

Company

 

Administrator:

responsible

 

for

 

maintaining

 

the

 

list

 

of

 

individuals

 

in

 

his/her

 

stakeholder

 

company

 

allowed

 

to

 

utilize

 

DIRT.

Manager:

can

 

enter

 

data,

 

edit

 

data,

 

and

 

generate

 

reports

 

for

 

the

 

company.

  

User:

can

 

only

 

enter

 

data

 

into

 

the

 

system.

  

No

 

(13)

Administrator

 

Approval

Approve / Reject

Existing Company: new users approved by Company Admin.

(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)

Data

 

Submission

4 ways to submit data:

1) Individual incidents reported singularly

on the damage report form

2) Bulk data submission via the ADL

(Automated Data Loader)

3) Universal Front End Loader

4.) Virtual Private DIRT

(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)

Part

 

E:

 

Notification

 

&

(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)

ABC’s

 

of

 

data

 

collection

A. Who is submitting data B. Date and Location of 

the event

C. Affected Facility  Information

D. Excavation Information E. Notification

F. Locating and Marking

G. Excavator Downtime H: Description of Damage  I: Description of the Root 

Cause

J.  Additional Comments  (Character Limit: 4000) 

(29)
(30)
(31)

Required

 

Fields

• 16 required fields are:

– Stakeholder Type

– Date

– Country, State, County, City, ROW Type

– Type of Facility Operation and Facility Affected

– Type of Excavator, Excavator Equipment and Work 

Being Performed

– Did the Excavator notify the One‐Call Notification 

Center

– Was there damage to a facility and did the damage 

cause a service interruption

(32)
(33)
(34)

34

(35)

35

(36)

36

(37)

37

%

 

of

 

Facility

 

Events

 

by

 

Known

 

Root

 

Cause

(38)

Data

 ‐

other

Root Cause by Reporting Stakeholder varied with 

stakeholder submitting data

Data submitted by excavators : 66.5%  root cause = locating practices 

not sufficient

Data submitted by facility owners (gas and telcom) :  35 – 40% root 

cause = excavation practices not sufficient or notification not made

Data quality continues to be an issueData  Quality Index

Measures completeness of information submitted

Overall data quality is 57%

(39)

For

 

more

 

information

www.commongroundalliance.com

www.call811.com

www.cga‐dirt.com

http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/

(40)

Thank

 

you

 ‐

Questions?

[email protected]

317

253

1622

References

Related documents

General distribution: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Byelorussia, China, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech

It provides an introduction to mobile user expectations, mobile data networks, mobile devices, and why mobile testing is software testing?. • Chapter 2: Introduction to

We start by giving an introduction to the system and its features, followed by a description of a number of security flaws of Novell NetWare, version 3.12.. It is then discussed to

Sustainability communication in accommodation businesses tends to be factual and descriptive, as companies are concerned with product-based messages that focus on what they do;

It was hypothesized that children and parents who perceived greater treatment burden would also perceive more “unhealthy” functioning within their family, and as a result, the

We define household net worth from the SHIW as the total value of tangible assets (consumer durable goods, jewelry and other valuables, real estate, businesses) and financial

Targeting adolescents in ages 10–14 and 15–19, the programme aims to ensure universal coverage of health information and services for all adolescents — those in and out of school,