• No results found

ICCCFO SPRING 2011CONFERENCE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "ICCCFO SPRING 2011CONFERENCE"

Copied!
30
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ICCCFO

SPRING 2011CONFERENCE

SPRING 2011CONFERENCE

GETTING THE MOST OUT OF YOUR ACADEMIC SPACE

(2)

,

This

 

number

 

represents:

´

A.

   

The

 

Average

g

 

Community

y

 

College

g

 

building

g

 

area

 

´

B. The

 

Average

 

cost

 

of

 

a

 

college

 

degree

 

in

 

2021

´

C

Total students attending Illinois Community Colleges

´

C. Total

 

students

 

attending

 

Illinois

 

Community

 

Colleges

´

D. None

 

of

 

the

 

above.

(3)

,

´

Cost

 

of

 

building,

 

maintaining, heating/cooling

 

a

 

new

 

32 seat classroom without inflation for 30 years

32

 

seat

 

classroom

 

without

 

inflation

 

for

 

30

 

years.

« (864 sf classroom at $250/sf + soft costs + energy + O&M costs)

² Many community colleges have more than 100 teaching spaces.

(4)

AGENDA

´

The $935,193 question

´

The $935,193 question

´

Past /Current

Master Plans

´

Space Utilization

´

Space Utilization

«

Methodology

Li it ti

«

Limitations

«

Calculations

Utili ti S i ² Utilization Summaries

² Seat Utilization Summaries

«

Benchmarks

«

Benchmarks

«

Potential

 

Recommendations

(5)

MASTER PLANS

´

Past Master Plans Located Growth

´

Past Master Plans Located Growth

C

t

M t Pl

d i

b

´

Current

Master Plans are driven by:

«

Sustainable Campuses

«

Student Success

«

Technology Use

«

Technology Use

«

Getting more out of our Facilities

²

Space Utilization

²

Space Utilization

²

Space needs

(6)

SPACE UTILIZATION

´

What is

Space Utilization

?

«

A study of how often teaching spaces are used

«

A study of how often teaching spaces are used.

Utili ti St di

«

Utilization Studies can measure:

²

Hours of use per day or week

f

b h

d

k

²

Percentage of use by hour, day or week

²

Seat utilization or average class size

²

Benchmarking against our peers

(7)

SPACE UTILIZATION – WHY?

²

High cost of New Construction

g

²

Long term Operational Costs

²

Understand seat utilization or average

class size

²

Understand why some spaces are used

more than others

²

Generate changes to the schedule to free up

classrooms

Ob

/D f Ed

l

²

Obama/Dept of Education goal to increase

college graduates by 50% by 2020

(8)

SPACE UTILIZATION – MEASUREMENT

´

Measurement Standards

´

Measurement Standards –

Classrooms

«

65% Utilization

-D

P k T

During Peak Times

h

l

«

40 hours Total

Use per Week - 24/7

ICCCFO SPRING 2011 CONFERENCE

(9)

SPACE UTILIZATION – METHODOLOGY

«

Determine areas to study

«

Determine areas to study

² Classrooms, Instructional Labs, Computer Labs,

Conference/Meeting Roomsg

«

Times

² 8am-1pm, 1pm -5pm, 5pm-10pm

«

Peak Utilization

² Monday – Thursday 8am-1pm & 5pm-10pm

«

Passing time per hour

«

Acquire data during a selected week

² 6+ weeks into the Fall or Spring Semester

² Export data from the College’s Scheduling Software

(10)

SPACE UTILIZATION – LIMITATIONS

²

Accuracy of scheduling software

²

Off-line schedulingg

²

Not perfect, but a snapshot to work from dates

selected

selected

²

Over-Utilization

C dit

dit

²

Credit vs. non-credit

(11)

SPACE UTILIZATION – EXPORTED DATA

(12)

SPACE UTILIZATION – EXPORTED DATA

4hours 5 hour 4hours (5 hours) ( )

ICCCFO SPRING 2011 CONFERENCE

(13)

SPACE UTILIZATION – EXPORTED DATA

´ Exported raw data from R25 Scheduling Software

´ Total hours – morning/afternoon/evening – Mon-Friday

(E l Cl 1001 8 1 M d F id )

(5 hours)

« (Example Classroom 1001 – 8am-1pm - Monday - Friday)

(5 hours)

4.00 (hrs use) /5 (max hrs) = 80% Utilization Mondays 8am-1pm

ICCCFO SPRING 2011 CONFERENCE

(14)

SPACE UTILIZATION - CALCULATIONS

2 00 (h ) / 5

40%

´ 2.00 (hours use) / 5 (max hours) = 40%

40%

60%

40%

40%

40%

0%

50%

50%

40%

40%

80%

0%

80%

0%

37%

(15)

SPACE UTILIZATION – SUMMARY DATA

75.3%

(16)

SPACE UTILIZATION – SUMMARY DATA

58.83%

31 99 hrs ICCCFO SPRING 2011 CONFERENCE

(17)

SPACE UTILIZATION – SUMMARY DATA

(18)

SPACE UTILIZATION – SUMMARY DATA

(19)

SPACE UTILIZATION

– INSTRUCTIONAL LABS

33.71%

17 90 hrs ICCCFO SPRING 2011 CONFERENCE

(20)

SPACE UTILIZATION

– COMPUTER LABS

55.53%

30 67 hrs ICCCFO SPRING 2011 CONFERENCE

(21)

SPACE UTILIZATION

– CONFERENCE ROOMS

(22)

SPACE UTILIZATION

– CONFERENCE ROOMS

(23)

SPACE UTILIZATION

SEAT UTILIZATION DATA

(24)

SPACE UTILIZATION

– SEAT UTILIZATION

Classroom seats filled during scheduled classes – Avg . Class Size 21.48 

Morning  ‐ 73.6%  Afternoon ‐ 67.4%    Evening ‐ 62.5%

Avg. Class Size – Morning 23.8 , Afternoon ‐ 21.2, Evening ‐ 19.5 

ICCCFO SPRING 2011 CONFERENCE

(25)

SPACE UTILIZATION

– SEAT UTILIZATION

(26)

SPACE UTILIZATION

– SEAT UTILIZATION

(27)

SPACE UTILIZATION

- BENCHMARKING

(28)

SPACE UTILIZATION -

POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS

´ Standardize the start/stop times of scheduled / p

Classes and Instructional Labs

´ Schedule more 8am class start times

´ Develop a block schedule for 2 hour and 1 hour

classes 8-9am, 9-11am,11-1pm as a framework for scheduling

for scheduling

´ Further study seat utilization and compare to ideal class size by

disciplinep

´ Utilize the Scheduling Software for optimizing /compacting the

schedule

f

´ Develop a pool of standard classrooms on a block schedule to

increase utilization

´ Study the number of classes and time length

ICCCFO SPRING 2011 CONFERENCE

(29)

SUMMARY

65% S d d f

d Cl

U ili i

´

65% - Standard for good Classroom Utilization

during Peak Times

g

´

Peak times – Monday – Thursday 8-1pm,

5-0

10pm

40 h

l St d d f T t l Cl

´

40 hour rule – Standard for Total Classroom

Use during a week – 24/7

´

Seat Utilization vs. Average Class Size

ICCCFO SPRING 2011 CONFERENCE

(30)

ICCCFO

ICCCFO

SPRING 2011CONFERENCE

THANK YOU

Michael Lundeen & Peter Krupczak

References

Related documents

2,100-well vial CBP bromodomain Ligand/APC Acceptor Mixture (9,600-well kit): For five 384-well plates, add 3 ml of 1X TR-FRET Assay Buffer to one vial of the CBP

Study II which compared outcomes of survivors with the general population, showed that survivors had poorer self-perception outcomes in domains of peers, work, body image,

Joyce and colleagues (1993) indicated: “The centrality of student learning becomes lost as the details of program implementation become ends in themselves.”

The current privacy options available for use in mobile and wearable devices do not allow an individual to know with certainty how sensitive information will be used or for how

For all time scales displayed, the entropy values for the control group were higher than for the depression group, indicating that the heart rate dynamics of healthy subjects are

The results of this study support the theory that the Customer Satisfaction Affect Customer Trust, because for customers who are satisfied with the services provided

The study seeks to determine why competitive intelligence is necessary in the manufacturing sector; to ascertain how ive intelligence; and to assess the nature of the The

We are going forward with our demand to form a Canadian strawberry promotion and research council and we would like to discuss the project with some strawberry producers of