• No results found

Durenedi­methanol

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Durenedi­methanol"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Acta Cryst.(2003). E59, o1089±o1091 DOI: 10.1107/S1600536803014223 Doyle Britton C12H18O2

o1089

organic papers

Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online

ISSN 1600-5368

Durenedimethanol

Doyle Britton

Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators Single-crystal X-ray study T= 174 K

Mean(C±C) = 0.002 AÊ Rfactor = 0.043 wRfactor = 0.104

Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.1

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2003 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved

Durenedimethanol (2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-1,4-phenylenedimeth-anol), C12H18O2, crystallizes in space groupI41/a with a

three-dimensional structure held together by OÐH O hydrogen

bonds. The hydrogen bonds have a fourfold helical arrange-ment. The molecule lies on a crystallographic center of symmetry.

Comment

Shan & Jones (2001) have reported the structure of 1,4-benzenedimethanol, a molecule of potential use in crystal engineering. The structure of the durene analog, durenedi-methanol, (I), is reported here.

The labeling and the anisotropic displacement parameters are shown in Fig. 1. The molecule lies on a crystallographic center of symmetry. The bond lengths and angles are normal. The ring is planar within experimental error [displacements (AÊ): C1 ÿ0.001 (1), C2 0.001 (1), C3 0.001 (1)], but the substituents are distinctly puckered [displacements: C4

ÿ0.108 (1), C5 0.108 (1), C6ÿ0.052 (1)]. These displacements are similar to those in hexamethylbenzene (Le MagueÁReset al., 2001).

The packing is shown in Fig. 2. A 41screw axis of hydrogen

bonds can be clearly seen. The distances and angles in the hydrogen bonds are given in Table 1, where they are compared with those in benzenedimethanol (Shan & Jones, 2001) and benzenediisopropanol (KoritsaÂnszky & Menczel, 1982). All of the individual hydrogen-bond parameters in durenedi-methanol and benzenedidurenedi-methanol are virtually identical. The

benzenediisopropanol has OÐH O angles that are further

from linear and slightly longer O O distances. For discus-sions of hydrogen bonding in alcohols, see Brock & Duncan (1994) and Brock (2002).

The packings in the three structures are quite different. In all three, the graph sets (Etter et al., 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995) for the dominant interactions are the same,C(2), if we consider all chemically equivalent OH groups to be the same. However, in benzenedimethanol adjacent OH groups in the chain are crystallographically independent so that an alter-native description would be C22(4); together they form a

pseudo-twofold screw axis. In benzenediisopropanol three adjacent OH groups in the chain are crystallographically

(2)

organic papers

o1090

Doyle Britton C12H18O2 Acta Cryst.(2003). E59, o1089±o1091

independent and the alternative description would beC33(6);

together they form a pseudo-threefold screw axis. In durenedimethanol there is only one OH in the asymmetric unit, which is involved in interactions via a crystallographic fourfold screw axis.

If we return to considering the chemically equivalent OH groups the same, so that the basic graph sets are the same, the complex graph sets show the differences clearly: benzenedi-methanol C(2)[C(9)][R44(22)], benzenediisopropanol C

(2)-[C(9)][R22(18)][R66(26)] and durenedimethanolC(2)[R44(36). In

the ®rst two, the overall hydrogen bonding leads to two-dimensional networks, while in durenedimethanol it leads to a three-dimensional network.

Finally, it should be noted that durenedimethanol and its

isomer dimethoxydurene (Wieczorek et al., 1975) have the

same molecular volumes within experimental error despite the great differences in their intermolecular interactions and packing.

Experimental

The compound was obtained from the Shell Development Co. Satisfactory crystals grew as prisms from ethanol.

Crystal data C12H18O2

Mr= 194.26

Tetragonal,I41=a

a= 16.042 (4) AÊ

c= 8.656 (2) AÊ

V= 2227.6 (9) AÊ3

Z= 8

Dx= 1.159 Mg mÿ3

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 3471

re¯ections

= 2.5±25.0

= 0.08 mmÿ1

T= 174 (2) K Prism, colorless 0.380.220.22 mm Data collection

Siemens SMART area-detector diffractometer

!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996; Blessing, 1995)

Tmin= 0.97,Tmax= 0.98 5239 measured re¯ections

990 independent re¯ections 871 re¯ections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.025 max= 25.1

h=ÿ19!13

k=ÿ18!19

l=ÿ10!9

Re®nement Re®nement onF2

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.043

wR(F2) = 0.104

S= 1.13 990 re¯ections 70 parameters

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained re®nement

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.04P)2

+ 1.83P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max= 0.001 max= 0.16 e AÊÿ3 min=ÿ0.16 e AÊÿ3

Table 1

Distances and angles (AÊ,) in the OÐH O hydrogen bonds.

O H O OÐH OÐH O H O H OÐC C O Ref.

O1 H1 O1i 0.87 (2) 175 (2) 1.85 (2) 120 (2) 2.717 (2) a O1 H1 O2 0.90 (3) 174 (2) 1.82 (3) 119 (2) 2.714 (2) b

O2 H2 O1 0.92 (2) 170 (2) 1.81 (3) 123 (2) 2.725 (2) b

O1 H1 O3 1.07 (4) 155 (3) 1.75 (4) 124 (3) 2.757 (4) c

O3 H3 O2 0.97 (4) 161 (3) 1.84 (4) 125 (3) 2.779 (4) c

O2 H2 H1 0.97 (4) 156 (3) 1.93 (4) 124 (3) 2.848 (4) c

Symmetry code: (i)3

4ÿy;14‡x;14‡z. References: (a) durenedimethanol (this work); (b)

benzenedimethanol (Shan & Jones, 2001); (c) benzenediisopropanol (KoritsaÂnszky & Menczel, 1982).

The methyl and methylene H atoms were included at idealized positions, with the methyl groups allowed to rotate around the CÐC bonds. The hydroxy H atom was re®ned with an isotropic displace-ment parameter. The CÐH distances were ®xed at 0.99 AÊ for methylene and 0.98 AÊ for methyl H atoms. The isotropic displace-ment parameters for both were ®xed at 1.5 times theUeqvalue of the attached C atom.

Data collection:SMART(Siemens, 1995); cell re®nement:SAINT

(Siemens, 1995); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1994); program(s) used to re®ne structure:SHELXTL; molecular graphics:SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXTL.

References

Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995).Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.34, 1555±1573.

Figure 1

A view of the molecule of (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. The unlabeled atoms are related to the labeled atoms by a center of symmetry.

Figure 2

(3)

Blessing, R. H. (1995).Acta Cryst.A51, 33±38. Brock, C. P. (2002).Acta Cryst.B58, 1025±1031.

Brock, C. P. & Duncan, L. L. (1994).Chem. Mater.6, 1307±1312.

Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990).Acta Cryst.B46, 256± 262.

KoritsaÂnszky, T. & Menczel, G (1982).Acta Cryst.B38, 1617±1619.

Le MagueÁRes, P., Lindemann, S. V. & Kochi, J. K. (2001).Organometallics,20, 115±125.

Shan, N. & Jones, W. (2001).Acta Cryst.E57, o1233±o1244.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1994). SHELXTL Version 5. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996).SADABS. University of GoÈttingen, Germany. Siemens (1995).SMARTandSAINT. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments

Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Wieczorek, M. W., Bokiy, N. G. & Struchkov, Y. T. (1975).Roczn.Chem.49, 1737±1741; perStruct. Rep.41B, 135±136.

(4)

supporting information

sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1089–o1091

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1089–o1091 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803014223]

Durenedimethanol

Doyle Britton

2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-1,4-phenylenedimethanol

Crystal data C12H18O2 Mr = 194.26

Tetragonal, I41/a

Hall symbol: -I 4ad a = 16.042 (4) Å c = 8.656 (2) Å V = 2227.6 (9) Å3 Z = 8

F(000) = 848

Dx = 1.159 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 3471 reflections θ = 2.5–25.0°

µ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 174 K Prism, colorless 0.38 × 0.22 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Siemens SMART area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan

(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996; Blessing, 1995) Tmin = 0.97, Tmax = 0.98

5239 measured reflections 990 independent reflections 871 reflections with I > 2σ(I) Rint = 0.025

θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 2.5° h = −19→13

k = −18→19 l = −10→9

Refinement Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043 wR(F2) = 0.104 S = 1.13 990 reflections 70 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.04P)2 + 1.83P]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max = 0.001

Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3

Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

O1 0.24536 (7) 0.57226 (7) 1.01908 (13) 0.0349 (3)

C1 0.22445 (9) 0.69735 (9) 0.86954 (17) 0.0273 (4)

(5)

supporting information

sup-2 Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1089–o1091

C3 0.28809 (9) 0.75530 (9) 0.89553 (17) 0.0285 (4)

C4 0.19336 (10) 0.64436 (10) 1.00204 (18) 0.0346 (4)

H4A 0.1941 0.6773 1.0987 0.042*

H4B 0.1352 0.6268 0.9819 0.042*

C6 0.33110 (12) 0.76037 (12) 1.0506 (2) 0.0456 (5)

H6A 0.3130 0.8109 1.1046 0.055*

H6B 0.3916 0.7622 1.0353 0.055*

H6C 0.3166 0.7113 1.1125 0.055*

C5 0.12389 (13) 0.62375 (13) 0.6888 (3) 0.0555 (6)

H5A 0.1346 0.6004 0.5861 0.067*

H5B 0.0678 0.6480 0.6915 0.067*

H5C 0.1280 0.5795 0.7664 0.067*

H1 0.2254 (13) 0.5450 (13) 1.098 (3) 0.054 (6)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

O1 0.0455 (7) 0.0308 (6) 0.0285 (6) 0.0067 (5) 0.0128 (5) 0.0084 (5)

C1 0.0304 (8) 0.0264 (7) 0.0250 (8) 0.0037 (6) 0.0072 (6) 0.0031 (6)

C2 0.0304 (8) 0.0291 (8) 0.0307 (8) −0.0028 (6) 0.0007 (6) 0.0011 (6)

C3 0.0336 (8) 0.0281 (8) 0.0239 (8) 0.0025 (6) −0.0012 (6) −0.0002 (6)

C4 0.0401 (9) 0.0335 (8) 0.0301 (8) 0.0069 (7) 0.0116 (7) 0.0074 (7)

C6 0.0595 (12) 0.0459 (10) 0.0315 (9) −0.0017 (9) −0.0116 (9) 0.0030 (8)

C5 0.0557 (12) 0.0538 (12) 0.0568 (13) −0.0225 (10) −0.0116 (10) 0.0107 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O1—C4 1.434 (2) C4—H4A 0.9900

O1—H1 0.87 (2) C4—H4B 0.9900

C1—C3 1.399 (2) C6—H6A 0.9800

C1—C2 1.400 (2) C6—H6B 0.9800

C1—C4 1.512 (2) C6—H6C 0.9800

C2—C3i 1.401 (2) C5—H5A 0.9800

C2—C5 1.512 (2) C5—H5B 0.9800

C3—C2i 1.402 (2) C5—H5C 0.9800

C3—C6 1.512 (2)

C4—O1—H1 105.8 (13) C1—C4—H4B 109.7

C3—C1—C2 120.29 (13) H4A—C4—H4B 108.2

C3—C1—C4 119.48 (14) C3—C6—H6A 109.5

C2—C1—C4 120.18 (14) C3—C6—H6B 109.5

C1—C2—C3i 119.93 (14) H6A—C6—H6B 109.5

C1—C2—C5 121.24 (14) C3—C6—H6C 109.5

C3i—C2—C5 118.78 (15) H6A—C6—H6C 109.5

C1—C3—C2i 119.73 (14) H6B—C6—H6C 109.5

C1—C3—C6 120.78 (14) C2—C5—H5A 109.5

C2i—C3—C6 119.49 (14) C2—C5—H5B 109.5

(6)

supporting information

sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1089–o1091

O1—C4—H4A 109.7 C2—C5—H5C 109.5

C1—C4—H4A 109.7 H5A—C5—H5C 109.5

O1—C4—H4B 109.7 H5B—C5—H5C 109.5

C3—C1—C2—C3i −2.7 (2) C2—C1—C3—C6 −177.21 (15)

C4—C1—C2—C3i 174.78 (14) C4—C1—C3—C6 5.3 (2)

C3—C1—C2—C5 174.74 (15) C3—C1—C4—O1 −84.95 (17)

C4—C1—C2—C5 −7.8 (2) C2—C1—C4—O1 97.56 (17)

C2—C1—C3—C2i 2.7 (2) C1—C2—C5—H5B 101.7

C4—C1—C3—C2i −174.80 (14) C1—C3—C6—H6A −107.3

References

Related documents

(Siemens, 1994); data reduction: SAINT ; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Siemens, 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL ; molecular graphics: SHELXTL

(Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT ; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXTL ; molecular graphics: SHELXTL

(Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT ; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXTL ; molecular graphics: SHELXTL

(Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT ; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXTL ; molecular graphics: SHELXTL

(Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT ; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXTL ; molecular graphics: SHELXTL

(Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT ; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXTL ; molecular graphics: SHELXTL

(Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT ; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXTL ; molecular graphics: SHELXTL

SMART ; data reduction: SAINT (Siemens, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1994); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXTL ; molecular graphics: SHELXTL