warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications
Original citation:
Uddin, Kotub, Somerville, Limhi, Barai, Anup, Lain, Michael J., Rajan, Ashwin T., Jennings,
Paul A. and Marco, James. (2017) The impact of high-frequency-high-current perturbations
on film formation at the negative electrode-electrolyte interface. Electrochimica Acta, 233 .
pp. 1-12.
Permanent WRAP URL:
http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/86932
Copyright and reuse:
The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work of researchers of the
University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions.
This article is made available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC
BY-NC-ND 4.0) license and may be reused according to the conditions of the license. For
more details see:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
A note on versions:
The version presented in WRAP is the published version, or, version of record, and may be
cited as it appears here.
The
impact
of
high-frequency-high-current
perturbations
on
fi
lm
formation
at
the
negative
electrode-electrolyte
interface
Kotub
Uddin
a,*
,
Limhi
Somerville
b,
Anup
Barai
a,
Michael
Lain
a,
T.R.
Ashwin
a,
Paul
Jennings
a,
James
Marco
aaWMG,InternationalDigitalLaboratory,TheUniversityofWarwick,CoventryCV47AL,UK b
JaguarLandRover,BanburyRoad,WarwickCV350XJ,UK
ARTICLE INFO
Articlehistory:
Received17November2016
Receivedinrevisedform2March2017 Accepted3March2017
Availableonline7March2017
Keywords:
Highfrequencycurrent Lithiumion
Degradation Cellautopsy
Electrochemicalmodelling
ABSTRACT
LongtermageingexperimentalresultsshowthatdegradationresultingfromcoupledDCandACcurrent waveformsleadtoadditionaldegradationoflithium-ionbatteriesabovethatexperiencedthroughpure DCcycling.More profoundly,suchexperimentsshowadependencyofbatterydegradation onthe frequencyofACperturbation.Thispaperaddressestheunderlyingcausalityofthisfrequencydependent degradation.Cellautopsytechniques,namelyX-rayphotoelectronspectroscopy(XPS)ofthenegative electrodesurfacefilm,showgrowthofsurfacefilmcomponentswiththesuperimpositionofanAC waveform.XPSresultsshowthathighfrequencyACperturbationsleadtotheincreasedformationofa passivatingfilm.Inordertodeterminethecauseofthisincreasedfilmformation,aheterogeneous electrochemicalmodelfortheLiNiCoAlO2/C6lithiumionbatterycoupledwithgoverningequationsfor
theelectricaldouble-layerandsolidelectrolyteinterfacefilmgrowthisdeveloped.Simulationresults suggestthattheincreasedgrowthofsurfacefilmisattributedtofrequencydependentheatgeneration. ThisisduetoionkineticsinthedoublelayerwhicharegovernedbythePoisson-Boltzmannequation. Additionalthermalandreferencecellrelaxationexperimentsareundertakenthatfurthercorroborates theconclusionthatheatgenerationwithinthebatteryisafunctionoftheACexcitationfrequency throughresistivedissipationandtheentropyofthecellreaction.
©2017TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
1.Introduction
Lithium-ion(li-ion)cellsarerecognisedasacentraltechnology intheprocessofachievingacleanandsustainableenergyfuture throughtheelectrificationofroadtransportandtheuseof grid-connected energy storage to underpin the increased use of renewableenergy sources [1,2]. Within each application, a key enablingtechnology is thedesign and integrationof thepower electronicsubsystems that are requiredto manage theflowof energy [3]; suchsubsystems areknown to generateundesired electrical noise [4–6]. For example, Fig. 1 shows the current waveformfromcharginga NissanLeaf vehicleusinga commer-ciallyavailable3 kWEltekValere bi-directionalvehiclecharger.
Fig.1 highlightsthemeasuredharmoniccontentpresentonthe electricalinputtothebattery.
Highfrequencycurrentoscillations,orripple,ifunhinderedwill addafurtherperturbativeloadontothevehicle’sbatterysystem.In
recentwork,Uddinet.al.[7]measuredtheelectricalnoiseonthe DC linkofahighvoltagebusonapre-production serieshybrid electricvehicleduringaregenerativebreakingevent[7].Thisdata was used to define the current waveforms that batteries are exposed toduring typicalelectricoperation. Longterm battery degradation resulting from cycling batteries under such wave-forms was studiedin [7]. The authors showthat exposing the batterytocoupleddirectcurrent(DC)andalternatingcurrents(AC) lead to additional battery degradation that is related to the frequency of the perturbative ripple current. Through the experimental datapresented,theauthorswereabletoquantify theimpactofACexcitationatthecell-level.However,theauthors werenotabletoprovideanyreasoningforthebatterydegradation. Furthermore,giventhenoveltyoftheresultpresented[7],itwas notpossibletoexplainthecausalityofdegradationduetoACripple excitationdirectlyfromliterature.
Thispaperextendstheresearchpresentedin[7]byseekingto explaintheunderlyingcausalityofdegradationresultingfromhigh frequencyripplecurrent.Thisisachievedthroughacombinationof furtherexperimentalanalysisandnovelmathematicalmodelling.
* Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+4402476150736;fax:+4402476524307.
E-mailaddress:[email protected](K.Uddin).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.020
0013-4686/©2017TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Electrochimica
Acta
X-rayphotoelectronspectroscopy(XPS)isemployedtostudythe degradedcells used inourpreviouswork[7].A heterogeneous electrochemical model based on continuum theory has been developed and used to investigate the dependency of cell degradationonthefrequencyofanACperturbation.Themodel relates battery degradation to the frequency dependant heat generationin the electrical double layer resulting from super-imposedACloadswhichisknowntopromotemorepronounced growthof solidelectrolyteinterface(SEI)film[8].Thermaland reference electrode relaxation experiments are presented that demonstratetheprocesses involved,tofurther understandand explainbatterydegradationwhenthecellisexposedtoACcurrent excitation.
This paper is structured as follows: in the next section, experimental methodologies pertaining to results presented in this paper are agglomerated and presented. In Section 3, a heterogeneous electrochemical model that accounts for ion dynamics in the electrical double-layer through the Poisson-Boltzmann equation is presented. The model suggeststhat the causeofcelldegradationundercoupledACandDCwaveformsis theincreasedheatgeneration.Themodelresultsaresubstantiated byexperimental results presentedinSections4. Longtermcell ageingtestresults,wherecellswerecycled1200timesunderanAC andDCcoupledwaveform,arepresented;XPSautopsyresultsfor thesecells showa frequencydependantgrowth ofsurfacefilm. Finally,inSection5weconcludeandstatefurtherwork.
2.Experimental
2.1.LongTermAgeingTest
It isbeyondthescopeofthispapertoexplain,indetail,the originalexperimentalageingstudy.Thisworkispresentedin[7].A full description of the aims and objectives, the methods and equipmentemployedarepresented.However,forcompletenessa briefsummary is provided in this subsection, highlighting key aspectsofthework.
Fifteen commerciallyavailable 3.0 Ah18650-typecells were cycled[7].EachcellhadaLiC6negativeelectrode,Li(Ni0.822Co0.148
Al0.030)O2(NCA) positiveelectrode,separated bya polyethylene
separator, sandwiched between two current collectors and
immersed in an electrolyte solution comprising of ethylene carbonate(EC),ethylmethylcarbonate(EMC),vinylenecarbonate (VC)andLiPF6salt.
Each cellwas cycled usinga DC current signal(IDC) super-positionedwithanACperturbationIACsin(
v
t)suchthattheoverall current(I)waveformwas:I¼IDCþIACsinð
v
tÞ ð1Þwitharesultingcellpotential:
V¼VDCþVACsinð
v
tu
Þ ð2Þwhere
u
isaphaseshiftbetweenthecellpotentialandcurrent waveform. The test signals were generated using a bespoke amplifiertogeneratetheACwaveformandaBitrodecellcyclerto generatetheDCloadprofile.Inaddition,aTektronixnon-contact currentprobeandoscilloscopewasusedfordataacquisitionand testmonitoring.ALAUDAheatingandcoolingsystemwasusedto ensurethattheambienttemperaturewasmaintainedat25C.TheDCportionofthecyclestartedwitha0.8Ccycledischarge (where Ccycle is the de-rated battery C-rate, i.e., the value of retaineddischargecapacityafteranageingcharacterisationtest) from95%SOCcycleto65%SOCcycle(whereSOCcycleisthestateof chargedefined byCcycle).Followingarestperiodof10minutes, each cellwasthen chargedusing astandard ConstantCurrent– ConstantVoltage(CC-CV)protocol,inwhichthecellwascharged (CC)totheuppercellpotentiallimitof4.1V(correspondingto95% SOCcycle)atwhichpointchargingcontinuedusingaCVmethod untilthevalueofcurrentreducedto0.15A.Superimposedontothe DCcyclewasoneoffourACcurrentexcitations,offrequency:10 Hz,55 Hz,254Hz and14.8kHz–withapeak-to-peakcurrentof 1.2Ccycle.Toimprovetherobustnessofthetestmethodandthe efficacyoftheresults,threecellsofthesametypewereexercised usingeachcurrentwaveformdefinedabove.
Ageingcharacterisationwascarriedoutafter300,600,900and 1200completecharge–dischargecycles.Thecharacterisationtests involveda1Ccapacityretentiontests;pulsepowertestsusing10 secondpulsesat20%,40%,60%,80%and100%ofthemanufacturers recommendedmaximumcontinuouschargeanddischargecurrent at 90%, 50% and 20% state of charge (SoC); electrochemical impedancespectroscopytestswerealsocarriedoutat90%,50% and20%SoCusingaSolartronModuLabEISSystem.
Fig.1.ThelefthandpanelshowsthemeasurementofacoupledDC-ACcurrent.Thescopesettingswere:100msperdivision,with106
2.2.CellAutopsy
Threesamplesweretakenfromeachcell,approximately160 mmfromthetopofthelatitudinalaxis(wheretopisdefinedasthe startofthejellyroll)alongthefirsthalfofthelengthofthejellyroll asopened.Thispositionwaschoseninordertoavoidthecentral bandonthelongitudinalaxisofan18650- typecellwhich has unusuallyhighresistancesattributedtopoorelectrodewetting[9]. Thissample locationalsoavoidstheinner windings ofthecell which ispronetode-lamination [9].Allthree samplesshowed good agreement in peak positions and widths. To ensure that sampleinhomogeneitydoesnotaffectresults,alargeellipticalwas usedequatingtoananalysedelectrodeareacontainingbetween 500and1000graphiteparticles.
XPS provides information on the chemical environment of elementalspeciesfromthetop<10nmofasamplesurface.Since electrodesamplesareusuallycoveredwithanumberofdeposits, inthisworkthesamplewassputteredat500eVwithanAr+ion sputter gun for 90seconds to remove the salts, solvents and depositsfromthetopoftheelectrodesurface.Thesurfacefilmwas deemed ready for analysis if the relative peak areas after an episodeof sputteringdidnot change.Thissametechniquewas employedinarecentstudypublishedin[9].Asshowninthework of Somerville et. al., it is possible to determine the total contribution tothe chemical environments of the surface film (e.g., C-O, because it surrounds the active material particles compared to graphite C-C), providing a relative surface film thickness[9].Afteracquisition,allspectrawerereferencedtotheC 1speakat 284.4eV(aftersputtering).Thepeakswereassigned usingShirleybackgroundsandmixedGaussian-Lorentzian(Voigt) lineshapes.
Sampleswereanalysedin duplicatewitha KratosAxis Ultra DLD spectrometer and a Thermo k-alpha+ spectrometer. Both
maintainedabasepressureofcirca.21010mbarduringanalysis.
XPSmeasurementswereperformedusingamonochromaticAlka x-ray sourceand conducted at roomtemperatureat a take-off angleof90 withrespecttotheparallelsurface.The corelevel spectrawere recordedusinga pass energyof 20eV(resolution approx.0.4eV),acrossanellipticalareaofcirca.300
m
m700m
m.2.3.CellPotentialRelaxation
Cell potential relaxation in the electrolyte adjacent to the electrodewasinvestigatedusingthreeelectrodecellscontaining threelithiummetalelectrodes(working,counterandreference). Lithium electrodes were preferred over intercalation electrode materialsbecauseifthelatterhadbeenused,thecellpotential relaxationtransientwouldalsoreflectsolidstatediffusion,either towardsorawayfromtheparticlesurface.TheSwagelok1three electrode cells, which were used for this test, contained three layersofseparator;aglassfibrelayer(GF/A)tominimisetheriskof dendrites, with porous polyethylene layers on either side. The electrolytewas1moldm3LiPF
6inEC:EMC(3:7),witha2wt%
(weightpercentage)VC.
The cells were tested on a Bio-Logic VMP3 multi-channel potentiostat.Aftersomeconditioningchargeanddischargepulses, individual tests were used for each measurement. A single frequency galvanostatic impedance was performed, with an appliedcurrentof+0.1mAcm2or0.1mAcm2.Thefoursingle
frequenciesusedwereselectedtomatchtheotherexperimentsi.e.
10 Hz, 55 Hz, 254 Hz and 14.8 kHz. The number of repeat
measurements was adjusted in the range 300–500. The AC perturbationwas appliedforone minute ineach case. Thecell potential relaxation curves following theAC perturbationwere thencomparedforthefourfrequencies.
Cell potential relaxation experiments are used to further deduce information on ion concentration at the electrode-electrolyteboundarywhichisknowntoimpactheatgeneration thoughtheheatofmixing.Experimentalresultsfromthisstageof theresearcharepresentedinanddiscussedinSection6.3.
3.Theory
In this section, we develop an electrochemical model that accuratelydescribesthehighfrequencydynamicsonalithiumion battery.Thismodelisthenemployedtounderstandthetheoretical impactofcoupledACandDCwaveformsonlithium ionbattery degradationwithinthecontextofelectrochemistrytheory.
3.1.Modelformulation
Withinthefieldofelectrochemicalenergystorage,DoyleFuller and Newman’s model [19] based on principles of transport phenomena,electrochemistryandthermodynamicsiswell estab-lished.Themodelsolvesfortheelectrolytephaseconcentration:
@
ðe
eceÞ@
t ¼r D ef f e rce
þ1t
0
þ
F asj ð3Þ
solidphaseconcentration:
@
ðe
scsÞ@
t ¼Ds r2
@
@
r r2
@
cs@
r
ð4Þ
electrolytephasepotential:
r
k
ef f e rf
e
þr
k
ef f e;DrlnðceÞh i
¼asj ð5Þ
andsolidphasepotential:
r:
s
ef f s rf
s
¼asj ð6Þ
where c is concertation,
f
is the electrode potential,e
is porosity,Deff,s
effandkeffaretheeffectivediffusioncoefficient, conductivityandchargetransfercoefficient,respectively,t0þisthe
transferencenumber,asisthespecificsurfaceareaoftheelectrode and j isthe current density;thesubscripts eand s denote the electrolyteand solidphase respectively. Doyle,Fullerand New-man’smodelconsistsofthreeprimarydomains(seeFig.2):the negativeelectrode(inthisworkLiC6),theseparator(inthiswork
polyethylene)andthepositiveelectrode(inthisworkLiNiCoAlO2)
permeated by electrolyte solution. During electrical discharge, lithiumionsthatoccupyinterstitialsiteswiththeLiC6electrode
diffusetothesurfacewheretheyreact(de-intercalate)andtransfer fromasolidintoaliquidphase.Theionsthendiffuseandmigrate throughtheelectrolytesolutionviatheseparatortothepositive electrode where theyreact(intercalate) and occupy interstitial siteswithinthemetaloxidematerial.Duringelectricalcharging the reversereactions takeplace, in summary:lithium ions de-intercalatefromthepositiveelectrode(metaloxide)and interca-latewithinthenegativeelectrode(carbon).Duetothewidespread acceptanceoftheDoyleFullerandNewmanmodel,itsufficeshere to refer interested readersto Refs.[19–22]for more details of modelformulationandboundaryconditions.
In theDoyle Fullerand Newmanelectrochemicalmodel the reactionkineticsaremodelledbytheButler-Volmerequation
j¼asj0 exp
a
aF RT
h
exp
a
cF RTh
ð7Þ
positiveelectrode(
h
p)andSEIas(h
SEI)[23]:h
n¼f
sf
eU Rf ilmjLiþas j ð8Þ
h
p¼f
sf
eU ð9Þh
SEI¼f
sf
eUref Rf ilmjeas j: ð10Þ
ThepassivatingfilmresistanceRfilmisseparatedintoelectronic andionicconurbationsbecausetheSEIlayerispermeableto Li-ionsbutimpermeabletoelectrolyteandelectrons.Ontheother hand, the anodic reaction xLi++xe+Li
1xC6$LiC6 takes place
inside the electrode particle; the ions that participate in the reactionpassthroughtheSEIreducingtheirelectricalpotential. Thisisrepresentedbythelastterminequation(8).
It is wellunderstoodthat theButler-Volmer equation (7) is unable,in thehighfrequencyregime,toreproduce thecoupled resistanceandsurface-capacitancebehaviourobservedin electro-chemicalimpedancespectroscopytests[20].Toaddressthisissue, theauthorsextendtheoriginalmodel,employingthetechnique presentedbyXiaoand Choe[24].The electrolyteadjoiningthe particleisdividedintotworegions:thebulkregionandthedouble layer(DL) which itselfis composed of thediffuse layerwith a thicknessof110nmandtheSternplanewithathicknessequalto thesumofthediametersofananionandasolventmolecule[25].A schematicdiagramoftheseregionsaredepictedinFig.2.Lithium ionstravelthroughtheDLandparticipateinchemicalreactionsat thesurfaceofthesolidparticleswhiletheanionsthatdonottake partinthechemical reactionsareblocked outsideof theStern plane[24].Duetotheensuingelectrolytepotential,theDLregionis assumednottobechargeneutralwhilethebulkischargeneutral. Furthermore,thetransport ofcations (lithiumions) andanions (PF6-)intheDLisassumedtobegovernedbytheirrespectivelocal chemicalpotential gradientsdeterminedbyelectrostatic poten-tials and ion concentration gradients. In this formulation, ion kineticsintheDLregionisgovernedbythePoisson-Boltzmann
equation
r2
f
DLþ F Ec
þc
ð Þ¼0 ð11Þ
whereEisthepermittivityofdielectricsolvent,FisFaraday’s constant and the subscripts+and–relate to cation and anion respectively.Chargeconservationisgivenby
@
cDL
@
t ¼b
Fr2@
@
r r2c
DL
@m
DL
@
r
ð12Þ
wherethesubscriptDLdenotesthedoublelayer,
b
istheion mobilityandm
isthechemicalpotentialdefinedasm
DL¼F
f
DLþRTln cDL
: ð13Þ
Insteadofelectroneutrallity,asassumedbyDoyle,Fullerand Newmanforthebulkregion,herethePoisson-Boltzmannequation isusedtocalculatethechemicalpotentialgiveninequation(13). Formoredetaileddiscussiononthederivationofequations(11) -(13),readersaredirectedtoRef.[24].Modelparametersusedin thisstudyareprovidedintheAppendix.
3.2.NumericalMethod
areiterateduntiltheresidualerrorreducestobelowthespecified thresholdvalue.Thisstudyassumes1.01003A/cm3astheerror limitforcurrentdensitiesonbothelectrodes.
3.3.Electrochemicalmodelresults
Duringoperation, abattery typicallyworksatcellpotentials
beyond the thermodynamic stability range of the organic
electrolyte.Therefore,electrolytedecomposition,whichincludes theoxidationandreduction ofelectrolyteonthesurfaceof the cathodeandanodeoccurs.ThefactorsaffectingthesubsequentSEI layerformationonthenegativeelectrodeincludecarbonsubstrate, electrolytecomposition,additivesandtemperature[26].Assuming that the pertinent cause of degradation is the increase in passivating surface film–aswill bedemonstrated in Section 4– andgiventhatthecellsusedinthestudywereidentical,i.e.,carbon substrate,electrolytecompositionandadditiveswerethesame;it ispostulated thatdiscrepancies in batterydegradation resulted fromvaryingheatgenerationratesthatwerepresentwhen the cellswereexcitedbydifferentwaveforms.
The cell potential response and cation concentrationin the sternplaneunderacurrentloadoftheformofequation(1)with varyingfrequenciesisshowninFig.3.Ionkineticsisdrivenbythe chemical potential
m
(c.f., equation (13)) which includes both concentration and potential terms. Under the AC-DC coupled waveformsconsideredinthiswork,thegradientofthechemical potentialisalwaysone-directional,i.e.,eitherpositiveornegative. Since thepotential gradientis increasing,theamplitude of the oscillating concentration in the stern plane is also increasing (though not visible in Fig. 3 due to the short time increment presented).Withregardstocellpotential,thediscrepancyinthe amplitude of the cell potential response when galvanostatic waveformswithdifferentfrequenciesareappliedonacellresults from frequency dependant impedance of the electrochemical system.The Butler-Volmer equation governs ion kineticsin the low frequencyregime(<1Hz);thePoisson-Boltzmannequationonthe otherhandgovernshighfrequencykineticsintheDLregionand hencealsothedependencyofheatgenerationonfrequencywhen
v
10Hz. ThesimulatedheatgenerationintheDLis showninFig.4,whichhighlightsdifferencesinsimulatedheatgeneration arisingfromcurrent perturbations of differentfrequencies.The
heat generation is caused by the deviation of the surface overpotentialfromtheequilibriumstate,i.e.,resistivedissipation. Localheatgenerationp½W=cmofbothionsinDLiscalculated astheproductofchemicalpotentialgradientandionflux:
pDL¼4
p
r2@m
DL
@
r N
DL ð14Þ
wheretheionfluxinthedoublelayerNDLmol=s=cm2
isgivenby
[24]:
NDL¼
b
F cDL@m
DL
@
r ð15Þwhere
b
ionmobility.Theheatgenerationforthewholecellcan thenbeobtainedbyintegrationofpDL.ThecationfluxNþDL,whichis similarforallfourfrequencies,isdeterminedbyloadcurrent.The lithium ion chemical potentialm
þDL however, can be different between frequencies because it is affected by the electrostatic potentialf
DLwhichinteractswithanionconcentration.Theextra heatgenerationoflithium ionat14.8kHzisthuscaused bythe higher electrostatic potentialf
DL induced by the transient processesofanionsintheDL.Themodellingresultsshowthat,fortheNCA/C6cellstudiedin
thiswork,aperturbationfrequencyof14.8kHzleadstothelargest heatgeneration.Furthermore,whileaperturbativefrequencyof 254Hzgenerateslargeranionsourcedheatthan
v
<254Hz,the totalheatgenerationisdominatedbythedynamicsofthecations; heatgenerationduetoanionsisconsequentlymarginalised.For the cell consideredin this study, the ion mobility
b
+ is3.241010cm2V1s1 and
b
is 1.851010cm2V1s1. The magnitudeofcationfluxisthuslargerthantheanionflux.This is related to the larger reservoir of cations in the electrode, facilitatingarelativelymoresustainablecationfluxcomparedwith anionflux.Theconcentrationofanionsinthedoublelayeronthe otherhandislargerthancationconcertation,asfoundinRef.[24]. Electrochemical modelling results presented in this section suggestthatheatgeneratedduetoresistivedissipationwithinthe DLisrelatedtoionkinetics(i.e.,ACexcitationfrequency)described by the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Since heat is known to acceleratethe growth of SEI,the modellingresults are usedto postulatethatthegrowthofSEIfilmisdependentonthefrequency ofanACperturbation.Inthenextsection,experimentalresultsare presentedtoverifythefrequencydependantgrowthofSEI.
Fig.3.ThelefthandpanelshowscellpotentialresponsetoacurrentperturbationoftheformIDC+IACsin(vt).Therighthandpanelshowslithiumconcentrationinthestern
4.ResultsandDiscussion
4.1.LongTermAgeingTestResults
Electrochemicalimpedancespectroscopy(EIS)results compar-ingtestcellspriortocyclingandafter1200cyclesareshownin
Fig.5.TheresultspresentedinFig.5areforsinglecellswiththe medianvalueforresistancerisefromthesubsetofcellsineach frequencyband[7].Usinganalogieswithelectricalcircuitmodels, thepronouncedadditionalsemi-circleinthehighfrequencyregion of theNyquist plotforthe 254Hzand 14.8kHz ACexcitations indicatethatthereisanadditionalincreaseinresistancecoupled withsurfacelayercapacitancescomparedwiththecaseof55Hz, 10 HzandpureDCcycling.
Thefallin1Cdischargecapacityandtheriseinresistanceare showninFig.6.Capacityandpowerfadeduetosuperpositioned AC perturbationswithafrequencyof55 Hzand 10Hz areonly marginallydifferentfrompureDCcycling.Ontheotherhand,at higherfrequencies(14.8kHz),thereisanadditionalcirca.2.5%and 5%capacityandpowerfaderespectively.Giventhatautomotive end of life is defined by 20% capacity fade and a doubling of impedance[10–12],higherfrequencyACperturbationscanresult inanextra12.5%lossofusefulcapacityand 5%lossofrequired powercomparedwithlowerfrequencyACperturbations, poten-tiallyshorteningtheoperationallifetimeofanautomotivebattery byuptoone-and-a-halfyears[13].
ThebroadobservationthatcouplinganACperturbationtoaDC loadcausesmorebatterydegradationthanapureDCloadisclear, sincetheenergythroughput(Ethro)underagalvanostaticloadof theform(1)is:
Ethro¼IDCVDCtIACVDC
cosð
v
tÞþv
þIDCVACsinð
u
Þsinðv
tÞcosðu
Þcosðv
tÞv
þIACVAC cosð
u
Þt2
cosð
u
Þsinð2v
tÞþsinðu
Þcosð2v
tÞ 4v
;
ð16Þ
Inahighfrequencyregime(
v
>>1),equation(3)reducestoEthroffiIDCVDCtþIACVACcosð
u
Þ t2 ð17Þ
whichisdependentonfrequencythroughthephaseangle
u
(as will be shown in Section 6). Equations (16) and (17) clearly demonstratethatelectricalenergythroughputishigherwhenAC wavesaresuperimposedontoDCloads(i.e.,whenIAC6¼0andp
/ 2<u
<p
/2).Thecorrelationbetweenincreasedenergythroughput andincreasedbatterydegradationiswellestablished[14].Inthis sense,theresultthatcouplinganACexcitationtoaDCloadleadsto increaseddegradationconformswithwell-establishedtheory.Itis importanttonotehowever,thatenergythroughputisnottheonly stressfactorwhichacceleratesbatterydegradation.Elevatedcell temperatureisknowntoresultinmoreseveredegradationmodes[8].Arguably,themorenoteworthyresult–intermsofnovelty–is thedependencyofbatterydegradationonfrequencywhenIAc6¼0. Theremainderofthispaperexploresthisdependencyfurther.
While the results presented in Figs. 5 and Fig. 66, at a componentlevel, showthat coupledAC perturbationslead toa levelofdegradationthatexceedsthatexperiencedwithDCcycling in isolation, thefrequency dependencyof this degradationand fundamentalcausesofdegradationarenotyetfullyunderstood.In thefollowingsubsection,postmortemexaminationofthecycled cells is presented to elucidate the mechanism of degradation exacerbatedbysuperpositioningACcycling.
4.2.XPSCellAutopsyResults
TocharacterizethesurfacefilmformationresultingfromDC-AC coupled cycling, XPS analysis was completed on the graphite electrodes of four cells–(a)a control sample cell that was not cycled,(b)acellafter1200DCandACcoupledcyclesat10Hz,(c)a cellafter1200DCandACcoupledcyclesat55Hzand(d)acellafter 1200DCandACcoupledcyclesat14.8kHz.TheXPSresultsforthe C1sspectraarepresentedinFig.7.Theassignmentofchemical environmentsareconsistentwiththosefoundinliterature[15–
17].Fig.8showstheareaforthenon-graphitechemical environ-ments(concentration)relativetothefrequencyoftheACripple. However, it excludes the Li-C component in the cells. This is becauseFig. 7 shows a largeLi-Ccomponent in the‘new cell’ comparedtoallsubsequentcells.IthasbeenproposedthatLi-Cis formedfromreactionofdimethylcarbonatewithLi+followedbya
radicalinducedchainreactionwithlithiumthatisfacilitatedbythe presence of H2O and thus would primarily form directly after
manufacture[17].Thisworksupportsthatassertionbyshowinga
much higher quantity of Li-C in the new cell and lower
concentrations in each subsequent cell after testing. However, whentheLi-Cpeak isincludedincalculatingthepercentageof surfacefilm,thenewcellshowsagreaterpercentageofsurface filmformationthanthecellcycledat55Hz,eventhoughthelatter hadundergonetestingfor6months.Becausethecellperformance does not improve in the same period, its inclusion skews
subsequent results. Therefore, the values recorded in Fig. 8
discounttheLi-Cpeakascontributingtosurfacefilmeventhough itisnotgraphiteactivematerial.
Fig.7showstheformationofesters(O-C=O)andethers(C-O). Thisisconsistentwiththechemicalreductionoftheelectrolyte solventsatthesurfaceofthenegativeelectrode.Anincreaseinthe concentrationofthesecompoundsisconsistentwithsurfacefilm formation[18].Fig.8showsthattheconcentrationofsurfacefilm increaseswiththeACfrequencyused.However,thecellsubjectto 55Hzhasonly19%surfacefilmcomparedto35%at10Hz;dueto lowerconcentrationsofbothO-C=OandC-Ocomponents(Fig.7). Thecellcycledat14.8kHzcontainsmuchhigherconcentrationsof surfacefilm,primarilyduetoincreasesinchemicalcomponentsat binding energies consistent withan O-C=O chemical environ-ment.
Theseresultsestablishadependencyofpassivatingfilmgrowth onthe frequencyof anAC perturbation.Based onXPSanalysis alonetheworstcyclingconditionforcellsisathighfrequencies, reducingtohavelessimpactatlowerfrequencies.However,there isaperceivedanomalyatoraround55Hz.
Thus far, electrochemical modelling results presented in Section3,suggestthatheatgenerationwithinthecellisrelated totheACexcitationfrequencyofacurrentload.Longtermageing testresultsforcellscycledunderanumberofACandDCcoupled waveforms showthat capacity and powerfadeis progressively morepronouncedforhigherACexcitationfrequencies.XPSresults Fig.5.ThelefthandpanelshowsinitialEISresultsforallcellsmeasuredat50%SOC;therighthandpanelshowsEISresultsforcellsatdifferentfrequenciesafter1200cycles.
Fig.6. Thelefthandpanelshowsaverage1Ccapacityfadeafter1200cycles;therighthandpanelshowsaveragepowerfade(impedancerise)resultsforcellsatdifferent frequenciesafter1200cycles.Theerrorbarsindicatethemaximumandminimummeasuredvalues.Foraddedconfidence,thesemeasurementswerecarriedouttwice,once usingtheBitrodecellcyclerandasecondtimeusingtheMaccor4200Modelcellcycler;theresultsforeachcellwasthesametowithintheerroroftheequipment.For14.8
corroboratethisfindingandfurtherestablishesthatthepertinent modeof degradation is thegrowth ofpassivating films onthe negative electrode. Thus, a causal link is proposed between frequencydependantheatgenerationandSEI filmformation.In thefollowingsubsectionstherefore,resultsanddiscussionrelating toheatgenerationwithinthelithium-ioncellsispresented.
4.3.CellSurfaceTemperatureMeasurements
ItiswellestablishedthatthegrowthoftheSEIlayerisstrongly dependentonthetemperature[8].Thedifferenceincellsurface temperature resulting from the various current waveforms considered in this work is shown in Fig.9. The differences in cell surface temperature resulting from superpositioning AC harmonics is qualitatively aligned with cell ageing results presented in Section 4.1 and with the growth of surface film measured from XPS results presented in Section 4.2. More specifically, a 55 Hz excitation exhibited the lowest cell Fig.7.XPSanalysisresultsoftheC1sspectrumofanewcellandthreecellssubjectedto1200DCcycleswithdifferentimposedACfrequencies(10Hz,55Hzand14.8kHz) withtheresultsofpeakfittingshowingpossiblechemicalstates(C-C,C-O.C-Li,O-C=OandROCO2Li).
temperature (see Fig. 9) in agreement with XPS results that showedleastsurfacefilmgrowthatthisexcitationfrequency(see
Fig.8).
4.4.HeatGenerationWithinCells
There are four sources of heat generation in a lithium ion battery under operation, which include: heat generated from resistivedissipation,theentropyofthecellreaction,sidereactions andtheheatofmixing.Theenergybalancefortheelectrochemical systemisexpressedas[27]:
_
Q¼Ið
f
sf
eUÞþIT@
U@
t þX
i
D
Havgi riþZ X j
X
k
HjkHavgjk
@
cjk@
tdv ð18ÞThe first term on the right-hand side of equation (18) I (
f
sf
eU)representsirreversibleresistivedissipationcausedby thedeviationofthesurfaceoverpotentialwhichisthedifference between the solid phase potential (f
s) and electrolyte phase potential (f
e)fromthevolume averaged opencircuitpotential (OCP)duetoaresistanceofthepassageofcurrent(I).ThistermdifferswiththatofRef.[27]inthattheheatgeneratedbycelltabs arenotconsidered.Thesecondtermisthereversiblerateofheat generationduetoelectrochemicalreactions,definedasIT@U
@t ¼T@ S
@t whereSisthetotalentropyofthesystemandTisthebulkcell temperature.Thethirdtermistheheatarisingfromchemicalside reactions where theenthalpyand rateof chemical reactioniis
D
Havgi andrirespectively.Thelasttermistheheatofmixingdueto the formation and subsequent relaxation of concentration gradients,wherecjkistheconcentrationofspeciesjinphasek, Hjk andHavgjk arethepartialmolarenthalpyandaveragedpartial molarenthalpyofspeciesjinphasekrespectively,anddvisthe differentialvolumeelement.Themagnitudeofheatgeneratedbyresistivedissipationand entropicreactionarecomparable[27].InFig.10wepresentthe impedanceofthecellwhichquantifiesresistivedissipationwhich, at a cell level, can be represented as I2Z
cell. The entropic
contributiontoheatgenerationisquantifiedthroughchangein entropyDS
nF ¼@ U
@t wherenisthenumberofelectronsinvolvedina half-cellreactionandFistheFaradayconstant.Bothoftheseterms are dependent on lithium concentration in the lattice, i.e., stoichiometry.Furthermore,whileresistivedissipationisalways exothermic,inprincipleentropicheatcanbeeitherexothermicor endothermic, dependingontheentropyofthereactionandthe directionofcurrentandSoC.
Theresistance(realpartoftheimpedance)inFig.10showsthat batteryimpedanceisfrequencydependentandconsequentlyheat generation within the battery will be a function of excitation frequency. In agreement with electrical results presented in Section3,the14.8kHzexcitationfrequencyis showntohavea higherresistancevaluethanacurrentperturbationat10Hzwhich itself hasa higher resistance than a 55 Hz AC waveform. This corroborates the cell surface temperature results presented in
Fig.9 andexplainswhy 55Hz resulted inless passivating film formation.IntheBodephaseplot,thepeakoccurringcloseto105
Hzcorrespondstothesurfacefilm.SEIfilmgrowthoccursatboth boundariesoftheSEI[17,28],althoughtheseperatorsidegrowth maybedominant.UnderelevatedtemperaturestherateofSEIfilm growthatbothboundariesisincreased.FortheinnerSEIboundary, thisoccursbecausethediffusivity(D)ofionsislesshinderedat elevatedtemperatures.Thistemperaturedependencyisdescribed Fig.9.Showingcellsurfacetemperatureriseundera600seconddischargeusing
thedifferentcurrentwaveformsconsideredinthiswork.
bytheArrheniuscorrection,
D¼Dref EactR Tref1 T1
ð19Þ
whereEactistheactivationenergy.TheBodephaseplotalso showsashortplateauregionbetweenthefrequencylimits102 101Hzcorrespondingtothesemi-infinitediffusionregion.
Cell surface temperature measurements presented in Fig. 9
suggestthat heat generationwithin a cell is related tothe AC excitationfrequency.Equation(18)proposesfoursourcesofheat generation, namely resistive dissipation, electrochemical reac-tions, chemical reactions and the heat of mixing. Impedance spectroscopy results presented in Fig. 10 show that resistive dissipationwithinthe cellis frequency dependant. In the next subsection,areferenceelectrodecellpotentialrelaxation experi-mentisemployedtoinvestigatetheheatofmixing.Cellpotential relaxation is indicative of ion concentration at the electrode-electrolyteboundary,suchthatarelativelylongerrelaxationtime represents higher ion concentration. If there is a significant differenceinionconcertationattheelectrode-electrolyte bound-ary when differentexcitation frequencies areapplied, this will revealanunderlyingfrequencydependenceoftheheatofmixing. Furthermore,assumingfirst-ordersolventdecompositionkinetics, ahigherreactantconcentrationatthenegativeelectrodeboundary will,itself,facilitateanincreasedrateofSEIgrowth[29].
4.5.CellPotentialRelaxationExperimentResults
In an electrochemical system that is constantly perturbed, thermodynamicpropertiesaredeterminedbyhowthechemical distributionrespondstochanges.Therateofchangeofenthalpy (H)ofthesystemisgivenby
dH
dt ¼Q_ IV: ð20Þ
In Fig.11, theelectrode potentialafter a60 second DC step currentof0.1mA/cm2superpositionedwithanACperturbationof frequencies 10 Hz, 55 Hz, 254 Hz and 14.8 kHz is shown. The correlationbetweentheelectrodepotentialandsurface concen-trationisgivenby
Df
¼ð1tþÞRTFlncejÞx¼Le csjÞx¼x’
!
ð21Þ
wherecejx¼Le
istheconcentrationofelectrolyteatthesurfaceof thenegativeelectrodeandcs|x=xistheconcentrationoflithiumat
x = x’ in the negative electrode [30]. A slower cell potential relaxationthereforeindicatesahighersurfaceconcentrationand consequentlyamorepronouncedgrowthrateofSEIthrough:1) theheatofmixing,and2)alargerionconcentrationgradient.
ThecellpotentialrelaxationforacoupledDCandACloadwith varyingexcitationfrequencies,showninFig.11,displaysnegligible differencesbetweenthewaveforms.Thissuggeststhattheheatof mixing will not be a significant distinguishing factor. The cell potentialrelaxationresultalsosuggeststhattheconcentrationof the reacting electrolyte species at the electrolyte-electrode interfaceisnotthereasonforintensifiedSEIformationathigher frequencies.
5.Conclusion
Thispaperhasstudiedthecausalityofincreasedcell perfor-mance degradationdue tosuperimposing current rippleonDC loads.Inparticular,therelationshipbetweenthefrequencyofan ACperturbationandtheresultingbatterydegradationmeasured. Firstly,equation(16)establishedthatforacurrentloadoftheform I=IDC+IACsin(
v
t)thecellenergythroughoutishigherthanwhen IAC=0indicatingthat,justfromanenergythroughoutperspective, superpositioning an AC perturbation will lead to increased degradation. Secondly, XPS results provide explicit evidence showing that the mechanism of degradation is the increased growth of surface film. In addition, XPS results highlight a dependency of surface film formation on the frequency of the coupled AC perturbation, corroborating the electrical ageing characterisation data. Using a heterogeneous electrochemical model, thefrequency dependentformation of surface filmwas attributedtoheatgenerationwithinthedoublelayer,whereion dynamicsis governed by thePoisson-Boltzmannequation. This causalityofbatterydegradation,i.e.,theprominenceofresistive dissipation and its frequency dependence, was established by measuringcell surface temperaturefor different current wave-forms (i.e.,varying frequencyv
).The results agreedwithboth electrical ageing characterisation and autopsy results. The processesthatgenerateheatwithinthecellwerealsodiscussed. Resistive dissipation was explicitly shown to be frequency dependentandthedistinguishingfactorinheatgenerationunder highfrequencysuperpositionedACloads.Inconclusion,ifanAC perturbationiscoupledtoaDCwaveform,therateofSEIgrowthis morepronounced.TheincreasedSEIgrowthisrelatedtoincreased resistivedissipationwhichisdependentonthefrequencyoftheAC perturbation.5.1.FurtherWork
Anumberofopportunitiesexistwheretheresearchpresented heremaybefurtherextendedandrefined.Theresultscollected from both long term cycling experiments and autopsy studies suggestthatdegradation–forthecellspecimenconsideredinthis work–islowestwhenanACperturbationof55Hz,corresponding to the frequency exhibiting the lowest cell impedance in EIS results, is applied. More experimental and theoretical work is required to understand the precise nature of this effect and whetherthisfindingcanbeextendedtootherbatterytechnologies andcelltypes(i.e.,otherthanNCA/C6and18650-tyoecells).
The second areaof furtherwork, is toreduce the potential impactofcell-to-cellvariations(c.f.,Fig.5)byexpandingthescope oftheexperimentalstudytoencompassagreaternumberofcells ofagiventype.Expandingtheexperimentalprogrammeshould alsoinclude using cells from a broadercross-section of manu-facturersandchemistries. Thiswillidentifyiftheexperimental resultspresentedhereandinRef.[7]aretransferabletoothercell technologies.
In the work presented here (and in Ref. [7]), isolated AC perturbationsareconsidered.Inreality,asisshowninFig.1,there isacouplingofmultipleACperturbations.Anexperimentalstudy ontheimpactofsuchcomplexcouplingsbetweenDCandmultiple frequencyAC perturbations are required.Suchan experimental studyshouldalsoassesstherelativedegradationassociatedwith varyingthepeak–peakamplitudeoftheACcurrentwaveformin additiontotheexcitationfrequency.
Finally, given that the aim of this study was to assess the causality and impact of varying frequency for AC current perturbations,furtherresearchshouldbeundertakentodevelop andvalidateprognosticageingmodelswhichareabletoquantify thegradation.
Acknowledgements
ThisresearchwassupportedbyEPSRCgrants(EP/M507143/1) and(EP/N001745/1)andtheWMGCentreHighValue Manufactur-ingCatapult(fundedbyInnovateUK)inpartnershipwithJaguar LandRover(JLR).
AppendixA.Appendix
Negative Electrode
Separator Positive Electrode
Thicknessd(cm) 50104
25.4104
36.4104
Particleradius,Ls(cm) 1104 1104
Activematerialvolumefraction 0.580 0.500 Electrolytephasevolumefractionee 0.332 0.5 0.330
Maximumsolidphaseconcentration
cs,max(molcm3)
16.1103
23.9103
Stoichiometryat0%SOC 0.126 0.936
Stoichiometryat100%SOC 0.676 0.442 Averageelectrolyteconcentrationce
(molcm3
)
1.2103 1.2103 1.2103
Exchangecurrentdensityj0(Acm3) 3.6103 2.6103
Charge-transfercoefficientsaa,ac 0.5,0.5 0.5,0.5
SEIlayerfilmresistance,VSEI(V
cm2
)
100 100
SolidphaseLidiffusioncoefficient,Ds
(cm2s1)
21012 3.71012
Solidphaseconductivity,s(Scm1
) 1.0 0.1
ElectrolytephaseLi+
diffusion coefficient,De(cm2s1)
2.6106
2.6106
2.6106
Bruggemanporosityexponent,p 1.5 1.5 1.5 Electrolyteactivitycoefficient,f 1.0 1.0 1.0 ReferencecellpotentialUref(V) 0 0
MolecularweightMp(kgmol1) 7.3104
DensityofSEILayerre(kgcm3) 2.1103
1.51012
(Continued)
Negative Electrode
Separator Positive Electrode
Sidereactionexchangecurrent densityj0s(Acm3)
ConductivityofSEILayerkp(Scm1) 1104
Densityofelectrolytere(kgcm3) 1123106 1123106 1123106
Densityofsolidphasers(kgcm3) 1343106 2328.5
106
ElectrolytethermalConductivityle
(Wcm1
K1
)
3.39102
3.39102
3.39102
Solidphasethermalconductivityls
(Wcm1
K1
)
3.39102
3.39102
Cationmobilityb+ 3.241010 3.24
1010
3.24
1010
Anionmobilityb+ 1.851010 1.85
1010
1.85
1010
References
[1]M.Armand,J.-M.Tarascon,Buildingbetterbatteries,Nature451(7179)(2008 Feb)652–657.
[2]B.Scrosati,etal.,Lithium-ionbatteries.Alookintothefuture,EnergyEnviron. Sci.4(9)(2011)3287.
[3]T.Hutchinson,S.Burgess,G.Herrmann,Currenthybrid-electricpowertrain architectures:Applyingempiricaldesigndatatolifecycleassessmentand whole-lifecostanalysis,Appl.Energy119(2014)314–329.
[4]D.M.Erickson,W.Robert,Fundamentalsofpowerelectronics,SpringerScience &BusinessMedia,2007.
[5]M.Yilmaz,P.T.Krein,ReviewofBatteryChargerTopologies,ChargingPower Levels,andInfrastructureforPlug-InElectricandHybridVehicles,IEEETrans. PowerElectron.28(5)(2013May)2151–2169.
[6]C.Mi,F.Z.Peng,K.J.Kelly,andV.Hassani,“Topology,design,analysisand thermalmanagementofpowerelectronicsforhybridelectricvehicle applications,”J.Electr.HybridVeh.,1(3),pp.276-294.
[7]K.Uddin,A.D.Moore,A.Barai,J.Marco,Theeffectsofhighfrequencycurrent rippleonelectricvehiclebatteryperformance,Appl.Energy178(2016)142–
154.
[8]J.Vetter,P.Novák,M.R.Wagner,C.Veit,K.-C.Möller,J.O.Besenhard,M.Winter, M.Wohlfahrt-Mehrens,C.Vogler,A.Hammouche,Ageingmechanismsin lithium-ionbatteries,J.PowerSources147(1)(2005)269–281.
[9]L.Somerville,J.Bare,S.Trask,P.Jennings,A.McGordon,C.Lyness,I.Bloom,The effectofchargingrateonthegraphiteelectrodeofcommerciallithium-ion cells:Apost-mortemstudy,J.PowerSources335(2016)189–196. [10]D. Andre, C. Appel, T. Soczka-Guth, D.U.Sauer, Advanced mathematical
methodsofSOCandSOHestimationforlithium-ionbatteries,J.PowerSources 224(2013)20–27.
[11]M.Ecker,N.Nieto,S.Käbitz,J.Schmalstieg,H.Blanke,A.Warnecke,D.U.Sauer, CalendarandcyclelifestudyofLi(NiMnCo)O2-based18650lithium-ion batteries,J.PowerSources248(2014)839–851.
[12]A.Farmann,W.Waag,A.Marongiu,D.U.Sauer,Criticalreviewofon-board capacityestimationtechniquesforlithium-ionbatteriesinelectricandhybrid electricvehicles,J.PowerSources281(2015)114–130.
[13]R.Spotnitz,Simulationofcapacityfadeinlithium-ionbatteries,J.Power Sources113(1)(2003)72–80.
[14]S.Bourlot,P.Blanchard,S.Robert,Investigationofagingmechanismsofhigh powerLi-ioncellsusedforhybridelectricvehicles,J.PowerSources196(16) (2011)6841–6846.
[15]R.Dedryvère,S.Laruelle,S.Grugeon,L.Gireaud,J.-M.Tarascon,D.Gonbeau, XPSIdentificationoftheOrganicandInorganicComponentsoftheElectrode/ ElectrolyteInterfaceFormedonaMetallicCathode,J.Electrochem.Soc.152(4) (2005)A689.
[16]S.Leroy,F.Blanchard,R.Dedryvère,H.Martinez,B.Carré,D.Lemordant,D. Gonbeau,SurfacefilmformationonagraphiteelectrodeinLi-ionbatteries: AFMandXPSstudy,Surf.InterfaceAnal.37(10)(2005Oct)773–781. [17]D. Aurbach, Review of selected electrode–solution interactions which
determinetheperformanceofLiandLiionbatteries,J.PowerSources89 (2)(2000)206–218.
[18]D.Aurbach,Y.Talyosef,B.Markovsky,E.Markevich,E.Zinigrad,L.Asraf,J.S. Gnanaraj,H.-J.Kim,DesignofelectrolytesolutionsforLiandLi-ionbatteries:a review,Electrochim.Acta50(2)(2004)247–254.
[19]M.Doyle,J.Newman,Theuseofmathematicalmodelinginthedesignof lithium/polymerbatterysystems,Electrochim.Acta40(13–14)(1995Oct) 2191–2196.
[20]J.S.Newman,K.E.Thomas-Alyea,Electrochemicalsystems,J.Wiley,2004. [21]K.Smith,C.-Y.Wang,Solid-statediffusionlimitationsonpulseoperationofa
lithiumioncellforhybridelectricvehicles,J.PowerSources161(1)(2006Oct) 628–639.
ElectrochemicalBatteryModelParameters,Batteries2(2)(201626-Apr)13 MultidisciplinaryDigitalPublishingInstitute,.
[23]P.Ramadass,B.Haran,P.M.Gomadam,R.White,B.N.Popov,Developmentof FirstPrinciplesCapacityFadeModelforLi-IonCells,J.Electrochem.Soc. 151(2) (2004)A196.
[24]M. Xiao, S.-Y. Choe, Impedance model of lithium ion polymer battery consideringtemperatureeffectsbasedonelectrochemicalprinciple:PartIfor highfrequency,J.PowerSources277(2015Mar)403–415.
[25]D.C.Grahame,TheElectricalDoubleLayerandtheTheoryofElectrocapillarity, Chem.Rev.41(3)(1947Dec)441–501.
[26]M.Lu,H.Cheng,Y.Yang,Acomparisonofsolidelectrolyteinterphase(SEI)on theartificialgraphiteanodeoftheagedandcycledcommerciallithiumion cells,Electrochim.Acta53(9)(2008)3539–3546.
[27]K.E.Thomas,J.Newman,ThermalModelingofPorousInsertionElectrodes,J. Electrochem.Soc.150(2)(2003)A176.
[28]Y.Choquette,G.Brisard,M.Parent,D.Brouillette,G.Perron,J.E.Desnoyers,M. Armand,D.Gravel,N.Slougui,SulfamidesandGlymesasAproticSolventsfor LithiumBatteries,J.Electrochem.Soc.145(10)(1998)3500.
[29]M.B.Pinson,M.Z.Bazant,TheoryofSEIFormationinRechargeableBatteries: CapacityFade,AcceleratedAgingandLifetimePrediction,J.Electrochem.Soc. 160(2)(2012Dec)A243–A250.