Four Lectures Leading to the Standard Model of Particle
Physics
• Particles, Light, and Special Relativity
• Quantum Mechanics, Atoms and Particles
• Particles, Forces, and the Electroweak Interaction
• Hadrons, Strong Force and the Standard Model Illustrate, hopefully, that Physics (Science) has as ultimate
arbitrator
NATURE ! ! ! !
Some Comments re Yesterday
• Wave functions a bit more complicated:
in general functions () are COMPLEX!
• Probabilities given by * - modifying the function e
idoesn’t change prob.
• Math used in Quantum Mechanics Complex Algegra
Calculus
Matrix Algebra Group Theory
….
Intrinsic Particle Properties
• Mass
• Electric Charge, magnetic moments, +
• Angular momentum (Spin)
• Fermion or Boson
• Fundamental ( eg, electron) or composite ( eg, nuclei)
• Antiparticles
Basics of Atomic/Nuclear Physics
But Much More to Come!!
The Measurements:
Decay Rates (lifetimes) and
Cross Sections (interaction rates)
• Most familiar atoms stable
• Many atoms found that were unstable
• The instability invariably found to be in the nucleus
• Huge range of lifetimes for these nuclides
• Soon other unstable “particles”, not just nuclei hit the scene
• Some particles live long enough to make beams
The Cross Section ()- a Measure of How Often Particles Scatter (aside)
Range of some forces will be found to be
finite, so the cross section () is finite.
Rutherford saw EM
scattering (infinite
range, so infinite ).
Forces between Particles
Electromagnetic (EM) Forces
• Gravity
• Electromagnetism
Inconsequential at atomic level and smaller
Carried by real and virtual photons
EM: Virtual Photon Exchange
2 2 2
gives the approximate momentum required to keep electron bound in orbit.
No energy is required (though actual virtual photons can have either + or - energies)
so for atom case:
W
E
0
v q r
q q
v q
e e
hen
2, the photon is (Alternative statement of H. Uncert vi
ainty Pr.) rtual!
0
q
N
Feynman Diagrams
• A bit ahead of ourselves, but …
• Powerful calculational tools for interactions between particles where the force strength is not too large
• Calculations incorporate essentials of Quantum Mechanics, E&M, and Special Relativity (called Quantum Electrodynamics or QED)
• But also a language to describe particle
interactions
Quantum Picture of Interactions
Classical picture Quantum picture
“Feynman Diagram”
Charge and Interaction Coupling
2
1
137 e
c
• Strength of electromagnetic interactions characterized by a dimensionless coupling constant, :
QED brought a different way of viewing EM interactions:
• Particles interact if they have
charge, Q= 1, 2, …. (and most
elementary objects seem only
to have Q=0, 1)
Feynman Diagrams of EM Interactions
e
-e
+e
-e
+
2
Exch. has 0
e e
e e q
2
Above diagram plus one at the left:
Exch. has 0
e e
q
e e
2
"Real" photons have q 0
But New Forces between Particles Required in the Nucleus
But the nucleus contains only positive (protons) and neutral (neutrons)
particles. A NEW FORCE need to hold it together.
Nuclear Strong or
Force
15
1/3
) mA 10 .3 ~(1 r
All below held together by EM
r ~ 10
-10m
Hypothesized Carrier of Strong Force - the pion (Yukawa 1935)
Range of Strong Force implies carrier ~ 200m
eor 105 MeV/c
22 ~
force force
carrier range
m c r c
N
Range of EM infinite:
implies zero mass photon
15
1/3
) mA 10 .3 ~(1 r
Return to strong force later !!!
The Pion Would Become A Unique Object
• First nonbaryonic hadron
• Weak Interaction Decays Hints from
1933
Observations of “Mesotrons”
by 1937 intermediate in Mass View 1 View 2
Curvature and range provide mass ~ 240m
eN
Unfortunately, interactions were not strong!
Unlikely to be Yukawa’s “meson”! Wait - WWII!
Another Force: Radioactive Decay Needs to be Produced by some Force
232 90
's from Strong interactions (eg, Thorium )
( , ) ( 4, 2) 's from EM interactions
e's from nucleus, but How to get electrons without positrons?
Exampl
Streng e:
th weak!
A Z A Z
n p e ?
Angular
momentum and momentum missing??
32
P
15Pauli Hypothesis (1930) The Neutrino
Fermi & collaborators (1934-8) Dozens of new radioactive
elements with e
-in decay
New force: “weak interaction”
( , ) ( 1, ) ( 1, 1)
en A Z A Z A Z e
Always unobserved
=Rare (or weak) interactions
The Neutrino partakes of only the Weak Interaction
• Weak Interaction produces electrons and antineutrinos or positrons and neutrinos
• Names of forces reflect relative strengths:
Strong, EM, Weak, gravity. Unlike strong force, calculations possible for the weak force!
N
• Weak interaction has a finite range
… implies that this
force carrier has a
nonzero mass.
Elementary Particles Thought to Exist as of WWII
Nuclear
• protons
• neutrons
Leptons
• electrons
• neutrinos
Force fields
• photons
• pions?
• +????
Good reason to believe that every particle had an antiparticle, though only positrons had been seen.
N
• (1947) The prewar “mesotron” found to be compicated
• the expected pion (+-) of mass 140 MeV/c
2decaying promptly to the muon of mass 106 MeV/c
2…
• Rabi: wrt muon …”who ordered THAT?”
• (1950) Steinberger finds neutral pion (mass at 135 MeV/c
2)
• (1950-65) Many “hadronic” particles!
• Some very strange!
Postwar revolution 1946 - 1970
“Chaotic” Discovery Period
0
Emulsion photos
Production and Decay of Pions
Prolific
production when
enough energy is available:
28 ’s at left made by high energy
cosmic ray
sstop
product of decay has unique range
stops and
decays to
electron
Bubble Chamber Picture of
Many e Decays
Pion mass 140 MeV
Muon mass 106 MeV
Two-body decay
Three-body decay
Pions made in Strong Interactions and Decay by Weak Interactions
0
( nt g I tron S by ion uct Prod
... ):
eg
p p p p
8
eak by W ay Dec
Int se 10 2.6 (
c):
6
odu pr ay of Dec
ct m
uon : sec) 10 .2 (=2
e
e
Note that muons, electrons, and
neutrinos NOT made by S. I.
Why do we label the
neutrinos???
N
Distinct Neutrino Types:
Direct Evidence
?Absorb all
particles except neutrinos
?
Interactions
Find ONLY and NO !!!
n e p
e
1964 Nobel Prize experiment:
Schwarz, Lederman, Steinberger
BNL AGS 30 GeV p
Later Version of High Energy Neutrino Detection
meters of steel
N
X
FNAL p-acc
200 - 800 GeV
Leptons… by 1975, THREE families all with spin 1/2
• Lepton Family number conserved
• Note range of charged lepton masses
• Neutrino masses only known small
e e
e e
N
Leptons and The Weak Interaction
Leptons all engage in weak interactions
Charged leptons engage in EM interactions
Contrast hadrons, which engage in these but also in the Strong Interactions
Strong and EM Interactions preserve important global symmetries:
• same for particle-antiparticle reversal ( C )
• same for reversal of time ( T )
• same for inversion of left and right ( P )
• QED+ Proofs that combination ( CPT ) preserved
Weak Interaction and Parity
•Until 1956, generally assumed that ALL
symmetries observed by ALL interactions
• Early 1950’s:
perplexing phenomena of “strange” particles motivated question of this assumption
1956: Lee & Yang: maximal violation of parity violation in weak interactions; discovered by
C.S.Wu and corroborated by Lederman, Garwin, ...
Maximal Parity Violation in Weak Interactions
Illustrated by spin-oriented muons from pion decay.
What should happen (for P -invariance) and what does
Real world
Reflected world:
should occur with equal frequency
Never Happens
Always
happens
For Antiparticles, Opposite Occurs
-
-
-
-Never Happens Always
happens
In Pion Decays:
•Parity Always Violated
• Particle-antiparticle symmetry Always Violated
• Product ( CP ) appears valid!
Implications of Parity Violation
• Not just violated, but couldn’t be more violated (maximal)
• Many similarities to EM, but this a major dis- similarity
• Made everyone question ALL the assumptions!
• Found that particle-antiparticle symmetry ( C ) also maximally violated, so that product CP
preserved!
• In 1964, even this found violated (Fitch,
Cronin,…) but at small level ~ 2/10
3Particle Classification by Spin
Charged leptons have magnetic moments
characteristic of point-like particles, hadrons have very different magnetic moments!
max
called ( 0, 1 , 1,..) 2
( 1) and (2
"Intrinsic ang. momentum"
or SPIN
Half-integer spin particles are fermions In
1) s
teger spin particles are boson
s
s tate
z z
J m S m
s m
J s s s
Isospin - Important Classification Property
1/2
3 1
/2 2
1
e
Q I
e L
• Isospin Space - Analogous to the properties of Spin
• Leptons comprise three families with individual conserved lepton family numbers: L
e, L
, and L
.
• L
e, L
, and L
conserved in all known processes!
• Q conserved in all known processes!
• Different family members differentiated by isospin component.
• “Weak charge” of leptons correlated with I .
N
Weak Interactions and Isospin
e e
• Interesting feature of Leptons: Spin 1/2 and Isospin ½
• Wk Int change I
3• Lifetimes and cross- sections depend on G
F
2 2
2
1/
Dimensions of are 1/Energy
e F
e F
F
e G
e G mE
G
Hypothesis of Weak Boson of Finite Mass Carrying Weak Force
2
2 but unclear what these are Natural hypothesis:
but the devil in the details
F W
EM
G g
M
g
Electroweak Synthesis by Weinberg, Salaam
Specific Theory based on Electromagnetic and Weak Forces characterized in simplest case by
• massless force particles
• massless matter particles
• same couplings
Hypothesize that mass acquired through a
NEW force: “Higgs” field ---- see E. Weinberg Specific and clear predictions:
• W
bosons carry known (charged current) weak int.
• Z
0boson carries new (neutral current) weak int.
Predictions of New Neutral Current Weak Interaction
First evidence (GGM,1973) for Neutral Current processes seen in CERN experiment using
neutrinos with E ~ 2 GeV - but some questions ...
Counter Expt at Fermilab
Announced Clear Observation of Neutral Currents: 1974
~ 100 GeV
~ 100 GeV
1 m Steel
N
X
N X
~ 20%
~80%
Particle Properties Useful for Detectors:
Different Particles Interact Differently in Materials
SLD (SLAC) Detctr
Planned
LHC Detector
Known W.I. parameters permitted prediction of the masses of the
W
and Z
0bosons
0 0
p p Z X X '
Z e e
2 2 2
Reconstruct Mass
( ) ( )
Huge excess at Z e e
M E E p p
M M
1983: UA1 colliding beam at CERN
Present values:
MZ=91.19 GeV MW=80.4 GeV
N
Electroweak Unification an Essential Feature of the Standard Model
• Weak and EM Coupling Strengths
intimately connected and unify at high energies
• Q is the charge of Electromagnetism
• I
3is the charge of Charged Current Weak
• Both I
3and Q provide the charge for the Neutral Current Weak … in predictable way
• Masses of the Force Carriers predicted from EM and Weak Interaction constants
• These Masses verified with incredible
precision
Meanwhile, there were the hadrons (particles with S. Int.)
• More particles discovered than could be handled!
• But important differences:
• leptons were point-like
• hadrons had spatial extent
15 1/
3
) mA 10 .3 ~(1 r
Point-like
Isospin - Important Classification Property
1/2
3 1
/2 2
1
e
Q I
e L
• Isospin Space - Analogous to the properties of Spin
• Leptons comprise three families with individual conserved lepton family numbers: L
e, L
, and L
.
• L
e, L
, and L
conserved in all known processes!
• Q conserved in all known processes!
• So I
3also conserved. Picture with different
family members differentiated by isospin property.
• “Weak charge” of leptons correlated with I .
N
Isospin and Baryon Number of Hadrons
So far, we have proton, neutron, and pions.
The proton and neutron obviously related.
3 2
3
particle mass(MeV/c ) 938.3
1/2 1 939.6 2
1/2 Q I
I
p
n B
• The free neutron is not stable, but decays to proton (and e and ) by Weak Interaction.
• The free proton is stable!!! (>10
33years)
• Baryon number is conserved!
N
Isospin in Nuclei It works!
3
3
1 1
( ) ( )( )
2 2
1 1
2 2
( ) QED
I Z A Z
Q Z
Q I Z Z A A
A nucleus consists of Z protons, each with I
3=+1/2, and (A-Z) neutrons, each with I
3=-1/2.
Does this relation work?
3 1
Q I 2 B
Collision of 300 GeV proton with stationary
nucleon
28 ?
0p p p p
New kinds of particles made out of kinetic energy: mesons (pions) with mass of 140 MeV each.
These particles made prolifically, by the Strong Interactions.
Clearly they are not nucleons.
But they are hadrons!
0
And then the
-16with lifetime of ~10 sec
It works!!!
Isospin for Pions…Works?
+ 0 -
3
Three states:
3 states, so 1 (2 1) 3
Since 0 for pions, then we should have
I I
B
Q I
Lifetimes Important
Particles decay when they can !
(That is, the decay is not forbidden!) The lifetime gets shorter (or decay rate gets larger) with increase of either
• energy release
• strength of the responsible force
2 /
mc
The uncertainty principle requires that
the mass of the particle be uncertain by
How Uncertain are particle masses?
2
c 2 10 Mev-cm
11mc c c
proton neutron
0???????
Mass (MeV)
Decay Force
Lifetm
(sec)
c
(cm)
Mass Uncert.
p 938 None 0 MeV
n 940 Weak 890 2.6 1013 7.7 10-25
140 Weak 2.6 10-8 780 2.6 10-14
0 135 EM 8.4 10-17 2.5 10-6 8.0 10-6 .33 10-23 1.0 10-13 200 MeV