3
4
5
6
6-8
10
REFRENCES
DOMAINS
GOALS
BSC APPROACH
MISSION AND
OPPORTUNITY
THE CHALLENGE
2
BACKGROUND
AND OVERVIEW
JULY 2013
COLLABORATIVE GOALS
FRAMEWORK
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
5, 6, 7, 8 3 1, 2
4
THREE PRONGED APPROACH
Bronfenbrenner
and Vytogsky
have long
programs.
Educational theorists such as
Equity in early childhood programs is
connected to the growing diversity in our
communities and early childhood
DCDEE recognized the need for culturally
and linguistically responsive care and
education to be infused with quality
standards, services, and accountability for
effective early childhood services for
families and positive outcomes for all
children. The implementation of a three
pronged strategy will be used to improve
the cultural competence of the early
childhood workforce — including culturally
responsive program policies, teaching
practices, and family engagement.
Phase One
: Development of the Cultural
Competence Breakthrough Series
Collaborative Leadership Team, Expert
Panel, Curriculum development and
Learning Team preparation.
Phase Two:
Recruitment and orientation
of Learning Teams, implementation of
learning sessions and action periods.
Phase Three:
Training and practicum for
technical assistance providers, support via
online formats, and final documentation
and evaluation of the Curriculum and
project.
“Cultural conditioning is how
learning provided by a cultural
and/or social group fits a
growing child to assure its
survival.” -- David Hoopes and
Margaret Pusch
COLLABORATIVE GOALS
FRAMEWORK
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
championed the importance of children’s
cultural contexts for their later outcomes.
Empirical research is growing, moving
beyond deficit models, and recognizing
the importance of culture in child and
family success.
In response, the
North Carolina Division of Child
Development and Early Education
(DCDEE) is invested in the cultural
competence of the early childhood
workforce, systems, and policies that
support the success of all children and
families. With support from the Race to
the Top Early Learning Challenge Fund,
the Winston-Salem State University
Cultural Competence Breakthrough Series
Collaborative was intentionally developed
to build, integrate, and sustain cultural
competence within North Carolina’s early
childhood system. System levels of
practice and policy include classroom
teaching, family engagement,
organizational leadership, technical
assistance, continuing education/
professional development, and local and
state policies and regulations.
13
10 8
10
responsibility of everyone in the organization”
O
rganizations should seek not to
merely focus on differences, but to build inclusiveness around a shared set of values
and beliefs articulated in the organization’s mission and position statements,
strategic plan, and other documents and practices.
implications for later learning.
To optimize the benefits of early brain development and
learning, early childhood programs must align with culturally competent practices in
order to yield the greatest positive impact among all children, particularly those from
diverse backgrounds. The National Association for the Education of Young Children
states that
"
[f]or optimal development and learning of all children, educators must accept
the legitimacy of children’s home language, respect (hold in high regard) the home
culture, and promote and encourage the active involvement and support of all families,
including extended and non traditional family units
.”
12population.
These scores reflect a socio-political history of education policy and practice
that has excluded diverse and minority representation, marginalizing children and families
of diverse backgrounds.
11socioeconomics.
These gaps are evident in later school and life success. In North
Carolina, 84% of Black, 80% of Hispanic or Latino, and 90% of American Indian children in
the fourth grade score below proficiency in reading compared to 55% of the White
3% Asian or Pacific Islander, and 14% Hispanic or Latino
.9Furthermore, 14% of families in
North Carolina speak a language other than English in their home. An average of 26% of
North Carolinian children live in poverty, varying by county from 14% to 44%. During the
early childhood years gaps are identified in social and cognitive development by
THE CHALLENGE
In order to achieve positive outcomes for all children, organizations must “move
beyond merely valuing diversity to building an inclusive, high-performing
organization. In the process, diversity ceases to be merely a human resource initiative
and becomes a fundamental competency: Diversity and inclusiveness become the
COLLABORATIVE GOALS
FRAMEWORK
North Carolina serves an increasingly diverse group of children in our early childhood
programs and schools. The child population is 57% White, 25% Black, 1% American Indian,
Children from diverse backgrounds — including children of color, children of lower socio-economics, and children of oppressed groups — continue to be cared for and educated in early learning environments that are not providing the diversity of experiences that reflect their cultural backgrounds, which includes family values and learning styles. This can result in compromised benefit from participation in early childhood programs with significant
The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And
because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change
until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds.
- R.D. Laing
The mission of the Winston-Salem State University (WSSU) Cultural
Competence Breakthrough Series Collaborative (BSC) is to increase the
cultural and linguistic competence of early childhood professionals in
order to provide culturally and linguistically responsive family
engagement, teaching, and assessments, in addition to promoting
culturally and linguistically responsive programs and state policies.
The development of cultural and linguistic
competence is a process that entails a
building block approach of developing
awareness, knowledge, sensitivity and
competence within an environment that
acknowledges and commits to the reality that
it is essential to equity and quality of care.
Moreover, it requires engagement of all
stakeholders in order for programs and
policies to be considered and planned
through the lens of data, information and
knowledge of individuals, families, groups of
people, and communities. Current efforts to
positively change the quality of early
childhood care and education, including
support from the Race to the Top Early
Learning Challenge Fund, have created an
opportunity to improve cultural competence
and engage stakeholders in the process. The
WSSU Cultural Competence Breakthrough
Series Collaborative project will develop a
curriculum and process utilizing a
participatory action training approach.
Moreover, the project aims to develop and
implement policies that facilitate culturally
competent organizations to strengthen the
ability of teachers, early childhood programs,
and agencies to offer high quality, culturally
and linguistically responsive teaching and
family engagement.
A Breakthrough Series
Collaborative is an evidence
based methodology for change
developed by the Institute for
Healthcare Improvement. This
quality improvement
methodology has been
implemented worldwide and
recently piloted with the North
Carolina early childhood
workforce in 2010- 2011. It
was found to be an effective
approach that promoted greater
cultural competence and
capacity to make improvements
in early childhood programs.
14THE OPPORTUNITY
COLLABORATIVE GOALS
FRAMEWORK
The Breakthrough Series
Collaborative (BSC) is an effective
approach to implement and spread
positive change and improvement
across services. It includes:
Extensive training to build awareness,
knowledge, sensitivity and
competence.
Collaborative teams (teachers,
administrators, technical assistance
providers, and families) working with
coaches to become skilled at the BSC
methodology, to set specific goals and
test improvements.
Use of Small Tests of Change (STOC)
to build evidence to implement and
spread improvements in teaching
practice and program policies.
Technological support to promote
on-going learning and sharing.
The Collaborative Goals
Framework (CGF) for the WSSU
Cultural Competences
Breakthrough Series Collaborative
was developed from existing
evidence and stakeholder
experiences. It will serve as a
guiding document for the
implementation of the WSSU
Cultural Competence BSC. It will
facilitate the implementation of
tested and successful ways to
change, develop, and monitor
early care and education programs
in North Carolina. The work of the
WSSU Cultural Competence BSC
will be supported with
opportunities for ongoing access
to information, skills, practice,
coaching and accountability to
support positive change and
improved outcomes.
COLLABORATIVE GOALS
FRAMEWORK
THE BREAKTHROUGH SERIES
COLLABORATIVE APPROACH
COLLABORATIVE GOALS
FRAMEWORK
•
•
•
•
1.
2.
3.
4.
G
O
A
L
S
Engage families, children, and communities to accurately learn about, be informed
by and respond to the social and cultural backgrounds of children and families.
Commit to ongoing reflection and action about cultural differences that affect
attitudes, beliefs, methods and practice in the classroom and administration of the
early childhood program.
Develop organizational capacity and
commitment to value culture in ways that
transform policies, practices, and teaching
to ensure the ability to function as cultural
and linguistically competent
organizations.
Demonstrate awareness of how cultural groups and communities nurture
a growing child to ensure his/her survival and optimal development by
continuously creating responsive classroom and teaching practices that
support every child’s success.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Family and Community
Engagement
Program and System
Policies
Professional Development
and Technical Assistance
Teaching and Classroom
Practices
Participating Teams will achieve the WSSU Cultural Competence Break- through Series
Collaborative goals by testing, implementing and sustaining improvements in four
domain areas. Within each of the four domains listed below there are specific
objectives to provide more detailed guidance to focus improvement efforts and achieve
our mission.
DOMAINS
COLLABORATIVE GOALS
FRAMEWORK
A
B
C
D
E
F
Teachers work collaboratively with families to honor, support, maintain, and preserve
the home language learning process within the classroom.
Teachers actively engage children's families and communities in the early childhood
setting, including curriculum planning and the learning environment.
Classroom practices reflect on-going communication and learning between program
staff and families.
Teachers participate in on-going professional development and technical assistance to
learn about effective ways to engage culturally and linguistically diverse families.
Teachers advocate for resources, policies, and practices needed to provide culturally
and linguistically responsive environments and promote engagement with all families
and communities.
Program practices and policies reflect collective in put from families, administrators,
and teachers in all program areas.
DOMAIN 2: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE
Programs offer on-going professional development that strengthens the cultural competence of all staff by focusing on self-awareness, sensitivity, knowledge, culturally and linguistically responsive educational practices and advocacy for educational equity.
Cultural competence is integrated into all content areas of professional development and technical assistance offered or accessed by the program.
Professional development and technical assistance uses evidence based models to achieve cultural competency readiness.
Professional Development Plans for all staff include observation based evaluations of teachers and administrators of teachers that focus on implementation of culturally responsive practices and policies.
Learning communities are developed for program staff and families to support on-going learning and implementation of cultural and linguistic diversity in order to improve and enhance programs and policies.
Program leaders promote and support a learning community that includes coaching, feedback and engagement to create and maintain culturally responsive services and programs.
Program leaders engage in professional development that strengthens self-awareness and the ability to create, implement, and evaluate culturally responsive program policies and practices.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
A
B
C
D
E
F
Programs respect, value, and respond to the cultural diversity of all children, families, and program personnel in all practices and policies.
DOMAIN 4: PROGRAM AND SYSTEM POLICIES
Programs advocate for local, state, and federal policies that support the ability of early
childhood programs to offer high quality, culturally responsive early care and education for all children.
Program decision making practices balance power and reflect collective, equitable input from administration, staff, and families.
Programs recruit and support early childhood educators who reflect the cultural and linguistic diversity of the children they serve, to the greatest extent possible.
Programs have a cultural competence plan that includes ongoing assessments that accurately captures the cultural responsiveness of the program and leads to the development of a comprehensive plan.
Programs collaborate with staff, families, and community members, who reflect the diversity of the children and families served, to identify, implement, and evaluate culturally responsive policies and practices.
Teachers acknowledge, respect and respond to the cultural diversity of all children and families, including their home cultures and communities.
Teachers provide culturally relevant opportunities for children to demonstrate their knowledge and development while recognizing their capabilities may be displayed in diverse ways.
Teachers ensure cultural traditions and history of all children and their families are positively evidenced and authentically represented through the learning environment, including interactions and activities.
Teachers integrate knowledge of children, their families, and their community culture into specific practices, educational approaches, and assessments.
Teachers demonstrate the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and beliefs to develop and modify teaching strategies for young children of all cultural backgrounds.
Teachers engage in on-going professional development and technical assistance opportunities that include mentoring, coaching, and reflective supervision to implement developmentally appropriate and culturally competent practices.
A
B
C
D
E
F
Glossary of Terms
Culture refers to the integrated pattern of human behavior that includes thoughts, communications, actions, customs, beliefs, values,
and institutions of racial, ethnic, religious, or social group. It also refers to the “ideations, symbols behaviors — values, and beliefs that are shared by a human group” (Banks & Banks, 2001, p. 428). All individuals have a cul- ture. “Culture is not a static
phenomenon. It is sustained, challenged, or modified over time.” (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000, p. 69). “Central to greater understanding [of culture] is the need to identify the diverse and frequently overlapping ele- ments of ethnicity, which include national origin, race, minority status, language, and religion. Ethnicity can be an amalgam of any or all of these . . .” (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000, p. 63). In addition, it is important to recognize that culture is a continuum and even though one might self-identify as part of a particular culture, he/she may not ascribe to all of the practices and beliefs of that culture (Olsen, Bhattacharya and Scharf, 2006).
Cultural competence is “The integration and transformation of knowledge, information, and data about individuals and groups
of people into compatible and specific standards, skills, service approaches, techniques, and programs that match the individual’s culture and increase the quality and appropriateness of care and outcomes” (King Davis, 1997)
Culturally Competent Individuals have the capacity to function effectively within the context of the cultural beliefs, behaviors,
and needs presented by children, families and their communities. (Adapted from Cross,1989).
Linguistic Competence is the capacity of an organization and its personnel to communicate effectively, and convey information
in a manner that is easily understood by diverse audiences including persons of limited English proficiency, those who have low literacy skills or are not literate, individuals with disabilities, and those who are deaf or hard of hearing. Linguistic competency requires organizational and provider capacity to respond effectively to the health and mental health literacy needs of
populations served. The organization must have policy, structures, practices, procedures, and dedicated resources to support this capacity (Goode & Jones, modified 2009, National Center). National Center for Cultural Competence, Georgetown University Center for Child & Human Development.
Facilitation/Training: Provides early childhood content and application to groups through teaching/learning sessions that
include presentations, seminars, structured discussions, reflective dialog and other group methods. Individuals providing training need core knowledge of child development and the ability to translate this knowledge into practice. In addition, they need to understand adult learning and group dynamics and be able to facilitate the learning process, information exchange and participant skill development in a group setting.
Culturally Competetent Facilitation/Training requires the trainers to have a strong knowledge of the relationship between
learning and culture. This means they will use and fuse multiple presentation styles, group process skills and assessment of learning. They will need to understand and apply a variety of communication styles and group interaction dynamics. A culturally competent trainer is aware of her/his own individual and cultural learning style and is able to transcend this in order to meet the learning needs of the group.
Professional Development Plan: NAEYC and NACCRRA define an individual professional development as, “documents that
provide a framework connecting various professional development experiences to each other and to the common core of knowledge and professional standards for early education professionals. Individual professional development plans are designed to create holistic approach to building an early childhood professional’s capacities and to ensure that individuals remain current regarding knowledge and practices in the field.” More information about individual professional development plans may be accessed at http://naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/ecprofessional/ NAEYC_NACCRRA_TrainingTAGlossary.pdf
The North Caroline PreK utilizes a professional development plan available on the NC Division of Child Development and Early Education Website: http://ncchildcare.dhhs.state.nc.us/general/mb_ncprek_detail_20111209.asp
The North Carolina Institute for Child Development Professionals also provides examples of professional development plans on
COLLABORATIVE GOALS
FRAMEWORK
References
Banks, J.A., and C.A. Banks, eds. (2001). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives, 4th edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Delpit, Lisa. (1995). Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. NY: New Press.
Gay, G. 2000. Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. http://www.ihi.org/ihi
Ladson-Billings, G. (2003). "New Directions in Multicultural Education: Complexities, Boundaries, and Critical Race Theory," in James A. Banks and Cherry A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, Second Edition (p. 50-65). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Olsen, Bhattacharya and Scharf, 2006. Cultural Competency: What It Is and Why It Matters. Brief, Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health. National Association for the Education of Young Children, (2010). Pathways to Cultural Competence Project.
Bibliography
1
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. R. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern per- spectives. London: Falmer Press.
2
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2000). From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development. Jack P. Shonkoff and Deborah A. Phillips, eds. Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
3
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4
Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (original work published in 1934).
5
Garcia Coll, C., Akerman, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). Cultural influences on developmental processes and outcomes:Implications for the study of development and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 333—274.
6
Garcia, E. & Frede, E. (2010). Young English language learners: current research and emerging directions for practiceand policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
8
Britto, P.R., Engle, P.E., & Super, C.S., (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of Early Child Development Research and Its Impact on Global Policy.
New York: Oxford University Press.
9
Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2013. Kids Count Report. Accessed from http://datacenter.kidcount.org
10
Heckman, J. The Case for Investing in Disadvantaged Young Children. Accessed on April 13, 2013 from http:// www.heckmanequation.org/content/ resource/case-investing-disadvantaged-young-children
11
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35, 3-12.
12
National Association for the Education of Young Children, (1995). Responding to Linguistic and Cultural Diversity; Recommendations for Effective Early Childhood Education. Position Statement.
13
Norris,D.M.,and M.C.J.Fignolé Lofton.(1995). Winning with diversity: A practical handbook for creating inclusive meetings, events, and organizations. Washington, DC: American Society of Association Executives Foundation
14
Langan, H., McMillan, V., Glover, S. and Vardell, R. ( 2012). Developing a Framework for Culturally Responsive Early Childhood Curricula and Public Policies: A Collaborative Learning Community. Unpublished Report for NC Division of Child Development and Early Education.
7
Zepeda, M., Castro, D. C., & Cronin, S. (2011). Preparing early childhood teachers to work with young dual languagelearners. Child Development Perspectives, 5(1), 10-14.