• No results found

On Henstock Stieltjes Integrals of Interval Valued Functions and Fuzzy Number Valued Functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "On Henstock Stieltjes Integrals of Interval Valued Functions and Fuzzy Number Valued Functions"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2016.44088

How to cite this paper: Hamid, M.E. and Elmuiz, A.H. (2016) On Henstock-Stieltjes Integrals of Interval-Valued Functions and Fuzzy-Number-Valued Functions. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 4, 779-786.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2016.44088

On Henstock-Stieltjes Integrals

of Interval-Valued Functions and

Fuzzy-Number-Valued Functions

Muawya Elsheikh Hamid

1*

, Alshaikh Hamed Elmuiz

2

1School of Management, Ahfad University for Women, Omdurman, Sudan

2Deanship of Preparatory Year, College of Science and Arts, Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Received 2 March 2016; accepted 24 April 2016; published 28 April 2016 Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

In this paper we introduce the notion of the Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integrals of interval-valued functions and fuzzy-number-valued functions and discuss some of their properties.

Keywords

Fuzzy Numbers, Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) Integrals of Interval-Valued Functions, Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) Integrals of Fuzzy-Number-Valued Functions

1. Introduction

As it is well known, the Henstock (H) integral for a real function was first defined by Henstock [1] in 1963. The Henstock (H) integral is a lot powerful and easier than the Lebesgue, Wiener and Richard Phillips Feynman integrals. Furthermore, it is also equal to the Denjoy and the Perron integrals [1] [2]. In 2000, Congxin Wu and Zengtai Gong [3] introduced the notion of the Henstock (H) integrals of interval-valued functions and fuzzy- number-valued functions and obtained a number of their properties. In 2016, Yoon [4] introduced the interval- valued Henstock-Stieltjes integral on time scales and investigated some properties of these integrals. In 1998, Lim et al. [5] introduced the notion of the Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integral of real-valued function which was a generalization of the Henstock (H) integral and obtained its properties.

In this paper, we tend to introduce the notion of the Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integrals of interval-valued functions and fuzzy-number-valued functions and discuss some of their properties.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section two, we tend to give the preliminary terminology used in the

(2)

present paper. Section three is dedicated to discussing the Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integral of interval-valued functions. In Section four, we tend to introduce the Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integral of fuzzy-number-valued functions. The last section provides conclusions.

2. Preliminaries

Definition 2.1 [1] [2] Let

δ

:

[ ]

a b, →R+ be a positive real-valued function.

{

[

1

]

}

1

, ; n

i i i i

P= x x

ξ

= is called a δ- fine division, if the subsequent conditions are satisfied:

1) a=x0 <x1<x2 <<xn =b,

2) ξi

[

xi−1,xi

]

(

ξ δ ξ ξ δ ξi

( )

i , i+

( )

i

)

(

i=1, 2,,n

)

.

For brevity, we write P=

{

[ ]

u v, ;ξ

}

, wherever

[ ]

u v, denotes a typical interval in P and ξ is that the associated point of

[ ]

u v, .

Definition 2.2 [1] [2] A real-valued function f t

( )

is called Henstock (H) integrable to A on

[ ]

a b, if for each

ε >

0

, there exists a function

δ

( )

t >0 such that for any δ-fine division

{

[

]

}

1

, ; n

i i i i

P= u v

ξ

= of

[ ]

a b, , we have

( )(

)

1

. n

i i i

i

f ξ v u A ε

=

− − <

(1)

where the sum

is understood to be over P, we write

( ) ( )

d b

a

H

f t t=A, and fH a b

[ ]

, .

Definition 2.3 [5] Let

α

:

[ ]

a b, →R be an increasing function. A real-valued function f :

[ ]

a b, →R is Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integrable to IR with respect to α on

[ ]

a b, if for each

ε >

0

, there exists a function

δ

( )

t >0, such that for any δ-fine division

{

[

]

}

1

, ; n

i i i i

P= u v

ξ

= we have

( ) ( )

( )

1

. n

i i i

i

f ξ α v α u I ε

=

 − − <

 

(2)

We write

( ) ( )

d b

a

HS

f t α=I, and fHSα

[ ]

a b, .

Lemma 2.1 [5] Let

α

:

[ ]

a b, →R be an increasing function and let f, g are Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integrable with respect to α on

[ ]

a b, . If

α

C a b1

[ ]

, and fg almost everywhere on

[ ]

a b, , then

d d .

b b

a a

f α≤ g α

(3)

3. The Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) Integrals of Interval-Valued Functions

Definition 3.1 [3] Let IR=

{

I = I−,I+: is the closed bounded interval on the real line I R

}

.

For A B, ∈IR, we define AB if and only if A B

and A+ B+,

A

+ =

B

C

if and only if

C−=A−+B− and C+=A++B+, and A B⋅ =

{

a b a⋅ : ∈A b, ∈B

}

, wherever

(

A B

)

−=min

{

A−⋅B−,A−⋅B+,A+⋅B−,A+⋅B+

}

and

(

A B

)

+=max

{

A−⋅B−,A−⋅B+,A+⋅B−,A+⋅B+

}

. Define d A B

(

,

)

=max

(

A−−B−,A+−B+

)

as the distance between intervals A and B.

Definition 3.2 [3] Let F:

[ ]

a b, →IR be an interval-valued function. I0∈IR, for each

ε >

0

there exists

a

δ

( )

t >0 such that for any δ-fine division

{

[

]

}

1

, ; n

i i i i

P= u v

ξ

= we have

( )(

)

0 1

, ,

n

i i i

i

d F ξ v u I ε

=

<

 

 (4)

then F t

( )

is called the Henstock (H) integrable over

[ ]

a b, and write

( ) ( )

d 0 b

a

IH

F t t=I . Also, we write

( )

[ ]

,

(3)

Definition 3.3 Let

α

:

[ ]

a b, →R be an increasing function. An interval-valued function F:

[ ]

a b, →IR is

Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integrable to I0IR with respect to α on

[ ]

a b, , if for each

ε

>

0

there exists a

( )

t 0

δ

> such that for any δ- fine division

{

[

]

}

1

, ; n

i i i i

P= u v

ξ

= , we have

( ) ( )

( )

0 1

, .

n

i i i

i

d F ξ α v α u I ε

=

<

   

 (5)

We write

(

) ( )

d 0 b

a

IHS

F t α=I and F t

( )

IHSα

[ ]

a b, .

Theorem 3.1 Let

α

:

[ ]

a b, →R be an increasing function. If F t

( )

IHSα

[ ]

a b, , then there exists a unique integral value.

Proof Let the integral value is not unique and let 1

(

) ( )

d b

a

A = IHS

F t α and 2

(

) ( )

d b

a

A = IHS

F t α. If

ε >

0

is given. Then there exists a

δ

( )

t >0 such that for any δ- fine division

{

[

]

}

1

, ; n

i i i i

P= u v

ξ

= , we have

( ) ( )

( )

1 1

, ,

2 n

i i i

i

d F ξ α v α u A ε

=

<

   

 (6)

( ) ( )

( )

2 1

, 2 n

i i i

i

d F ξ α v α u A ε

=

<

   

 (7)

(

1 2

)

( ) ( )

( )

1

( ) ( )

( )

2

1 1

, , ,

.

2 2

n n

i i i i i i

i i

d A A d F ξ α v α u A d F ξ α v α u A

ε ε ε

= =

 

= +

   

< + =

Since for all

ε

>0, there exists a

δ

( )

t >0 as above then A1=A2. 

Theorem 3.2 Let

α

:

[ ]

a b, →R be an increasing function. Then an interval-valued function

( )

[ ]

,

F tIHSα a b iff F

( )

t ,F+

( )

tHSα

[ ]

a b, and

(

) ( )

d

( )

( )

d ,

( )

( )

d .

b b b

a a a

IHS F t α=  HS Ft α HS F+ t α

 

(8)

Proof If F t

( )

IHSα

[ ]

a b, , by Definition 3.3 there exists a unique interval number I0 = I0−,I0+ with the

property, for any

ε >

0

there exists a

δ

( )

t >0 such that for any δ- fine division

{

[

]

}

1

, ; n

i i i i

P= u v

ξ

= , we have

( ) ( )

( )

0 1

, ,

n

i i i

i

d F ξ α v α u I ε

=

<

   

 (9)

that is

( ) ( )

( )

0

( ) ( )

( )

0

1 1

max , .

n n

i i i i i i

i i

F

ξ α

v

α

u I F

ξ α

v

α

u I

ε

− +

− +

= =

−  −  − <

(10)

Since

α

( )

vi

α

( )

ui ≥0 for 1≤ ≤i n, we have

( ) ( )

( )

0 1

, n

i i i

i

F− ξ α v α u I− ε

=

 − − <

 

(11)

( ) ( )

( )

0 1

. n

i i i

i

F+ ξ α v α u I+ ε

=

 − − <

 

(4)

Therefore, by Definition 2.3 we can obtain F

( )

t ,F+

( )

tHSα

[ ]

a b, and

( )

( )

0 d ,

b

a

I− = HS

Ft α (13)

( )

( )

0 d .

b

a

I+ = HS

F+ t α (14) Conversely, let F

( )

tHSα

[ ]

a b, , then there exists a unique H1R with the property, given

ε >

0

there exists a

δ

1

( )

t >0 such that for any

δ

1-fine division

{

[

,

]

;

}

1 n i i i i

P= u v

ξ

= , we have

( ) ( )

( )

1 1

. n

i i i

i

F− ξ α v α u H ε

=

 − − <

 

(15)

It is similar to find

δ

2

( )

t >0 such that for any

δ

2-fine division

{

[

,

]

;

}

1 n i i i i

P= u v

ξ

= , we have

( ) ( )

( )

2 1

. n

i i i

i

F+ ξ α v α u H ε

=

 − − <

 

(16)

If F

( )

tF+

( )

t , then H1H2. We define δ

( )

t =min

(

δ1

( ) ( )

t2 t

)

and I0 =

[

H H1, 2

]

, then for any δ- fine division

{

[

]

}

1

, ; n

i i i i

P= u v

ξ

= , we have

( ) ( )

( )

0 1

, .

n

i i i

i

d F ξ α v α u I ε

=

<

   

 (17)

Hence F:

[ ]

a b, →IR is Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integrable with respect to α on

[ ]

a b, . 

Theorem 3.3 If F G, ∈IHSα

[ ]

a b, and β γ, ∈R. Then

i)

β

F+

γ

GIHSα

[ ]

a b, and

(

) (

)

d

(

)

(

)

d .

b b b

a a a

IHS

βFG α β= IHS

Fdα γ+ IHS

G α (18) ii) Let F t

( )

=G t

( )

almost everywhere on

[ ]

a b, . Then

(

) ( )

d

(

) ( )

d .

b b

a a

IHS

F t α= IHS

G t α (19)

Proof i) If F G, ∈IHSα

[ ]

a b, , then F−,F+,G G−, +∈HS a b

[ ]

, by Theorem 3.2. Hence

[ ]

, , , , .

F G F G F G F G HSα a b

β

+

γ

β

+

γ

+

β

++

γ

β

++

γ

+

1) If β >0 and γ >0, then

( ) (

)

( )

(

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

d d

d d

d d

d d .

b b

a a

b b

a a

b b

a a

b b

a a

HS F G HS F G

HS F HS G

IHS F IHS G

IHS F IHS G

β γ α β γ α

β α γ α

β α γ α

β α γ α

− − −

− −

− −

+ = +

= +

   

= +

   

 

= +

 

(5)

( ) (

)

( )

(

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

d d

d d

d d

d d .

b b

a a

b b

a a

b b

a a

b b

a a

HS F G HS F G

HS F HS G

IHS F IHS G

IHS F IHS G

β γ α β γ α

β α γ α

β α γ α

β α γ α

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ = +

= +

   

= +

   

 

= +

 

3) If β >0 and γ <0, (or β <0 and γ >0), then

( ) (

)

( )

(

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

d d

d d

d d

d d .

b b

a a

b b

a a

b b

a a

b b

a a

HS F G HS F G

HS F HS G

IHS F IHS G

IHS F IHS G

β γ α β γ α

β α γ α

β α γ α

β α γ α

− − +

− +

− +

+ = +

= +

   

= +

   

 

= +

 

Similarly, for four cases above we have

( ) (

)

d

(

)

d

(

)

d .

b b b

a a a

HS βF γG α β IHS F α γ IHS G α

+

+  

+ = +

 

(20)

Hence by Theorem 3.2

β

F+

γ

GIHSα

[ ]

a b, and

(

) (

)

d

(

)

d

(

)

d .

b b b

a a a

IHS

βFG α β= IHS

F α γ+ IHS

G α (21) ii) The proof is similar to Theorem 2.8 in [5]. 

Theorem 3.4 Let FIHSα

[ ]

a c, and let FIHSα

[ ]

c b, . Then FIHSα

[ ]

a b, and

(

) ( )

d

(

) ( )

d

(

) ( )

d .

b c b

a a c

IHS

F t α = IHS

F t α+ IHS

F t α (22)

Proof If FIHSα

[ ]

a c, and FIHSα

[ ]

c b, , then by Theorem 3.2 F−,F+∈HSα

[ ]

a c, and

[ ]

, ,

FF+∈HSα c b . Hence F−,F+∈HSα

[ ]

a b, and

( )

( )

( )

(

)

(

)

d d d

d .

b c b

a a c

c b

a c

HS F HS F HS F

IHS Fd IHS F

α α α

α α

− − −

= +

 

= +

 

Similarly,

( )

d

(

)

d

(

)

d .

b c b

a a c

HS F α IHS F α IHS F α

+

+ =+

 

 

Hence by Theorem 3.2 FIHSα

[ ]

a b, and

(

)

d

(

)

d

(

)

d .

b c b

a a c

(6)

Theorem 3.5 Let

α

:

[ ]

a b, →R be an increasing function such that α ∈C1

(

[ ]

a b,

)

. If F t

( )

G t

( )

nearly everywhere on

[ ]

a b, and F G, ∈IHSα

[ ]

a b, , then

(

) ( )

d

(

) ( )

d .

b b

a a

IHS

F t α ≤ IHS

G t α (24)

Proof Let F t

( )

G t

( )

nearly everywhere on

[ ]

a b, and F G, ∈IHSα

[ ]

a b, . Then

[ ]

, , , ,

FF+ G G− +∈HSα a b and F−≤G−, F+≤G+ nearly everywhere on

[ ]

a b, . By Lemma 2.1

( )

( )

d

( )

( )

d

b b

a a

HS

Ft α≤ HS

Gt α and

( )

( )

d

( )

( )

d .

b b

a a

HS

F+ t α ≤ HS

G+ t α Hence

(

) ( )

d

(

) ( )

d ,

b b

a a

IHS

F t α ≤ IHS

G t α (25) by Theorem 3.2. 

Theorem 3.6 Let F G, ∈IHSα

[ ]

a b, and d F G

(

,

)

is Lebesgue-Stieltjes (LS) integrable on

[ ]

a b, . Then

(

)

d ,

(

)

d

( ) (

,

)

d .

b b b

a a a

d IHS F α IHS G αLS d F G α

(26)

Proof By definition of distance,

(

)

(

)

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

(

)

( )

(

)

( )

( )

( )

(

)

( )

d , d

max d , d d

max d , d

max d , d

max , d

b b

a a

b b b b

a a a a

b b

a a

b b

a a

b

a

b

a

d IHS F IHS G

HS Fd HS G HS F HS G

HS F G HS F G

LS F G LS F G

LS F G F G

LS

α α

α α α α

α α

α α

α

− − + +

− − + +

− − + +

− − + +

 

 

 

 

=

 

 

=  − − 

 

 

− −

 

≤ − −

=

(

,

)

d .

d F G α

(27)

4. The Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) Integral of Fuzzy-Number-Valued Functions

Definition 4.1 [6]-[8] If A∈F

( )

R is a fuzzy subset on R. If for any

λ

[ ]

0,1 , Aλ = A Aλ−, λ+ and

1 ,

A

φ

wherever Aλ =

{

t A t:

( )

≥λ

}

, then A is called a fuzzy number. If A satisfy the following

conditions: 1) convex, 2) normal, 3) upper semi-continuous, 4) has the compact support, then A is called a compact fuzzy number.

Let R denote the set of all fuzzy numbers and RC denote the set of all compact fuzzy numbers.

Definition 4.2 [6] Let A B  , ∈R, we define A ≤B if and only if Aλ ≤Bλ for all

λ

(

0,1 ,

]

A+ =BC if

and only if Aλ +Bλ =Cλ for any

λ

(

0,1 ,

]

A B  ⋅ =D if and only if AλBλ =Dλ for any

λ

(

0,1 .

]

For , C,

A B  ∈R

( )

[ ]0,1

(

)

, sup ,

D A B d A Bλ λ

λ∈ =

  is called the distance between A and B.

Lemma 4.1 [9] If a mapping H: 0,1

[ ]

IR,

λ

H

( )

λ

=

[

m nλ, λ

]

, satisfies mλ1,nλ1⊃mλ2,nλ2

(7)

(0,1]

( )

: A H λ λ λ ∈ = ∈

R (28)

and

( )

1 , n n

Aλ H λ

=

=

(29)

where

(

1

)

1 .

1 n

n λ = − λ

+  

Definition 4.3 [3] Let F:

[ ]

a b, →R and let the interval-valued function F tλ

( )

= Fλ

( )

t ,Fλ+

( )

t is Henstock (H) integrable on

[ ]

a b, for any

λ

(

0,1 ,

]

then F t

( )

is called Henstock (H) integrable on

[ ]

a b,

and the integral value is defined by

(

) ( )

( ]

( )

( )

( ]

( )

( )

0,1

0,1

d : d

d , d .

b b

a a

b b

a a

FH F t t IH F t t

H F t H F t

λ λ λ λ λ λ λ ∈ − + ∈ =   =  

We write F t

( )

FH a b

[ ]

, .

Definition 4.4 Let

α

:

[ ]

a b, →R be an increasing function and let F:

[ ]

a b, →R . If the interval-valued function F tλ

( )

= Fλ

( )

t ,Fλ+

( )

t is Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integrable with respect to α on

[ ]

a b, for any

(

0,1 ,

]

λ

then F t

( )

is called Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integrable with respect to α on

[ ]

a b, and the integral value is defined by

(

) ( )

( ]

(

)

( )

( ]

( )

( )

0,1

0,1

d : d

d , d .

b b

a a

b b

a a

FHS F t IHS F t

HS F HS F

λ λ

λ λ

λ

α λ α

λ α α

∈ − + ∈ =   =  

We write F t

( )

FHSα

[ ]

a b, .

Theorem 4.1 F∈FHSα

[ ]

a b, , then

(

) ( )

d

b

a

FHS

F t α ∈R and

(

) ( )

(

)

( )

1

d d ,

n

b b

n

a a

FHS F t IHS Fλ t

λ

α ∞ α

=

 

=

 

 

(30)

where

(

1

)

1 .

1 n

n λ = −λ

+  

Proof Let H: 0,1

(

]

IR, be defined by

( ) ( )

( )

d ,

( )

( )

d .

b b

a a

H λ =  HS Fλt α HS Fλ+ t α

Since Fλ−

( )

t and Fλ+

( )

t are increasing and decreasing on

λ

respectively, therefore, when 0<λ1≤λ2≤1,

we have

( )

( )

1 2 ,

Fλ− tFλ− t Fλ1

( )

t Fλ2

( )

t ,

+ +

on

[ ]

a b, . From Theorem 3.5 we have

( )

1

( )

d ,

( )

1

( )

d

( )

2

( )

d ,

( )

2

( )

d .

b b b b

a a a a

HS Fλ− t α HS Fλ+ t α HS Fλ− t α HS Fλ+ t α

   

   

 

 (31)

From Theorem 3.2 and Lemma 4.1 we have

(

) ( )

(0,1]

( )

( )

d : d , d

b b b

a a a

FHS F t HS Fλ HS Fλ R

λ

α λ − α + α

 

=

 

 (32)

and ∀ ∈ 0,1 ,

λ

(

]

(

) ( )

(

)

( )

1

d d ,

n

b b

n

a a

FHS F t IHS Fλ t

λ

α ∞ α

=

 

=

 

 

wherever

(

)

1

1 .

1 n

n λ = − + λ

(8)

Using Theorem 4.1 and the properties of

(

IHS

)

integral, we are able to get the properties of

(

FHS

)

integral, for example, 1) the linear, 2) monotone, 3) interval additive properties of

(

FHS

)

integral.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we proposed the definition of the Henstock-Stieltjes (HS) integrals of interval-valued functions and fuzzy-number-valued functions and investigated some properties of those integrals.

References

[1] Henstock, R. (1963) Theory of Integration. Butterworth, London.

[2] Lee, P.-Y. (1989) Lanzhou Lectures on Henstock Integration. World Scientific, Singapore. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/0845

[3] Wu, C.X. and Gong, Z.T. (2000) On Henstock Integrals of Interval-Valued Functions and Fuzzy-Valued Functions.

Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115, 377-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00277-2

[4] Yoon, J.H. (2016) On Henstock-Stieltjes Integrals of Interval-Valued Functions On time Scales. Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society, 29, 109-115.

[5] Lim, J.S., Yoon, J. H. and Eun, G. S. (1998) On Henstock Stieltjes Integral. Kangweon-Kyungki Math, 6, 87-96. [6] Nanda, S. (1989) On Integration of Fuzzy Mappings. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 32, 95-101.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(89)90090-0

[7] Wu, C.X. and Ma, M. (1991) Embedding Problem of Fuzzy Number Spaces: Part I. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 44, 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(91)90030-T

[8] Wu, C.X. and Ma, M. (1992) Embedding Problem of Fuzzy Number Spaces: Part II. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 45, 189-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(92)90118-N

References

Related documents

In Stock s Financial instruments Total P1 P2 P3 P4 Firms Govt HH ROW Firms Govt HH ROW Inventories by institutional sectors Total change s in inventories Financia l instrument s

The criminal act is involved, according to Lombroso, in a long process of causes and effects that ends up cancelling the moral responsibility of the offender,

panel where a pap-smear image is loaded and the cytotechnician selects an appropriate method for scene segmentation (based on TWS classifier), debris removal (based on the

1G: First generation; 2G: Second generation; 1G + 2G: Combined first and second generation; B: Bagasse; B + L: Bagasse with leaves addition; BOE: Barrel of oil equivalent; C5:

We have used the EEG technique gives better results of EEG for signal acquisition, ICA for signal enhancement, Kernel Density Function (KDE) in feature extraction and finally

The purpose of the results and discussion section is to describe the perceived impact of competitive collaboration to the senior high school students‘ engagement and

This turns out to be less than a predetermined significance level of .05, which means that there is significant difference in the level of satisfaction of the

Both intratumoural and systemic basic fibroblast growth factor infusion resulted in significant increases in tumour vascularity, blood flow and growth, but not lung metastasis,