• No results found

Majorization problems for p−valently meromorphic functions of complex order

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Majorization problems for p−valently meromorphic functions of complex order"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Research paper

Majorization problems for p−valently meromorphic functions of complex order

involving certain integral operator

T. Janani and G. Murugusundaramoorthy *

School of Advanced Sciences, VIT University, Vellore 632014, Tamilnadu, India

*Corresponding author Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The main object of this paper is to investigate the problem of majorization of certain class of meromorphic p-valent functions of complex order involving certain integral operator. Moreover we point out some new or known conse- quences of our main result.

Keywords: Meromorphic functions, Starlike functions, Convex functions, Majorization problems, Hadamard product (convolution), Integral operator.

2010 AMS Subject Classification:Primary 30C45; Secondary 30C50

1 Introduction

Let f and g are analytic functions in the unit disc ∆ = {z ∈ C : |z| < 1}. Due to MacGregor [8], (also see [7]) we say that f is majorized by g in ∆ and we write

f (z) ¿ g(z), (z ∈ ∆) (1)

if there exists a function φ, analytic in ∆, such that

|φ(z)| < 1 and f (z) = φ(z)g(z), z ∈ ∆. (2)

It may be noted here that (1) is closely related to the concept of quasi-subordination between analytic functions.

Also we say that f is subordinate to g denoted by f ≺ g (see [9]), if there exists a Schwarz function ω which is analytic in ∆ with ω(0) = 0 and |ω(z)| < 1 for all z ∈ ∆, such that

f (z) = g(ω(z)), z ∈ ∆.

We denote this subordination by f ≺ g. Furthermore, if the function g is univalent in ∆, we have f ≺ g ⇐⇒ f (0) = g(0) and f (∆) ⊂ g(∆).

Denote by S(γ) and C(γ) the class of starlike and convex functions of complex order γ(γ ∈ C \ {0}), satisfying the following conditions

f (z)

z 6= 0 and <

µ 1 + 1

γ

·zf0(z) f (z) − 1

¸¶

> 0

(2)

and

f0(z) 6= 0 and <

µ 1 + 1

γ

·zf00(z) f0(z)

¸¶

> 0, (z ∈ ∆) respectively. Further,

S((1 − δ)cosλ e−iλ) = S(δ, λ), |λ| < π

2; 0 ≤ δ ≤ 1 the class of λ− spiral-like function of order δ investigated by Libera [4] and

S(cosλ e−iλ) = S(λ), |λ| < π 2; the class of spiral-like functions introduced by Spacek [10]( also see [11]).

A mojorization problem for the class of analytic starlike functions have been investigated by MacGregor [8] and Altintas et al. [1]. Recently Goyal and Goswami [3] extended these results for the class of meromorphic functions making use of certain integral operator.

Let Σp be the class of p−valently meromorphic functions which are analytic and univalent in the punctured unit disk

= {z ∈ C : 0 < |z| < 1} = ∆ \ {0}

of the form

f (z) = 1 zp +

X n=1

an−pzn−p. (3)

with a simple pole at the origin.

Due to Aqlan et al. [2] (see [5]), we recall the integral operator Jβ,pα for meromorphic functions f ∈ Σp as given below,

Jβ,pα : Σp→ Σp

Jβ,pα f (z) =

µ α + β − 1 β − 1

1

zp+β Zz

0

(1 − t

z)α−1 tβ+p−1f (t) dt (4)

Jβ,pα f (z) =

f (z) α = 0, β > −1, p ∈ N, f ∈ Σp

1

zp+Γ(α+β)Γ(β) P

n=1

Γ(n+β)

Γ(n+α+β)an−pzn−p, α > 0, β > −1, p ∈ N, f ∈ Σp.

(5)

The following relation for Jβ,pα f (z) can be obtained by simple calculation,

z(Jβ,pα f (z))0= (α + β − 1)Jβ,pα−1f (z) − (α + β + p − 1)Jβ,pα f (z). (6) Using (6), the below recurrence relation for Jβ,pα f (z) can be obtained easily,

z(Jβ,pα f (z))(q+1)= (α + β − 1)(Jβ,pα−1f (z))(q)− (α + β + p + q − 1)(Jβ,pα f (z))(q). (7) In the present paper we investigate a majorization problem for the class of p−valently meromorphic starlike functions of complex order associated with the generalized integral operator due to Aqlan [2] and Murugusun- daramoorthy and Magesh [6].

Definition 1.1. A function f (z) ∈ Σp is said to in the class Mp,qα,β(γ, A, B) of meromorphic functions of complex order γ 6= 0 in ∆ if and only if

1 − 1 γ

"

z(Jβ,pα f (z))(q+1)

(Jβ,pα f (z))(q) + p + q

#

1 + Az

1 + Bz, (8)

where z ∈ ∆, p, q ∈ N0= N ∪ {0}, β > −1, α > 0, γ ∈ C \ {0} and −1 ≤ B < A ≤ 1.

(3)

For simplicity, we put

Mp,qα,β(γ, 1, −1) = Mp,qα,β(γ),

where Mp,qα,β(γ) denote the class of functions f ∈ Σp satisfying the following inequality:

<

à 1 − 1

γ

"

z(Jβ,pα f (z))(q+1)

(Jβ,pα f (z))(q) + p + q

#!

> 0 (9)

where z ∈ ∆, p, q ∈ N0= N ∪ {0}, β > −1, α > 0, γ ∈ C \ {0}.

Example 1.2. Putting γ = (p − δ)cosλ e−iλ, |λ| < π2; 0 ≤ δ < p the class Mp,qα,β(γ) = Mp,qα,β((p − δ)cosλ e−iλ) ≡ Mp,qα,β(δ, λ) called the generalized class of λ−spiral-like functions of order δ(0 ≤ δ < p) if

<

à e

"

z(Jβ,pα f (z))(q+1) (Jβ,pα f (z))(q) + q

#!

< −δ cosλ (10)

where z ∈ ∆, p, q ∈ N0= N ∪ {0}, β > −1, α > 0, γ ∈ C \ {0}.

Example 1.3. Putting γ = (p − δ); 0 ≤ δ < p the class Mp,qα,β(p − δ) ≡ Mp,qα,β(δ), the generalized class of p−valently meromorphic starlike functions of order δ(0 ≤ δ < p) if

<

Ãz(Jβ,pα f (z))(q+1) (Jβ,pα f (z))(q) + q

!

< −δ (11)

where z ∈ ∆, p, q ∈ N0= N ∪ {0}, β > −1, α > 0, γ ∈ C \ {0}.

Remark 1.4. By taking q = 0 in Example 1.3, Mp,0α,β(p − δ) ≡ Mpα,β(δ) the class of p−valently meromorphic starlike functions of order δ(0 ≤ δ < p) if

<

Ãz(Jβ,pα f (z))0 (Jβ,pα f (z))

!

< −δ

where z ∈ ∆, β > −1, α > 0, γ ∈ C \ {0}.

2 Majorization problem for the class Mp,qα,β(γ, A, B)

Theorem 2.1. Let the function f ∈ Σp and g ∈ Mp,qα,β(γ, A, B) if (Jβ,pα f (z))(q) is majorized by (Jβ,pα g(z))(q) in ∆ then

|(Jβ,pα−1f (z))(q)| ≤ |(Jβ,pα−1g(z))(q)|, |z| ≤ r1, (12)

r1= r1(A, B, α, β, γ, ρ) is the smallest positive root of the equation

|(α + β − 1)B − γ(A − B)| r3− {(α + β − 1) + 2ρ|B| } r2

− {|(α + β − 1)B − γ(A − B)| + 2ρ} r + (α + β − 1) = 0, (13)

where z ∈ ∆, p, q ∈ N0= N ∪ {0}, β > −1, α > 0, γ ∈ C \ {0} and −1 ≤ B < A ≤ 1.

Proof. Since g(z) ∈ Mp,qα,β(γ, A, B), we readily obtain from (8) that, if

1 − 1 γ

"

z(Jβ,pα g(z))(q+1)

(Jβ,pα g(z))(q) + p + q

#

= 1 + Aw(z)

1 + Bw(z) (14)

where w denotes the well known class of bounded analytic functions in ∆ and

w(0) = 0 and |w(z)| ≤ |z|, (z ∈ ∆). (15)

(4)

From (14),we get z(Jβ,pα g(z))(q+1)

(Jβ,pα g(z))(q) = −(p + q) + [(p + q)B + γ(A − B)]w(z)

1 + Bw(z) . (16)

Using (7) in the above equation, we get,

(Jβ,pα g(z))(q)= (α + β − 1)[1 + Bw(z)]

(α + β − 1) + [(α + β − 1)B − γ(A − B)] w(z)(Jβ,pα−1g(z))(q). (17) Hence, by making use of (15), we get,

|(Jβ,pα g(z))(q)| ≤ (α + β − 1)[1 + |B| |z|]

(α + β − 1) − |(α + β − 1)B − γ(A − B)| |z||(Jβ,pα−1g(z))(q)|. (18) Since (Jβ,pα f (z))(q) is majorized by (Jβ,pα g(z))(q) in ∆ from (2), we have

(Jβ,pα f (z))(q)= φ(z)(Jβ,pα g(z))(q)

Differentiating the above equation w.r.t z and multiplying by z, we have, z(Jβ,pα f (z))(q+1)= zφ0(z)(Jβ,pα g(z))(q)+ zφ(z)(Jβ,pα g(z))(q+1).

By using (7), we get, (Jβ,pα−1f (z))(q)= z

α + β − 1φ0(z)(Jβ,pα g(z))(q)+ φ(z)(Jβ,pα−1g(z))(q). (19) Noting that the Schwarz function φ(z) satisfies

0(z)| ≤ 1 − |φ(z)|2

1 − |z|2 (20)

and using (18) and (20) in (19) we have

|(Jβ,pα−1f (z))(q)|

³

|φ(z)| +(1−|φ(z)|(1−|z|2)2)· |z| (1+|B| |z|)

(α+β−1)−|(α+β−1)B−γ(A−B)| |z|

´

|(Jβ,pα−1g(z))(q)| which upon setting

|z| = r and |φ(z)| = ρ, (0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1) leads us to the inequality

|(Jβ,pα−1f (z))(q)| ≤ θ(ρ)

(1 − r2){(α + β − 1) − |(α + β − 1)B − γ(A − B)|r}|(Jβ,pα−1g(z))(q)|, (21) where

θ(ρ) = ρ(1 − r2){ (α + β − 1) − |(α + β − 1)B − γ(A − B)| r} + (1 − ρ2)(1 + |B| r)r takes its maximum value at ρ = 1. Furthermore, if 0 ≤ σ ≤ r1, the function ϕ(ρ) defined by

ϕ(ρ) = ρ(1 − σ2){ (α + β − 1) − |(α + β − 1)B − γ(A − B)| σ} + (1 − ρ2)(1 + |B| σ)σ is an increasing function on (0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1) so that

ϕ(ρ) ≤ ϕ(1) = (1 − σ2){ (α + β − 1) − |(α + β − 1)B − γ(A − B)| σ}. (22) Therefore, from this fact, (21) gives the inequality (12).

(5)

3 Corollaries and Concluding Remarks

By taking A = 1; B = −1 and ρ = 1 in Theorem 2.1, we state the following corollary without proof.

Corollary 3.1. Let the function f ∈ Σp and g(z) ∈ Mp,qα,β(γ) if (Jβ,pα f (z))(q) is majorized by (Jβ,pα g(z))(q) in ∆ then

|(Jβ,pα−1f (z))(q)| ≤ |(Jβ,pα−1g(z))(q)|, |z| ≤ r2,

where r2= r2(α, β, γ) is the smallest positive root of the equation

{|(α + β − 1) + 2γ|r3− {α + β + 1}r2− {|(α + β − 1) + 2γ| + 2}r + (α + β − 1) = 0, given by r2=L1p

L21− 4|α + β − 1 + 2γ|(α + β − 1) 2|α + β − 1 + 2γ|

and L1= α + β + 1 + |α + β − 1 + 2γ|.

By setting α = 1 in Corollary 3.1, we state the following corollary.

Corollary 3.2. Let the function f ∈ Σp and g(z) ∈ Mp,qα,β(γ) if (Jβ,p1 f (z))(q) is majorized by (Jβ,p1 g(z))(q) in ∆ then

|(f (z))(q)| ≤ |(g(z))(q)|, |z| ≤ r3,

where r3= r3(1, β, γ) is the smallest positive root of the equation

|β + 2γ|r3− (β + 2)r2− {|β + 2γ| + 2}r + β = 0, given by r3=L2p

L22− 4β|β + 2γ|

2|β + 2γ|

and L2= β + 2 + |β + 2γ|.

By setting α = 1, β = 1 and γ = p − δ in Corollary 3.1, we state the following corollary.

Corollary 3.3. Let the function f ∈ Σp and g(z) ∈ Mp,qα,β(δ) if (J1,p1 f (z))(q) is majorized by (J1,p1 g(z))(q) in ∆ then

|(f (z))(q)| ≤ |(g(z))(q)|, |z| ≤ r4,

where r4= r4(1, 1, (p − δ)1) is the smallest positive root of the equation

|1 + 2(p − δ)|r3− 3r2− {|1 + 2(p − δ)| + 2}r + 1 = 0, given by r4=L3p

L23− 4|1 + 2(p − δ)|

2|1 + 2(p − δ)|

and L3= 3 + |1 + 2(p − δ)|.

Remark 3.4. By taking p = 1 and q = 0 , Corollary 3.3 yields results of Goyal and Gosami[3].

By taking γ = (p − δ)cos λe−iλ(|λ| <π2, δ(0 ≤ δ < p), in Corollary 3.1, we state the following corollary without proof.

Corollary 3.5. Let the function f ∈ Σp and g(z) ∈ Mp,qα,β(α, λ) if (Jβ,pα f (z))(q) is majorized by (Jβ,pα g(z))(q) in

then

|(Jβ,pα f (z))(q)| ≤ |Jβ,pα (g(z))(q)|, |z| ≤ r, where r = r(T, λ) is given by

r = T −p

T2− 4|α + β − 1 + 2(p − δ)cosλ e−iλ|(α + β − 1) 2|α + β − 1 + 2(p − δ)cosλ e−iλ|

and

T = (α + β + 1) + |1 + 2(p − δ)cosλe−iλ|.

Concluding Remarks: Further specializing the parameters α, β one can define the various other interesting subclasses of Σp involving the various integral operators and the corresponding corollaries as mentioned above can be derived easily.

(6)

References

[1] O. Altinta¸s , ¨O. ¨Ozkan and H. M. Srivastava, Majorization by starlike functions of complex order, Complex Variables Theory Appl. 46 (2001), no. 3, 207–218.

[2] E.Aqlan, J.M.Jahangiri, and S.R.Kulkarni, Certain integral operators applied to meromorphic p-valent functions, J. Nat.

Geom., 24 (2003),111–120.

[3] S. P. Goyal and P.Goswami , Majorization for certain classes of meromorphic functions defined by integral operator, Annales. Univ. Marie-Curie-Sklod. Math. Lett. 66 (2012), no. 2, 57–62.

[4] R. J. Libera, Univalent α spiral-like functions, Canadian. J. Math. Soc. 19 (1967), 449–456.

[5] A.Y. Lashin, On certain subclasses of meromorphic functions associated with certain integral operators, Comput. Math Appl. 59 (1) (2010), 524-531.

[6] G.Murugusundaramoorthy and N. Magesh, Differential subordination and superordination of integral operator on mero- morphic functions”, Math. Sci. Res. J. 13 (2009), no. 3, 68–79

[7] Z.Nahari, Conformal mapping, Mac Gra-Hill Book Company, New York; Toronto and London, 1952.

[8] T. H.Mac Gregor, Majorization by univalent functions, Duke Math. J. 34 (1967), 95–102.

[9] S. S. Miller,and P. T.Mocanu, Differential subordinations, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 225, Dekker, New York, 2000.

[10] L. ˘Spaˇcek, P ˇr´isp˜evek k teorii funkci prost´ch, ˇCasopis P ˇest Math. 63 (1933), 12–19.

[11] H.M. Srivastava, S.Owa, A note on certain class of spiral-like functions, Rend.Sem.Mat.Univ.Padavo., 80 (1988), 17–24.

References

Related documents

The results in Table 2 revealed that amount of carbopol 934 P influenced mucoadhesive strength. On increasing the concentration of carbopol 934 P, mucoadhesive strength

As none of the countries of South Asia is party to the international refugee instruments nor have any of them adopted a national refugee law or procedure, the activities of

In order to measure and track Bangladesh ’ s progress towards UHC and its financial risk protection indica- tors, we assessed incidence of catastrophic and impov- erishing

The first and second methods, A and B, are based on the formation of charge transfer complex between drug and the chromogenic reagents quinalizarin (method A) and

Such offenses are perfectly typified the special part of the Brazilian Penal Code (BRASIL, 1940). Percentage of Violence Against Women Records in Police Stations

The present study was mainly focused on the production of pectinase form Bacillus circulans by optimizing various parameters such as carbon sources,

Empirical results of PCSEmodel confirm that per capita GNI, Female labor force participation rate, Education, Infant mortality rate, and urbanization have statistically