Appendix M: Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) instructions and example
Affective Attribution and Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task
22
Higher autonomic activation predicts better performance in Iowa Gambling Task
23
Excessive social media users demonstrate impaired decision making in the Iowa Gambling Task
5
Go for broke: The role of somatic states when asked to lose in the Iowa Gambling Task
8
Go for broke: The role of somatic states when asked to lose in the Iowa Gambling Task
8
Data from 617 Healthy Participants Performing the Iowa Gambling Task: A “Many Labs” Collaboration
6
A Comparison of Reinforcement Learning Models for the Iowa Gambling Task Using Parameter Space Partitioning. Abstract
32
Adolescents Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: Implications for the Development of Decision Making and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex
11
Decision-making deficits in patients with chronic schizophrenia: Iowa Gambling Task and Prospect Valence Learning model
9
In the winning mood: Affect in the Iowa gambling task
9
Factors affecting learning and decision-making in the Iowa Gambling Task
328
Age Differences in Affective Decision Making as Indexed by Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task
237
Does autonomic arousal distinguish good and bad decisions? Healthy individuals’ skin conductance reactivity during the Iowa Gambling Task
28
The Iowa Gambling Task and the three fallacies of dopamine in gambling disorder
12
Behavioural and neural correlates of the Iowa gambling task
179
Adapting the Iowa Gambling Task to Brazilian Portuguese
5
A rodent version of the iowa gambling task: 7 years of progress
7
Serum BDNF levels in patients with gambling disorder are associated with the severity of gambling disorder and Iowa Gambling Task indices
5
Poor performance on the Iowa gambling task in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder
6
Pupil dilation and cognitive reflection as predictors of performance on the Iowa Gambling Task
7