• No results found

court decisions

Lapides v. Board of Regents and the Untrustworthiness of Unanimous Supreme Court Decisions

Lapides v. Board of Regents and the Untrustworthiness of Unanimous Supreme Court Decisions

... Supreme Court decisions referring to New Hampshire ...Supreme Court opinions noting that a State may not invoke original jurisdiction unless it is a real party in interest see Kansas ...

43

On Assessment of the Supreme Court Decisions in Tackling Substance Misuse in Indonesia

On Assessment of the Supreme Court Decisions in Tackling Substance Misuse in Indonesia

... The court plays a crucial role to form an expected costs of individuals in conducting an offence, since the court is an institution which has ultimate authority to decide the probability and the intensity ...

33

TEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF SHARI'AH CIRCUIT COURT DECISIONS

TEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF SHARI'AH CIRCUIT COURT DECISIONS

... circuit court decisions in the Philippines followed the ruling of Islamic law but were limited only in implementing or handling and resolving civil ...

20

The Implementation of Final Court Decisions in the Republic of Albania

The Implementation of Final Court Decisions in the Republic of Albania

... fair court process, where the enforcing a final decision handed down by the trial panel is part of a trial (Decision dates 19 March 1997 Hornsby ...European Court of Human Rights, Decision dates ...European ...

6

Bearing the Burden of Denial: Observations of Lower Court Decisions Misapplying Supreme Court Precedent in Second Amendment Cases

Bearing the Burden of Denial: Observations of Lower Court Decisions Misapplying Supreme Court Precedent in Second Amendment Cases

... Bearing the Burden of Denial Observations of Lower Court Decisions Misapplying Supreme Court Precedent in Second Amendment Cases SMU Law Review Volume 67 | Issue 2 Article 8 2014 Bearing the Burden of[.] ...

29

Quantifying long-term impact of court decisions

Quantifying long-term impact of court decisions

... the court based on preferential attachment (Bass model (Bass 1999; 2004)) and show that this model provides an excel- lent description of the evolution of the number of citations of individual court ...

15

Linguistic Description and Automatic Extraction of Definitions from German Court Decisions

Linguistic Description and Automatic Extraction of Definitions from German Court Decisions

... definitions in court decisions. Scientific and technical terminology is often built up using more or less context-free general definitions assigning new terms to places within a given taxonomy. In contrast, ...

7

A Certain Uncertainty; Assessment of Court Decisions in Tackling Corruption in Indonesia

A Certain Uncertainty; Assessment of Court Decisions in Tackling Corruption in Indonesia

... supreme court, there is still an opportunity for conducting further appeal called a judicial re-­‐examination by the supreme ...of court in Indonesia is ...the court costs, namely Rp2500 to Rp10,000 ...

39

The Best for Last: The Timing of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

The Best for Last: The Timing of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

... multi-opinion decisions would cluster at the end of the term—not because they are big but because they have attributes that elongate the work time required for completion and ...

32

Customary International Human Rights Law in Domestic Court Decisions

Customary International Human Rights Law in Domestic Court Decisions

... Lower courts which try to import or imaginatively develop the norms of general or customary international law of human rights as rules of decision in cases before t[r] ...

30

The Content of Court Decisions in Administrative Legal Proceedings of Ukraine

The Content of Court Decisions in Administrative Legal Proceedings of Ukraine

... the court where the administrative case was heard, the name of judge who considered the case, full names of all participants to the case, third persons or their representatives, and the subject of dispute; the ...

9

Principles of revision of court decisions are in an administrative process

Principles of revision of court decisions are in an administrative process

... Як бачимо, серед принципів адмі- ністративного судочинства наявний принцип забезпечення апеляційно- го та касаційного оскарження рішень адміністративного суду, крім випад- ків, [r] ...

6

Supreme Court Decisions on Federal Criminal Procedure

Supreme Court Decisions on Federal Criminal Procedure

... Justice Sanford cited the Myers case as holding that "a proceeding instituted by the United States for the punishment of a criminal contempt committed by a violation of an injunction is [r] ...

27

Does the Evolving Concept of Due Process in Obergefell Justify Judicial Regulation of Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change?: Juliana v. United States

Does the Evolving Concept of Due Process in Obergefell Justify Judicial Regulation of Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change?: Juliana v. United States

... Another argument is that the Obergefell Court could have followed lower federal court decisions using a narrower equal protection analysis to achieve the result of [r] ...

51

The Taxation of Prejudgment Interest in Personal Injury Cases

The Taxation of Prejudgment Interest in Personal Injury Cases

... by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. That rule was modified by the Schleier two prong test. The Tax Court decision cited by Judge Beghe, Downey v.. compassion for [r] ...

19

Attitudes of Police Executives toward Miranda and Interrogation Policies, The

Attitudes of Police Executives toward Miranda and Interrogation Policies, The

... implementation of Supreme Court decisions should explore the speed and level of transmission of information about case decisions.2 53 The present research explores the general impact of [r] ...

71

Eliminating Overlap, or Creating a Gap? Judicial Interpretation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and RICO

Eliminating Overlap, or Creating a Gap? Judicial Interpretation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and RICO

... Supreme Court decisions, the leading antitrust treatise, 2A Philip ...a court ought not to hold that RICO’s equitable remedies, including disgorgement, are in any fashion solely ...

47

Adolescent Transfer, Developmental Maturity, and Adjudicative Competence: An Ethical and Justice Policy Inquiry

Adolescent Transfer, Developmental Maturity, and Adjudicative Competence: An Ethical and Justice Policy Inquiry

... METHOD This research investigates the underlying ethical reasoning communicated in various state supreme court and state appellate court decisions that address adolescent waiver, develop[r] ...

55

Doctrinal Doldrums: The Supreme Court 1976 Term Criminal Law Decisions

Doctrinal Doldrums: The Supreme Court 1976 Term Criminal Law Decisions

... The Supreme Court disagreed and held that a failure to take advantage of a procedural device before or during trial sufficient to present the matter constitutes an independent and adequa[r] ...

25

The formalized framework for decision making in child protection care orders : a cross country analysis

The formalized framework for decision making in child protection care orders : a cross country analysis

... Within local authorities in England, managerial oversight of cases will be evident. This will involve social work decisions being overseen by managers within the organization; the local authority legal department ...

18

Show all 10000 documents...

Related subjects