Moot Court Competition
2017 National Environmental Moot Court Competition Problem
... Supreme Court has, in its more recent takings cases, rejected so-called “conceptual sever- ance” arguments that would apply a takings analysis to just one portion of a combined ...
18
The Twenty-Ninth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Brief for Respondent, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 151 (2010)
... Marshall common law only recognizes a cause of action for breach of contract when: 1) a contract existed; 2) the plaintiff performed its condi- tions; 3) the defendant breached; and 4) the breach resulted in damages. ...
35
2009 John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Brief for the Petitioner, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 131 (2009)
... Most persons are connected with some activity, vocational or avoca- tional, as to which the public can be said as a matter of law to have a legitimate interest or curiosity. To hold as a matter of law that private facts ...
39
2009 John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 95 (2009)
... Supreme Court stated that “[t]he question we confront today is what limits there are upon this power of technology to shrink the realm of guaranteed privacy ...
37
The Twenty-Ninth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Brief for Petitioner, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 119 (2010)
... Because MarshCODE admits that the announcement it made to Ms. Who was false, thereby establishing the first element of the claim, Mr. Murphy only has to establish that MarshCODE (1) publicized the false portrayal and (2) ...
33
The Twenty-Ninth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 81 (2010)
... the Church of Primary Saints his comments on radio and television ex- pressed and promoted his Church’s principles and values but these ac- tions are not enough to turn him into a public figure, nor do they constitute an ...
39
1997 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 16 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 685 (1998)
... Petitioner contends that the Marshall Internet Child Protection Act violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment by mandating the installation and use of fil[r] ...
93
The Twenty-Fifth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Brief for the Petitioner, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 699 (2006)
... Petitioner subsequently petitioned the First District Court of Ap- peals for review of the circuit court order granting summary judgment. Reyes reviewed the case de n[r] ...
101
The Thirtieth Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Brief for the Petitioner, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 103 (2011)
... The court rejected plaintiff’s invasion of privacy argument holding that the materials were of significant public concern because they reflected on the guilt or innocence of alleged criminal ...The Court in ...
37
The Thirtieth Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 75 (2011)
... Shortly after Mayor Payoff left office one year ago, he was indicted in the Circuit Court of Marshall County stemming from alleged corruption during his nearly twenty-five years in office. Mayor Payoff had ...
29
The Twenty-Fifth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 673 (2006)
... Petitioner subsequently petitioned the First District Court of Ap- peals for review of the circuit court order granting summary judgment. Reyes reviewed the case de n[r] ...
102
2009 John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Brief for the Respondent, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 169 (2009)
... district court in the Northern District of Illi- nois recently explained what was required to raise a genuine issue of material fact on the intrusion element when the defendant did not physi- cally enter the ...
31
The Twenty-Sixth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Brief for the Respondent, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 371 (2008)
... NESBIT'S ALLEGED INTRUSION ... THE APPELLATE COURT PROPERLY AFFIRMED THAT CONDEVEL WAS EXEMPT FROM THE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT OF MARSHALL'S DATA PROTECTION ACT ... DISC[r] ...
39
The Twenty-Sixth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Brief for the Petitioner, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 337 (2008)
... STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS INVOLVED.. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ... NESBIT INTRUDED UPON BAYLOR'S SECLUSION WHEN HE INSTALLED A KEYLOGGER PROGRAM ON BAYLOR'S WORKP[r] ...
35
The Twenty-Sixth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 305 (2008)
... faith acquisition of personal information by an employee or agent of the agency is not a breach of the security of the system, provided that the personal information [r] ...
34
1995 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 14 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 563 (1996)
... The trial court held that Jacobs was subject to personal jurisdiction in the State of Marshall under the Marshall long-arm statute. at 5.) As to Jacobs claim that Jennife[r] ...
95
1998 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 17 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 643 (1999)
... Section 2701 of the ECPA permits a court to hold Magnum liable to June Harper if it (1) intentionally accessed a stored wire or electronic communication (2) without [r] ...
79
2011 National Environmental Law Moot Court Competition Problem
... court has no jurisdiction to proceed with CARE’s citizen suit to force EPA to take a mandatory action under § 7002(a)(2), to wit, taking action on CARE’s § 7004 petition to commence proceedings to withdraw its ...
17
1994 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition in Information and Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 13 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 481 (1995)
... The court of appeals was correct when it held Petitioner liable under the Statute for creating child pornography and disseminating it to a mi- nor. Petitioner's interactive se[r] ...
93
1996 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition in Information and Privacy Law: Brief for the Petitioner, 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 609 (1997)
... The Court of Appeals for the State of Marshall affirmed the Circuit Court's granting of summary judgment in favor of NSI on both claims. The Court of Appeals concurred[r] ...
93