PROTAPER ROTARY SYSTEM AND K - FILES
A comparative finite analysis of the mechanical behavior of ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne rotary files
6
Torsional resistance of three ProTaper rotary systems
6
Comparative evaluation of debris extruded apically during endodontic retreatment using hedstrom files and two rotary nickel titanium (niti) instruments, k3 and protaper universal retreatment files
8
Comparative evaluation of remaining dentinal thickness after protaper next, neoendo flex, Mtwo rotary files preparation using CBCT: An In Vitro study
105
Computed Tomography Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Volumetric Changes in Root Canal Dentin of Curved Canals Using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next Rotary System-An In-vitro Study
5
Shaping Ability of WaveOne and ProTaper NEXT Rotary Nickel–titanium File Systems in Simulated Curved Root Canals
7
Computed tomography evaluation of root canal transportation using ProTaper, Race and Sendoline rotary systems: an ex vivo study
6
An in vitro evaluation of preparation of flat oval canals using self adjusting files and rotary NI TI system, by CBCT
5
Comparison of the Shaping Ability of Hyflex® CM™ Files with ProTaper Next® in Simulated L-Curved Canals
8
A Comparison of One Shape and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems for Elimination of Enterococcus Faecalis from Root Canal: Microbiological and SEM Evaluation
6
A Comparative Evaluation of Gutta Percha Removal and Extrusion of Apical Debris by Rotary and Hand Files
5
The Effect of Autoclave Sterilization on the Fracture Resistance of ProTaper Rotary Files
5
Remaining dentine thickness of root canals prepared with K-3 and ProTaper rotary systems
5
Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation
23
ProTaper Rotary Instrument Fracture During Root Canal Preparation: A Comparison Between Rotary and Hybrid Techniques
7
Universal Endo System Directions for Use. ProTaper
7
The effect of electropolishing on torque and force during simulated root canal preparation with ProTaper shaping files
17
Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence
17
The influence of the manufacturing process of rotary files on the shaping of L-shaped canals
6
Comparison of the Shaping Ability of Two Rotary Files in Simulated L-Curved Canals
9